Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S"mula"ng interac"on in larger classes
Sophia University, 8th June 2015
Heath Rose Associate Professor of Applied Linguis"cs Department of Educa"on Oxford University
(un"l August)
About me
As a teacher
• Taught at Rikkyo University and Kanda University in Japan (class sizes of 20-‐30)
• Taught in Australian primary, secondary, and higher educa"on (class sizes of 25 to 50)
• Taught at Trinity College Dublin (class sizes of 10 to 150)
As a teacher of teaching
• Teach teaching methods at Trinity College Dublin for the M.Phil. Courses • I will teach at Oxford University for the M.Sc. In Teaching English to Learners in University SeWngs (TELUS) • I have run various FD workshops on teaching methodology
As a researcher of teaching
• Have published educa"on-‐related work in teaching journals like ELT Journal, Modern Language Journal, and Language Learning in Higher Educa"on.
• Co-‐authored Introducing Global Englishes (2015)
Why focus on large classes?
University contexts lecturers must contend with inspiring young minds and educa"ng students in large
lecture-‐style classes
Movements away from lecture-‐style teaching works well for a\en"ve
students who are mo"vated to learn, it is
ineffec"ve for the majority of students
Student-‐centered teaching
research shows students learn best when required to par"cipate in the learning process
Overview
Challenges in teaching large classes
Small ideas to s"mulate par"cipa"on in lectures
Ideas for changing teaching approaches in large classes
Assessment in large classes
THE CHALLENGE OF TEACHING LARGE CLASSES
Part One
How large is large?
TASK 1 • What do I mean by large? How large is large? – Answer ques"ons 1 and 2 on your handout.
• Discuss your answer with two or three people next to you. Agree on a group answer for ques"on 1 and 2.
How large is large?
• Depends what you are used to… – A lecturer with 400 students in a class will think that 40 is small
– A lecturer with 40 students in a class will think that 10 is small
• Depends on how you teach… – A teacher who prefers lecture-‐style classes will think 40 is small
– A lecturer who prefers student-‐centered classes will find 40 too big
How large is large?
• This ques"on is a li\le irrelevant. – Research shows teachers need to be adap"ng their approaches from lecture-‐style approaches to student-‐centered approaches, regardless of the number of students in the class
– However, with larger classes this can be a li\le more difficult in terms of management and planning à changing teaching approach requires a complete change in curriculum
Moving to a student-‐centered approach
• In educa"onal research, there has been emphasis on: – Student-‐centered learning – Self-‐directed learning / learner autonomy – Collabora"ve learningà sociocultural theory
• Ideas from Vygotsky and Piaget • Peers learn more effec"vely from each other • Peers learn more effec"vely through social prac"ce
Small class vs. Large class teaching
• What is the major difference/challenge between teaching large classes, compared to small classes?
h\ps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi7BxXWMieY
Tutorials vs. lectures
Research shows students enjoy and benefit from small groups, which is why many lectures are accompanied by tutorials. The tutorial specifically has been noted for its value in: • Complemen"ng knowledge in lectures • Expanding on the concepts considered in lectures • Encouraging student reflec"on • Developing students' communica"on skills • Encouraging ac"ve life-‐long learning
www.ucd.ie/teaching
Problem: Not all lectures have tutorials
Solu"on: Need to integrate tutorial-‐style learning into large classes to
leverage the benefits
SMALL IDEAS TO STIMULATE PARTICIPATION IN LECTURES
Part Two
Small ideas to integrate into exis"ng lectures
Adap"ng structure and pace
Encouraging silent
reflec"on
Partner discussions
Cross-‐over discussions
A\en"on span in lectures Difficulty maintaining a passive acJvity for > 15 mins
Can restore learners by changing the acJvity or pace of learning
h\p://flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz/teaching-‐large-‐classes/2.html
1. Adap"ng structure and pace
• Signpos"ng the lecture – What will you cover? – What is the structure of the talk? – Recap on important points at the end.
• Add in elements to break up the style – Cartoons, pictures, colour – Tasks – Q&A
• Move
SeWng the right tone for class h\p://ctl.utexas.edu/teaching/engagement/teaching-‐large
To recap
• Lecture like there is an open dialogue, that communica"on is two-‐ways
• Set the tone in the first class • Answer any ques"on like it is important • Engage students directly • Change the physical space • Break content – consider humorous breaks, cartoons, popular references
2. Silent reflec"on
• This is where you give students a few minutes to think about a problem or issue. – Ask them to write down their thoughts or ideas on a note pad.
– Keep the task specific. For example, ask them to write down the three most important aspects of an issue.
2. Silent reflec"on
• Think-‐pair-‐share -‐> takes silent reflec"on further: – Think about their answer/ideas – Discuss their answer/idea with their neighbor – Share the answer/idea with the class
• This technique suits quieter students and ensures that everyone has an opportunity to par"cipate
3. Partner/small group discussions
• A teacher may have a discussion with the students, perhaps using PowerPoint or an overhead with some ques"ons for them to consider – Then have the students discuss this with their neighbor
– Arer a few minutes, the lecturer can then reveal the answer or discuss the ideas with them
– Group students in no more than four students; and have only two discussions per lecture
h\p://flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz/teaching-‐large-‐classes/6.html
3. Partner/small group discussions During a lecture using PowerPoint: • Explain the concept; • Show a dialog with four op"ons to choose from; • Give the students one minute to discuss the op"ons among themselves;
• Have the students vote on the correct answer; • Give them the answers, explaining first which is the correct one and refer to their notes. Then discuss why the other answers may or may not also be partly correct.
h\p://flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz/teaching-‐large-‐classes/6.html
4. Cross-‐over discussions
• This gets students in the class to move, which might be ideal for long lectures
• Need pre-‐organiza"on, e.g. I assign students a card and some"mes get them to work in groups of KKKK, or KQJA, hearts, etc
5. One-‐minute papers / index cards / short quizzes
• Have students write a one-‐minute paper – a summary of the most important points learned in the lecture – have them post the paper to blackboard/moodle, or hand into the teacher
• Students could pose ques"ons on index cards and hand them in to be answered immediately, or at the start of the next lecture, or online
• Students could engage in short, graded or ungraded, 5 minute quizzes on paper to check understanding on lecture content
IDEAS FOR CHANGING TEACHING APPROACHES IN LARGE CLASSES
Part Three
Bigger ideas to re-‐organize exis"ng lectures
Reading Groups
Case studies
Blended learning
Presenta"ons Organized debates
4. Reading groups
5. Case studies
• Popular in business courses – e.g. the Harvard Case Method – Students are presented with a business case, outlining an important issue or business decisions, and they have to work in groups to decide the best course of ac"on for the company involved
5. Case studies
• In addi"on to business, cases could be used from key textbooks in: – Law – Poli"cal science – Economics – History – Philosophy – Educa"on – Nursing, medical sciences, etc.
6. Blended learning
• Technology is a tool for teaching and learning – it is not a method of teaching and learning
• Use exis"ng technology to add elements to the lectures that are not possible in large groups such as: – Discussion groups, tasks, tests, and Q&A on Moodle or Blackboard
– Peer reading of assignments via turni"n – Vo"ng on assignment topics using doodle polls
6. Blended learning
• Explore new technology to add elements of interac"on within the lecture – Using clickers and clicker apps for interac"on
Why use clickers?
• Clickers allow students to respond anonymously, making it safer for students to share their perspec"ves and take risks since their peers are not aware of their individual responses
• Instructors can track student responses using clickers, crea"ng accountability for par"cipa"on during class, which in turn increases par"cipa"on
• The display of results provides further mo"va"on for meaningful discussion as students become aware of divergent views
Derek Bruff, Essays on Teaching Excellence, The University of Chicago
The Twi\er Experiment h\ps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WPVWDkF7U8
3.51
Twi\er summary
• Twi\er was successful in: – Engaging a large group at once – Allowing large groups to par"cipate in discussion and Q&A
– Increasing par"cipa"on of shy students – Having students limit ideas and ques"ons to 140 characters
– Put ideas into public domain – Refer back to twi\er feed to review content
7. Presenta"ons
• Dedica"ng some lecture "me to student-‐led group presenta"ons might be another valuable way inject student-‐centered learning into large classes – Group presenta"ons could replace some lectures to cover set topics for the week
– In very large classes presenta"ons could be run outside of class "me, or in a conference-‐style, or in the style of a contest
Rikkyo University
Interna"onal Business Course
8. Debates
• Debates on controversial issues are a good way to encourage par"cipa"on from students. In large classes, debates need: – To be performed in small break-‐out groups – To be highly organized in advance – Students to be well informed and prepared – Controlled under strict management
Fish-‐bowl debates
• Students usually work in teams, and four teams form a group
• In the group, two teams debate while two teams watch (and assess); then arer a set "me the students switch roles of debaters and audience
ASSESSMENT IN LARGE CLASSES Sec"on Four
Common problems
• Difficulty in grading wri\en assignments • Use of tests when it does not suit subject ma\er
• Reduc"on in number of assignments, which may add an unfair element to the course, especially in terms of reduc"on in forma"ve assessment
• Dealing with student queries can be difficult
Trinity College Context
• Students are required to write a 4,000 word end-‐of-‐term paper for most modules – A wri\en feedback system was in place, based on small class sizes
– In 2011, the department offered university-‐wide courses, which a\racted 100-‐150 students
– Equated to 600,000 words to read, and give feedback on
Center for Teaching at Vanderbilt University offers the following advice • Not grading all forma"ve assessment, but using them as a means to give informal feedback to help in the final assignment
• Incorpora"ng more group assignments and accountability
• Light grading on small assignments • Using a feedback key for wri\en comments • Using grading rubrics to cut down on comments à fast AND fairer
Page 2 of 2
Grade descriptors: I Demonstrates a full understanding of key issues, an ability to construct a detailed argument on the basis of that
understanding, and a capacity for developing innovative lines of thought. II.1 Demonstrates a full understanding of key issues and an ability not only to construct a detailed argument on the basis of that
understanding, but to generate additional insights. II.2 Demonstrates a full understanding of key issues and an ability to construct a detailed argument on the basis of that
understanding. III Demonstrates an adequate understanding of key issues and an ability to construct a basic argument.
F1/F2 A student may fail because of: serious misunderstanding of the question; serious misunderstanding of the main issues and concepts; serious weaknesses in use of sources; poor presentation; poor internal consistency; or poor presentation and/or style. An F2 indicates a mark is non- compensatory.
F III II.2 II.1 I
Structure
There may be serious weakness in the internal consistency and organisation of the assignment.
The student has presented ideas and arguments, although the work lacks coherence of clarity in places.
The student has organised ideas and arguments in a structured and logical format, following an adequate academic writing style.
The student has organised ideas and arguments in a structured and logical format, following an appropriate academic style.
The student has masterfully organized ideas and arguments for maximum clarity following an appropriate academic style.
Content
There may be serious weakness in coverage of content.
The student has demonstrated a limited understanding of key concepts related to the assignment.
The student has demonstrated an adequate understanding of key concepts related to the assignment.
The student has demonstrated a good understanding of key concepts related to the assignment topic.
The student has demonstrated a full understanding of key concepts related to the assignment.
Coherence of argument
There may be serious weakness in the organisation of arguments.
The student constructs a basic argument on the basis of their understanding of the subject matter.
The student has supported claims with evidence.
The student has drawn sound conclusions based on clear evidence.
The student has constructed a sustained argument based on a superior understanding of the subject matter.
Independ-ence of thought
The assignment may be wholly descriptive.
The assignment may be largely descriptive.
There is some evidence of independent thought.
The student has generated additional insights.
The student has shown a capacity for developing innovative lines of thought.
Use made of relevant literature
Use of sources may be inadequate, uncritical, irrelevant and/ or casually paraphrased or plagiarised.
The student has made minimal use of reliable, relevant sources.
The student used a range of sources in their explanation of key concepts. Arguments were supported but could have been strengthened through more systematic use of sources.
The student has demonstrated a systematic use of sources through research of key concepts, and in support of their arguments and claims.
The student has demonstrated a critical use of sources through extensive research of key concepts, and in support of their arguments and claims.
Present-ation
There may be serious weakness in style of presentation (i.e. punctuation, spelling, grammar, referencing, etc.).
The assignment achieves a minimal standard of presentation in spite of errors in formatting, referencing, or writing.
The assignment is presentable, but does not adhere fully to an academic style of formatting, referencing, and writing.
The assignment adheres to an academic style of formatting, referencing, and writing.
The assignment approaches a professional editorial standard.
Note: This table has not been used to calculate the grade for the assignment. It is used to provide you with detailed feedback on how your assignment has met each of the grade descriptors.
A rubric gives students a more transparent
breakdown of how the essay is scored, according to the grading criteria. It
can be used to show what the student
achieved and did not achieve.
Improving task prompts
Examine wri"ng systems for sign languages, and discuss the prac"cal implica"ons of adequately expressing a signed language using wri\en script.
“Examine” and “Discuss” are vague. What aspects should
the student examine?
The task statement does not let students know according to what criteria to base their
discussion on
Improved task statement Discuss proposed wri"ng systems for sign language. Based on your research into wri"ng systems, outline the problems surrounding represen"ng a non-‐verbal language in wri"ng. Evaluate which of the current proposed systems offers the most poten"al for accurately represen"ng signed languages in a usable script.
Students are told how to apply learned knowledge to the
assignment topic.
The task statement explici"ly requires students to cri"cally
evaluate the topic, and therefore affords an
opportunity for innova"ve thought
Providing model assignments
• Best to provide a model assignment on a “re"red” essay topic – Most students are more interested in required tone and style, rather than examining content
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl
LLAARRGGEE CCLLAASSSSEESS:: AA TTEEAACCHHIINNGG GGUUIIDDEE
TTEEAACCHHIINNGG,, LLEEAARRNNIINNGG && TTEECCHHNNOOLLOOGGYY CCEENNTTEERR
UC IRVINE
Large & Small Group Teaching
Teaching Toolkit
Author: Paul Surgenor
Email: [email protected]
Date: January 2010
www.heathrose.net
Thank you