23
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING REPORT SUBMITTED BY:- SANDEEP KUMAR HARMEET SINGH

SML PPT

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

summer training report

Citation preview

Slide 1

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING REPORT

SUBMITTEd BY:-Sandeep kumarHarmeet singhArun kumarHarjot singhPROJECTS UNDERTAKENPROJECT-1:STUDY OF EXCESSIVE NON VALUE ADDINGWORK DONE BY WORKERS IN AXLE ASSEMBLYSTATION.

PROJECT-2:STUDY OF ENGINE TESTING FACILITYManual Assembly lines:

A production line that consists of a sequence of workstations where assembly tasks are performed by human workers.Products are assembled as they move along the line.At each station a portion of the total work content is performed on each unit.

Work Transport Systems-Manual Methods:

Manual methods:Work units are moved between stations by the workers (by hand) without powered conveyor.

Problems:Starving of stations:The assembly operator has completed the assigned task on the current work unit, but the next unit has not yet arrived at the stationBlocking of stationsThe operator has completed the assigned task on the current work unit but cannot pass the unit to the downstream station because that worker is not yet ready to receive it.

ASSEMBLY LINE

REAR AXLE

FRONT AXLETypes of wastes:Following are some of the non-value-adding processes during assembly:

1)Transportation2)Inventory3)Motion4)Waiting5)Over-processing6)Over-production7)Defects

*WASTES= Activities that dont add any value to the final productAxle assembly station:The present axle assembly stations layout brought many inefficiencies in the production process like :

LESS FLEXIBILITY NON VALUE ADDING WORKHIGH PRODUCTION TIMENOT PROPER CAPACITY UTILISATION

Our study was aimed at reducing these inefficiencies by making suitable improvements in the present layout of workstation. PRESENT LAYOUT

Rear AxleSUGGESTED LAYOUT

BENEFITS OF NEW LAYOUTFLEXIBILITY .REDUCTION IN NON VALUE ADDING WORK.REDUTION IN TIME.CAPACITY UTILISATION.ENGINE TESTING SETUP

ENGINE TESTING PARAMETERSWATER INLET AND OUTLET TEMPRATURE.AIR INLET AND EXHAUST.INTERCOOLER INLET AND OUTLET TEMPRATURE AND PRESSURE.LUBRICATING OIL TEMPRATURE AND PRESSURE.RPM

S NOParameters of engine testingOutput1Output2Output31RPM1218200027922Water outlet temp29C30C30C3Exhaust temp50C55C62C4Engine air inlet temp45C46C46C5Air temp(before intercooler)62C89C136C6Air temp(after intercooler)40C40C40C7Intake water temp40C42C45C8Lubricant oil temp113C124C138C9Lubricant oil pressure1 bar1bar1bar10Boost pressure(before intercooler)0.0840.3050.66611Boost pressure(after intercooler)0.0670.2610.56112Engine air intake pressure-29kg/cm-50 kg/cm-75 kg/cm13Intercooler temp46.2C46.9C49.6C14Idle oil pessure1.7 kg/cm4.5 kg/cm4.9 kg/cmRESULTS

CAUSES OF ENGINE REJECTION

1)Noise from the turbocharger2) Engine fails to start3) Noise from the bearings of engine4) Leakage from oil filter5) Engine head noise6) Water leakage from engine7) Less power output than required8) Leakage from cylinder head

Analysis: FITMENTProblemWhy?Why?Turbocharger making noise during the testing stageWrong bolts used during engine testing for fitment of turbocharger duct to the inlet of turbocharger.Mix-up of bolts at engine testing for fitment of turbocharger duct to turbocharger. ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFIED:

Wrong fitment of bolts during assembly of duct to turbocharger.

Wrong bolts were used because two different kinds of bolts used for testing setup didnt have any identification marks.

The different bolts were not segregated in different boxes.

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS:

Use same standardized bolts

Use standardized tool

Use color code for bolts

Put the different bolts in different boxes

Inspection of all testing arrangementsIMPACT OF SOLUTIONS:

Time impact: Less wastage on the rework of defected engines.

Customer satisfaction impact: Higher production rates and in-time delivery of the finished product.

Cost impact: Cost of poor quality would be reduced as less amount of rework would be needed.THANK YOU