Upload
marrim
View
42
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
SME’s participation in EU sponsored projects. Tomasz Cioska. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
26 November 2002
SME’s participation in SME’s participation in EU sponsored projectsEU sponsored projects
Tomasz CioskaTomasz Cioska
26 November 2002
OutlineOutline
PLAZMATRONIKA’s access to the Fifth Framework Programme for Cooperative Research GROWTH project on utilisation of asbestos residues as an example of opportunities and problems for Polish SME’s related to the participation in EU sponsored projects
26 November 2002
SAFE project - SAFE project - characteristics characteristics • Project acronym: SAFE• Purpose: development of safe techniques for asbestos abatement and
elimination works (waste treatment and elimination)• Partners: INERTEC (coordinator), SOLDATA, BBRI (Belgium Building
Research Institute), CMS, SMH, Plazmatronika, InVerTec, RWTH• Plazmatronika’s task: development of the pre-industrial microwave
cavity • Contract signing date: 14 June 2001• Kick-off meeting date: 9 July 2001• Estimated eligible costs: 2,854,815 € • Maximum community contribution: 1,747,663 €• Plazmatronika’s share: 245,841 €, 50% EU’s participation: 122,920 €• Timing: 36 months
26 November 2002
OpportunitiesOpportunities• Gaining intercultural experience through
cooperation with European partners and institutions • Practical preparation for every day work in EU
business and institutional environment before formal access of Poland to EU
• Organisational experience – EU-imposed formal project management rules– strict internal accounting and controlling procedures
• Additional funding for technology development• Opening European markets for SME’s products
through cooperation with EU partners
26 November 2002
Possible difficultiesPossible difficulties• Lack of adequate cooperation with Polish
authorities and institutions• Unfavourable climate for Polish hi-tech
companies in Polish scientific circles• Complexity of EU procedures• Strict project management and accounting
requirements imposed• Difficult communication with European
partners (cultural differences)• R&D Companies’ subordinate position in
structuring projects
26 November 2002
Filing procedureFiling procedure• The complexity of procedure making the
filing of applications and reporting an art in itself– Necessity to train in house staff
• scarcity of resources in SMEs• lack of appropriate coaching
– Lack of qualified institutions providing overall assistance to SMEs interested in taking part in a EU sponsored projects
• Long-lasting process (1.5 years)
26 November 2002
Filing procedure ctd.Filing procedure ctd.
• Lack of information on the advance of the procedure
• Binding terms imposed only upon the applicants, not the EU authorities
• One sided contract with EU (joint and several liability of partners)
• Incoherence of project and general accounting rules
26 November 2002
Project ManagementProject Management
• Necessity to introduce strict internal accounting and controlling procedures for project settlement purposes only may be too costly and burdensome for SMEs
• Lack of flexibility in changing the allocation of funds and changing project execution schedules troublesome in case of elaborating prototype technologies, which, by definition are, unpredictable
26 November 2002
PartnersPartners• Difficulty in obtaining equal financing conditions with Western
partners for Polish SMEs• Unequal financial standing of Polish SMEs and Western
partners• Business culture differences• Unwillingness to specify the principles of future use of
technologies developed in the consortium agreement • Polish R&D Companies’ subordinate position in a project
– Low manmonths– Inadequate infrastructure – High participation costs vs. uncertain outcome
26 November 2002
Polish taxes and lawPolish taxes and law• Unstable tax and legal environment in Poland making
difficult the planning of expenditure several years in advance• The scope of the problem:
– VAT (22%)– CIT (28%)– PIT (19%-40%)– Social Security (19%)
• Unclear and changing situation as to the tax status of EU funding– frequent changes of official interpretations – known cases of retroactive payment of taxes by beneficiaries of
EU funding
26 November 2002
Thank you for your Thank you for your attention!attention!