17
Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have broad stakeholder acceptance Indentify Standards Gaps Process Identify Principles for discussions Map low hanging fruit to priority interfaces

Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit

Objective:• Build towards consensus on the existing and

emerging standards that have broad stakeholder acceptance

• Indentify Standards Gaps

Process• Identify Principles for discussions• Map low hanging fruit to priority interfaces

Page 2: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridProcess

• There is no defined governance so we will not petition any votes. We will bin standards into 3 categories. Those that do not fit in any of the categories will be left in an undefined bin.– Green: Are there any Candidate standards that have 100%

agreement or very little opposing view– no brainers?– Yellow: Are there standards that are reasonably close, but

may need caveats, additions, updates, constraints, or other qualifications? What are those qualifications?

– Red: Are there standards that should not be in Release 1?

• Ask for views on green first, then reds, then any yellows/discuss, finally if time left discuss undefined with the goal of moving to a color

Page 3: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridPrinciples

• Standards must:– Be Open– Facilitate 2-way secure communication– Follow the principle of segmentation of duties– Support Compliance– Provide mechanism for generational compliance– Follow a loosely coupled architecture– Is this list good, other?... discussion

ref: Utility Standards acceleration and lifecycle docs

Page 4: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridKey Principles of Standards Strategy

Adoption

Open Governance

Participation

Acquisition

Certification

Process forces compliance with standards

1. Openness2. Separation of Duties

3. Generational Compliance 4. Loose Coupling

1st

Generation2nd

GenerationCertification

Process forces compliance with standards

Process forces compliance with standards

Certification

User Groups

Industry AlliancesSDOs

Page 5: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

Initial Candidate List Low Hanging Fruit Standards mapped to session 3 list

• ANSI C12.19 / IEEE 1377 / MC1219

• IEEE C37.118

• IEC 61968/61970 (CIM)

• MultiSpeak

• IEEE 1547

• BACnet – ASHRAE/ANSI 135, ISO 16484-5

• IEC 61850

• IEC 60870-6 TASE.2

• DNP3

• IEC 62351

• NERC CIP 002-009

• NIST Security Standards – FIPS 140-1, NIST SP800-53, NIST SP800-82, etc.

• IEEE 802 family

• IETF Internet Standards – TCP/IP, VPNs, TLS, SNMP, etc.

• IEC PAS 62559

• HomePlug/ZigBee Alliance Smart Energy Profile

• UtilityAMI 2008 HAN Systems Requirements Specification

• UtilityAMI UtiliSec/AMI-SEC Specification

Page 6: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridANSI C12.19 / IEEE 1377 / MC1219

• Application: End devices, including revenue metering applications, information model

• Actors: End Device (including Meters), Head End, Collector, Handheld Interrogator

• Interfaces: Multiple media – optical, wired, and wireless• Maturity: Ultra wide acceptance, has governance, has

certification and testing,• Category: SDO – ANSI / IEEE 1377/ MC1219 – American

National Standard, IEEE Standard, Measurement Canada Standard

• Issues: Used primarily in North America, competes with other standards internationally, aging from an IT technological sophistication perspective.

Page 7: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

IEC 61968/61970 Common Information Model (CIM)

• Application: Enterprise information representation, including transmission, distribution, back office metering

• Actors: Databases, software applications• Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, XML/SOAP• Maturity: Wide acceptance in concept, has governance, has

users group, however, no certification, interoperability has not been standardized, and significant testing is required

• Category: SDO - International (IEC) Standard• Issues: Needs application specific extensions to extract

maximum value, competes with NRECA MultiSpeak although harmonization effort is in progress.

Page 8: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridIEEE 1547 for DER

• Application: Physical and Electrical Interconnections• Actors: Customers, vendors, utilities• Interfaces: Point of Common Coupling (PCC)• Maturity: Wide acceptance and implementation by

utilities, vendors, and their customers• Category: SDO - IEEE• Issues: On-going work to address networked power

systems, testing, and other issues

Page 9: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridBACnet – ASHRAE/ANSI 135, ISO 16484-5

• Application: building automation• Actors: Building EMS, building infrastructure devices• Interfaces: Serial, Ethernet, IP – wired and wireless• Maturity: Widely accepted nationally, has

governance, has users group, has certification and testing

• Category: SDO – National (ASHRAE/ANSI) and International Standard (ISO)

• Issues: Supports IP through BACNet/IP in Annex J

Page 10: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridIEC 61850

• Application: Substation Automation and Protection, Distribution Automation, Distributed Energy Resources, Hydro Generation, SCADA to field devices

• Actors: Protective relays, SCADA Master, DER, PQ Meters, fault recorders, applications

• Interfaces: Ethernet and IP based communications, with on-going work for network architecture to address environments with different network constraints

• Maturity: Wide acceptance, into third round of update, has governance, has users group, has certification and testing

• Category: SDO - International Standard• Issues: competes/overlaps with DNP3 in some applications,

best practice for high speed relay-to-relay communication, wide acceptance internationally, growing acceptance nationally for green field application

Page 11: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridDNP3

• Application: Substation and feeder device automation• Actors: Protective relays, metering devices, cap bank

controllers, switches, SCADA Master, applications• Interfaces: Serial, Ethernet, IP over TCP or UDP, • Maturity: Ultra wide acceptance nationally, has security built in,

has governance, has users group, has certification and testing• Category: De facto, Open, Industry Standard• Issues: competes/overlaps with IEC 61850 in some

applications, aging somewhat from an IT technological sophistication point of view, register based, no inherent semantic meaning to registers

Page 12: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridIEEE 802 family of Standards

• Application: Wireless standards and wireless security• Actors: Many• Interfaces: Many• Maturity: Depends on subpart. 802.3 (Ethernet) is ultra mature.

802.11 (WiFi) and 802.15 (Bluetooth and Zigbee) are very mature. 802.16 (WiMax) is widely accepted but early in its life and adoption cycle. 802.11i (wireless security) is widely accepted and implemented

• Category: SDO – IEEE• Issues: Fundamental communications standard. Selection of

specific subpart to implement depends on application requirements.

Page 13: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

IETF Internet Standards – TCP/IP, VPNs, TLS, SNMP, etc.

• Application: Where appropriate for public and private internets and communications

• Actors: Many• Interfaces: Many• Maturity: Very mature in most cases• Category: SDO – IETF• Issues: Not appropriate for all Smart Grid

environments. Selection of specific standards highly dependent on application requirements – especially non-functional requirements related to bandwidth, latency, and reliability

Page 14: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

HomePlug/ZigBee Alliance Smart Energy Profile

• Application: Home Area Network (HAN) Device Communications and Information Model

• Actors: Meter / HAN Gateway, HAN Device• Interfaces: Multiple media – wireless and Power Line

Carrier (PLC)• Maturity: Initial release, has governance, has users

group, has certification and testing• Category: De facto, Open, Industry Consortia

Specification• Issues: Need to complete separation of information

model from technology specifics

Page 15: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

UtilityAMI 2008 HAN Systems Requirements Specification

• Application: Home Area Network device communication, measurement, and control

• Actors: Energy Service Interface, HAN Devices• Interfaces: Technology and GridWise Architecture

Council (GWAC) layers 1-3 independent• Maturity: First version, wide acceptance, has

governance, no certification or testing• Category: De facto, Open, Industry Consortia

Requirements Specification,• Issues: Planned for publication as an IEC Publicly

Available Specification

Page 16: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

Grid

Page 17: Smart The Grid Session 4 – Release One Standards – Low Hanging Fruit Objective: Build towards consensus on the existing and emerging standards that have

SmartThe

GridDefinitions of Open Standards

• References• [1] Microsoft Definition:  'standard' means a technology approved by formalized committees

that are open to participation by all interested parties and operate on a consensus basis. An open standard is publicly available, and developed, approved and maintained via a collaborative and consensus driven process

• [2] One of the most popular definitions of the term "open standard", as measured by Google ranking, is the one developed by Bruce Perens. [3] His definition lists a set of principles that he believes must be met by an open standard:

• Availability: Open Standards are available for all to read and implement. • Maximize End-User Choice: Open Standards create a fair, competitive market for

implementations of the standard. They do not lock the customer in to a particular vendor or group.

• No Royalty: Open Standards are free for all to implement, with no royalty or fee. Certification of compliance by the standards organization may involve a fee.

• No Discrimination: Open Standards and the organizations that administer them do not favor one implementor over another for any reason other than the technical standards compliance of a vendor’s implementation. Certification organizations must provide a path for low and zero-cost implementations to be validated, but may also provide enhanced certification services.

• Extension or Subset: Implementations of Open Standards may be extended, or offered in subset form. However, certification organizations may decline to certify subset implementations, and may place requirements upon extensions (see Predatory Practices).

• Predatory Practices: Open Standards may employ license terms that protect against subversion of the standard by embrace-and-extend tactics. The licenses attached to the standard may require the publication of reference information for extensions, and a license for all others to create, distribute, and sell software that is compatible with the extensions. An Open Standard may not otherwise prohibit extensions.

• [3]  Bruce Perens, http://perens.com/OpenStandards/