SMART 2013/007 First Interim Report: stocktaking of existing semantic assets

and se case assetsand use case assetsFrank den Hartog, Laura Daniele, Jack Verhoosel, Jasper RoesE-mail: frank.denhartog@tno.nlTel. +31 88 86 67 119

27 May 2014, DG CONNECT & ETSI Workshop on Smart Appliances

The EC “Semantics of Smart Appliances” project

Goal: Support ETSI SMART M2M as an organization. Provide the material needed to define the relevant tools and data models for the collection of devices that helps the EU to reach its 2020 goals regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas emission and buildings’ energy consumption. gy pTasks:1. Take stock of existing semantic assets and use case assets

2 Perform a translation exercise of each model or use case to a common

This is what wenow finished

2. Perform a translation exercise of each model or use case to a common

ontology language and subsequently a mapping between these models

3. Propose a common ontology and document it into ETSI M2M architecture

Ti i fi i h d i F b 2015Timing: finished in February 2015

R l d li blRelevant deliverablesMay 2014:

D S1 Fi t i t i t d t C i t k t ki ti it f T k 1 dD-S1 First interim study report: Covering stock-taking activity of Task 1 and

related semantic map

August 2014: D-S2 Second interim study report: Translation of assets to OWL and

mapping. Not exhaustive.

D-O1 OWL-files of semantic assetsD-O1 OWL-files of semantic assets

December 2014: D-S3 Third interim study report: Unified ontology, and how it fits in ETSI

M2M architecture

D-O2 Smart Appliances Unified Ontology

February 2015:February 2015: D-S4: Final study report: combining and updating previous study reports

March 2015: 1-day Workshop

ScopeDomains: Homes, private dwellings, common public buildings and offices

A li H d b ildi hit d HVACAppliances: Home and building sensors, white goods, HVAC, Lighting, Micro-renewable home solutions, Multimedia and PC equipment

Use cases: Interoperability with construction design tools, facility management systems, energy management systems, building control systems, ESCO systems, Smart GridStakeholders: manufacturers of white goods, HVAC, plumbing, g , , p g,security and electrical systems, lightings, sensors, actuators, micro-renewable home solutions, multimedia, and computers. And related industry, such

as utilities operators architects service providersas utilities, operators, architects, service providers...

Scope partly overlaps with m2m• Not in scope: m2m not related to energy management e.g. e-healthNot in scope: m2m not related to energy management e.g. e health• In scope: product behavior / properties classifications which are not about

how devices communicate with each other, e.g. BIM input

What is a semantic asset?

a source, specified by a URL, which presents a project, a set of documents, an ISO standard, a working group, a committee, a paper, a homepage (of a wiki, or of any other website) that is somehow related to energy management and/or home appliances. ppand may refer to one well-defined single ontology, but in most cases is a pointer to a set of multiple documents, several related standards and distinct articles on a web site or wiki from which a singleand distinct articles on a web site or wiki, from which a single ontology should be derived

Example of an assetOSGi Device Abstraction Layerhttps://github.com/osgi/design/blob/master/rfcs/rfc0196/rfc-0196-DeviceAbstractionLayer.pdf

2 id ifi d i h I i i T d27 assets identified in the Invitation to TenderFrom E2BA and the eeSemantics community:

FIEMSER Data Model for Monitoring & control network

Hydra

From CECED,eDiana (ARTEMIS) ontology for device discovery and

interoperability

ENERsip M2M Communications Infrastructure Modelling

Ontology

EDI-SERVICE,

EDI-WHITE,

IRIS

PIOntology

SmartCoDe EUP classification with respect to energy

management

TIBUCON

PI

From Lighting EuropeCEN/TC 169

CIE NewsletterSEEMPubS Ontology

SEIPF ontology

DEHEMS Digital Environment Home Energy Management

System project

International Lighting Vocabulary

buidlingSmart’s Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)

FIPAy p j

AIM*

Ebbits

SESAME Demonstrator

Li kS t t l i

Semantic Sensor Network Ontology (SSN)

CEN/CLC/ETSI Smart Grid CG M490

BACnet, KNX, LonWorks, and assets produced by LinkSmart ontologies

Adapt4EE

MIRABEL Flex

eeSemantics EupP VoCamP

Eu.bac and various CENELEC TCs

oBIX

SensorML

16 additional assets identified by TNO

ECHONET OMA Lightweight M2MECHONET

Broadband Forum

HGI

OMA Lightweight M2M

DECT ULE

SEP2 (Zigbee, HomePlug, Wi-Fi)

OSGi

UPnP

Energy@Home

Z-wave

Enocean

DLMS/COSEM

Agora

FAN

OMS

IETF CoAP

Total: 43Total: 43…

W h h li d 20 f hWe have short-listed 20 of them…

OSGi eDIANA DECT ULE

UPnP

Echonet

W3C SSN

SmartCoDE

SEEMPubs

SEIPF

FAN

FIPA

KNX

SEP2

Enocean

OMALightweightM2M

Hydra

FIEMSER

Mirabel

OMS

Z-Wave

OMALightweightM2M Mirabel

• “Short-listed” means: composed solely based on how well the asset is covering the scope of the project and if the asset provides concrete semanticthe scope of the project and if the asset provides concrete semantic specifications, preferably in the form of XML or OWL files.

• The short list does NOT signify anything about the relevance of the underlying technology for the industry or the market, nor any other commercially valuable

lifi ti O th t ll l li t d b di d j t h id d f lqualification. On the contrary, all long-listed bodies and projects have provided useful assets, if not in the form of ready-to-use XML or OWL files, such as use cases, low-level data-container specifications, and interoperability specifications.

All short-listed and most long-listed technologies have been described in DS-1 in terms of (1)have been described in DS 1 in terms of (1)

Model Acronym and Full NameMost relevant URLs, and other precise referencesOverall description

Technical context of the asset: application domain, system architecture,

protocol, etc.p ,

Including references to formal standards related to the asset

Description of the semantic coverageMain terminology used and their meaningMain terminology used and their meaning

Simple visual representation

All short-listed and most long-listed technologies have been described in DS-1 in terms of (2)have been described in DS 1 in terms of (2)

Overall description of the consensus driven process leading to the model, including a description of the relevant teams of developers, consultants, and subscribers or supporters

Who (which companies) actually developed the asset and who are the

promoter companies, in which context (R&D project, SDO, industry p p , ( p j , , y

consortium, etc.)

NO assessment of commercial success in the market, as this is not relevant

for the ontologyfor the ontology

Failed protocols may have good semantic assets that future more successful

protocols may use and learn from

Some recent assets may not yet be successful in the market but may become so in

the future

Long-listed assets which got only short descriptionsAgora (www.reseau-domiciliaire.fr)

Industry consortium succeeding very well so far in using existing assets to create integrated heterogeneous systems for

smart services

AIM* (www.ict-aim.eu)European 7th Framework R&D project fostering a harmonised technology for profiling and managing the energy

consumption of appliances at home but without creating own semantics

CEN/CLC/ETSI Smart Grid CG M490 (ftp://ftp cen eu/EN/EuropeanStandardization/HotTopics/SmartGrids/)CEN/CLC/ETSI Smart Grid CG M490 (ftp://ftp.cen.eu/EN/EuropeanStandardization/HotTopics/SmartGrids/)Reference SG architecture and list of applicable standards, including gap analysis. No additional semantic assets identified

up and above our list.

CoAP (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/ Novel protocol for IoT IPv6 networks, but semantics still under development

ENERsip: (https://sites.google.com/a/enersip-project.eu/enersip-project/results/deliverables/wp3)European 7th Framework R&D project creating a platform that allows end users to optimise and save energy by

di ti l l d i l ti d ti S ti t t bli h dcoordinating local and regional power generation and consumption. Semantic assets not published.

eu.bac (www.eubac.org)European Building Automation Controls Association with broad mission, including certifying Home Controls and Building

automation Controllers against semantic interoperability of assets already discussed elsewhere in DS-1g p y y

VoCamp (http://vocamp.org)Series of events. At one of them (June 2013), scientific foundations for standardization of M2M communication for energy

management of EupPs were discussed, but presentations have not yet been uploaded to the website.

S l i f DS 1Some conclusions of DS-1We have identified 43 semantic assets that need to be included in our study given the scope as set out by the European Commission.study given the scope as set out by the European Commission. We were able to short-list 20 which provide a good basis for further common ontology development. The considered assets form a heterogeneous set when consideringThe considered assets form a heterogeneous set when considering their semantic coverage. Three main trends can be identified

Devices, sensors and their specs in terms of services, functions and states

Energy consumption information and profiles to optimize energy efficiency

Buildings related semantic models

Other classifications could be made too (e.g. FP7 vs SDOs, or protocol vs product information), but they are not relevant for further ontology developmentde e op eSome of the considered assets do not provide sufficient information and/or documentation to define their semantic coverage

Future work Future work on ontology development will be explained by Lauraexplained by Laura Daniele tomorrowMapping into ETSI M2M

hiCommon ontology ->

architectureD-S4 (Final study report:

combining and updating

M2M API

previous study reports)

decided by ETSI Smart M2M

TC to become an ETSI TS

with as little as possible

adaptations

Continued alignment with work

Common ontology -> M2M API

DS 1 Continued alignment with work

done in OneM2MCommon

ontology -> M2M API

DS-1