Smaller Sooner ASP

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    1/16

    1ASP Whyte June 2012

    Smaller & Sooner:How a new generation of

    superconductors can accelerate

    fusions development

    Dennis WhyteMIT Nuclear Science & Engineering

    Plasma Science Fusion CenterJune 2012

    American Security ProjectFusion Energy Workshop

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    2/16

    2ASP Whyte June 2012

    Fusions development is impeded by itslarge single-unit cost

    The overnight cost of a ssion power plant is ~ $4/W.

    First of kind fusion plants at least $10-20/W

    Which implies that developing fusion reactors at ~GWe scalerequires 10-20 G$ per try.

    Chance of fusion development signicantly improved if net thermal/ electrical power produced at ~5-10 x smaller.

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    3/16

    3ASP Whyte June 2012

    Fusion at smaller size requires highermagnetic elds

    What do you need? High energy gain ~ ignited Robustly steady-state as far as

    possible from physics limits

    Linear size ~ R Volume ~ Cost ~ R 3

    Magnetic eld strength ~ B

    Connement quality, H, cannot bebudged much The safety factor q>3, or as high

    as possible since suddenterminations of plasma areunacceptable for materials

    H

    q R B C

    Ignition requirement

    $$ 1 / B 3

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    4/16

    4ASP Whyte June 2012

    Economically efcient fusion reactorsrequire higher magnetic elds with

    ~loss-free superconductors Stability parameter, Beta, hasknown intrinsic limits

    Limits must be avoided since, unlike in present devices, violationleads to probable end-of-lifedamage to internal components

    Solution in present designs? Violatethe intrinsic stability limit by factorof two!

    $ IN $ OUT

    ~P

    Fusion

    Volume~

    2 B 4

    Power produced per unit cost

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    5/16

    5ASP Whyte June 2012

    Economically efcient fusion reactorsrequire higher magnetic elds with

    ~loss-free superconductors Stability parameter, Beta, hasknown intrinsic limits

    Limits must be avoided since, unlike in present devices, violationleads to probable end-of-lifedamage to internal components

    Solution in present designs? Violatethe intrinsic stability limit by factorof two!

    Transiently demonstrated buttaking very high risk to end-of-lifeof very costly and difcult to repairinternal components

    $ IN

    $ OUT ~

    PFusion

    Volume~

    2 B 4

    Power produced per unit cost

    The way out of this contradiction is high B eld..

    B 2 R

    Damage to components fromViolating operating limits

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    6/16

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    7/16

    7ASP Whyte June 2012

    New high-T superconductors can provide thepath to smaller & sooner fusion:

    Higher B + Detachable coils

    Can nearly double B (up tostress limits of structure)

    Sub-cooled YBCO tapes

    R/2 Volume/8 $/8 !

    Away from operating limits

    Small tape-to-tape joints coils can be demounted

    Eliminate sector (pie-wedge)maintenance

    Modular replacement of smaller internal parts

    More easily constructed and maintained fusiondevice at small size but with reliable high gain

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    8/16

    8ASP Whyte June 2012

    Recent MIT Design Effort*Rules

    Develop a robust conceptual design based on YBCO magnetsof a high gain, net electricity producing magnetic fusion powerplant at substantially reduced total thermal power ~ 500 MW(factor of ~5 reduction from typical designs).

    No violation of basic core limits: kink, no-wall Troyon Beta, Greenwald to assure stable operation.

    Fully non-inductive scenarios but robust external control Minimize solid waste Minimize capital cost ~ Surface area of plasma/blanket to assure

    best fusion economic outlook. Q_electric > 4

    *22.63 MIT fusion design course Spring 2012

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    9/16

    9ASP Whyte June 2012

    Key innovations towardsachieving design goals

    Integrated YBCO +structure to achieve9.2 T on axis withoutlarge electrical costs

    R=3.2 m

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    10/16

    10ASP Whyte June 2012

    Key innovations towardsachieving design goals

    Demountable coils Modular replacementof vacuum vessel +components fulloff-site construction+ QA of all internalcomponents

    No connection evermade inside TF= Paradigm shift tostandard sectormaintenance

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    11/16

    11ASP Whyte June 2012

    Key innovations towardsachieving design goals

    Immersion liquidFLIBE blanket Nomaterials radiationdamage in blanket ~50-fold reduction insolid waste fullcoverage high-TBR

    blanket

    FLIBE

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    12/16

    12ASP Whyte June 2012

    Demountable coils Attractiveliquid immersion blanket

    Key Features

    Tritium breeding ratio: 1.15Excess T in FPY: ~3 kg

    High thermal efciencyLow recirculating power

    30+ year lifetime of coils fromradiation damage

    Solid waste reduced x50compared to standard blanket

    Liquid FLIBE@ 900 K

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    13/16

    13ASP Whyte June 2012

    Key innovations towardsachieving design goals

    Lower Hybrid CDwith high-eld sidelaunch neartheoretical max. forCD efciency at mid-radius ~20%external control of

    current prole

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    14/16

    14ASP Whyte June 2012

    Inside RF launch robust theoretical max.sustainment ~3-4x more external control

    Enabled by- high B- compact size

    =10 keV

    Provides only ~4% of plasma heating but~20% of plasmacurrent.

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    15/16

    15ASP Whyte June 2012

    Key innovations towardsachieving design goals

    ~4 keV pedestal notregulated by ELMs + high CD efciency high fusion gainwith moderatebootstrap fraction= Robust steady-state

    scenarios producing~250 MWe

  • 7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP

    16/16