View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
1/16
1ASP Whyte June 2012
Smaller & Sooner:How a new generation of
superconductors can accelerate
fusions development
Dennis WhyteMIT Nuclear Science & Engineering
Plasma Science Fusion CenterJune 2012
American Security ProjectFusion Energy Workshop
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
2/16
2ASP Whyte June 2012
Fusions development is impeded by itslarge single-unit cost
The overnight cost of a ssion power plant is ~ $4/W.
First of kind fusion plants at least $10-20/W
Which implies that developing fusion reactors at ~GWe scalerequires 10-20 G$ per try.
Chance of fusion development signicantly improved if net thermal/ electrical power produced at ~5-10 x smaller.
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
3/16
3ASP Whyte June 2012
Fusion at smaller size requires highermagnetic elds
What do you need? High energy gain ~ ignited Robustly steady-state as far as
possible from physics limits
Linear size ~ R Volume ~ Cost ~ R 3
Magnetic eld strength ~ B
Connement quality, H, cannot bebudged much The safety factor q>3, or as high
as possible since suddenterminations of plasma areunacceptable for materials
H
q R B C
Ignition requirement
$$ 1 / B 3
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
4/16
4ASP Whyte June 2012
Economically efcient fusion reactorsrequire higher magnetic elds with
~loss-free superconductors Stability parameter, Beta, hasknown intrinsic limits
Limits must be avoided since, unlike in present devices, violationleads to probable end-of-lifedamage to internal components
Solution in present designs? Violatethe intrinsic stability limit by factorof two!
$ IN $ OUT
~P
Fusion
Volume~
2 B 4
Power produced per unit cost
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
5/16
5ASP Whyte June 2012
Economically efcient fusion reactorsrequire higher magnetic elds with
~loss-free superconductors Stability parameter, Beta, hasknown intrinsic limits
Limits must be avoided since, unlike in present devices, violationleads to probable end-of-lifedamage to internal components
Solution in present designs? Violatethe intrinsic stability limit by factorof two!
Transiently demonstrated buttaking very high risk to end-of-lifeof very costly and difcult to repairinternal components
$ IN
$ OUT ~
PFusion
Volume~
2 B 4
Power produced per unit cost
The way out of this contradiction is high B eld..
B 2 R
Damage to components fromViolating operating limits
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
6/16
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
7/16
7ASP Whyte June 2012
New high-T superconductors can provide thepath to smaller & sooner fusion:
Higher B + Detachable coils
Can nearly double B (up tostress limits of structure)
Sub-cooled YBCO tapes
R/2 Volume/8 $/8 !
Away from operating limits
Small tape-to-tape joints coils can be demounted
Eliminate sector (pie-wedge)maintenance
Modular replacement of smaller internal parts
More easily constructed and maintained fusiondevice at small size but with reliable high gain
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
8/16
8ASP Whyte June 2012
Recent MIT Design Effort*Rules
Develop a robust conceptual design based on YBCO magnetsof a high gain, net electricity producing magnetic fusion powerplant at substantially reduced total thermal power ~ 500 MW(factor of ~5 reduction from typical designs).
No violation of basic core limits: kink, no-wall Troyon Beta, Greenwald to assure stable operation.
Fully non-inductive scenarios but robust external control Minimize solid waste Minimize capital cost ~ Surface area of plasma/blanket to assure
best fusion economic outlook. Q_electric > 4
*22.63 MIT fusion design course Spring 2012
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
9/16
9ASP Whyte June 2012
Key innovations towardsachieving design goals
Integrated YBCO +structure to achieve9.2 T on axis withoutlarge electrical costs
R=3.2 m
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
10/16
10ASP Whyte June 2012
Key innovations towardsachieving design goals
Demountable coils Modular replacementof vacuum vessel +components fulloff-site construction+ QA of all internalcomponents
No connection evermade inside TF= Paradigm shift tostandard sectormaintenance
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
11/16
11ASP Whyte June 2012
Key innovations towardsachieving design goals
Immersion liquidFLIBE blanket Nomaterials radiationdamage in blanket ~50-fold reduction insolid waste fullcoverage high-TBR
blanket
FLIBE
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
12/16
12ASP Whyte June 2012
Demountable coils Attractiveliquid immersion blanket
Key Features
Tritium breeding ratio: 1.15Excess T in FPY: ~3 kg
High thermal efciencyLow recirculating power
30+ year lifetime of coils fromradiation damage
Solid waste reduced x50compared to standard blanket
Liquid FLIBE@ 900 K
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
13/16
13ASP Whyte June 2012
Key innovations towardsachieving design goals
Lower Hybrid CDwith high-eld sidelaunch neartheoretical max. forCD efciency at mid-radius ~20%external control of
current prole
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
14/16
14ASP Whyte June 2012
Inside RF launch robust theoretical max.sustainment ~3-4x more external control
Enabled by- high B- compact size
=10 keV
Provides only ~4% of plasma heating but~20% of plasmacurrent.
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
15/16
15ASP Whyte June 2012
Key innovations towardsachieving design goals
~4 keV pedestal notregulated by ELMs + high CD efciency high fusion gainwith moderatebootstrap fraction= Robust steady-state
scenarios producing~250 MWe
7/31/2019 Smaller Sooner ASP
16/16