Upload
kimsr
View
268
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2-1
Analyzing a Company’s Resources and Competitive Position
4444Chapter
“Before executives
can chart a new
strategy, they must
reach common
understanding of
the company’s
current position.”W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne
A SWOT Analysis A SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool
used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture or in any other situation requiring a decision. The technique is credited to Albert Humphrey,
who led a research project at Stanford University in the 1960s and 70's, using data from the Fortune 500 companies.
Strengths are attributes of the organization that are helpful to the achievement of the objective.
Weaknesses are attributes of the organization that are harmful to the achievement of the objective.
Opportunities are external conditions that are helpful to the achievement of the objective.
Threats are external conditions that are harmful to the achievement of the objective.
1. How can we Use each Strength?
2. How can we Stop each Weakness?
3. How can we Exploit each Opportunity?
4. How can we Defend against each Threat?
Possible examplesStrengths and Weaknesses Resources: financial, intellectual, location Customer Service Efficiency Competitive Advantages Infrastructure Quality Staff Management Price
Opportunities and Threats
Competitors' actions Economic conditions Interest rates Increasing market saturation Changes in laws and
regulations
Distribution Channels and Hours of operations
After sales service and Sales promotion techniques
Transportation and Delivery time Diversified fields,
Product line and multiple services/offers (Technical, Commercial, Designing & Turnkey Projects etc )
The required first step in SWOT analysis is the definition of the desired end state or objective. The definition of objective must be explicit and approved by all participants in the process.
This first step must be performed carefully because failure to identify correctly the end state aimed for leads to wasted resources and possibly failure of the enterprise.
2-10
SWOT AnalysisManagers need to analyze
The general environmentThe firm’s industry and competitive environment
SWOT analysisStrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreatsBasic technique for analyzing firm and industry conditions
Company Situation Analysis:The Key Questions
1. How well is the company’spresent strategy working?
2. What are the company’s resourcestrengths and weaknesses and itsexternal opportunities and threats?
3. Are the company’s prices andcosts competitive?
4. Is the company competitively strongeror weaker than key rivals?
5. What strategic issues meritfront-burner managerial attention?
Q #1: How Well Is the Company’s Present Strategy Working?
Identify competitive approach Low-cost leadership Differentiation Focus on a particular market niche
Determine competitive scope Geographic market coverage Operating stages in industry’s production/distribution
chain
Examine recent strategic moves Identify functional strategies
Key Issues
Approaches to Assess How Well the Present Strategy Is Working
Qualitative assessment –What is the strategy?
Completeness
Internal consistency
Rationale
Relevance
Quantitative assessment – What are the results? Is company achieving its
financial and strategic objectives?
Is company an above-average industry performer?
Key Indicators of How Wellthe Strategy Is Working
Trend in sales and market share Acquiring and/or retaining customers Trend in profit margins Trend in net profits, ROI, and EVA Overall financial strength and credit ranking Efforts at continuous improvement activities Trend in stock price and stockholder value Image and reputation with customers Leadership role(s) – Technology, quality,
innovation, e-commerce, etc.
S W O TS W O T represents the first letter in SS trengths WW eaknesses OO pportunities TT hreats
For a company’s strategy to be well-conceived, it must be Matched to its resource strengths and
weaknesses Aimed at capturing its best market opportunities
and erecting defenses against external threats to its well-being
S W
O T
Q #2: What Are the Company’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats ?
Identifying Resource Strengthsand Competitive Capabilities A strength is something a firm does well or an
attribute that enhances its competitiveness Valuable competencies or know-how Valuable physical assets Valuable human assets Valuable organizational assets Valuable intangible assets Important competitive capabilities An attribute that places a company in a position of
market advantage Alliances or cooperative ventures with partners
Resource strengths and competitivecapabilities are competitive assets!
Competencies vs. Core Competencies vs. Distinctive Competencies
A competence is the product of organizational learning and experience and represents real proficiency in performing an internal activity
A core competence is a well-performedinternal activity central (not peripheral or incidental)to a company’s competitiveness and profitability
A distinctive competence is a competitively valuable activity a company performs better than its rivals
Company Competenciesand Capabilities
Stem from skills, expertise, and experience usually representing an Accumulation of learning over time and Gradual buildup of real proficiency in
performing an activity Involve deliberate efforts to develop the ability to
do something, often entailing Selecting people with requisite knowledge and skills Upgrading or expanding individual abilities Molding work products of individuals into a cooperative
effort to create organizational ability A conscious effort to create intellectual capital
A competence becomes a core competence when the well-performed activity is central to a company’s competitiveness and profitability
Often, a core competence results from collaboration among different parts of a company
Typically, core competencies reside in a company’s people, not in assets on a balance sheet
A core competence gives a company apotentially valuable competitive capabilityand represents a definite competitive asset
Core Competencies -- AValuable Company Resource
Examples: Core Competencies
Expertise in integrating multiple technologiesto create families of new products
Know-how in creating operating systemsfor cost efficient supply chain management
Speeding new/next-generation products to market
Better after-sale service capability
Skills in manufacturing a high quality product
System to fill customer orders accurately and swiftly
Distinctive Competence -- ACompetitively Superior Resource
A distinctive competence is a competitively significant activity that a company performs better than its competitors
A distinctive competence Represents a competitively valuable
capability rivals do not have Presents attractive potential for
being a cornerstone of strategy Can provide a competitive edge in the marketplace —
because it represents a competitively superior resource strength
# 1
Examples: Distinctive Competencies
Sharp Corporation Expertise in flat-panel display technology
Toyota and Honda Low-cost, high-quality manufacturing
capability and short design-to-market cycles Intel
Ability to design and manufactureever more powerful microprocessors for PCs
Wal-Mart Low-cost distribution and use of
state-of-the-art retail technology
To qualify as competitively valuable or to be the basis for sustainable competitive advantage, a “resource” must pass 4 tests:
1. Is the resource hard to copy?
2. Does the resource have staying power – is it durable?
3. Is the resource really competitively superior?
4. Can the resource be trumped by the different capabilities of rivals?
Determining the CompetitiveValue of a Company ResourceDetermining the CompetitiveValue of a Company Resource
A weakness is something a firm lacks, does poorly, or a condition placing it at a disadvantage
Resource weaknesses relate to Inferior or unproven skills,
expertise, or intellectual capital Lack of important physical,
organizational, or intangible assets Missing capabilities in key areasResource weaknesses and deficiencies
are competitive liabilities!
Identifying Resource Weaknessesand Competitive DeficienciesIdentifying Resource Weaknessesand Competitive Deficiencies
Opportunities most relevant to acompany are those offering
Good match with its financial andorganizational resource capabilities
Best prospects for profitable long-term growth
Potential for competitive advantage
Identifying a Company’sMarket OpportunitiesIdentifying a Company’sMarket Opportunities
Identifying External Threats Emergence of cheaper/better technologies Introduction of better products by rivals Entry of lower-cost foreign competitors Onerous regulations Rise in interest rates Potential of a hostile takeover Unfavorable demographic shifts Adverse shifts in foreign exchange rates Political upheaval in a country
Role of SWOT Analysis inCrafting a Better Strategy The most important part of S W O TS W O T analysis is not
developing the 4 lists of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, but rather
Using the 4 lists to draw conclusionsabout a company’s overall situation and
Acting on the conclusions to
Better match a company’s strategy to itsresource strengths and market opportunities,
Correct the important weaknesses, and
Defend against external threats
Fig. 4.2: The Three Stepsof SWOT Analysis
Q #4: Are the Company’sPrices and Costs Competitive? Assessing whether a firm’s costs are competitive
with those of rivals is a crucial part of company analysis
Key analytical tools
Value chain analysis
Benchmarking
The Concept of aCompany Value Chain A company’s business consists of all activities
undertaken in designing, producing, marketing, delivering, and supporting its product or service
A company’s value chain consists of a linked set of value-creating activities performed internally
The value chain contains two types of activities Primary activities – where most of
the value for customers is created
Support activities – facilitateperformance of the primary activities
Fig. 4.3: RepresentativeCompany Value Chain
Characteristics of Value Chain Analysis Combined costs of all activities in a company’s value
chain define the company’s internal cost structure
Compares a firm’s costs activityby activity against costs of key rivals
From raw materials purchase to
Price paid by ultimate customer
Pinpoints which internal activities are asource of cost advantage or disadvantage
Why Do ValueChains of Rivals Differ? Several factors can cause differences
in value chains of rival companies
Internal operations
Strategy
Approaches used in execution of the strategy
Underlying economics of the activities
Differences complicate task of assessingrivals’ relative cost positions
The Value Chain Systemfor an Entire Industry Assessing a company’s cost competitiveness
involves comparing costs all along the industry’s value chain
Suppliers’ value chains are relevant because Costs, performance features, and quality of inputs
provided by suppliers influence a firm’s own costsand product performance
Forward channel allies’ value chains are relevant because Costs and margins are part of price paid
by ultimate end-user Activities performed affect end-user satisfaction
Fig. 4.4: Representative Value Chain for an Entire Industry
Example: Value Chain Activities
Timber farming
Logging
Pulp mills
Papermaking
Distribution
Pulp & Paper Industry
Home Appliance Industry
Parts and components manufacture
Assembly
Wholesale distribution
Retail sales
Example: Value Chain ActivitiesExample: Value Chain Activities
Processing of basic ingredients
Syrup manufacture
Bottling and can filling
Wholesale distribution
Advertising
Retailing
Albertson’s
Example: Value Chain ActivitiesExample: Value Chain ActivitiesSoft Drink Industry
Programming
Disk loading
Marketing
Distribution
Example: Value Chain ActivitiesExample: Value Chain Activities
Software Computer Industry
Developing Data to Measure a Company’s Cost Competitiveness
After identifying key value chain activities, the next step involves breaking down departmental cost accounting data into costs of performing specific activities
Appropriate degree of disaggregation depends on Economics of activities Value of comparing narrowly defined
versus broadly defined activities
Guideline – Develop separate cost estimates for activities Having different economics Representing a significant or growing proportion of costs
Activity-Based Costing: A KeyTool in Analyzing Costs Determining whether a company’s costs are in line
with those of rivals requires Measuring how a company’s costs compare with those of
rivals activity-by-activity Requires having accounting data to measure cost
of each value chain activity Activity-based costing entails
Defining expense categories accordingto specific activities performed and
Assigning costs to the activityresponsible for creating the cost
Benchmarking Costs ofKey Value Chain Activities Focuses on cross-company comparisons of how
certain activities are performed and costs associated with these activities Purchase of materials Payment of suppliers Management of inventories Getting new products to market Performance of quality control Filling and shipping of customer orders Training of employees Processing of payrolls
Objectives of Benchmarking
Identify best practices in performing an activity
Understand the best practices in performingan activity – learn what is the “best” wayto do a particular activity from thosedemonstrating they are “best-in-world”
Learn how other firms achieve lower costs
Take action to improve company’s cost competitiveness
Ethical Standards in Benchmarking: Do’s and Don’ts
Avoid talk about pricing or competitively sensitive costs
Don’t ask rivals for sensitive data
Don’t share proprietary data without clearance
Have impartial third party assemble and present competitively sensitive cost data with no names attached
Don’t disparage a rival’s business to outsiders based on data obtained
What Determines if aCompany Is Cost Competitive?
Cost competitiveness depends on how well a company manages its value chain relative to how well competitors manage their value chains
When costs are out-of-line, high-cost activities can exist in any of three areas in the industry value chain 1. Suppliers’ activities
2. Company’s own internal activities
3. Forward channel activitiesActivities, Costs, &
Margins ofForward
Channel Allies
InternallyPerformedActivities, Costs, &Margins
Activities, Costs, &
Margins ofSuppliers
Buyer/UserValue
Chains
Translating Performance of Value Chain Activities to Competitive Advantage A company can create competitive
advantage by managing its value chain to
Integrate knowledge and skills of employees in competitively valuable ways
Leverage economies of learning / experience
Coordinate related activities in waysthat build valuable capabilities
Build dominating expertisein a value chain activity criticalto customer satisfaction or market success
Fig. 4.5: Translating Performance of Value Chain Activities into Competitive Advantage
Q. #4: Is the Company Stronger or Weaker than Key Rivals?
Overall competitive position involvesanswering two questions
How does a company rank relativeto competitors on each importantfactor that determines market success?
Does a company have a netcompetitive advantage or disadvantagevis-à-vis major competitors?
Assessing a Company’s Competitive Strength vs. Key Rivals
1. List industry key success factors and other relevant measures of competitive strength
2. Rate firm and key rivals on each factor using rating scale of 1 to 10 (1 = very weak; 5 = average; 10 = very strong)
3. Decide whether to use a weighted or unweighted rating system (a weighted system is superior because chosen strength measures are unlikely to be equally important)
4. Sum individual ratings to get an overall measure of competitive strength for each rival
5. Based on overall strength ratings, determine overall competitive position of firm
Why Do a CompetitiveStrength Assessment ? Reveals strength of firm’s competitive position
vis-à-vis key rivals Shows how firm stacks up against rivals, measure-by-
measure – pinpoints firm’s competitive strengths and competitive weaknesses
Indicates whether firm is at a competitive advantage / disadvantage against each rival
Identifies possible offensive attacks (pit company strengths against rivals’ weaknesses)
Identifies possible defensive actions (a need to correct competitive weaknesses)
What Strategic IssuesMerit Managerial Attention?
Based on results of both industry and competitive analysis and an evaluation of a company’s competitiveness, what items should beon a company’s “worry list”?
Requires thinking strategically about Pluses and minuses in the industry
and competitive situation Company’s resource strengths and weaknesses
and attractiveness of its competitive positionA “good” strategy must address “what to do”
about each and every strategic issue!
Identifying the Strategic Issues
How to stave off market challenges from new foreign competitors?
How to combat price discounting of rivals? How to reduce a company’s high costs? How to sustain a company’s present growth
in light of slowing buyer demand? Whether to expand a company’s product line? Whether to acquire a rival firm? Whether to expand into foreign markets rapidly or cautiously? What to do about aging demographics of a company’s
customer base?
A well-stated issue involves such phrases as “How to . . . ?” “Whether to . . . ?” “What should be done about . . . ?”
Issues need to be precise, specific, and “cut straight to the chase”
Issues on the “the worry list”raise questions about What actions need to be considered What to think about doing
Stating the IssuesClearly and PreciselyStating the IssuesClearly and Precisely
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
dIn
bou
nd
L
ogis
tics
Log
isti
cs
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
ProcurementProcurement
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
ProcurementProcurement
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
ProcurementProcurement
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Firm InfrastructureFirm Infrastructure
ProcurementProcurement
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Firm InfrastructureFirm Infrastructure
ProcurementProcurement
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
MARG
IN
MARG
IN
MARGIN
MARGIN
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain AnalysisIdentifying Resources and Capabilities That Can Add Value
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
OutsourcingOutsourcing
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Firm InfrastructureFirm Infrastructure
ProcurementProcurement
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
MARG
IN
MARG
IN
MARGIN
MARGIN
Strategic Choice to Purchase Some Activities From Outside Suppliers
SupportActivities
Primary Activities
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
Firm InfrastructureFirm Infrastructure
ProcurementProcurement
Inb
oun
d
Inb
oun
d
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Ou
tbou
nd
Ou
tbou
nd
Log
isti
csL
ogis
tics
Mar
ket
ing
Mar
ket
ing
& S
ales
& S
ales
Ser
vice
Ser
vice
MARG
IN
MARG
IN
Inbound Inbound LogisticsLogistics
OperationsOperationsOutboundOutboundLogisticsLogistics
ServiceService
Marketing Marketing & Sales& Sales
Technological DevelopmentTechnological Development
Human Resource ManagementHuman Resource Management
ProcurementProcurement
MARGIN
MARGIN
Firms often purchase a portionportion of their value-creating activities from specialty external suppliers who can perform these functions more efficientlymore efficiently
OutsourcingOutsourcingStrategic Choice to Purchase Some Activities From Outside Suppliers
Lets company focus on broader business issues by having outside experts handle various operational detailsLets company focus on broader business issues by having outside experts handle various operational details
Strategic Rationales for OutsourcingStrategic Rationales for Outsourcing
Improve Business FocusImprove Business Focus
Permits firm to redirect efforts from non-core activities toward those that serve customers more effectivelyPermits firm to redirect efforts from non-core activities toward those that serve customers more effectively
Free Resources for Other PurposesFree Resources for Other Purposes
Provide Access to World-Class CapabilitiesProvide Access to World-Class Capabilities
Accelerate Business Re-Engineering BenefitsAccelerate Business Re-Engineering Benefits
Share RisksShare Risks
The specialized resources of outsourcing providers makes world-class capabilities available to firms in a wide range of applications The specialized resources of outsourcing providers makes world-class capabilities available to firms in a wide range of applications
Achieves re-engineering benefits more quickly by having outsiders--who have already achieved world-class standards--take over processAchieves re-engineering benefits more quickly by having outsiders--who have already achieved world-class standards--take over process
Reduces investment requirements and makes firm more flexible, dynamic and better able to adapt to changing opportunities Reduces investment requirements and makes firm more flexible, dynamic and better able to adapt to changing opportunities
Core Competencies--Cautions and RemindersCore Competencies--Cautions and Reminders
Never take for granted that core competencies will continue to provide a source of competitive advantageNever take for granted that core competencies will continue to provide a source of competitive advantage
All core competencies have the potential to become Core RigiditiesAll core competencies have the potential to become Core Rigidities
Core Rigidities are former core competencies that sow the seeds of organizational inertia and prevent the firm from responding appropriately to changes in the external environment
Core Rigidities are former core competencies that sow the seeds of organizational inertia and prevent the firm from responding appropriately to changes in the external environment
Strategic myopia and inflexibility can strangle the firm’s ability to grow and adapt to environmental change or competitive threats
Strategic myopia and inflexibility can strangle the firm’s ability to grow and adapt to environmental change or competitive threats
ResourcesResources
** TangibleTangible** IntangibleIntangible
CapabilitiesCapabilities
Teams of ResourcesTeams of Resources
Sources ofSources of
CoreCoreCompetenciesCompetencies
CompetitiveCompetitiveAdvantageAdvantage
StrategicStrategicCompetitivenessCompetitiveness
Above-AverageAbove-AverageReturnsReturns
CompetitiveCompetitiveAdvantageAdvantage
Gained throughGained throughCore CompetenciesCore Competencies
DiscoveringDiscoveringCoreCore
CompetenciesCompetencies
ValueChain
Analysis
ValuableRareCostly to ImitateNonsubstitutable
****
* Outsource
Criteria ofSustainableAdvantages
Discovering Core CompetenciesDiscovering Core Competencies