Upload
robert-e-leaver
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sludge Disposal Practices in the Pacific NorthwestAuthor(s): Robert E. LeaverSource: Sewage and Industrial Wastes, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Mar., 1956), pp. 323-328Published by: Water Environment FederationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25033026 .
Accessed: 15/06/2014 01:47
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Water Environment Federation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Sewageand Industrial Wastes.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
THE OPERATOR'S CORNER Conducted by Donald P. Schiesswohl
SLUDGE DISPOSAL PRACTICES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST *
By Robert E. Leaver
Senior Public Health Engineer, Washington State Department of Health,
Seattle, Wash.
The disposal of sludge from a sew
age treatment plant receives operator comment whether the plant is large or
small. Disposal methods vary from the small treatment plant with an an
nual drying of sludge on the drying beds to the large treatment facility located on the seacoast, where sludge is barged to sea in special tankers.
The sludge disposed of may be raw or digested; a liquid or a dried solid.
When digested its public health sig nificance is less critical and, when
properly treated, dried sludge is as
safe to handle as a commercial ferti lizer.
At the majority of sewage treatment
plants sludge disposal is a problem to some degree and it is a necessary op
erating expense at all treatment fa cilities. Methods of sludge disposal and the financial burden entailed were
studied for several municipalities in
the Pacific Northwest, principally in
the state of Washington.
Comparative Value of Fertilizers
To better understand the problem involved in the disposal of sludge it is
well to consider the fertilizer value of
* Presented at the 1955 Annual Meeting,
Pacific Northwest Sewage and Industrial
Wastes Assn.; Victoria, B. C; Oct. 27-29, 1955.
available organic fertilizers and their cost. The fertilizing ingredients in
sewage sludges, various manures and
organic nitrogenous material are pre sented in Table I. Digested sludge, in
general, is about equivalent in fertiliz
ing value to manure. In Seattle, Wash., manure costs approximately
$6.50 per yard or $16.60 per ton, based on a dry weight of 1,300 lb. per yard and a 60 per cent moisture content.
Humus sells for $2.00 per yard when
picked up at the pit, or approximately $5.10 per ton on a dry weight basis. The heat dried activated sludge, Mil
organite, sells for $4.55 in 80 lb. sacks or the equivalent of $114 per ton, dry
weight. The major portion of this cost is due to transportation charges. The
Milorganite returns $33.64 per ton,
wholesale, at the treatment plant in
Milwaukee, Wis.
Sludge Disposal Methods
The principal methods of digested
sludge disposal in the state of Wash
ington and adjacent states utilize
sludge drying beds, tank trucks, vacuum filters and lagooning. The heat
drying of sludge is not generally
practiced nor are there any installa tions incinerating the sludge as a
method of disposal. Most of the sludge 323
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
324 SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES March, 1956
TABLE I.?Fertilizing Ingredients in Sewage Sludges, Various Manures and Organic Nitrogenous Materials
Material Fertilizing Ingredient1 (%)
Nitrogen (N) Phosphoric Acid Potash Organic Matter
Digested settled sludge Digested settled sludge with"trickling
filter sludge
Digested activated sludge Heat dried-activated sludge Commercial pulverized
Sheep manure
Cattle manure
Poultry manure
Animal tankage Blood Fish scrap Cottonseed meal
Castor pomace
0.8-3.5
1.0-4.5
2.0-4.8
4.0-7.0
1.2-2.5
1.6-2.1
1.9-4.0
5-10
9-13
6.5-10
5-8
5-6
0.7-4.02
tr.-4.02
1.0-3.62
1.7-2.5
1.0-2.0
1.0
2.5-3.7
7-16
0.5-14
5-10
2-3
2
0.8-1.62
0.13
2.0-4.0
1.0-2.2
0.8-1.3
1-2
1
30-603'<
48
66
64
^eeref. 1. 2 Dry basis. 3 Estimated from other tables. 4 Volatile matter.
is given away to anyone who will haul it from the drying or dump area.
Liquid Sludge
Liquid digested sludge is usually re
moved from the sewage treatment
plant by private contractor or mu
nicipal tank truck. The following ex
amples are typical of current practice. Olympia, Wash., population 17,000,
has a contract with a nurseryman and receives approximately $4.80 per ton on a dry weight basis. The contractor
gets the liquid digested sludge at the treatment plant in his own tank truck for $2.00 per 1,000 gal. load. The contract requires that the nurseryman take the total annual production of
sludge as it becomes digested (less than 40 per cent volatile solids). The con
tractor apparently is well pleased with
the arrangement and the results he
gets from spreading the sludge on land
used for growing shrubs and other
nursery stock. A five-mile round trip is necessary.
Chehalis, Wash., population 5,630, took bids for the period May 1, 1953 to May 1, 1954 on the hauling of di
gested sludge. The award was made to a contractor who submitted a bid of $400 per year. The wet sludge is
picked up at the treatment plant and the contractor must meet all require
ments of the state health department. Approximately 142,000 gal. of sludge with a 7 per cent total solids content
and 35 to 50 per cent volatile solids were used in 1954, primarily for hay crops. The revenue received averages
approximately $10 per ton on a dry weight basis.
Issaquah, Wash., population 1,200, has an arrangement with a local farmer for hauling liquid digested sludge as it becomes digested. Ap proximately 15,000 gal. of thin sludge is disposed of every six weeks. The
farmer makes no charge for hauling nor does the city receive any revenue.
In less than one year the hay fields re
ceiving the sludge have improved crop
production from poor to excellent.
Shelton, Wash., population 5,250, has hauled liquid digested sludge in a
city-owned truck only once since the
treatment plant was placed in opera tion in 1951. Although there are no
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Vol. 28, No. 3 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 325
sludge drying beds available, the di
gester has had ample storage capacity and private haulers have taken most
of the available sludge.
Air-Dried Digested Sludge
Drying of digested sludge on drying beds has been an accepted method of
dewatering sludge for many years. The problem of disposing of the dried
sludge still remains, and today the cost
is increased due to the steady rise in
labor costs.
Typical methods of disposing of air
dried sludge at three sewage treat
ment plants follow.
Vancouver, Wash., using glass-cov ered drying beds, produces a well
dried digested sludge which is ground and sold in 80 lb. sacks. The product is marketed under a trade name, and
sold for $2.50 per sack. Some bulk
sales are made and the city uses some
sludge on the parks and other mu
nicipal property. Receipts from sludge sales have been
as follows:
1953 $1,593.50 1954 920.63 1955 (7 mo.) 837.92
The cost of processing is carried as
operating overhead and is difficult to
calculate. Supervisory personnel are
of the opinion that the income pays for extra labor, sacks and other han
dling charges. Oentralia, Wash., grinds and sacks
a portion of the sludge dried on open
drying beds. Some sludge is sold in
bulk quantity and there is no charge for sludge removed directly from the
beds by those interested in hauling it
away.
Because of the relatively small quan
tity of sludge sold ($344.06 worth in
1954 and $351.00 worth in 1955), the financial return probably would not
pay for the extra labor and sacks.
City officials, however, believe the ex
cellent public relations resulting from
having sacked sludge available to the
citizens has been well worth the ex
pense.
Seattle, Wash. (Diagonal Way
Plant) disposes of its air-dried di
gested sludge to other departments of the municipality for use on public property. The sludge is removed from
the beds at no cost to the treatment
plant operating fund.
Filter Dried Sludge Raw and digested sludge both may
be dried on vacuum filters prior to
disposal. The examples cited, how
ever, filter only digested sludge. Sludge that is sold usually must be air dried or stock piled before being hauled away.
Kirkland, Wash., population 5,500, sells digested sludge on a sliding scale
of $3 to $5 per cubic yard depending on the quantity purchased. Receipts vary from $6 to $22 per ton on a
dry-weight basis. Filtering costs aver
age $6.25 per cubic yard for chemicals, labor and maintenance, but not includ
ing amortization of filter equipment. On a ton basis the cost is $24.
Enumclaw, Wash., population 2,900, sells 100 lb. sacks of air-dried, di
gested and filtered sludge for $1.50. It is estimated that income just about
pays for the cost of chemicals, ex
clusive of labor and amortization.
Tacoma, Wash., population 100,000, makes no effort to sell the filtered
sludge. Filtration costs, not including amortization, average $11.18 per ton.
Lagoon Disposal
Where cheap land is available ad
jacent to the treatment facilities the
lagooning of digested sludge is an eco nomical method. The time eventually arrives when either the sludge must be removed or new lagoons con
structed. Two municipalities report as follows on their sludge lagooning operations.
Portland, Oregon, has no sludge drying beds, consequently the digested sludge is lagooned in an area adjacent
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
326 SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES March, 1956
to the treatment plant. No serious
problems have been encountered with this method since the sludge averages 33 per cent volatile solids and 10 per cent total solids.
Sufficient area is available for sev eral more years of lagooning before
more area or another disposal method will be necessary. Sludge in the la
goon measures 2 to 3 ft. in depth at
present. Several small drying beds
permit the drying of sludge for use on the plant grounds.
Tacoma, Wash., has been lagooning digested sludge in a low area adjacent to the treatment plant to save filter
operation costs. The digested sludge averages 12 per cent solids and 40 to 50 per cent volatile matter.
Lagooning has not resulted in any se
rious problems and has saved consider
able money. Following a newspaper
story on the availability and value of
sludge, the public took a considerable
quantity of dried sludge from the la
goon.
General
In the state of Washington, disposal of liquid sludge from the digester to a single contractor has been the most
successful method from a financial
standpoint. Where this method can be done with a minimum of health hazard it certainly can be encouraged. To
date, there has not been a reported record of any health problem in the state of Washington resulting from the use of digested sludge. It is true that
liquid digested sludge is theoretically dangerous since it could contain patho genic organisms.
Practically all sewage treatment
plants serving populations of fewer than 10,000 people use open drying beds and make no serious attempt to
sell sludge. Usually the dried sludge is given away or used on municipal
property. To date, sludge disposal has
not been a serious financial problem and little effort has gone into develop
ing a market. With some promotional
activity and understanding of the
agricultural needs, undoubtedly suffi cient revenues could be obtained to
make disposal financially profitable.
Legal Implications
In connection with prescribing the limitations and procedure regarding the use of sludge, the Washington State Health Department has in the
past taken the position that the return of digested sludge to the soil should be
encouraged, provided a low degree of health hazard can be maintained in the
particular method of operation. The Rules and Regulations of the
Washington State Department of
Health, Sec. 11, Part 3, Book V, reads as follows:
"Section 11. Use of Sewage Sludge for Fertilizer. The use of sewage sludge for
fertilizing material shall be in compliance with the limitations and procedures as may be prescribed by the State Director of
Health; * and the owner shall notify the
State Director of Health of an intended use of sludge as a fertilizing material."
The Washington State Attorney General's Office on June 2, 1949, ren
dered the following opinion concerning the liability of a city arising from the use for fertilizer of sludge from a city sewage treatment plant.
"The city stands in the position of manu
facturer of the sludge. Normally, a
manufacturer is not liable to persons other
than the buyer who may be injured by his
product unless he is guilty of negligence, deceit or breach of warranty. In the case
of inherently dangerous articles such as
explosives, unwholesome foods, poisons, and possibly untreated or semi-treated sew
age, a manufacturer may be liable if he
fails to give adequate warning of the na
ture of the product. "Even assuming that the sludge is classi
fied as an inherently dangerous product,
putting the highest degree of care on the
manufacturer, it is our opinion that a city would not be liable for damages resulting from the use of sludge if each contract
* See Appendix I.
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Vol. 28, No. 3 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 327
of sale contained a sufficient warning of the possible dangerous nature of the sludge and the necessity of securing the approval of the Department of Health before using the sludge as a fertilizer. A clause similar
to the following would be appropriate: "
'The buyer understands that sludge pur
chased under this contract may be dan
gerously unfit for use as fertilizer and that the use of sludge for fertilizer is
subject to the approval of the State Di rector of Health according to Section
11, Part 3, Book V of the Rules and
Regulations of the State Board of Health. The seller makes no warranties
or representations as to the condition or
fitness for any purpose of the sludge.'
"Alternatively, non-liability may be se
cured by having all sludge inspected at the
plant and selling only approved sludge for fertilizer."
The State of Washington has a basic Fertilizer Act, Chapter 15.54 Revised Code of Washington (1953) adminis tered by the State Department of Agri culture, which requires registration and a fee of $25 for each brand name
and sets up definitions of various ferti
lizers, agricultural minerals and limes,
etc., and provides certain labeling re
quirements. The act would cover the
sale of sludge if it is processed in any
way, but if it is air dried and handled
like manure, the present policy has
been to consider it as such and as
manure, registration is not necessary.
Reference
1. " Utilization of Sewage Sludge as Ferti
lizer.'? Manual of Practice No. 2, Federation of Sewage Works Assns.,
Champaign, IU. (1946).
APPENDIX I.?GENERAL GUIDE FOR THE UTILIZATION AND
DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE. WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
It is the intent of the Washington State Department of Health in deter
mining the limitations and procedure for the utilization of sewage sludge to
encourage the beneficial use of such
sludge so that the disposal by treat
ment works will not become an un
necessary financial burden, provided, however, that a low degree of health
hazard can be obtained in the particu lar method of operation.
In evaluating and setting up spe cific limitations and procedure in any intended use of sludge, consideration
will be given to the quality of opera
tion, as reflected in the operation re
ports, design capacity and field in
spections.
Methods of Disposal
Raw Sludge
The use of raw sludge (undigested) as a fertilizing material in any form
is not permitted. Septic tank sludge would normally be considered as raw
sludge. Raw sludge may be disposed of by proper burial.
Improperly Digested Sludge
Sludge that has not been properly
digested, or a mixture of raw and di
gested sludge should be considered as
raw sludge.
Digested Sludge?General Conditions
With the exception of proper heat dried sludge, all digested sludge used as a fertilizer shall be disposed of in
such a manner that the purchaser or user has read and signed a statement that he or she understands the follow
ing, or a statement is provided with each lot of sludge which reads sub
stantially as follows:
"The buyer or user of this material understands that it is digested sewage
sludge and should not be used on root
crops, or low growing vegetables, fruits and berries, which are used for human
consumption. The seller or furnisher makes no warranties or representation
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
328 SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES March, 1956
as to the condition or fitness of the
sludge for any purpose. "Persons finding it necessary to
handle this material should immedi
ately following wash their hands care
fully with soap and hot water."
Digested Sludge?Specific Conditions
1. Liquid sludge may be discharged at the site of the sewage treatment
plant; under pressure below ground in orchards, hop fields and other crop land where there is no danger of con
taminating low growing crops or ber
ries, or leaching out on to the ground surface; or on fenced hay fields pro vided cattle are excluded for a period of 45 days. The treatment plant op erator must maintain complete records on the use of the sludge. Handling of the sludge must be done in a sani
tary manner.
2. Air-dried sludge must be dried for at least 30 days or until it can
be handled with a pitchfork. Use on root crops, or low growing vegetables or fruits is permitted if the sludge is applied and plowed under six
months prior to planting. Stock-piling the sludge several months prior to use in landscaping work is recommended.
Air-dried sludge having a moisture content of less than 10 per cent may be sacked and sold to the general pub lic provided the statement given under <( Digested Sludge?General Condi
tions" appears on the bag. 3. Vacuum filtered sludge that has
been stock-piled for 30 days subse
quent to filtering, may be considered as air-dried sludge.
4. Heat-dried sludge which has been
properly dried can be used generally, without special restrictions.
CORROSION IN SEWAGE WORKS *
By Edwin R. Stowell
Senior Sanitary Engineer, California State Division of Architecture,
Sacramento, Calif.
Negligence in the control of corro
sion frequently has been due to a lack of knowledge in understanding the corrosion factor. Specific instances
may be observed where abnormal or
excessive deterioration of plant struc tures or equipment has occurred, due
primarily to corrosion. In many cases
this has taken place without the op
erating personnel recognizing that cor
rosion was active.
It is not anticipated or expected that all sewage treatment plant operators will become corrosion experts. How
ever, it is the obligation and duty of
all operating personnel to detect and
report excessive wear or deterioration
of treatment facilities intrusted to
* Presented at 1955 Annual Meeting, Cali
fornia Sewage and Industrial Wastes Assn.;
Riverside, Calif.; April 27-30, 1955.
their care, no matter what the cause of the deterioration.
In support of the premise that the role of corrosion may be overlooked in the wear of equipment, a section of
sludge scraper chain was removed from a primary clarifier. Inspection revealed that one side of the chain had been worn or corroded to a thin knife
edge section, while the other side had retained its original cross section. This rather familiar "wear" pattern of
scraper chains is considered by many operators to be due solely to mechani cal wear. The condition, however, is
largely a result of corrosion forces, possibly in combination with erosion or mechanical wear, whereby new
metal is constantly being exposed to corrosion. The important point is not that this excessive and localized loss
This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:47:26 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions