38
Slides and Presentations Carole Goble | Uli Sattler School of Computer Science University of Manchester COMP80122 Slides are available at http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sattler/teaching/COMP80122/index.html

slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Slides and Presentations

Carole Goble | Uli SattlerSchool of Computer Science

University of Manchester

COMP80122

Slides are available at http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sattler/teaching/COMP80122/index.html

Page 2: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Three Deliverables for COMP80122

1. Active participation

2. Critiques of 10 Research Symposium Presentations– more details to follow, check easychair emails

3. A15 minute presentation plus various little exercises, tasks, …

Week 7 Seminar

Week 8 Sem & Prezies

Easter Break Research Symposium

Week 7 Disc. & Prezies

Week 8 Your Prezies

Week 8 Your Prezies

April 23-25

or alternative presentations e.g. via

videolectures.net

Page 3: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

The Three AspectsThe speaker• body language

– focus • preparedness• voice

– volume– speed– clarity

• nerves • ...

The story• story line• clarity • level• timing• use of terminology• ...

The slides• bullet lists• graphics• fonts• highlights• ...

Effects on you/audience by choices to these?What was helpful to get message across?

Page 4: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Aspect 1: The Storyline

Page 5: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Coursework for Today Make a 1. outline of your presentation

– following our skeleton above – with title slides and – core concepts/slogans per slide

2. list of your terminology – specialist terms that you need in

your presentation

3. suitable running example

‣ Roughly 1 page

Discussion:‣ Pair up with 1 neighbour‣ Discuss for ~5min:‣ storyline‣ list of terms‣ running example

‣ Then swap

‣ Is something ? missing? too long? too short

‣ Is example? big enough? small enough

• Setting the scene: – what kind of problem is addressed?– why is that interesting/relevant?

• Focus: – your Research Hypothesis/Question?

• Methodology/approach/work done: – what have you done/are you doing?

• Context:– how does this relate to other people’s

work? • Contributions made:

– what is the outcome of the work done? – what are the new insights gained? – how do these answer research

hypothesis/question? • Outlook/next steps/open questions?

Page 6: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Aspect 3: Slides for a good presentation

Yes, we’ll discuss Aspect 3 before Aspect 2

Page 7: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Slides for Good Presentations are • pretty

– by being clutter free• clear

– suitable layout & grouping mechanisms– no superfluous ink

• support the story– helpful graphics– main points & keywords

• don’t distract– no complete sentences

Page 8: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Ontology Diffing

Page 9: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

pretty - aesthetically pleasing: • helps understanding• attracts interest • raises expectations• makes audience keen to listen

Slides for Good Presentations are

Page 10: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

are clear: • serve as handrail for presenter & audience

– contain well-designed graphics to illustrate certain points• should not:

– distract from presenter– confuse

• ... we need to avoid – visual noise– background graphics– un-necessary ink

Slides for Good Presentations

???

Page 11: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Graphics

“a picture can say more than 1,000 words”:• enhances re-call

– amplified under short exposure

…but they need to be done properly:• think of the purpose, message of picture• make sure that this message becomes clear• again, use as little ink as possible

Page 12: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better
Page 13: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better
Page 14: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

!14

Page 15: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Graphics and Tables

• require a lot of thought & care for choosing– what to display – format (see last slides)– colour - use wisely!– captions, axis titles, etc

• can reader understand what is being shown?– can they read numbers: is 72348765 < 87623458? – how much eye movement & comparison is required?

Page 16: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

!16

Page 17: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Sales from Long Tail

Rhapsody

Amazon

Netflix

22%57%20%

Page 18: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Good graphics help us remember

• Use good graphics• Repeat them (shrunk) to enhance recall!

Results

• Performance of FFNNs on Task 1

Results

• Performance of RNNs on Task 1

Page 19: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Good examples for using graphics

From my friends and others:• Dave Gorman

– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1-3zMZqN78

• Matthew Horridge– http://videolectures.net/iswc08_horridge_lpjowl/

• Ian Horrocks– http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/people/ian.horrocks/Seminars/

download/KR-2010.pdf

Page 20: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

GroupingGrouping can be done by

• proximity

• color

• region

• connectors

but you should only use 1 of these methods!

Page 21: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Text and Grouping

Bullet lists:• the grouping method for text• make sure grouping

– is logical• items on same level are of the same kind• sub-items related to super item

– is not too deep– has no “lonely” items: these are rarely logical

• (again) minimize ink: avoid duplicating words• no complete sentences/telegram style:

avoid multi-line items like the plague

Page 22: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better
Page 23: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Ontology• represents

– agreement,– terminology, or– nomenclature

• contains– extensive domain knowledge and/or– known facts/assertions

• is key enabler for semantic metadata extraction from data (un- or semi- or structured)

• plays central role in enabling– resolution of semantic heterogeneity– semantic integration– semantic correlation of objects and documents

Page 24: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Which slide looks clearer?

Page 25: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Fonts

• Choose 1 font for all slides• Careful: projector’s resolution is often poor

– un-serifed (sans serif): serifs are no good on screen– readable: cornet vs comet — dark vs clark vs dork– Arial, Computer Modern Sans, Helvetica, etc.

• Large enough letters

Page 26: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Fonts and Emphasis

• Choose 1 pattern for emphasis and stick to it:– for emphasis: bold or color ...careful: might do the converse!– for new terms/quotes/names: italic– no underlining!– NO CAPITALIZING!

• .... and really stick to it

Page 27: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Animation?

• can be great to– illustrate an algorithm running– show behaviour of example– build up complex picture – ...

• otherwise it creates– useless noise– distraction from speaker

Discuss: making bullet points appearing one-by-one is great!

Page 28: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Which tool to use for your slides?

• Beamer (with Latex)• Latex other • Keynote • Powerpoint• Prezzie• HTML other• something else

My view: Each of these can be used well/badly

Discuss briefly!

Page 29: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Summary: your slides should…

• be clear & pretty – not distracting– not puzzling– not confusing – not making viewers eyes move too much

• contain illustrations to– support your points/findings– help audience understand & remember

Page 30: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Coursework for Tuesday Bring 3-5 of the slides you want to use for your presentation • Ideally some

– with graphics – with texts– you think are good

‣ We will discuss these on Tuesday

the last plenary session

Page 31: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Preview of Aspect 3: Some considerations

regarding the presenter

Page 32: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Clothing & Body Language• Wear something you’re comfortable with when

– many eyes are on you– you’re nervous, sweating

• Talk to the audience– not to the screen, wall, ceiling, lectern,…– show a friendly face, even smile

• Plan what to do with nerves – where to put hands – how/where to stand

• Use your body to make your voice heard– speak to the audience (see above)– stand tall – breath

Page 33: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Making your voice heardTalk• at the right speed

– requires practice & preparation• with breaks so that

– you can breathe– the audience can think

• in an audible way– loud/at the right volume– clear/no mumbling

• following your well thought through narrative – structured in a suitable way– with suitable transitions

• (again) to the audience!

Page 34: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Organisation Part 2

Page 35: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Deliverable 1• during the whole seminar, in particular the discussion

of fellow students’ presentations you• are present• participate actively

Make sure you’ve signed the attendance sheet

During your presentations, we will all give feedback (directly verbally & via those Feedback Notes)

Page 36: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Deliverable 2 • attend all presentations of the Research Symposium • You are assigned 10 presentations; for each

– give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and– write a critique: what was good, what could have been better – taking into account all 3 aspects of a presentation

• storyline• slides• presenter

• submit all your summaries and critiques via easychair– your reviews will be anonymous and fed back to presenters– we will discuss these on May 9th

• we’ll clarify this later

In preparation to this, we will email you • from easychair• ask you to become a PC member of UoMRS2019• follow instructions• submit your 10 critiques there

• following the Feedback Notes• these will be shared anonymously with presenters

Page 37: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Deliverable 3• you will give a 15 minute presentation

• about your research (PhD, previous, Tichy study) • to a small group of ~13 fellow participants• we discuss what

• worked well • can be improved

• Later today, we • organise you into groups• start scheduling your presentations

• First presentations: • Thursday, March 21st

You will • attend all and only your group’s presentations in

• ~4 sessions of ~2hours each• give your presentation there

You have received an email from me with • your group (C1, C2, P, U1, U2)• your presentation slot

Page 38: slides-2sattler/teaching/COMP80122/slides-2.pdf · 2019-03-14 · – give a 2-3 sentence summary of its contents and – write a critique: what was good, what could have been better

Coursework for Tuesday Bring 3-5 of the slides you want to use for your presentation • Ideally some

– with graphics – with texts– you think are good

‣ We will discuss these on Tuesday

the last plenary session