Upload
maina
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Re-estimating the Annual Energy Outlook 2000 Forecast Using Updated Assumptions about the Internet Economy. Skip Laitner, EPA and Jonathan Koomey, LBNL [email protected], 202/564-9833 [email protected], 510/486-5974, http://enduse.lbl.gov/ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Re-estimating the Annual Energy Outlook 2000 Forecast Using Updated Assumptions about the
Internet Economy
Skip Laitner, EPA and Jonathan Koomey, [email protected], 202/564-9833
[email protected], 510/486-5974, http://enduse.lbl.gov/
Talk is on the web at
http://enduse.lbl.gov/shareddata/NEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Presented at the Earth Technologies Forum
Washington DC
October 30, 2000
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Background Issue: AEO 2000 forecast may not
incorporate some important recent trends.
Question: What effect would incorporating such trends have on energy use and carbon emissions in 2010?
Tool: Use LBNL’s version of the National Energy Modeling System (LBNL-NEMS), which we’ve worked with since 1995.
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Comparison of U.S. Energy Projections:A Difference in Technology Assumptions
60
80
100
120
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Energy Use (Quads) Historical Consumption
Low-Energy Future ProjectionBased Upon 1980 DOE Analysis
EPA/LBNL Scenario
AEO 2000 Forecast
Typical ForecastsPre-1980
Source: EPA estimates and 1980 DOE Policy Analysis
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Recent Trends in U.S. Energy Intensity
10
12
14
16
18
20
1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000
Thousand Btus/$GDP
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
The Information and CommunicationTechnologies Diffusion Curve
Where the economyseems to be right now
Where most modelsseem to focus
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Methodology Method: Adjust AEO forecast to account for possible
effects of new trends and programs. Postulate changes relative to the AEO 2000 in the following areas:
— Paper and cement production (down in 2010 by 7 Mt and 6 Mt, respectively)
— Vehicle miles traveled (down about 4% in 2010)— Commercial floor area (down 10% by 2006).— Combined heat and power (up 20 GW by 2010)— Structural change (shift towards IT)— Voluntary programs more fully incorporated
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Comparison of historical cement, paper and steel production trends to the AEO 2000 scenario
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Cement-AEOPaper-AEOSteel-AEOCementPaperSteel
AEO-2000Historical
Data Sources: LBNL (historical trends), EIA (1999).
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Results for 2010 AEO 2000 Forecast = 1787 Million Metric Tons Carbon (MtC) Downward shifts from the new economy might equal 76 MtC
— Reduced Paper and Cement Consumption = 6 MtC— Reduced Transportation Consumption = 15 MtC— Reduced Commercial Building Space = 16 MtC— Increased CHP/DES/Gasification Systems = 8 MtC— Structural change in the Economy = 31 MtC
Voluntary programs may add as much as 40 MtC additional savings.
Incorporating all these effects (including take-back) might reduce carbon emissions by about 100 MtC in 2010, or about 6% below AEO 2000 levels.
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
More Questions than Answers
Would a better definition and measurement of the ICT-sectors either weaken or improve the supposed benefits?
How will competition and innovation within the ICT-sectors affect productivity gains throughout the nation’s economy? How will they impact other inflationary pressures? Will we see managed but positive deconstruction or wild and woolly creative destruction?
Are there other tradeoffs not anticipated by the transition to an information-age economy, including changes in distributional benefits, consumer or producer surpluses, the increased reliance on imported or critical materials, or other environmental and economic impacts?
Will the resources devoted to ICT-infrastructure improvements reduce the opportunities for improvement in other sectors of the economy?
Can we make this positive vision of the future come to pass?
Environmental Energy TechnologiesNEMSinternettalk001022.ppt
Conclusions Potential effects explored in this analysis are
large enough to matter.
Large uncertainties remain in analyzed effects, particularly in those related to systemic effects of E-commerce on resource use.
Other effects not included here— Reduced building construction— Outsourcing of energy services— Changes in other materials use