17
Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart, Ivan Sutherland, and Xerox PARC This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. Innovation timing

Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Skills: noneConcepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart, Ivan Sutherland, and Xerox PARC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Innovation timing

Page 2: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Where does this topic fit?

• Internet concepts– Applications– Technology– Implications

• Internet skills– Application development– Content creation– User skills

Page 3: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

A typical graphical user interface

Page 4: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Ivan Sutherland 1963 Doug Engelbart, 1968

Page 5: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

The TX-2 at MIT

Page 6: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

The Alto at Xerox PARC, 1973

Page 7: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Fail: Xerox Star, 1981

Custom hardware

Page 8: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Fail: Apple Lisa, 1983

Custom hardware

Page 9: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Success: Apple Macintosh, 1984

Custom hardware

Page 10: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Fail: VisiOn, 1983

Commodity PCs

Page 11: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Fail: Windows 1, 1985

Commodity PCs

Page 12: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Fail: Windows 2, 1987

Commodity PCs

Page 13: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Success: Windows 3, 1990

Commodity PCs

Page 14: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Not only hardware timing

Page 15: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Summary

Page 16: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Self-study questions

The Apple iPad was a successful product when introduced in 2010. Other tablet computers preceded it and did poorly. Describe one and discuss the reasons for its failure.

Apple introduced a hand held computer called the Newton in 1993, but it failed. What were the reasons for its failure?

Page 17: Skills: none Concepts: innovation timing, research prototype, commodity versus custom hardware, graphical user interface, contributions of Doug Engelbart,

Resources

Video of Ivan Sutherland demonstrating Sketchpad, narrated by Alan Kay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOZqRJzE8xg

Video of Doug Engelbart demonstrating NLS: http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html

A short overview of Xerox PARC and its influence on Apple and Microsoft:http://hightechhistory.com/2011/06/02/a-brief-early-history-of-xerox-parc-and-the-development-of-the-personal-computer/

Introduction of the Macintosh and the legendary “1984” commercial:http://vimeo.com/20676234

Wikipedia and other Internet sites have a lot of information on the products discussed in this presentation.