Sipl» AprU 1956 - pubs.usgs.gov · PDF file6 f cr 6 hears at 630 gpai _____ » Cro«3 tieotiaB frca Saval Air Station to Jerieho fiaU, shoving ... of granrsfly s&sd, clay, llnwatooa,

i*<

UNITED STATES '

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

HEMOHAJTDCM 03 70S OBOU)CI AHD GaOU:JD~«A72R i

RE3CS3CS3 07 THB PARKI3 XSUSD AREA, SOOTH CAHOLIHA

by Gaorg* AprU

Sipl» 1956

Open-File Report 57-100

NOTE: The original of this report is not. avail able. This report was copied from a carbon copy and, therefore, is the best that can be furnished.

report cubjeot to roriaion

CCS

trr^stigaticam

with salt

aad e<meliu5*CHB3

1

and scop® of investigation , _________________ 1

Location of

Geology _______________________________ ____ , ' 2

Gesaral geology aisd stratigr&phy __________________ 2

l*rlBelpal aqtdf ear la th» Parrla Islamd area _... _____ 3

Otbsr mqttlf ar» in tb« Forrls Islard juroft 7

of th» Hac^too^ »qtiif or In th* Parrla Island ar^* a __ , 9

aurfac* __________ -BW«w««^»^-«. ______ ir, m. 10

sad co«f flcdsnt of oiorsg* ^ __________ B 17

tha aquifer

Halaticci b^t^NHm pioapag* aad chlorld* eosto&tt ^ _________ 20

ftv»<m vustacr l«yel» aisd chlosrld» contact _ ______ 23.

ftotoors coneeraicg: ohlcrid* in grotmd vatar ___ 22

of nater ____________________________ 23

1» y«ll data ca tb* sapjôr and sonitoricg trail* of tha MarineCorp Roerttit Depot, Parriji IslaM, S»C. ^ ______ 10

2* CoopeaMitlTe va.t«or lofUui in velln ia Beaufort &G&during tha period* 19&U195&. _______ 15

CGETISTS - Continued

page 3* Saaaary of daily puapage* aTailabl» froa figtisti£g cud

addition*! valla is th* Parri* Island erst _____ 27

4» Cbeaieal ajxalysna of grov»d water la Boaufort Ccoatyj,S. C. _______________________________ 27

1* FlucfraatioiKi of v&tar Iwrsla dts* to tide* la vail 123,Bsaufort County* 3*C» , ___________________ 12

* Dravdovss ia ti»« Bortoa vail field prcd«c«l by pwsptrig veil 6 f cr 6 hears at 630 gpai _________________

» Cro«3 tieotiaB frca Saval Air Station to Jerieho fiaU, shoving rspcart«d static va.ter levels periods of aaximya awi sdLjilaca ptapago t ________ m 15

» CalctQ.*tioa offrosi thrsvdovna in veil 25* eawaed Igr piatpiB^ veil 26 18

5* Calculation of tran3sds2ibility &cd stors£<»froa draa*dc»wa» in wall M-4> ceased ^y poapia^ veil 26 13

&» ltaBpft^» T*KT5xyi «v«ra^« salinity ia vmlla operated by

7.

9*

10.

11.

tl»C»£»D», Farria Island, 5«.C«

rtsipag* aad ehlorl£» content of vater £rcei veil 2&, jparria Island, S*C*

Ponpag* aad chloride eontcot of vat«r frost vail 23, Fsrria Island, S.C»

Ptapagd aod chloride content of v&ter from v«ll 6, : Farria Islaixd, S.C. w . . . , 1T,

P\B3p*gs ai3i3 chlorida of vatar froi vail 22, rarria Island^ S.C.

Prepaid s»d chlorid* e&ntant of vater fr«i voIIL -27, Patria laland, S.C.

rtaapAî «od chlorid« conteiat of vater from vail ^,

20

21

21

21

21

21

21

13* Konthly puaipa^» froa veils 3 acd 21 find tha coabiaed p»f;» frca valla 21 aod 22 ccapsureri vitii chlorld® content of vatcr ia veil 3 _________________ 22

X4. y&tcr lar-sla and chlorida contarrt of vater in valla 21 ar>423 Parri3 ladsad, 3,C, jj ______ ° 22

KDCFJU23DM CK 7il£ GLOLCCIRESOURCES 0? 77>Z f'ARRIS X3USD AHEJL S.C.

by Coorgs 3U, Siple

3. Geological Survey

of

Tfeia assporejsS'-st girea ih» resoits of a abort investigation of tha

geology sM grciand-vatsr râoureî of th« Parria Island oreA; wKlcb baj

bosn sad a by tb» O^S* Gisological Sorray at th» request of this District

Public Sorks Offioor of tb» Sixth. Jlaral tistrict, Charleston, S« C.

anl th» Ccssaarsd«it of tb« nsurist Corpa Recruit D*pot at Parrlfl Island,

S» C» Th» prognsai vaa Initially raqasftt&d and aponôrod by thu Dls*»

trict ?ablle Vcrloi Dffie*, U.S* Sanry B«peartaeat» Suteftqtt«stly> this

spoAsorsMp Mas dttanôd to tli&t of tbd Harlu* Corp Eacmlt 2«pot* A

further ebsitge brought the program tmdar th« preheat epondorahlp of

Eidtrict, 0»S* Jlavy,

progr&si -ya^ limited ea*entialljr to tb* eolldctioa and iatxT-

o/ basie data and dasign&d to supply BOB* of the basic v&ier

rdcord» that vill bd nâded in a »tedy of th* problcsw or the B*«ufart

Hthoo^h tb» progrfta is acn* only partially conylttto^ thi*

baa b««a p»dpare£ in responaa to a reqB*at frees tb» Sixth

trict for m fru^:*r;r of tba conclualoaa vhlch can bo siade at this

th» basis <f tb* data collect*? to data,

of

Th® aroa ccsjccrn<>d la that Incredlatelj' gurrourdlng Parrla lolasd

arid Pert P.oyal Island and adjacent areas ia tb* southern part of

fort County together with tha eastern part of Jasptcr County, ^

**4»"*

°Carolina. It la lirdt^d generally by th» latltalsa of 3210» 5

32°-45 8 !5 and th» longitudes of £C°3G* V to £0°55' V.

Frstrioua rapcrta IncloSa a &eooracduaif *Grotmd *ater In tha Beau

fort Ar&&, S»C»* bj IwJ. Ha&darff, U.S. Geological Survey, ia 19££, an4

fc *Coa,^r»heJi3iT» plan for tbo deralopcect of a» adequtta vator irapply

for tha Marine Ccrp Recruit Papot at Parrla Island, South CarolirAt»

by Daalsl A. Eeisdall of tha Eoraaa of lard* aw! Docks, Itevy

In i%3. &a ©oîBêriBg report, »'«ator Supply EcAufort Ckmnty K

Authority, Beaufort, 5o«th Carolina*, vas preparsd by ISm easg-lneKMris^

f Ira of Barker, Seelif and Asaociatao, liic» In October of 1954*

Th» i^rrfsco fe'atJisr Brasch of th& t?»S» Geological Snanrey la cnurrently

© ..-v^-ed la a st«3y of th» Ccc3>aiM»« El'rsr as an dltern&ta vat«r erapplgr

fcr th« BaTal iiistallatlooa ia th« B*&ufcart area, and tba <,iuality of

Vatter Br»3sch 1« Kt^g*d ia salinity studl&» of tliis rl'jrer for tha

la Iznroatig&tioa of tha grotmd-water ye^Knarea* of ChAthaa Coanty,

ai, with special r»farfese» t^ tii« parcel ea of aalt«v«it«r

urrently bedjcg earri^d oat bgr tfc« U»S* Geological Sarray .la

*jlth tfc« City of Ssraiaaali aod Chatham Cotmty, through tha

of 5î5*»^ liiuiB^ and Geology of tha Oorgl* Division of

GECLCGI

Craolor

sraa li»4i IB th# soiitbern jmrt of th* Coastal Plain prorlnce

z& Iti a part of tha Soa labuod s-ecrtlon. Vlth th« subss«rg«ica of the

er«?925 durin rsccnt tiaf tb* #ea has fsncroach&d l^sadvaril ^ broad

t» stories ard foraeu zx£&rou3 Is-landa,, Tbas* lal*ndcf cat off frtsa

tba n» Inland bj tidewater flova, are chara^torlKtlcally flat but

bar* coasidsrobla r^llof dtia to tba proseaca of fosall donaa, and so-

called *3li&j% Scoa of tba latter JET® probably to* rasa3«»ts of old

a^taarios cod jcci^ cigr bar* b»«J cû»«4 ty colutlrui In the

t follovod ^y aabsoquaxzt caving of tha onrarlylc^ awfec*

a CJcastal Plain cos^slats of * flat broiuj plain underlain by

of t»ccc5iolldat*d to aesd-ecwaclldct^d

^d vlth ^ slnple hasux&ls&l strBctara crrcr as aaseleat

03 crystalUsa rocfcj* Tbesa basaocstt rotifcs «r« CCE^MUKJ of

wi, »cJiistf and dlabaslo roeV.a. At Uto ias«r awgla of

tb» Co&stal H^ln^ nâr tli* SaTassah Rlf^r^ th<jao rocks occtar at

of £.boot 100 f ovt a^xnrd aeim ea« Iffy^l* In tha f'arrla Island

they ©cciacr at depths uor» than >400 feet below icsl,

ag th« baaafiwsaxt rocia *r» tha Co&ttal Plain fora&tloraj

of granrsfly s&sd, clay, llnwatooa, aarl and cbele* In

irdi«r tb«y reprcsact deposltj of Lata Cr»tac«ous, Tertiary,

Plalstoeasa to Haccut aga» Ibay etrlka In a

direction ^^5 dip t4» th* south, soothaast at 8 to 33 f««t p«r

Aquifer la the Parrla lolend Area

principal aqialf«r la th* Pfcrria -Island area is a 'whita 1^>

, fosalLLferous, Uia«5Um« ^.ich vas prerlosaly consldcored

to b*> of ciidla to lata Eoeana &^»* Geologic data collected to data

ar* cot sufficiently ccssplata to dlatlnôlah batvaaa thin fc:nfcinti<?a auad

oth^ra of CllfroBBna, Klocena, Pli-'>een» sud Plci*»toccai9 a£;«» cna or

-V

©f vMcb vtsy ovvsrllo tha li-^stcsc In thii :~rc&«, The prir^lpal aquifer

n»r«rred. to a* ths Ccala In Georgia asd Florida, v&» prarlousljr

doer ad oquiTolest to t&e Sante»a liawtstono ta& Coopar ruirl in S

Cttrolisa* Sub&aqa««tlgr, tha upper part, cr Cooper sari, hâ "bean

dacgln^.t6d «3 Oliôc<u3o in ago, &n2 the lover cr Sactsa llaestca*

aa of aiddl« Soeana &.ê»* The £aat^9 lisas tons aai Cooper aarl crop

cut ia ?iB ^^rcuiJta bsCLty s-pproxlnataly 25 miles vido^ zxtesdizg

jLll«Eid3l3 Ccrantj of tha Srermnfth Hirar, e&stvard to ti^ iasit«»

and the !sorti.«rn part of Charleston Ccazaty* la "£&* cftttrro? crca tha

&9 1» 3c«?&r!iat soft except that veatb-*r»d exposaroa

of rocalelflad «ni iixiuratad rock^

aost paraâble p3irt cf t5i« liasstona a^pdaors to ba

part, valch 5.3 rapoirtddlj cavernous lu j>Iao*a» It ia jxwathl*

th*j eqaifar used ia tho ara* consist a of HaeatoBe of nora than

epofi bat is ref«2T«d to collectively as tb* Ocala forasatioa or

fonsatlon* It la also po»slbl* or eYaa probabla that th-« lizieol

4? an aquifer lii actmlljr younger than Eoeewi and u? to E

Its outryop KT&&, tha Saotds lisz«5toBii dip* to tfc« south-

at a vary low ax^Lo an3 in th» upp«r pacrt of Beaufort County,

It ia cor^rad fcy th» Eavthora forsatlon of -^loc^jx* age* Tba tru»

estrsctisre of tho upper unita .ias this area la not clearly tmdarstood at

the pra&ast tla«» Hie Its^stoc* (Sact«e 7) app«am to r*Ters» Its dip

ia iis* vicirdty of B<wxufort and oco«» clc^sor to th* grousd cnrfac« tibin

i:i r^wi* to tb« north and ncrtbv«at, Hcvartsr, thla alght ^ du« to the

fact that th» prlrrcip&l ll^^»tona aqrcdfer 1« cot tha r

tut rath or a younger foraatt-.n sues aa the Coopar or poasifcly cua -aar

Miocene llftastcne equivalent to th» T^pa, liaoytcao j&f Florida* Tha

discordant dip betv*ea the top of the Sentoa lines tojie la tha

area, uith that cf ths> top of th* lirsdatcce in Beaufort County

precludes tba possibility of its bein& the &aae foraaticiw If this is

£.0, tb> Ctx>js»r bna chaziêd fr a a soft saorl in th* cutcrop areat to ca

ia th« vicinity of Botittfcrt* Thar» ia also ta

flip to th» couthn^Gt frtm th» vicinitj of Beaufort beceu3«

top of tha lisdfttcst In th« SaTranrsah area occurs at an altitucl» of

at Boaufrcrt it occtâ at aa altiti&l» of apprccd-

f«it. it rrlchardvUle, 10 ailaa couthv^st csf Beaufort,,

ha* b»sn rsrp»0rt*d at an altitodo of 168 feat*.

of

drill ad fivti wrcmnd 'th« p@ria»ter of tb$ Eartoa veil fif^.d âssd o&»

about 3 nil as north of tfc« S&Tt*l Alr^ .^tatiaa^ oa the rij^t^.f~v«y of

3»C, >l5ghway 70. Tha exscalsatLoa «Bd iil«ntificatico of litboloîc

units and fauna in rapcreaftatatlv* s*aplea frcn tli^sa v*?JU§ 1» ssot yaet

eoaplat^ enough to ntfejt® posaibl* aas acctxrat« description of th« strati-

graphic coluan la the Dortborn. and cwatxtil parts of tba area, la

©otrtb-3r>si part of tha sraa, r«eorda of veils drilled on ParrJU

shew that the JtJbieatone occura at <5eptii» of froai 55 to 100 feet a:ed la

iraadiatoly OT^rlain "bgr 1 foot of hfcrd phosphate rock, r«fw:ped to ty

tba driller?? aa *c£p rock*. Overl^ria^ tbi» rock are ecctosilitiosa o?

firs .easidj bl3£ clay and âtd ajyod vitb shdlla* In gcsaaril tha

b«3tv*»»in 0 «ad 40 feat is oongldesTfitd to be rt*prosectr.tiTa of -th* F'anlico

fcrrs&tiou of Fleistoees© ti2=* # that frcra Ô«?0 foet &0 the Hawthorn

format! en cf I'UotJeeia £s &ad that ftrca 80 to 2ior& than 2-CO f»»t &a the

per fcns&tlcs of iJll^ceccs a£O»y TJisse dsôalts vMeh crerlia

3 toca tre not uniform in either thickness or ar&al extent, and the

Ll found In cne vail is not always found In edjaceot veils* It

is rousted tfcat tha Btvihcrs forsi&tlca, «. pboajSiatlo s&xdy clay, together

vith tha sllic«»att2 ph&izph&te wc«tp rock wt fcrss the oonficlr.j be5 for the

water in the liios.atone* It ia po»sibl«t

ccsiatittite tha only cocftninjg: -baci in doaê places b&£*uir»t during

and sîncs Plaiitcetaae tis«it therd has been eosxldarablo s^-ccsrt^cas

ercsicn of the Havtb^rn formaticm In thi» ganoral ftrseu At thos* ti^

tb» Icral of th® ^©c. vaa about 100 f ©tit lovor than it is ROW, ais4 the

riêra probailj cut ds«pl7 into "ta» UawUsem and oldar fonsatltaaa.

tha H&vtbcxn fcrrsatlcaa is CjtiHe thin \5i«r»TW it ia pnîciit ail in

of tha &r«a It nay not ba J3r*a*nt at all* IR a voll drillad

6 n.il»a 0outh»»3t of Boaufcrt, xsc trace of tha Havthora

tioa vaa found* Th* Cooper rârl uhich has conaiilarabltt extent la its

oitcrTp ar«fca^ either ccsostitutê tha wpp«r part of the 15js»3ton« aquifer

ia tha BêtuTcrt OMML' or #!»» is Eicoaxistant,

la the northern part of tb« ar«a, thare was a decided difference

bwtw«*n tbo eca:pa»itioa of the c»ttij^» f3ro« aonitoring veil K-4 and

tlât of ctattinga frcsi tha tvo c«« supply vella drillod at tho Baval Air

S:atlea» Tha cattlz^s from w«ll H-4> va»r« raostljr 3and vberena those froa

Air Station veils contalaacJ conaldorabla eaouata of claj

Tha top ©f the liaoBto&v aquifer is elsout 50 feet below nsea sea

1 "-/rel ia tbe Beaufort sroa* Scraa- of tha cutuaries or rivsra anch *3 tha

1'road K.iv«r asd the Beaufort ^-iver ere report«dl7' 50 feet ds&vp at lev

tide* Thsorefor*",, v.ha liaestona efe-qiilfejr is probably eotpoawl at or near

th» botto&a of these rlvatrs and In contact vith &alt vatsr.

operations aov belcg planned or uiydertak^n in connection uith tha

dovalopciant of Port Boyol as a seaport &«gr provide easiar access of

the salt vat^r Into tb« aquifer in that area. If so, -It ol^ht af f act

the chleri.*<* content of all veils la tbe> arsa* _

liiJa report la coac^rned primarily vltb th« cb&racterl3tlca of

tha Turtiarj Usastoc* a-r,ulf«sr» Bcwerer, therd Is a possibility of

utilising oa«! or acjre of tba d»ep«r Gqtsifer* la foraaticsu of

Tertiary or Lat« Cr«t&£®ou* «Lga. The two 4e«p valla on Parris41jKmetr?tt#d epyaDCSoci»at«ily 3-450 foet or B»dia«nt« asd after floir«ral testsf

th» w«ll3 wer» dftTalopaJ ^tween depths of 2600 end 2950 fest, %

tors of fcsrnjatiaEss ans icaicatdd ia a log of oua of tbd*» veils, la-

in th» appcodlx of tb« Mnadorff report. In 1939*

of tb» v&t^r botve«n 990 foet &ad 26CO

» 2* Eaparto^lj th« chloridoft «aoast«d to 8^5CO

<3epti*2 of ^70 ft. sisd 1U9 f*sti 935 ppa fre» 1850 ft. to 1$CO

435 r^-» *>ca 1350 ft. to 2500 fefrt; und S2 p?m in water* obtAin«t:l In

th* 56CO-2311 ft* interraX.

.% ,i reported ty ^\radorf f, tJi« v«ll at th» ^Bt»rpri3» Ice.Co. la

t7p&3is»d a good supply cf frtish vat«r at about 450 f*«t b

vaa a hope of obtaisiBg a mtural flow frca A greatar d*pth.

v/«ll vaa finally davelopad at 75O f&«t but the supply V&* BStSLll s&td

the vail did not flotu

oa tb-jf rortb side of COOMUI Blrer, about 6 ailed north of

to b« 2X0^3 f^»t d»»p end yi^ld fresh vatcr*

Pro3u.*sablyf th» vat-*r is obtained frca th« top of the Fe&doa formation

of lAt» Cre»tseoc*i* age. This water is typically a sodica bicarbon&ta

vat^r, is vary soft* but haa up to 3.0 pja of fl.uorl£e,

In 1943 tho Layua Atlaatlo Ccnpany drilled a 340 ft. well for the

Onolêa Fsra, near ûrtoru Tho drill $r» reported vhit« sari frca 70 to

220 f e*t and sticky white carl frca 220 to 340 fe^t. The caalr^: ia tha

veil vaa polled baeauas of tha lov yi^ld (75 gsllcrji per adnBt» vith a

25 foot druvdova) » Another vail in th* ssadôrfia areac;L*d vhlt« isarl at

a d^ptij of 60 faat aai vaa drilled to a depth o^ 2LC fe&t, 7h* static

l<rrsl vas 7 f»et b«low {protasd surfac* and tho yioli wai 270 gra witb a

20 foot drswriovn*

A vail drilled in 19CT7 for the Charleston Kinlng &nd Mfg. Co»^ .

7 sdlos north»A0t of Bearer t on Chioolwi lalaJsd, vent to a depth of

710 fe»t» 21j# ^ppmrsotst part of the ii^sstona aqnifer, frc^s 57 f t* to

70 ft,, coataixidd âlt water* After tho veil vaa deraloped at a depth

of £51 feat, watar flowed orsr the top of th« casing at a rate of 10

* Ths» j5rlll«asr repcrt-ftd that tbs veil voald yi«14 100 gpa vith a

, the vat4>r wsji not r,alty. 7h» aquifer was probably

A vail VSA drilled in 1905 for the ?«rm ?k>rsal jfcdua trial

aral School at Trogaora, by the Hia^ha* Specialty Coll Crillicg

of Charleston. Orislcatlly tîs veil vaa drilled to 960 feat.

I "5 1943 ftr 9 JJU Ccnrjolly, veil driller, roportsd that at aac*

t !-.> « whil« ha v«-3 vortinj on th* veil, salt vator vas ©ncnu-n t>?r«d and

th& v»U a"b-i7v1or*d; &lso tî&t a ^satisfactory v*te«r supply vaa

froai a êpth oT ---.bout 2C-C f«»t.

In tû* apriu^ of 1954 two teat valla vera drilled in ccnnecticn

vith the i;rouzid--<watar imroatig&tion at Savannah, Ca.* Cne Vis drilled

os Cockstpur Island, abotrt 12 miles oast of Savannah and the other on

Ell ton Head Island about 22 alls* east nortim&at of £ava&neh* Both

valla ver3 drilled to apprcxSa&tsljr the sesae depth, 750 f«*t. 7hay

pane -rated the llnwujtojid aquifer at a depth of about 725 feat and vest

seise 20 fast Into orêrlying elaj» In the veil oa Cockapor Xslarsd, the

Mor5.r3ai content vaa less than 40 ppa ia voter saaploa t&kan

th» entira d»pth of .the w«ll» On the oth«r baud, the v&tor ia the

Rntoa n**d I al&nd v-sll eboved an increase in chloride vith dapth,

the hot toe fisspl* reportedly contiiined oir«r 500 ppa of chlorida*

Tram the data available, It appears llkeXjr that vater 21^7 b«

taia*d froat so^» of the deeper foraw-tioss, bat there is doubt eji to

vh$th*T It vill be fnsah eaocght f or" clrijalciri^ ptorpoaea* The

tisss of d&veloidnfi: a aopply of vat4ar of eatlafrieUxry quality frcaa one

of tb© dsaptir aquifer* sxe ssore f&TJtsrable at places dlatsoit froa1 salt

v&tar

HIDSCI/CT cr TH1

Ihe probli» in the Parr is Island area revolves aroucd th*

1 7 us to the sacftmt ©f wmtar that say be vitbdarswa ftron the liaeatcn»

Bqulf'^r vithout c&âaiiig »alt-va.t«r cncroacbaant*

It cujt be essrphjaaiisd that an adequate appraisal of this prohlsw

reqtii.r:?3 con^Sv2^rablj saora tiae aM data than that in-?l«ded Sjn the pre*-

sent st-aey ttjj-3 that a»y appral&al of the situation at this Use nd>ceaaa

f^-itryolT^» a X&rg$ risk of 3adsint«rpr^tatica of data* An additional

explication arii»^3 fircw the fact that oocaft of the reported data rsay be

toInaccurate or

Cf primary consideration in on appraisal of tho capacity of an

arruifcc ia tho position of th» vnt^r-taljl* or pisstcsslric surfa-co.,

This 13 c&taised by c artful sâaureaest of vatcr levels in vell&«, A

corollary factor, la this c&ao, la the cbauga is ehlcrida eactwit of

tha water vith a chsr.ga la vatcr laral das to pusplng*

The history a»2 dsacription of th» ?&rrl9 Island ua.t sr-~supplj,

ccra prised of Jericho, Burtcn and Hitval Air Station voll fields, is

tain&d ia tha reports &onlion»d above* By th» end of 1955 th« .'a

charr|f^ in statas of this STip^ly involT»4 tha transfer of tho Saâl Air

Station veil field faells 11, 12, and 13) to tha Xir Station /da

Tbos, th« fiarin^ Cor|> Recruit Depot fca» at th« pre9<mt

cnlj th» Bartoa veil field for practical or everyday 1^0. The Jericho\

veil fiald baa bssa puapod tat a f sw fcûra a ssonth dtirisg the past tvo

yea.r»« T^bl» 1 liats the pros salt supply valla scd th» ssonltorin

tba sr«a. Kacb supply veil la BaUxad and currently

D*sp5.rtaejst at the Marina Corp 30eruit Ifepot re^cacrrda

«^« threat eaeh vail ecd *aak^» aonthl^ ssaasurstt&nt-s of

aad pcstpdug i#ater lir/^la in th» supply vails* Inalysea of th<i

sn.lt conttfttt of ia»ch *«>11 ia also reported. Vatvr l«r?el» ar» »aa»«rod

vith a pratSHinr* g^grs attached to th^ alr-liaa. Iiiaascach aa one pou&d

por s-7CAri9 isch of prasaura ia tha eqru-yalent &f 2*31 f^st of water,

tr.03 vetutr levsl» »î$arad vith an siir gage reading to th« ne-arsat ^

pcurd ere c*ccxarit3 to vithin only OBe-half foot* Bcc&U3» cf th» pcsmiLi-

Involved of icac-ûrat* ®atisnt*» of thd cb*r^:» ia vator Icnrala vith

Fnrr

is

I si

cnd

?6 27 23 ^ 1- -

r* 7

M-l

M-2

M-"

5

M-4

M-;

M-f

M-7

JU1

X-?

dorf

f-

Co,

' ">

!/

No.

','

0,

V-'.

-p,T

,,«

.,.

n

FF

T-1

14

litji

11

C

i "i

c

"TO

116

125.

11

_

117

12*3

. 34

_

131

* .P

-O^-

P

132 ^.M

22.3

2.

118

13^/

7^

119

12

5.7

0

120

117^

26

121

12

8.0

0

122

110^

93

23

1$

123

135.

81

133

o.ri

-.5

125

1-2

.57

," r*

>

100

or

07 nc / /

-110

102

ICO 9? 105 75 115

110-

-ic .'

- *

1*7

*

1C n 12 12 12 1C 10 10 10 10 10 12 1?

O °

~ ^T

T^.h

/-T

^rK

f*?

d r*

ptV

. P

erio

d

of

i^r

tc

to

vat«

?r

he-

w

ater

der

th

P?

,3.0

,

/,7

)

/t/f.

r.1

/56

7*

27.3

f-

2,0

)

7B

24.1

(-~-n

5y

«76

24

. 7 (

>/

"

12.4

2^ 11/4

/55

13.2

5 '-/

: "

-")

10/2

7/55

PI

22,6

^'

r.'r.)

r

\ r /

i o-

7°

fo

]6

A-/

'/7/

">/]

7/c

;5 : L

- iJ

r L J LS

. ..,

* '/.^

./

/ /-

-//

/ )^

/]9/

55-

85

*1

13

' *

' '

'/ 1

/28/

563/2

4-

5°

65

5.6

8H

^-

l /;

4

/15

/55

06

%

,?.5

|<+

nY

/;

^P

^0

l^?n

-'

/. /z

)l/-

/56

i 4

/26

-97

12

.35'

' ;

V /

:' '/!

V

^/5

5

'

140

Ave

rs g

e ^

^,1

rks

chlo

rine

p«r

j '-id

2/

22

VIM

s

nir

ll

rn -

da tu

n 4

2.C

-,

0*3

n

IQ

n

20

nN

ew

pupp

ly v

^ll

jf

\ at

NAS

Yi^

ld=

300

prt^

. hQ

3 ie

da

tum

?'r«v

su

pp

ly w

ell

,^2

9t

KA

S T

ield

=300 g

m.

?lp

is

dat

un

Mo

nit

ori

ng

w

ell

,M

on

ito

rin

g w

ell

, chlo

ride is

i

70

ape

of

2 an

aly

res-

1/1

2

& 2/9

j

23

w

23

"M

onit

ori

ng w

ell

, ch

lori

de

is

]

Monit

ori

ng w

ell

. C

hlo

rid

e is

j

22

z%$

3/o

^5^?

ai?

efS

"= 4

Co

-/Krr

a.J

Monit

or

In?

wo"

*!

- Y

ield

-

18C

rit

L

obec

o.E

xp

erim

enta

l w

ell

on

ImS-

Ch^

.';"1

26

is

aver

age

of

2 analy

ses,

2/^

7*

^

7 tt

< i

r

datu

rc

used

by

MCR

D at

Perr

is

Isla

nd,

assu

med

to

b°

1

03

.5 ft

. b

elo

v r

cean

?e

a le

vel.

M

P=

mea

suri

ng

poin

t ?"

Ta

= gal

lons

. bp

low

m

ean

low

w

ater

, or

as

used

in

pre

vio

us

report

s,

rocpoct to tins and punp^ga, the Sunray reCOEsendad certain changes in

tha obtiitasent and recording of iroch data, ?b*se changes v«r» coccamod

chiefly with th» sis® of A constant recovery tine (4. hours) baforo the

stalls or puapiag v&t«r leva! vas aeitanxrad In ft veil vhich had baen

previously ror-ning or abut down respsctivoly^

7i5» principal liicsctono aquifer ccntairm vator under urtesioa COD-

dltiooa. Thor-s iâj b* 3cn« cxcaptlc-ji* to thlaf but It appllod to tb*

grantor part ©f th» ar&SL*, Vster-larrels In artaslajo veils fluctncta du»

to a swab^r of faetc«ra» Itssa factcrrs 5Lncl«d» naoivty puapln?f

trie charges, tld«a^ an-', otbor loading phecoewyu In order to

thd rifetiaro &cd fUBomt of th&»« w&tar lonsl chax5g«wt ftutogsatlc recordirig

gages vairn ixistall^d cm ftsrrcral supply vails and sc«iltorlng vdlls la

th« J«frlcbo» Bortcrn aad Saral Air Statioa ar«as» A continuous recorder

%»âa iKstalldc! CB Jarlcbo vftll Ko» 4 fcxr approxlc&tÎy 60 days during th0

first half of 1955* Tbo record sboved ti^t thd vater l$vel In thio veil

vaa affected by cxx^minie tlSes «ad that ttra 0esal«dltirnal cfcang» cans ad

ty this factor alon«» âount^d to Atf »«ch as 1.6 ft. Gradual ds&ngc*

o*/*,3? a per* od of aVout 28 5«y» cci3cld0d vlth varying pJiA5»s of tb« aocn

and chaug*® ia baroaetrle pressure* The b^roacBtrlc djan^«s are r«cordad

ty a iss.i-cro'barosTJiph located vlthla thm> vall-house cr recordocr aha3.ter*

T^*"O ^.'*5Yly r»eord«rrs bare been Installed in tiirn on vellj H»2 asd *^-3

in the Barters vail fialdj oa v^Hs *^5 aad Io» 25 in the riclnity of

frsrtc'e; ca valla 5-1 and 3W2 at the Ksrral Air Station and cm well }*-6t

»ox: 4Jywt!r!>t of the I'urtcn wall fisld and n*ar Broad I2iT^r» A. continucua

rocord ^r has t^s In op9r&ticm on veil }4~4. at the Saral Air Station 3ioc»

A^ril 1955* The reecr3s obtalBdd frcai these walla indlc&tod a tidal

effect on vater lavala for all vella except !5-£. Tidal

Tim

ft.,

bv

davs

O) -a c re O

'(U (U > (U s- O

)

fO

E-l

-55

JI2

-2-5

512

-3-5

5I2

-4V

55S

2-0-

5

I i

could cot ^s» discerned vith certainty ID tha' record for veil M~£,

to ths fast that thoy vera screened out ty cua^rouaOr bttzeUs Hit ktlf r</kc4<S {or^'i-Jrtts ccKtk'^pfj

du» to prapisg* 1st ot-hsr vsilsf boveyer, th« 3 sal-diurnal charts in

v&tar loral dsia to tidax rargfrd frca .05 foot In veil X~l to 2»6

In vail J£-&(?l£. !) Ib» not c!mr.g* in v»tar lenrel during tb» period

Octo^r i to- Sorêrr 2S, 1955, dao to tha tide, «aoatitod to 4U.5 feet

In vsll 1^-6* Tho tidal-respor^* ratlojthe ratio of th« ch&rtg* la vater

lov»l -a a veil to th» r^tig* in 112*} rasged'frca 0»C066 to O.K7 In UHI

Vislls o"bânnjd» Th* flactustlons (of about »C5 foot) thought to ba jdun

to tidal affect la vail* 1 1, 1-2, &cd £0. 25 ar» so aronll ajid oocur

at craco tia^s aa to Irdleatte th» poaalbllltj that they aaj fc« due ia

part to cbartgti In lâreoatric pra«»uro»

ng of usar-lgr vîllj la t&a gr&atast factor effectlt!^ the vatear

irs othur valla in the area. Ih» isacant tj vhleh pyapinu one vail

vlll effect vator letrals la other valla depauds opoa ths rat ft and durs~

of puaptfcg, th» diatanca botv^beB wells, the p«?T3eabiUlty of the

i'ir, aid thft en tragic* losd«a in tb» ob»«rr9d veil*

In order to obtain data en the drawjovm esas«d ^gr piaapir^t n jnsxp-

tost vas ssid» en voll 26 daring <?uly 21 «nd 22, 1955* Th* test con

sisted of zca&3;sricg th» jracoTftry of vater lereOLa In ^dia *V5» -^-2, H-*4 t

i^ 25 c.f t«r shutting dcvn veil 26, which bad b0en po?ped for 9

B hcvrs arka 4r5 sdiratfss, at & r&te of 225 gpa» J}«pth» to v.«.tesr ver*

fceasur«; I;i veils ?^-2, *^5* a^ 26 vith & w^ttet tap^j vellj *'«4, 1-1

and 25 visra equip.- »! vith aatoc&tle recor<ling gages* Tbe te^t Indica-

t: ,] ll-.at rô dotectablo drawdown ocûrrad in veils K»2 «sr ii- 5# thoj being

too f&r avaj to hav» a n«*3nra^le dr&vdovn vlthin th» tiae of tb^ toat»

Tii a cravdovu tVurlug tha fir^t 5^-hr-nr period was 4»2 feet in vail «U4f

0,95 foot in wall 25, Kid 0.39 foot in vcsll X-l. Uell >U4. Jb approzl-

natuly 2000 feat «-aat of vail Ko» 26 ard veil 25 about 3950 foat j&crutb-

vast of vesll 26. Tha xanraliAbility of infonaatloa on the distances bo-

af fectj the interpretation of tha rasulta of tbia test,

taken froa ths evaJlable naps, ere not sufficiently ac

for tha computations iirrolved. Tteus, veils reprt?s«2jt«d a» closer to

tho ftr3p*«3 valla hara leaser dravdovns tbaa tl^J3& farther cvay

is poaalbla but tiEllksly.

vhen w*dl 2o 1» ps?r»ped nt the tiaual rat* of 25C-3CX) gpa^ it reqtalres

approxls&tely 65 bo«:r» for the vatsr lirrel to stahilisft in veil K-4? and

12 hours to stabili** in âll 25* "This fcppa&ra to izidicat* that either

(l) the peraealdllty of tha &qiiif«r decrtsaaos conaidarallj' in tba <5irso«

tics tc^Krds Ui» ^srsl Air Station (end vsll !-%4) or (2) tbo eatranus

$ in vsll H-4 «cr« ecaaidsrably larger thaa in otksr veils or (3)

rakncva jgîologlc eha^ga occurs b«rtveea the £aval Air Station, and

vail 25* i>--i« ia »t»* iiidieatlon that th« parjaeihilitj of tha aquifer

i« ^roAtcr^ in tha -ârton i*ftll field thâ in the tarem c»«r the Haryol Air

jQj1 recordar was In oper&tictt in acnitoorin^ vell^ K~3> in

Ihrrtoo vail flald chcriag th» period Fehraary 10 through Jtarch 17^ 1955*

K~3 la located 1^075 f»st frca wall 6^ *^liich ia passed At « greater rate

(4.CO-450 upn) tha« orgr other vail in the field* The period of record

la too abort to &ake êrgc êfiaita conelialona, but vhdn tba tot^l pasap-

is? ratea v»re 500 gpa or lass tfc«n*e vaa no apparent affoet on vîter

1'j'r-la in vfdl JW. A total pue)p&0e Of 1000 to 1700 gpa apparently ca

a 2 foot drop in vater lural in veil T 3 v<hdre«.» a total pu£pa£i3i of

gpâ on FeVruary 21 c»n3«?d a 6 foot drop in vail K-3» Additional records

cf uater larval* ia this veil vculd be of dcfirdte

puaplng testa war* &n.de In th* Burton wall field daring tha

January 2£>-27, 1956. For th» first teat vsll 23 va* puaped at

A rat» of 300 gpa a*^ valla 24., 27 > S, and **~3 vere uaed aa obs<*rvatica

volla* Contisftted puaping for B hturs failed to reveal any dotoetaULo

drjivdovn la tbn observation vails. For tha aoeofcd test veil 6 vas

puapad at a ra,t® of 680 gp» &r4 vslla 27, 3, and M-3 w«r» us«J CLS ob*

serrtitiotk v*U3» Th* diataccoj: betvean the«» vailfl ara not accur&telj

represented oa iwdUtin£ zaapa but th» vrlter rAds a ccspaaa and tape

trarora* aad obtAinaî 1,C75 ft, for the dists^c* betvfrtan vails 6 and

K-3; and 1^270 ft. for th* distance b«tvoe» valla 6 and 3. 71a» did

not parait % similar tr^Twroo to veil 27 frca *£~6* batjj Ja^gij^ fi"ox

tfc« amount of dra^dcum in vail #7, It is ejtiaatad to bo b«t«e«c 700 &u

$£0 £t. fsrcsa vail :-5-6* Tha vat^xwlerala ia veil 8-3 ver» naaaured vltii/^^^ ^x

a oteal tapa; thoa« ia vellJi 6, 3, end 27 vltfe fin'&ir gftge*) £fter^ >^. ^^^

6 hour3 eczttizôua pusplng tb« v&ter levels in all vall» had e

stahillrad* She draudova la veil 8 isscuat^ to 3»0 foet; that la veli

H^3/ 3-^2 f®^tj £25d t-hat in well 27 aaouctfcd to A.O feet. Althouî tb*

dwrat!on of th* teat eoiscid«d roughly vith th® rscadic^ tld«f the srITect

cT tb^ ti--o probably uas s»t significant b«caus« the t^dal aff^rt ia vsU

K-*3 P as daienrsinfd viOa tba r^Cd-îng: gaga^ fisount««S to 1 ess iltan

foot* Figure 2 shova the g-sneo-al relationship of the vater l^Tal

fors ssd near th® and of th» ttyst ia tb* -ûrton vtdl fi^ld on January

2S-Z7.

There vs^ rsot sufficient tism cor data aradlable for ccm;«trtictioa

csf a. pieaouj*tris zc3p, but a Casparioon of th'* data used for such a

r:;up 5ja af '"or^ssl in Tablo 2, which lists tha recant vater levels in

lfic v-pllj ccrspstrjfcl viUi vater levelJ Esa**-jur;d at proriona tildes.

M-2

4

29

Wes

t

T

W«t

cr

l^vel

bofo

r

Wat

er le

vel

nv

ar

end

of

f-um

pinc

V

.st

tost

27

Ho

rjio

nta

\ 1

Inch

=

4CX>

fe

et

Vert

ical

as

Ind

icat

ed

Figure 2

. Dr

awdo

wns

in th

e Bu

rton

wel

l fi

eld

prod

uced

by

pumping

well

6

for

6 hours

at 6

80 g

prn

Tab

l* 2."

C

crr.

para

tlye

wat

er le

vel

s in

wel

ls

in

Bea

ufo

rt

and

Jasp

erC

ouni

ies

duri

ng t

he

peri

, od

1941

-195

6.

WELL N

UMBE

RParri" Is

land

Mundorff

N-jTi!.er

Number

i ME

ASUR

ING

Desc

ript

ion

POINT

Alti

tude

*WA

TER

LEVEL

Dept

h Al

titu

de

(feet)

(foo

t)Date

REMARKS.

i n 4 6 K

11

R 12 n 13 n

USG

S C

o.

No.

BF

T-2

8 n ^

19 N 21 n 22 IT 25 N 26 n 27 n 28 n TO

ho

le

in

PUTD

P ba

no

air

-lin

e

pipe

ho

le

in

pum

p ba

se%

£&£?

M**~

ho

le

in

pum

p ba

so

air

-lin

e

top

of

pum

p fo

undat

ion

air

-lin

e

top

of

pum

p fo

undat

ion

air

-lin

e

top

of

pum

p fo

undat

ion

air

-lin

e

floor

of

pum

p ho

use

pit

top

of

casi

ng

£"^1

9 .In

on

.jj1r

.c7

>N

26.6

3.

*29,

2.

21.5

*

21!:?

^!

I-'-

/'

11.6

2\\r

t-.13

.0

25.5

27.5

13.5

(?

)

37.0

35.0

(?

)

11-5

25

,5,

7.0

5'

22.3

1

23.8

20.2

3

22.3

11.2

3

16.2

14.1

3

15.1

5.60

24.0

8.15

29.4

24.0

10.8

5

,8.1

9

4-4,

32

U.4

4-1.

25

4l',

9

4-0.

39

-3.2

4-11

.37

412.

4

47.9

0

413.

0

426.

85

44.1

tit?

43 1

2

4/1

5/4

4A

vera

ge

/fyd

/tety

t^ft

S-

<?S

'-6/

1/5

5-1

/56

4/15

/44-

' '

¥ ^

Ave

rage

4/5

5-1

/56

4/1

4/4

4A

vera

ge

"7^/

> //

^t^

.^ £

<(*

<.£

//

1/5

5-1

/56

v t>

v V

4/S

/UA

vera

ge

1/5

3-2

/54

Lar

ge dif

fere

nce

ij

A/8

/44

' alt

itu

de

of

B««

*ar«

Ave

rage

in

g

po

int

ind

ioat

ei

1/5

3-2

/54

ob

viou

s err

or.

4/7

/44

Ave

rage

W

ell

deep

ened

si

nci

T /c

o

o /c

/ i q

y /

i/j/

rt' £/

2**-

«* ?*

+**

4/1

0/4

1

4/1

7/4

4

-

Tov

n of

Ftj

nu

fort

Tab

le 2

.- C

onti

nued

WEL

LU

SGS

No.

29 34W n

46 n n 53 n

EFT

- 56 n it n

JAS-

25 n n

JAS

-26 n n

NU

MBE

RM

undo

rff

Num

ber

29 46 n n 53 n 56 n n n 76 n n 73 « n

MEA

SUR

ING

PO

INT

Des

crip

tion

Alt

itude*

(f

e.it

)"

' ,

9.0±

ft

. to

p o

f ca

sing

balo

v do

or sil

l

top

of

casi

ng

top o

f ca

sing

top o

f ca

sing

N n

N

n n

N

base

of

pu

mp

val

ve

top o

f ca

sing

red

uce

r at

top

o*

casi

ng

n n

. n

n N

if

* n

«

top o

f ca

sing

if n

it

3"

thre

ad

pro

tect

or

top

of

vood

pla

tfo

rm

ft K

*

top

of

thre

ad

pro

tect

or

23

,9

n

20. A

n n

U.2

6

42.0

4

13.2

2

n n «

37.2

n

3B.2

5

23.3

5

VI

24.0

5

WAT

ERD

epth

(f

eet)

8.1

6

9.5

4

10.4

18.0

5 .

18.1

5

19,0

6

20.8

7

22.2

5

5,0

5

5.31

6.7

8

8.63

20*0

19.8

22,6

0

12.0

-6

12.7

7

. 16

.98

LEV

ELA

l ti-

tude

(feet)

44.0

4

41 A

, 36

413.

5

42.3

5

42.2

5

fU3

4

423.

39

419.

75

48,1

7

4-7.

91

46. 4

4

44.5

9

417.

2

417.

4

415.

60

411.

79

411.

08

47.0

7

REM

ARK

SD

ate

1:43

P

Mî

S

topp

ed

pum

p 24

7/2

n/55

^-

m

inut

es

pre

vio

us:

7.

3/2

0/4

1

4/2

6/5

512

x00

Noo

n 4

/10

/41

2:40

KM

4/1

1/4

410

:32

m

f V

^s

7/2

1/5

5

-^ -°

"12

:00

NOOD

4

/12

/44

5:05

FM

M

aj b

e d

iffe

ren

t 7/1

1/5

5

veil

.

3/20

/41- >

4/12

/44

4/3

0/4

4

4/2

0/5

5

4/21

/4-4

1C/3

C/4

7

4/1

9/5

5

3/1

3/4

1

10/3

0/47

4/1

9/5

5

.

Tab

le 2

,- C

onti

nued

WEL

L NI

TMBE

H ,

,,,...

M

EASU

RIN

G .

POIN

T

WAT

ERus

esN

umbe

r

JAS-

32 n n

HA

M-6 n n

Mun

dorf

f D

escr

ipti

on

' N

umbe

r

79

top

of

3"

tee

M n

n n

n

n n

n n

w

n w

n if

*

8C

top

of

casi

ng

rt ft

w w

« n

n n

Alt

itu

de*

D

epth

(f

eet)

(f

eet)

9.2

|3

,6

n 43

.66

" 43

.3

" 4

3.1

22.8

41

1.2

11 41

2.2

" 49.8

LEV

ELA

ltit

ude

(feet)

412.

8

412.

86

412.

5

412.

3

434.

0

435.

0

432,

6

REM

ARK

SD

ate

3/2

0/4

1

4/8

/41

10/2

9/47

4/2

0/5

5

4/8

/41

10/2

9/47

7/9

/55

15"

It nay be seen that vhereas acae veils, particularly in tha vestern or

southwestern part of tha area, {towards Savannah), appear to h&va lover

vater levels in 1955 t.hiin in 19££ or 1941* the decline In vator level

eacuttt* to lass than 3 feet.. This fcay represent a drop In vater level

caused by increased puapage in ths Savannah aroa. Bouever, those veil*

vhlch shcv tha greatest drop in i-ater level era close to tide vater and

therefore effected "by the tide. The drop In vat«r level in these valla

is l«as than the fluctuations of water levels in response to tide, as

cotod in oth-r veils similarly located* In tha Burton and Beaufort

tha Apparent drop in vs,ter level has baen of tha sasie

r, bat vben it is rrrnrabered that the effects of

in altitod» of »&asscri:r: point, end discrepancies of v&ter level

say individually or collectively produca en error as rreat

IT not greater than tha apparent I^rop in vatar level, then it is enri-

dent that etdditiooal, &ore aeciir "-a inforaaticrn nost be obtained in order

to detersLine vhether a progress! 3 loveing of vater levela is taking

place.

ffcerttas tha pi»«>Btetrie stap '^reduced by Knndorff indicated the low

est vatar lev*l in the Burton vs .1 field to.be »t an altltode of 1.85

feat, present data ahov that the lowest average v&ter level during 1955

vas 3-5 feat. Thus IB tha eoiu> -.reduced Ijy ptacpage in tha Bnrtcn ^^1

field, there is an apparent drop .^f vater levala In the ordar of 2.0 feat.

Figant 3 shovs a cross &ec^~. ;?n of veils frca the northwest to the

froa the K^' \1 Air Station to the entrance of tha

Corp H»cnzit repot at Far- la Islcnd. The curves sbov th« reported

vater l«vsls In veils at the tlr.- of hi^h puaâge (Aizg. 1954), a>t a tiaa

of interr*»diata prapaga (July 19; 5), sad »t a lisa of lev puap*ge (Dec. ,

aaonn*v£sd to 'r ^J^9 56.3, rtiid 30-2 rdHlicn gallons per

, respectively. The avera£a difference in vator larval betveen

that reported during the greatest pua;x&se asd that for the least

is appTffrlreatsly 10 foot ID the Barton veil field and leas in

areas* The vater levels in these veils appear to bd a

reflacticn of tho surface topography, vhich night lead to the conclo-

eica thst thay represent vater- table conditions » Uovarer, the coaflgt>»

ration of tho v&ter levels ia also due to the fact thct puapaga in the

Jericho and Ha-ral Air Staticn veil fields is cocaidarablj lover t.hjrn

that In Burton, and colncldently the 54 two &re&3 ore higher, topogra

than the Burton veil fi«ld

Ths distance to the recharge area of the lioaeUme equifar has

tofora boen cccaldarcd to be approrloataXy 30-^0 adlss in a earth v*et

Bcv«T£sr, there is sose basis for Asyualng that local recharge

place either ty leakage throuî the ccnTining bed 07 through places

vhcre the confining bed Is abeent. Ibe vater lorels.at the Eanral Air

Station aud those sentionad tj Mundcrff in the Lobcco area, are ET2i>-

stastiaGLlj higher than those in the area around Burton, Beaufort, cor the

lovar part of I"ort Hcfyal Isl&nd* These higher water lerels night be

accounted for hy other factors bnt thqy night also roprasgpt arâs of

local rg>chArga, offgcteA through the vatap»table» In addition, it vas '

noted that vh*r»*s the use of pitcher prtjî In the vaUgrwl^Lble aquifer

en Pert Hojal lalasd has beotn vld»apr»cd in

? used at the pre»»a3t tine becaiise of & Xoverad vater_lcnral^ Again this)

naj be accoontad for by the depletion of the vater table aquifer

of prolocgid dry periods, but it oould al^»o Indicate that the relief of

pressure en the confining bed, chja^to puaplug the Burton vail field, has

loa]ot^» throuî the confining bed asd lose of vater frcn th»

-17-

table aquifer.

TrgL033las!'bility K.

testa vere ghdft by Jtadorff in 194A and subsequently

during Uiia irrreatigaticn for tiie purpose of determining the fundamental

aquifer cons tin t* of tr/tntnl aaibility and coefficiaot of storage Hun i

dorff'a lesta in the Burton veil field indicated the ararage

bility of tbe aquifer in that area to b* about 90>000 galloca par day

per foot* Tests at tb* Saval Air Station irdicatdd that th0 tran

bility tbere va» only 45*000 gallons per day par fool. ?h» tra.nsal»»ibt-

lity repr«*»Bts tb» rtalxacr of gallons $6 v&ter per day which vill perco

late thrcru^b eaeb aeeticn of the ftquif atr one foot vide* and haying a unit« _

bydranlic gradient.

The traisnlesibilities obtained a» a result of recant puapingv

vare calcolated by use of the Thais tton-equilihriiaQi netbod, vbar&in

T s 1U^ C Vfo)

S st tiTt1.37 r*

T ~ trancnlaaibtlity in gallons per day per footS ~ coefficient of storage, a disansionloa* fractionQ s pusrplng' rat* in gallon* per oinater = distance b«twe«a pusped veil end obserration veil,

ix» feet t 5? tise since pocsping began (or B topped), in

u s 1,C7 r2?n

V (u) a -C.5772 - log \i 4- n - n2 4> tP _ ^ n^3*31 -l»4

Tbo taata coodocted in 1955 r-Txl 1956 indicate valnaa for

in the Burton vsll fi^ld cttrreapc?c<aing closely to those obtained

2/ rhoia, C.7. Thd Helatitaa Betvwm tbe Loverins of tbe Piexccietric Surfacetha Bat» and Deration of Discharge of a Voll Using GrooDd Vatcr Stc?r.\£e»

ji». Ceopoyj. Union, 16 r519 (1935)

ia 1944* I>o recsat t«3t ha.3 boon cocdoctcd at ths JJaval Air Station -

Tjaa of th« constructional activities currently Irx pro-

in that ariwu But a test en v«U 26 Just couth of th* Karal £ir

Statists, obtaisasc! iiidecialv* results » Tfc* trAassaiaaibility calculated

frm v<i tar leyala ia wall 25, (flgw» 4-} in th* dlr action of Durtan

V011 field, vaa appixsdbatoly SO^CXO gallons per day tut the transaisai-

fcj-lity as calculated f?oa tb« vatar 10val3 in 8-4, on th« »outhera

of th* âval Hr Ctaticn, ascu&tod to only 25*000 gaJlora per d^y

of th« coefficient of ctoraâ iodic*ted a tralu»

1 x 10"^ for tesla in the ^jrtca vail fi*ia cssd 3.5 x 10*5 for tfeo3« naar

ths !?aT*l Air Statlczu Tha coftfficicat of etcraga is dafiocd by th» 0.3.

fjical Sur?cy a» folloro* Th» coafficiwot of storage of sa acj^sif jr

tbo trolir** of vatâr it r«l«^s*3 from car taiea Into otora.g» per tsrdt

ace ar*a of th* aquif aar per unit cb&x&a in tba ccsponant of bead

aortal to tha 2narfac*» Altbcu^ »>t inelodod in hi 3 report, Jl

calculations of tba #t«rag* coefficient ia th* Burton area, as ob

f rca hia Eoto», &^ra»d sabs tantl ally vith thoaa calculatM froa

recant

3:« cxûlfar caed in th* Forri* Island ar*a IB orcrlAin ia contig

uous araas bj salty jnjrfacfc later and bj mataricls saturated vith salt

vat&r. Salt water cr brackish vatar also occurs in aejuifors tmderlylJBg

the fV-esb-vatflr aqulfar. Tbns, eoctaaiittatica caa result frca (1) covr>-

vsrd s*Mj»ijt> of 0^1 ty or brackish vat«r frca curf&oa eourcea tor cnrsr

^ b«d» (2) lateral rsigration throo^b the llasstona (3) wpw-ard EKTM*-

of trrd^rljl^r sal^r vatsrs, «3i3 (4) IcaJcaâ throa^rh dofacULva veils*

'?.

r*-

i.o

s (drawdown in feet) 5

IQjO

r^

Figure $.-

Calc

ulat

ions

or

tr

ansr

aisf

libi

lity

and storage

coef

fici

ent

from d

rawd

owns

in w

oll

M-4, casusd by.pumping v

eil

24.

on J

une

21-2

2, 19

55.

JLs Ecntioaad pr^rrloasly tha Urea tons OCCTIT* at eltitude*

-50 feet ia this area en3 thd doptfcm of stich esttxario* as tba Beaufort,

, sad Coo*ai* HIvara cay occpcsaa tha aquifer to ffalt water. ThH3 9

Gi^ratico of salt vator frea A place vhara th« a^tttfer 1» ia

vlth s«*a w&ter Is couaid«or««d ono of th« moat probabl* proea&ses

ijbieb costâizsatica occurs la tliia ore&« Ik>vevcrt coctâirAtioa cay

about Is other vaya* Ibus^ if tb* hiî vat«r lersla ia th« areas

tho l^ral A.lr Station «x4 tha lovar part of th» Jericbo waill

2} fiald occar &« a result of rochcrg* f^rta tbti \ottezwtaibl3

t&roogh dl^coctintsitisia la tb* femficisf lagrfer** tban eontasiiaatloca caa

occnr ia t2»s* &re*ta 1?7 a aoY«»Kat of aMsltj^ starf2Le« vat^ thrmsgh^tha

g^.p ia tb« coafinl^f j^td, Tbia r^r accouat for tha «xmtsaiaA.ticai la

th« Burton (town) fcrera., Bâr JLbagot« Cre^c*

A zmsbsr of tiralrtsdnaS depn&»aiou»t Icc^lly called B siiih5

prasent tbrtm|£»0ut th« arotu This topo^rephic faatere xa«^f bo

bl« for tbo 4i»coctis«itl«» or brîika -is th«

local 3*?chArg* to ta>e plac*» . Tb» erig^La or th»

for by (1) GDdar^rouod »olx;ti«ai fo»i:s£ caTitlns »Mcb

ly fHls4 vitli sasd, (2) irtiêea eroaioa during Lata Tsrtiiiry

or Plsiatocena lias vhlsî cut throaî th» confining laytaxa, fbrains

vhich bave »iac» b«»n filled with »And, or (3) tfeissic disturbaiacfi«

th» Cliarltsatcn ®Artijqtak» -or oca* prsriotis «arth<yaait«# vhich

frnctore* is th* casfiaii^ bod a»d fill*d then with sa^d both

is» of th» qaak» nnr*. at »O3» 0ub»aq»«:t tlss* Whatcrar thsir

th«ir prwecc* could aecottr^ for the local r«char^t* to tha art®-

f^r and vouh! i£x^r»«»o the possibilities of salt vater

j (icr?nvard oêpag^. U'ell 1-2 ia ia OB* or tbosa alz&fr, cyad it3

loTc*l la craa of t>^ hi^bast ia tb«

-20-

Maodcrff beliored that the source of conteatlnatlon in the Jericho

vail field vaa the lateral sdgr&tlcn of salt vater frcaa Batter/ Crfcak,

Bat, &3 ho swatlcned, thars is also the possibility of corjtsaliia,tloa by

& rhymers t of salt vat*r through defective veils.

^.ttlAtio^ betvygp ftcrpaga gag CMorifJe Co^ten^

Figure 6 ahowa the relationship between the puspaô and chlcriil^ '»

content of v«ll vatora a a reported "by thti 24alnt«naiiefl JDopcrtênt of tb«

riarlco Corp Recruit Dapot* Eitb«r th« data la cot Bttffieiaatly

/or els« th* relationship is Vft^wi at best. Sca« gasjeral ccofcitdtyX

'rails but tb* period of hiîiât puapag* (liarcb 1952) coiccidca vith a

period of lew avsraz» chlorida coiat «t«

Fiîr^ji 7, S, 9> 10, IX, BQ& 12, show th» eoapsridoo between

jpaga frca IniiTidaal veil* vith tho arwra^* chloride content of

vat«ra, as reported by th« Karin* Corp Recruit Dapot* 7b» docrralatiocj

t,9tv««n pi22",pa£» and chloride is fair to poor* *b* corralation la beat

ia th» «!atA frcss -s^lla 6, 22, aad 29 (fi^rrwi 9> 1C, and 12 r**p«ctivaly)

ell in th» Burton van fi«ld.

^Tia hi^htrst chlorids rsportad frca veils Optra ted by tb* Iteriaa Corp

Hecnxit J>pot is obtained from vail 3 in the Jericho veil field* Figure

13 represents the ocgthly pnesp&g* ia wells 3» 21, CTvl the mra of pwtpogs

frcs 21 a»d 22 sjs eoaparad \dtb tbe ebloride content of vatera frca vail

3» It 5s..ty b« inwn that there is little It any ccnforaity batveea the

ciarr^ji represent lag pnapô froa veil 3 vith tha chloride content» shit

v»ll 3 la pcEr>«d Jta xcrsiraê of only & hours p«r BJOath» Eovflrrr, the

curro ropr<»3«itinj pu»pag« f r&a veil 21 and that representing the total

pipage of valla 21 5t»d 22 (n*3artMit roâlarly pjuped veils to tha Jsriebo

vail fliM shotf a rwch closear corralaticn vith tho curre

±r±f+4-H~t i 1 L *_. . - i- 1-*.-

., _^_L_Lî-I_.L

H-l H-+-I-4-H-j j j I } _, I [_. i _J L. i i r i , i i i

ii c- tr ^ /; J O c." H > O jf « 1C c > 7." J O tJ V- > c> 3- ed c :; >- r _i O ft. J- *w < D. v *> ~> :j "* o o ui ^ ui < a. i -js rs ::) u o o u .r u.- < ". J 3 r> r> u o ou. ? < j: -, -^ <o»O^'0->^y'<-<: ->->-<

Pumpage versus average salinity in wells opi

V^4i:ti-j:H:.:

: , - J. r.t 4-i-j- -4-+ H-J-T H i-r4- -!-nr- i~Hu: :A:r.tt:ri'TT'L";. :r:r;:izr.!:tr"t: ;^::;;Zîni!

-1" -!i miii_i.'T~Tr["_iT- nrr 4~i_i' r~r~|~ T. inr~

, _ <- . > . _ .. < i < "> r i » ^ i o . i < uj '..-.< -3 -,_>.» o w < u < o. * .» r> :> u O o '' < LJ -t c. < - rj> 3 i.; cj o iu < uj < o. < _, ^ r> u o O ^ < inT ...» - -, -, - * ' ) - M -i w < 3 :-> :i < i-- -.5- a - x 5 < :- -.-. < o o ^- o -. u. s- -^ ? z . -» < u. o r fj -^ u. 5 <>-,->< ci o r Q -, L.

L9.CLj_ _ 195i___ 1954.__ 1955 _

vveiis op ofn ?o.V^ j Vi i v-. by ' M.C.R.D., Parris Island, S. C.

u Merer uiscnarge X-Computed Discharge

i : r ; ..4 4 ; - |--I : ' - 4-.f_L_a i_l r!_

. -, i- -^-;- r , r -iu-

.(.1 -- ri »r t: > ^ j - .-." . " ,-" ci !- r.; > ^' .; d c." »--' .> o r' » c r: X r' J o o.' H >' o z a c- nr v jr' J d n." t^ >' <)

L'*-JLîl?.iL-:.il?! " : -IllliiJiL" 8 ° ^ - " § "5 3^JLo_A>JAi.lAls.8_5_o f 1954 !935 195S I 19 5Z__

,ris Island, S. C.

Jan

. F

eb.

Mar

. A

pr.

May

1955

an

e Ju

ly

Aug

.S

ept.

O

ct.

No..

Do

a 3

ti)

T '

8 M a1-

PU

MP

AG

E

20!

181

Ippm

)K.

rt -

?ir:

n«e«

«r.

i ch

iori

da

cont

ent

of

vat

or

free

voll

Hot

23

, P

orr

is I

slan

d,

.S.C

»

Fig. 9

- P

umpa

ge a

nd c

hlor

ide

cont

ent

of water f

rom ve

il N

o, 6

, Pa

rris

In

Pd

rris

Is

lan

d

wel

l B

P?

Co*.

Jan.

Fab

.M

ar.

Apr

.M

ayJu

neJu

ly

. A

ug.

Sep

t.

Oct

. -N

ov.

Da

PU

MP

AG

E

! a 0) Pi W Mi

7?

i 0 5. 4

:

24 i

a 3 23'

21 20

<

\S

AL

T

(ppm

)

%

k

A\

/

V

I § I

Jan*

Feb

.M

ar.

Apr

,M

ay

PU

MP

AG

E

Aug

,

1 \ \

Sept

,O

ct;. *

26 221

SA

LT

Fie

* 11

- P

urcp

iiro

and

chlo

rid

o c

onto

nt

of

vatr

r fr

coi

veil

I.'o

. ?7

..3

c.

8PT

Co.

/fil

l

Jan.

Fe

b.

Mar

,A

pr,

May

1955

Ju

neS

ept.

O

ct.

9; 8; k 7; 6-

13!

PU

MP

AG

E

i...

SA

LT

i

\

Figu

re

12.

- Pu

mpa

ge a

nd c

hlor

ide

cont

ent

of w

a,te

r fr

onj

wel

l 29

? P

arn'

s Is

land

, ST

C

chlorides. This tends to subatantiate th» atatesxant that th« chlor;lla

cont&nt incraaaos 'vith tha piszpaga, otb&r factors being oqiial,

1b«tv«»on iJat^T I/gyalii ar4

to principled ârvalopad l?y several irrrestigatcra, th<*

contact batvên £rs*h and salt vatar in an aquifer hydraulic Ally cc *~

n«cted with th« 9c«. la d«t4sroio«d approximately ly th« dlffcrencn iu

b»ad betv«>aa th* waiter ia tad ftq'oifor an/1 that in tba ocean «cnd by 1^»

relatlr* spftclfio gravities of the tvo TiKitars* Ih» frsab vatsr b«5.,-j

lighter, vill float oa salt y&t«r» If the aTarrag* 3p*cifie gravity of

0SA water i» as surfed aa 1.C525 *»i that of fr*sh vatsr ad 1»C, then :Vt

vill raquir* 41 foot of fr*3h t*ater baad to balajoe* 40 Ten*! of sea it«r

und if an fûif «r 13 in contact vitb t&a sertt «.t A d^pth of 40 t o«t > >lov

»»* l^T*ly thea cii* foot of fVesh vater bemd abors s*a lev«l will "L *

required la ordaor to prerent tho saOYesaent of salt vater into t^« £^: .ii«»

fer*

Bow8T^rf the»» priacipl*a ar« not strictly valid as they asst: > a

»tat» of hydrostatic «*qttillbri«a b«tv»«n fresb asd italt vat^sr^ wbe.- xs,

ia fact, th» freab groand-*at<ar i» continually in jaotien, «md th» ' *

flaid* sro in dyaajaio equilibrita*

Tignrti IA la a graph of tha saonthly l»Tdls in v«lls 21 sasd 25 .

the r«port^d cblcarid*r,co»t«ait i» th»»* volla diaricg tha t>»riod3 Oc

1951 to May 1752 asd l^rch 1953 to Jacaary 1956. There Ia soa* d-i-

of c cmalation batv»«a th» ctcnrss but HOB* whara the change* of vt.i

loral and chlorid* content or» ss&ll* Cf posadblft aipaificanca ia

fact, crident fro» tha ci=rvo«, that the r&ns'a of vat^rw-lanral and r

in the second period of record ia about twiea tbAt of tho

June

10.0

cr oEV.

a>CL

C/J

O C7>

C O

o<a.E .->

CL

compared with cloride c

n welisi 3icsid iElan'd the combined pumpaqe! from iwÎls 2liand! : i I ; i 'I r » , . ! r . .

ide content; of water in W8lli

22,!

/ &lltiOT»al ?a.etor3 Concornir.g Chloride in Ground V

Additional f acta, partinant to th» probl«a of chlorld* content^

isclode tJha degree of accuracy obtained or refinaasnt osad .In' reportlcg

th» ehlorido* IB grouud-wat«r* 7h« January usonthly report of tha Karina

Corp P.acrolt Depot watar sspply reported a *salt» contact of 24 ppa for*

th« v&tsr in vail 6» Tha rapcrt^ cturat'cna of pumpage for this voll

wa» 134 bctrrs disrinj th« &o&th^ vbleh la cccaidaraHy lea* than t*:»

cu3b*r of hoiars th» veil la jsapud on «sn eirerag^ H&ea & s±apl« of

frca this vail vaa collected on Jssuary 27, and finalys^d in tbo U«3

Geological Saanroy laboratory, tha chloride contest v&a only 6 ppa* 2

lorly th* monthly Harlso Corp Kocruit Depot report for April, 1955 re

ported th« salt content of vat«r fVca v«ll 26 as 24 p?a. Th^ &a^pl« fro*

this v*ll, collected at the eas* tlr« and &o&ly&ad by tb« tJ»^

bad a chloride contcort of only 8*5 ppa» 1h» r»aacn far

la not &ppfersnt» It sugr t* noted hcwrorj th.\t a

râ v&U E?7-OL03» loc*tad Oft the uorth sid« of th« Bsral Air

Station and fcrsarlj' ovned l^r th« irask Plarrtatlon,

U.S. Geological Sianr^ labcratcsry aa hirrlr^ 22 ppa of chlorlda which la

of tha D&is* aag!iit»2« &M th» salt conttsat reported by th» Jtarin* Corp

Hacruit Depot for th» S«7al Air Statical valla. It 10 posaibla that th*

W3alt* content r»port?5d by th« Koris« Corp Eecrait B#pot do«a

th« total rait or salinity of th» vatsr rather than Jiiat

wrltar cheeked vllb the î&iK

aertt, ha was isforr^d that tha v&ter vas tested for chlorida only*

The veils op^rntad bj th» City of Beaufort have been repo

hiî in chloride M> higji in fact that z»cas« v«sll3 had to b« shut

for a prjriod* AJ iTiiicat^d in th« '*ucdcrff r^pcjrt, this ni^ht ba expect

ed to ccciar in th« veil at tha Cotrrt Hotuki bacaus* of it3 prmisitiy -to

NO. ,«iltO. rivg Tt**» »v x 100 oiv OOK COMPANY, INC. NOHWOOb. MA««ACHU»«TT«.

MIBT0 ! .«

Static water level, in fe»t, below measuring point*

Chlorides in parts par million

th* salty msrfsca uatcsr, But^ on occasion* tba asaa difficulty has

r»perts?i with city usll 5 at Epaaiab Volls. TMa vail is located i

vicinity of cue of th« uo-callsd «si3ikji% ;se2Qt!cn«i abcra* 5Jr»

, a local driller h&3 pentSsacd tha possibly that tha high

in tfcb wsGLl va^ e-retstctt-tf tha dl»chi2-«

tbo vat*r aoftaiior into the caarfcy "sink* end tJrt circulation of

vatcsr back into t5i» vall» This appoors to be a rery logical

fcr the ccaitcEilii«tdca of thl3 vsll, r>nd coald

eepirg th» veil ia operation nrx! &t th» ssa« tlpo digpcs^ng of

brina rackvash in other areas. Jtoothar poâible cftusa of tha

tlca ccxtld b» a doycward ceepag'e'of aiearfcy salty staff ac» vater

acd thsuce to th» veil*

o

tbcva tb© sa&lys** of vatcor frca el^rt vella la

vator frca tiwi dôpsr aquifers la tyricaHy btsie, very

soft, b!a^ in sodi^rs biearbeesftte and fluortdftf ssd lev in Iron* Va

frca tbs Ubi»sto»» fiqulfor i» sObaoat neutralt qolta bard, and

bis!h ia ircu or ehlorid«* It la a

tcf3poratur» of tha vatar froa tbo d0op veils on Farri* lalacd 43

about 103^?* viieraeui tbo t«np«iaratar« of tbo oatfcr frca tba li±

equif ar is issmlly between 62°F» end

CCKCLOSIOJS

squif sr ua«d in tb« P&rrla lalaisd area is &

to vhita foaxiliT eroua liseatono of £oe«s» to «ioccs» age vbicb

at altltadea of apcrcoctaaLtdly -50 F&et, It la Approxiaatdly TOO feat

thlclc cr4 Incl-adea all tha calcaraotts ddpcaita dovn to eoad including

tbos<» of early Docer.* tisia*

-24-

format! oiai In tha vicinity of Porria Island proper, contains

sallna or brackish vattar dovn to 2&00 foot* Pat In craa^ to the r-ortb-

vast froa tire vicinity of Burton tov&rda Isaacs**, It i» protabl * that

2ra of tbr-30 deeper forri&tlonj vill contela frsah vator*

lorel* in tha velle on Pert Hojal Inland &re *ffsctad t>y

^ baroaatric prssstare eod t^ influeiica of poapln* D-2ar1^r ^'alla*

Th» Siaxlaiaa recorded range in vater lov»l caused by the infl^*nc-«> of "

tld^ asoJEja.ted to 4>»45 fe^t* the range of reported vatar IGTÎS dua to

dlffaraccâ In esottat of v&ter puaped esourrted to sore thsa 10 feet In

the Ecrtofi well field* 72ie racorsry of vatar larsls in tb» ûrtca veil

fi&ld, after siaitttcu dcwn fell v»ll3 for a period of 12 hcur3^ caisaed a

1 foot risa In veil K-^t ap53-oxk=ately one sll« vest of the Bur-tea vails»

The erarage pieaoaetria surface In the £*tirtoa well field baa de

clined lâe than 2 fest since 1944* Hoveirnr, t!i«r« ere csrtAln ccatpll-

factors irrrol-rsdi (1) *idil flucto&tlosa In scse of the vella ara

th«a the decline^ (2) It ha» not yet been determined with eert&lcty

vfe«th«r the datan iiaed la deteraftilng the altitude of eeAsisring points

on veils v*3 s*«an low v^tea* or rsean sea lerelj (3) The dlsfcributioa of

*e b»«a» citâ^sd l?y the aASition of seraaral veil* eince 19^44

th« total passage a^p^reotly fcaa not Increased ssueh (4) The3

»ethc<S of nea»crln.5 water lovalji by saans of en elr gstge la r»t sstsffl-*

ciently accurate*

Ths plsscsai»triff rrorfacw, fiJ deteradxftd In valla sxt^zsdli^ fro» the

lover p;.rt of Saapton County to the lover port of Jasper County and the

east am pstrt of ?ft-âfort Cotsity, has apparently declined frca 1 to 4

fast, Kowev^r, th^ veils are do** to th» coast ecd feffectsd by the

tic a ^rii the veils s<r:thv*3t of -êrria IrJ&nd J^y b» Influenced tj pin-

-25-

Vhereas the aquifer in the fcortbveat&rn part of the era* doubtless

recharge* froa an crsa £4reral zniloa inland, it Is possible that

local recharge occurs through discontinuities in the ccsifining bod, aa,

for instates through cink3 or through the confining bed itsalf »

The trsnsftissihilitj of the lisu»atond aquifer in the vicinity of

the Burton veil field ia approximately 90,000 gpdl/ft*

that tha transzaicaibility ôcrceiswi in th^ nortij*rn or

diTi^ction* £c:rurata data hav» y«t to fca obtained in order to detonaia*

this pcaaibllitj^ The coefficiant of ctoraga is approxiratalj 1 x

Th» eqaif sr can be coGtusijBa.t«5 with salt vstsr Igr <5o«cward

latoral rsigratlon, uw&rd aoYoaettt of underljlng vater» and

through dcfoetlTd valla » Although all of th«s* factors say INI sors or

less oparativa in thia area, those consiJerod to be the ono« BD3t likelj

to csu3« problcas of caacroacha«at ar« tb* downward o»cp<ige and lateral

hydrauULcallj connected with salt v&t«r

vill certainly bacoas contaainated uhen the ha&d of fr*ah vat^r ia rcdtsoed

to caa leral and the gradient between the veil and the ceesn is 3

direction of tha vsll, lioverar, tbe proatljr reduced posspage ia tha

cho veil field has apj>ar<mtly had the effect of forming a fresh vatstr

barrier bstvestj that area of probable ecnta*isation arsd the Burton veil

f iold* But it vould b« via* to maintain a vigilant check en the pcsei

bllitj of esstisaiâticn reaching the Burton vail field frca other directions,

as for Itistacca ia the eaatsra or northaastara direct* cm tovsrffl

of &s.rtsxu

Otbnr factors beia^ ©qiaal, the chloride content of the vail vatcr

to varj dir<*ctljr vith th» coount of vatwrr pusiped* îscharffa of

at&cl «f fluent* iB the -ricinity of ptapod vello ia also l

to cause high chloride in the jxxaped vater*

Any at-. cap t at this tlua to estimate the probable safe yield vhiea

the principal liaestose aqolf car could fisrcish in this area voold be at

best a slightby less t!ian hazardous goes*. The data collected to data

tre so liaitep and eo subject to error in rany respects, that no depen

dence on such an eatisate aa a fira figure in warranted.

The net supply of groczd-4/ftter available for use by the ailitary

establiabfteata vlll be dininiahsd ty iacrâsir^; dyifttrds for irrigatic&al

tiae Tor large track f anas in the vicinity of the Bartoa Lobeeo tres*

Plans already in progress to derelop liorge additional tract* of acreage

bj cupplea-aat&l irrigation ifidieate that larger aaounts of gronnd-vater

vill be t2sed for this porpoae ia the Jiear future*

As sizessrisod ia Table 3^ *k* present «»ppl7 veils for sdlitarj

tatalrllshaenta in the Parrls ^slaad arsa hare a potential yield of 10*2

aillion.1 gill cms per day* Severer, ptsrpaê frca each veil has been Hal

ted to aa arbitrary "safe-yield* vhieh, if all the vails vera paped 24

hctrra per day, vould yield 8»57 nillion gallons.* However, such a

puoplzig schedule is cot ordiratrily adrisable^ so that thd total

ia 7*16 sgd if the psapa are operated 20 hours per day; £»29

vbem operating 12 hctcra per day and 2*37 &gd vhen operated 8 hvors par

d^y* These figures include puapage f roa the deep veils* It appears

feasible that additional veils could be added to this systat to develop

CLJJ ailiticcal 1500 gpa or a total yield of 8.96 C£df vhen operated 20t

h era per day and ts±ng the ceep veils* 7ba»e figtzrea talc en frca Tablei

rg enonnts of vatcr arallaMe as

dul3. Ecsuerer, .the reader Is cautioned that tho&e figizres do cot ta2te

jbsto ccriaSderation »xxdi liaitinj factors a« the daoagor of 3*lt vator

Tab

le 3

. S

ugar

y o

f dal

ly p

umpn

gfi.i

nx

rtiJ

labi

lo f

rom

exis

ting a

nd a

ddit

ional

wal

ls

' .

in t

he

Par

ris

Isla

nd a

rea.

Tota

l purapage i

n million

gall

ons

per day vh

en

pumps

are

operated a

t "s

afe-

yiel

d "I/

WeH F

ield

Jericho

Burt

on

Nava

l Ai

r Station

P.I. De

ep V

.'el

lsi

?low

or

Pump

1 Pre

sent

sup

ply wi

th d

eep

well

s fl

owing

Present

supply wit

h de

ep

veil

s pu

mpin

pr

Prob

able

additional

supp

lyTo

tal

supp

ly «

- de

ep w

ells;

flow

ing =

(A)

Tota

l ou

pply

- d

cop vo

lla

pumpinj? = (B)

Pump

age

(A)

with J

ericho

shut d

own

Pump

age

(B)

with

Jer

icho

shut d

own

Rate

d Yi

eld

(gallons pe

r mi

nute

)

700

4200 750

190

1450

5790

7100

"Saf

e-Yi

eld"

(inan) 550

3400 550

190

1450

4690

5950

1500

6190

7450

5640

6900

Hour

s24

hrs.

0,80

4.S9

0.60

0.27

2.09

6.76

8.57

2.16

3.Q1

10.7

3

8,12

9.94

pump

ed o

ut o

f20 h

rs,

0.67

4,08

0.67

0.27

1.74

5.69

7.16

1.80

7. '.

"3

8.96

6,77

8.28

each

24

12 h

rs.

0.40

2,45

0.40

0.27

1.04

3.52

4,29

1,08

.',./.

*

5.37

4.06

4.97

8 hrs.

0.27

1.63

0.27

0.27

0.70

2.44

2.87>

0,72

r*~

3.59

2,71

:.£i

. «»

1/a

rbii

rart

^pr

redu

ced

rate

, g

ener

ally

abo

ut 8

0 pe

r ce

nt

of p

ump

cap

acit

y.

DSA

UTO

Ki

COi'

CHEM

ICA

L A

NA

LYSE

S

(Res

ults

in

par

ts p

er m

illi

on e

xcep

t S

peci

fic

Con

duct

ance

and

pH

)

o n

(U

CX.

o a

3 S

o CO

Pn

rria

Is

land

PFT

-10

Par

ria

Isla

nd

BFT

-11

Pri

tch

ard

vil

le

BFT

-100

Po

rt R

oyal

,S

.C., B

FT-1

02

Tra

sk P

lanta

.B

FT-1

03

Bur

ton

- P

ines

Mot

or C

ourt

Bea

ufo

rt,

S.C

,B

FT-1

06

Bur

ton

wel

l fi

<RP

T-1

1 4B

eauf

ort-

Mix

edfi

nis

hed

wat

er

from

cit

v v

el};

< <

H-1

C s"

V \'\

^BOO

770Q

xp-

to ^00

ino^ 8}

Id 100

2- 8

^

2>

3,

5.

bel

li1

3^5

c o*-

4 4-

fU

OJ

U

*-*

6

* «o

m

O

O

«fl

0

Oct

.?0

/V,

Oct

.15

/54

Oct

.a/5

3

Apr

il21

/55

Aug

.27/5

4

Oct

. 20

/5A

Bar

.25

/55

Apr

il21

/55

Dac

lyO

V> .

12/5

1

o O

4

CO

1? 19 45 12 10 w 9.4

(JU c «i

.99

.10

.10

.00

.20

.01

QO

.54

~ c o

O

-P

.10

.20

.15

.09

l.Q

.08

.29

.

6 o a

<

L)

(J

^ f

'

1.0

21 107

17 38 44 40

6 w> j

y

en 3 ,5 C

10 6.5

1.7

2.5

2.6

1.7

<TJ

ZS ^

^

e «o

H

(TJ

T3

*-' t

o o

rz:

Na-

486

Ks=

4.9

Ka=

4l2

K«4

.4

13 Na=

313

K*1

.2

Na-

13

K=

.7

Nas

4.6

K=

.8

16

P (U o*ro

,»U

Of-l

0

o h:

H A

11,7

0

1000 131

146

50fl

121

114

,147 98

1

ou «*i

Q

a *^ 1^

3

1.2

7.6

18

8 1 4.9

1.5

31

o H

o U

r- «

>-^

U 58 10 3.5

282

22 6.2

24 8.5

20

41 o O^

u« 4,7

4.1 .5 .1 .1 .0 fl 2

1 ,

0) «0

CO

z 2.S

3.6 ^ .6 .0 .5 .0 .2 .3

^

a > -o

o -«

</)

O

Q 1<?O

Q

10JO 16

2

815

155

143

171

..

<o M

ro

TJ

ro

X

6 4 94 294

105

120

307

U cU

«J

o -o

jol

(X 0

CO

0

1900

1630 243

1170

4130

' 21

6

274

256

294

2/

In

solu

tion a

t ti

me

of a

nal

ysi

s fc

/ U

icxo

raho

s at

25UC

.

,

£/

8.1.

8.5

7.8

7.2

7.2

(

7.3

7.6

7.5

7.0

Chi

anic

eJ a

nal

yse

s of

gr

ound

wat

er

in B

eauf

ort.

Ctf

ppty

, S

.C.

-

Vith ttte reservation that th* data ere not stiff iciently reliable

or ccaapleto, it Is estimated that the total supply, that tti^fat be safely

vitbdreva frca the lireatone aquifer is between 3 end 6 all 11 DP gallons

per day* In eadrgsncêa, larger supplies can be puspod for short

periods* An additional waoont of vater night be obtained by allowing

the de*p v&lls on F&rris ^slend to be ptssped for the £pr&ater proportion

of any 24. bc\ir period** «

The abore figures are h!gîly conjectural* The aqnlfer sdght safely

provide sore than the sncnmt estis&ted* On the other ho&d, stich factorsi

as deepening of the Port Hojal channel, the iccraaded use of gronnd-vatsor

for irri^tion, and the possibilities of eontaoinatioa by Tcortical deep-

age9 ciiît singljr or collectively liait the eafe yield to &oae lessori

caiount* Farther etujy should be giveo to the problea is order to select

favorable locations for additional veils* &ose areas vbicb, at the

present tiswi^ appear a*xst fsrorable are (1) frca Burton nortbvest

Grey's Hill to Garden* s Corner* and (2) southwest of the Burton veil

field en the vest side of Broad Hiver and north of Spring Island*

Documents

Sipl» AprU 1956 - pubs.usgs.gov · PDF file6 f cr 6 hears at 630 gpai _____ » Cro«3 tieotiaB frca Saval Air Station to Jerieho fiaU, shoving ... of granrsfly s&sd, clay, llnwatooa,