Part A: School Improvement Planning

2010-2011

Strategic Goal(s): √ Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5

PL

AN

SIP Goal: Students will master the material expected of them at their grade levels.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound):

Each quarter the percentage of students receiving content not yet mastered quarter grades will decrease by 5%

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence: SOL Test Results 2009 – 2010

Math = 90% 6th

= 100%, 7th

= 88%

Reading = 54.5% 6th

= 100% 7th

= 44%

History = 59% 6th

= 75% 7th

= 55%

Anticipated Obstacles:

Continuing work on test taking strategies and student stamina

Continuing work on individualized instruction specifically targeting reading

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes): Indicators: SOL tests, classroom assessments, Map testing

ST

UD

Y

KPI Data (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4 KPI Data

1. Map Assessment Exceed Met Below

R – 21% 14% 66%

M – 25% 17% 58%

<Enter Actual School

Metric Here>

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

Not available yet

1

2. Released SOL Met benchmark

Math 6 54.6%

Math 7 46.9%

Math 8 52.3%

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

SOL scores:

Reading: 73%

Math: 88%

Science: 75%

Writing: 56%

Social Studies: 33%

3. Classroom Assessments All Courses

Content Not Mastered

17.4%

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

Key Strategies

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies

1.Map Assessment will be given,

analyzed and shared among staff –

beginning, midyear and end

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

Not yet available

DO

&

2. Released SOL will be given in

Reading, Math, History, 8th

Writing and Science quarterly

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

See SOL scores above

ST

UD

Y &

3.

4.

AC

T

2

Part A: School Improvement Planning

2010-2011

Strategic Goal(s): Goal 1 √ Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5

PL

AN

SIP Goal: 90% of our students will pass their Reading SOL tests or demonstrate growth in reading as measured

in other ways (istation, Read 180,Wilson Reading, CRI.)

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound):

Each quarter the compiled reading data will show 100% of participating students movement toward the next tier – 1 – 2 – 3 as

measured by the iStation reading program.

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence: : SOL Test Results 2009 – 2010

Math = 90% 6th

= 100%, 7th

= 88%

Reading = 54.5% 6th

= 100% 7th

= 44%

History = 59% 6th

= 75% 7th

= 55%

Anticipated Obstacles:

Scheduling and staffing additional reading program support outside of the regularly scheduled Language Arts time.

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes): istation, Read 180, Wilson Reading, CRI Reading Data

ID07 A Leadership Team consisting of the principal, teachers who lead the Instructional Teams, and other key professional

staff meets regularly (twice a month or more for an hour each meeting).

ID10 The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at school performance data and aggregated classroom observation data

and uses that data to make decisions about school improvement and professional development needs

IIA02 Units of instruction include standards‐based objectives and criteria for mastery.

ST

UD

Y

3

IIIA05 All teachers maintain a record of each student’s mastery of specific learning objectives.

KPI Data (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4 KPI Data

1. iStation Reading Growth November Summary

Tier 3 58%

Tier 2 23%

Tier 1 19%

<Enter Actual School

Metric Here>

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

2. Read 180 Reading Growth Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

3. Wilson Reading Growth Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

1 student improved 6

grade levels. 2 students

improved 2 + grade

levels and 1 student

improved 1 grade level

4. CRI Reading Growth Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

Key Strategies

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies

1. Leadership Meetings

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

Please refer to mid-year

report submitted to the

board in April

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

DO

&

2. Aggregate Data Review 73% total reading pass STUDY &

4

rate.

3. Standards Based objectives and

Mastery Criteria reviewed

4. Individual Student mastery

records reviewed

AC

T

5

Part A: School Improvement Planning

2010-2011

Strategic Goal(s): Goal 1 Goal 2 √ Goal 3 Goal 4 Goal 5

PL

AN

SIP Goal: All teachers will develop and teach one/two arts infused units per quarter

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound): Each Quarter a staff meeting will be devoted to

all teachers sharing their results of the arts-infused unit / project(s) with rubrics and criteria for mastery

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence: SOL Test Results 2009 – 2010

Math = 90% 6th

= 100%, 7th

= 88%

Reading = 54.5% 6th

= 100% 7th

= 44%

History = 59% 6th

= 75% 7th

= 55%

Anticipated Obstacles:

Adequate time to meet and share

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

IIIA09 All teachers clearly state the lesson’s topic, theme, and objectives.

ST

UD

Y

KPI Data (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4 KPI Data

1. Minimum of one unit / project

for each teacher per quarter

delivered and assessed

Each teacher submitted

at least one unit.

Each teacher submitted

at least one unit.

Each teacher submitted

at least one unit.

Each teacher submitted

at least one unit.

6

2. Faculty meeting time devoted

to sharing results of arts infused

unit / project per quarter

Planning day was

devoted to this

Two afternoon

meetings were devoted

to this.

Key Strategies

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies

1. IIIA09 All teachers clearly

state the lesson’s topic, theme,

and objectives.

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

DO

&

2. Thematic Unit developed from

team sharing for each quarter

“Perfect Storm” Brainstormed several

topics for end of the

year.

ST

UD

Y &

3.

4.

AC

T

7

School Scorecard

Part B of School Improvement Planning 2010 – 2011

Instructions: In the yellow fields highlighted below, please fill in the school’s progress towards Division-level performance indicators by the following dates for each quarter

(<insert dates>). For questions regarding how to calculate your school’s progress, please contract Chris Gilman via email at cgilman@k12albemarle.org or by calling the

Department of Accountability, Research and Technology at 434-872-4569.

Goal 1: Prepare all students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy

Priority 1.1: Implement the Framework for Quality Learning, the Division’s curriculum, assessment, and instruction model,

in all learning communities.

KPI: 100% of all teachers (individually and/or as represented by PLC teams) will upload a unit, resource, lesson, or

assessment to SchoolNet that reflects project-based learning, mid-to-high-level Bloom’s, Marzano’s strategies, and/or

engaging qualities

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 100% 100% 100 100%

KPI: 65% of classroom walkthroughs will report evidence of middle to high levels of Bloom’s

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 47% 55% 40%

Priority 1.2: Assess level of student engagement in learning communities, identifying and enhancing practices connected to

high levels of student engagement.

KPI: No more than 5% of students will be chronically absent (missing 10% of school days) at each quarter

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 25% 38% 26%

8

KPI: 55% of classroom walkthroughs will report evidence of more than one engaging quality

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 41% 50% 67%

Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap

Priority 2.0: Through common rigorous assessments and use of high-yield instructional strategies all students will meet high

expectations for performance and achievement as measured by:

KPI: 100% of K-12 courses in reading and math will use rigorous common (minimum - at the school level) quarterly

assessments

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 100% 100 100%

KPI: 95% of students will demonstrate proficiency on common quarterly assessments (i.e. PALS, DSA, feeder

pattern math assessments, MAP, etc.)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 (Enter school progress towards Division-level performance indicator for each

quarter.) 57% 55% n/a

KPI = Key Performance Indicator

9