Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 1
Simulating Membrane Channels
Part III. NanotubesTheory, Methodology
Theoretical and Computational BiophysicsDec 2004, Boston, MA
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/
Carbon NanotubesHydrophobic channels - Perfect Models
for Membrane Water Channels
A balance between the size and hydrophobicity
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 2
Carbon NanotubesHydrophobic channels - Perfect Models
for Membrane Water Channels
• Much betterstatistics
• No need formembrane andlipid molecules
Carbon NanotubesHydrophobic channels - Perfect Models
for Membrane Water Channels
• Much betterstatistics
• No need formembrane andlipid molecules
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 3
Water Single-files in Carbon Nanotubes
Water files form polarized chains innanotubes
Water-nanotube interaction can beeasily modified
Hummer, et. al., Nature, 414: 188-190, 2001
Modifying chargesModifying vdW parameters
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 4
Calculation of Diffusion Permeability from MD
Φ0: number of watermolecules crossing thechannel from the left to theright in unit time
0!=
A
wd
N
Vp
Φ0 can be directly obtained throughequilibrium MD simulation by counting “fullpermeation events”
carbohydrate
440 nm
scattered light
H2O carbohydrate + H2O
lipid vesicles
channel-containingproteoliposomes
shrinking reswelling
100 mM Ribitol
Liposome Swelling Assay
GlpF is an aquaglyecroporin:both water and carbohydratecan be transported by GlpF.
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 5
Chemical Potential of Waterln
:
:
:
:
:
:
= + +
standard chemical potential of water
molar fraction of water
the gas constant
temperature
pressure
molar volume of water
o
w w w
o
w
w
w
wX
R
T
P
V
RT X PVµ µ
µ
membrane
(2)(1)
W W
purewater
purewater
0ln1 =!=wwXX
Water flow in either direction is thesame, i.e., no net flow of water.
Solutes Decrease the Chemical Potential of Water
ww
o
wwPVXRT ++= lnµµ
)2(ln)1(lnwwXRTXRT <
)2()1(ww
µµ <!
Semipermeablemembrane
(2)(1)
W+S W
purewater
dilutesolution
1)2( 1)1( =<wwXX
Water establishes a net flow fromcompartment (2) to compartment (1).
Addition of an impermeable solute toone compartment drives the systemout of equilibrium.
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 6
Establishment of Osmotic Equilibrium
Semipermeablemembrane
(2)(1)
W+S W
purewater
dilutesolution
1)2( 1)1( =<wwXX
ww
o
w
ww
o
w
VPXRT
VPXRT
)2()2(ln)2(
)1()1(ln)1(
++
=++
µ
µ
(2)(1) :um@equilibriww
µµ =
At equilibrium, the chemical potential ofany species is the same at every point inthe system to which it has access.
wwwVPVPXRT )2()1()1(ln =+
ln (1)! = "w w
PV RT X
Establishment of an Osmotic Equilibrium
Semipermeablemembrane
(2)(1)
W+S W
purewater
dilutesolution
1)2( 1)1( =<wwXX
ssw
ssw
XXX
XXX
!"!=#
<<=+
)1ln(ln
1 ; 1
Solute molar fraction in physiological(dilute) solutions is much smaller thanwater molar fraction.
s
w
RTP X
V!" = # =
ln (1)! = "w w
PV RT X
! =w s
PV RTX
Osmotic pressure
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 7
Establishment of an Osmotic Equilibrium
(2)(1)
W+S W
purewater
dilutesolution
1)2( 1)1( =<wwXX
Solute concentration (~0.1M) inphysiological (dilute) solutions is muchsmaller than water concentration(55M).
wsw
tot
s
w
w
w
s
w
s
ws
s
s
VCVV
n
V
V
n
n
n
n
nn
nX
==
=!+
=wsnn <<
s w s
w
RTP C V RTC
V! = " = =
! = " =s
w
RTP X
V
sP RT C!" = ! = !
Osmotic Flow of Water@equilibrium: 0P! "!# =
( )
v
v p
J P
J L P
! "!#
= ! "!#
Net flow is zero
Volumeflux ofwater
Hydraulicpermeability
( )vw f s
w
J PP A C
V RT
!" = = #!Molar flux
of water
Osmoticpermeability
(2)(1)
W+S W
purewater
dilutesolution
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 8
Simulation of osmotic pressure induced water transportmay be done by adding salt to one side of the membrane.
Semipermeablemembrane
(1)
(2)
There is a small problem with this setup!
NaClNa++Cl-
Problem: The solvents on the two sides of amembrane in a conventional periodic system are
connected.(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 9
We can include more layers of membrane and water tocreate two compartment of water that are not in contact
(2)
(1)
(1)
Semipermeablemembrane
Semipermeablemembrane
NaCl
Semipermeablemembrane
Semipermeablemembrane
(2)
(1)
(1)
NaCl
NaCl
U N
I T
C E
L L
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 10
The overall translationof the system isprevented by applyingconstraints or counterforces to the membrane.
membrane
membrane
membrane
water
water
Realizing a Pressure Difference in aPeriodic System
f is the forceon each watermolecule,for n watermolecules
1 2/P P nf P nf A= + !" = Fangqiang Zhu
F. Zhu, et al., Biophys. J. 83, 154 (2002).
Applying a Pressure DifferenceAcross the Membrane
/P nf A! =
Applyingforce on allwatermolecules.
Not a goodidea!
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 11
Applying a Pressure DifferenceAcross the Membrane
/P nf A! =
Applyingforce onbulk wateronly.
Very good
Applying a Pressure DifferenceAcross the Membrane
/P nf A! =
Applyingforce onlyon a slab ofwater inbulk.Excellent
Pf can be calculated fromthese simulations
( )w f s
PP A C
RT
!" = #!
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 12
Calculation of osmoticpermeability of water channels
pf: 7.0 ± 0.9 × 10-14 cm3/sExp: 5.4 – 11.7 × 10-14 cm3/spf: 1.4×10-13 cm3/s
GlpF Aquaporin-1
stereoisomers
Stereoselective Transport of Carbohydratesby GlpF
Some stereoisomers showover tenfold difference in
conductivity.
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 13
GlpF + glycerolGlpF + water
Channel Constriction
HOLE2: O. Smart et al., 1995
red < 2.3 Å 2.3 Å > green > 3.5 Å blue > 3.5 Å
Selectivity filter
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 14
Interactive Molecular Dynamics
VMD NAMD
Observed Induced Fit in Filter
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 15
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
-10 -7. -5 -2. 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12. 15
Confinement in Filter• Selection occurs in most constrained region.• Caused by the locking mechanism.
RM
S m
otio
n in
x a
nd y
z (Å)Filterregion
RibitolOptimal hydrogen bondingand hydrophobic matching
Arabitol10 times slower
Evidence for Stereoselectivity
Simulating Membrane Channels - Nanotubes 12/9/2004
Emad Tajkhorshid 16
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
-10 -7 -4 -1 2 5 8 11 14
Dipole Reversal in Channel• Dipole reversal pattern matches water.• Selects large molecules with flexible dipole.
cos(
dipo
le a
ngle
with
z)
z (Å)
Dipolereversalregion