27
Simona Cavalu Professor Preclinical Sciences Department Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutics University of Oradea ROMANIA

Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Developmentofanoptimalinterfacebetweenboneandorthopedicordentalimplant.Determiningwhetheranewlydevelopedimplantmaterialconfirmstotherequirementsofbiocompatibility,mechanicalstabilityandsafety.Theuseofanimalmodelsisanessentialstepintestingorthopedicanddentalimplantspriortoclinicaluseinhumans.

Citation preview

Page 1: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Simona CavaluProfessor

Preclinical Sciences Department

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutics

University of Oradea

ROMANIA

Page 2: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Motivation Development of an optimal interface between bone

and orthopedic or dental implant.

Determining whether a newly developed implantmaterial confirms to the requirements ofbiocompatibility, mechanical stability and safety.

The use of animal models is an essential step in testingorthopedic and dental implants prior to clinical usein humans.

Results from in vitro studies (cells culture) can bedifficult to extrapolate to the in vivo situations.

Page 3: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Factors for consideration when choosing an animal model

Implant design and surface texture

Animal selection: macrostructure, microstructure, bone composition, bone remodeling - similarities when comparing to the human bone

Costs to aquire and care for animals

Availability, acceptability to society

Tolerance to captivity and ease of housing.

International standard (ISO 10993-6) and Animal Protection Act.

Page 4: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Materials to be tested in this study Dense Al2O3-YSZ composites prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering

High performance biocomposite that combines the excellent material properties of alumina in terms of chemical stability and low wear and of zirconia with its superior mechanical strength and fracture toughness.

Alumina/zirconia ceramics were successfully used in total hip/knee arthroplasty in the last decades as alternative to metal devices.

For dental application: root canal posts, orthodontic brackets, implant abutments and all- ceramic restaurations.

Page 5: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Al2O3/ ZrO2 have been considered as bioinertceramics since they cannot induce apatite formation in SBF. They do however support bone cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation.

A. Gonzalez, 2010, Osteoblasts on bioceramic, Copyright Univ. of

Aberdeen

Page 6: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Materials characterization by SEM, XRD, FTIR, mechanical tests

Effect of CeO2 addition on densification and microstructure of Al2O3–YSZ composites, I. Akin, E. Yilmaz, F. Sahin, O.Yucel, G.Goller, Ceramics International 37 (2011) 3273–3280.

Correlation between structural properties and in vivo biocompatibility of alumina/zirconia bioceramics, S. Cavalu & all, Key Eng. Mater. 493-494 (2012) 1-6.

XRD and FTIR investigation of zirconia-taughenedalumina composites, V. Simon, S. Cavalu, I. Akin, O. Yucel, G. Goller, Studia UBB Physica, LVI, 1(2011)67-72.

Page 7: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

SEM details of Al2O3 and Al2O3-YSZ composites (G. Göller & all, Istanbul Technical University)

Page 8: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Granules with irregular shape - small animal model protocol

Page 9: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Small animal model: Wistar rat

Collagen film

Page 10: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Collagen membrane

• S. Cavalu & all, In vitro study of collagen coating by electrodeposition on acrylic bone cement, Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct (2011 ) 1, 89-97.• S. Cavalu & all, Bioactivity and antimicrobial properties of PMMA/Ag2O bone cement collagen coated, Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct (2011 ) 2, 779-790.• S. Cavalu & all, Improving the bioactivity and biocompatibility of acrylic bone cement by collagen coating, Key Eng. Mater (2012) 493-494, 391-396.

Page 11: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Monitoring the osseointegration process at different time intervals (3, 6 weeks). Radiographic images

Post surgery fracture failure may occur

Page 12: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

SEM images of the sheared implant surfaces

3 weeks after surgery

Ca/P= 1.60

Page 13: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

6 weeks after surgery

Haversian canal detailsCa/P= 1.80

Page 14: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Histological images to detect any immunological or inflammatory responses

osteoblasts

A network of woven bony trabecular architecture with cellular infiltration was observed (H&E stain)

Bone marrow cells

Page 15: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

SEM and Histological analysis revealed:

Fibrinous and collagenous matrix with three-dimensional interconnected porous structure after first 3 weeks.

Distinct gaps between the implant and the bone were observed in a few locations.

After 6 weeks, the matrix around the surface implanted area appeared more densely, well covered and integrated into a mixture of mineralized tissue, osteoidand dense matrix.

From the EDAX spectra, calcium/phosphate ratio is an indicative of the surface implant coverage for a successful osseointegration, varying from 1.7 (after 3 weeks) to 1.8 (after 6 weeks).

No clinical signs of inflammation or mobility were present. Newly

formed bone surrounded the implant surfaces, and many osteoblasts secreting osteoid matrix were observed.

Page 16: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Rabbit model The most commonly used model for medical research

(aprox. 35% of the musculoskeletal research studies –Al.Pearce, Eur Cells Mater 13 ,2007).

Histologically, rabbit long bones have a very differentmicrostructure from humans.

In comparison with other species, the rabbit has fasterskeletal change and bone turnover (significantintracortical, Haversian remodelling). This make itdifficult to extrapolate results from studies performed inrabbits onto the likely human clinical response.

Page 17: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Machined alumina/zirconia ceramics -cylindrical shape, suitable for rabbit model

Biomedical coatings

Alumina/zirconia ceramics are bioinert materials: once placed in the natural tissue, it has a minimal interaction with the surrounding tissue, generally a fibrous capsule might form around the implants.

Surface properties control the amount and quality of cells adhered on the implant and consequently, the tissue growth. Surface treatment techniques: sandblasting, acid-etched, organic (protein) or inorganic (Ca/P) coating.

Page 18: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Protein (fibrinogen) coating on alumina/zirconia ceramics

Page 19: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Rabbit model: surgical procedure

Page 20: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Radiographic images at 6 weeks

Page 21: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Histology: implant- bone marrow cells interaction

Page 22: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Histology: implant- host bone interaction

Goldner’s Trichrome stain

Page 23: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

SEM/EDX bone-implant interface

Ca/P= 1.62

Ca/P= 1.77

Page 24: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Histological and SEM observations The presence of young, compact lamellar bone and

osteocytes near the implant surface indicated goodbiocompatibility, and certainly the presence of theimplant did not disturb the processes of bone formationat the interface.

Slight vascular congestion in contact with the bonemarrow, but no giant cells

Microstructure details (including Haversian canals) ofbone and bone marrow tissue and elemental compositionat the interface indicated Ca/P =1.62 - 1.77

Page 25: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Conclusions No animal species fulfils all of the requirements of an ideal

model, but an understanding of the differences in bonearchitecture and remodeling may assist in the selection of asuitable model for a defined research question.

Organic (proteic) film as surface conditioning might be analternative approach to induce the bioactivity and improvethe biocompatibility of dense bioceramics designed to

load bearing bone replacement (hip joint, dental abutments)and to optimize the biological response for specificapplications of biomedical implants.

Page 26: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

The team:* Prof. dr. Viorica Simon and dr. Oana PontaBabes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics & Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Bio-Nano-Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

*Prof. dr. Gultekin Goller and assist. prof. Ipek Akin, Istanbul Technical University, Materials Science Department.

*Assist. prof. Cristian Ratiu , assist dr. Silviu Vlad and dr. Ioan Oswald University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutics, Oradea, Romania.

Romania-Turkey Bilateral Cooperation 2011-2012 and CNCS-UEFISCDI project PNII-ID-PCE 2011-3-0441 contract nr. 237/2011 .

Page 27: Simona Cavalu_Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials

Wild rabbit in red wine sauce