9
Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way. 以以以以以

Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology

Chengyuan LiRichard de GrijsLicai Deng

Science lead the way.以化成天下。

Page 2: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Multiple stellar populations in Magellanic Cloud clusters, an ordinary feature for intermediate age globulars in the LMC?

--- Milone et al.2009

~300 Myr age spread

Page 3: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Multiple stellar populations in Magellanic Cloud clusters, an ordinary feature for intermediate age globulars in the LMC?

--- Milone et al.2009

NGC 1868: 320 Myr age spreadLi et al. 2014

Page 4: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

How to detect multiple stellar populations in Galactic Globular Clusters?

• Multiple or Broadened• Main Sequence(s),• Sub-giant branch(es), • Red-giant branch(es) • Horizontal-branch(es)

Omega-Centauri: Villanova et al.2007

Page 5: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Extended Main-Sequence Turn-Off should link to a broadened Sub-giant-branch, but where is it?

NGC 1651: Li et al. 2014, Nature, accepted

Page 6: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Extended Main-Sequence Turn-Off should link to a broadened Sub-giant-branch, but where is it?

NGC 1651: Li et al. 2014, Nature, accepted

Age spread: 450 Myr (eMSTO), SSP (SGB)

Page 7: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Is this feature unique for NGC 1651?

NGC 2155SL 674Piatta et al. 2014

Page 8: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Multiple stellar populations in Magellanic Cloud clusters, an ordinary feature for intermediate age globulars in the LMC?

--- Milone et al.2009Single stellar population suggested by tight sub-giant-branch,

an ordinary feature for intermediate age globulars in the LMC? --- Li et al.2014

Questions: Why sub-giant-branch is ideal?1, It direct link to turn-off region.2, It easy to learn, do not experience significant mass loss.3, It ideally get rid of the effect from fast rotating.

Narrow sub-giant-branch ideal single stellar population

Why there is no one found this feature for a long time? (set by Luis)1, Not every clusters show clear sub-giant-branch.2, Bias.3, People already began action (Nate Bastian group, 2014, prepare to submit)

Page 9: Significant age range in massive star cluster excluded by tight sub-giant-branch morphology Chengyuan Li Richard de Grijs Licai Deng Science lead the way

Science lead the way.以化成天下。

The Significance: 1, Single stellar population still hold for intermediate-age star clusters.2, No additional physics is needed to prevent gas from collapsing into star forming.3, No need for us to expect a tremendous massive origin.4, Stellar rotating seems important for intermediate-age star clusters.

Thanks!