Upload
vanessa-underwood
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan
CITY OF HIGHPOINT
Sounding Board MeetingService Recommendations
September 9, 2014
Agenda• Welcome and Introductions• Recap of May Workshop
– Goals and Objectives– Comments and Emerging Themes
• Fixed-Route Service Recommendations– Service Planning Process– Fixed-Route Service Recommendations– Group Exercise – Discuss Recommendations/Mark up
Future System Map
• Demand-Responsive Service Recommendations– Overview of Demand-Responsive Service and Policies– Demand-Responsive Service Recommendations
• Bus Stop Recommendations• Group Discussion• Adjourn
Project Schedule Update
Part
Project Tasks Status
1 Existing Conditions Assessment
2Future Scenario Development and RecommendationsNext Steps:
• Revise service recommendations based on comments received
• Conduct public information workshop for community
• Finalize Short-Range Transit Plan
Goals and Objectives
• Meet and exceed customer expectations for transit service quality and delivery
• Offer a transit service that better corresponds with working hours
• Provide a safe transit service to community
• Align investments to meet existing and future demand
• Improved transit service reliability
Comments and Themes
• Strong desire for NC 68 service to Palladium District/Deep River
• Interest in service to Skeet Club• Improved service frequencies
along key routes• Extended service span for entire
system– Student populations– Shift workers
Comments and Themes
• Maximize connection opportunities for efficient use of resources
• Improved coordination with PART and GTA services
• Consolidate stops (where available)
• Consider opportunities to close gaps in system
• Service northwest of downtown? (Westchester/Lexington)
Transit Planning Fundamentals
• Focus on the customer• Keep service simple• Provide door to door service• Avoid internal competition between routes• Maximize opportunities to connect with
other services• Understand realities
– Funding and resource availabilities
• Tradeoffs– Coverage vs. Frequency
Key Assumptions
• Neutral Funding Scenario– No additional funding over the life
of the SRTP
• The radial, “pulse”-based operating structure would remain
• The Broad Avenue Terminal would continue to serve as the operations center– No capital improvements
Operations Planning Focus• Focus on reducing duplicative service• Reduce the size of end-of-line loops and
deviations• Improve connection opportunities between routes• Maximize spacing between routes to keep service
area coverage while improving service frequency• Connect housing locations with activity centers
and key city destinations• Provide service to populations most in need• Use fixed route service as opposed to demand-
responsive
New Features
• Maintain pulse-based system• Creation of trunk routes and transit spines– Trunk routes: improve service frequency and
span– Transit spines: improve north/south, east/west
connections, service reliability– Key transit corridors: North/South Main, North
Centennial– Passenger advantage: more frequency, faster
service– Operating cost nominal (fleet is the issue)
Summary of Recommendations
• Anticipated 8.1% increase of in-service revenue hours and miles
• Total number of trips for most local routes decreased– Tradeoff for providing enhanced service on Main Street and
along all routes during peak periods– Extending service to Palladium/Deep River region (Route 13)
• Sufficient fleet available to satisfy the operating characteristics
• Major Service Change Recommendations– Eliminate routes 12, 15, 21
• Re-invest savings into current and new services
– Routes 10 and 11: Designate as trunk routes, creating Main Street transit spine
– Route 17: Designate as crosstown route
Exercise
• As a group, discuss the recommendations• Use handout to write
comments• Use future systems map
to mark your ideas or make comments
Summary of Service
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)– Hi-Tran Required to provide ADA-compliant
paratransit services for persons with disabilities unable to use general public transit services
– Hi-Tran required to offer paratransit services for eligible individuals who begin and end their trip within ¾-mile of a fixed-route during the operating hours of the route
• Provides a necessary and valuable mobility option to the community
• Service comes at a significant operating cost– Expanding coverage area will influence demand-
responsive service area
Summary of Service
• Advanced reservation, origin/destination service– Providing curb-to-curb transportation for eligible
residents• Age 60 and above• Persons with disabilities
• Schedule: 8:00am and 5:00pm Monday through Saturday
• Ride requests may be made up to two weeks in advance of travel
• Fare: $2.00 (ADA-maximum 2x base cash fare for fixed-route service)
Service Recommendations
• Modify service eligibility requirements, particularly the passenger age requirement
• Institute a transit travel training program for seniors and persons with disabilities
• Establish a Community Service route to consolidate trips to common locations
• Consider a free fare policy on fixed-route services for qualified demand-responsive participants
Service Recommendations
• Create a bus stop improvement program for improved bus stop accessibility
• Consider a functional assessment test as part of demand eligibility determination
• Establish a supplemental service agreement with area taxi providers
• Shorten pre-scheduled trip booking period
Bus Stops and Amenities
• Bus stops are the “Front Door” of the transit system
• Tradeoff – Speed versus Access–More stops means more access, but slower travel
times; fewer stops means less access but faster travel times
– Are there too many bus stops along portions of a street?
• Depending on infrastructure, bus stops can range in price from $1,000 to $10,000
• Supportive pedestrian infrastructure leading to the stop
• ADA requirements
Initial Recommendations
• Conduct full bus stop inventory– Review warrants for bus stop sizing, spacing, design
standards
• Consider consolidation of stops• Increases ridership with faster service• Fewer stops result in easier to understand route maps• Lowers operating and capital costs
• Collect updated data on boardings by location– Prioritize bus shelter and other investments based
on boardings
• Consider capital infrastructure improvement fund– Sidewalks, lighting, furniture