Sherter Lies - 1st rough Draft

7/27/2019 Sherter Lies - 1st rough Draft

1/12

"It is at least as impo

involve a judgment prov

a parent's future inv

assets, or

"The mission of our justice syThe true message of Elkins is that, to do

critical manner to identify what works

A

Califor

As of

attorney

and coun

professio

and coop

and confli

In 2010 in a TMZ article on Jer

..the TMZ article is a selective rep

outcomes of the case and should n

reflecting only one snapshot of a

nastiness that may overcome any li

Jermaine Jackson Slams TMZ Dea

On Friday, TMZback child supportuntil he antes up arTMZs web articlenever gets it right,

care of my kids an

Jacksons family law attorney, Jeff Shave his drivers license, he is a comschool and food, his ex-wife is movin

streets, and the TMZ article is a selefinal outcomes of the case and shoupapers reflecting only one snapshot

nastiness that may overcome any liti

Attorney Sherters insight on howand inaccurate portrayals that aimpartial view is a concise and exaintentionally misrepresents facts.of choice even though it clearly vioserve to elevate ethical concerns reg

Uncons

An attorney should not engage

of the court. For example, in com

intelligence, integrity, ethics, mora

when those characteristics are n

humiliating words. (Guid

I contend that there are m

tant that courts employ fair proceedings when th

ding for custodyin the best interest of a childand

lvement in his or her child's life, dividing all of a f

etermining levels of spousal and child support

tem is to provide timely access to fair andso, the participants in the justice system must evalu

well andwhere the system is falling short."ELKI

torney Jeff Sherter

ia Attorney Guidelines of Civility and

icers of the court with responsibilities to the

have an obligation to be professional wit

sel, the courts and the public. This obli

al integrity, personal dignity, candor, dili

ration, all of which are essential to the fair

ct resolution.-

aine Jackson respondents attorney Jeff Shert

ort ofpleadings that misrepresent the proce

t be considered or evaluated in the context

one-sided and inaccurate portrayal that

tigation.

dbeat Dad Claim - By : Nima - December 5,

released an article stating that Jermaine Jacksis driver's license has been confiscated, and he'und $100,000".Jermaine Jackson slammed bac

s characterization of him as a deadbeat dad todthe media always pulls this kind of stuff when

my family.

erter, Esq., stated in response to the TMZ a

itted and devoted father, pays for his children'sfrom the Mansion to be put up in an upscale c

tive report ofpleadings that misrepresent thed not be considered or evaluated in the contexf a one-sided and inaccurate portrayal that is

ation. - http://www.dubcnn.com/news/news-archiv

moving and prejudicial the nature ofpresee part and parcel of nastinessin its abilitt understanding of the moving power of an his appears to be Jeff Sherter's highly pollates the ethical guidelines established by tharding the professional conduct of this attorney.

ionable Attorney Behavior

in conduct that is unbecoming a member of

unications with adversaries an attorney sh

s or behavior of the court or other counsel,

t at issue. f.) An attorney should avoid

elines, supra, 4, pp. 4-5.)

ltiple fraudulent violations and this

stakes

governing

mily's

onsistent justice.te it in a thoughtful and

S COMMISSION- 2010

Professionalism

dministration of justic

h clients, other partie

ation includes civility

gence, respect, courtesy

dministration of justic

er was quoted stating:

edings, facts and final

f isolated court papers

s part and parcel of

010

on "owes so much in's not getting it backk from Europe aty and stated: "TMZIm away, and I take

ticle: Jermaine doesexpensive private

ondo and not to the

roceedings, facts andof isolated court

part and parcel of

-12-2010

tations of one sidedto pollute a persons

attorney whoished legal strategybar, and should only-IMO-HE IS A LIAR.

the Bar and an officer

uld not disparage the

arties or participants

ostile, demeaning or

ase must be reset


2/12




assets, or



A man at

Another

So the firs

"HELL N

Justice King's remarks in In re

relationship between the perce

produces the child support orde

be complied with, but it would

ongoing conflict between t







bar stands and proclaims: "All Lawyers

an at the front of the bar replies: "Hey! I

man asks, "Why, are you a lawyer?"

!.... I'm an asshole "

eff Sherter ..." you are both.."

nd a fucking liar too....

Marriage of Fini, supra, 26 Cal.App.4th 103

tion of fairness and the legitimacy of the j

: "This would not only make it more likel

liminate the amount ordered for child su

e parents, the fallout ...... is clearly harm

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

are ASSHOLES!

resent that!"

3, emphasizes the

stice system which

that the order will

pport as a source of

ul to the child."


3/12




assets, or



" This case appears to have follo

disappearing into a judge's cham

hearing or settlement. ...child sup

and reasonable process, not an a

Elkins Commission

Eighty percent of family law c

time of disposition. (Task ForceIn "The Final Recommendations"

process.These are the ideas that msystem that deserves the trust and

1. Courts will ensure consistefamilies, and children in fa

2. Statutes, rules, procedures,

process rights of parties asunderstandability. Simplificatrecommendations will be evaleffective and timely access.

5. The task force is aware of thfamily law. The task force isfamilies, children, and socie

7. Enhancing the status of, and

"Public confidence is essentialto

trust, and the procedures they em

subjected to second-class status oentitled to resolve their disputes in t

evidence established by statute."

Cal. Atty. Guidelines of Civility &

seek to reduce emotional tension a

cooperative atmosphere, and keep

These guidelines reflect that attorncounsel, [and] the courts, which o

and cooperation, all of which are e

resolution. (Guidelines, supra, Intro

These attacks by Sherter are designed

environment and protect and his chil

manipulate the court with while clai

misdirection of material facts are key

to destroy the lives of the children th

tant that courtsemploy fair proceedings when th






ed the all-too-common pattern in family l

er and emerging with the judge's order, i

ort ordersmust be seen by each parent as

bitrary decision done in a corner.

ses have at least one unrepresented p

on Self-Represented Litigants, supra note 9, at 2

the Task Force designed to increase efficiencnifest, in the view of the Task Force, a fair, j

confidence of those who use it.

t and timely access to equal justice for alily law proceedings.

and practices will protect procedural fair

ell as seek to increase efficiency, effectiveneion must not diminish due process rights.uated for their potential impact on due pro

unique opportunity to make far-reaching, pindful of the long-term impact of family

ty. - IT HAS FAILED !!

espect for, family law litigants and the fa

the viability of the legal process; courts m

ploy must deserve it. [F]amily law litigant

r deprived of access to justice. Litigants withe usual adversary trial proceeding governed

rofessionalism 19- In family law proceeding

d trauma and encourage the parties and att

he best interest of the children in mind']."

eys have an obligation to be professional witligation includes civility, professional integ

sential to the fair administration of justice a

duction, p. 3.)

to attack a loving father in court attempting to

ren from all abuses and provoke a response tha

ing the victimization of the abusive abandonin

as intended to lead the court to an unjust decisi

subject to the proceeding.

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

w of lawyers

dependent of any

the result of a fair

rty by the

.

and ensure duest, and effective

individuals,

ness and the due

ss, consistency, andask forceess, fairness, and

sitive changes inaw on individuals,

ily law process.

st earn the public's

should not be

other civil claims are

by the rules of

s an attorney should

rneys to interact in a

. . . other parties and

rity, . . . candor . . .

d conflict

rovide a stable

he can point to and

g parent. His obvious

n that can only serve


4/12




assets, or



C

SECTION 4 -An attorneys co

civility, professional integrity, per

should not engage in conduct th

court."g. An attorney should not cre

opposing counsel a positi

Jeff Sherter is a n

1/26/2012

Pg. 22

This is not the discussion I was inbilled $1400 or 2x the support I woreason.

Because my attorney sa

"MIS

Not even close to the same story....

his "Candor" there and failed to ment

Sept 2nd paystub she received 4 days

tant that courtsemploy fair proceedings when th






NDUCT FOUL - Jeff Sherter

mmunications about the legal system should

onal dignity, and respect for the legal syste

t is unbecoming a member of the Bar an

ate a false or misleading record of eventsn not taken.

t a Ethical Lawyer... he is an Unethical "Lie

formed about after being left in the hallway ofld actually receive during another the continua

ys.. this happened "in chambers".....

ING CRITICAL INFORMATION" for

What CONFERENCE did Shitner attend ??

ion the revelation of the $4050 /mo his client a

before she committed perjury and claimed $230

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

at all times reflect

. .."...An attorney

an officer of the

r attribute to an

-yer"

Lost Rights" thennce....for absolutely no

HILD SUPPORT

e seems to have left

tually made on her

0/mo. .


5/12




assets, or



What critical information was mi

The" In Contempt" non-supporting

and +40K income and a $7K tax be







ssing ??

non custodial parent who's 2009 taxes showe

nefit for the kids

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

head of household ,


6/12




assets, or



Her taxes two years earlier don't

Once again the evil of the "Cham

Yes.... ASSHOLE... I DID....

In Fact "Cameron Astiazaran" tol







reflect

bers Conference" raises its head ... as the tru

me this ....

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

th is raped again.


7/12




assets, or



1) The Profit and Loss was in tSherter shared on Novemb

2)







e court record however what was missing was

r 9th

that proved that on Sept 2nd her YTD wa

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

the Sept 2nd paystub

$32,200


8/12




assets, or



3) **correction ** THE PET4) This Discovery claim is B

in the record

On that note...who the F do think y

Guidelines Section 4: ".....an attornSee Fam. C. 2100 (b), 271(a) (s

Linguistics expert Dr. Michaelphrase is Champing at the bitof the mouth that produces sou

Champing in swine may be a

mating.Definition from Hurnik

I dont speak swine however whlanguage of BULLSHIT. This is a "

"champing" bullshit in his flagranof lies told in his "inaccurate portr

this litigation"

Some courts have said the section aut

(Robert J. v. Catherine D. (2009) 171 Cal.

The fact that my children are losi

respected Jeff Sherter if he was vig

his legal expertise and the results

The court is confused because it vi

undue weight to the words that co

norm instead of being dangerously

their home is because lawyers lie...

Jeff Sherter is a Lie-yer ... The

This asshole - a'la cart sent absolu

She served "Gracie Peters" at my fo

for the last 7yrs.. in a way that alwa

that continuances due to his lying c

Because I have never been in cha

what Shetner says or what he and

was a breach of fiduciary duty. Iw

Specifically . Starting at Pg 2







ITIONER: THERE HAS NOT !!!

LLSHIT, Sherter served absolutely NOTHI

ou are talking to... ??

y should avoid, hostile, demeaning or humilinctions for uncooperative conduct in family

Porter states: Chomping at the bit is in fact i. To champ is to do a repetitious, powerfunds when the teeth hit together.

threat signal, but also is performed by boars

t al., 1995.

at is crystal clear is attorney JeffShitteris qucourt of truth"... and the truth is the one cham

misrepresentations of the proceedings and fayal of facts that is part and parcel of the na

orizes attorneys fees and costs as a penalty for

pp.4th 1500, 1520; In re Marriage of Freeman, supr

ng their home isn't the reason he is an "assh

rously protecting the legal interest of his cli

ere because she was such a good liar that sh

lated my "right to be heard" and because Ju

e from the mouths of attorneys... as if a "eth

close to being an oxymoron. The reason m

REGULARLY

/L was in the IN the Court Record and in

ely nothing... his ignorant, lying, deceitful cli

rmer attorney's office the way she does ever

ys creates extra work, drama and problems.

lient used up $4700 and received only $1047

bers and both attorneys are documented li

y ex-attorney conspired to in chambers. I h

ll never trust another attorney to go to ch

0 - Transcripts

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

G, and the P& L is

ting words"law cases);

correct...the correct

opening and closing

during courtship and

ite fluent in the

ping is the one

cts through a seriestiness that overcame

bstreperous conduct.

a, 132 Cal.App.4th at p. 6.)

le". I would have

nt with the depth of

confused the court.

icial officers give

ical attorney" was the

children have lost

fact he had seen it

nt-in-contempt DID ...

thing else in her life

The former attorney

in the previous 7mo.

rs I no longer care

d no part of it and it

mbers again


9/12




assets, or



To clarify: This is a lie. Novembe

and (according to my attorney) C

only $95 support checks and no

Mr. Sherter in his part-time role as at

1) He didnt have a profit and lrecord. I have brought bank swithin the 3 mo. window in Jhe reviewed the P/L that does

2) We sent discovery who iknowledge ? Is Mr Sherter recompliance failure. Mr. Shertaccusations presented as facts







2011 appearance was continued because D

mmissioner Veasey simply refused to ad

xplanation. -HOW SHOULD I SUPP

orney states the following lies.

ossyet it is in the court record. We had no i

tatements and credit card since September 6

th

anuary. We had no information is what he tells tnt make sense ? no critical information miss

s we ? I have never been served discovery. is tsponsible for the negligence since testifying forr has wasted court time with poor case manageare unprofessional and untrue.

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

SS failed to respond

ress I was getting

RT MY KIDS ?

formation but it was in

d the P&L was stillhe court yet he claimsing

his personal

we to facts about myment and irresponsible


10/12




assets, or



My EX-LAWYER RESPONDED

Mr Sherters We sent discoveryfailed his duty to follow up on his liinsults.

1) Gracie Peters and her Attorneysbeing used as a tactic to delay thdiscovery requirements and loosseeks to find the imaginary trustI dont have to pay rent because







ND the complaining WE DID HER US

ocuments to someone I dont know to the attorited scope duty before making wide scope accu

ere served in my case to a lawyer I dont havelegal process. Its cumbersome and being useaccess to attorney fees. It has no substantive v

that Dianne believes makes money out of thin amy trust pays it.

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

UAL NOTHING

ney I dont have andsations, claims, and

. This discovery isto see if I will fail the

alue and I suspect itir. I have been told that


11/12




assets, or



. I had expected her to be punished foany care... not me for being the respo







r being in contempt and not paying anything fonsible parent, providing for all needs and in co

stakes

governing

mily's


S COMMISSION- 2010

months, nor providingpliance.


12/12




assets, or







stakes

governing

mily's


Documents

Sherter Lies - 1st rough Draft