SHARP TURNING-POINT!ARMENIAN

MYTHOMANIA AND THE TRUTH

DOCUMENTATION

© Erich Feiglprof.erich.feigl@chello.at

www.monarchie.at

“He, who controls the present, controls the past.He, who controls the past, holds the future.”

George Orwell, “1984”

The mythomania is a mental disease characterized with pathologicaladdiction to mendacity. Taking into consideration the calumny and the nine-ty years-old legend, which have been spread over for more than a centurynow, about genocide supposedly perpetrated by the Turkish against theArmenian people, it’s the very time to oppose that backbiting vigorously onthe ground of incontrovertible documents and visual materials.

There is a document where they endorse their being a belligerent nation.

“Mr. Minister,I have the honour, in the

name of the Armenian NationalDelegation, of submitting toYour Excellency the followingdeclaration, at the same timereminding you:

That the Armenians havebeen, since the beginning of thewar, de facto belligerents, asyou yourself have acknowl-edged, since they have foughtalongside the Allies on allfronts, enduring heavy sacrificesand great suffering for the sakeof their unshakeable attachmentto the cause of the Entente:

In France, through their vol-unteers, who started joining theForeign Legion in the first daysand covered themselves withglory under the French flag:

In Palestine and Syria, wherethe Armenian volunteers, rec-ruited by the National Delega-tion at the request of thegovernment of the Republic,formed the majority of theFrench contingent and playedan important role in the victoryof General Allenby, as he him-self and his French Chiefs haveofficially declared;

In the Caucasus, where, without including of 150.000 Armenians in the structure of theImperial Russian Army, more than 40.000 of their volunteers contributed to the libera-tion of a portion of the Armenian vilayets, and where, under the command of their lead-ers, Antranik and Nazarbekov, only they among the peoples of the Caucasus resisted tothe Turkish armies, from the beginning of the Bolshevist withdrawal right up to the sign-ing of an armistice.”

His Excellency Mr. S. PishonThe Minister of Foreign AffairsDear Minister, let me renew my assurances of highest respect to you,Bogosh Nubar,The Chairman.

Armenian fanatics have already been terrorizing the world for about acentury and a half. That started in the Ottoman Empire where Protestantand Gregorian troublemakers and members of numerous Armenian politicalorganizations (Dashnaks, Hnchakists...) committed outrages and misled theworld community. For fear of the Armenian terror very few people dared totell the truth and this situation is still going on. Mark Sykes, who had writ-ten the masterpiece “DAR UL ISLAM”, became the discoverer of Armenianmachinations at that time; so did “LE PETIT JOURNAL” magazine, whichalso once dared to highlight the actual situation.

3

With the beginning of the war in 1914, affairs took a dramatic turn.Armenians of the Ottoman Empire aspired purposefully to committing sabo-tage at the Turkish rear. Strong alliances of the Armenian volunteers formedin France, Russia and some other countries had set out against Turkey,involved in the War of Five Fronts by that time; the “belligerent de factonation” had engaged in an insidious and cruel struggle against its own land,where it had nothing but the benefits for about thousand years. The aforecited document, the letter (1918) of Bogosh Nubar, then leader ofArmenians, to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Paris, is an incontrovertibleevidence of the true situation. They fought a war!

4

The attached photo (spring 1915)displays the Armenian insurgentsarmed with artillery, provided by theRussians, opening the second frontbehind the Ottoman lines to simplifythe seizure of Van by the Russians.

The “Underwood & Underwood” was the most significant press agency inthe USA in its time; its photographs used to spread all over the world beingconsidered absolutely reliable sources. The Armenian rebellion began inFebruary/March, 1915. Many photographs appearing in American andBritish press portrayed the truth about the attack on Van behind the Ottomanlines and demonstrations of alliances of Armenian volunteers under themotto: “READY TO EXACT VENGEANCE: THE ARMENIAN CON-TINGENT IN THE CAUCASUS”. The question is: “Vengeance for what?”Is it really for that the Ottoman Armenians filled the most important statepositions, that they had the whole construction and financial business in theirhands, as well as economic import, or that they had religious freedom, mana-ged the most expensive schools and enjoyed numerous privileges?

5

The picture displays the detachmentof volunteers-hnchakists (“YoungArmenia”, July 20, 1915).

The monument in Sev`s not far from Van. 6000 of Muslim victims,Turkish and Kurdish people, who were killed during the short period of vio-lent reign of the Armenian par-militarists, rest in the earth-pit behind theobelisk. One can hardly find a place in the whole of the Eastern Turkey with-out a memorial to defenceless people murdered by Armenians in that tragicspring of 1915.

6

“The Genocide Against Arme-nians Before the Court. The Trial ofTalat Pasha” is a typical impudentdeception out of instigators’ work-shop, deluding the reader: the pic-ture of Talat Рasha, murdered by theArmenian terrorist in Berlin, and aheap of skulls depicted on the cover-sheet automatically produce certainimpression about Armenian victimsof the events of 1915.

The deceit had undoubtedlyworked well, and that was a primarygoal. But in fact that picture is areproduction of “The Apotheosis ofWar” (The Tretyakov Gallery,Moscow) – a canvas by VasilyVereshaghin painted in 1871 (!!) inmemory of the war between Prussiaand France.

“The Forty Days of Musa Dagh”, a novel consisting of misrep-resentations and distorted facts solely, has started its triumphaltour around the world long ago and had formed the portrait of“Vile Turks”. But it isn’t a fault of the great Austrian poet FranzWerfel (the author of the novel): he is just a victim of the Armenianband of swindlers and frauds, which had palmed off false docu-ments upon him.

The backstage leaders of this still working world-scale deceptionwere: Aram Andonian who crammed the whole book with ficti-tious orders to kill, supposedly issued by the Young Turks; cunningfalsifier pastor Yohannes Lepsius whose machinations have beenonly recently discovered; after that, there is also a book byMorgenthau, the former US ambassador, who was surroundedexclusively by Armenian trustworthy proxies and colleagues andblindly trusted their speculations – we hope blindly, otherwise, hewould have been one of the main initiators of the Armenian terror.

Splendid as it is, though Werfеl’s novel has nothing to do withthe reality!

“A true and thrilling novel”? “Thrilling” – yes, but not “true”!

7

Today the “40 Days” is sold from the hawkers’ stand in the USA and English-speaking space as sex&crime fiction and everywhere finds its reader who hardlyknows that the most important passages of the book, which clearly reflect Werfel’sblunders, referring to the rebellion in Van for instance, are quietly obliterated, whathad also happened to the French edition. New editions of the book are beingmanipulated. And mafia standing behind it perfectly knows why.

It is not so difficult to correct the mistakes on the cover of the book,designed for external effect:

1. The Musa Dagh is not a volcanic formation: it is rather a harmless, slop-ing mountainous landscape. Nobody lashed settlers neither at this place, noranywhere else in the Ottoman Empire. The Turkish legislation severelypunished such deeds. The story about sheets, supposedly used by rebels forcommunication of SOS signal from the shore, is ridiculous as well (“Christiansin Disaster”). Armoured cruiser and transport ships of the French fleet unitshad already cast off to deliver the precious freight to a safe place: because itwas the issue of thousands of potentially fanatic fighters for the Suez front!

2. The situation was the following further: the “heroes” of the Musa Daghundergone military training in the British and French camps in Cyprus andEgypt, came to Syria to fight for a short period, but soon the Entente stateshad withdrawn them as they grossly abused the power. The situation in theRussian front was the same, where the tsar’s command began to move awayfrom them gradually.

8

There are photographs of the campswhere the French and the British arrangedmilitary training for the “victims” of theMusa Dagh in order to engage them in thefront battles. These photographs have beenfound in the Museum of History (Museed’Histoire Contemporaine) in Paris,remaining out of sight of those Armenianforces, which systematically “cleared”“unpleasant” documents off the archives.

The attached is the photograph of the battleship “DESAIX”, the flagshipof the fleet cruising between Anatolia and Syria, the most vulnerable placesof the Ottoman Empire at that time. The mission of Armenians here was (asin Van) to crack the rear of the Turkish front in order to facilitate the attackof the Entente troops.

And the ships were nowise called by means of sheets, but by the most up-to-date radio equipment of that time.

9

After the end of the war theArmenian falsifiers started distor-tion of history anticipating GeorgeOrwell’s “1984”, where “Ministryof Truth” is described. A mani-pulation by Aram Andonian, whofabricated the “orders to kill”,which had never existed, was typi-cal for that period. But Sinasi Oreland Surreyya Yuca have managedto expose those falsifications intheir book “The Talat PashaTelegrams”. “Fake” – “Falsified”!.

One of the letters forged by Aram Andоnian and dated February 18, 1331(March 2, 1916) is cited here. The letter begins with the word “Bismillah”,being written so that no Muslim would ever scribe it in such a way. But themost fatal mistake made by Andonian was the date of the letter. Since he hadpoor knowledge of rules of recalculation of a year by Rumi calendar of theOttomans and did not know about removal of disparity of 13 days betweenRumi and Christian calendars (February 1917), he dated the letter withwrong year. He put 1331 instead of 1330 (1916), though the content of theletter was built so to “prove” the resettlement as planned beforehandaction… but the source still had altered date for full 9 (!) months.

10

There is another document“№537”, dated “October 12, 1915”. Inhis letter A.Andonian reports to Talat,the Minister of Internal Affairs: “Webecame aware that some people,including officials, marry Armeniangirls. We strictly forbid it and insis-tently recommend identification andexiling such people into the desert”.

And what about the true number of victims? There is an irrefutable docu-ment drawn up by Bogosh Nubar, the leader of the Armenian representationon refugee affairs in Paris then:

In this document is definitely pointed out that the number of victimsamong Armenian settlers was 300.000, while losses of Muslims during theperiod of the Civil War were estimated at 500.000 victims (Kurds, Turks andCharkaz`), simply forgotten, nobody speak or write about them just becausethey are only “useless Turks”, as one Armenian bishop had once said.

11

“Dear Minister,Since you have expressed

your desire, I’m honoured topresent you an approximatenumber of the Armenian set-tlers and refugees from Turkeystanding in need for urgent aid.

From them, approximately:

250.000 are in the Caucasus40.000 – in Persia80.000 – in Syria and Palestine20.000 – in Mosul and BaghdadTotal: 390.000

The total number of thedeported is estimated at 600-700.000 persons. The figureswhich I have written to youreflect the number of survivorscurrently residing at the newterritories occupied by theAlliance troops. The rest of the

deportees are scattered on deserted lands, so we have no detailed informationabout them.

Dear Minister, accept the assurances of my highest consideration and bestwishes.

Mr. GouvMinister PlenipotentiaryThe Ministry of Foreign Affairs”The letter was sent by Bogosh Nubar, the Representative of Armenians in

France, to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (Archives of the Ministry of ForeignAffairs of France, Middle East section, “Armenia”, vol. 2, p. 47)

FactsJustin McCarthy, one of the best demographers in the world, professor of the

Louisville University (USA), has issued an undeniable edition “Muslims andMinorities – The Population of Ottoman Anatolia and the End of the Empire” andthen described the results of his research in a table. The question of WHERE andHOW Armenian fanatics and their Protestant instigators from the USA wantedto establish a Protestant Armenian State immediately falls off itself.

12

The attached is the map of the Ottoman Empire reflecting percentage of

the population of Anatolia based on confessional ground. There was no divi-

sion into “nationalities” or even “races” in the Ottoman Empire.

EuropeIstanbulEdirneSelanikYanyaManastir Iskodra*Kosova*Cezair

Western AnatoliaHudavendigarAydinIzmitBiga

Northern AnatoliaKastamonuTrabzon

Central AnatoliaSivasAnkaraKonya

Southern AnatoliaАdanaHaleb

162 13233 650 870900140

97 61625 05969 2252 805

13 70268 326

182 912125 61624 856

74 930123 129

1 032 8391 426 6321 347 915560 8351 064 789 349 4551 602 949359 474

1 919 7892 194 419389 490183 077

1 350 3901 505 490

1 472 8381 444 1391 690 388

666 5781 189 678

8,82,4******

5,11,117,81,5

1,04,5

12,48,71,5

11,210,3

Armenianpopulation

Total population

Armenianpercent

Armenianpopulation

Total population

Armenianpercent

Eastern AnatoliaBitlisМamuretulazizDiyarbakirVanErzurum

SyriaSuriyeBeyrutCebelilubnanKudsisherifZor

IraqМosul*BaghdadBasra*

ArabiaHijazYemen*

Empire

191 156111 04389 131130 500163 218

1 7684 01062 340283

10050050

00

1 698 301

611 391680 241754 451509 797974 196

1 017 322979 702235 169352 81383 120

850 0001 400 0001 200 000

2 500 0005 000 000

38 899 366

31,316,311,815,616,8

24*73

***

**

4,4

Table Two. Armenian Population of the Ottoman Empire, 1912

The Greeks and Armenians constituted the Christian population of theOttoman Empire mainly and that fact was certified on the map with graph-ic data (J. McCarthy reproduced it from “Armenians in the Late OttomanPeriod” by Tukay Ataov (Ankara, 2001)).

The map of Anatolia with being often met toponym “Six Vilayets” on it –six Ottoman administrative units (provinces) in the east of the Empire,unambiguously confirm that the idea of establishing a “Protestant”Armenian state was purely illusive, unless the expulsion of all the Muslimshad been planned beforehand. The same policy has been pursued on a dra-matic scale during the deportation of the Azerbaijanis out of their own landsin the west of the country nowadays.

The definition of “Six Vilayets”, as if mainly inhabited by Armenians, isone of the standard expressions invented by circles interested in disturbances,terror and war. Here J. McCarthy also reveals true circumstances. There is adeep delusion concerning the words “Armenia” and “Armenians”: Armeniais a great geographical definition just like America; the Brazilians, Maya,Eskimos are the same Americans as the USA citizens. The same applies toArmenia where including “Haik”s (as Armenians call themselves, and“Hayastan” is their republic situated in the east of Anatolia), Turkish,Kurdish, Georgians and other small ethnic groups reside.

Here is a classical example of manipulations concerning the population of"Six Vilayets": Armenian delegates reporting to the Entente Powers in Parisafter the World War One presented the "Armenian patriarchy`s statistics",where 1,018,000 of Haiks and 165,000 of other Christians opposed to1,432,000 - the aggregate number of Muslims, whereas 666,000 were Turkish,the remaining part consisted of Charkaz, Laz, Kurdish nomads, Kurdish set-tlers and others. That turns all the "documentation" into sheer fraud as thecensus in the Ottoman Empire has never been based upon nationalities, butconfessional principle, as it was mentioned above.

13

According to the Ottoman statistics Armenians constituted 784,917 (19%),other Christians – 176,845 (4%) and Muslims – 3,173,918 (77%).

Table Five. Armenian Survivors

Total refugees 810 000Remaining in Turkey 70 000Total 880 000

* Austria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Switzerland, Italy,United Kingdom

+ Japan, China, India, Latin America.

(Source: McCarthy, Muslims and Minorities)

TODAY THE SMOKE-SCREEN OF “1915” CONCEALS ARMENIANS’ CAMPAIGN AGAINST TURKEY AND

AZERBAIJAN ALONG WITH ARMENIANS’ AGGRESSIVEWAR OF 1989 AND ITS TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES

Azerbaijani territories occupied by Armenians

Nagorno Karabakh region

14

Surviving ArmenianMigrants To

Number Surviving ArmenianMigrants To

Number

USSR 400000 Сурийа 100000

Greece 45000 Lebanon 50000

France 30000 Iraq 25000

Bulgaria 20000 Palestine/Jordan 10000

Cyprus 2500 Egypt 40000

Other European Countries* 2000 Iran 50000

North America 35380 Other+ 1000

Area 4 388 (square kilometers)Population (1989) 189 085Armenians 145 450 (76,9%)Azerbaijanis 40 688 (21,5%)Russians 1 922 (1%)Others 1 025 (0,6%)

Shusha region

15

Area 289 (sq. km)Population (1989) 20 579Azerbaijanis 19 036 (92,5%)Armenians 1 377 (6,7%)Occupied May 8, 1992

Killed- 20 000 Injured - 50 000 Missed - 4 866

Regions outside Nagorno Karabakh

Regions Date of occupation PopulationLachin May 18, 1992 71 000Kalbajar April 2, 1993 74 000Aghdam July 23, 1993 165 600Fizuli August 23, 1993 146 000Jabrail August 26, 1993 66 000Gubadly August 31, 1993 37 900Zangilan October 28, 1993 39 500

Victims of Armenian aggression

Destructions and losses

Total losses estimated at 60 billion of USA dollars

Appearance of disfigured monuments of the Azerbaijani poets and com-posers is terrifying; they were discovered during the counter-attack opera-tions. The faces on monuments are knocked out, as if the soldiery wanted towipe off everything that represented the true face of the occupied areas.

16

SettlementsHouses Public buildings SchoolsKindergartensHospitals, sanitary centerLibrariesGod’s temples (different religions)MosquesHistorical placesHistorical monuments and museumsMuseum exhibitsIndustrial and agricultural enterprisesRoads BridgesWater pipelinesGas pipelinesElectric power linesForestsSowing areaWater-supply systems

890150 0007 000693855695927449946440 0006 000800 кm.1602 300 кm2 000 кm.15 000 кm.280 000 1 000 000 hа1 200 кm

Demolition of the Azerbaijanitown of Khojaly had accompa-nied not only with expulsion ofpopulation, but the massacre ofinnocent people became world-wide known event deserving uni-versal contempt and comparablefor its brutality with the events ofHitler or Stalin era.

One century later Azerbaijan still commemorates thousands of victims ofArmenian attacks of 1905, when Armenians backboned by tsarist Russiamade first overt attempt to seize power in Baku and thus, to appropriateAzerbaijani oil. Those days’ photos witnessed the scales of the Armenianaggression, which finally frightened Russians and they stopped this mas-sacre.

Another photo depicts transportation of provision for occupants. An end-less row of the Armenian trucks stretches on the territory of Azerbaijandelivering arms and ammunition for occupation forces and new settlersexceeding in number on the illegally occupied territories.

17

These are typical pictures ofthe territories occupied byArmenians shot from satellite.The town of Gubadly situatedclose to Nakhichevan in the southof Azerbaijan is seen on the satel-lite photo. Massive militaryinstallations, tanks and militaryaerodrome are clearly seen. Themembers of the OSCE delega-tion, visited Karabakh and otheroccupied territories in March2005, witnessed the awful pictureof Azerbaijani villages, farm-steads and settlements completelydevastated by Armenians. This isa question of attempt to wipe offeverything of the Azerbaijani ori-gin and to cover, both in literaland figurative meaning of theword, traces of the aggressivewar.

There is also historical photo from Shusha, where Armenians raged in1905. That was the first culmination flash of aggression.

18

The events of 1905 were just a prelude of the attempt to seize Azerbaijanentirely. Photos taken after destructions committed by Armenians in Baku13 years later speak for themselves.

Everything repeated all over again in March 1918 on a "higher" level:the Armenian troops invaded Baku and stayed here as a new masters ofthe city. 20000 of Azerbaijanis were killed and local population waspurged away in the course of Armenian attacks.

There is a dramatic report about the events of 1918 in Azerbaijan preparedby count Trauttmansdorff, the member of the Austrian-Hungarian govern-ment in the Ottoman Empire (in the foreign vocabulary of that timeAzerbaijanis used to be called “Tatars”: the artificial definition introduced todiminish the nation, as Tatars considered to be low-graded nation in spite oftheir rich and distinctive culture and ability to repulse Russians for manycenturies).

19

The document extracted from Vienna State Archive runs:

20

“In March 21 the Bolshevikssent an ultimatum to Tatarsdemanding to give up all armstill 5 o’clock in the afternoonand recognize the SovietGovernment. Armenians behav-ed neutrally. They sent theirrepresentative to Tatars, whoclearly stated the unwillingnessof Armenians to consider withthe Bolsheviks.

In spite of this in the eveningof March 31 Armenians hadjoined the Bolsheviks andattacked Tatars. The attackstarted suddenly. Tatars had 5machine-guns and no artilleryat all: the Bolsheviks andArmenians had 12 ordnances,not counting naval artillery.

Regular Tatar forces counted400-500 men, whereas Armeni-ans had a regiment sinceJanuary, and the Bolshevikshad one and a half regiment attheir disposal. Imperfect organi-zation and Turkish officers’

commanding predetermined their failure.There also were rumours that Tatars didn’t want to make donations for the for-

mation of military units.

The slaughter started in March 31 and stopped in April 3. There were approxi-mately 12000 dead. The houses have been partly burnt down and destroyed.

The “Izmail” building, an architectural masterpiece, was completely destroyed.Those who did not manage to escape were killed by Armenians in their own houses.Armenians disembowelled female Muslims. There was no mercy even to children.Some estrangement between the Bolsheviks (Russians) and Armenians became con-sequence of all these infamous crimes.

I had a little chance to talk to the Tatar intelligentsia, as many of them escaped.Partially to Tiflis.

At present Baku is almost completely cut off from the outer world.”

Armenian aggression is the ideological essence of the state. One glance at thestate emblem of this strange republic is quite enough to understand that, becauseit confirms that this country finds the meaning of own existence in war, terror,deceit and conquests.

The Ararat mountain, although its name has nothing in common with Armenianeither in linguistic, nor in historical sense, is considered to be the place where Noah’sArk had put in to. It is wrong time and place to speculate about veracity or absurdi-ty of this statement, but things take an aggressive-political turn when Armeniansclaim their being descends of forefather Noah; but in case if this idea is confirmed,then the given privilege would be applicable not only to haiks, but to everyone.

Besides that, the Ararat is in the territory of Turkey. How would the Germanreact to engraving of Brandenburg Gates on the Polish state emblem? TheFrench to decorating of Bundestag Plenary Hall with Eiffel Tower, or TowerBridge with the French three-coloured flag? It is inconceivable, isn’t it? There isno longer hammer and sickle today. The Ararat and Ark substitute them well.

21

1918 – 1920 1922 – 1937 since 19.04.1992

QUESTION ON CONSCIENCE:

HOW COULD SOME POLITICIANS SPEAK CERTAINLY ABOUTEVENTS OF 1915, HAVING NOT A SLIGHTEST IDEA ON THE SUB-JECT, INSTEAD OF MASSACRE OF HUNDRED THOUSANDSAND EXILE OF THREE MILLIONS OF SUDET GERMANS AFTERWAR IN 1946?

The answer is simple. Certain circles want to block admission of Turkey intothe European Union at any price and resort to any means to achieve that goal,although simultaneously they simply ignore the Decrees of Benesh still in force, asif nothing had happened.

And that is not the issue here whether Turkey wants or has to join theEuropean Union... this is completely different story. The duplicity is the pointhere, including the duplicity of Christian “representatives of the people” whowant to blame Ankara by deceiving about events of 1915 and knowing nothingabout real situation; but they refuse to utter a word about the Armenian aggressionagainst Azerbaijan which is still in progress! Tens of thousands of killed and onemillion of refugees! Today. Now!

And what about Turkey? Despite of complete encirclement and mass threatsfrom Germany Turkey accepted tens of thousands of refugees during WorldWar Two, including Ernest Reuter and no one was deported. Gratitude: slander.

22

Vienna, June 20, 1984: worthy of love, family and job-devoted diplomat

responsible for wellbeing of arriving Turkish workers, who was born decades

after the tragic events of 1915, was killed by Armenian terrorists in front of

the Turkish embassy. Erdogan Ozen (b.1950!) was my friend. Since then I'm

striving for the truth in history to achieve establishment of peace.

THE STATEMENT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: office of thePress Secretary, April 24, 2005:

“We are committed to search for a peaceful and lasting resolution of the Karabakh conflict. Ihighly appreciate all those people working in the name of peace, tolerance and reconciliation…”

The hope of Armenian mafia in the USA to put pressure upon the President and make himaccept the word “genocide” failed. Whereas quite the contrary happened. Sharp turn ensued.

A sharp turning-point! Theresistance of Turks and

Azerbaijanis to the Armenianfalse propaganda and

aggression is being formed.

Vienna, April 02, 2005 – a demonstration in front of the embassy of the Republic of Hayastanin the day of anniversary of genocide against Azerbaijanis.

The Truth about events of 1915 – that was insidious civil war.The Truth about events of Musa Dagh and cheated Franz Werfel.The Truth about massacres of Turks and Azerbaijanis committed by

Armenians.The Truth about notorious aggressive war of Armenia against Azerbaijan.The Truth about Armenian psycho - and physioterror against Turkey.