10
 CLEARINGHOUSE F O R  FEDK^AL  SCIKNTTFlO^ND __ TECHXirAL  NFORMATION  ardcopy Mloroflch« / A  p p M 00 o C O  c  EFFECTS  F  VELOCITY  N D  ATERIAL  PROPERTIES  ^  N  ESIGN  I M I TS F O R  INEAR  HAPED  NAR6ES m m m n  N VWEPS  REPORT  87S3  NOTS  T P  3194  COPY  145  RobertG.  .  ewell  Weopons  Development  Department  DDC  N u V  9 6 5  ODOiHA  £  BSTR CT This  report  discusses  he design  imits  o r  inear  shaped  charges  hat  are  caused  y  he  behavior  properties  F  the  liner  material  and  by  th e  nature  F  the  collapse  geometry  o F  the  linear  shaped  charge n  he  study  he  etting  process  o r  both  mild  steel  and  copper  is  examined Ptnalsslon  o  release  o  Clearinghouse  or  Federal  SclentlflO  a n d  Teohnioal  nformation  given  y  ü.  .  aval  Ordnance  Test  Station,  China  Lake.  U.S.  NAVAL  ORDNANCE  EST  STATION  C hi na  Like,  California  October  1965  

shaped charge

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

shaped charge

Citation preview

  • CLEARINGHOUSE FOR FEDK^AL SCIKNTTFlO^ND __ TECHXirAL INFORMATION

    ardcopy Mloroflch

    /A pp M 00 o

    CO

    c EFFECTS OF VELOCITY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES ^ ON DESIGN LIMITS FOR LINEAR SHAPED CNAR6ES

    mmi mn

    NAVWEPS REPORT 87S3 NOTS TP 3194

    COPY 145

    i I RobertG. S. Sewell Weopons Development Department

    DDC NuV 8 . 1965

    ODOiHA ABSTRACT. This report discusses the design limits For linear shaped charges that are caused by the behavior properties oF the liner material and by the nature oF the collapse geometry oF the linear shaped charge. In the study the jetting process For both mild steel and copper is examined.

    Ptnalsslon to release to Clearinghouse for Federal SclentlflO and Teohnioal Information given by . S. Haval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake.

    U.S. NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION

    China Like, California October 1965

  • U. S. NAVAL ORDNANCB TBST STATION AN ACTIVITY OF THE BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS

    J. I. HARDY. CART., USN WM. B. MCLEAN. PH.D. Cmmmmndmr Tmchnlcol Dirmctor

    FOREWORD

    The study described in this report was conducted at the U.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station ss part of the continuing warhead research program that is directed toward improving various types of conventional warheads and accomplishing ad- vanced studies snd analyses for anticipated development programs.

    The work was accomplished in May 1965 under Bureau of Naval Weapons Tssk Assignment RMMO-42 994 216-IFOOS-08-06.

    This report is released at the working level. Because of the continuing na- ture of the warhead research and development program, refinements and modifica- tions may later be made in this study.

    Released by Under authority of M. M. ROGERS, Head, F. H. KNEMEYER, Head, AiT'tO'Surface Weapons Div, Weapons Development Dept. 27 August 1965

    NOTS Technical Publication 3894 NAVWEPS Report 8793

    Published by Publishing Division Technicsl Information Department

    Collation Cover, 4 leaves, DD Form 1473, abstract cards First printing 290 numbered copies Security classification UNCLASSIFIED

    (

    it

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    INTRODUCTION

    The l.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station (\OTS) has a rnntinuinp interest in linear shaped charges for warhead applications. A preliminary analysis of the collapse process and a discus- sion of the applications of the end-initiated linear shaped charge are given in Ref. 1. As part of the continuing study, some of the design limits for linear shaped charges have been investigated theoretically. As stated in Ref. I, the limits to be experienced in the design of a linear shaped charge are caused by the behavior properties of the liner nuiterial and also bv the nature of the collapse geometry. In this paper, these limits are anal\/ed for steady-state and non-steady-state conditions.

    STEADY-STATE JETTING ANALYSIS

    Design limits are set by the velocity of the flow of ni

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    With a wall velocity of \0 and a collapse angle of , the flow velocity into the collapse point is

    /='., cot/9

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    My using this asthr hasis for an approximation of the limits of the nonliMlnxiuiamu /one, we can again solve Kq, 7, with lOcr. substituted for.

    IOCT, 2pl(r eom2 (Kl resulting in a series r /ones that can be portraxed a^ shown in l* ig. 2 (for mil! steclt and b ig. \ (for copper). These are a no-jet, too-fast zone, then a central region where the h\drod\namic theory applies, then a questionable zone of nonlndrodv namic beha\ior, and then a no-jet, too-slow limit zone.

    The values used in these calculations are shown in Table I.

    TABLE l. VALUES USED IN THE CALCI LATIONS

    Iti-m Mild MMI (opptr

    Velecit) "f sound ((!), f; MC 19,->()() 1 t.90()

    Density, slues ft l.i.6 17.2-.

    Dynamic yield sirvnulh, kilobflM 12 26

    Ihere is considerable difference between mild steel and copper in behavior in the question able nonhydrodvnanic zone. \s soon as the nonludrodxnamic zone border is reached or the side of descending velocities (in other words, moving from the zone where the ludrodvnamic theory applies into the nonhydrodynamic zone), the jetting process for steel stops almost immediately, but for copper it continues nearly over In the limit of the no-jet, too-slow zone. Part of this is caused by the anomalous behavior of copper, in which it is \ery difficult to establish a set value of dynamic vield strength because the dynamic yield strength ll very dependent upon the rate of loading.

    NON-STEADYSTATE JETTING ANALYSIS

    It is possible to produce non-stead\-state jets even in the no-jet, too-slow region of the steady-state analysis. This is caused by the jump in pressure that results when the two vanes first contact, before the pressure has been spread throughout the impacting walls. When the shock conditions prevail, the pressure is represented not b\ I 2^1, ~ but in terms of the shock pressure

    pCI. m 1 In- shock conditions \ield much higher pressures than do the stead\-state conditions until

    I, approaches the value of the velocity of sound in the material. Hence, for < op|>er, it is found that the non-steady-state pressures sufficient for jetting can be produced at essentialU a zero- degree collapse angle with velocities as low as 210 ft sec; whereas for the stead\-state jet, the limit at I zero-degree angle for achieving the pressure limit is a velocit\ of 1.2H.") fl sec. For mild steel, the steadx-state pressur condition, exceeding the dynamic viHd strength, is achieved with a velocity of H9f) ft sec at zero-degree angle; whereas for the unsteadx, or shock condition, it is achieved at essentiallv 100 ft sec.

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    100

    S

    i mm

    8

    WAll VtlOCITY, FT/StC X 10

    FIG. Z. I.infrtr-ShapcH-rhargr Limits for Mild Sterl.

    100

    6 S 10 12 WAll VIIOCITY, FT/SIC X 10"3

    18

    FKa I. l.inrar-ShapiMl-fihargf l.imilN for (ioppcr.

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    4

    APPLICATION TO EXPLOSIVE WELDING PHENOMENA

    It is possible that the difforoncr in values of the limit coadiliaM for ste.nK-st.ite and non- steady-state jetting may be one of the contributing causes for the MMtCWMCC of the periodic, or wavy, welds in material in explosive welding studies (Mef. 2 and I). In such studies, when the maieri! was first brought together, the dynamic yield strength would Itr rxceeded and jetting would begin. As soon as the jetting process had started, it would \'\v\(\ a pressure relief that would decrease the pressure below the limit required for jetting, and the jetting process would stop. Then, since the jetting process had stopped, the material would be as new materi.il striking again and would go back to the shock position, reapplyinp the pressure that Mould then cause jetting, which would relieve the pressure. This would occur periodically, giving rise to the wavy welds in material in the explosive welding studies (Kip. I).

    FIG. 4. Mi rosir( lure of Wavy Weld in 1018 Steel.

    CONCLUSIONS

    This short study has shown that there exist (1) various regions in possible designs of linear shaped charges in which no |et results because the flow of material is either too fast or loo slow, (2) a questionable /one of nonhydrodynamic behavior, and (3) a zone of design parameters in which the hydrodynamic theory would apply quite nicely.

    This information may be used by the designer of the linear shaped charge in determining the type of effect th.it he will produce. If he desires to produce an all-slug, no-jet charge, he ma\ do it with great confidence of success by designing the charge such that he will be in the no-jet, too- slow region. If he wishes to produce the optimum jet configuration, he will restrict his design to the region where hydrodvnamic theory applies and avoid the nonhvdrodynamic region.

    However, as noted in Mef. 1, because of the gradient in velocity achieved along the vane of a conventional end-initiated linear shaped charge, even though the design parameters are chosen to start at the center of the vane in the hydrodynamic region, as the collapse angle increases and the wall velocit) decreases, there is a transition into the nonhydrodynamic /one and very possibly into the no-jet, too-slow region. At this point the distribution ol masses between jet and slug pre- dicted by the h\drodynamic theory no longer applies.

  • NAVWEPS REPORT 8793

    REFERENCES

    1. I .S. \avul Ordnance Test Station. The Collapse Process and Applications of the Knd- Initiated Linear Shaped Charge (1), by Robert d. S. Sewell and Paul K. Cordle. (ihin.i Lake, Calif., NOTS, August 1965. 28 pp. (NAVWEPS Report 86-49; NOTS TP .mi), CONFIDENTIAL.

    2. Rinehart, John S., and John Pearson. Kxplosive Working of Metals. Londoi Pargamon Press, 1963.

    .\. l.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station. Transactions of the Symposium on Warhead Research, 7-8 May 1963 (U). China Lake, Calif., NOTS, August 1963. Pp. 169-196. (NOTS TP 3301), CON- HDKNTIAL.

  • UNCLASSIFIED Security Claisification

    DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R&D (Steurily elattillcallcn of no body ol btltmel mnd indrnting mnnolmlion muH 6 rnimtad irHn Ih ovmrmll port / c Imtnlimd)

    I OtlCINATIN C ACTIVfy (Coiponf mulhor) U, S, Naval Ordnance Test Station

    2 ncPOMT ttCUMl TV C LAtllFICATlO" UNCLASSIFIED

    26 OWOuP

    i ntpomr TiTL* EFFECTS OF VELOCITY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES ON DESIGN LIMITS FOR LINEAR SHAPED CHARGES

    4 OKSCRIPTIVC NC-CS (Typt ol roporr mnd Inclutirm dm-f

    AUJHOH(S) (Lmul r>mti: lim nmm Intllml)

    Sewell, Robert G. S.

    mtPonr OATF October 1965

    CONTACT o OXANT NO Task Assignment RMMO-42/994/216/-1/F008-08-06

    f> *moj*cr NO

    7 TOTAL NO or PCt 8

    76 NO OF ncn

    tms) NAVWEPS Report 8793 NOTS TP 3894

    6 QTHCH RfonT NOfS; (Any olhtr numbmn tml may b al0ia ml mpotl)

    10 AVAIL ABILITY LIMITATION NOTICI8

    Qualified requesters may receive copies of this report from DDC.

    11 SUPPLIMfNTARV NOTK 12 SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY

    Bureau of Naval Weapons Department of the Navy

    13 ABSTRACT This report discusses the design limits for linear shaped charges that are caused by the behavior properties of the liner material and by the nature of the collapse geometry of the linear shaped charge. In the study the jetting process for both mild steel and copper is examined.

    DD .ttTL 1473 0l0l-tO7-StOO UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification

  • NCLA5SIEIED Security CUtiification

    14 KCV WOODS

    LINK A

    HOLK

    LINK LINK C

    Linear Shaped Charges Collapse Velocity Steady-State Jetting Non-Steady-State Jetting

    INSTRUCTIONS I. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY: Enter the name and addrcas of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, Department of De- fenae activity or other organization fcoipormt author) iasulng the report. 2. REPORT SECUIITY CLASSIFICATION: Enter the over- all aecurity claaalfication of the report. Indicate whether "Reatncted Data" la Included M.arkii^ la to be in accord- ance with appropriate aecurity regulation!. 2b. GROUP: Automatic downgrading la specified in DoD Di- rective 5200.10 and Armed Forcea Industrial Manual. Enter the group number. Alao, whan applicable, ahow that optional marking! have been used for Group 3 and Group 4 as author- ised. 3. REPORT TITLE. Enter the complete report title in all capital letiera. Titlea In all caaea should be unclssslfled. If a meaningful tit'e cannot be selected without claifica- tlon, show title classificstion in all capitala in parenthesis immediately following the title. 4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES: If appropriate, enter the type of report, e.g., interim, progreaa, aummary, annual, or final. Give the incluaive dates when a apecific reporting period ia covered. 5. AirTHOK(S): Enter the naine(a) of authoKa) aa shown on or in the report. Entei Isat name, first name, middle initial. If military, ahow rank and branch of service. The name of the principal atfthor m an ahaolute minimum requirement. 6. REPORT DATE: Enter the date of the report aa day, month, year, or month, year. If more than one date appeara on the report, uae date of publication. 7a. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: The total page count should follow normal pagination procedures, i,e., enter the number of pages containing information, 7b. NUMBER OF REFERENCES. Enter the total number of references cited in the report. Ba. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER: If appropriate, enter the applicable number of the contract or grant under which the report was written 8b, 8r, a Bd PROJECT NUMBER: Enter the appropriate military department identification, auch as project number, aubproject number, ay stem numbers, task number, etc. 9a. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S): Enter the offi- ci?: report number by which the document will be identified and controlled by the originating activity. Thia number must be unique to this report. 96. OTHER REPORT NUMBERfS): If the report hss been sssigned any other report numbers (eithft by (he originator or by the sponsor), also enter this numberfs). 10. AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES: Enter sny lim- itations on further dissemination of the repor* other than thoae

    imposed by security classification, using standard statements auch as:

    (1) "Qualified requesters may obtain copiea of thia report from DOC "

    (2) "Foreign announcement and dieaemination of this report by DDC is not authorized."

    (3) "U. S. Government agenciea may obtain copiea of thia report directly fror- DDC. Other qualified DDC user! shall request through

    (4) "U. S. military agenciea may obtain copiea of thia report directly from DDC Other qualified uaera shsll request through

    (5) "All distribution of this report is controlled. Qual- ified DDC uaera aha** request through

    If the report hss been furnished to the Office of Technical Services, Depsrtment of Commerce, for sale to the public, indi- cate thia fact and enter the price, if known, 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES: Use for additional explana- tory notes. 12. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY: Enter the name of the departmental project office or laboratory sponsoring (pmy ing tor) the research snd development. Include address. 13 ABSTRACT: Enter an abatract giving a brief and factual summary of the document indicative of the report, even though it may alao appear claewhere in the body of the technical re- port. If additional space ia required, a com.nuation sheet ahall be attached.

    It ia highly desirable th.t the abstract uf classified reports be unclssslfled. Each paragraph of the abstract shall end with an indication of the military security clsssificstion of the in- formation in the paragraph, represented as ' TS' (S). (C). or (V)

    There is nu limitation on the length of the abstract. How- ever, the suggested length is from ISO to 22S words 14. KEY WORDS: Key words sre technically meaningful terms or short phrases that characterize a report and may be used as index entries for cataloging the report. Key words must be selected so that no security classification is required. Identi- fiers, such as equipment model des.gnation, trade name, military project code name, geographic location, may be used as key words but will be followed by an indication of technical con- text. The assignment of links, rales, and weights is optional.

    ITNCT.ASSTFTFD Security Classification