Upload
lambao
View
221
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SGTPS, M.P. POWER GENERATING CO. LTD, BIRSINGHPUR
Unit No.
Unit Capacity
Date of commissioning
Boiler/ Turbine Make
Boiler/Turbine Efficiency
Designed Unit
Heat Rate
1 210MW 26-03-1993 ABL/ BHEL 85.3/43.20 2333
2 210MW 27-03-1994 ABL/ BHEL 85.3/43.20 2333
3 210MW 28-02-1999 ABL/ BHEL 86.1/43.20 2311
4 210MW 23-11-1999 ABL/ BHEL 86.1/43.20 2311
5 500 MW 18-06-2007 BHEL/ BHEL 87.99/44.07 2216
SGTPS, UNITS OVERVIEW
4
Year Station Heat Rate
Sp. Coal Consumption
Sp. Oil Consumption P.U.F.
FY 09 3126 0.798 1.063 67.89%
FY 10 3022 0.7843 1.037 65.99%
FY 11 2823 0.7503 1.436 65.78%
FY 12 2784 0.7088 1.543 70.00%
FY 13 2888 0.7264 1.370 73.52%
FY 14 2828 0.7403 0.900 67.21%
(80.77% Incl Backing Down)
SGTPS, M.P. POWER GENERATING CO. LTD, BIRSINGHPUR
Performance of Last Five Years
SGTPS, M.P. POWER GENERATING CO. LTD, BIRSINGHPUR
Efficiency Improvement Opportunities A study revealed that average 1.5% increase in efficiency of Thermal Power Plants in India could result in: • CO2 reduction: 4.5% per annum (over 10 Million
Ton/ annum) • Coal savings: 9 Million tons per annum • Coal savings worth Rs. 630 Crore • Higher productivity from same resources;
equivalent to capacity addition. • Lower generation cost per KWh.
ENERGY CONSERVATION IN THERMAL POWER STATION
Market based mechanism Additional incentive for improving Energy Efficiency Improves the cost economics of Energy Efficiency projects
Increases the profitability Benefits to industry irrespective of their present level of energy efficiency Creates a healthy competition on energy efficiency across industry Ultimately facilitates natural resource conservation
PAT –Perform Achieve and Trade
Covers 685 designated consumers in 9 sectors All DCs consume about 240 mtoe energy i.e. about 60%
of total energy consumption of the country Targets were given to all DCs to achieve the same
within a time frame • Achievement > Target E-certs • Achievement < Target Purchase E-certs / Penalty
National Target = 10 mtoe at the end of 1st PAT Cycle
PAT –Perform Achieve and Trade
National level target -10 MTOE -Apportioned to individual sectors based on their energy consumption -Target for individual Thermal power plants-depending upon the performance of a unit in the sector & potential for energy saving. S. No.
Variation in Net Station Heat rate From Design Net Heat
Rate.
Reduction Target for % Deviation in Net Station
Heat Rate 1 Up to 5 % 15% 2 More than 5 % and up to 10 % 20%
3 More than 10 % and up to 20 % 27%
4 More than 20 % 34%
PAT Scheme –Target setting Methodology
Consumption- 16820917 MT Specific cons - 0.858 kg/kWh GCV - 3966 kcal/kg Energy Input - 66707736 Mcal
Consumption- 8662 MT Specific cons - 0.442 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 86619 Mcal
Consumption- 11552 MT Specific cons - 0.589 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 115523 Mcal
Electricity Import
Electricity – 0 Million kWH
Electricity Generation
Electricity – 19601 Million kWH Gross Heat Rate – 3088 kcal/kWH
Electricity Export to Grid & other
Auxiliary Consumption
Electricity to Grid – 17789 Million kWH Net Station Heat Rate – 3402kcal/kWH
Electricity – 1812 Million kWH Percentage – 9.24 %
SGTPS
CALCULATION OF PAT TARGETS FOR SGTPS (Based on Av. Energy Cons. 2007-08 to 2009-10 SGTPS
CALCULATION OF PAT TARGETS FOR SGTPS
Design Gross Station Heat Rate of PH- 1 & 2 2700 kcal/kWh
Auxiliary Power Consumption target 8.25 %
Design Station Heat Rate of PH- 1 & 2 2943 kcal/kWh
Design Gross Station Heat Rate of PH- 3 2425 kcal/kWh
Auxiliary Power Consumption target 6.00 %
Design Station Heat Rate of PH- 3 2580 kcal/kWh
Overall Design Station Heat Rate 2807 kcal/kWh
Actual Net Station Heat Rate Adjudged by Auditor 3402 kcal/kWh
Deviation in Net Station Heat rate 595 kcal/kWh
Deviation in net station heat rate 29.75 %
Deviation in Net Station Heat rate 595 kcal/kWh
Deviation in Net Station Heat rate 29.75 %
Target Saving 210 kcal/kWh
PAT Target Net Station Heat rate 3192 kcal/kWh
CALCULATION OF PAT TARGETS FOR SGTPS
PAT TARGET FOR THE STATION- SGTPS BIRSINGHPUR
PLAN/ METHODOLOGY DEVISED TO ACHIEVE THE TARGETS OF PAT
REGULAR MONITORING OF PLANT PERFORMANCE
IDENTIFIATION OF AREAS OF EFFICIENCY LOSS
PRIORITIZING THE ISSUES
ACTION PLAN TO PLUG THE LOSS OF EFFICIENCY
MONITORING OF SUCCESS PLAN
QUANTIFICATION OF DATA
REGULAR MONITORING OF PLANT PERFORMANCE VIS-A-VIS TARGETS
REGULAR MONITORING OF PLANT PERFORMANCE VIS-A-VIS TARGETS
MAJOR REASON FOR DEGRADATION IN NET STATION HEAT RATE
LEAKAGE IN AIR PREHEATERS THROUGH FLUE GAS O2 ANALYSIS
AIR INGRESS IN BOILER DUCT AND CASING
HIGH LEVEL OF COMBUSTIBLES IN BOTTOM AND FLY ASH
LOW LEVEL OF CONDENSER VACUUM DUE TO DIRTY CONDENSER
TUBES
LOWER FEED WATER TEMP. DUE TO OUTAGE OF HP HEATERS IN
UNIT NO. 1 & 2
INTERNAL LEAKAGE IN BFP RECIRCULATION VALVES
PARTIAL LOADING DUE TO CAPACITY REDUCTION OF ID FANS
IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER ACTION PLAN
S. Equipment/ Then Recommendation Saving No. System existing status Potential 1 Boiler Leakages in APH, Attend APH leakages 186837 Tons of systems high unburnt , Change burners coal/year, HR 98.7 high excess air reduce excess air in boiler kcal/kWh
High loading of Reduce air ingress in ID Fan furnace 2 Condensers Cleanliness factor Improve cleanliness factor Increased 4.87MW
45 to 71% to 75% by improving on- Load, HR 14.5 line cleaning and elimin- kcal/kWh ating air ingress 3 Aux. Cons. BFP Recirculation Replace valve/ seat Reduction in aux. valves and control cons by around valves passing 1.1 MW 4 Unit Repeated blr Replace Eco & R/H coils Estimated gain tube leakages Replace faulty instrument HR 18.6 Kcal/Kwh Repeated unit trip Causing high oil & aux. consumption
MEDIUM TERM ACTION
MEDIUM & SHORT TERM ACTION- (Operation & Maintenance Practices)
BOILER Fineness analysis to be checked and if the bottom ash un-burnt carbon is more, the +50 mesh size coal may be controlled
Regularly Implemented
A routine check up of un-burnt carbon in bottom ash and fly ash may be done and corrective action taken
Regularly Implemented
Air velocity of Primary air is to be reduced. Done in AOH
Temp. of Secondary air is to be increased. A/H replaced in unit 1 & 2
SADC •Regular maintenance of SADC power cylinders •Ensuring proper inside flap operation and condition.
Done in AOH
EXCESS AIR •Regular monitoring of O2 in flue gas & maintaining secondary air flow accordingly.
Immediately Implemented
IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER ACTION PLAN
SHORT TERM ACTION- (Operation & Maintenance Practices)
Air Pre-heater •Plugging the failed tubes in air heaters at every opportunity. •Improved quality of coal to reduce the erosion of air heater tubes due to high ash content. • Performance evaluation of Air preheater by analysis of oxygen content at the out let of APH to be carried out.
Implemented
IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER ACTION PLAN
Mills •Proper preventive maintenance and adjusting the grinding media clearances and spring assembly loading can improve the mill performance. •Operating the mill at rated parameters so as to improve the performance of the mills.
Implemented
• Clean air flow and dirty air flow test velocity of coal air mixture, this help to balance the coal flow in each PC line. Clean air flow and dirty air flow test velocity of coal air were done.
Implemented
IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER ACTION PLAN
SHORT TERM ACTION- (Operation & Maintenance Practices)
The data for the design model is extracted from the HBD Diagram & PPD of Boilers. The data for operating models taken on two respective time schedule . One on 08th May, with five readings in each hour. The operating model is created by simulation and model gap-analysis is performed. Accordingly, short term & long term recommendations are advised. Since, the unit was under shut-down for 15th May to 30th May’2013 due to Low-system–Demand. The Opportunity was availed to implement short term recommendations. The readings were again taken on 20th Jun and operating model again created. The models of these activities are given in next slides. The overall performance improvements are tabulated in subsequent slide.
EBSILON SIMULATION METHODOLOGY
USE OF EBSILON IN IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF DEFICIENCY
Figure 1: Design Model of the Unit 4 (100% Load condition)
Figure 2: Operating Model of the Unit 4 (Before Improvement Work) USE OF EBSILON IN IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF DEFICIENCY
IMPROVEMENT WORKS CARRIED OUT DURINTG SHORT SHUT DOWN
•AIR HEATERS: SLEEVE PLACEMENT IN TUBE ENDS • BURNERS : INSPECTION OF COAL BURNERS AND REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED ONES • CONDENSER : 1. TUBES PARTIAL CLEANING 2. DETECTION OF AIR INGRESS AND ATTENDING THE SAME •LP HEATERS : 1. ATTENDING THE PASSING OF BYPASS AND DRAIN VALVES 2. ADJUSTMENT OF DRIP LEVEL CONTROLLER
Figure 3: Operating Model of the Unit 4 After Improvement Work
USE OF EBSILON IN IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF DEFICIENCY
Sl No.
Description Unit Design Oper. After Recommended
work
Oper. Before Recommended
work
% Improvement After Mapping
1 Load MW 210 167.25 164.56 1.9473
2 Unit Gross Heat Rate kcal/kwh 2426.2 2412.9 2461.4 -2.01
3 Turbine Heat Rate kcal/kwh 1990 2113.0 2147.0 -1.609
4 Boiler Eff. % 86.1 84.11 83.33 0.927 5 GCV kcal/kg 3500 3715 3710 0.135 6 Sp.Coal Cons. kg/kWh 0.64 0.65 0.66 -1.538
Main Steam Parameters 7 MS Flow at turbine inlet t/h 627.88 498 500 -0.401 8 MS Temp. °C 535 530 530 0.0 9 MS Pressure kg/cm2 150 98.1 99.0 -0.917
10 Condenser Pressure mmHg 75.98 80.6 80.91 0.384 11 Feed water flow t/h 627.88 455.3 457.3 -0.439 12 HPT Efficiency % 90.00 89.3 88.5 0.896 13 IPT Efficiency % 90.77 81.36 81.36 0.0 14 LPT Efficiency % 88.51 87.4 87.36 0.0458 Flue gas/ Air temp.
15 Flue gas temp. at APH I/L °C 339 265.00 265 0.0 16 Flue gas temp. at APH O/L °C 145 110.3 102 7.529
17 Super Heater spray t/h 0 38 42.7 -12.368 18 Reheater spray t/h 0 12 14.2 -18.33 19 Make up water % 0 0.38 0.45 -18.421
UNIT 4 PLANT PARAMETERS DESIGN AND ACTUAL
FACTS ABOUT LP HEATER
The performance of LP Heaters can be analyzed by monitoring • The Terminal Temperature Difference (TTD) • Pressure drop on the feed-water side & • Temperature rise across the heater For a closed feed water heater, the Terminal Temperature Difference (TTD) is defined as: TTD= Sat. Temp. of bled steam–Water Temp. at Heater O/L If the value of TTD is too large, the cycle efficiency will be reduced.
FAULT ANALYSIS
An increase in the TTD and/ or a decrease in the temperature rise indicate the problem could be the result of any or all of the following causes: - Fouled heater tubes (either steam or water side or both). Internal leakage (leakage through the water box
partition plate resulting in a partial internal bypassing of the heater, or, tube-to-tube sheet leakage resulting in feed water leaking to the steam side).
External leakage (through the bypass valve). Plugged tubes (reducing the heat transfer area, while
increasing tube velocity)
In present case, TTD of LPH-2 & LPH -3 were maintaining high. The Problems could be of:- (1) Not maintaining of heater optimum level, (2) Higher pressure drops in the heaters, (3) Passing drain valves/ bypass valves, (4) Presence of non-condensable gases in the heaters
OBSERVATION
Units Load TTD DCA OUTLET TEMP. Net Heat Rate
MW LPH-3
(ºK)
LPH-2 (ºK)
LPH-
1(ºK)
LPH-3
(ºK)
LPH-2
(ºK)
LPH-1 (K)
LPH-3 (ºC)
LPH-2 (ºC)
LPH-1 (ºC)
Design 210.00 2.87 2.95 3.39 0 0 5.90 120 90 57.1 2333.0
Previous Mapping
164.57 7.49 12.79 3.75 0 0 3.28 110 80 55 2556.0
Later Mapping
167.24 2.49 11.29 3.56 0 0 3.45 115 82 55 2498.3
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT TABLE
CASE STUDY-2
CONDENSER PERFORMANCE
The condenser is of two pass, water cooled type condenser having 19208 number of tubes (with 17902 tubes in condensing zone and 1316 tubes in air cooling zone) and total surface area of 9656 m2. Design inlet cooling water temperature is 33ºC and outlet is 41.33 ºC. Design volume flow of cooling water is 7.91 M3/s.
CONDENSER
A small worsening of the back pressure is expensive in terms of the extra heat required for a given output. There are three important parameters: • The CW inlet temperature • Flow of Cooling water • The terminal temperature difference (TTD) For a given input parameters of CW inlet temperature and flow, the back pressure in the condenser also depends in part upon the TTD, which indicates of the heat exchanger condition. Ebsilon Software gives condenser performance in terms of TTD, LMTD & Condenser effectiveness.
FACTS ABOUT THE CONDENSER PERFORMANCE
CONDENSER ANALYSIS THROUGH EBSILON SOFTWARE- DESIGN MODEL
CONDENSER PERFORMANCE BEFORE IMPROVEMENT WORK
CONDENSER PERFORMANCE AFTER IMPROVEMENT WORK
TTD CW Temp. Rise
Cond Pr.
LMTD Effectiveness
Design(A) 3.10 11.5 ºC 0.1033 6.89 0.7656
Previous Mapping (B1) 6.2 11.0 ºC 0.1096 10.8 0.6386
Later Mapping(B2) 5.9 11.0 ºC 0.1078 10.4 0.6509
Deviation (A-B1)/A in % 100% --- 6.07%
56.75%
` 16.59%
Deviation (A-B2)/A in %
90.3% --- 4.35% 50.94% 14.98%
CONDENSER ANALYSIS THROUGH EBSILON SOFTWARE
TABLE INDICATING PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Conclusion- There has been improvement in condenser performance data after the work
USE OF NEW ENERGY EFFICIENCY SOFTWARE- EBSILON
1. THE EBSILON SOFTWARE IS QUITE USEFUL IN IDENTIFICATION OF DEGRADAING COMPONENTS IN THE POWER PLANT CYCLE
2. IT IS ALSO USEFUL IN DATA VALIDATION 3. IT HELPS IN EARLY DETECTION OF FLAW AND
PRESENT STATUS OF STATION HEAT RATE FAIRLY ACCURATELY.
MONITORING OF
SUCCESS PLAN: OTHER TESTS
AND ANALYSIS
Many of the tests were regularly conducted by the energy efficiency cell to achieve the targets of PAT. Some of these tests include the following- •Energy efficiency test of each unit every quarter •Regular dirty pitot test of coal mills- in order to balance the coal-air flow and to optimize the combustion so as to bring about desired improvement. •Condenser performance test- to address the problems of this vital component •Performance test of Air Pre-heaters, including leak test.
OTHER TESTS CONDUCTED REGULARLY TO ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE FOR
CORRECTIVE ACTION
TURBINE PERFORMANCE CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS PICS FROM EXCEL FORMAT
HP HEATER PERFORMANCE CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS PICS FROM EXCEL FORMAT
HP HEATER PERFORMANCE CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS PICS FROM EXCEL FORMAT
FINDINGS BASED ON TESTS AND ANALYSIS- ACTION PLAN
UNIT NO.
DEFICIENCY OBSERVED IMPACT ACTION
1, 2 & 3
Passing in HPBP BP-1 & 2, even in full closed position temp downstream of the valve is maintaining above 400 Deg C.
Efficiency loss, further damage to valve spindle and seat.
Attended in unit overhauling.
1 Air ingress in flue gas duct Higher loading of ID Fan, partial loading
Repair work taken up in next opportunity.
1 & 2
Leakage across the air heater
Removal of air heater, duct repair, wind box replacement along with modified register was done in AOH.
3 Both Main ejectors were in service, vacuum is maintaining -.92, with one ejector vacuum is maintaining -.88.
Adversely affecting the heat rate.
Cause identified and corrected
1 & 2 TDBFP-A has recirculation valve passing of 90T/h and TDBFP-B has a recirculation valve passing of 150T/H.
High aux. Consumption
Attended in AOH
S. No.
Major works undertaken Period Cost of works
Gain
UNIT # 1: 210 MW
1 Replacement of H.P. heaters 5 & 6 in 210 MW 2009-10 Rs. 550 Lacs HR reduced by 42 Kcal/Kwh
2 Replacement of Air heater complete 2010-11
Rs 85 Lacs HR reduced by 27 Kcal/Kwh
3 Replacement of 60 coils of R/H banks and int. banks
2012-13 Rs 10 Lacs
Tripping avoided
4 Replacement of ID Fan runner 2010-11 Rs. 40 lacs Partial loading avoided
UNIT # 2: 210 MW
1 Replacement of H.P. heaters 5 & 6 2010-11 Rs. 550 Lacs HR reduced by 42 Kcal/Kwh
2 Replacement of Air heater complete 2011-12 Rs 85 Lacs HR reduced by 27 Kcal/Kwh
2 Replacement of wind box & modified air registers
2011-12 Rs . 242 lacs Better combustion
3 Replacement of ID Fans runner 2010-11 Rs. 40 lacs Partial loading avoided
4 Replacement of R/H coils of bottom int. banks, front & rear cage wall
2011-12
Rs 1000 Lacs
Tripping avoided
MAJOR WORKS TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT IN HEAT RATE OF SGTPS:
MAJOR WORKS TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT IN HEAT RATE OF SGTPS:
S. No.
Major works undertaken Period Cost of works
Gain
UNIT # 3: 210 MW
1 Replacement of Air heater tubes 7000 Nos.
2013-14 Rs. 9.0 Lacs
HR reduction by 11 Kcal/ Kwh
UNIT # 4: 210 MW
1 Replacement of Air heater tubes 20000 Nos.
2013-14 Rs. 14.0 Lacs
HR reduction by 16 Kcal/ Kwh
ACHIEVEMENT OF
FIRST CYCYLE PAT TARGET
SGTPS, M.P. POWER GENERATING CO. LTD, BIRSINGHPUR
ACHIEVEMENT OF PAT TARGETS BASED ON AV. ENERGY CONS. & HEAT RATE
PRESENT STATUS
2010-11 to 2013-14 FOR SGTPS
Consumption- 23806718 MT Specific cons - 0.731 kg/kWh GCV - 3855 kcal/kg Energy Input - 91774897 Mcal
Consumption- 15397 MT Specific cons - 0.472 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 153972 Mcal
Consumption- 27417 MT Specific cons - 0.834 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 274172 Mcal
Electricity Import
Electricity – 0 Million kWH
Electricity Generation
Electricity – 32568 Million kWH Gross Heat Rate – 2831 kcal/kWH
Electricity Export to Grid & other
Auxiliary Consumption
Electricity to Grid – 29933 Million kWH Net Station Heat Rate – 3080 kcal/kWH
Electricity – 2634 Million kWH Percentage – 8.088 %
SGTPS
ACHIEVEMENT OF PAT TARGETS BASED ON AV. ENERGY CONS. & HEAT RATE
PRESENT STATUS
2010-11 to 2013-14 & FY 14-15 UP TO DEC’14 FOR SGTPS
Consumption- 27795250 MT Specific cons - 0.734 kg/kWh GCV - 3827 kcal/kg Energy Input –106364947946 Mcal
Consumption- 19384ML Specific cons - 0.512 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 193832 Mcal
Consumption- 30572 ML Specific cons - 0.807 ml/kWh GCV - 10000 kcal/liter Energy Input - 305710 Mcal
Electricity Import
Electricity – 0 Million kWH
Electricity Generation
Electricity – 37859 Million kWH Gross Heat Rate – 2810 kcal/kWH
Electricity Export to Grid & other
Auxiliary Consumption
Electricity to Grid – 34774Million kWH Net Station Heat Rate – 3059kcal/kWH
Electricity – 3084.9 M kWH Percentage – 8.148 %
SGTPS
FUTURE PLANNING- FURTHER REDUCTION IN NSHR
•Energy audit is being conducted in all the units along with BOP to explore areas of further improvement and possible benefits thereof. • Renovation and modernization for adoption of recent technologies along with necessary retrofitting for 4X210 MW Units. (Activities are underway) • Potential of further reduction in auxiliary consumption are being explored. • Reduction in auxiliary consumption of coal and ash handling system through low ash coal.
FUTURE PLANS LED BASED
ILLUMINATION FOR
POWER STATION
PROJECT- USE OF LED ILLUMINATION FOR POWER STATION
CONCLUSION- LED BASED ILLUMINATION
• THE ABOVE IS A MODEL CALCULATION FOR LED LIGHTING FOR ONE CONTROL ROOM OF 2X210 MW PH-1 OF SGTPS. • SIMILAR CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN DONE IN RESPECT OF OTHER POWER HOUSES AND INSTALLATIONS OF SGTPS • THE SAVINGS ARE HUGE AND THE PAY BACK PERIOD IS OF THE ORDER OF 2 TO 3 YEARS. • LOOKING TO THE QUANTUM OF SAVINGS VIS-À-VIS INVESTMENT, THE PROPOSAL TO TOTALLY SHIFT TO LED BASED ILLUMINATION FOR THE POWER STATION IS A VIABLE SCHEME. • THE ABOVE IS A HEALTHY ENERGY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITY AND THE SAME MAY BE MADE MANDATORY FOR THE POWER STATIONS.
POINTS FOR BRAIN STORMING
1. UNITS HAVE TO BE RUN ON PARTIAL LOAD DUE TO LOW SYSTEM DEMAND: IT IS WELL KNOWN FACT THAT IN PARTIAL LOADING, HEAT RATE IS
HIGHER THAN DESIGNED. PARTIAL LOADING IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED IN DECIDING THE PAT TARGETS. (SGTPS HAS SUFFERED 13% LOSS OF GEN DUE TO LOW SYSTEM DEMAND DURING YEAR 13-14).
2. UNIT STAND BY DUE TO LOW SYSTEM DEMAND: UNITS HAVE TO BE KEPT AS STAND BY AND CONSUMPTION OF FUEL OIL
OCCURS DURING START UP. THIS ADDS TO THE HEAT RATE AND AUXILIARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION. IT IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED IN DECIDING THE PAT TARGETS.
PLEASE THINK OVER IT
Thank you for
your kind attention