Upload
janis-dixon
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SFCCENVIRONMENTAL SCANOffice of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
2
Preface
This Environmental Scan has been completed in support of the Strategic Planning process for SFCC.
The data used for our Environmental Scan came from a great deal of research from many sources, such as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Lumina Foundation, files prepared for the HED from SFCC data, the 2010 U.S. Census, the Public Education Department, CCSSE, SENSE, Noel-Levitz, the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, the SFCC Sustainability Plan, and countless other sources.
We hope that you find this Environmental Scan helpful and informative. As always with institutional research, we know that this will answer some questions and raise many others.
Thank you from the Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness.
3
Table of Contents
Workforce/Economic Development
New Mexico and Santa Fe Demographics
Industry and Projected Growth Need for Middle Skills in NM Strategic Priorities for Our
Community
High School to College Pipeline
High School Graduation Poverty Santa Fe School District Developmental Education
Our Student Population Continuing Education Adult Basic Education Credit Students
Non-degree Seeking Dual Credit / High School
Degree Seeking Financial Aid Retention SFCC Students Transferring Out Graduation Student Experience
SFCC Employees Employee Demographics Employee Engagement
Institutional Effectiveness SFCC Organizations Previous Strategic Plan Institutional Finance Debt Management and Finance
Plan Tax Base Information Historical Financials Funding Formula Bonds Campus Security Sustainability Higher Education Trends
WORKFORCE / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
5
Quick Facts: New Mexico & Santa Fe
Recession has impacted job creation over the past three years Unemployment rate (Jan, 2013):
US = 7.9% NM = 6.2% Santa Fe = 5.4%
Largest projected job growth in NM Health Care Educational Services
69.8% of existing jobs in NM only require high school diploma or short-term on-the-job training
88.7% of existing jobs in NM are in service-providing industries The proportion of government jobs in NM is high
Source: Census 2010
6
Santa Fe County Demographics
Population = 144,170
Under 5 ye
ars
5 to 9
years
10 to 1
4 years
15 to 1
9 years
20 to 2
4 years
25 to 2
9 years
30 to 3
4 years
35 to 3
9 years
40 to 4
4 years
45 to 4
9 years
50 to 5
4 years
55 to 5
9 years
60 to 6
4 years
65 to 6
9 years
70 to 7
4 years
75 to 7
9 years
80 to 8
4 years
85 years
and o
ver
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
8,217 8,275 8,531 8,3877,526
8,0598,569 8,838
9,358
10,72711,624
12,40111,854
8,088
5,297
3,648
2,519 2,252
By Age Range
Source: Census 2010
7
Gender Ethnicity
51.3%48.7%
Female Male
Population = 144,170
Unknown
2 or more
White
Native Hawaiian
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
0.00% 15.00%30.00%45.00%60.00%
0.23%
1.17%
43.90%
0.04%
50.64%
0.66%
1.09%
2.27%
Santa Fe County Demographics
Source: Census 2010
8Industry and Projected Growth
9
2012 November Regional Nonfarm Employment Growth
UT TX OK AZ CO CA US NV WY NM
3.1%
2.6%2.4% 2.4%
2.3%
1.9%
1.4%1.2%
0.5%
-0.6%
November 12 over November 11 – Not Seasonally Adjusted by States
Source: NMDWS LASER
10
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions (NMDWS): 1st Quarter, 2011
Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe Grant Hidalgo Dona Ana $-
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$68,848
$44,824 $44,356 $43,680 $42,380 $40,612
$37,804 $35,204 $34,840 $33,384
Average Annual Wage
7th
Source: NMDWS LASER
11
NMDWS:1st Quarter, 2011
Los Alamos Eddy Sandoval Lea San Juan Bernalillo Santa Fe Grant Hidalgo Dona Ana -
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
16,557 24,168 29,342 27,196
47,430
307,657
59,989
9,030 1,556
68,178
Total Average Employment
3rd
Source: NMDWS LASER
12
Quick Facts: cont’d from page 5 Education in Santa Fe
High school graduate or higher (age 25+) 86.8% Bachelor’s degree or higher (age 25+) 39.6%
Language in Santa Fe Percentage of other than English spoken at home
35.5% Largest Industry in Santa Fe (GDP)
Real estate Government Retail Health Care & Social Assistance
Source: NMDWS LASER
13
Real Gross Domestic Product by Industry Santa Fe MSA
Source: NMDWS
14
Major Employers# of
Employer Type Employees
State of New Mexico Government 19,749
Los Alamos National Laboratory Government 10,086
Christus St. Vincent Hospital Health Care 2,021
Santa Fe School District Education 1,708
City of Santa Fe Government 1,513
Santa Fe Community College Education 943
County of Santa Fe Government 846
Peters Corporation Real Estate 730
Buffalo Thunder Casino 700
Santa Fe Opera Fine Arts 630
Total Top 10 38,926
Source: Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce, 2013
Source: RBC Capital Market
15
Labor Force
Source: RBC Capital Market
Santa Fe MSA State of New Mexico United StatesLabor Percent Labor Percent Percent
Year Force Unemployed Force Unemployed Unemployed
2012 77,171 5.10% 938,982 6.50% 7.80%
2011 77,601 5.20% 944,552 6.40% 8.50%
2010 77,335 7.00% 959,513 8.20% 9.80%
2009 77,781 5.00% 950,757 5.70% 8.90%
2008 80,586 4.00% 961,145 4.70% 6.10%
2007 76,975 2.90% 934,099 3.50% 4.70%
2006 77,191 3.60% 951,287 4.10% 4.70%
2005 78,046 4.60% 934,667 5.80% 5.60%
2004 84,069 2.90% 910,502 4.80% 5.70%
2003 79,356 3.00% 878,749 6.10% 5.80%
Source: New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions
Labor Force and Percent Unemployed
16
2012 Job Growth in Santa Fe
Public Sector Leisure and hospitality Education and health service Retail trade Financial activities
-100
500
200
100 100
Santa Fe County
Source: NMDWS
17
NMDWS: 3rd Quarter, 2011
Public Adminstration
Health Care and Social Assistance
Retail Trade
Accommodation and Food Services
Education Services
Construction
Professional, Scientific & Technical Svc
Other Services
Administrative & Waste Services
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
9,845
9,380
8,645
8,700
4,275
3,260
2,365
2,590
2,430
2,275
Number of Employees by Industries
Source: NMDWS
18
Industry for Santa Fe
1. Public Administration : 21%2. Health Care and Social Assistance : 18%3. Retail Trade : 16%4. Accommodation and Food Services : 15%5. Education Services : 9%6. Construction : 5%7. Professional, Scientific and Tech Svc. : 5%8. Other : 5%9. Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation : 4%
Source: NMDWS LASER
19
Projected Employment Change
IndustryNew
Mexico 2009-2019
Santa Fe 2009-2019
Government 7,040 2,000Health Care & Social Assistance 27,020 1,840Educational Services 10,130 1,640Accommodation & Food Services 10,040 1,180Administrative & Support Services 4,480 930Retail Trade 9,000 690Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 6,100 660Construction 5,800 390Other Services 1,480 260Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1,430 190Finance & Insurance 1,750 110Transportation & Warehousing 1,400 90Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 1,230 40
Source: NMDWS
20
Projected Industry Percent Change
IndustryNew
Mexico 2009-2019
Santa Fe 2009-2019
Administrative & Support Services 10.30% 41.00%Educational Services 12.50% 32.70%Health Care & Social Assistance 23.90% 23.60%Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 10.90% 23.30%Transportation & Warehousing 7.70% 17.80%Accommodation & Food Services 12.30% 14.70%Government 7.50% 14.10%Other Services 13.20% 10.90%Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 10.20% 9.80%Construction 11.10% 8.90%Retail Trade 10.40% 7.50%Finance & Insurance 7.90% 6.10%Real Estate, Rental & Leasing 12.40% 4.30%
Source: NMDWS
21
Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018
Personal and Home Care Aides
Food Prep Workers
Retail Salespersons
Home Health Aides
Elementary School Teachers
Waiters and Waitresses
Construction Laborers
Janitors
Cashiers
Carpenters
Middle School Teachers
Cooks
Supervisors of Food Prep Workers
Supervisors of Construction
Receptionists
Truck Drivers
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
671
574
456
321
268
261
229
208
170
151
136
134
120
120
109
107
Jobs that do not require Community College level of education or require education beyond Community College level
*Less than 40% of job openings require Community College level education or job openings require education beyond Community College
Source: NMDWS LASER
22
Estimated Annual Job Openings in Santa Fe County: 2008-2018
* At least 40% of job openings require Community College level education
Source: NMDWS LASER
23
Emerging Industries to Watch as Defined by NMDWS
Solar Panel Manufacturing Wind Generation Plants Uranium Mining Film
Source: NMDWS State of the Workforce 2012
24
A middle-skill job requires education or training past high school, but not a four-year degree.
The Need for Middle-Skills in NM
25
New Mexico’s Forgotten Middle-Skill Jobs Report (April 2010)
Middle-skill jobs represent the largest share of jobs in New Mexico 48% – and the largest share of future job openings.
The demand for middle-skill workers in the state will remain high in the decade between 2006 and 2016 More than 133,000 middle-skill job openings in New Mexico 40% of all job openings in New Mexico
63% of the people who will be in New Mexico’s workforce in the year 2020 were already working adults in 2005 – long past the traditional high school-to-college pipeline.
Source: Skills2Compete – New Mexico campaign
26
NM Jobs and Total Job Openings by Skill Level, 2006-2016
Source: Calculated by National Skill Coalition from NMDWS data
27
We need to prepare our students now for jobs that we do not know will exist in the future
However, the biggest challenge is…
28
Future Skills Needed - Lumina
Higher learning has taken on new importance in today’s society.
To succeed in the contemporary workplace, today’s students must prepare for jobs that are rapidly changing, use technologies that are still emerging, and work with colleagues from (and often in) all parts of the globe.
The challenges that graduates face as citizens during their lives are similarly complex and also are affected by developments around the world.
Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century
29
Degree Qualifications Skills Profile Specialized and Broad/Integrative Knowledge
Apply existing knowledge and techniques Evidenced based decision making Broad multidiscipline approach and importance of Liberal Arts education
Ability to approach a challenge from a multifaceted perspective
Intellectual Skills/Analytical Inquiry Analytic inquiry Use of information resources Engaging diverse perspectives information resources Quantitative fluency
Civic Learning Out-of-classroom experience Capacity for analysis and reflection Analytic inquiry Engagement with diverse perspectives
Source: Lumina Foundation – Qualification Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century
30
21st Century Skills Content
Collaboration Working with others respectfully and effectively to create, use and share
knowledge, solutions and innovations.
Information Management Accessing, analyzing, synthesizing, creating and sharing information from
multiple sources.
Effective Use of Technology Creating the capacity to identify and use technology efficiently, effectively and
ethically as a tool to access, organize, evaluate and share information
Career and Life Skills Developing skills for becoming self-directed, independent learners and workers
who can adapt to change, manage projects, take responsibility for their work, lead others and produce results.
Cultural Awareness Developing cultural competence in working with others by recognizing and
respecting cultural differences and working with others from a wide range of cultural and social backgrounds.
Source: Lumina Foundation - Qualifications Profile: New Skills for the 21st Century
31 Strategic Priorities for Our Community
32
City of Santa Fe General Plan
COMMUNITY GOALS:
The General Plan has 14 overall themes, or community goals, that reflect the results of the 1994 community survey. Each chapter contains at least one of these goals in the “Goals & Policies” section at the end of the chapter. The goals are not necessarily listed in order of priority.
1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
2. QUALITY OF LIFE
3. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
4. ECONOMIC DIVERSITY
5. SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
6. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE
7. WATER
8. CHARACTER
9. URBAN FORM
10.COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DOWNTOWN
11.COMMUNITY-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
12.MIXED USE
13.REVIEW PROCESS
14.IMPLEMENTATION
Source: City of Santa Fe - General Plan Update 2005-2025
33
Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
• Funding Santa Fe County Health Programs
• Senior Service Program Operation
• New Judicial Complex• Sustaining Operations
Funding for Correctional Facilities
• Centralized Purchasing and Warehouse
• Citizen Survey• Boards and Committee
Project• Succession Planning• Automate Human
Resources• County Sponsored
Daycare
• Job Description Analysis• College Intern Program• PERA Corrections Plan• Enhance Supervisory
Training Opportunities• Develop Human
Resources Staff Process Manual
• Timekeeping Software System
• In-House Finance Statement
• Recession Planning (SAVE Initiative)
• Sustainable Land Development Plan (DLDP)
• Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
• Affordable Housing
• Fire Funding• County Re-
Organization• Conjunctive Water
Plan• Renewable Energy
Financing Program• County Building
Permit Program• Santa Fe Canyon
Ranch Property• Santa Fe Studios• Public Information
/ Transparency Program
• County Code Rewrite
Source: Santa Fe County – Strategic Plan Update (Jan 2010 – Jan 2012)
34
Santa Fe Public Schools
Source: SFPS Strategic Planning 2012
GOALS
1. Create an environment that raises expectations and promotes high academic performance of all students at 100% of Santa Fe Public Schools.
2. Recruit and support highly qualified and effective personnel at every level and every function throughout Santa Fe Public School District.
3. Develop a culture of shared responsibility for student success by engaging families and the community
4. Promote a safe, sustainable, healthy and respectful school community
5. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning
6. Ensure efficient and effective systems, operations, state-of-the art technology and infrastructure to support instruction and student learning.
35
SFCC Adult Basic Education
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
KEY SYSTEM
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
1. Leadership A. Build an efficient, creative team by using collaborative managementB. Empower staff and create an environment that recognizes contributionC. Encourage staff to participate in regular professional developmentD. Increase student leadership opportunities
2. Administration and Data
A. Improve staff training on administrative activitiesB. Reduce data bottleneckC. Educate appropriate staff on record-keeping responsibilities
3. Effective Teaching and Learning
A. Develop ABE/ASE assessment processes to align assessments with curriculum, better demonstrate student learning, and support level gains on NRS tests
B. Increase intensity of instruction by offering a variety of instructional delivery options
C. Complete curriculum guidelines and exit standards for all levels of ESLD. Increase supplemental instruction in both workplace and computer
literacy to enhance student learning and persistence
4. Intake A. Improve student persistence in literacy programs through a standardized orientation process
B. Develop cohorts for students during ABE/ASE orientation to build community and encourage retention
C. Improve individualized ABE/ASE student advising and placement process
D. Improve and standardize the ESL orientation process
36
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
KEY SYSTEM
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
5. Integration and Transitions
A. Develop a continuous cycle of student goal setting and reportingB. More accurately survey entering students from all parts of ABE to gain
a fuller understanding of their specific career interests (for Career Pathways planning)
C. Develop a comprehensive framework for class, college, career advising among ABE staff directly involved in these tasks
D. Develop a continuous cycle of advising/career counseling to increase students’ awareness of their own educational and career possibilities
E. Expand contextualized learning experiencesF. Expand use of Work keys testingG. Develop relationship with One-Stops to gain a more comprehensive
understanding of their operations and to increase collaboration
6. Outreach A. Conduct environmental scan of stakeholders: current and potential students, instructors, tutors, businesses, and community partners
B. Convene ABE Advisory BoardC. Develop at least one new funding sourceD. Create a waitlist system for students who cannot receive immediate
services
HIGH SCHOOL TO COLLEGE PIPELINE
38
High School Graduation 2012
Source: NM Public Education Department – 4-Year Graduation Rates, Cohort of 2012
Tierra Encantada
Santa Fe High
Monte Del Sol
Career Academy
Capital High
Academy for Tech
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
35.7%
67.6%
65.3%
35.8%
60.7%
84.1%
Local High School graduation rate: 61.8%
39
2010-2011 School Year 12th Grade Enrollment and Fall 2012 SFCC Enrollment
MAST
ER PROGRAM
NM S
CHOOL FO
R ARTS
SANTA
FE
HIGH
CAPITA
L HIG
H
CAREER A
CADEMY
MONTE
DEL
SOL
ACADEMY
FOR T
ECH &
CLA
SS
TIER
RA ENCANTA
DA0
50
100
150
200
250
300
26 30
244
187
51 44 411322 4
98 95
9 11 16 10
12th Grade SFCC Enrollment
*Private Schools and Santa Fe Indian School 12th Grade Data Unavailable
Source: SFPS and HED DEAR data
40
Poverty and Education at a Glance 18.4 percent of New Mexicans and 15.6 percent of Santa Feans live below
the poverty level.
Twenty-two percent of children who have lived in poverty do not graduate from high school, compared to 6 percent of those who have never been poor.
The gap in standardized test scores between affluent and low-income students has grown by about 40 percent since the 1960s
Between the late 1970s and mid-1990s, the college graduation rate of American youth
from families in the top quarter of the income distribution increased by 21 percentage points:
33 percent to 54 percent
from families in the bottom quarter of the income distribution increased by just 4 percent
5 percent to 9 percent
New Mexico ranked 46th in the nation in terms of child well-being in an overall ranking of the 2011 Kids Count reportSource:
http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/News/inthenews.PDFs/AprToJuly2012/us2010.news.2012.05.26.thenewmexican.pdf
41
Poverty in SFPS High Schools
Source: SFPS 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 School Report Cards
Academy for Tech Capital High Career Academy Monte del Sol Santa Fe High Tierra Encantada0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
26%
68%
39%
20%
50%
27%31%
70% 72%
N/A
48%
N/A
Santa Fe School District Free or Reduced Lunch
2010-2011 2011-2012
42
Santa Fe School District -2010
Acade
my
For T
ech
Capita
l Hig
h
Caree
r Aca
dem
y
Mon
te D
el S
ol
Sant
a Fe
Hig
h
Tier
ra E
ncan
tada
GED0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
46%
72% 69%
42%
55%
N/A
63%
Developmental Rates
Source: Ready for College 2010
43
Statewide Developmental Education Rates
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 200925.0%
27.0%
29.0%
31.0%
33.0%
35.0%
37.0%
39.0%
41.0%
43.0%
45.0%
37.2%
39.1%
42.5%43.2% 43.4%
40.7%
38.7% 39.0%
40.3%
37.3%
30.6% 31.0%
32.3%31.5%
30.5%
32.6%
31.3%
32.9%31.9%
29.2%
Percentage of NM Public High School Graduates Who Took Remedial Classes Only in Math or Only in Reading: 00-09
Math English
Source: Ready for College 2010
44
Developmental Education Rate
Statewide: Public Statewide: GED Statewide: Capital High FTF DS to SFCC FTF DS to SFCC 17-190%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
54%
63%
72%
87%
93%
Source:
OUR STUDENT POPULATION
46
About SFCC
Established in 1983, SFCC has been providing education to the community for 30 years.
More than 15,000 students are served each year in its credit, non-credit, and adult basic education programs. 7,400 individual students in credit classes every year 5,828 students are degree seeking students 2,805 degree-seeking students receive financial aid More than 200 high school students in dual credit programs each term part-time students: 78%
Over 100 degree and certificate programs offered. Approximately 258 full-time and 51 part-time staff. Approximately 69 regular faculty and 270 adjunct faculty. The SFCC District is identical to the Santa Fe Public School District and
includes the outlying areas of Glorieta, Madrid, Cerrillos, Lamy, La Cienega, Galisteo and Tesuque. It covers most of Santa Fe County which has a population of more than 145,000 residents.
SFCC is one of eighteen community colleges in NM.
Source: Banner, IPEDS, HED DEAR data, Census 2010
47 Continuing Education (CE) Students
48
CE Students by Age
Unduplicated Students = 1,495
17 AND < 18 TO 24 25 TO 34 35 TO 44 45 TO 54 55 TO 64 65 AND >Not Reported0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
4.95% 5.55%
12.44% 12.84%
17.53%
23.68%
20.60%
2.41%
Source: Banner
49
CE Enrollment by Subject
Leisure
Sustainability Tech Cntr
Kids' Stuff
Weatherization
Cooking
Art
Energy Audit
Crafts
Southwest Explorations
Fitness and Wellness
Health Care Professional
OSHA
Languages
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
67
68
80
83
88
88
94
129
130
132
192
288
346
Computes/Macintosh
Creative Writing
Dance
Money Matters
Music
Lead Certification
Computers/Web Design
Photography
Computers/Digital Image
Computer Classes
Computer- Inexperienced
Bus/Professional Skills
Home and Garden
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
17
18
23
23
23
24
29
31
32
34
42
54
62
Total Registration = 2,197Source: Banner
50
CE Number of Courses by Length
1 d
ay
2 d
ays
3 d
ays
4 d
ays
5 d
ays
6 d
ays
7 d
ays
8 d
ays
9 d
ays
10
da
ys
11
da
ys
12
da
ys
15
da
ys
22
da
ys
29
da
ys
31
da
ys
36
da
ys
43
da
ys
50
da
ys
88
da
ys
12
1 d
ays
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
7065
13
20
5 7
1 1
7
15
1 1
7 73
36
16
69
2 3
Total Courses = 216Source: Banner
51 Adult Basic Education
52
SFCC Adult Basic EducationKey Data And Information
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Student Data Students with 12 hours or More
Total count of students with 12 hours or more: 1,929
Total contact hours for students with 12 hours or more:
112,162
Average contact hours for students with 12 hours or more:
58.15
Average contact hours for students experiencing level gains:
83.84
Count of all GED graduates with 12 hours or more: 117
Count of GED en Español graduates with 12 hours or more:
26
53
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)Key Data And Information
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Student Data Students with less than 12 hours
Total count of students with less than 12 hours: 112
Total contact hours for students with less than 12 hours:
505
Count of all GED graduates with less than 12 hours: 2
Count of GED en Español graduates with less than 12 hours:
0
Student Data All Students (regardless of hours)
Total student count: 2,041
Number of total instructional hours: 112,667
54
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)Administrative and Fiscal
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Cost Per Student
(State dollars spent + Federal dollars spent) (number of students with 12 hours or more)State: $510,357.81Federal: $222,887.00EL/Civics: $ 38,428.00Total: $771,672.81
= $400.04
$771,672.81 ÷ 1,929 fundable students = $400.04/student
$771,672.81 ÷ 112,162 = $6.88 Cost Per Contact Hour
55
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Activities 2011-2012
Twelve students took the Work Keys exam, earning Career Readiness Certificates.
Twelve ABE students participated in an Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST) program in the building trades area, working on college certificates in plumbing.
The EL/Civics Coordinator advised, during the academic year, a total of 88 students on career/college choices and class placement within the ABE program, and provided an atmosphere of support with wrap-around services to assist students in their learning endeavorsSeventy three ABE students participated in a series of digital literacy workshops in collaboration with Fast Forward New Mexico to prepare them for technological aspects of career readiness. Several of these workshops were bilingual presentations.
56
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)ESL Activities 2011-2012
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
GOAL ATTAINMENTAY 2011-2012
OUTCOMEAY 2011-2012
Enroll at least 500 students per semester (at least 1000 students per year) in integrated ESL/Civics classes.*
Enrolled 896 total students for the entire year (842 fundable
100% Pre-test rate 75% Post-test rateStudents will achieve the following level gains:ESL 1 Literacy: 40%ESL 2 Low Beginning: 48% ESL 3 High Beginning: 48%ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 36%ESL 5 High Intermediate: 36%ESL 6 Advanced: 14%
100% Pre-test rate 73% Post-test rate Level Gains: Overall: 37.89%ESL 1 Literacy: 60.00%ESL 2 Low Beginning: 68.29%ESL 3 High Beginning: 55.24%ESL 4 Low Intermediate: 39.83%ESL 5 High Intermediate: 34.39%ESL 6 Advanced: 16.48%
*Note that the figure for 1000 students enrolled was based on our original application for full funding of this grant. Our actual allocation was 66% of what was requested, and we served 90% of that original objective
57
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Success 2011-2012
Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study: SFCC ABE was highly engaged throughout this year in the HED Self Study process. All of the department’s administrative staff took on significant leadership activities as we worked through the requirements and goals of the Self Study. Continued High Levels of Student Performance: Despite reduced funding, the ESL Program has continued to significantly exceed state averages for level gains. Our students’ level gains at all NRS levels are higher than 2010-11 state averages, ranging from 3 percentage points higher at ESL Low Intermediate to 18 percentage points higher at ESL Low Beginning. Community Support of the ESL Program: This past year, two of our community partners, Santa Fe Civic Housing Authority and United Way, stepped in to provide financial support for classes at their sites.
58
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Successes 2011-2012Program Improvements Based on HED Self Study
Continued High Levels of Student Performance
Community Support of the ESL Program
424 students were served in the Literacy program by 143 volunteer tutors who provided 11,495 hours of instruction.
Instructional Staff Implementing as new curriculum
Expansion of an Independent Study Option for Students
Continued offering student orientations and one on one advising
Successfully utilized linked science and social studies classes for transition program
Increased the Intensity of Study through managed enrollment
I-BEST During the spring semester of FY 2011-12, SFCC ABE partnered with New Mexico Skill Up Network to offer an I-BEST project in SFCC’s School of Trades and Technology. Distance Education -During the 2011-12 Fiscal Year, SFCC ABE continued to provide Distance Learning in the ABE/ASE program.In 2011-2012, students were referred for potential Power Path screening and intervention if they scored a 12 or higher on their Learning Needs Assessments and also scored a 6.0 or below in at least one of the TABE areas.
Increase from 65% in 2009-10 to 68% in 2010-11 to 77% of students gaining levels in 2011-12
59
SFCC Adult Basic Education (cont.)
Source: SFCC Adult Basic Education – Strategic Plan 2011-2014
Challenges 2011-2012
Continue refining integrated ESL/Civics model across NRS levels
Continue to increase integration between ESL program and EL/Civics program,Continue to revise and improve EL/Civics writing curriculum across NRS levels continue to improve assessment scoring guides to promote fairness in assessing both language skills and knowledge of content
Increase activities and advisement of ABE students who want to transition to college and careers
Support students on paths to U.S. Citizenship
budget allocations for 2011-12 were again significantly reduced. As we face these continuing reductions, we are working creatively with our partners to continue services through cost-sharing and when we must make service cuts, we look for ways that will have the least impact on students.
60
• Non-degree Seeking• Dual Credit / High School• Degree Seeking
Looking at Credit Students
61
By Gender By Race/Ethnicity
Demographics of Credit Students
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students
White
Hispan
ic
Unkow
n
Amer
ican
Indian
Black
Asian
Two
or M
ore
Inte
rnat
iona
l
Pacifi
c0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%44%
40%
10%
3% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0%63%
37%
Female Male
62
Degree Seeking Status by Age Group
17 or younger 18-24 25-35 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 or older -
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
125
1,437
1,095
584 434
267 148
220
188
232
274
339 565
615
Degree Seeking Non-Degree Seeking
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students
63
Student Level Credit Load
Student Characteristics
High School
Freshman
Sophomore
Non-Degree
5%
36%
25%
34%
61% De-gree Seek-ing
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 Total Enrollment: 6,523 Students
>0 but <=3
>3 but <=6
>6 but <=9
>9 but <12
>=120%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
39%
18%
11%
6%
26%
64
Student Experience
Source: HED DEAR data
What are the courses like in a given academic year?Summer
2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012
# of Courses 327 949 965
Average Class Size 16 18 18
% Taught by Adjunct 71.1% 61.7% 62.4%
Online Courses 49 = 15% 97 = 10% 102 = 11%
Student to Faculty ratio = 17:1
65
Student Credit Hours by College
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000
10,773
20,691 21,710
33,786
4,329
11,077
22,106 22,971
36,562
4,836 10,208
22,340 23,789
36,732
5,011
FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12
Source: HED DEAR data
66 Credit Students: Non-degree Seeking
67
Gender Breakdown by Semester
FT/PT Breakdown by Semester
Non-degree Seeking Students
Source: HED DEAR data
Summer 2011
Fall 2011 Spring 2012
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
891
1517 1517
549
916 931
Female Male
Summer 2011
Fall 2011 Spring 20120
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
105 92 62
1335
2341 2386
Full-time Part-time
68
Non-degree Seeking Students: Race/Ethnicity
Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
24 62 6231 38 4113 19 18
351
604 616
838
1418 1418
6 23 220 3 2
177266 269
American Indian Asian Black HispanicWhite 2 or more Non-Resident Alien Unknown
Source: HED DEAR data
69
Non-degree Seeking Students: Credit Load
Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
935
12171314
400
822 793
77180 171
16122 108
1292 62
LESS THAN 3 3 TO 5.9 6 TO 7.9 8 TO 11.9 12 OR MORE
Source: HED DEAR data
70
Non-degree Seeking Students:Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment and Age Group Fall 2011
PSYC
HUDV
READ
NURS
MART
OFTC
BIOL
MATH
ENGL
HPER
0 500 1000 1500
278
287
299
306
330
332
403
915
1039
1249
Ages 18 to 34
CULA
MART
OFTC
BIOL
NURS
EDUC
EXSC
ENGL
MATH
HPER
0 200 400 600 8001000
108
110
115
134
153
153
154
192
203
847
Ages 35 to 54
PHOT
ENGL
MUSC
SPAN
SCUL
DRPT
CLAY
WOOD
MART
HPER
0 500 1000 1500
55
56
56
62
62
68
72
94
119
1265
Ages 55 and older
Source: HED DEAR data
Courses students enroll in are different between those that are 55 years or older and younger
71
Credit Students:Dual Credit / High School Students
72
By Gender By Race/Ethnicity
Dual Credit / High School Students
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 – 342 students
49% 51%
Female Male
Hispan
ic
Whi
te
Amer
ican
Indi
an
Unkno
wn
Two
or M
ore
Races
Asian
Black
Non-R
esid
ent A
lien
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%39%
33%
12% 11%
2% 1% 1% 1%
73
Dual Credit / High School Students:School of Origin
Source: HED DEAR data
Academ
y fo
r Tec
h
Alam
ogor
do Sen
ior H
igh S
choo
l
Capita
l Hig
h Sch
ool
Caree
r Aca
demy
Deser
t Aca
demy
GED
Mon
te D
el S
ol C
harte
r
NM S
choo
l for
the
Arts C
harte
r
Saint M
ichae
ls Hig
h Sch
ool
Santa
Fe
Comm
unity S
choo
l
Santa
Fe
High S
choo
l
Santa
Fe
India
n Sch
ool
Santa
Fe
Prep
Santa
Fe
Secon
dary
Santa
Fe
Waldor
f
The
Mas
ters
Pro
gram
Tier
ra E
ncanta
da Char
ter
Tuto
rial S
choo
l0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
28
2
2414
2 112 7
17
1
36 41
5 1 1
145
2 3
Fall 2011 – 342 students
74
Dual Credit / High School Students:Major Declaration Status
Source: HED DEAR data
>0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 >9 but <12 >=120
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
33 3718 11 14
93
55
31
2327
Declared Undeclared
Fall 2011 – 342 students
75
Top 10 Subjects by Enrollment
Success Rates
Dual Credit / High School Students
Source: HED DEAR data
ENVR
ENGL
MATH
HPER
HUDV
FILM
AMSL
MART
PHYS
SPAN
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
70 63
40 43 39 35 28 28 26 23
5
16
2
College Remedial
70.5%
14.8%
14.7%
Success Non-SuccessOther
Grade Definitions: Success (A, B, C, P, IP) Non-Success (D, F, I, PR) Other (AU, W, NR)
76Credit Students:Degree Seeking Students
77
Fall 2011: Gender by Age Fall 2011: Ethnicity
Degree Seeking Students: Demographics
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 – 3,977 students
Unknown
65 AND >
55 TO 64
45 TO 54
35 TO 44
25 TO 34
18 TO 24
17 AND <
-
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
80
176
312
404
704
851
68
91
122
180
391
553
Female Male
24-F, 17-M
2-F, 2-M
64%
36%
Hispan
ic
Whi
te
Unkno
wn
Amer
ican
Indi
an
Black
Asian
Non-R
esid
ent A
lien
2 or
mor
e
Nativ
e Haw
aiia
n0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
48.0%
35.3%
8.8%
3.5% 2.0% 1.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1%
78
Degree Seeking Students:Credit Load
Source: HED DEAR data
Fall 2011 – 3,977 students
>0 but <=3 >3 but <=6 >6 but <=9 >9 but <12 >=120.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
19.5%17.5%
14.7%
8.0%
40.3%Full-time: 1,604
Part-time: 2,373
79
Fall 2011 head count of 18 to 24 year olds by credit hours attempted
Degree Seeking Students: Credit Load for 18 to 24 year olds
Full Time (12+ credit hours)
<1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 250
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
3
40
11
11494
34
116
83
5971
84
51
338
246
133
6140
19 193 1 3 1 1
25%
21%
21%
15%
8%
9%
6 or less 7 to 11 12 13 14 15+
Source: HED DEAR data
80
Degree Seeking Students:Top 20 Declared Majors
NURS
GSTD
BSAD
MART
CRJS
CULAARTS
HUSVPS
YCACCT
ECED
ENVR
TEDU
EXSC
ALEL
FLPD
DNTLPL
ST
GNSTALS
E0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
599
455
314
179142 127 126 122 119 111 103 91 89 78 70 70 67 65 63 61
Source: HED DEAR data
81
Degree Seeking Students:Top 20 Enrollments by Subject
ENGL
MATH
HPER
HUDV
READ
OFTC
MART
CULA
PSYC
BSAD
NUTR
EMSI
SPAN
ENVR
HUSV
CRJS
FILM
SPCH
FACT
HVAC 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450400
308 295
208 207
139
71 6039 33 28 26 26 25 22 21 21 20 18 18
Source: HED DEAR data
82
First-time Degree Seeking Students:School of Origin
17 or younger
18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
123 26 19 9 3 54
312
16 12 925
66
2910 4 14 9 8 2 3 1 1
Out of state HS NM HSGED or Home School Other
Source: HED DEAR data
83
First-time Degree Seeking Students:Math Enrollment
MATH 100
MATH 100X
MATH 101
MATH 102
MATH 102A
MATH 102L
MATH 109
MATH 110
MATH 119
MATH 121
MATH 135
MATH 150
MATH 155
MATH 162
MATH 180
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
33
715
41
4 4
31
81
14
2 5 2 1 1
College Level Developmental85% (143)
2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC EnrollmentSource: HED DEAR data
84
First-time Degree Seeking Students:English Enrollment
ENGL 102L ENGL 105L ENGL 107 ENGL 108 ENGL 109 ENGL 111 ENGL 112 ENGL 120 ENGL 2160
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
4 6
3553
40
77
8 2 5
College Level Developmental
60% (138)
2012 Local High School Graduates and Fall 2012 SFCC EnrollmentSource: HED DEAR data
85
First-time Degree Seeking Students:Top 10 Courses by Student Enrollment
ENGL MATH READ HPER HUDV SOAR OFTC PSYC MART HLCR0
50
100
150
200
250
92
26
121 112
7253
29 27 17
138
143
129
College Level Developmental
Source: HED DEAR data
86 Financial Aid
87
Financial Aid Programs:Enrollments
Loan Lottery PELL Scholarship Work-study0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
698
22
1,039
237
86
826
287
1,464
489
202
Halftime Fulltime
Halftime = 2,082 Fulltime = 3,268 Total = 5,350
(Includes duplicates as students may receive more than one type of aid)Source: Banner
88
Financial Aid Programs:Awards
Work-study
Scholarship
PELL
Lottery
Loan
$0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000
$488,920
$416,690
$5,397,674
$184,497
$4,836,407
$149,474
$129,663
$2,050,441
$10,407
$3,470,939
Halftime Fulltime
$638,394 total work-study
$546,353 total scholar-ships (excluding Lottery)
$7,448,115total PELL grants
$194,904total Lottery scholarships
$8,307,346 total loans
Source: Banner
89
Financial Aid Programs:Funding Source(s)
99.6% of loans are federally funded The remainder are state (0.3%) and private (0.1%)
100% of Lottery scholarships are state funded 100% of PELL grants are federally funded Other scholarships and work-study: (Below)
Work-study
Scholarship
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
13.5%
1.5%
54.5%
53.9%
32.0%
41.6%1.5%
1.5%
External Federal Institutional Private State
Source: Banner
90
Financial Aid Programs:Is everyone receiving aid?
Fulltime Students Halftime Students
Source: Banner
Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
78.1% 80.7% 72.7%
21.9% 19.3% 27.3%
Receiving FA No FA
1,709 stu-
dents
1,616 stu-
dents
44 stu-dents
Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
43.0% 43.5%58.7%
57.0% 56.5%41.3%
Receiving FA No FA
1,596 stu-
dents
1,696 stu-
dents
736 stu-
dents
91 Retention
92
Retention:Fall 2009 First-Time-Freshmen Full-Time Degree Seeking Students (323)
Fall 2009 Spring 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 20120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%100%
77%
56%51%
42%37%
Source: HED DEAR data
93
Retention:Fall to Fall Retention Rate: 2007-2011 AY
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
63%59% 56% 58%
53%
Source: HED DEAR data
94
Retention Cohort Tracking Study
Cohort = 552 students First Time Freshman (FTF) Degree Seeking (DS) Full-time and Part-time
Track 3 academic years (Fall 2010 – Spring 2013) Graduation numbers for Spring and
Summer 2013 not included in this report
Source: HED DEAR data
95
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Academic Year 2010-11Semester 1 Semester 2
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
65.4%
34.6%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
47.1%
23.4%
0.5%2.9%
26.1%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
StartSource: HED DEAR data
96
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Academic Year 2011-12Semester 3 Semester 4
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
25.5%
15.0%
2.2%
12.9%
44.4%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
31.5%
16.0%
2.2%
11.2%
39.1%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
Source: HED DEAR data
97
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Academic Year 2012-13Semester 5 Semester 6
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
16.7% 13.4%
3.4%
13.2%
53.3%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
12.7% 12.8%
4.0%
12.7%
57.8%
Full-time Part-time Graduated
Transferred Gone
*Graduation numbers for Spring and Summer 2013 not included in this report
Source: HED DEAR data
98
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Status Change by Semester
Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 20130%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
15% 15%
11%
16%
22%
16%
11%
13%13%
12%
Full-time to Part-time Part-time to Full-time
This is the average % of students who switched from FT to PT status (15.6%)
This is the average % of students who switched from PT to FT status (13.5%)
Source: HED DEAR data
99
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Students Who Left and Returned
Gone Transferred Gone Transferred Gone Transferred Gone Transferred0
5
10
15
20
25
30
53
1
5 5
1
9
1
16
19
1
15
2
Full-time Part-time
5.7% of semester
enrollment
8.9% of semes-ter enrollment
15.1% of se-mester enroll-
ment16.3% of se-
mester enroll-ment
Spring 2012 Fall 2012Fall 2011 Spring 2013
Source: HED DEAR data
100
Retention Cohort Tracking Study:Enrollment: SCH grouping by semester
Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 20130
100
200
300
400
500
600
361
260
174141
92 70
38
27
20
13
1415
58
44
30
40
3023
49
41
25
22
1316
46
17
13
8
1717
>=12 >9 but <12 >6 but <=9 >3 but <=6 >0 but <=3
552
389
262224
166141
10.5%
6.9%
65.4%
8.9%
8.3%
4.4%10.5%
11.3%
6.9%
66.9%
5.0%9.5%
11.5%7.6%
66.4%
3.6%9.8%
17.9%5.8%
62.9%
10.3%7.8%
18.1%8.4%
55.4%
12.1%11.3%16.3%10.6%
49.7%
Source: HED DEAR data
101SFCC Students Transferring Out
102
Do Students Who Transfer From SFCC Stay at Their New 2-Year Institutions?
CNM UNM Branch
NMSU Branch
LCC ENMU Branch
SJC CCC NMJC IAIA MCC0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450422
110
68
41 38 3120 18
5 3
134
4028 27 18
5
33 34
7 3
Stayed Returned
Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse
103
Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 2-Year Institution Full- or Part-Time?
MCC
IAIA
SJC
NMJC
CCC
ENMU Branch
LCC
NMSU Branch
UNM Branch
CNM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
6
7
24
47
48
48
51
63
126
395
5
12
5
5
8
17
33
24
161
Part-timeFull-time
Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse
104
What Happens to SFCC Students Who Transfer to 4-Year Institutions?
UNM NNMC NMHU NMSU NM Tech ENMU WNMU0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
603
187158
114
34 27 18
340
156 169
5227 13 5
Stayed Returned
Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse
105
Are SFCC Students Who Transfer to a 4-Year Institution Full-or Part-Time?
WNMU
ENMU
NM Tech
NMSU
NMHU
NNMC
UNM
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
5
11
36
111
95
71
515
18
29
25
55
232
272
428
Part-timeFull-time
Source: HED DEAR data, National Student Clearinghouse
106
Future for the Transfer Students:Higher Education Center (HEC)
HEC – a model higher education consortium focused on bringing affordable, accessible bachelor’s completion and graduate degrees to Santa Fe and surrounding communities
Founding four-year partner institutions: University of New Mexico NM Highlands University Institute of American Indian Arts NM State University will become the fourth partner in Fall 2013
On-campus pilot program started in Fall 2011 Currently, bachelor’s and master’s degree programs in: business,
communications, criminal justice, dental hygiene, education, medical laboratory sciences, nursing, radiologic sciences, social work, technology and training, university studies
Facility to house the HEC at the former College of Santa Fe Campus is scheduled to open in Fall 2014
107 Graduation
108
Graduation:What is Our Graduation Rate?
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
8%11% 9%
11%
6%
2%
12%
7%
11%
5%
17%
25%
22%23%
Overall Graduation Rate Hispanic Graduation Rate Transfer Rate
Source: HED DEAR data
109
Graduation:How do we compare statewide?
CNMCCC
ENMU -
R
ENMU -
RuiLC
CMCC
NMJC
NMMI
NMSU A
NMSU C
NMSU D
A
NMSU G SJC
SFCC
UNM G
UNM LA
UNM T
UNM V
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
8%4%
16%12%
22%
32%
15%
28%
7%4%
12%
25%
14%
6% 8% 9%13%
8%
Graduation Rate Transfer Rate
16th out of 19th
Source: IPEDS data
110
Graduation:Number of Certificates and Associate Degrees Awarded
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120
100
200
300
400
500
600
167 146 143180 195
198201 200
276
336
Hispanic Non-Hispanic
Source: HED DEAR data
111
Graduation:Origin of Completers
39%
61%
Started at SFCC
Source: HED DEAR data
112
Graduation:Median Number of Semesters Enrolled Prior to Completion
FTF Transfer FTF Transfer FTF TransferCertificate < 1 Certificate 1+ Associate's
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
6
2
6
4
10
7
Source: HED DEAR data
113
Graduation:Awards by College and Fiscal Year
Arts and Design
Business, Education, and
Professional Studies
Health and Sciences
Liberal Arts and Core Studies
Trades and Technology
FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY1112 FY0910 FY1011 FY11120
50
100
150
200
250
300
87% 59% 77%
58%48%
53%
59%
60%49%
81% 84% 93%50%
49% 50%13% 41% 23%
42%
52%47%
41%
40%
51%
19%16%
8%
50%
51% 50%
Associate Certificate
23 29 31
189
272 281
98
149 139
43 51 4028
53 50
Source: HED DEAR data
114
Why Graduation Matters
61% of our credit students say they want to earn a degree
58% of jobs in New Mexico will require some form of postsecondary education or training by 2018
87% of our students who fill out the FAFSA are Pell eligible
Our average annual student loan amount is $6,500
Only 6% graduate within 3 years
115
What do the students have to say?• Survey of Entering Student Engagement -SENSE• Community College Survey of Student Engagement –
CCSSE• Student Satisfaction Inventory - Noel-Levitz
Student Experience
116
SENSE and CCSSE
The more actively engaged students are early in their college experience, the more likely they are to learn and to achieve their academic goals.
1. Early Connections2. High Expectations and aspirations3. Clear academic plan and pathway4. Effective track to college readiness5. Engaged learning 6. Academic and social support network
117
SENSE Overview
Look at experiences reported by nearly 75,000 entering students Community colleges
172 institutions 35 states
When is the survey administered? The survey is administered during the fourth and fifth class weeks of the
fall academic term. How is the survey administered?
SENSE is administered as a pencil-and-paper survey in randomly selected classes drawn from a specific group of courses provided in the course schedule file (CSF).
Could you give an example of what is meant by first college-level English and Math courses? First college-level English and Math courses are generally those offered
to first-time college-ready students that did not place into developmental courses. Examples include Comp I and Algebra I.
Source: SENSE
118
SENSE:Benchmarks
Early Connections High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning Academic and Social Support Network
All Students
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
51.6
49
51.2 50.9
48
50.3
56
50.6
53.5
49.9
51.1 51.2
50 50 50 50 50 50
Your College Small Colleges 2010 Cohort
Source: SENSE
119
SENSE:Part time and full time students
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Part
-Tim
e S
tudents
42 47 52 57
50.5
49.4
50.4
49.7
46.5
48.7
54.5
51
52.7
49
48.3
49.1
50.3
50.7
50.1
49.4
47.6
48.5
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Full-T
ime S
tudents
42444648505254565860
55.8
47.9
53.8
55
53.4
56.1
58.2
49.5
54.5
51
55.4
54
53.5
49.1
51.9
50.7
54.3
52.9
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Source: SENSE
120
SENSE:Developmental and Non-Developmental
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Dev
elop
men
tal S
tude
nts
42 47 52 57
56.7
49.8
57.2
59.7
52.5
54.5
57.4
50.4
54.4
55.7
52.4
51.1
53.2
50.1
52
55.8
51.8
50.3
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Non-D
evelo
pm
enta
l Stu
dents
35 40 45 50 55 60
45.7
47.7
43.5
39.7
43.6
46.5
54
50.7
51.9
38.2
48.5
51.5
48.5
49.7
48.7
36.4
46.8
50.1
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Source: SENSE
121
SENSE:Male and Female Students
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Male
Stu
dents
35 40 45 50 55 60
49.7
41.3
47.3
44.9
45.6
43.2
56.8
46.6
54
49.4
50
49.4
52.5
46.2
51.5
49.1
48.8
48.9
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Fem
ale
Stu
dents
42444648505254565860
53.3
55.6
54.4
56
50
56.3
55.4
53.8
53.4
50.3
52.1
52.8
50.7
53.5
50.5
50.5
51.3
51.6
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Source: SENSE
122
SENSE:White and Hispanic Students
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Mal
e W
hite
Stu
dent
s
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
61.5
48.1
60.5
29.9
32.1
26.1
57.3
47.2
54.9
48.1
48.4
50.1
51.2
46.4
51.1
46.3
47
49.2
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Early Connections
High Expectations and Aspirations
Clear Academic Plan and Pathway
Effective Track to College Readiness
Engaged Learning
Academic and Social Support Network
Male
His
panic
, La
tino, Spanis
h S
tudents
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
48.3
36.6
44.3
48.6
51.5
49.8
58.1
44.8
54.2
53.1
48.9
48.1
53.4
45.3
51.5
53.1
47.9
48.3
2010 Cohort Small Colleges Your College
Source: SENSE
123
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)
Source: SENSE
CCSSE asks questions that assess institutional practices and student behaviors that are correlated highly with student learning and student retention.
124
CCSSE:Benchmarks
Source: SENSE
125
CCSSE:Aspects of Highest Student Engagement
Source: SENSE
126
CCSSE:Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement
Source: SENSE
127
Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory
Source: Noel-Levitz 2010 Student Satisfaction Inventory
SFCC All
Students
National Communi
ty Colleges
Rate your overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far.
5.81 5.46
1 = Not satisfied at all 0% 1%
2 = Not very satisfied 1% 2%
3 = Somewhat dissatisfied 3% 5%
4 = Neutral 9% 11%
5 = Somewhat satisfied 12% 17%
6 = Satisfied 48% 41%
7 = Very satisfied 26% 19%
SFCC EMPLOYEES
129 Employee Demographics
130
Employee Demographics:Staff/Admin Diversity by Gender
Staff = 247 Administration = 20
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
61.5%
38.5%
Female Male
85.0%
15.0%
Female Male
131
Employee Demographics:Faculty Diversity by Gender
Regular Faculty = 67 Adjunct Faculty = 276
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
52.2%47.8%
Female Male
39.1%
60.9%
Female Male
132
Employee Demographics:Staff Diversity by Ethnicity
Staff = 247 Administration = 20
Unknown
2 or more
White
Native Hawaiian
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
-30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%
0.4%
1.6%
40.9%
0.4%
51.8%
1.2%
1.2%
2.5%
Unknown
2 or more
White
Native Hawaiian
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%
85.0%
15.0%
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
133
Employee Demographics:Faculty Diversity by Ethnicity
Regular Faculty = 67 Adjunct Faculty = 276
Unknown
2 or more
White
Native Hawaiian
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
-30.0% 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%
0.0%
0.0%
77.6%
0.0%
20.9%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Unknown
2 or more
White
Native Hawaiian
Hispanic
Black
Asian
American Indian
0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 90.0%
4.0%
0.7%
75.0%
0.3%
16.3%
0.7%
1.5%
1.5%
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
134
Employee Demographics:Staff Counts by Position and Status
Service
Sales and Related
Production, Transportation, and Material Moving
Offica and Administrative Support
Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance
Management
Library and Instructional Support
Computer, Engineering, and Science
Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media
Business and Financial Operations
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
21
1
0
8
0
0
7
1
7
2
46
1
3
55
8
46
34
17
19
38
Full-time Part-time
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
135
Employee Demographics:Average Salary: Full-Time Staff
Service
Sales and Related
Production, Transportation, and Material Moving
Office and Administrative Support
Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance
Management
Libraray and Instructional Support
Computer, Engineering, and Science
Community Service, Legal, Arts, and Media
Business and Financial Operations
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000
$29,058
$22,880
$36,114
$33,645
$38,353
$84,854
$45,801
$48,822
$43,792
$47,108
Overall average salary = $46,958
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
136
Employee Demographics:Regular Faculty Salary Schedule
Maximum of seven years related experience will be given to determine entry salary. Current faculty will advance one step at the completion of each contract to a maximum of 7 steps.
It is the responsibility of the faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at
the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at the Bachelor level. Faculty members are responsible to providing official transcripts to the Office of Human
Resources when there is a change in degree. All adjustments to pay will only affect the contract subsequent to the one in which proof is
supplied.
REGULAR STATUS FACULTY
(9 months)
STEPS Bachelor Masters MA + 45 Doctorate
1 40,484 42,103 43,788 45,539
2 41,293 42,946 44,663 46,450
3 42,120 43,804 45,556 47,379
4 42,962 44,681 46,468 48,327
5 43,821 45,574 47,397 49,293
6 44,698 46,486 48,345 50,279
7 45,591 47,415 49,312 51,285
Source: Human Resources
137
Employee Demographics:Average Salary: Regular Faculty
Assistant Professor
Associate Professor
Professor
$44,000 $48,000 $52,000 $56,000
$48,790
$52,354
$53,808
Overall average salary = $50,260
4 regular faculty
22 regular faculty
41 regular faculty
Source: IPEDS – Human Resources Report 2012-2013
138
Employee Demographics:Adjunct Faculty Salary Schedule
Adjunct Faculty are hired on a semester-by-semester basis and have “temporary” status. Pay hours equal the combination of lecture and lab/studio hours included in the course credit hours taught.
Lecture hours are compensated at a rate of 1 pay hour per scheduled lecture hour. Lab hours are compensated at a rate of .75 pay hours per scheduled lab/studio hour. Nursing clinical lab courses are compensated at a rate of 3 pay hours per scheduled lab hour.
It is the responsibility of the adjunct faculty member to provide official transcripts for proof of degrees at the time of hiring. Absent proof, pay will be calculated at Level I, Baccalaureate.
Adjunct Faculty members are responsible for providing official transcripts to the Human Resources department when there is a change in degree level.
All adjustments to pay levels will only affect the semesters subsequent to the one in which proof is supplied.
Accumulated pay hours which result in a move to the next highest pay level will be used to calculate the rate of pay for subsequent semester Adjunct Faculty Contracts.
Full-time faculty teaching summer or overloads begin at Level II unless a higher level has been attained in an Adjunct capacity, in which case, compensation will be at that level held; movement to Level IV will occur after three years of full time instructor employment at SFCC.
Only adjunct teaching hours earned at Santa Fe Community College count toward the determination of an adjunct faculty member’s salary schedule pay level.
SFCC Teaching Experience
Degree Attainment
Baccalaureate Masters
Master's +45
Doctorat
e
Level I (0-24 Pay Hrs) $659 $669 $678 $690 Level II (25-48 Pay Hrs) $699 $709 $719 $731 Level III (49-72 Pay Hrs) $740 $752 $762 $775 Level IV ( 73+ Pay Hrs) $784 $795 $809 $820
Source: Human Resources
139
Employee Demographics:Highest Degree Level: Faculty
Regular Faculty Adjunct Faculty
No Deg
ree
Certifi
cate
s
Assoc
iate
s
Bache
lors
Teac
her L
icens
ures
Maste
rs
Prof
essio
nal D
octo
rate
s
Docto
rate
s0
20
40
60
80
100
120
4 1 07
0
46
0
11
No Deg
ree
Certifi
cate
s
Assoc
iate
s
Bache
lors
Teac
her L
icens
ures
Maste
rs
Prof
essio
nal D
octo
rate
s
Docto
rate
s0
20
40
60
80
100
120
96
05
56
1
91
2
19
Source: Banner
140 Employee Engagement
141
Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction
Source: Noel Levitz
208-239 Respondents 45% of All Full-Time Employees 18% of All Part-Time Employees
Comparable to Responses of Previous 2 Years 43% Faculty 49% Staff 7.6% Administrators
Compared with 23 2-Yr Institutions 16 Different States Largely Western and Mid-Western With Employees of Similar Years of Service and
Faculty/Staff/Admin. Makeup
142
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty
3.19 3.38 3.70 3.02 3.12
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs ofits adjunct faculty
2.92 3.00 2.91 2.79 n/a
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff
3.09 3.15 3.21 3.09 3.14
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators
3.61 3.63 4.58 3.56 3.79
Source: Noel Levitz
143
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Faculty take pride in their work
3.89 3.81 3.91 3.84 3.94
Staff take pride in their work 3.68 3.59 3.52 3.65 3.75
Administrators take pride in their work
3.58 3.52 3.63 3.54 3.69
Source: Noel Levitz
144
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)Question (scale 1-5) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution
2.96 2.98 3.14 2.80 3.01
There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution
3.10 3.06 3.09 2.90 3.08
I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills
3.49 3.27 3.20 3.11 3.01
Source: Noel Levitz
145
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Importance Relative To SatisfactionSource: Noel Levitz
Question (scale 1-5)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty
4.40 3.38 4.42 3.70 4.53 3.02 4.40 3.12
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its Adjunct faculty
4.34 3.00 4.26 2.91 4.52 2.79 NA NA
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of staff
4.43 3.15 4.40 3.21 4.48 3.09 4.35 3.14
The institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators
4.21 3.63 4.04 4.58 4.09 3.56 4.18 3.79
146
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Source: Noel Levitz
Importance Relative To Satisfaction
Question(scale 1-5)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Faculty take pride in their work
4.66 3.81 4.65 3.91 4.74 3.84 4.68 3.94
Staff take pride in their work
4.59 3.59 4.61 3.52 4.65 3.65 4.68 3.94
Administrators take pride in their work
4.61 3.52 4.79 3.63 4.64 3.54 4.62 3.44
147
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Source: NMDWS LASER
Importance Relative To Satisfaction
Question (scale 1-5)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance
Satisfaction
Employee suggestions are used to improve the institution
4.19 2.98 4.29 3.14 4.27 2.80 4.27 3.01
There is a spirit of teamwork and cooperation at the institution
4.47 3.06 4.71 3.09 4.59 2.90 4.56 3.08
I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills
4.44 3.27 4.15 3.20 4.36 3.11 4.38 3.01
148
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Source: Noel Levitz
Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND
POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011
ImportanceSatisfacti
on GAPImportan
ceSatisfactio
n GAPImportanc
eSatisfacti
on GAPImportan
ceSatisfacti
on GAP
Effective Lines of Communications 4.45 2.56 1.89 4.78 2.74 2.04 4.54 2.55 1.99 4.41 2.82 1.59
Following Clear Processes 4.44 2.91 1.53 4.38 2.73 1.65 4.47 2.74 1.73 4.39 2.94 1.44
Teamwork and Cooperation 4.47 3.06 1.41 4.71 3.09 1.62 4.59 2.90 1.69 4.51 3.08 1.43
Consistency in Training New Employees 4.41 3.05 1.36 4.48 2.77 1.71 4.41 2.92 1.49 4.38 2.93 1.45
Good Communication Between Staff and Faculty 4.38 2.96 1.42 4.54 3.00 1.54 4.48 3.00 1.48 4.45 3.07 1.37
Planning Effectively 4.57 2.97 1.60 4.72 3.42 1.30 4.63 3.09 1.54 4.39 3.18 1.20Sharing of Information Between Administrators and Staff 4.45 3.03 1.42 4.74 3.26 1.48 4.43 3.00 1.42 4.45 3.08 1.37
Good Communication Between Faculty and Administration 4.40 3.05 1.35 4.48 3.13 1.35 4.54 2.94 1.60 4.40 3.04 1.36
Clearly Written Procedures 4.34 2.91 1.43 4.35 2.95 1.40 4.36 2.95 1.41 4.29 3.04 1.24
Clear Processes for Recognition of Achievement 4.27 2.88 1.38 4.13 2.91 1.22 4.27 2.67 1.61 4.28 2.97 1.31
149
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Source: Noel Levitz
Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011
Importance
Satisfaction GAP
Importance Satisfaction GAP
Importance
Satisfaction GAP
Importance
Satisfaction GAP
Employee Involvement in Planning 4.35 3.04 1.31 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 2.86 1.60 4.22 3.00 1.22
Leadership Displaying a Clear Sense of Purpose 4.68 3.44 1.24 4.88 3.46 1.42 4.63 3.21 1.42 4.51 3.43 1.08
Sufficiently Utilizing Budetary Resources 4.52 3.09 1.43 4.58 3.46 1.12 4.51 3.14 1.38 4.42 3.29 1.14
Doing a Good Job Meeting Staff Needs 4.43 3.15 1.28 4.40 3.21 1.19 4.48 3.09 1.39 4.35 3.14 1.22
Utilizing Employee Suggestions for Improvements 4.19 2.98 1.21 4.29 3.14 1.15 4.27 2.80 1.48 4.27 3.01 1.26
Meeting the Needs of Students 4.80 3.51 1.29 4.80 3.54 1.26 4.76 3.52 1.24 4.63 3.69 0.94
Utilizing Staff Resources Appropriately 4.40 3.13 1.27 4.46 3.46 1.00 4.40 2.98 1.42 4.31 3.20 1.11
Treating Students as a Top Priority 4.78 3.52 1.26 4.80 3.63 1.17 4.75 3.62 1.14 4.64 3.68 0.96
Taking Pride in Administrative Work 4.61 3.52 1.09 4.79 3.63 1.16 4.64 3.54 1.10 4.60 3.69 0.91
Meeting the Needs of Faculty 4.40 3.38 1.02 4.42 3.70 0.72 4.53 3.02 1.51 4.40 3.12 1.28
150
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2007-2011 (continued)
Source: Noel Levitz
Gap Between Importance and SatisfactionCAMPUS CULTURE AND POLICIES 2008 2009 2010 2011
Importance
Satisfaction GAP
Importance
Satisfaction GAP
Importance
Satisfaction
GAP
Importance
Satisfaction
GAP
Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Understood 4.38 3.35 1.03 4.44 3.38
1.06 4.36 3.14
1.22 4.34 3.34
1.00
Making Certain the Mission, Purpose and Values are Supported 4.44 3.46 0.98 4.60 3.42
1.18 4.44 3.31
1.13 4.30 3.48
0.83
Promoting Excellent Student Employee Relationships 4.66 3.56 1.09 4.76 3.67
1.09 4.64 3.57
1.07 4.59 3.68
0.91
Making Certain the Staff Takes Pride in Their Work 4.59 3.59 1.00 4.61 3.521.09 4.65 3.65
1.00 4.62 3.75
0.86
Insuring Efforts to Improve Quality are Paying Off 4.45 3.45 1.00 4.50 3.640.86 4.41 3.27
1.14 4.45 3.47
0.98
Insuring the Goals of the Institution are Consistent With the Mission 4.53 3.48 1.06 4.56 3.71
0.85 4.51 3.42
1.09 4.39 3.49
0.90
Insuring the Faculty Takes Pride in Their Work 4.66 3.81 0.85 4.65 3.910.74 4.74 3.84
0.90 4.68 3.94
0.74
Insuring the Reputation of the Institution Continues to Improve 4.49 3.62 0.87 4.63 4.00
0.63 4.57 3.65
0.92 4.48 3.85
0.63
Insuring the Institution is Well-Respected in the Community 4.63 3.74 0.89 4.67 4.00
0.67 4.70 3.88
0.82 4.63 4.08
0.55
Insuring the Institution Does a Good Job of Meeting the Needs of Administrators 4.21 3.63 0.57 4.04 4.58
-0.54 4.09 3.56
0.53 4.18 3.79
0.39
151
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary)
Source: Noel Levitz
SFCC is statistically above the comparison group in 2011 in five areas:
This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of administrators SFCC = 3.79 vs. Comparison Group = 3.66*
The reputation of this institution continues to improve SFCC = 3.85 vs. Comparison Group = 3.52*
This institution is well-respected in the community SFCC = 4.08 vs. Comparison Group = 3.67*
*Statistically Significant
152
Noel-Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2011 (summary)
Source: Noel Levitz
I am paid fairly for the work I do: SFCC = 2.67 vs. Comparison Group = 3.24*
The employee benefits available to me are valuable: SFCC = 3.45 vs. Comparison Group = 3.85*
I have adequate opportunities for advancement: SFCC = 2.66 vs. Comparison Group = 3.12*
I have adequate opportunities for training to improve my skills: SFCC = 3.01 vs. Comparison Group = 3.44*
I have adequate opportunities for professional development: SFCC = 3.03 vs. Comparison Group = 3.45*
SFCC is statistically below the comparison group in 2011 in five areas:
*Statistically Significant
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
154 SFCC Organizations
155
Current SFCC Organizational Chart
156
Proposed Reorganization: Academic Affairs
157
Quality Councils
Administrative and
College Services
Institutional
Advancement
Societal
Responsibilit
y
Student
Success &
Academic
Affairs
Marketing and
PR
SocialResponsibility
158
Service to the Community
Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations
159 Previous Strategic Plan
160
Previous Strategic Plan: Institutional Goals
1. Develop Students’ Potential through Highly Effective Learning Systems
2. Identify & Meet the Community’s Learning Needs
3. Engage Employees in Workplace Success4. Provide Effective Internal Organizational
Support5. Promote External Support for the College6. Promote Institutional Accountability
161
Previous Strategic Plan: Accomplishments
Passed $35 million bond The Higher Education Center was begun on campus New construction and renovations
Health and Sciences Center was completed in 2010 Trades and Advanced Technology Center was completed
in 2011 More than 25 new certificate and degree programs
developed since 2005 Credit Hour Enrollment increased 40.7% (2007-2011) Degree completion has increased:
All completers by 45.5% (2007-2011) Hispanic completers by 16.8% (2007-2011)
162 Institutional Finance
163
SFCC Proposed Budget FY 2013-2014
Revenues Expenditures
79% of funding comes from taxesSource: Finance and Administration – Instruction & General Budget FY 12-13 and
FY 13-14
Tuiti
on &
Fees
Stat
e App
ropr
iatio
ns
Loca
l App
ropr
iatio
ns
Other
Sou
rces
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
20.0%29.0%
50.0%
1.0%$6,575,300
$9,177,900
$15,900,000
$295,000In
stru
ctio
n
Acade
mic
Supp
ort
Stud
ent S
ervi
ces
Inst
itutio
nal S
uppo
rt
Plan
t Ope
ratio
n0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
47%
8%12%
21%12%
$14,317,762
$2,488,363
$3,785,955
$6,329,470
$3,733,504
164
Tuition and Fees
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
$0.00
$200.00
$400.00
$600.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$1,200.00
$1,400.00
$240.00
$387.60$474.00
$312.00
$516.00
$618.09$576.00
$930.00
$1,176.00
Full-time tuition for 12 credit hours per semester
In District Out of District Out of State
Source: Banner
165
Tuition Statewide: By Academic Year
Source: IPEDS
NM Mili
tary
Inst
itute
NMSU – A
lam
ogor
do
NMSU – G
rant
s
UNM –
Taos
UNM –
Gallu
p
UNM –
Los Ala
mos
UNM –
Valen
cia
Mesal
ands
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
NMSU – D
ona
Ana
East
ern
NMU – R
oswel
l
Sant
a Fe
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
CNM Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
San
Juan
Col
lege
New M
exico
Juni
or C
olle
ge
Clovi
s Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
NMSU – C
arlsb
ad
Luna
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
East
ern
NMU – R
uido
so$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
$4,030
$1,896$1,782$1,704$1,704$1,608$1,561$1,560$1,536$1,507
$1,329$1,310$1,224$1,176$1,176$1,036
$886 $852
166
Instruction and General
2008-2014
Projected Prelim.Budget2008 2009 2010 2011 2012* 2013 2014
Beginning Balance 3,124,785$ 3,820,502$ 2,750,801$ 3,439,136$ 4,962,743$ 7,663,288$ 4,616,982$
Revenues 28,182,950 28,380,598 28,994,287 30,271,016 31,860,462 31,218,900 32,082,900 Exenditures 25,865,718 27,374,563 26,905,952 27,777,887 29,159,917 30,665,206 30,913,966 Net 2,317,232$ 1,006,035$ 2,088,335$ 2,493,129$ 2,700,545$ 553,694$ 1,168,934$
Transfers 1,621,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 1,800,000 - 3,600,000 2,100,000
Ending Balance 3,820,502$ 2,750,801$ 3,439,136$ 4,132,265$ 7,663,288$ 4,616,982$ 3,685,916$
15% 10% 13% 15% 26% 15% 12%
SFCCInstruction and General2008 to Budgeted 2014
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
167
Instructional Cost per Student
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12$1,500
$1,750
$2,000
$2,250
$2,500
$2,240
$2,131
$1,770$1,740
$2,105
Source: Balanced Scorecard
168
Statement of Net Assets – 2008 to 2012
Source: Moody Presentation
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Current Assets $38,426,511 $36,426,472 $39,801,371 $42,530,782 $29,084,797
Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873
Total Assets $93,495,589 $93,367,566 $108,168,776 $121,249,630 $119,641,670
Current Liabilities $12,877,569 $9,379,047 $14,947,627 $12,530,972 $13,167,482
Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,154 31,542,599 25,281,108
Total Liabilities $32,892,631 $27,229,349 $32,072,141 $44,073,571 $38,448,590
NET ASSETS $60,602,958 $66,138,217 $76,096,635 $77,176,059 $81,193,080
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Current Assets $38,426,511 $36,426,472 $39,801,371 $42,530,782 $29,084,797
Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873
Total Assets $93,495,589 $93,367,566 $108,168,776 $121,249,630 $119,641,670
Current Liabilities $12,877,569 $9,379,047 $14,947,627 $12,530,972 $13,167,482
Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,154 31,542,599 25,281,108
Total Liabilities $32,892,631 $27,229,349 $32,072,141 $44,073,571 $38,448,590
NET ASSETS $60,602,958 $66,138,217 $76,096,635 $77,176,059 $81,193,080
169
Unrestricted Cash and Expendable Net Assets
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
170
Unrestricted Net Assets (Fund Balance) to I&G Expenditures
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
Target 30%
171
Unrestricted Cash to I&G Expenditures
Source: Moody Presentation
Target Range 35% to 39%
Target range
172
Key I&G Revenue Streams
Source: Moody Presentation
173
I&G Total Revenues
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
174
I&G Revenues/Expenditures
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
175DEBT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE PLAN
176
2013 Plan of Finance
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
District held an election in February 2010 to authorize $35 million of general obligation bonds.
Constitution limits amount of bonds outstanding to 3%.
The 2012 Assessed Valuation is as follows: $6,357,470,139 x .03 = $190,724,104.
After issuance of the 2013 Bonds, the College will be 21% bonded to capacity.
Declining debt service to permit new bonds in future without tax increase.
12 year final maturity.
Retire debt as quickly as $0.93 levy will permit.
Actively manage debt service cash and principal maturities to maintain a stable debt service tax rate and retire debt as quickly as possible.
177
Total Debt Service Requirements
Source: SFCC Finance and Administration
Principal
Year 8/1 Principal Interest Total 8/1 Principal Interest (1) Total Principal Interest Total Retired Cumulative
2013 $5,430,000 $303,344 $5,733,344 $600,000 $109,896 $709,896 $6,030,000 $413,240 $6,443,240 $6,030,000 15.0%
2014 2,000,000 444,275 2,444,275 3,300,000 509,500 3,809,500 5,300,000 953,775 6,253,775 5,300,000 28.3%
2015 3,340,000 406,525 3,746,525 1,300,000 410,500 1,710,500 4,640,000 817,025 5,457,025 4,640,000 39.8%
2016 3,900,000 339,725 4,239,725 1,000,000 371,500 1,371,500 4,900,000 711,225 5,611,225 4,900,000 52.1%
2017 3,580,000 261,725 3,841,725 1,000,000 341,500 1,341,500 4,580,000 603,225 5,183,225 4,580,000 63.5%
2018 1,700,000 181,175 1,881,175 1,000,000 311,500 1,311,500 2,700,000 492,675 3,192,675 2,700,000 70.2%
2019 2,650,000 140,800 2,790,800 1,000,000 281,500 1,281,500 3,650,000 422,300 4,072,300 3,650,000 79.3%
2020 2,485,000 74,550 2,559,550 1,000,000 251,500 1,251,500 3,485,000 326,050 3,811,050 3,485,000 88.0%
2021 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 201,500 1,201,500 1,000,000 90.5%
2022 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 151,500 1,401,500 1,250,000 93.6%
2023 1,250,000 89,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 89,000 1,339,000 1,250,000 96.8%2024 - - - 1,300,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,300,000 39,000 1,339,000 1,300,000 100.0%
$25,085,000 $2,152,119 $27,237,119 $15,000,000 $3,068,396 $18,068,396 $40,085,000 $5,220,515 $45,305,515 $40,085,000
(1) For illustrational purposes only. Interest calculated using a coupon rate of 3.58%.
PRESENT REQUIREMENTS SERIES 2013 BONDS TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
178 TAX BASE INFORMATION
179
Assessed Valuation
Source: RBC Capital Markets
Tax Growth OverYear Residential Non-Residential Total Previous Year
2003 $2,685,374,933 $1,013,674,395 $3,699,049,328 7.32%
2004 2,967,074,813 1,053,732,235 4,020,807,048 8.70%
2005 3,362,985,020 1,154,730,472 4,517,715,492 12.36%
2006 3,737,819,975 1,270,886,417 5,008,706,392 10.87%
2007 4,152,258,777 1,454,265,011 5,606,523,788 11.94%
2008 4,430,810,953 1,629,371,871 6,060,182,824 8.09%
2009 4,661,806,059 1,546,352,421 6,208,158,480 2.44%
2010 4,828,230,438 1,545,455,467 6,373,685,905 2.67%
2011 4,832,906,555 1,550,015,250 6,382,921,805 0.14%
2012 4,880,347,416 1,477,122,723 6,357,470,139 -0.40%
Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration.
As of 3/25/2013
Total Bond Authorization Approved by Voters in 2010 35,000,000$
2012 Assessed Valuation 6,357,470,139$
Constitutional Debt Limitation (3% of Assessed Valuation) 3.00% 190,724,104$
Less Current Outstanding Debt (100% Fixed Rate) 25,085,000
Less Series 2013 Bonds 15,000,000
Debt Outstanding After Issuance of Series 2013 Bonds 40,085,000$
Available Debt Capacity 150,639,104$
% Bonded to Capacity 21.02%
History of Assessed Valuation
$3,000,000,000
$3,500,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$5,000,000,000
$5,500,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$6,500,000,000
$7,000,000,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-1.00%
1.00%
3.00%
5.00%
7.00%
9.00%
11.00%
13.00%
15.00%
Total AV % Growth Average Growth
180
New vs. Re-Appraisal
Source: RBC Capital Markets
2011 New (1) Re-Appraisal (1) 2012
Santa Fe - C In 2,667,575,697$ 15,176,491$ 0.57% 17,321,210$ 0.65% 2,700,073,398$ 1.22%
Santa Fe - C Out 2,165,330,858$ 20,113,278$ 0.93% 8,134,875$ 0.38% 2,193,579,011$ 1.30%
Total Residential 4,832,906,555$ 35,289,769$ 0.73% 25,456,085$ 0.53% 4,893,652,409$ 1.26%
Santa Fe - C In 979,632,876$ 16,927,938$ 1.73% (74,440,388)$ -7.60% 922,120,426$ -5.87%
Santa Fe - C Out 474,262,221$ 18,620,947$ 3.93% (67,001,426)$ -14.13% 425,881,742$ -10.20%
Total Non-Residential 1,453,895,097$ 35,548,885$ 2.45% (141,441,814)$ -9.73% 1,348,002,168$ -7.28%
Total Assessor's Valuation 6,286,801,652$ 70,838,654$ 1.13% (115,985,729)$ -1.84% 6,241,654,577$ -0.72%
Central Assesment 96,120,153$ 97,430,826 1.36%
TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION 6,382,921,805$ 70,838,654$ 1.13% (115,985,729)$ -1.84% 6,339,085,403$ (2) -0.69%
1) Numbers taken from Santa Fe County PTD-03 Report dated 6/15/2012.
2) Preliminary, does not include protested property. Final assessed value will differ.
SANTA FE COUNTYNEW vs. RE-APPRAISAL
SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
181
Major Taxpayers
Source: RBC Capital Markets
2012 % of Name Business A.V. A.V.
Public Service Company of NM Electric Utility $43,485,485 0.68%
CenturyLink Telephone Utility 15,094,348 0.24%
Eldorado Partnership Hotel 14,372,973 0.23%
La Posada Inc Hotel 10,236,788 0.16%
Santa Fe Mall LLC Shopping Center 10,120,197 0.16%
Gas Company of New Mexico Gas Utility 9,888,964 0.16%
Santa Fe Railyard Community Co Real Estate 9,398,069 0.15%
Canyon Encantado Real Estate 8,941,923 0.14%
Corporation de la Fonda Hotel 8,640,232 0.14%
New Mexico Hotels Ltd. Hotel 8,098,894 0.13%
Total $138,277,873 2.18%
Source: Santa Fe County Assessor's Office
2.18%
97.82%
Major Taxpayers
182
Direct and Overlapping Debt
Source: RBC Capital Markets
Assessed G/O Debt PercentMunicipal Entity Valuation Outstanding Applicable Amount
State of New Mexico $54,490,961,619 $372,700,000 11.67% $43,482,975
Santa Fe County 6,896,495,216 114,445,000 92.18% 105,500,062
City of Santa Fe 3,710,979,288 26,510,000 100.00% 26,510,000
Santa Fe Community College 6,357,470,139 40,085,000 100.00% 40,085,000
Santa Fe Public Schools 6,357,470,139 178,075,000 100.00% 178,075,000
Total Direct & Overlapping Debt $393,653,037
Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Assessed Valuation: 6.19%
Ratio of Estimated Direct & Overlapping Debt to 2012 Actual Valuation: 2.03%
Per Capita Direct & Overlapping Debt: $3,149.22
Est. Population: 125,000
183
Historical Tax Rates: City of Santa Fe
Source: NM Department of Finance & Administration
2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09
State of New Mexico $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000Santa Fe County 5.022 4.891 4.697 4.670 4.507Santa Fe Community College 2.362 2.299 2.205 2.190 2.114City of Santa Fe 1.165 1.135 1.093 1.097 1.055Santa Fe Schools 0.128 0.125 0.120 0.119 0.115 Total $8.677 $8.450 $8.115 $8.076 $7.791
2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09
State of New Mexico $1.360 $1.362 $1.530 $1.150 $1.250Santa Fe County 1.640 1.851 1.873 1.930 1.969Santa Fe Community College 0.930 1.015 1.015 1.046 1.046City of Santa Fe 0.564 0.743 0.679 0.498 0.461Santa Fe Schools 6.920 6.995 6.920 6.919 6.867 Total $11.414 $11.966 $12.017 $11.543 $11.593
2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09
State of New Mexico $1.360 $1.362 $1.530 $1.150 $1.250Santa Fe County 6.662 6.742 6.570 6.600 6.476Santa Fe Community College 3.292 3.314 3.220 3.236 3.160City of Santa Fe 1.729 1.878 1.772 1.595 1.516Santa Fe Schools 7.048 7.120 7.040 7.038 6.982
Total Residential in City of Santa Fe $20.091 $20.416 $20.132 $19.619 $19.384
Total Non-Residential in City of Santa Fe $29.581 $30.123 $29.865 $29.142 $27.502
Total Residential in Unincorporated County $18.362 $18.538 $18.360 $18.024 $17.868
Total Non-Residential in Unincorporated County $26.200 $26.563 $26.618 $26.286 $25.043
Source: New Mexico Department of Finance & Administration
RESIDENTIAL TAX RATES - Per $1,000 Assessed Valuation
Within 20 Mill Limit for General Purposes
Over 20 Mill Limit - Interest, Principal, Judgment, etc.
Total Levy
184 Historical Financials
185
Revenues & Expenses – Unrestricted (Budgetary Basis)
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012
Unrestricted Revenues: Tuition and Fees -$ -$ -$ 4,840,809$ 5,179,171$ Miscellaneous Fees - - 99,701 1,424,399 1,341,221 State Government Appropriations 4,673,400 7,010,030 11,805,998 8,564,500 8,203,400 Local Government Appropriations - 6,053,699 6,404,776 15,266,308 16,730,563 Private Government Contracts/Grants - - 137,956 - - Sales and Services 2,924,689 3,252,986 3,505,955 - 144,239 Other 23,776,259 868,041 8,082,951 175,000 261,868
Total Unrestricted Revenues 31,374,348$ 17,184,756$ 30,037,337$ 30,271,016$ 31,860,462$
Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural 68,585$ 57,355$ 143,235$ -$ -$ Public Service 6,235,074 6,807,116 6,550,109 - - Student Aid, Grants & Stipends 213,843 241,502 402,979 - - Auxiliary Services 1,878,164 1,951,141 2,099,224 - - Capital Outlay 3,323,331 3,920,585 14,192,670 - - Renewal & Replacement 1,187,864 874,796 633,318 - - Retirement of indebtedness 4,799,417 5,236,172 5,961,301 - - Instruction - - - 14,276,050 14,402,925 Academic Support - - - 2,632,074 2,744,907 Student Services - - - 2,395,320 3,022,200 Institutional Support - - - 5,513,937 5,959,902 Operation and Maintenance of Plant - - - 2,960,506 3,029,983
Total Unrestricted Expenditures 17,706,278$ 19,088,667$ 29,982,836$ 27,777,887$ 29,159,917$
Net Transfers 3,288,515 2,075,736 1,400,000 (1,800,000) -
Change in Net Assets 16,956,585 171,825 1,454,501 693,129 2,700,545
Beginning, Net Assets 11,897,418 28,528,919 28,700,743 3,439,137 4,962,743
Ending, Net Assets 28,854,003$ 28,700,744$ 30,155,244$ 4,132,266$ 7,663,288$
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
Budget Comparison - Unrestricted
186
Revenues & Expenses – Restricted (Budgetary Basis)
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012
Unrestricted Revenues: Federal Government Contracts/Grants 1,904,678$ 3,843,483$ 6,998,650$ 2,521,128$ 2,602,223$ State Government Contracts/Grants 602,379 1,248,788 1,101,396 1,525,479 980,536 Local Government Contracts/Grants - 124,615 118,171 110,384 11,926 Private Government Contract/Grants 273,810 21,236 118,485 452,650 743,130 Sales and Services 1,800,112 - - - -
Total Unrestricted Revenues 4,580,979$ 5,238,122$ 8,336,702$ 4,609,641$ 4,337,815$
Unrestricted Expenditures: Student Social and Cultural -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Public Service 1,955,465 1,790,104 1,854,174 - - Internal Services 196,358 - - - - Student Aid, Grants & Stipends 2,429,156 3,448,018 6,482,528 - - Instruction - - - 3,053,102 2,812,298 Academic Support - - - 1,397,275 1,275,030 Student Services - - - 159,264 260,487 Operation and Maintenance of Plant - - - - (10,000)
Total Unrestricted Expenditures 4,580,979$ 5,238,122$ 8,336,702$ 4,609,641$ 4,337,815$
Net Transfers - - - -
Change in Net Assets - - - - -
Beginning, Net Assets - - - - -
Ending, Net Assets -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
Budget Comparison - Restricted
187
Revenues & Expenditures - Audited
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012
Operating Revenues: Tuition and Fees 3,269,608$ 3,452,731$ 4,150,500$ 4,876,173$ 3,627,481$ Government Grants/Contracts 6,971,179 9,431,362 11,543,384 12,819,871 6,776,591 Non-Government Grants/Contracts 860,510 519,545 523,956 674,395 1,007,130 Sales and Services 1,058,484 1,300,142 1,264,895 1,227,492 828,029 Auxiliary Enterprises 1,866,205 1,993,396 2,270,211 2,485,265 2,713,734 Gain/Loss on Disposal Assets - - 3,523 7,640 -
Total Unrestricted Revenues 14,025,986$ 16,697,176$ 19,756,469$ 22,090,836$ 14,952,965$
Operating Expenses: Instruction 14,562,153$ 15,318,036$ 14,924,903$ 17,394,268$ 17,215,223$ Academic Support 3,487,522 4,571,262 4,569,549 3,964,233 4,019,937 Student Services 2,835,791 2,793,355 3,005,261 2,545,204 3,282,687 Institutional Support 5,028,923 5,725,648 5,275,671 5,513,937 5,959,902 Operation and Maintenance of Plant 2,821,367 2,825,823 2,728,968 2,969,886 3,019,983 Student Activities 103,585 57,355 143,235 94,344 108,650 Student Aid 1,500,545 2,414,479 5,221,524 6,398,579 6,219,074 Public Services 8,363,825 8,565,549 8,404,283 7,529,909 7,865,839 Auxiliary Enterprises 1,878,164 1,951,141 2,099,224 2,220,157 2,753,916 Building Renewal and Replacements 834,899 539,404 633,318 185,737 807,479 Capital Outlay 401,296 75,187 84,369 3,574,655 2,339,221 Independent operations 199,844 319,032 249,278 304,483 262,068 Depreciation and amortization 2,822,478 2,854,258 3,334,720 2,987,433 3,476,468
Total Unrestricted Expenditures 44,840,392$ 48,010,529$ 50,674,303$ 55,682,825$ 57,330,447$
Operating (loss) Income (30,814,406) (31,313,353) (30,917,834) (33,591,989) (42,377,482)
Non-operating revenues (expenses) Federal Pell Grant - - - - 7,811,788 State Appropriations 15,756,280 17,097,080 17,142,678 13,209,476 12,324,428 Local Appropriations - Operating 12,495,770 13,460,020 14,559,901 15,266,308 17,364,014 Local Appropriations - Debt Service 5,727,140 6,053,699 6,404,776 6,494,343 7,139,250 General Obligation Bonds 81,990 344,541 3,087,087 - - Investment Income 697,494 256,827 40,267 56,023 (7,401) Interest expense and other related debt (609,660) (788,784) (684,895) (642,088) (759,032) Other Income 370,722 425,229 331,195 293,503 345,993 Other Expense - - (4,757) (6,152) - Loss on Disposal of Assets - - - (26,621) Net Non-Operating Revenues 34,519,736 36,848,612 40,876,252 34,671,413 44,192,419
Increase in Net Assets 3,705,330 5,535,259 9,958,418 1,079,424 1,814,937
Beginning, Net Assets 56,897,628 60,602,958 66,138,217 76,096,635 79,378,143
Ending, Net Assets 60,602,958$ 66,138,217$ 76,096,635$ 77,176,059$ 81,193,080$
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets (Primary Institution)
188
Statement of Net Assets – Assets
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012Assets:Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents 7,124,878 6,059,183 9,446,021 6,142,334 7,057,482 Cash and cash equivalents - restricted 6,792,783 7,902,123 8,684,866 6,872,177 5,057,113 Investments 20,398,273 16,903,018 16,328,457 23,391,799 9,544,890 Accounts receivable students, net 749,709 208,307 238,457 1,050,834 1,322,304 Grants and contracts receivable 1,504,329 2,333,778 1,626,347 2,810,737 2,759,177 Mill levy receivable 40,252 34,161 90,882 150,493 1,661,012 Other receivables, net 545,795 1,759,187 1,990,702 1,110,715 268,323 Due from component unit 458,681 431,050 446,420 484,492 612,079 Inventories 345,055 367,476 426,109 434,955 467,085 Prepaid expenses 466,756 428,189 523,110 82,246 335,332
Total Current Assets 38,426,511 36,426,472 39,801,371 42,530,782 29,084,797
Non-Current Assets: Assets held in escrow 127,543 127,543 127,543 127,543 127,543 Mill levy receivable - - - - 1,214,664 Capital assets, net 54,941,535 56,813,551 68,239,862 78,591,305 89,214,666
Total Non-Current Assets 55,069,078 56,941,094 68,367,405 78,718,848 90,556,873
Total Assets 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670
189
Statement of Net Assets – Liabilities
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012
Liabilities:Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 2,948,539 2,429,400 2,059,011 2,740,071 2,823,502 Contractors payable - - 2,336,981 - - Accrued liabilities 1,356,195 1,075,675 860,692 998,481 991,318 Accrued interest payable 425,231 303,833 265,656 484,797 265,019 Deferred revenue 1,153,312 787,019 893,244 2,071,304 2,328,853 Dure to primary institution - - - - - Accured compensated absences - Current 746,905 776,714 148,690 185,189 846,761 Bonds payable - Current 6,247,387 4,006,406 8,067,018 5,658,939 5,627,122 Other liabilities - - 316,335 392,191 284,907
Total Current Liabilities 12,877,569 9,379,047 14,947,627 12,530,972 13,167,482
Non-Current Liabilities: Accrued compensated absences 137,186 161,260 754,918 830,477 196,108 Bonds payable 19,877,876 17,689,042 16,369,596 30,712,122 25,085,000
Total Non-Current Liabilities 20,015,062 17,850,302 17,124,514 31,542,599 25,281,108
Total Liabilities 32,892,631 27,229,349 32,072,141 44,073,571 38,448,590
Net Assets: Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 28,816,272 35,118,103 43,803,246 42,220,244 58,502,544 Restricted, scholarship and programs 1,956,096 - - - - Restricted, debt service 6,792,783 7,598,290 8,508,070 6,537,873 6,474,118 Restricted, capital projects 17,354,173 13,822,724 13,742,326 19,979,026 5,680,173 Other - - - - 223,046 Unrestricted 5,683,634 9,599,100 10,042,993 8,438,916 10,313,199
Total Net Assets 60,602,958 66,138,217 76,096,635 77,176,059 81,193,080
Total Net Assets and Liabilities 93,495,589 93,367,566 108,168,776 121,249,630 119,641,670
Source: SFCC Audited Financial Statements
190 Funding Formula
191
State Funding FormulaPerformance Based Formula
192
What is the Base?
193
Inputs and Variables
SCHCompletion
Degrees Awarded
WorkforceIncentive
At- RiskStudents
Mill Levy
Legislative WeightingExecutive Weighting
FY 14
5%
5%
3%
2%
Not Included
Reallocated100% of Last
Year’s Performance
FY 14
48%
8%
12%
8%
Included
Reallocated15% of Last
Year’s Performance
FY 13
82.25%
1.15%
0.95%
2.15%
Included
% is not reallocated
Base
Other Funding Considerations:• ERB• Compensation
Last Year’s Weighting
Source: LFC FY 2014 Budget Recommendations Volume III
195
GROW and Grants
The GROW Foundation supports SFCC by acquiring financial resources outside of the regular SFCC revenue sources through fund-raising and grants.
Grants received in previous academic years:
Grants received 7/1/2012 to 12/31/2012: $736,808.00Total grants reported through 3/31/2013: $1,384,432.67
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
$4,941,471 $5,607,033 $5,470,771 $5,322,256 $6,467,148
196
Instruction
197 Bonds
198
Summary of 2013 Bonds
Issues Size: $15,000,000
Sale Date: April 24, 2013
Closing Date: May 16, 2013
Maturity: 2013 - 2024
Current Tax Rate: $0. 93 / $1,000 of A.V.
Future Tax Rate: Maintain tax rate at current level
2012 Assessed Valuation: $6,357,470,139
199
Overview of Series 2013 BondsIssues Size: $15,000,000
Maturity Dates: 2013 - 2024
Average Life (Years): 4.662
Ratings – Moody’s: Aa1
Total Interest: $2,227,333.33
Premium: $1,186,105.00
Net Interest: $1,041,228.33
True Interest Cost (“TIC”): 1.410%
All-In TIC: 1.524%
Purchaser: Robert W. Baird & Co., Incorporated
Red Bank, New Jersey
200
Operations and Facilities
Operations Maintenance Staff: 20 Grounds Staff:15 Total Operations managed: 367 acres, 645,000 square
footage, 7 boiler systems, 76 air conditioning units
FacilitiesHealth & Sciences Center Trades & Advanced
Technology CenterWest Wing Campus Center and Food
ServicesBookstore Culinary ClassroomsFine Arts Studios and Labs Jemez Meeting RoomsWitter Fitness Ed. Center Wastewater Plant
201 Campus Security
202
Campus Safety & Security
Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires SFCC to:
Publish an Annual Security Report (ASR) To have a public crime log Disclose crime statistics Issue timely warnings about Clery Act crimes Devise an emergency response, notification
and testing policy Compile and report fire data to the federal
government Enact policies and procedures to handle reports
of missing students
203
Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT)
Mission StatementTo train selected SFCC staff and faculty members as a Campus Community Emergency Response Team (C-CERT), which will work in cooperation with the SFCC Safety and Security team, local emergency response agencies and law enforcement, either as first responders or as backup resources, as directed by the
Incident Commander.
C-CERT is here to assist with:
Disaster Preparedness Fire Safety Evacuation Disaster Medical
Operations Light Search & Rescue
204
Service to the Community
Kids Campus KSFR radio/TV station Red Dot Gallery Planetarium Fitness Center La Familia Dental Clinic Tax Preparation Services Meeting Space for Organizations
205 Sustainability
206
What is Sustainability?
Source: NMDWS LASER
The design and implementation of systems that emulate the optimization from millions of years of evolution seen in ecosystems and the natural world. Application of this approach results in ...
Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the future
Balance the use and availability of renewable and non-renewable resources.
Reduce, re-use, and recycle human-made waste streams as a resource and manage the by-products of human endeavor.
207
Sustainability:Why should we care?
1. People2. Planet3. Learning
208
Sustainability Plans: State and City State Goal – The Renewable Energy State Support National Economic and Security Issues Cultivating Santa Fe’s Future Economy, Economic
Development Strategy (April 2004) 4. Develop curricula that helps Santa Fe become a water
and energy conservation role model for other cities.
Sustainable Santa Fe Plan – adopted October 29, 2008 In addition to degree accreditation, continuing education
opportunities at Santa Fe Community College are a valuable resource. The Center for Community Sustainability at Santa Fe Community College offers trades skills education that serves both workforce as well as individual needs for sustainable housing, water conservation, and design. In spite of the existing programs, there is considerable room for additional programs and activities.
209
Sustainability:Legislation and OrdinanceIn 2010 the NM State Senate enacted energy efficiency and conservation measures for all State-funded building projects of significant size.
Green Building Councilhttp://www.sfahba.com/index.php/green/
Residential Green Building Codehttp://www.santafenm.gov/index.aspx?NID=1297
City of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Ordinance No. 2009-9
www.santafenm.gov/archives/169/2009-09.pdf
Sustainable Santa Fe PlanCity of Santa Fe, New Mexico – Resolution 2008-93
http://www.santafenm.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/702
210
Community Involvement
Development of Santa Fe Green Building Codes Joint City/County Energy Task Force Regional Economic Development Initiatives Statewide Biofuels Plan New Mexico Green Collaborative New Mexico Green Chamber of Commerce
211
Sustainability Recognition
The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards ceremony was held April 27, 2013. The winning categories included:
1. Renewable Energy or Energy Conservation Project 2. Water Conservation Project 3. Low-Carbon Transportation Project 4. Green Building Project5. Ecological or Other Climate Change Adaptation Project 6. Solid Waste Reduction Project7. Food System Project8. Youth-led Project9. Community Outreach Project10. Sustainability Journalism Project11. Environmental Justice Project12. Green Economic Development Project13. Other (An outstanding project that is not covered under one of the other categories)
The 2013 Sustainable Santa Fe Awards are sponsored by the City of Santa Fe’s Sustainable Santa Fe Commission, Earth Care, the Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce and the Green Fire Times.
212
Sustainability at SFCC
Santa Fe Community College has strategically sought to develop the opportunity to be the hub of sustainability learning, green campus operations and workforce training for green industry in the northern New Mexico region.
Structure/Areas of Focus Reduce Natural Resource Depletion Reduce Pollution Ensure Healthy Indoor Environments Model and Teach Sustainable Concepts and Practices
Sustainability Steering Committee Linked to Internal and External Groups Tied to Curriculum
213
SFCC Sustainability Plan Goals
1. Reduce Natural Resource DepletionA. Non-renewable fuels
B. Fresh water reserves
C. Non-renewable materials
D. Land and soil
2. Reduce PollutionA. Air pollution
B. Water pollution
C. Land pollution
D. Light pollution
3. Ensure Healthy Indoor EnvironmentsA. Air quality
B. Nutrition
4. Model and Teach Sustainable ConceptsA. Institutional commitment
B. Organizational structure
C. Model and teach sustainability
214
SFCC’s History of Sustainability2006 - Developed a Sustainability Plan (revised 2009)2007 - Signed the American College & University President’s Climate Commitment2008 - Held the Green Jobs Forum - Biomass Heating System2009 - Built the Sustainable Technology Center considered to be the leading green instructional facility in the United States.
- Institutional Master Plan (inclusion of sustainability plan)2010 - Passage of bond for infrastructure improvement - LEED certification* for the Health & Sciences building2011 - Achieved LEED Gold rating for Trades and Advanced Technology Center2012-13 - Developed curricula to teach sustainability for careers in green industry2013-14 - 1.6 MV Solar array installation (approximately 15 acres)
* Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a comprehensive green building rating system
215
Sustainability:We are doing our part
Encouraging use of reusable bottles Going paperless in key areas Replacing wastebasket liners only
when needed Turning off lights in the cafeteria
unless really needed Turning off lights and computers in
offices when not in use Introducing solar energy Carpooling and Ride Sharing
underway Use of Solar (Trades and Advanced
Technology Center)
Water Treatment Plant – Graywater irrigation
Biomass Boiler Bicycle Trail Connection Recycling Campus Composting Lighting Design and Retrofits Ride-share parking incentive Standard LEED Checklist for new
buildings Replaced 2 - 300 ton chillers with
efficient ones
SFCC has created internal programs and key practices to reduce natural resource depletion, reduce pollution and ensure healthy indoor environments:
216
Sustainability:Green Programs at SFCC
Associate in Applied Science Sustainable Technologies
(Revision) Building Science & Construction
Technologies (New)
Certificate Programs Biofuels Environmental Technologies Facilities Technologies Green Building Construction
Skills Green Building Systems Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning
Plumbing Solar Energy Sustainable Agriculture (in
development) Water Treatment Operator
Non-Credit Offerings New Mexico Energy $mart
Academy Building Performance Institute
(BPI) Healthy Air Home Energy Rater Systems
(HERS) Weatherization
Lead Abatement Radon Mitigation
SFCC is recognized in ACUPCC’s 2009 Annual Report as one of three schools focusing on sustainability in the curriculum in innovative ways.
217
Sustainability:SFCC Greenhouse Gas by Source
Percentage by source in 2007/08 (baseline)
218
Sustainability:Proposed Project
2013 1.7 MW solar PV
installation Per year will
Generate 3,441 mWh Save 11,734 MMBtu Reduce GHG by 920
metric tons
TATC solar thermal For 1/2 of 2013
Save 725 therms (73 MMBtu)
Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons
TATC adsorption chiller Per year will
Save 14 mWh (47 MMBtu)
Reduce GHG by 4 metric tons
2014 TATC solar thermal
Per year will Save an additional 725
therms Reduce GHG by an
additional 4 metric tons
219
Sustainability:Potential Projects 2014 - 2016
Convert lighting to LED from T8 fluorescent Incrementally over three years - per year will
Save 316 MWh (1,078 MMBtu) Reduce GHG by 85 metric tons
2016 Create electric shuttle fleet
Per year will Save 5% total VMT Reduce GHG by 252 metric tons
220
Sustainability:Campus Greenhouse Gases
*Does not include T&D losses
1 MMbtu gas = .0529 metric tonnes1 MMbtu electricity = .2006 metric tonnes1 MMbtu wood = .0046 metric tonnes
Source:
07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 -
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
1,139
797 763 805 790 786 782 782 782 782
4,549 4,403
4,099
4,414
4,860 4,750
4,038
3,325 3,325 3,325
- - 15 14 21 21 21 21 21 21
5,688
5,200
4,877
5,233
5,671 5,557
4,841
4,128 4,128 4,128
Per year, energy only*
Natural GasElectricityWoodTotal GHG
27% reduc-tion in 2016/17 from 2007/08 base-line
221
Sustainability Challenges
Resource Allocation Funding Staffing
Changing Technology
Accountability Align performance
measures with goals Data collection Assign responsibility
Annual review and update
222
Sustainability Future Goals
Optimization of building resources Micro grid project Sustainable agriculture Zero-waste Platinum LEED certifications Update sustainability plan Expand curriculum support
223
Challenges Opportunities
Higher Education Trends
224
Higher Education Trends & Issues
Focus on increasing graduation rates and degree production
Funding formula shift from access to success Assessment of student learning College readiness Developmental education Accelerate progress to completion Competency-based education Credit for prior learning Online and hybrid learning Economic and workforce development STEM-H Green job training
225
Challenges For SFCC
Aging population in Santa Fe High school graduates projected to flat line Geographic Area of Responsibility Limited opportunities in New Mexico Pockets of poverty Lack of academic preparedness Funding formula changing to degree
completion Emerging technologies
226
Opportunities – Degree Completion Change how we teach developmental
education With the SCH portion of the funding
diminishing we do not have to be restricted in how we tackle developmental education classes
Addresses Funding formula Lack of academic preparedness
227
Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand Programs in Health Care
High growth in jobs creation High wage jobs High state funding Serves the community’s aging population Emerging technologies
Addresses Aging population Brain drain Funding formula Pockets of poverty
228
Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand night and weekend degree
programs Target working adults Our tuition is lower than private colleges Our quality of program is better than
private colleges Addresses
Flat line high school graduates Expanded market
Room utilization issues
229
Opportunities – Degree Completion Expand fully-online programs to out-of-state and
out-of-country Our out-of-state tuition is lower than most instate tuition Our in-state tuition is lower than most institutions in NM Funding formula has changed Technology has changed Geographic Area of Responsibility does not apply Partnership with LANL Partnership with other countries
Addresses Funding formula Flat line high school graduates