3
*Authored by Van T. Ly, Esq., Chief of Staff for SF Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, with the help of Sheriff Mirkarimi, Under Sheriff Federico Rocha, Chief Deputy Kathy Gorwood, and Director of Programs, Ali Riker. Page 1 SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S JAIL POPULATION DATA* Our actual jail count on the first day of every month during the period of 1/1/2010 2/1/2015 (graph) Our quarterly average jail count for the period of 2010-2014 (chart) Both sets of empirical data show the expected trend of a decline in the general jail population in the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department. The decline in the jail population is attributable to a number of factors, and the aggregate effect of which aims at one goal ENHANCEMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Multi-disciplinary approach to promote public safety: From alternative to incarceration measures to alternative sentencing programs combined with focused effort on combating recidivism. o Lowering incarceration rate while maintaining accountability through supervised release to our robust community-based or contracted programs, and alternative sentencing programs; and, o Reduction of Recidivism through a continuum of educational opportunities, vocational training, and social and health care services (in-custody and post-release). 1920 2066 2039 1821 1566 1691 1680 1678 1733 1792 1752 1794 1674 1737 1797 1684 1600 1580 1490 1446 1424 1425 1492 1537 1495 1640 1617 1577 1572 1564 1540 1510 1513 1547 1473 1529 1470 1521 1475 1544 1497 1499 1498 1392 1324 1338 1276 1267 1251 1277 1289 1306 1255 1279 1265 1256 1307 1315 1266 1228 1108 1156 1/1/2010 2/1/2010 3/1/2010 4/1/2010 5/1/2010 6/1/2010 7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 10/1/2010 11/1/2010 12/1/2010 1/1/2011 2/1/2011 3/1/2011 4/1/2011 5/1/2011 6/1/2011 7/1/2011 8/1/2011 9/1/2011 10/1/2011 11/1/2011 12/1/2011 1/1/2012 2/1/2012 3/1/2012 4/1/2012 5/1/2012 6/1/2012 7/1/2012 8/1/2012 9/1/2012 10/1/2012 11/1/2012 12/1/2012 1/1/2013 2/1/2013 3/1/2013 4/1/2013 5/1/2013 6/1/2013 7/1/2013 8/1/2013 9/1/2013 10/1/2013 11/1/2013 12/1/2013 1/1/2014 2/1/2014 3/1/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014 6/1/2014 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 9/1/2014 10/1/2014 11/1/2014 12/1/2014 1/1/2015 2/1/2015 S.F. Sheriff Jail Population Jail Ct.

SF SHERIFF_jail Stats_factors_FINAL (1) (1)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

final

Citation preview

Page 1: SF SHERIFF_jail Stats_factors_FINAL (1) (1)

*Authored by Van T. Ly, Esq., Chief of Staff for SF Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, with the help of Sheriff Mirkarimi, Under Sheriff Federico Rocha, Chief Deputy Kathy Gorwood, and Director of Programs, Ali Riker. Page 1

SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S JAIL POPULATION DATA* Our actual jail count on the first day of every month during the period of 1/1/2010 – 2/1/2015 (graph)

Our quarterly average jail count for the period of 2010-2014 (chart)

Both sets of empirical data show the expected trend of a decline in the general jail population

in the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department.

The decline in the jail population is attributable to a number of factors, and the aggregate effect

of which aims at one goal – ENHANCEMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

Multi-disciplinary approach to promote public safety: From alternative to incarceration

measures to alternative sentencing programs combined with focused effort on combating

recidivism.

o Lowering incarceration rate while maintaining accountability through supervised release

to our robust community-based or contracted programs, and alternative sentencing

programs; and,

o Reduction of Recidivism through a continuum of educational opportunities, vocational

training, and social and health care services (in-custody and post-release).

1920

20662039

1821

1566

1691168016781733

17921752

1794

1674

1737

1797

1684

16001580

1490144614241425

14921537

1495

16401617157715721564

154015101513

1547

14731529

14701521

1475

1544149714991498

1392

13241338

127612671251127712891306

1255127912651256

130713151266

1228

11081156

1/1/

2010

2/1/

2010

3/1/

2010

4/1/

2010

5/1/

2010

6/1/

2010

7/1/

2010

8/1/

2010

9/1/

2010

10/1

/201

0

11/1

/201

0

12/1

/201

0

1/1/

2011

2/1/

2011

3/1/

2011

4/1/

2011

5/1/

2011

6/1/

2011

7/1/

2011

8/1/

2011

9/1/

2011

10/1

/201

1

11/1

/201

1

12/1

/201

1

1/1/

2012

2/1/

2012

3/1/

2012

4/1/

2012

5/1/

2012

6/1/

2012

7/1/

2012

8/1/

2012

9/1/

2012

10/1

/201

2

11/1

/201

2

12/1

/201

2

1/1/

2013

2/1/

2013

3/1/

2013

4/1/

2013

5/1/

2013

6/1/

2013

7/1/

2013

8/1/

2013

9/1/

2013

10/1

/201

3

11/1

/201

3

12/1

/201

3

1/1/

2014

2/1/

2014

3/1/

2014

4/1/

2014

5/1/

2014

6/1/

2014

7/1/

2014

8/1/

2014

9/1/

2014

10/1

/201

4

11/1

/201

4

12/1

/201

4

1/1/

2015

2/1/

2015

S.F. Sheriff Jail Population

Jail Ct.

Page 2: SF SHERIFF_jail Stats_factors_FINAL (1) (1)

2

POTENTIAL FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO JAIL POPULATION DECLINE

o Comprehensive approach:

Alternative to incarceration approach –aims at lowering the rate of incarceration

while maintaining accountability in allowing release from jail (pre- and post-

sentencing) to the direct supervision of the Sheriff Department’s community

based or contracted programs.

Pre-sentencing: Release of lower risk offenders through the SF Sheriff

Department’s contracted program called the Pretrial Diversion Project.

Direct supervision while out of custody allows the offenders to be

productive members of the community (e.g. return to work; family

reunification, etc.) while ensuring that the pre-trial release requirements of

the courts are fulfilled.

Post-sentencing: Release of lower risk offenders to serve their county jail

sentences out of custody through programs, such as Electronic Monitoring

or SWAP. Supervision of lower risk offenders in the community would

allow them to be productive members of the community (e.g. return to

work; family reunification, etc.) while holding them accountable for their

behavior through the restrictive measures.

Reduction of recidivism: In-custody educational, vocational and treatment

services combined with the availability of health care and post-released services

through our re-entry centers correlate directly to the decline of recidivism,

allowing the SF Sheriff’s Department to meet its primary goal of enhancing public

safety.1

Services: In-custody educational, vocational, and counseling services

through programs, such as San Francisco Sheriff’s Department Five Keys

Charter High School, SISTERS, Roads to Recovery, RSVP and COVER.

Through educational opportunities and vocational training, inmates gain

marketable skills which will help them obtain living wage jobs after their

release from custody. Coupled the availability of health care enrollment

while in custody, SF Sheriff’s Department offers a variety of services to

help inmates address their substance abuse or anger management or

mental health problems.

Health care enrollment: In-custody participation creates an incentive to

maintain care and services post-release.

Re-Entry Centers: Offenders receive continuing post-release care and

services through our Community Programs and Women’s Resource

Center.

1 RECIDIVISM – As defined by our department: Within 12 months of being released from custody, inmate is arraigned in San

Francisco on a new offense, or held in SF custody for probation or parole revocation.

Recidivism rates based on a sample consisting of releases between 7/1/2012 – 6/30/2013 of inmates who spent 30 or more days in our programs: ROADS TO RECOVERY – 32%; RSVP – 28%; AND, SISTERS – 31%.

Page 3: SF SHERIFF_jail Stats_factors_FINAL (1) (1)

3

A SAMPLE STUDY

FEBRUARY 4, 2015: THIS IS A SNAP SHOT IN TIME SPECIFIC TO THIS DAY.

o THE SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, HOUSED 1,167 INMATES ON THAT DAY

APPROXIMATELY 65% OF THE IN-CUSTODY POPULATION IS PRE-TRIAL.

o 105 PEOPLE UTILIZED OUR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING PROGRAMS

INDIVIDUALS SERVING THEIR COUNTY JAIL SENTENCES OUT OF CUSTODY THROUGH

SWAP OR ELECTRONIC MONITORING.

AS A COMPARISON: IN 2014, A TOTAL OF 908 UNIQUE PARTICIPANTS ENROLLED

IN EM OR SWAP.

o IN 2013, EM REALIZED A NOTEWORTHY SUCCESS RATE OF 94%.

o 928 PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN OUR COMMUNITY-BASED OR CONTRACTED PROGRAMS

PARTICIPANTS ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE QUALIFIED FOR PRE-

SENTENCE RELEASE OR FOR DIVERSION FROM PROSECUTION.