8/8/2019 Sex Abused
1/3
42 SALVO Issue 12
Prior to 1950, American common law criminal-ized non-marital sex
as a costly burden on societyand on the children of illicit unions.
Society hadan authentic interest in sexual conduct. Only mar-
riage provided for progeny, secured the orderly generational
passage of property, and created a stable community.
Sex AbusedKinseys Lies Shaped AmericanLaw, So Now What?
Human Male (1948) and Sexual Be avior in t e Human Fema e(1953),
Kinsey justied decriminal-izing fornication,
cohabitation,seduction, alienation of affection,adultery, sodomy,
abortion, andpornography. He also supportedlowering the age of
consent, trivi-alizing rape, no-fault divorce,and sexually graphic
sex educa-tion, among other things.
Kinsey & the GestapoThis most famous man in theworld for a
decade, was exposedin a 1998 Yorkshire (England) tele-vision
ocumentary ca e KinseysPaedophiles for directing pedo-phile rapists
who produced theinfamous Table 34(see p. 7) onchild sexuality in
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male . In his York-shire interview
Jones admits that
kids (as young as 2 months old,Table 31) were used by nineadult
males for Kinsey Institutechild experiments. Jones writes,
insey . . . gives prettygraphic descriptions ofheir response to
what he
calls sexual stimulation.f you read those words,ou will see that
he isalking about kids who
are screaming Ki s w oare protesting in every
ay they can the fact thatheir bodies or their per-
sons are being violated.
In his Male book, Kinsey cal-lously wrote of what made for
themost reliable research:
etter ata on prea o-escent climax come fromhe histories of
adulta es w o ave a sex-
al contacts with youngeroys and who, with their
adult backgrounds, areable to recognize andnterpret the boys
ex-eriences. . . . 9 of our
adult male subjects have
COLUMNp / / H a z m a t s _ w i t h J u d i t h R e i s m a n
/
In 1997, biographer Jamesones, Ph.D., wrote that the cel-
ebrated sex researcher Alfredinsey was a crypto-reformerho spent
his every waking hour
attempting to change the sexualores and sex offender laws of
he United States. He also notedat
There is no way thatt e American pu ic inthe 1940s and the
1950swould have sanctionedany form of behavior thatviolated middle
class mo-rality on the part of the
scientist who was tellingthe public that he wasdisinterested and
givingthem the simple truth. . . .[A]ny feature of this pri-vate
life that violatedmiddle class moralitywould have been
cata-strophic for his career.
insey married, said Jones, topreserve is pu ic image . . . at
acosts. Jones documented Kinseyshomosexual, masturbatory, sa-
omasoc istic, an pornograp yaddictions.
In Sexual Behavior in the
8/8/2019 Sex Abused
2/3
Spring 2010 SALVO 43
observed such orgasm . . .on 317 prea o escents . . .observed in
contactswith other boys or othera u ts.
One of those reliable adultales, according to the Yorkshire
elevision investigators, was Dr.ritz Von Ballusecka member
of the German Gestapo. In 1957alluseck, originally arrested
(but
acquitted) for a child sex murder,as tried and convicted in
Germa-y for having violated children
over three decades. According tohe German newspaper
National-
Zeitung :
The Nazis knew and gaveim t e opportunity to
practice his abnormaltendencies in occupiedPoland on Polish
children,who had to choose be-tween Balluseck and thegas ovens.
After the war,the children were dead,but Balluseck lived. (May15,
1957).
Balluseck recorded data fromis sex with children, just as dide
Kinsey Institute researc -
ers. In the year of his trial, Berlinewspaper headlines
revealedat Ba usec correspon eith the American Kinsey Insti-
ute for some time, and had alsogot books from them which
dealt
ith child sexuality ( agespiegel,October 1, 1957).
Kinsey apparently was verynterested in Ballusecks data
gleaned from raping Polish and,ater, German children:
The connection with Kin-sey, towards whom hedshowed off his
crimes,had a disastrous effecton [Balluseck]. . . . [I]n hisdiaries
hed stuck in theletters from the sex re-searcher Kinsey, in
whichhed been encouraged tocontinue his research. . . .
He also started relation-s ips to expan is re-searches. One
shivers tothink of the lengths hewent to. ( agespiege ,May 17,
1957)
As to adult males, Kinsey andhis team stated that 95 percentof
the men of thegreatest genera-tion engaged in
hat was consid-ered deviant sex.
inseys samp epopulation? PaulGebhard , Kinseysco-aut or anater
director of theinsey Institute, ex-
p aine t at, sincemost of their inter-views took placeduring
World WarI, their team used inmates and
1,400 sex offenders as their nor-mal male population. Just
afterthe Male olume was published,
insey told a California judicialsex-crime committee that
theirresearc represente t e popu a-tion as a whole. Really?
Deviant Researchn 2004, the American Legislativexchange Council
(ALEC), which
represents 2,400 state legislators,noted that, of the more
than5,000 men who made up Kinseysresearch base:
2,446 were designated asconvicts, 1,003 omosexu-als, 50
transvestites, 117mentally ill, 342 Other,650 sexua y a useboys.
This yielded 4,608n= Aberrant, and 873n= Norma Ma e su -
jects.
I was ALECs scientic advisoron junk science. After I provedthe
Kinsey Institutes child abuse,
LEC published in its April 2004ssue of he State Factor a
study
SEXby Dr. Linda Jeffrey called Re-storing Legal Protections
forWomen and Children: A HistoricalAnalysis of the States
CriminalCodes. This issue of T e StateFactor called upon
legislators torevisit all laws based on Kinseys
research. California stateSenator Ray Haynes, former ALEC
president and California Repub-lican Whip, wrote in the
studysIntroduction:
Today Kinseys junk sci-ence is the unquestionedfoundation for
all thelegal, legislative and me-dia debate on marriageand civil
unions. . . . [Thisreport] reveals compellingevidence of illegal
andcrimina acts masquera -ing as science. . . . Profes-sor of
Constitutional lawDr. Charles Rice of NotreDame concluded that
Al-fred Kinseys research wascontrived, ideologically
riven an mis ea ing.Any judge, legislator orother public ofcial
whogives cre ence to t atresearch is guilty of mal-practice and
dereliction of
uty.
Another ALEC nding notedhow the American Law Institutes
Model Penal Code (ALIMPC) of1955, which was largely based on
inseys data, inuenced the U.S.Supreme Courts 2003 decision
in
Understandinghow junk sex sciencedeformed our think-
ing and laws is vital.
