Seventh Interim Report Exhs. 11-20

8/13/2019 Seventh Interim Report Exhs. 11-20

1/60

EXHI IT


2/60

SPIVAKATTORNEYSATLAW

LLP

October 21213

BY EMAILDennisM.Walsh Esq.ReviewOfficerTheLawOfficeof Dennis M.Walsh415Madison Avenue 1thFloorNewYork,NY10017

Re: UnitedStates v.District Council, etl. 9 Civ.5722RMB)DearDennis:

17 BroadwayNewYork NY 10019T212 7652100F212.765 8954spivaklipton corn

Thisisto followuponourrecentdiscussions of theattorney-client privilegedcommunicationsthat occurredduring theDistrict CouncilDelegateBody meetingofWednesday October92013. Athe meeting, recently retained outside counsel ortheDistrictCouncil,BarbaraJones appeared beforetheDelegateBodyinordertoprovidelegal adviceregardingwhattheUnion shoulddotocomplywith theJune32010StipulationandOrderRegardingAppointmentofa Review Officer(the Stipulation andOrder ), the1994ConsentDecreeandrelated matters.Upon the conclusionofthisadvice, members of theDistrictCouncil pre sent at the meetingaskedoutsidecounselquestionsonthe samematter, towhich sheresponded.

TheStipulationandOrderspecifically preserves theDistrictCouncil'sprivileges,includingattorney-client privilege.See tipulation rder12(d).Co nsistentwith thatsamerovision,the Review Officerisentitledtorequest hattheDistrict Council complywithFederalRuleofCivil Procedure26(b)(5)(A)andwithS.D.N.Y.Loca lRule 26.2.Asyouhaverequested suchcompliance wedoso by thediscussionset forthbelowandtheattached privilegelog.

TheDistrict Councilasserts theattorney-client privilege,pursuanttoFed. R. Civ.P.26(b)(5)(A)(i)and LocalRule 26.2(a)(1)with res pe ct tothe communicationsofoutsidecounselBarbaraJones attheOctober92013 DelegateBodymeeting.Thecommunicationfor which theprivilege isinvokedisan oralcommunication suchthat LocalRule26.2(a)(2)(B) applies. Theattached privilegelog issummarizedasollows, ThenamefthepersonmakingthecommunicationisBarbaraJones utside counselto th eDistrict Council,andthenamesofthepartiespresentand speakingatthetimeareincluded. SeeLoc al Rule26.2(a)(2)(B)(i). ThecommunicationtookplaceonWednesdayOctober 9 2013 tthe DistrictCouncilDelegate Bodymeeting ocatedattheDistrictCouncil officesat 395HudsonStreet, NewYork NY.See ocalRule 26.2 a) 2) B) ii).Thecommunication concernedlegaladviceregardingthe obligationsoftheDistrict


3/60


4/60

SPIVAK. LLPNITORNEYSATL WDennis M.Walsh, Esq.Re: UnitedStates v. District Council,et l. 90 iv.5722 RMBOctober 21,2013Page 3

third partiesin thelarge assemblage, whosepresencewould have destroyedthe privilege.Without such assurances,counsel would have been inhibited inthescope ofher advice tothe Cou ncil and theUnion memberswould havebeen inhibited in their provision ofinformationnecessaryto enable counsel togive sound andinformed advice. Upjohn,449U.S.at 390. As hestenographer andthe security guardswerebothnecessary tocounsel'sfrankprovisionof legaladvice tothe District Co unciland to the District Council'sab ility to even hold th e Delegate meeting, hepresence of thesepartiesdoes notwaivethe attorney-client privilege.

TheDistrictCouncil'smanagerial and professionalpersonnelnamely,ChiefComplianceOfficerJoshLeicht, Director ofOperationsMatthew Walker, Assistant totheDirectorofOperationsYariela Carvajal,Assistant Communications DirectorJulieEastandmyselfwere alsopresent at themeeting.Thoseindividuals arenotthird parties suchthattheattorney-client privilege hasbeenwaived. The privilege extends to cover theseemployees andagentsofthe client whoare directly involvedwith the matters discussedbyoutsidecounsel. SeeUpjohn,449U.S. t 389,391-92;see also InreCopperMkt.Antitrust Litiq. 200 F.R.D.213,217S.D.N.Y. 2001). Additionally,for Josh Leicht andmyself,alsoattorneys to theCouncil, the privilege encompasses communicationsbetween attorneysthat aredesignedto facili tatetherendition oflegaladvice tothe client,aswasthe advice giving session atissuehere.Martinv. ValleyNat'lBankof Ariz.,140F.R.D.291,306 S.D.N.Y. 1991).

Inresponse to yoursuggestionthat the District Council has waived its attorney-client privilegein thepastwith re spect to communicationsmadeat Delegate Bodymeetings at which you or your representativewerepresent, the Stipulationand Orderpreservessuch privilegewhere theReviewOfficer has access to thecommunication orinformation. See Stipulation and Order 2(d). Because your presenceat previousDelegate Body meetings was undertaken tofurther our commoninterest in achievingtheobjectives of thisStipulation andOrder, this is not tobe deemedawaiver of applicableprivilege or work-productprotection. Id. Underhe Stipulation and Order, tappearshattheprivilege may beinvoked evenafter you aregivenaccess o information. Id.

'Scott Danielsonand Martin Szabunio appearing asDistrict Co uncil st ff onExhibit Bof the attachedprivilege log)are Unionmembers aswell as employeesandthereforenot thirdparties.


5/60

SPIVAKATTORNEYS AT LAW

LLP

Dennis M Walsh, Esq.Re:UnitedStates v. District Council et t. 9 iv. 5722RMB)October 21,2013Page4

Finally, withrespectto the audiorecordingof the October 9,2013meetingrequiredbySec ti on22 E) f its Bylaws,theDistrictCouncilwill ofcourse, prepare aredactedcopyand makethat copy available to you.Theprivilegedcommunications beginappro ximatelyone hour 21 minutes, and 24seconds1:21:24)after commencementftheaudiorecording andconcludeat approximatelyone hour55minutes and 18 seconds1:55:18).

Very trulyyours

James M Murphyc ... . 1 4

Enclosurecc: BYE-MAIL

Bridget M.RohdeCounsel o theReviewOfficerMintz,Levin,Cohn,erris,GlovskyandPopeo,P.C.666hird AvenueNew York, NY10017Barbara S.JonesZuckermanSpaederLLPCounsel to theDis tr ict Council1185AvenueoftheAmericasNewYork,NY10036


6/60

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKUNITED STATESOF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs,-against-

DISTRICT COUNCIL OFNEW YORK CITYAND VICINITY OF THE UNITEDBROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERSANDJOINERS OF AMERICA, t al.,

Defendants.

X

X

No. 90 Civ. 5722 RMB)

SCHEDULE OF PRIVILEGEDORAL COMMUNICATIONSPursuant to Rule 26(b)(5)of he Federal Rules of ivil Procedure and Rule 26.2 of he Local

Civil Rules of he Southern District ofNew York, nd the June 3, 010 Stipulation and Order RegardingAppointment ofa Review Officer in the above-captioned action, the District Council ofNew York Cityand Vicinity of he United Brotherhood of arpenters and Joiners ofAmerica District Council ), by itsattorneys, hereby asserts that the following communications are privileged under the attorney-clientprivilege doctrine:Date Location

10/09/13 395 HudsonStreet,NY, Y.

Person MakingCom unicationBarbara S. Jones

Other SpeakersJames Noonan(Local 157 Delegate)Kevin Corrigan(Local 157 Delegate)Bob Rieche(Local 1556 Delegate)John Paulsen(Local 157 Delegate)Danny Dore(Local 157 Delegate)Bob Corrigan(Local 157 Delegate)Greg Kelty(Local 157 Delegate)Sal Tagliaferro(Local 926 Delegate)

Others PresentDelegates lists attachedas Ex.A)Don Kernisant(security personnel)Henry Hunter(security personnel)Ryahn Spece(stenographer)Julie East(Asst. Commc n Dir.)District Council memberslist attached as Ex.B)District Council Staff listattached as Ex.C)

SubjectLegal advice related toDistrict Councilobligations underStipulation and Orderand Consent Decree

The District Council expressly reserves the right to supplement, amend or otherwise modify this schedule.-1-


7/60

Dated: New York,New YorkOctober 21,2013

SPIVAK LIPTON LLPAttorneys or District Council1700 Broadway, st FloorNew York,New York 10019Phone: 212) 65-2100Fax: 212) 65-8954

By:

TO: Dennis M alsh,Esq,Review OfficerThe Law Office of ennis M alsh415 Madison Avenue, th FloorNew York,NY 10017


8/60

MINTZEVINBridgetM. ohde 2126926883 [email protected]

October23,013BYEMILJames Murphy,sq.Spivak Lipton1700BroadwayNewYork,NewYork 10019

Re: UnitedStates v.District Council,t al.90 iv.5722RMB)

ChryslerCenter666 Third Avenue

NewYork,NY1001721 2-935-3000

212-983-3115 faxwww,ini ntz .co m

DearMr.Murphy:Werite inresponse toyour tt rofctober21,013, which addresses theDistrict

Council'sassertionofhe attorney-client privilege fortheportionofheOctober 9,2013delegatebodymeetingcomprisingremarksby,nddiscussionwith,heircounsel,BarbaraS.Jones. Weisagreewith yourreadingofovelandthe conclusionthat theDistrict Council didnotwaivetsprivilegebythepresenceofertainthirdparties duringthat part ofhe meetinginvolvingJudge Jonesandthedelegates. Thataid, weareinterestedin moving beyond thatdisagreementtothedevelopmentof protocol for the assertionofhe attorney-clientprivilegeatdelegatebodymeetingsin thefuture.

First,fortherecord,United States v. Kovel,296 F.2d9182d Cir.1961),does not standfor the broad propositionthatyoustatebut rather forthefar more limite

d principlethat thepresence ofnaccountant,whetherhiredbyhe lawyerorbytheclient,whilethe clientisrelatingaomplicated taxstorytothelawyer,oughtnotdestroy theprivilege...;thepresenceoftheaccountantisnecessary,oratleasthighly useful,forthe effectiveconsultation between theclientand thelawyer whichhe privilege is designed topermit. Kovel,296F.2dat922.UnitedStatesv.Ackert, 169.3d 136 2d Cir.1999),whichyoualso citeforamuchbroaderprinciplethan it stands for, clearlysetsforththesameimited principle, notingthat Kovelrecognizedthattheinclusionofahirdparty in attorney-clientcommunicationsdoesnotdestroythe privilegeifthepurposeofhethirdparty'sparticipationis toimprove thecomprehensionofhecommunicationsbetweenattorney andclient. Ackert,169.3d at 139.Notably, heSecondCircuitrejected theapplication ofovelo thesituationbeforeitinAckert, where aparty arguedthattheprivilege applied to usefulcommunicationsbetweenanattorneyandaninvestmentbankerrelativetoprovidingadvicetoitsclient.Id.

Thelimited holdingsofhesecasesis notsurprisinggiven thattheattorney-clientprivilegeistobeconstrued narrowly: Inorder tobalancethis protection of onfidentialitywiththecompeting valueof ublic disclosure,however,ourtsapply [the privilege]onlywherenecessaryto achieveits purposeandconstruetheprivilege narrowlybecauseitrenders relevantinformationundiscoverable. Unitedtatesv. Mejia,655 F.3d 126,1322dCir.2011) internal

Mintz,evin,Cohn,erris,Glovsky andPopeo, .C.BOSTON WASHINGTON NEWYORK STAMFORD LOSANGELES PALO LTO SANDIEGO LONDON ISRAEL


9/60

Mintz, evin,Cohn, erris,Glovskyand Popeo,.C.Octo ber23,2013Page2

quotations andadditionalcitationsomitted).Thislong-standingrationale arguablycarries evengreater weightgiven theinvolvementof he ReviewOfficer.

Simply put, thesecases do notstand for thebroad, untetheredpropositionthatpresenceofnecessarythirdparties doesnotdefeatthe privilege. Moreover hethird partieswhowerepresentduring thepertinent part of hedelegatebodymeetingdonotsatisfy theexceptiontowaiverofhe attorney-clientprivilege set forthinKovel,sthey werenot necessarytoimprovethe comprehension ofommunicationsbetweenJudge Jonesandthe delegates.

Our nterest,however s not to accesscommunicationsbetween the DistrictCouncilandts attorneysthatthe Council wishestobeprivileged. It is our hope to moveforward withaprotocol forassertionofhe attorney-clientprivilegeatfuture delegate body meetings thatbothprotectsthe privilegeand respects therightofheReviewOfficer under he StipulationandOrder o attendthemeetings. eskthat theDistrictCouncildraftsucha rotocolfortheReview Officersreview.Weuggestthatthisprotocol establishaettimeduring or segmentofmeetings at whichattorney-clientprivilegewillbe asserted.Therotocol shouldensurethat therequirementsnecessaryfortheprivilege to apply are sat isf ied Allattorney-clientprivilegedmatters shouldthenbediscussedduring thatsegmentofhe meeting.Theprotocolshouldbedesigned so thattheRO ndother professionalsforthat matter,are notepeatedlyaskedto leavethe room.

Pleaselet usknowwhetheryouwilldraft sucharotocol.Sincerely,

BridgetM ohde

cc:BarbaraS.Jones,Esq. By email


10/60

EXHI IT


11/60


12/60

Page1 ofAaron GholstonFrom: BarbaraEtroy [email protected]: Wednesday eptember 11213:45PMTo: AaronGholstonCc: BarbaraElroySubject: stewardsk llrequirements and hatill be deactivatedHi AaronAllen hasbeendoingsomeesting on heprocessthatwill deactivate steward ski lls for thosemembers ha tdonothavell ofhe required ski lls forthat member.henum bers arehigh.Hereiswhathetestshowsill happen.BarbaraCERT UBC CERTIFIEDUBCSTEWARDmemberteward skillschecked :1 500membertewardskills deactivated: 938DBCERT CERTIFIED UBCSTEWARDmemberteward skills checked : 37memberteward skillsdeactivated: 24FC CERT CERTIFIEDUBCSTEWARDmembertewardskillschecked : 140membertewardskillsdeactivated: 6WERT CERTIFIEDUBCSTEWARDmemberteward ski ll schecked : 32member teward sk il ls deactivated : 12

SP CERT CERTIFIEDUBCSTEWARDmember tewardskillschecked : 2membertewardski ll sdeactivated : 5TBCERT CERTIFIEDUBCSTEWARDmember tewardskil ls checked : 43memberteward skil ls deactivated : 21All UBC 4112tewardskillswithrequirmentstotal member killschecked :1772to talmember killsdeactivated :1062Therogram wi ll deactivate60% f he assignedstewardskillsthat haverequirements.

10/9/2013


13/60

DISTRICT COUNCILOF NEW YORK ITY AND VICINITYUnited Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joinersof America

Out f work ist212-3664330TN ree: .800-858.8683Fax 12-2294316

Memorandum

396 udson treetNew ork, .Y. 0014Phone: 212)366-7500

To: All Locals/ embersFrom: Aaron W holston, ob Referral SupervisorSubject: Expired Skill CertificationsDate: August 12,2013

Effective October31, 013, s per section9 fthe Job Referral policy A carpenter isresponsible for maintaining any ertification that may expire with the passage of ime, uch asCPR,NYS-DOL Laser Safety Training.The ob Referral office does not maintain or track thisinformation.(A) If a member has allowed their skill certification s)to expire,that certification s) ill gointo a dormant tatusfor up to 60 daysto allow them to be recertified. Once his skillcertification s) s recertified, t is the member s esponsibility to notifythe Out f Work ist toensure that t has been updated. fthe expired certification s)are not updated with the OutofWork ist within the allotted time, he certification s) ill automatically be removed from themembers kill profile at the Out of Work istPlease feel free to contact the Out of Work ist if you have any additional concerns or questions.This important information can also be reviewed on the District Council website.


14/60

NewYorkCity DistrictCouncilof CarpentersLaborTechnicalCollege395HudsonStreet NewYork,NY10014 212) 27-2224phone 212)27 -977 5oxwww.nyodletrIotoouncll.orgMartinT.DalyDirector

Tc?09Q9Me tIQJDIteWsgici oRe-certjfygncl hop tewardinorder to,oea gertifie4Shyteward,t. rhAt bsoskNewYgrl


15/60

EXHI IT


16/60

Local Union Compliance VisitProceduresGeneral

1. List ll employees andtheir positions2. Note workocations ofll employees3. Notetelephonenumbers of llemployees4. Obtain telephone ist5. Obtain organizational chart6. Noteprocess forcollectingand accountingfordues.Doesthelocal accept

cash?Ifso how s thataccountedfor?7. Notewhohasaccessto localunion. Who as keysetc?

Professionals1. Identify and notea. Lawyer

b. Accountantc. IT co nsul ta nt

2. Reviewa. Engagement ettersb. Contractsc. Insurancepolicies

3. Copya. Engagement ettersb. Co ntract sc. Insurancepolicies

Financial1. Identifyandnote

a. Allbank and investment ac counts,ncludingaccountnumbersb. Signatories to ll accountsc. Process for disbursingfunds( fignatories whocansignd. Petty cashe. All contractsincluding internetphone,maintenance contractsf Cash disbursement ournalsg. Check registersh. Vendoril esi Accounts payablej Account eceivable dues)k. Bank statements1 Allcreditcards andho lder sof ards


17/60

m. Costssociated withnominationnotifications letter/postcard2. Review

a Yearto dateaccountspayableb. Year to datecheckregisterc Yearto datebil lsd. Accountstatementsincludingcancelledcheckse. Reconciliationreportsforeachbank accountf Creditcardstatementsg. Contracts

3. Copya. Cash disbursementournalorcheckregisterforlast yearb. Yearto dateofll accountstatementsincludingcancelledchecksc Yearodate of econciliationreports availabled. Yeartodate of redit cardstatements

Business Documents1. Identifyand Note:

a. Bylawsncludingdate revised and receipt ofUniformBylaws fromb. Minutes ofll regular andexecutivecommitteemeetingminutesc M2 Reportsd. Financial uditse. Correspondenceile sf TrustAgreements/Scholarship fundbylaws/agreementsg. Leasesh. Bondi Personnelpolicy/employeehandbookj Sexual harassmentolicyk. Anyother policies1 Nomination notificationletter/postcard

2. Copya. Bylaws andreceiptofUniformBylawsfromb. Latest M2reportc LatestFinancial Auditd. Leasee. Personnel policyf Sexual harassment olicyg. Anyotherbusinesspoliciesh. Any otherdocumentsdeemed interestingi Nominationnotificationletter/postcard


18/60

Computer IT1 Identifyandnote

a A11 computer towersandmonitorsb Laptopsc Telephonesd Printerse Scannersf Faxmachinesg OtherIT equipmentncludingsmartphonesh Networki Anybackupsystemforem ail harddrivesandserv er sj Programsncluding versions if possible

i Operatingii Email

iii Word processingiv Accountingk UsersI dministr torm Allemailaddresses and personsas signedto themn Documentetentionpolicieso Computerusepolicy

2 Reviewa Email inboxes outboxes andtrashofll accountsb All harddrivesandfiles onserversc History of nternetbrowsersd Trash

3 Copya Documentetentionpolicy


19/60

There is no xhibit 4


20/60

EXHI IT


21/60

District CouncilofNewYork andVicinityTrialProcedures

(Approvedby the De lega te Body on August28,013)

I.Administrative Support,FormsandProceduresA. RolesThe partieswillbe knownasthe Charging Party andtheRespondent.TheTrial Chairs will beknownas Trial Chairs (TC). The roleof the TCs will beindependent:administrativelycomparable tohearing officers or administrativetrial judges subject to appeal pursuant to theUnited Brotherhoodof arpenters Constitution( UBConstitution ).Current Trial Chairswillcontinueto serve andcan only beterminated forgood cause. Duringthetenureof heReview Officer,a TCmay only beterminated forgoodca use afterapprovalfromthe ReviewOfficer. After thetenureofheReviewOfficer a TCmayonlybe terminatedwith approvalfrom Office of he United States Attorney forthe SouthernDistrict ofNew York.Vacanciesina TCosition willbefi lle dfollowingthesolicitation,reviewandapproval processfollowed bythe District Coun cil whenseeking professional services.The Trial Pa nel (TP ) illcontinue to becom pri sed of uly electedDistrict Council memberswho will functionas urorscomparable to jurorsin a civil case as under theU Constitution.TCs willrotate, starting inalphabetical order and will sit at thefirst second orthirddates ea chmonth. Schedules will bearranged for six monthsin advance andanyTC may exchangeanassigneddatewith another TC, or a schedulingor otherconflict,andmustinform the DirectorofOperations( DoO )rhis designee of heschedulechange. Changeswillbe posted on theDistrictCouncil website.B. Administration ofthe DisciplinaryProgramThe Disciplinary Programwill beadministered by theDoO. TCs will report tothe DoO foradministrative purposes butfunction independently as to thesubstanceof the casesheard.Invoicesfor services relatedto theDisciplinaryProgramwill be sent to theDoOr his designee.C Ad mini str ative SupportWhateverstaff is necessaryto adequately assist theDoO with theadministrativedemandsof heDisciplinaryProgram will be provided by the District Council. TheDoOmay designatemembers of his staff to perform administrative responsibilities associatedwiththe Disciplinary

Page1 f12


22/60

Program. Amemberof heDoOsstaff will bedesignatedto provide administrative supporttothe Disciplinary Program andtheTCs. Thatstaff member(s)hould be able to communicatewith the membership involved inthedisciplinary process andwith the TCs,s well as completest atistical assessments createand upda te forms,andpreparerequired documents.TheDisciplinaryProgramstaff member(s) ill beresponsibleforcoordinatingcommunicationwiththe parties,facilitatingsettlement talks at theFirst ReadandTrial datesandadministering aPlea byMailProgram. The CCOand TC swill work collaboratively withtheDoO staffandprovidetrainingforthe staffasrequired.

Cases brought bytheIGOillbeeligible fora PleabyMail settlementprogram. Letters senttothe Respondent inIGO caseswillinclude language instructingtheRespondentto comp leteandreturn the pleaformandto contacttheIGOftheRespondent s interested in settling the matter.If the Respondentwantsto plead guilty but the parties cann otagreeon a sanction, theRespondent may plead guilty bymailandthepenalty will be dete rmined bytheTP.In addition topreparing and sending the letters/forms, the Disciplinary Programstaff member(s)will prepare the trialfolders,arrangefor any technological assistance, arrange thephysical spac efor eac h proceeding andattend all FirstReads and Trial proceedings. Before each Trial, aDisciplinaryProgram staff member(s)mustascertain the prior disciplinary history of eachRespondentandprovidethatinformation to theTCThe Disciplinary Program staffmember(s)will be available to communicate on behalf of theTCswith members and otherDistrict Council sta ff to coordinate meetings and completeco rrespondenceand service ofocuments.A atabase of llproceedingsgoin g forward lis tin goffenses, results, penaltiesrecommendedandthose ultimately imposed willbe created and keptup todatebythe Disciplinary Program staff member(s). Themonthlydisciplinary reportcurrently preparedby the IGOwill beprepared bythe DoOorhis designeeandwill also beprovidedto the TCs.D Forms

Thefollowing forms willbe utilized and theirtemplates will beke pt bytheDoO1. ChargeForm -OneChargeFormwill be establishedthatmust beus ed byall Charging

Parties in memberv. member cases. The IGO and the RO may, ut are not required to,use this form in any mattercommencedbytheir respective offices.

2 First ReadResult Formwillbe preparedby the TCfter assessing the sufficiencyofhecharging document. The formwillbe signed by theTCandwill documentthedecisionand, wherecharges are dismissed the reason s)for dismissal andwill bekept inthe casefi le.

Page f 2


23/60

3. Notification Letterofhe FirstRead results Letters will be senttoparties advising themof heresults ofhe First Read. When charges are dismissed, the le tter willadvise theparties of hereason forthe dismissal.

4 AffidavitofService will beprepared by aDisciplinary Program staff membertodocumentmailing ofthechargestotheRespondentandhearing notices to all partiesTheaffidavitwillincludelanguage that it and any attached documentsarekeptas abusinessrecord perCPLR 518.

5. PleaForm: The Plea Formshall containthe caption forthe matter and the numberassigned tothematter. The PleaForm shallprovide acleardirection tothe accused thats/hemaypleadeither guilty ornot guilty to thechargeand indicate hischoicebycheckingan appropriateboxonthe form, igningtheform, writing his UBCID numberon the form andreturning itbyirst classmail,registered mail,oremail tothe DoOttheaddressindicatedon theform ThePlea Formwill includenoticethat a plea of guiltywillbecome part ofhepleadingmembers unionfile It willfurthernotify thememberthat apleaofuiltyby mailis finalandmay not be withdrawn Failuretoreturn the formwill be consideredapleaof otguilty.

6. Withdrawn/SettledCharges:Whenchargesare wi thdrawn before the FirstRead orTrialas aresult of artiesagreeingto settl e thematter, the Ch argingParty will signtheFirst Read/Trial Summarysheet indicatingthats/hehaswithdrawn thecharges.

7. NotificationofTrial DateLetter containing the following information/notices willbesenttoall parties:o Notice tobothparties tobring all witnesses and 10opies of ocu ment ary evidence.o Noticethat the Charging Party the actual signatoryon theCharge Form)ust appear

or thecase will be dismissed.o Notice thatthe Respondentwill be tried inabsentiaifs/he fai ls toappear.o Notice that ifparties settle amatter before the hearing they must notify \a

DisciplinaryProgramstaffmember about the result.o Language explainingthe Respondent sopportunitytopleadguilty by mail, including

an explanation thatwhere thereis aguilty pleaby mail,theTPwillonlydecidepenaltyand thataguilty plea willre mainin the members permanent record.Fo rIOcases,Re spondents will be directed to contact the IGO ftheywishtoresolvechargesbysettlementwithout ahearing.

o Includes information that, uponwrittenrequest of itherparty,the DoO will notifymembersthatthey are requested to appearaswitnesses attrial but that amembercannotbe compelledto attend asa witness.

o Cautionsparties that ifaudio/video/electronic evidence is to beused,the party mustmakecopiesthat canbe admitted into evidence and kept by the Panel, whetherbyDVD D lash drive etc.Requiresthepartyto notify theDoO 48hours inadvanceof the hearing datesoappropriateequipmentcanbe obtained andsetup fortheproceeding.Warns the party that ifthis isnot donein advance,the evidence may notbeadmitted.

Page3 f12


24/60

8. First Read/Trial Sign-InForm.Thisform willbekept by thesecurity officerontheFirstRead and trialdate.Partiesand witnesses will sign inwhenthey arrive andindicatewhetheror notthere is apossibility of settlement. If thereis they willbe directedtomeet utside the presenceofheTPnd TCoseek aresolution. Ifth ey needassistance,aDisciplinary Program staffmember(s)ill fa cili tate .

9. Trial Verdict andPenaltyLetters in for min gthe partiesof theTP's verdictand,ifguilty, thepenalty imposed.TheLetter will informthe partiesoftheappealprocess,includingthetime in whichanappeal mustbefiled

10.Report of Trial Panel Proceedings. Thisform documents whowaspresent atthehearing,verdicts,penaltyand abrief description of the facts of hecase. Theform ismaintainedaspart ofhecasefi le andwill formthe basis of amonthly reportof TrialProcee din gs prepared for the De legateBodybyheTC's.

E. Physicalspace1. Adedicated location for serviceofChargeFormsandmain tenanceoftherDisciplinary

Program documents willbeestablished.2. Alace fortheTCowait or work outsidethepresenceofhemembersshouldbemade

available on hearingdates.3. Onlydrinks,andnofood,will bepermittedinthehearingroom.

II. Chargeand Hearing ProceduresA. ChargingProcedure

1. TheChargingPartyshall fi le awritten specific Charge (whichmay contain multipleco unt s inpersonwith the DisciplinaryProgramstaffmember(s)esignated bytheDoOviaemai lsent to anaddress designated by theDoO rbyfirstclass mail orcourieraddressed ordelivered to the DoO t395 HudsonStreet, Floor, NewYork,NewYork.The Chargeshall state theperiod ordate of thealleged mis cond uct and statefactssufficient to givereasonable notice ofhe conduct in question. ForCharges filedbytheReviewOfficer, misconduct meansconduct described inSection5.fofheStipulationandOrde r.

2. With the exceptionof he R ndIGO,llCharging Partiesmust usethe uniform ChargeFormprovidedbytheDistrict Council. Chargeswill not be accepted bythe DoO unlessthecorrect formis used. Asup ply ofCharge FormsfortheChargingPartyto completewill be available attheSecurityDesk on the Floor of395 HudsonStreet,NewYork,NewYorkandontheDistrict ouncilwebsite. If an incorrectformis received, itwillbereturned tothe ChargingParty withacopy of hecorrectform.Pro vided thatthecorrect

Page f12


25/60

formis received within10businessdays, twill bedeemed to have been filed asofhedate of he filing ofhe initi al incorrect)form.

3. TheDoOstaffshalllogthe Charge, assignanumber to the matter, open afi le forthematter,obtain theaddress es)ofheRespondentfromDistrictCounciland-Benefit-Fun4databasesandwithin five(5) businessdays sendacopyofthe Chargewith tsmatternumber, aplea form,and acopyofthese procedurestothe addressof heRespondentmaintainedbytheDistrict Council. The ChargingPartyshallinclude on the Chargeanemailaddressby whichs/hemaybecontacted forall purposesrelated to the matter.

4. A Disciplinary Program staff member willprepare anAffidavitof ervicetodocumentserviceofheCharge.TheAffidavitand any supportingdocuments e.g., returnreceipt)willbemaintainedaspart ofheCase File. Apacketconsisting of he Affidavit and anysupporting documents will beprepared for everytrial and be introduced asastandardexhibit designatedasTPxhibit 1.

5. A entral locationwill be established atthe DistrictCounciltoreceive all ChargeForms,which must bedatestampeduponreceipt bytheDistrictCouncil. Begi nning Ju ne 1,2013, hedatestampplaceduponincoming ChargeFormswillcontrolforpurposes ofdetermining compliance withtimelinessrequirements.

6. Emailfiling isacceptable and will be stampedas received onthe same dateONLYifreceivedBEFORE 4:00pm.Emailfilingsmust havethecorrect ChargeFormortheywillbe rejected. Correctedformswill beemailed,as above.)Charges filed in personmaybefileduntil closeofusiness.

7. Charges sent by regularUSPSrothermail willbeconsideredfiledasofhe postmarkdateif itislegible,or thedatestampedasreceivedinOperations,if thepostmarkis notlegible. TheChargingParty mayprovidedocumentati ontoprov emailingwithintheproscribedtimeif hereisanissue,andifthepartyreceivedareturn receipt.

B. FirstReadProcedure1. FirstReads will take placeon the 2dThursdayof very month.The FirstReadis not

opento anyoneexcept the parties,theTC epresentativesofhe RO heCCO nd theDoOtaff . All caseswill be reviewedsolely on thefiledpapers forfacial sufficiency.

2, Onhe FirstReaddate,partieswillberequired to signinatthesecurity deskandindicateonthatform whether theyare interested in apossiblesettlement. Aisciplinary Programstaff memberwillspeakwithal l parties,ensure thatea ch has arrivedandregistered,fac ili ta te settlement by bringing theparties together(but notcounseling them), andalertthe TC s towhich cases are ready to be reviewed.

3. TheFirstRead will beconducted bythe assigned TC. If the charges) meettherequirementsofection52ofheUBConstitution,theTChall refer thecharges)totheTrial Committee for a hearing. IftheTCfindsthatachargedoesnotmeettherequirementsofection52ofheUBConstitution,the TC illdismissthecharge.

Page5f12


26/60

4. The TC illcompleteandsigntheFirst ReadResult Form. If he TCismissesaharge,s/hewill documentthereasons fordismissalontheFirst ReadResultForm. The FirstReadResultFormwill be aninternal documentandkeptas partofhecase file. DoOstaffmember will notifythepartiesofheresults Co pi es ofhe First Read ResultFormsshallbegiven tomembersof heExecutiveCommittee,heDoOndtheCOO o review.

C.Rulesfor th e Conductofhe Hearing1 TheDoOhall providereasonable writtennotice of irst Reading andtrialschedulesto

theparties2. TheTChallsitas thevoice of heTP,ndhas the authority andresponsibilitygranted

herein.3. Unles sotherwise stated herein,the hearing shall be conducted pursuantto an d in

accordance with therules andproceduresgenerally applicableunderSection 52J ofheConstitutionof heUnitedBrotherhoodofCarpenters andJoinersofAmericaandassetforth inthe Charge s, Trials andAppeals manualofthe United Brotherhood ofCarpentersandJoiners of AmericadatedMay 2011.Intheevent ofa conflictbetweentherules andproceduresestablishedunderSection 52J ofthe UBC Constitution and/ortheCharges, Trials andAppeals manualand theserulesofrial procedure,then theserulesshall prevail

4. Affidavitsshall be received in evidence butwill be accorded less weight thanlivetestimony. Direct testimonymaybe accomplishedvia affidavit andaccorded the samewei ght aslive testimony if theaffiant is availablefor cross-examination.Witnesses shallbe placed under oath.

D. TrialProcedure1 The TC hall ruleonallissuesofrocedure, evidence,decorum andanyothermatterthat

requires adecisionregardingprocedure, evidence,andmainte nan ce of serious, fa ir anddecorous environment. Anyexception toany rulingofhe TC mustbepreservedontherecordif t istobetakenasamaterial pointarguedonappeal.

2. Inamatterwherea memberha spleadedguiltyvia PleaForm,thehearing shall onlyinvolvethe penaltyphaseofhematter.

3. In the event that a Respondent fail stoappearat trial therewillbe anassessment ofproperservice by the TC andiftheTCdeterminesthatthe Respondent was properlynotified in accordancewiththe UBConstitutionandthese rulesof rial procedure,theTCill determinethattheRespondentwill be tried in absentia.Inthat event,the TCillstate the reasonsonthe record, the Operations Affidavit ofServiceand accompanyingdocumentswillbedeemedadmittedinto evidenceasTPExhibit #1,nd become partof

Page f12


27/60


28/60

evidence.TheTCmay initsdiscretionpermitthepartiestoofferfurtherrebuttalorsurrebuttal evidenceinthis pattern. Intheinterestof ustice,the TCmay permiteitherpartytoofferevidenceuponrebuttal whichisnot technically ofarebuttalnaturebut more properlyapart ofhe offering partysoriginal case.

k. Atheconclusionofheevidence heRespondent may deliver asummation to theTP.

1 TheCharging Partymay thendelivera summationtotheTP.m. Upon theclosing ofhe recordand regardless of hetheraRespondentmakes the

request, theT illreviewthesufficiency ofproof and dismissany Chargethatunder anyreasonable interpretation ofthe evidence admitted is clearly notsupportedbyapreponderanceofthe evidence. TheT willthensubmittheremainingChargesothe TP.

n. TheT willgive anyclosinginstructionsasto theremainingcountsto beconsideredbythe TPandtheTPmustthenr tir todeliberateandrenderaverdict. TheTCwillno tbe present forthedeliberationsbut mayre-entertheroomupon request oftheTPtoansweranylegal, proceduralorsubstantivequestionsandwillnotrenderanopinionasto the verdict.

o. Uponthe TPreachingadecision,theparties willbecalledback to theroomtohearthe decision.

P.

q

Ifthe verdictis notguilty, theparties willbeexcused by theTC.Iftheverdictis guilty, eachpartywillbegivenanopportunity to beheardon what s/hebelieves is anappropriatepenalty. The TPillthen beadvisedbytheT ofanydisciplinary history oftheRespondentandtheparties will be excuse dfrom theroom. TheTPwillimposeapenalty consistentwith theserulesand theUBCConstitution, the ConsentDecreeandStipulationandOrder enteredin thismatteronJune3 2010. The TPmayreview thelogofoffenses andpenaltieswhendeter mi ning appropriate penaltyrecommendations TheTCwill remainforthediscussionof hepenalty,butwill haveno vote.IftheTCelievesthat thepenaltyimposed bytheTP s notconsistentwith theserules, the UBCConstitution, the Consent Decree and Stipulation or isirreconcilablyinconsistent withpenaltiesimposed for similar conduct inpreviousproceedings theTCshall notacceptthe penalty and will directthe TPtoreconsider after givingthemappropriate instructions.If he TCelieves,aftertheTPhas beengivenanopportunity to reconsider,that thepenalty imposedby theTPremains inconsistent,theTCmayrejectthatpenaltyand imposeonethatisconsistentwith theUBCConstitution, theConsent DecreeandStipulation andwit h penalties imposedforsimilar conduct in previous proceedings. Incaseswherethe T findsit necessarytoimposeasubstitutepenalty,theT shallprepare areport describing the penalty(ies) imposed bythe TP whythe

Page f 2


29/60

penalty(ies)wereinconsistent andsettingforth thepenaltyimposedtogetherwiththereasonswhyit is consistentwiththerules and priorproceedings. Thereportwillbeprovidedtothe CCO eneral Counse landthe IG.

r Theparties willbe calledback intotheroomto hearthedecisionon penalty. TheDoOstaffwill prepareaTrialVerdictandPenaltyletter formallyadvising thepartiesofheproceedings outcome. In the caseof guilty verdict, the time forfilinganappealwill star t torunfrom thedateof theTrial VerdictandPenaltyletter

s TheTChallrecord thedispositionofheChar ges andpenalties. The DoOhallkeepalogofCha rg eswherethe Respondenthas beenfoundguilty,andthepenalties imposed. Everysixmonths, theCCOwill review thelogofoffensesandpenaltiesto ensure thatpenaltiesrecommended for similaracts ofisconductarereasonablyconsistent. Thelog ofoffensesandpenaltiesshallbe madeavailable to TPs to review when determining appropriate penaltyrecommendations.

E RepresentationandAdvocacy1. TheChargingParty and theRespondentmay berepresentedin a mannerwhichconforms

tothe UBCConstitution,except thataRespondent mayberepresented byan attorneywho neednotbeamemberofheUBCwhentheChargehasbe enfiledby theReviewOfficer.

2. TheReview OfficerandtheIGOmayberepresentedbeforeaTP byadesignee. AllotherChargingParties mustappear inpersonat TrialortheCharge willbe dismissed.

F.Recordationof roceedingsandPreservationofxhibits1 The proceedingsbefore the TPshallbe recordedandtranscribedbyaqualifiedcourt

reporter.Theexpense ofhecourt reporter shall bepaidbythe District Council.2. TheDoO shallprovidefor the securityof all exhibits admittedinto therecordofa

proceedinguntil such timeasapartywaives appellaterightsor saidexhibits shallnolonger be needed as partofanyappeal. Thereafter,they maybe disposedofinaccordancewiththeDistrictCouncilsdocumentetention policy.

G WitnessesandDocumentaryEvidence1. ACharging Partyor Respondent may request thatamemberofalocalunion aff ili ate d

withtheDistrictCouncilappearat ahearing asawitness. TheChargingPartyorRespondentmustsub mit therequestinwriting totheDoOandprovide thenameandlocal union aff ili at ion ofthemember requested toappearalongwiththedate ofthehearing. The request mustbesubmittedtotheDoO noless than sevendayspriortothehearing. TheDoO orhisdesigneemustwithintwo2) business days of receivingthe

Page9f12


30/60

request mail alett ervia fi rst class ma il inf ormingthe member of hedate, timeandplaceof he hearing, andthat his orherpresence has beenrequestedbytheChargingPartyorRespondentto appearat thehearing.TheDistrictCouncil cannotcompel any membertoap pe ar asawitness,norcanthe TCraTP.

2. Thereis nocompelledproduction oforright to discoveryof documentaryevidenceorother tangibleitemsandno inferencemaybedrawnbyanyperson sdeclining to makesuch matteravailable to any litigant orthe TP.

H. RequestsorAdjournment ofaHearingA party to a mattermayrequestthatahearing date berescheduled by theTC The firstsuchrequest byanypartyshallbedirectedto theTCndshall be grantedonashowingofgoodcause.Thereafter the matter mayonly be adjournedinthe discretionofheTC All requests for suchrescheduling mustbe submittedinwriting via email or irst classmail to theTCwithacopytothe DoO ssoonaspracticable andcopi ed to anyotherpartybysimilarmeans.Therequestshall describethe reason fortheadjournment andsuggest dates forthe hearingto occurorbecontinued.The requestermay conferwith the op posi ngparty,ifpossible, to deter min e theavailabilityof hesuggesteddates. TheTChalldecide whet her tograntthe requestor not, andadvise the partiesinwriting oftsdecision.If therequestis granted,theTC hall setadateforthe hearing to beginor resume whichsh ouldnot be morethantwenty dayslaterthan theoriginalhearing dateorthelast dayofhe hearing prior toadjournment.

I.Location of HearingsandAttendanceUnlessnoticeis given of an alternatesuitable location, ll hearings conductedpursuanttotheseprocedureswillbe held at the DistrictCo uncil ,395Hudson Street,NewYork NewYork.Allhearings in which theReview Officerisa party shallbeopentothepublicsubjecttoreasonablesecurity considerations androomoccupancy limitations setbytheCity ofNewYork.Allotherproceedingswill beclosed tothe publicand to members who arenotpartiesJ.SettlementofCharges

1. TheReviewOfficer mayagreeto se tt le Chargesfiledbyhis officeat anytime priortothe issuance of adecision byaTPandsuch settlement shall not be subjecttoany furtherrev iew orconsideration.TheReviewOfficermayalso settle prospectivechargeswithanymemberatherthanfiling suchcharge swiththeDoO.

2. Charges broughtbyamember ncludingtheIGO maybesettledatany timebutaftertheopening ofaril onlywiththeapprovalofhe TC

Page10 f12


31/60

K Appeals1 arty toamatterconducted pursuanttotheseprocedures mayappeal adecision issuedby the TPwhere exception has beennoted on the recordof he proceedings)pursuant to

Section 53 ofhe UBConstitution. Ifatimely appealisnotfiledthedecisionof he TP(includingany related or incorporatedrulings)shallbefina l ppeals ofa notguiltyverdict renderedbya TP are notpermitted.

2. Itshall be theresponsibilityofhe DoOtotimelyprovidetherecordofheunderlyingproceedings to theUBC ppe als Committee afterreceivingnotice fromthe Appe alsCommittee thatanappealhas beenfi led

L.Preservation andInspection of rialRecordsandthe Docket1 The District Council shall preserve electronic copies ofthe transcripts ofall TPproceedingsfor aperiodofotlessthan six years.2. Uponthe completionof a matter,a partyto aproceedingmay askthe DoOviasigned

letter for anelectroniccopyofhetranscriptofhe proceedinginwhichs/he wasa party.The DoOhall promptly provideabonafide requester with such electroniccopy.

3. TheDistrict Councilshall keepanelectronicrecord ofll decisionsofhe TP andshallholdand preserve the writtendecisionsof he TP n eachmatterafter havingscanned an ddigitized said documentfor theelectronic record. Anymember mayinspect saidelectronicrecordforanylawful purpose during business hourswith an appointment.

4. TheDoOshallimplement andmaintaina docket of llTP proceedingswhichmustbepostedontheDistrict Councilwebsiteand available forinspection by all membersoflocalunionsaf filiated with the DistrictCouncil.Saiddock et mustcontainthe title of llcases, the indexnumber of ac hcase, citationstothe charges at issue,an darecordofhedisposition and penaltywhere applicable.

III Charges by ReviewOfficerA.WhenChar gesare filedbythe ReviewOfficer,the TPwillconsist of llthreeTrial

Chairs.B.When theRespondentfaces Ch arg es brought by theReviewOfficer, s/he may be

representedbyanattorneywho s not amemberofheUBCC. There is noadditionaldiscoveryand the trialproceduresestablishedaboveremain the

same.D.TheTCs will hear thematterenbancandwill decideguiltorlack thereofbymajority

vote.Ifthere isaverdict ofguilty therecommendedpenalty willbe determinedbya

Page11 f12


32/60


33/60


34/60

From: Dennis Walsh [email protected]:Motion to rescind voteadopting th e ROs recommendation reg ard ing the TC Rules

Date:September13,2 13t12:07PMTo:SteveMcInnis sm [email protected]) SMcinni s@nycdistri ctcouncitor gCc:James Murphy [email protected]) [email protected],JoshLeichtJosh@ijla ssociates.c orn, BridgetRohde

[email protected], JackMitchell [email protected], O Flahe rty [email protected], [email protected], Matt Walker MWalker @nycdistrictcounc il.org, Scott [email protected]

understandthat anattempt wasmadeat last nights delegate meeting to rescindthe delegate body s adoptionof the ReviewOfficer srecommendation to adopt revised Trial CommitteeRules.The recommendation wasmadepursuant o Paragraph5. hof the Stipulation andOrder enteredon June 3,2010, nthematterofU.S. , District Council,90iv.5722SDNY)(RMB).Onceadopted,he delegate bodyhas noauthority to amendsuch implemented recommendationsf the ROto,for example,he DC Bylaws or TCRules whichbecome incorporat ed inthe DCBylaws) made pursuant o a provision of theStipulation and Order.Thenly method that maybe used by he DC o change the TCRules henceforth isby anamendment f the DCylaws andthe mandatory notice and approvalprocess) rbymotion to Judge Berman.This w ll confirmthatthe vot e in ques tion ishereby vetoedas a iolationof theStipulation and Order, Paragraph 5b ii i(c and e).Dennis M. WalshReviewOfficer

LawOffice ofennisM Walsh415Madison Avenue, 1 h FloorNewYo rk, Y 17646.553.1357clwalsInc4clennisinlvalsh.c:orn1,i IVICtiC1117i81111VtliSh.COM

This emails confidentialandmaycontainlegally privilegedcommunications. 11 mayheviewed and usedolely by the intendedrec ipient(s). If ouhave receivedit inerror,please destroyit andotilVthesender


35/60

EXHI IT


36/60

o ursW orke d

7/1/13

93 013

Annuity

6. 3 i ll i o n 6 .1 )

A p pre n t ic e s hi p

. 1i l l io n

5 . 9 )

Pension

. 9 il l i on 5 . 7 )

V a cat i o n

. 1 ill i o n 6 . 0)

W elf a re

. 9 ill i on 5 .6 )


37/60

EXHI IT


38/60

1-0/09/2013 14:59 2025435724 UBCGPOFFICE PAGE 06/09

UNITE BROTHERHOODQFCRPENTERS NDOOINERSore MERIC

DouglasJ. mcearronGeneralPresidentOctober 9,2013

fi t)REGULARVIAJL,AIYD RNECEIPTREQUESTEDMr.oe Nina

Dea r Sir andBrother:Iam nreceiptof ourett er dated July 15,2013 herein referredtoastheProtest)filedpursuanttoSection53GofheUBConstitution.Section530 rovides,npart, hat ,(a)11

protestsdirectedtotheconduct ofominationsorelections, relectionprocedures, nanysubordinatebodymay beappealed,to the, eneralPresident within thirty.(30)daysfromthe dateofhe election. Youwrotetoprotesttheelectionconductedonor about June 19,013 ,byLocalUnion157 ordelegatesto theNeworkity is tri ctCouncilofarpenters DistrictCouncil),oneExecutiveCommitteemember ndonerialCommittee member. LocalUnion157saffi lia ted with the DistrictCouncil.

Yourotested theelectiononseveralgrounds.AUBCistr ict RepresentativewasassignedtoinvestigatetheProtest, Thisis myecisionwithrespect to the Protest.

Pix st, youclaimthatmembers Greg elty Kelly)ndWilliamWalsh Walsh)renot li gib letorun fordelegate positions.Youssertthat Keltyiscurrentlyre ti red andcollectingaension. YoulsoassortthatWalsh had alreadybeenruled inel igi ble by his of fic e,referencingmyette r ofebruary19,03,3 toWal sh .KellyandWalsh wereominated,an,andwonelegatepositionsfrom LocalUnion 157otheDist ric tCouncil.

Section 31Dof he UBConstitutiondescribestherequirements forelig ibilit y,including:

Amemberanno t hold office or thepositionofelegate. f eceivinga ensionunderthe UnitedBrotherhoodofarpentersPensionPlan....;norshallthememberbe eligibleunless workingfax aivelihoodl talas sif ica tio nwithin thetrade autonomyofheUnitedBrotherhood asdefinedin Section 7 rinemploymentwhich qualifies himorherfor membership, r s depending onhetradefor aivelihood,oris employedby heorganization as aull-timeof fic er orrepresentative;

101ConstitutionAvenue N.W, Washington .C. 20001 Phone: 202)40-6205 Fax:202)43 5724040-


39/60

10 09 2013 4:59 2025435724 UBC GP OFFICE PAGE 07 09

Mr.oeNinaOctober9, 013PageNo.2The ortionof ection 31D hat providesthat,Amember annotholdoffice or the positionofDelegateor aCommittee position,r be nominatedfor office,Delegate orCommittee osition, freceivingaension un der theUnited rotherhoodof arpentersPension Plan. . italicsadded) hasbeennterpreted so as to not pertain to a o-called tools pension atthe local orcouncillevel. Thus, membereceiving apension other thana ensionunder the UnitedBrotherhood ofarpenters 1>mqionPlan would not necessarily be disqualifiedfrom holding aposition,provided that he orshe meetsll ofhe other requirements ofection 31D,

The basis ofour protestin this regard is thatWalsh and Kelty do not ati sfy the portionof ection 31Dhatprovides, nor hallthe memberbe ligibleunless workingforaivelihoodin alassification withinthe trade autonomy ofheUnitedBrotherhood as defined in Section7or inemployment whic h qualifieshimor herfor membership, risdepending on hetradefor alivelihood, oris employed byhe organization as afull-time off ice rorrepresentative .William Walsh

Based upon nformation obtained,I und that Walsh oes notmeethe requirements ofSection31D. Accordingly,hes ineligible toserve as aelegate.

Asapreliminary matter,I indthat Walsh snot lig ibl e under Section31D as someonewhos employedby he organization asa ull-timeofficer orrepresentative . Therefore, norder tobe eligible,Walshmustatisfyoner more of hefollowingrequirements: wo rking fora ivelihood ina classificationwithin thetrade autonomy of he United Brotherhood asdefinedinSection7rin employmentwhich wilifies himorherforme mbership,oris depending on hetradefor aivelihood, Walsh does not meet anyof hese requirements.

Fo rexample,Walshtoppedworking inApril 201 2, and has workedonly sporadicallysince thattime,Walsh unde rwe ntkneereplacementsurgery inMay, 012. Walsh has beencollectingaisability pension sinceNovember2012from the NewYork City DistrictCouncil ofCarpenters Pension Pl an Plan). Duringthe investigationof heProtest,Walsh explained thathe expects to undergo knee surgery again soon,but eventuallyexpects to return to work ull-time. Walsh lsoworked or three different companies in2013. Asof une 9, 013, 112workhours were reportedto the NewYork City District CouncilBenefit Fundsbymployers ofWalsh.

Based upon the informationprovided,andthe factsandcircumstances ofhis case, havedetermined that Walsh does not meet any of he requirementsunder Section31D describedabove. Furthermore, findthat the votescastforWalsh, whoshouldnothavebeen a andidate,affected theoutcome of he LocalUnion157elegate election. Accordingly,the Protest sgrantedwith respect toWalsh. Therefore, I shall informtheLocal Union thattheelectionconductedfordelegatesfromLocal Union157 o theDistrict Councilis null and void.


40/60

10/09/2013 14:59 2025435724 UBC GP OFFICE PAGE 08/09

Mr. oe NinaOctober 9, 2013Page No.3Furthermore,I hall direct the Local Union o conduct a new election,without Walsh's name onthe ballot,for all delegate positions from Local Union 157 o the District Council.Greg elly

The investigation established thatKelly has been receiving a monthly pension benefitfrom the Plan since 2012. (There s no allegation that Kelty is receiving a ension benefit underthe United Brotherhood of arpenters Pension Plan.) Kelly also works for a company alled Al-Lee nstallation,Inc. ( ALIF') ALII s signatory to collective bargaining agreements with theDistrict Council, he Northeast Regional Council of arpenters,and the UBC From January 1,2013 hrough June 28, 013, elly worked 618.5 total hours with ALE Of hatamount, tappears 147.5 work hours were reported by ALII o the District CouncilBenefit Funds. At eastin the irst five or six monthsof 013, elly has earned morefrom his ALIIIemployment hanhe doesfrom the pension benefit.I have determined that,based on he faots and circumstances ofthis case only, Kelty meets he requirements of ection 31D escribed herein. Accordingly, heProtest is denied with respect TO Kelly.

You aised several other grounds n your Protest. You rotested that, [Local Union]157Election Committee Chairman Guy Giordano hadremovedfrom the offices of ocal 157 heprinted copies of oter Eligibility Lists. Based on he results of he investigation, t appearsthat the lists were used to help run he election.I find that this did not affectthe outcome of heelection,and his aspect of he Protest is hereby denied.

The emaining protest grounds hat you raised were imilarto those raised in a rotest byanother member, artin Maguire Maguire ). For he reasons stated in my esponse to Maguiredated October 9, 013 October9 etter ), hese Protest grounds are also hereby denied.A opyof he October 9 etter is enclosed for your eview and convenience,and ncorporated into thisresponse.

In summary, he Protest is denied except as to Walsh's ligibility Specifically, findWalsh was neligible to have been a andidate in the Local Union 157 elegate election,and theresults of he election were ffected as a esult Accordingly, shall inform the Local Union hatthe election conducted for delegates from Local Union 157 o the District Council is null andvoid. Furthermore,a new election mustbe conducted, without Walsh's name on he ballot,forall delegate positionsfrom Local Union 157 o the District Council.


41/60

.. 10/09 2013 14:59 2025435724 UBC GP OFFICE PAGE 09/09

Mr. oeNinaOctober9,2013Page No.4

Fraternally yours,

411/DOuglaJ.ealCarronGeneralPresident

EnclosureVIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL:cc; Ftnk O. pencer,istrict Vice President,Eastern istrict w/enclosure)

SteveMcInnis,EST NewYork City ist ri ct Councilw/enclosure)R.S.,Local Union157 w/enclosure)DennisM alsh Review Officer,New York City District Council w/enclosure)Josh. eicbt, ChiefCompliance Officer,New YorkCityDistrict Councilw/enclosure)Scott Danielson, nspectorGeneral New ork Ci tyDistrict Council w/enclosure)


42/60

Office of Dennis M. alshTheReview Officer

415 Madison Avenue,lh FloorNew York,NY0017clmwfwpverkzon.net

64 6. 55 3.13 57

November7, 013VIA EMAIL ANDFIRSTCLASSMAILGeneralPresident DouglasMcCarronUnited Brotherhood of arpenters andJoiners ofAmerica101Constitution Avenue N..Washington,D.C.20001

Re:United Statesv. District Council,90 Civ.5722 SDNy)DearGeneral President McCarron:

tha nk you forsen din g me copyof youretter ofOctober9, 013, ddressedto LocalUnion157 memberJoeNina,which decidedhisprotestto you regardingthenom inat ionandelection of William Walsh asa delegateof ocal 157.

Youfound ontherecordpresented to youhat Mr. Walsh was notligible toserveas adelegatebecausehe failed tomeet he requirements of ection 3 DofheConstitutionofheUnited Brotherhood of arpentersandJoinersofAmerica.

Asyoumayknow,ne ofmyesponsibilitiesas Review Officer is todetermine whetheror not candidatesforDistrict Counciloffice should be approved torunandrepresentthemembership. recently approvedthecandi dac y ofGreg Kelty for ExecutiveSecretary-Treasurer,who, houghdrawing his-toolspension, does work with regularity,though not ull time,or anemployeroutsidethe jurisdictionof he New YorkDistrict Council ina classificationwithinthetradeautonomyofhe Unit edBrotherhood as definedinSection7 r in employment whichqualifies himorher for membership. Mr.elty is also, inmyview,dependingonthetradeforalivelihood.

As ofune9, 013,sdetailed in youret ter ofOctober9 ,r.Walshwasollecting adisability pension (due o kneereplacementsurgery performed inMay 012)ndhad accrued112 workhours tothat pointin theyear.As understand thematter,Mr. Walsh returned to workinthetradeunderthe careanddirection ofa physicianwhodvised himthat he couldreturntowork onapart timebasisonly. haveattached a et ter dated November4,2013 receivedfrom Mr. Walsh fromthe physician who s treating him.Thephysiciandia gno sed degenerativejoint diseasein bothof Mr. Walsh's nees.Henderwent kneereplacementsurgeryinhisrightknee and rehabilitation. Thephysicianst rictlylimitedthe physicalactivities in which Mr.Walshcould engage.


43/60

Despite hisphysical limitations,and eventhoughhis strenuouswork as a union carpenterover the courseof ver25 years in thetrade was ikelya contributingfactortohiscondition,Mr.Walsh returnedtopart-time workoutof conomicnecessity wit h theunion disability pension ofapproximately 2,100 per month his only sourceof nc ome).

Insum,Mr.Walshappears to havedone whathecould tomake a ivinginthe tradedespitehis physical condition.Heualified for his union disabilitypensionbeca use of ismanyyearsworkingin the trade. e has been adedicateduni onman who has religiously attended hislocal union meetingsandwas an active delegatein theDistrictCouncil(where, syouknow, hegoal of he ConsentDecree s forthe union to be run democratically . Heas also servedfaithfully onheDistrictCouncilAudit Committee andasa local unionofficer.He s aedicatedmember of he Fraternal Orderof Woodworkers.

amawarethatLocalUnion 157 has requestedthat youreconsider the matter andtocrystalize the test to beapplied in similar casesthatmayarise.Though understandthateachmatter turns on its unique facts,I wouldbegrateful toalsoreceive anyclarificationyoumight beatliberty toprovide regardingtheproperapplication of ection 31D.

Verytrulyyours,

IZAA4Dennis M alshReview Officer

Cc: Via Email)William WalshBrian Quinn,Esq.Barbara Jones,Esq.Vincent itta Esq,US Benjamin Torrance

Encl.


44/60


45/60

nitchRarotberboobof Carpenter attbYoineroofStneritaMitchellSonntag

PresidentKevin CorriganVic ePresidentWilliamWalshRecording SecretaryHerculesReid

FinancialSecretaryGreg KeltyTreasurer

LocalUnionNo.157395HudsonStreet

New York,N.Y.10014(212)6850567 Fax:212)725 6793

ISSUED WINtTFDBRGDD Ilekirroteek rr Cr ilipENTER

tiMEWL

gosnaosgi.

VIA FIRSTCLASS MAIL ETURNRECEIPT REQUESTEDMr. Douglas McCarron, GeneralPresidentUnitedBrotherhoodofar pente rs and JoinersofAmerica101 Constitution Avenue,N.W.Washington,D.C.20001DearSirandBrother:

John CartyConductor

JohnDeFalcoWardenCharles McNally

TrusteeGerardHanrahan

TrusteeWilliam McKenna

Trustee

October23,2013

LastWednesday,October162013, ttheLocal157'sregular monthly meetingupontheirvote, was directedby Local 157' smembership to makehefollowinginquirieswithrespect yourOctober9,2013 etterto mendyo ur response, enclosed therewith,totheMaguireandNina Protests. Saidcorrespondencestatedthat youhad de ci ded thatLocalI57'selection forNewYorkCity icinityDistrict Council of arpenters delegates wasnullandvoid.

Your responsetothe NinaProtest(p . 2)tatedthatunderUBConstitution31D,BrotherWilliamWalshwasnoteligible to beacandidate for delegate.

Asomeonenotemployedbytheorganization as afull-time officer or representative, BrotherWalsh'seligibility turnsupon thelanguagewhichevaluateswhether heis

[w]orkingoralivelihood ina clssifiction within the tradeautonomyofhe UnitedBrotherhood asdefinedinSection7r in employmentwhichqualifies him orher formembershipor is depending on the tradefora livelihood.

Youfoundthat Walshdoes notmeet any ofheserequirements. Youbasedthisupon yourfindingthat 112hours had beenreported for himtothe NewYorkDistrict Council BenefitFundsasofune 9,2013.

It shoul dgowi tho ut saying thatLocal157 both in its Executivebody and itsmembershiprespectfullybut, strenuouslydisagreeswithyourfindingofMr. Walsh'sineligibility andofyour requirement that the entireelectionbe rerun because one candidate wasfoundineligible.

Nevertheless,inorderthattheLocal mayhavegui dan ce onwhen theUnitedBrotherhoodmightin future findthata memberdoesnot meetanyofhequoted req uir ements,andparticularly so that Local 157 mayake precautionsagainst theUBC'sindingthat amembern


46/60

General President McCarronOctober23,2013Pagetheupcomingre-runelection isineligibledueoa ailure tomeet any ofhe requirements, leasestate thecrit er ia:

I. Forwhenamembers workingfor aivelihood in a lassification withinthetradeautonomyof heUnitedBrotherhood, s definedinSection 7;

2. Forwhenamembersen gage d inemploymentwhich qualifies himorherformembership;and

3. Forwhenamembersdependingon thetrade fora ivelihood.henetoutsimplyand moreullythe Local157embership'squestionsare,

therefore,these: Whatsthedefinition of working foraivelihood?Whats thedefinitionofde pendingonthetradeforaivelihood? Whatuidance canyouprovidewithrespecttowhenaertainthresholdlevel ofoursofworkwillbedeemed working foraivelihood asopposedtoworking forsome therpurposewould 115hoursas ofune9,or example,nstead of12hours,beenconsideredtohaveonstituted working oraivelihood ? Whatbjectivestandardsgo ntomakinghisdetermination?

Thata membercanbeligible notonlybyworkingfor a ivelihoodbut bydependingon thetradefor aivelihood necessarilyseemsomean hatamember canbeeligible even f,intheperiodimmediatelyprior tonominations,hememberwasithernot workingatall, ornotworking whatevertherequisitenumberofourswhichwouldbedeemedsufficientin tself:werehisnot the case thecategoryofdepending would beunnecessaryonly working ndnotdepending wouldmake oneeligible.

Given thispleaseprovideguidanceonwhatbjectivecri ter ia areappliedinthe UBCJsdeterminationthata membersnot dependingonhetradeforaivelihood. Inotethatyourresponseto theNinaProtest onlytook,thenumberof oursworked,nto considerationfordetermining eligibility.PleaseindicatethebasisforyourdeterminationthatBrotherWalsh wasnot eligibleassomeone depending on hetrade. Sincetisclearfrom you r etterthat BrotherWalsh was, npart,dependingforhislivelihooduponaisability pensionprovided byhetrade(astisalsoclear thatdependingupon thetradeinBrother Wal sh'scasewasountedagainst,rather than inavorofainding ofiseligibility.Pleaseindicate howyou reachedtheconclusionthat Brother Wals h's depending onhe trade for this pension,ncombinatio n with hishoursworked, evertheless rendered himineligible.

Infindingthat BrotherWalshdidnot meetanyofhequotedel igi bili tyrequirements,younecessarilyfound thathe wasnot inemploymentwhichqualifieshim ... formembership.Inordertoavoid futureuncertainty,pleaseexplainhow BrotherWalsh workedforUBCignatoriesbutwasotinemploymentwhich qualifies him.. for membership .

ImportanttoLocal157'smemberswashefactthat you donotcite to anypriordeterminations, eithermadebyyourself r byany ofour predecessors asGeneralPresident, nwhichthesecrit eri awerenterpretedandapplied. Sohatwemayetterunderstandtheprovisions underwhichligib ilit ydeterminationsaremade,lease provideuswithall suc h prior


47/60

GeneralPresidentMcCarronOctober23,013Pagedeterminations.If his istheirstinstanceinwhicha memberwasdeemedineligiblebecauseofaailuretomeetanyofherequirements,please so ndicate.

Finally, you r statementinyour ett ertom hat[t]he nominationfor delegatesshallstand mustbeakentomeanhattheyareallowedto standi.e.,hatyouarenotformallyrenderingthem,s you enderedtheelection,null and voidr ather thanthattheInternationalunion is mandatinghat they musttand. Theatterwouldleadto absurdresultswhich w recertain yououldnothave intended: individuals nominatedinthepriorelectionwouldberequiredto be andidates intheoneupcomingwhetherthey chosetober notperhapsevenforcedto be candidatesvery muchagainsttheirwill,or whether or nottheyare currently eligibletobe nominated.It is contrarytothephilosophyandpracticeofheUnitedStatesDepartment ofLabor,hat youfound thatthenel ig ib ili ty ofne andidaterequiresa rerun of heentire election,(sincetheDOL ouldhaveordered,a rerun of he election for thesingledelegateposition. Itfollowstherefor, hatvotescast for evenone forcednominee ra nomineenotcurrentlyeligible-- as youfound BrotherWalshtobe wouldaffectthere-run electionoutcome andwouldrequireyet another rerun in whatouldbecomeanendless series of eruns.

Shouldyounotreverseyourdeterminationinthatregard,helocalunion will,becompelledtoexpend tensofhousands of ollarstorerunan entirelynew election, Accordingly,for the reasonscitedabove, fanelection formore hanone elegate positionis mandated byyou,w elievethat tisprudent for thelocaluniontonowalso con ductnew nominationstoguardagainstthe further expenditure of urresources inthefuture.

Accordingly,w do not anticipatethatyou willdisagreewith thewillof he Local 157membershiphatnew nominationsbeheld. If you do disagreeand aremandating hatLocal157notcond uc tnominations, lease indicate yourbasisforyourconclusion as well astheconstitutionalprovision thatyoucontend authorizesyoutoso mandate.

Fraternally yours,

MitchellSonntagPresident,Local157

cc: JohnTDearlo,Esq.Vincent F.Pitta,Esq.Micha el G zialo, Esq.


48/60


49/60

Dennis M. alshTheReviewOfficer90Civil5722SDNY)

TheLawOfficeofDennis M.alsh415 MadisonAvenue [ FloorNewYork, [email protected]

June 12, 2013Statementor Mav 2013

Compensation andexpenses per.b.iofhe StipulationandOrder:

Compensation:Dennis M.alsh 12 0. 3 hour sat$300er hour S-367094100(Detail attached; 10%f hetotal will not be billed $32,481.00Ple ase makethe checkpayableto TheLaw Office ofennis alsh andholdorickup.Expenses:TheJ.MitchellCompany,LLC (See attached invoice $15,000.00Pleasemake thecheckpayable to The.Mitchell Company,LLC nd ive the check to JackMitchell in the ROffice.Mintz Levin (See attachedinvoice 27,719.76Pl ea semake thecheckwithmemootation Matter 41405-001/nv. 8668980 ayabletoMintz,Levin, Cohn,erris, Glovsky and Popeo,P.C. andmail hecheck toMintz, Levin,Cohn,erris, Glovsky and Popeo, .C.,P.O.Box4539, Bost on, MA 02212-4539,Guidepost Solutions,LLC (Seeattach edinvoice) $11,449.57Plea semake the checkwithmemo otation Invoice11683 ayable to Guidepost Solutions,LLC ndmailt toGuidepost olutions,LLC,415 Madison Avenue, 11t Floor, ewYork, NY10017.Compensation and expensesper.b.iiof he StipulationandOrder:The TruxilloFirm,PLLC Bri dget Truxillo,Esq.,see att achedinvoice) 8,000.00


50/60

Please make the checkpayable to The Truxillo Firm,PLL nd eave the check with me,Jack Mitchell or Bridget Truxillo in the RO ffice.

Pursuant to Paragraph 8. . v of he Stipulation and Order ntered in this matter on June 3, 2010, he District Councilmustpay he totalamounts pecifiedin thisstatement or upplemental tatement within twenty days of eceipt. Failure to timelypay he amount pecified is a breach of he Stipulation and Orderand may e punishable as contempt of ourt. The contents ofthisstatement are stri tly confidential and may ot be used or viewed by or orwarded o any erson who s not required tosee t


51/60


52/60

Please make the check payable to The Truxillo Firm,PLL nd eave the check with me,JackMitchell or Bridget Truxillo in the RO ffice.

Pursuant o Paragraph 8.b.iv of he Stipulation and Order entered in this matter on June 3, 2010, he District Councilmust ay the totalamounts pecified in thisstatement or upplemental tatement within twenty days of eceipt. Failure to timelypay he amount pecified is a breach of he Stipulation and Order and may be punishable as contempt of ourt. The contents ofthis statement are tri tly corifidential and may ot be used or viewed by or orwarded o any person who s not required to see t


53/60

DennisM. alshThe ReviewOfficer9 Civil5722SDNY)

The awOffice ofDennis M.alsh415 Madison Avenue,1th FloorNew York,NY 0017646.5 53.13 57dinwfwaverizon.net

August9,2013StatementorJuly2013

Compensationandexpensesper.b.iof heStipulationandOrder:Compensation:DennisM.alsh 96.6hoursat$300 perhour 28,980.00Detailattached;pl easemake the checkpayable to The LawOffice of ennis alshand holdor ickup.Expen ses:TheJ. MitchellCompany,LLC (Seeattached invoice) 15,000.00Pleas emakethecheckpayable to The .Mitchell Company,LLC ndive thecheckto JackMitchell in the ROffice.MintzLevin (Seeattached invoice) 9,450.82Pleasemakethecheckwithmemo otation Matter41405-001/nv. 8676172 ayable toMintz, Levin,Cohn,erris, GlovskyandPopeo,P.C. ndma il thecheck to Mintz, Levin,Cohn, erris, GlovskyandPopeo, .C., P.O.Box 4539,Boston,MA02212-4539.GuidepostSolutions,LLC (See attachedinvoice) 4,989.2 0Pleasemakethe checkwith memootation Invoice12321 ayabletoGuidepost olutions,LLC nd mail t toGuidepostolutions,LLC,415Madison Avenue, 11thFloor, NewYork,NY10017.Compensation and expenses per R 8.b.ii ofhe Stipulationand Order:TheTruxillo Firm,PLLC BridgetTruxillo, Esq.,se eat tached invoice) 10,000.00


54/60

Please make the checkpayable to The Truxillo Firm PLL nd eave the check with me JackMitchell or Bridget Truxillo in the RO ffice.

Pursuant to Paragraph 8. v of he Stipulation and Order ntered in this matter on June 3, 2010 he District Councilmustpay he total amounts pecified in this statement or supplemental tatement) within twenty days of eceipt. Failure to timelypay he amount pecified s a breach of he Stipulation and Orderand may be unishable as contempt of ourt. The contents ofthisstatement are trictly confidential and may ot be used or viewed by or orwarded o any erson who s not required to see t


55/60

DennisM. alshThe ReviewOfficer9 Civil5722 SDNY)

The aw ffice ofDennis M. alsh415 Madison Avenue,UFloorNew York,NY 0017646.553. 1357dmwfwaverizon.net

September13,2013Statementor August2013

Compensation and expensesper.b.iof he Stipulation andOrder:

Compensation:Dennis M. alsh 104 hours at$300 per hour $31,200.00Detail attached;pleasemakethe checkpayable to The LawOffice of ennis Walshand holdor ickup.Expenses:TheJ Mitchell Company,LLC (Seeattached invoice) $15,000.00Please makethe checkpayable to The . MitchellCompany,LLC nd ivethe check toJackMitchell in the RO ffice.Mintz Levin (Seeattached invoice) $13,2 81. 79Pleasemakethe check with memo otation Matter41405-001/ nv. 8680092 ayabletoMintz, Levin, Cohn, erris,Glovsky andPopeo,P.C. ndmail he check to Mintz, Levin,Cohn, erris, Glovsky andPopeo,.C.,P.O. Box 4539, oston,M 2212-4539.GuidepostSolutions,LLC (Seeattached invoice) $1,918.93Please make the check with memo otation Invoice 12564 ayableto Guidepost olutions,LLCndmail tto Guidepostolutions, LLC, 415MadisonAvenue,11 Floor, New York, NY10017.Compensation andexpenses peril 8 biiof hetipulationandOrder:TheTruxilloFirm,PLLC BridgetTruxillo, Esq., seeattachedinvoice) $6,220.00


56/60

Please make the checkpayabletoThe Truxillo Firm,PLLCnd mail t toThe Truxillo Firm,77Watertreet, t Floor, ewYork,NY 0005.

Pursuantto Paragraph 8. v of he Stipulation and Orderntered in thismatter onJune ,2010, he District Councilmustpayhe totalamounts pecified in this statement orsuppleme ntal statement within twenty days of eceipt Fai lure to timelypay he amount pecifiedisa breach of he Stipulation and Orderand my be unis hableascontemptofourt.Thecontentsofthisstatement are st ri tly confidential and may ot be used or viewed by or orwarded to any erson whois not required to see t


57/60

DennisM.alshTheReview Officer90ivil5722SDNY)

TheLawOffice of DennisM.alsh415 Madison Avenue lthFloorNework,[email protected]

October3,2013Statementor September 2013

Compensationand expensesper.b.iofheStipulationandOrder:Compensation:DennisM.alsh,11 1.8 ho ur sat $300 erhour: $33,540.00Detailattached; lease makethecheck payable to TheLawOfficeofennisM.WalshandivethechecktoDennisWalshintheROffice.Expenses:TheJ MitchellCompany,LLC Seeattached invoice) $15,000.00Pl ease makethecheckpayableto The.Mitchell Company,LLC nd ivethecheck to JackMitchellin theROffice.Mintz Levin(See attached invoice) $22,356.94

Pleas emakethecheckwith memootation Matter41405-001/nv. 8683130 ayable toMintz, Levin, Cohn,erris,Glovs kyand Popeo, P.C.andmailthecheck toMintz,Levin,Cohn,erris,Glovsky andPopeo, .C., P.O.Box4539,Boston, MA02212-4539.Expenses er b iiofhetipulationandOrder:The TruxilloFirm,PLLC Bridget Truxillo,Esq., seeattachedinvoice) $4,630.00


58/60

Please make the checkayabletoTheTruxilloFirm,PLL ndail ttoThe TruxilloFirm,77Water Street 8th Floor, New York, Y 0005.Pursuant o Paragraph.b.iv of heStipulation and Order nteredin this matter on June3, 2010,he District ouncil must aythe totalamountspecifiedin thisstatementor upplementaltatement withintw enty daysofeceipt.Failure to timelypayheamountpecifiedisabreach of heStipulation and Orderandmaybepunishable ascontemptof ourt.Thecontents ofhisstatementaretritly confidentialand mayot be usedorviewed byor orwarded o anyperson who s notequiredto see t


59/60

DennisM. alshTheReviewOfficer9 ivil 5722SDNY)

TheLawOffice of Dennis M.alsh415 MadisonAvenue,10FloorNew York,[email protected]

November20,2013StatementorOctober2013

Compensation andexpenses per.6.1ofhe StipulationandOrder:

Compensation:DennisM.alsh 110.1 hoursat$330 perhour($1,333.00 willnot bebilled)

$36,333.00$35 ,000.00

Detail attached;le asemakethe checkpayableto The LawOffice of ennis Walshandholdor ickup.Expenses:TheJ.MitchellCompany,LLC (See attached invoice) $16,500.00

Pleasemakethecheckpayableto The.Mitchell Company,LLC ndivethechecko JackMitchellin the ROffice.MintzLevin (See attached invoice) $18 ,07 7. 11

Please makethe checkwithmemootation Matter41405-001/nv. 8686950 ayabletoMintz,Levin,Cohn, erris,Glovsky andPopeo,P.C.andmail he checkto Mintz,Levin,Cohn, erris, Glovsky andopeo, .C., P.O.Box 4539, Bo ston,MA 02212-4539.Guidepost Solutions,LLC (Seeattachedinvoice) $2,174.78Pleasemakethe checkwith memootation Invoice13518 ayabletoGuidepostolutions,LLCndmailt to Guidepostolutions,LLC,415 MadisonAvenue, 11 Floor,NewYork,NY10017.Compensationandexpensespert .b.iiof heStipulation andOrder:TheTruxilloFirm,PLLCBridgetTruxillo,Esq.,see attachedinvoice) $7,273.00


60/60

Please makethe check ayabletoTheTruxillo Firm,PLL ndmailt to Bridget Truxillo 1Riverway, Suite 1700, 777 ost Oakan e,Houston, Texas 77056,

Pursuant to Paragraph8. iv ofhe Stipulation and Order nteredin this matter onJune3, 2010 heDistrict Councilmustpayhe totalamounts pecified in th is statement or supplemental tatement within twenty daysofeceipt. Failure to timelypayhe amount pecified s reac h ofhe StipulationandOrder andmaybe punisha ble as on te mpt ofourt. The contents oft isstatementar etr ic tly confidentialand mayot be us ed orvi ewed by ororwarded o any ersonwhosnotrequired tosee t