Upload
lenthallsdamgatefail
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Settlement offer 20 may 2013 MFP-2205_001.pdfWide Bay Water Peter Care CEO WBWC Fraser Coast Regional Council FCRC Janet Campbell Property Officer Lenthalls Dam Gate Failure Lenthalls Dam Gates Crest Gates Fail Tops Gates FailDam Gate Failure Jon Williams Matthew NorbettGHD design lenthalls dam gates Howard Burrum River Flooding Torbanlea Howard Hervey Bay QLD Dam Safety in QLD inadequate Peter Allen DSR state government does not address dam safety issues.
Citation preview
M THYNNE EL MACARTNEYMEMBER OF THE KENNEDY STRANG LEGAL GROUP
20 May 2013
Without prejudice save as to costs
Partner & Writer:
Direct Line:
Email:
Our Ref:
Peter Archos
07 3231 8822parchos@thymac,com.au
PAA:1 30003
Allens Linklaters
Riverside Centre
123 Eagle Street
BRISBANE QLD 4OOO
Email: Bill.McCredie@allens,com.au
Dear Colleagues
Land Court of Queensland proceeding: Allan & Ors -v- Fraser Coast Regional Council
We refer to the offer contained in your letter of I May 2013, which offer, after its extension, lapsed at
5:00pm on 17 May 2013,
We will not, in this correspondence, address the asserlion contained in your letter concerning our
clients' claim for disturbance, Both of the parties have made their respective positions in this regard
abundantly clear,
Our clients are prepared to settle their claim in this matter on the following basis:
1, Your client agrees to pay $500,000 (less the advance against compensation of $338,913 which
has already -been
paid) to our clients in full and final settlement of the proceedings, The
payment would be made on the basis that:
(a) Our clients discontinue the proceedings in the Land Court within two days of execution
of a settlement agreement between the parties'
(b) Your client pay the balance of $161,087 to our clients within 14days of our clients'
discontinuing the proceedings, and
(c) Each party bear its own costs in the proceedings.
2. On the basis that our clients agree to settle the proceedings in accordance with the terms set
out above then your client is to:
(a) Pay a further sum to our clients of $500,000 (the further sum) paid on the following
basis:
This communication is confidential and may be privileged, Privilege is nol waived if this communication is misdirected or distributed,
lf received in enor, please contacl us and destroy all copies,
LEVEL27,12 CREEK STREET, BRISBANE QLD 4OOO GPO BOX 245, BRISBANE QLD 4OO1
P. +61 7 3231 8888 F, +61 7 3229 0855 www.thymac.com.au ABN 7s 763 es3 ee1
AFFILIATED FIRMS PRACTISING SEPARATET.Y lN SYDNhY " MELBOLIRNELiability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
I NTIRNATIONALBRISBANE. ADEIAIDI:
2539221 I
ALLIANCE/o OF IAW FIRMI
2
Allens Linklaters 21l'lay 2013
(i) the further sum is to assist our clients in the removal of the dwelling house on
the property and the purchase of a new shed and ancillary works, The
payment of the further sum is not conditional upon our clients actually
expending the sum of $500,000 in this regard; and
your client may construct a fence along or near the boundary between the
retained land the resumed land, at its own cost.
(ii)
3, The payment of the furlher sum will be conditional upon the matters set out below (to be
detailed in a settlement agreement), the material provisions of which will be as follows:
(a) Our clients' undertaking to remove the existing dwelling house on the property to a site
selected by our clients above R1,34, or alternatively demolishing the dwelling (with an
underlaking not to rebuild on the existing site), within an agreed timeframe,
(b) Until such time as your client is satisfied that the dwelling house has either been
demolished or removed to its new location in accordance with the preceding paragraph
your client is to pay our clients the further sum in increments for reimbursement of costs
related to demolition and removal upon the presentation of invoices, 0ur clients will
provide photographic evidence of removal or demolition of the dwelling house or, if that
is not sufficient, then an inspection can be undertaken by an independent building
inspector (agreed to by our clients, nominated in the settlement agreement), Within 14
days of your client being satisfied, acting reasonably, that the dwelling house has been
removed to its new location in accordance with the preceding paragraph or has been
demolished, the further sum, or so much thereof which has not then been paid to our
clients, will be paid to our clients.
(c) The settlement agreement should, in our view, contain a dispute resolution provision,
Obviously, the parties will have an ongoing relationship pending final resolution of all
matters and it would be inconvenient to have to return to the Court for assistance in the
event of any disagreement between the parties, We would propose that the settlement
agreement simply contain a provision that in the event there is a dispute between them
as to any factual circumstance relating to the subject matter of the settlement
agreement, then that dispute will be referred to an engineer whose business premises
are in the general locality of the property, ln the event the parties cannot agree on the
engineer to be appointed to resolve their dispute, then the appointment could be made
by the President of the Queensland Law Society lncorporated'
(d) Our client does not propose to give your client access across their propefty for the
purpose of construction of the boundary fence, We understand, in this regard, that your
client has adequate means of access to the boundary between the retained land and
the land which has been resumed,
(e) Each party is to bear its own costs of a settlement agreement to give effect to the
above, We propose that your office prepare the first draft of the agreement,
The offer contained in this letter remains open for acceptance until 5:00pm on Wednesday,22\/ray
2013.
Our clients have specifically instructed us to confirm that it is their sincere desire to bring about a
settlement of this matter if that is possible. This is particularly the case given the extremely long history
2539221 I
3
Allens Linklaters 20 May 2013
of this matter and the earlier endeavours of the parties to reach some form of mutual accommodation
including the following :
. The August 2003 Deed and its negotiation
o Mediation offered 31 October 2003
Letter Fraser Coast Council to the Allans 26 November 2003 Rejecting Mediation of terms of
the Deed
GHD report 2009
Letter Peter Allen DSR to Tim Waldron 14 May 2009
Letter Peter Allen DSR to David Wiskar 14 May 2009
Letter Deacons to Allens Arlhur Robinson 1 December 2009 requesting relocation
GHD Report 2011
0ur letter to your firm dated 2}July 2012.
Yours faithfully
Peter ArchosPartner
o
O
o
a
o
a
a
2539221_1