Upload
irc
View
622
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Building an institutional rainwater harvesting framework; the RAIN model and its challenges
Ard Schoemaker, RAIN Foundation, the Netherlands,International Symposium on Rural Water Services, 14-4-2010, Kampala
Outline:
1. The RAIN Foundation in short
2. Where does rainwater harvesting stand today?
3. Main topic: an enabling environment for upscaling (RWH)
4. Required capacities on all levels
5. Conclusions / challenges
6. Dialogue with floor
1. The RAIN Foundation in short
Implementation oriented network
Access to water, decentralised
Build capacities on multiple levels
International network
R&D, mutual learning, M&E
2. Brief overview: where does rainwater harvesting stand today?
”Steps to be taken”
RWH practiced all over,
successful technologies & results
Overcome scattered RWH projects
Structural approach to upscale and capacity building
Communicate and multiply upscaling success stories
Many lessons learned and best practices developed
Provide structural knowledge sharing and capacity development & cost reduction
More and more organisations / institutions involved
Construct institutional environment for impl/maint/manag (such as for “traditional” drinking water systems)
”Progress”
Awareness on potential and need to integrate RWH into policies increased (o.a. due to climate change)
Structurally integrate RWH into policies and government management plans.
Technical socio-organisational capacities available on specific levels
Structural building of capacities on all required levels, (univ. governments, ..)
Successful water provision on local levels
Integrate RWH in IWRM, take climate change into account
2. Where does rainwater harvesting stand today?
”Steps to be taken””Progress”
3. An enabling environment for upscaling RWH (theoretical framework)
Technology: low cost, simple, manageable,
sustainable
Implementation programmes /
suppliers
Institutional environment;
organisations that can develop, policies,
technologies, programmes
Funding & Financial
mechanisms
Knowledge & capacities: on different levels
RWH embedded in policies and water management plans
Implementing partners
Govern-ment
Rainwater Harvesting Capacity Centre
Users
Providers / chain
Knowledge institutes / universities
International levels, policies, funds, programmes
MFI’s / banks
ODA’s
RA
IN Enabling environment (on national level) to ensure sustainability and continuity of RWH on country level
National multi stakeholder group
Technology: low cost, simple, manageable,
sustainable
Implementation programmes /
suppliers
Institutional environment;
organisations that can develop, policies,
technologies, programmes
Funding & Financial
mechanisms
Knowledge & capacities: on different levels
RWH embedded in policies and water management plans
3. An enabling environment for upscaling RWH (practical implementation)
Underestimated need to
develop ca
pacities o
f the
overall s
ector
Financing Institutions
People living in rural and unserved areas
Government
Central Coordination & Monitoring Body
District and Local implementing organisations
Knowledge & Research Institutes
District and Local RWH service centres
3. An institutional RWH framework for upscaling RWH
4. Required capacities for an institutional RWH framework - Levels
User level
Construction level, engineers, masons, technicians…
Socio-organisational level
NGO / local government level
Supplier level
Knowledge centres / universities
Governmental levels
“FIETS” sustainability
5. Conclusions - challenges
1. There is a real need for collaboration and a
mutually learning, institutional environment,
to enable upscaling and sustainability.
2. Post construction support functions should
be filled in
3. Capacities on all levels should be adequate
and kept updated, best practices
continuously exchanged.
4. Governments could/should be(come) a key
player to support this.
6. Dialogue with you
1. What is your opinion on the need of / value for such an enabling
environment? - Which other models exist, or work?
2. How to address the poorest layers, where no markets exists, LG are
often absent? Does the “background paper framework” still stands?
3. How to embed RWH in policies (on a large scale)?
4. ….
Thank youwww.rainfoundation.org