Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
September 25, 2014
1
WesPac Midstream LLC
2
Newark Container Terminal Jaxport Container Terminal American Ref-Fuel Plant Kern River Pipeline Boron LNG Plant Sunrise Power Plant
• WesPac was founded in 1998 to develop, own, and operate energy infrastructure projects
• Historically, a developer of tank farms, pipelines, marine terminals , rail off-loading, and airport fuel facilities
• Broaden our focus over time to include LNG, NGL, and gas processing infrastructures
• WesPac’s majority owners are Oaktree Capital and Highstar Capital , a $86 billion diversified investment firm with deep expertise in energy investing and development, with significant ownership positions in Kinder Morgan, Ports America, Advanced Disposal Services, Wells Fargo and FirstBanCorp
• WesPac’s minority owners are WesPac’s management and Clean Marine Energy (CME) which offers financing and LNG conversion technologies to the shipping industry
Why WesPac?
Infrastructure based company• Build, own and operate
Development, construction and operating • North American presence
Financial strength• Major financial backing
Focused on emerging markets• Marine, power, mining, on road, utility
Alaska - portfolio approach• Upstream, midstream and downstream
Alliances with major international LNG players• Commodity, shipping, container, distribution
3
Wespac’s LNG Development Projects
4
Recent Developments for WesPac and TOTENew LNG Ships – Marlin Class
WesPac/AGL developing LNG project for TOTE in Jacksonville, FL
• 1st LNG bunker vessel
• 1st LNG container vessel
• 1st LNG supply dedicated to marine operations
WesPac working with TOTE to formulate LNG fueling options in Tacoma & Alaska
Orca Re-Engine
5
WesPac’s Primary Objectives
• Build, own and operate a new scalable mid-sized LNG project in the Cook Inlet
• Establish LNG alternative for Fairbanks and Interior markets
• Create new gas markets in rural and coastal Alaska by displacing diesel
• Offer a competitive gas peaking alternative for “railbelt” communities
• Develop in state optionality (LNG by truck, pipe, rail, vessel and “wire”)
• Own and commercialize stranded Cook Inlet gas reserves
6
WesPac’s Secondary Objectives
WesPac and affiliates within Highstar/Oaktree portfolio have interest to build, own, finance and operate …
• Regasification
• Floating/on shore storage
• Power plants
• Distribution systems
• Rail
• Ports & Expansions
• Pipelines
7
Backup Supply & Connected Markets
8/4/13 https://maps.google.com
https://maps.google.com 1/1
Untitled
To see all the details that are visible on thescreen, use the "Print" link next to the map.
Tilbury LNG SupplyAlaska (Backup supply)
Hawaii, Asia & Bunkering
Cook Inlet LNG SupplyAlaska (Phase 1)
Possible Export & Bunkering (Phase 2)
8
WesPac’s Alaska Efforts
LNG supply for Alaska• Cook Inlet LNG
– Port MacKenzie development– EOI’s with producers
• Tilbury LNG– Bridge Supply
• Distributed options– Vessel, rail, trucks– Floating/onshore storage– ISO’s and bulk
Rural Alaska marketing• Door to door
– Ketchikan to Dutch Harbor
• Work with DNR, DOR, AEA, AIDEA• Legislative outreach• Assisted AEA in LNG study• Power conversion studies
Export• Major Asian markets identified
Local Utilities• LTGSP Group RFP• MEA - Eklutna
9
WesPac’s Offer
Deliver reliable and affordable LNG to Alaska’s communities at a net savings relative to the cost of diesel
Supply + Jetty + Transport + Regas + Distribution + Conversion < Diesel Cost
WesPac offers turn key solutions – Wellhead to Burner tip
Upstream
• Produced & feed gas, production platforms and processing
Midstream
• Pipelines, liquefaction and storage
Downstream
• Receiving/regas, storage and distribution
• Power conversion and repowering
10
Cook Inlet Production
Quantum turnaround in potential delivery of Cook Inlet gas …
• Hilcorp has significantly increased gas production
• Independents continue to find incremental gas
• Gas supplies are robust and growing
• New markets are necessary to monetize the gas
• WesPac received five (5) EOI’s for term gas supply
• Pursuing equity in Cook Inlet gas reserves
11
Port MacKenzie – Project Location
12
Port MacKenzie Attributes
Ideal location for LNG• Existing port
• Abundant Land
• Minimal impact
• Gas pipelines
• Power transmission
• Rail lines
• Truck access
• Marine access
• Peaking for utilities
• Growth opportunities
Ideal Location
13
Port MacKenzie Update
Development approach• Speed to market• Minimize permitting timeline• Tie LNG production to reserves• Offer LNG by multiple transport methods
Site Development• Integrate the Port and WesPac’s
development plans• Address 3rd party concerns
Cook Inlet Gas Production• Five (5) EOI’s representing between
138,000 MMbtu/day and 340,000 MMbtu/day
Active due diligence• Dispersion, labor, marine, ice, geotech,
land and right of way, power, pipeline
Alaska Railroad• Strategically-aligned• Cooperative and mutually beneficial
Permitting plan• Developed preliminary plan• Proposed engagement with DNR
Economics• Developed “bare bones” rates for Phase 1• Competitive Pricing without state support• Developing preliminary rates for a Phase 2
mid-scale project
Alaska markets • Utility, marine, rail, industrial and truck
markets identified• Competitive transport rates• Peaking gas desired in Railbelt
14
Overview of Project – Phase I
Phase 1 – Small scale project (serving in-state markets, COD early 2017)Preliminary Design Capacities
• 25,000 MMbtu/day (300,000 GPD) or .16 MTPY (113 mm gals per year)
• .25 BCF to 1 BCF storage (subject to regas)
– 120,000 MMbtu/day regas (utility function)
• 16” pipeline to ENSTAR
• Truck & ISO-Container loading racks
ISO containers
• Top pick or crane loading/unloading for rail, truck and marine operations
• Up to 200 - 300 ISO containers in circulation
Railcars, trucks and vessels
• Commercially available and/or dedicated
Rail to Fairbanks
• Direct via rail extension
• Intermodal by truck/vessel as necessary
Existing dock with minor modifications
• No cryogenic pipeline
• Non exclusive use of dock for LNG
• Multi purpose dock subject to USCG, state and local codes
15
Overview of Project – Phase II
Phase 2 – Mid Scale (serving in-state + COD mid 2018)Preliminary Design Capacities
• 150,000 MMbtu/day or 1.1 MTPY
• 2.2 BCF storage
• 120,000 MMbtu/day regas (utility function)
• 16” pipeline to Enstar
• Truck loading racks
ISO containers
• Top pick or crane loading/unloading
• Up to 300 - 400 ISO containers in circulation
Smaller LNG carriers (65,000 m3 vessels)
• Dedicated LNG vessels for bulk export
Railcars, trucks and vessels
• Commercially available and/or dedicated
Rail to Fairbanks
• Direct via extension
• Intermodal by truck/vessel as necessary
Existing dock with major modifications
• Requires cryogenic pipeline for vessel loading at dock
• Requires exclusive & dedicated dock per USCG/FERC/State/local regulations
16
Preferred Site
17
Port MacKenzie – Planned Improvements
18
Port MacKenzie Facility Renderings
19
Preferred Site Intermodal + Regas
30,000 MMBtu/dayLNG Liquefaction
Facility
1 BCFLNG Storage Tank
195'x56'
ISO ContainerRail Loading
ISO ContainerShip Loading
Truck LoadingRack
120,000 MMBtu/dayRegasification Unit
Estimated Locationof Proposed Rail
20
Preferred Site with Bulk Loading
Point MacKenzie - LNGWesPac Midstream
6 - 25,000 MMBtu/dayLNG Liquefaction
Facilities150,000 MMBtu/day Total
80,000 m3LNG Storage Tank
255'x56'
21
Cook Inlet LNG – Phased Approach
Cook Inlet LNG maybe developed in Phases
• Phase 1 – up to 25,000 MMBtu/day for local markets
• Phase 2 – up to 150,000 MMBtu/day for both local and export markets
FERC License• Phase I does not require
FERC licensing if all in-state
• Phase 2 would require FERC licensing if exports and interstate are included
Export LNG vessel in the 65,000 m3 range
22
Project & Site Assessment
23
WesPac has performed a fatal flaw analysis to ascertain the strength and suitability of the project and the Port MacKenzie site. This analysis includes …
Fatal Flaw Analysis Result
Natural Gas supply
Pipeline & Electrical Transmission
Small power plant viability for self-generation
Health, Safety & Environmental Review (LNG dispersion analysis)
Suitability of barge & current dock
Geotechnical review for site suitability
Cook Inlet Ice Review for marine access
Labor availability assessment
Rail & Road access for LNG cargoes
Customer base for LNG
Vapor Dispersion Modeling
Tasks
• Braemar Engineering conducted high-level vapor dispersion modeling for primary site at Port MacKenzie
Results
• Site acceptable
• Mitigation req’s
• Site boundaries
• Potential impacts
24
Demand & Storage Assessment
25
Demand
• Fairbanks demand is exaggerated in the winter
• Storage in Fairbanks is key to managing costs and meeting demand
Storage
• A 2.2 BCF to 2.7 BCF of storage in Fairbanks could be used to balance seasonal loads and offer higher load factor
• Reallocating state funds to storage and market development could benefit overall project economics
Load Growth Uncertainty
26
• Fairbanks load growth is difficult to predict– Timing, volume, cost
• Infrastructure build out is often ahead of demand
• Mitigating fixed cost is critical
• WesPac’s low fixed cost, access to diverse markets, load sharing and storage are key attributes
Price of LNG Delivered to Fairbanks
WesPac’s forecast delivered price of LNG to Fairbanks is competitive without subsidies or offsets
– $14.37 to $14.57 per MMbtu all in delivered price
– Low reservation fee $3.96 to $4.16 per MMbtu in 2017
27Prices escalate at 2% per year
Delivered Price Assumptions
WesPac’s Total Delivered Price = Gas price + Tolling fee
Total delivered price is between $14.37 and $14.57 per MMbtu :
Tolling fee is $7.23 to $7.43 per MMbtu , (250k GPD vs 300k GPD)
Assumes return on capital, fixed and variable O & M
» $177 to $194 million capex
» 250,000 to 300,000 GPD liquefaction
» 2.5 to 3.0 mm gal full containment storage
» ~11 mw on site power plant
» ~15 mile gas pipeline
» ISO containers
» Contingencies and development fees
» Fixed and variable fees including rail and fuel
Gas price is $7.14 per MMbtu at plant gate
» Gas price is a pass through
28 Prices escalate at 2% per year
Potential Commercial Obstacles
WesPac has found no inherent obstacles and is pursuing all requirements
• Port lease
• Existing uses at Port
• Dock and jetty access
• Master Plan at Port
• Creditworthy Off-takers
• Supply assurances
• Credit
29
Next Steps
WesPac’s near term objectives (by October 31, 2014)Obtain site lease
• Negotiate with 3rd party lessees
Obtain commitments for off-take
• Fairbanks among others
Contract with Alaska Railroad
• Port MacKenzie and Fairbanks operations
Secure access to long term reserves
• Possible equity stake
Detailed permitting
• Remove potential fatal flaws from A - Z
Secure financial commitments and guarantees
• Work with State to ensure project success
30