30
September 11, 2008

September 11, 2008. Review of process to date Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal Engage in open dialogue Test support for proposal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

September 11, 2008

Page 2: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Review of process to date

Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal

Engage in open dialogue

Test support for proposal going forward toward October 1

Page 3: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Listen to understand, not to reload

Share air time

Encourage and respect diverse perspectives

Be crew, not passengers

Page 4: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Early Mobilization (2004 - 2006)

Defining Vision and Values (2006 – Feb. 2008)

Configuration Brainstorming and Selection (February – June 2008)

June - Today: Refining Vision, Expanding Network, Clarifying Proposal

Page 5: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

1. What will really be different as a result of this grant?

2. What is the Public Education & Business Coalition, and how will they help improve student achievement?

3. What would the partnership with DU really look like?

4. What will ensure that we truly have a culture of excellence in our schools as a result of all this work?

5. What is this ECE or ECE-K Early Learning Center proposal, and how would it work?

6. How can parents be involved in this process?

Page 6: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Higher student achievement and stronger culture

Addresses the enrollment challenges throughout the feeder pattern

◦ Merrill’s total enrollment◦ ECE demand at all schools◦ Grade level groupings at Cory

Rebuilds sense of community cohesion across entire feeder pattern

Page 7: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

25 years old, based in Denver, known across the country

Professional Development Based on improving teacher and principal practice by:◦ Build a clear and shared vision of effective instruction◦ Create systems to support teacher and student learning◦ Literacy best practices to support content

understanding◦ Curriculum Instruction Assessment Achievement◦ Build instructional leadership capacity to ensure

learning

Page 8: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 9: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Why do Community Engagement?

Why does DU engage with DPS?• We believe in creating citizens in

Denver’s Schools

• Service-Learning teaches students real skills to make a difference in their own community that they don’t learn in regular school

• College coaches gives students a perspective of the reality of post-secondary education

SuccessesOf Public Achievement Participants:

• 66% felt more connected to their community, and

• 82% desired to get involved in order to improve their

community.

• 57% of the students involved in PA reported liking school more

because of Public Achievement.

Page 10: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Community Engagement: University of Denver in DPS

Bruce Randolph School• Current Public Achievement

partnership (2007-present)– In 2007-08: 100 sixth, eighth

and tenth grade students involved

– 2008-09: 130 ninth grade students participating through required Speech and Debate course

Bryant Webster• 2005-2007 Public

Achievement Partnership– Students addressed issues

ranging from their school playground to gangs and domestic violence.

– Program was part of a leadership initiative in BW’s school reform plan

Page 11: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Elementary Partnerships• Ellis Elementary– Partnership with Earth Force– Ongoing training and support for service-learning

initiatives• University Park Elementary– Partnership initiated and led by students

• Cory Elementary– Looking to pilot Tutoring program this Fall– Working to have a team of DU Students adopt

Cory

Page 12: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Public Achievement at Merrill Middle School

• Close collaboration with Principal Stacy Miller and teachers Katy Larson and Laura Breetz

• Integration of Public Achievement into 6th grade Service-Learning elective

•Students will begin with expanding the school recycling program while learning about local and global environmental issues

• Currently running pilot; potential for expansion could include school-wide service-learning components

Page 13: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 14: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

“There is substantial evidence that results are virtually inevitable when teachers, working in teams:

• Focus substantially--though not exclusively--on assessed standards.

• Review simple, readily available achievement data to set a limited number of measurable achievement goals in the lowest-scoring subjects or courses and target specific standards where achievement is low within that course or subject area.

• Work regularly and collectively to design, adapt, and assess instructional strategies targeted directly at specific standards of low student performance revealed by the assessment data (e.g. "measurement" in math; "voice" in writing; "sight reading" in music).”

--Mike Schmoker, “Up and Away.”

Page 15: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 16: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 17: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 18: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 19: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 20: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 21: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 22: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 23: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Improvement In Average Organization Scores from February-April

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Studio Regular "X"

Pretest Avg.Postest Avg.

Page 24: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Summary Points

• Teachers used a common task and a common assessment to calibrate expectations and gather data

• Teachers focused on a single, clear goal• Teachers worked collaboratively to decide on

the best methods to improve learning• Teachers re-assessed for progress and

modified instruction based on results

Page 25: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

“I have recently written of the marked success of five whole school districts and a number of individual schools, most of them facing formidable socioeconomic challenges (Schmoker, 2001). The most arresting reason for their exceptional improvement is the simplicity of their efforts--all built around the same themes: setting goals (few in number); using data to identify areas of lowest performance; and then finding, creating, and continuously refining better ways to teach to those skills using a baseline and measuring the number of students who actually learn the specific targeted skills. (Schmoker, “Up and Away”)

Page 26: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Basic idea: use garden level at Merrill to create a self-contained early learning center for the feeder pattern (and beyond)

8 classrooms, ECE or ECE-K

Feeder pattern elementary schools could use them as affiliate ECE rooms to help meet demand

Benefits include ◦ professional development for teachers◦ self contained environment for children◦ reduction of enrollment pressure for middle school◦ feeder pattern connection

Page 27: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 28: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal
Page 29: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

Review of process to date

Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal

Engage in open dialogue

Test support for proposal going forward toward October 1

Page 30: September 11, 2008.  Review of process to date  Understand core elements of SIG/Beacon Proposal  Engage in open dialogue  Test support for proposal

School improvement driven by professional development focused on results, community engagement,

ECE or ECE-K Early Learning Center driven by both philosophical and practical concerns

Important to maintain connection among all participants to move this forward

Important to build on what is already working