34
Semiotic Analysis of Texts

Semiotic Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Semiotic Analysis

Semiotic Analysis of Texts

Page 2: Semiotic Analysis

Definition Semiotics: Study of signs;

Page 3: Semiotic Analysis

Definition Semiotics: Study of signs;

Science that studies the role of signs as part of social life;

Page 4: Semiotic Analysis

Definition Semiotics: Study of signs;

Science that studies the role of signs as part of social life;

Sign: Anything that carries meaning

Page 5: Semiotic Analysis

Definition Science that studies the role of signs as part

of social life;

Sign: Anything that carries meaning

Semiotics: Study of signs;

Text: world of signs; “an assemblage of signs (such as words,

images, sounds and gestures) constructed and interpreted with reference to the conventions associated with a genre and in a particular medium of communication”

Page 6: Semiotic Analysis

Development of Semiotics

Developed under Peirce (1839-1914) and Saussure (1857-1913) but acquired most significance under Roland Barthes (1915-1980) for his exploration of the political dimension of social communication;

Page 7: Semiotic Analysis

Development of Semiotics

Developed under Peirce (1839-1914) and Saussure (1857-1913) but acquired most significance under Roland Barthes (1915-1980) for his exploration of the political dimension of social communication;

Politics/Ideology: ‘all social behavior is political since it reflects some personal or group interest’.

Page 8: Semiotic Analysis

Development of Semiotics

Developed under Peirce (1839-1914) and Saussure (1857-1913) but acquired most significance under Roland Barthes (1915-1980) for his exploration of the political dimension of social communication;

Politics/Ideology: ‘all social behavior is political since it reflects some personal or group interest’.

Politics is another name for the clash of ideologies that takes place in any complex society where the interests of all those who belong to it constantly compete with one another.

Page 9: Semiotic Analysis

Development of Semiotics

Developed under Peirce (1839-1914) and Saussure (1857-1913) but acquired most significance under Roland Barthes (1915-1980) for his exploration of the political dimension of social communication;

Politics/Ideology: ‘all social behavior is political since it reflects some personal or group interest’.

Politics is another name for the clash of ideologies that takes place in any complex society where the interests of all those who belong to it constantly compete with one another.

Semiotic analysis reveals political values subtly concealed behind an apparently apolitical façade of a film.

Page 10: Semiotic Analysis

Semiotic Interpretation Difference between questions:

What made Beatles so good vs What made Beatles so big?

Page 11: Semiotic Analysis

Semiotic Interpretation Difference between questions:

What made Beatles so good vs What made Beatles so big?

Meaning of a thing lies largely in its relations to other things, both in its similarities and differences

Page 12: Semiotic Analysis

Semiotic Interpretation Difference between questions:

What made Beatles so good vs What made Beatles so big?

Meaning of a thing lies largely in its relations to other things, both in its similarities and differences.

By establishing these relationships, one identifies the system in which a sign works.

Page 13: Semiotic Analysis

Semiotic Interpretation Difference between questions:

What made Beatles so good vs What made Beatles so big?

Meaning of a thing lies largely in its relations to other things, both in its similarities and differences.

By establishing these relationships, one identifies the system in which a sign works.

Mythologies: systems of values/beliefs that govern our behavior in a culture, i.e., gender roles, etc.

Page 14: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

Why study semiotics:

A) It helps us not to take ‘reality’ for granted as having a purely objective existence, independent of human interpretation;

Page 15: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

Why study semiotics:

A) It helps us not to take ‘reality’ for granted as having a purely objective existence, independent of human interpretation;

B) Teaches us that reality is a system of signs;

Page 16: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

Why study semiotics:

A) It helps us not to take ‘reality’ for granted as having a purely objective existence, independent of human interpretation;

B) Teaches us that reality is a system of signs;

C) Assists us to become more aware of reality as a construction and the roles played by ourselves and others in constructing it;

Page 17: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

Why study semiotics:

A) It helps us not to take ‘reality’ for granted as having a purely objective existence, independent of human interpretation;

B) Teaches us that reality is a system of signs;

C) Assists us to become more aware of reality as a construction and the roles played by ourselves and others in constructing it;

D) Helps us realize that information or meaning is not ‘contained’ in the world or in books, computers or audio-visual media.

Page 18: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

E) Helps us understand that meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us –we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware;

Page 19: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

E) Helps us understand that meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us –we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware;

F) Becoming aware of such codes is fascinating and intellectually empowering;

Page 20: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

E) Helps us understand that meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us –we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware;

F) Becoming aware of such codes is fascinating and intellectually empowering;

G) By making more explicit the codes by which signs are interpreted we perform the valuable semiotic function of ‘denaturalizing’ signs;

Page 21: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

E) Helps us understand that meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us –we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware;

F) Becoming aware of such codes is fascinating and intellectually empowering;

G) By making more explicit the codes by which signs are interpreted we perform the valuable semiotic function of ‘denaturalizing’ signs;

H) Deconstructing and contesting the realities of signs can reveal whose realities are privileged and whose are suppressed;

Page 22: Semiotic Analysis

Importance of Studying Semiotics

E) Helps us understand that meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us –we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware;

F) Becoming aware of such codes is fascinating and intellectually empowering;

G) By making more explicit the codes by which signs are interpreted we perform the valuable semiotic function of ‘denaturalizing’ signs;

H) Deconstructing and contesting the realities of signs can reveal whose realities are privileged and whose are suppressed;

I) To decline such a study is to leave to others the control of the world of meanings which we inhabit;

Page 23: Semiotic Analysis

Results of Semiotic Analysis

Cultural Values;

Page 24: Semiotic Analysis

Results of Semiotic Analysis

Cultural Values;

Personal identity;

Page 25: Semiotic Analysis

Results of Semiotic Analysis

Cultural Values;

Personal identity;

Patterns of behavior;

Page 26: Semiotic Analysis

Results of Semiotic Analysis

Cultural Values;

Personal identity;

Patterns of behavior;

Cultural differences;

Page 27: Semiotic Analysis

Structure of Signs Saussure offered a ‘dyadic’ or two-part

model of the sign:

a ‘signifier’ – the form which the sign takes;

the ‘signified’ – the concept it represents;

Page 28: Semiotic Analysis

Structure of Signs Saussure offered a ‘dyadic’ or two-part

model of the sign:

a ‘signifier’ – the form which the sign takes;

the ‘signified’ – the concept it represents;

Signs are arbitrary; makes sense through their relations to one another, i.e., word ‘tree’ no relation to the actual object;

Page 29: Semiotic Analysis

Structure of Signs Saussure offered a ‘dyadic’ or two-part model

of the sign:

a ‘signifier’ – the form which the sign takes;

the ‘signified’ – the concept it represents;

Signs are arbitrary; makes sense through their relations to one another, i.e., word ‘tree’ no relation to the actual object;

Sign is more than the sum of its parts, i.e., the French word ‘mouton’ may mean ‘sheep’ but does not have same value.

Page 30: Semiotic Analysis

Arbitrariness of the Sign

Radical concept because it proposes the autonomy of language in relation to reality;

Page 31: Semiotic Analysis

Arbitrariness of the Sign

Radical concept because it proposes the autonomy of language in relation to reality;

Language does not ‘reflect’ reality; it constructs it.

Page 32: Semiotic Analysis

Arbitrariness of the Sign

Radical concept because it proposes the autonomy of language in relation to reality;

Language does not ‘reflect’ reality; it constructs it.

Since no one-to one link between signifier and signified, signs have multiple rather than single meaning.

Page 33: Semiotic Analysis

Arbitrariness of the Sign

Radical concept because it proposes the autonomy of language in relation to reality;

Language does not ‘reflect’ reality; it constructs it.

Since no one-to one link between signifier and signified, signs have multiple rather than single meaning.

Relationship between signifier and signified is conventional;

Page 34: Semiotic Analysis

Arbitrariness of the Sign

Radical concept because it proposes the autonomy of language in relation to reality;

Language does not ‘reflect’ reality; it constructs it.

Since no one-to one link between signifier and signified, signs have multiple rather than single meaning.

Relationship between signifier and signified is conventional;

Every sign acquires a history which are familiar to members of the sign-users’ culture;