Upload
ahburton
View
307
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Burton, A.H. (2010) Water resources management and participation – best practice in the UK and Australia, gaps and future options, Water Resources Management Scientific Network Seminar, 1-2 June 2010, IDS, Sussex University, Brighton - UKhttp://www.redectidoce.com.br/wrmdp-net/arquivos/Aaron-Burton-Wales-Seminar2010-WMRDP-Network.pdf
Citation preview
Water resources management and
participation – best practice in the
UK and Australia
Aaron Burton
WRM Scientific Network 1-2 June 2010
IDS, Sussex University, Brighton
Outline
Pressures on water resources
Sustainable development and water resources management – linking with participation
UK ExamplesRegulatory and WRM reform
Analysis of current regulation
Australian Examples
Conclusions
Proposed questions
Pressures on water resources –
Western Australia
Pressures on Water Resources - England and Wales
Demand scenarios – England and Wales
Demand Scenarios – Western Australia
Carbon mitigation
Water Resources Strategy for England and
Wales
Enough water for people and the environment: “Management and use of
water that is environmentally, socially and economically sustainable,
providing the right amount of water for people, agriculture, commerce and
industry, and an improved water-related environment”
Where does participation fit?
Participation
Definition – devolved or distributed governance, stakeholder consultation, forums, in the market, social licence
Where does it fit?
Abstraction management
Water resources planning
Retail – consumers
All of the above?
the act of taking part in an activity or event
UK EXAMPLES
Water resources management and participation – best practice in the UK and Australia
Water Resources Management – Regulatory
Reform
Future Water and WAG SPPS on Water
Cave ReviewReform abstraction, upstream and retail competition for water,
need to agree priorities – stakeholders; water quality trading and
standards (local sustainability – reduce emissions)
Walker ReviewRecommendation 65 – public involvement in future issues affecting
bills, particularly proposals for quality improvements
ProcessesWRMP – public consultation, WTP, SEA issues
PR09 – WTP
A low carbon water industry 2050
Governance architectures
Policy Areas Objectives State Market
Based
Governance Behaviour
change
Supply
Water abstraction
management
Improved allocation
to optimise social,
environmental and
economic benefits
Reduce abstraction
to sustainable levels
Maintain
sustainable levels of
abstraction and
security of public
water supplies
•Licensing
system and
CAMS
•Restoring
sustainable
abstraction
(RSA)
programme
– s51
voluntary,
s52 revoke
•Limited
licence
trading
•Abstractor groups
Public water
supply and water
industry structures
Reducing costs to
customers
Innovation and
environmental
performance/
funding
Low carbon water
industry
•Combined
water and
sewerage
licence for
undertakers
•Comparativ
e
competition
and price
review
process
•Competition
for the
market
•Statutory Water
Resource
Management
Plans with public
consultation
Water customers Reducing costs to
customers
Increasing levels of
service
•Combined
water and
sewerage
licence for
undertakers
•Consulted in
willingness to pay
and other studies
Stakeholder
inclusion within
WFD
•Consumer
advice and
representation
(CCWater)
Demand
Water
efficiency
Reduce demand and
therefore abstraction
from the environment
Reduce carbon
emissions from supply,
use and disposal
•Water Supply (Water
Fittings) Regulations
•Building Regulations
•Planning standards
(CSH, etc.)
•Ofwat targets on
water companies
•ECA tax incentives
•Small scale
projects and
tariff trials
Leakage
Management
Reduce demand and
therefore abstraction
from the environment
•Ofwat targets on
water companies
•Pressure
from media/
public
perception
Water Quality
Point source
pollution
Reduce pollution from
point sources in a cost
effective manner
River basin planning
Environmental quality
improvements
Low carbon treatment
methods
•Environmental permits
(site activities,
discharges etc.)
•Operator Self
Monitoring
•Stakeholder
inclusion within
WFD and some
catchment scale
decision making
•OPRA,
Account
Managemen
t
Diffuse source
pollution
River basin planning
Environmental quality
improvements
[WR Act 1991 - Water
Protection Zones; Anti-
pollution Works Notices]
[Groundwater
regulations 2009 –
notices]
Plant protection
products regulations,
Groundwater
regulations
Nitrate Vulnerable
Zones
CAP- Nitrates
•Subsidy based
compliance
(CAP, Farm based
grant scheme)
•Code of practice for
using
•Plan Protection
products
•Organic farming
scheme and organic
environmental
stewardship
Stakeholder
inclusion within
WFD and some
catchment scale
decision making
Land management
schemes
Pesticides forum
Pesticides voluntary
initiative
Influencing the
planning process
and LDPs
Policy Areas Objectives State Market Based Governance Behaviour change
AUSTRALIAN EXAMPLES
Water resources management and participation – best practice in the UK and Australia
Australian Case Studies
National Water Initiative – Reform measures
Addressing transboundary issues
NRM – distributed governance and links to US models
CSIRO Work
Water benefits accounting
Climate change
South West Yarragadee SA
Permanent water efficiency measures
Conclusions
Pressures on water resources require more innovative and effective management regimes
Participation is part of all management activities – gaps exist in both the UK and Australia frameworks
Regulatory reform is fast paced
Opportunity to engage water users and achieve local sustainable solutions
Questions
What is the best stage (or stages) within the policy cycle for participation to enable a more distributed governance and partnership approach to managing water resources?
How effective is participation through consultation compared to broader governance arrangements for sustainable water resources management?
What are the gaps and opportunities for participation and improved governance approaches within water resources management in the UK and Australia?
Upstream Network Retail
Thank you – Questions?