9
Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

Semantics: Warm-Up

Kareem KhalifaPhilosophy Department

Middlebury College

Page 2: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

OverviewI. Logic, linguistics, &

semanticsII. Propositional semantics:

basicsIII. Semantic validity

IV. Proof-theoretic validity & tableaux

V. ConditionalsVI. Predicates

Page 3: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

I. Logic, linguistics, & semantics

A. Logic vs. linguisticsB. Downplaying the distinctionC. Emphasizing the distinction

Page 4: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

II. Propositional semantics: basics

A. Object &meta-languageB. Syntax of object languageC. Two notions of validityD. Soundness & completeness

μετά

Page 5: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

III. Semantic validity

A. DefinitionB. Valuation rules

Page 6: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

IV. Proof-theoretic validity: tableaux

A. MechanicsB. Definition

Page 7: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

V. Conditionals

A. ParadoxesB. Pragmatic SolutionC. Subjunctive SolutionD. Tougher examplesE. Argument for “”

Page 8: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

VI. Predicates

A. Predicate logic (teaser)

B. Representing predicates

Page 9: Semantics: Warm-Up Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College

Recap• Logical tools can be of use to

linguists• Semantic theories are couched in

meta-language; object languages are models of linguistic data

• Semantic validity leans on truth-preservation

• Proof-theoretic validity focuses on rules for making moves in the object language

• Material implication is messy.• Predicates should be represented

precisely.