2
Semantics of Probabilistic Programs Approaches discussed in literature E 1 p E 2 => E 1 (with prob. p) => E 2 (with prob. (1-p)) • Probability of a specific output is not explicit. [E 1 p E 2 ]s = (p)*[E 1 ]s + (1-p)*[E 2 ]s • [E]s is a measure function from events to probabilities. • Forward or Backward? Practical Issues Backward implementation is difficult. (inverses, representation of sets). Need to be able to compute probabilities, expectations inside of the program.

Semantics of Probabilistic Programs

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Semantics of Probabilistic Programs. Approaches discussed in literature E 1  p E 2 => E 1 (with prob. p) => E 2 (with prob. (1-p)) Probability of a specific output is not explicit. [E 1  p E 2 ]s = (p)*[E 1 ]s + (1-p)*[E 2 ]s [E]s is a measure function from events to probabilities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Semantics of Probabilistic Programs

Semantics of Probabilistic Programs

• Approaches discussed in literature– E1pE2 => E1 (with prob. p)

=> E2 (with prob. (1-p))• Probability of a specific output is not explicit.

– [E1pE2]s = (p)*[E1]s + (1-p)*[E2]s• [E]s is a measure function from events to probabilities.• Forward or Backward?

• Practical Issues– Backward implementation is difficult. (inverses,

representation of sets).– Need to be able to compute probabilities, expectations

inside of the program.

Page 2: Semantics of Probabilistic Programs

Haskell Implementation

• Using type classes to realize a general parameterized type (Prob a).– Has capability to generalize to product types (a b).

• data (DomainClass a) => (Prob a) = …– (DomainClass a) is an assertion that ‘a’ must be an

instance of DomainClass.– Still must provide ‘instance DomainClass T’ declaration,

which defines functions to operate on values of type T.

• Underlying representation– Dimensions: exact/interpolated countable/uncountable– Sample sets and functions considered.