SEM Index - Judicial Academy

Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal Implications during Trial, coveringSC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds

16th

A. RELEVANT STATUTES

S. No. Title 1. Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732. Constitution of India, 19503. Indian Evidence Act, 18724. Indian Penal Code, 18605. Information Technology Act, 20006. Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 2009

7. Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 & Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2014)

8. National Security Act, 1980

9. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 200210. SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989

1. NATIONAL SECURITY ACT, 1980

A. CASE LAW

S.No. Title A. Objective of the Act

Other High Court 1. Munni Lal v. Superintendent of Central Jail

B. Delay in Sending Report to be explained, Report to be Sent

At Earliest Supreme Court

1. Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur

For Internal Circulation Only.

INDEX

Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal Implications during Trial, covering- NDPS, MCOCA, NSA, SC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds

and Cheating

th & 17th September, 2019

A. RELEVANT STATUTES

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Constitution of India, 1950 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Information Technology Act, 2000 Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 2009

Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (as amended by the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2014) National Security Act, 1980

Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989

NATIONAL SECURITY ACT, 1980

Citation Objective of the Act

v. Superintendent of Central Jail (¶¶13-24, 35) 1985 ACR 373

Delay in Sending Report to be explained, Report to be Sent

Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur (¶¶6-12) 2018 (9) SC

1

Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal NDPS, MCOCA, NSA,

SC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds

(as amended by the Narcotic Drugs

Citation

1985 ACR 373

2018 (9) SCALE 56

2. NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985

A. RULES

S. No. Title 1. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and

Members) Rules, 1989 2. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Fees) Rules, 19893. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Procedure) Rules, 19894. Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 19895. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Amendment) Rules, 20176. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,

2013 7. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)

Rules, 2006 8. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 19929. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 198810. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addi

Rules, 1985 11. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985

B. HANDBOOK

S. No. Title 1. Drug Law Enforcement Field Officers Handbook by NCB

C. REPORTS

S. No. Title a) Law Commission Report1. 155th Law Commission Report

Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances, 1985

b) Parliamentary Standing

Committee Report 1. Report No. 50- NDPS (Amendment)

Bill, 2011


NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES

Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and

Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Fees) Rules, 1989 Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Procedure) Rules, 1989 Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 1989Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 as amended by (First Amendment) Rules, 2017 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 1992Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 1988Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addi

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985

Drug Law Enforcement Field Officers Handbook by NCB

Author SourceLaw Commission Report

Law Commission Report- Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic

Law Commission of India http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101169/Report155.pdf

Parliamentary Standing

NDPS (Amendment) Standing Committee on Finance, (2011-12) Fifteenth Lok Sabha

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/10169/Report166.pdf

2

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES

Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and

Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 1989 Rules, 1985 as amended by (First

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 1992 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 1988 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addicts)

Source http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-169/Report155.pdf

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-69/Report166.pdf

c) Other Reports 1. Drug Abuse Among Children in Delhi

2. From Addict To ConvictWorking of NDPS Act in Punjab (2018) (Volume-1)

3. From Addict To ConvictWorking of NDPS Act in Punjab (2018) (Volume-2)

4. International Narcotic Control BoardAnnual Report, 2018

5. World Drug Report, 2018

6. World Drug Perception Problem Report, 2017

7. Narcotics Control BureauReport, 2017

D. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

S. No Title 1. Single Convention on Narcotic Drug,


Drug Abuse Among Children in Delhi Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy https://static1.squaresp

ace.com/static/551ea026e4b0adba21a8f9df/t/57b2b9c337c581c6e8599f28/1471330810419/Drug+Abuse+Among+Children+in+Delhi.pdf

From Addict To Convict- The Working of NDPS Act in Punjab

Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy htty.in/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume1English.pdf

From Addict To Convict- The Working of NDPS Act in Punjab

Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume2English.pdf

International Narcotic Control Board- United Nations

https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2018/Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2018_E_.pdf

World Drug Report, 2018 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)

https://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf

Drug Perception Problem Global Commission on Drug Policy

http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/GCDP2017_PerceptionsENGLISH.pdf

Narcotics Control Bureau- Annual Narcotics Control Bureau, India

https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=D210US678G0&p=Narcotics+Control+Bureau+Annual+Report%2C+2017

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

Author Source Single Convention on Narcotic Drug, United Nations http://www.unodc.org/

3

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/551ea026e4b0adba21a8f9df/t/57b2b9c337c581c6e8599f28/1471330810419/Drug+Abuse+Among+Children+in+Delhi.pdf https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume1English.pdf https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume2English.pdf https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2018/Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2018_E_.pdf https://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/GCDP-Report-2017_Perceptions-ENGLISH.pdf https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=D210US678G0&p=Narcotics+Control+Bureau-+Annual+Report%2C+2017

Source http://www.unodc.org/

1961

2. Convention on Psychotropic Substances,1971

3. SAARC Convention on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances,1990

4. United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic In Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna Convention)

E. CASE LAW

1. Combating Illicit Drug Traffic and Drug Abuse

S. No Title Supreme Court

1. Bachpan Bachao Andolan

2. Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

S. No Title A. Bhang is not a Narcotic Drug

Other High Court 1. Promodh Jha v. State of West Bengal

B. Determination of Drug Quantity by Courts Supreme Court

1. Hira Singh v. Union of India

2. Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab

3. State of NCT of Delhi v. Ashif Khan

4. E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau

C. Chemical Examination Report (Production and Proof) Supreme Court

1. Rajesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi


unodc/en/treaties/index.html

Convention on Psychotropic United Nations

http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html

SAARC Convention on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

SAARC

http://www.saarcsec.org

United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic In Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna

United Nations Convention http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html

Combating Illicit Drug Traffic and Drug Abuse

Citation

Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (¶¶1-22) (2017) 1 SCC 653

Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

CitationBhang is not a Narcotic Drug

. State of West Bengal (¶3) 2008 (1) CLJ(CAL)

685

Determination of Drug Quantity by Courts

. Union of India (¶¶9-12) (2017) 8 SCC 162

. State of Punjab (¶¶21,22,25-26) (2011) 4

. Ashif Khan (¶¶6-7) (2009) 4 SCC 42

. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau (¶15) (2008) 5 SCC 161

Chemical Examination Report (Production and Proof)

State Govt. of NCT of Delhi (¶¶ 6, 9) (2008) 4 SCC 493

4

unodc/en/treaties/index.html http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html http://www.saarc-sec.org

http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html

Citation (2017) 1 SCC 653

Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Citation 2008 (1) CLJ(CAL) 685

(2017) 8 SCC 162

(2011) 4 SCC 441

(2009) 4 SCC 42

(2008) 5 SCC 161

(2008) 4 SCC 493

2. Bhupinder Singh v. State of Punjab High Court of Delhi

1. Amarjit Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) Other High Courts

1. State of H.P. v. Mehboon Khan

2. Gajanand Alias Rajinder Prashad v. State of Himachal Pradesh 11, 13, )

D. Disposal of Contraband Supreme Court

1. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2. Union of India v. Mohanlal 3. Thana Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics 4. Union of India v. Mohanlal 5. Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal 6. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab 7. Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai

High Court of Delhi

1. Mohd. Anwar @ Annu v.

2. Manjit Singh v. State (¶¶ 3, 22) Other High Court

1. State of Himachal Pradesh

E. Rehabilitation of Addicts Other High Court

1. Sanjiv Bhatnagar v. State

3. Procedure under NDPS Act

S. No Title A. Procedure under NDPS Act

a) Possession & Presumption of Culpable Mental State Supreme Court

1. Mohan Lal v State of Punjab

2. Baldev v. State of Haryana 3. Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan 4. Bhola Singh v. State of Punjab 5. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab


State of Punjab (¶¶ 12, 13, 29-31) AIR 1988 SC 1011

State (Delhi Administration) (¶¶ 17, 18, 21) 1995 CriLJ 1623

State of H.P. v. Mehboon Khan (¶¶ 26, 30, 32, 35, 41, 42, 52, 53) 2013 SCC Online HP 4080

Gajanand Alias Rajinder Prashad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (¶¶ 7, 8, 2001 (3) ShimLC 54

Disposal of Contraband

State of Punjab (¶¶12-17) (2018) 18 SCC 540

. Mohanlal (¶¶10-14,16-17, 27-31) (2016) 3 SCC 379. Central Bureau of Narcotics (¶¶26-27) (2013) 2 SCC 590

Mohanlal (¶¶ 7) AIR 2012 SC 2653Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal v. State of M.P. (¶¶ 10, 12, 16) AIR 2011 SC 1335

State of Punjab (¶¶ 128, 129, 135) (2008) 16 SCC 417Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 7, 8, 14, 18) (2002) 10 SCC 283

State (¶¶ 9, 11, 15-17) 2011 SCC Online Del 1047

(¶¶ 3, 22) 214 (2014) DLT 646

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ivor Fleitcher (¶ 19, 24) 2005 (2) Shim LC 431

Addicts

. State (¶¶11-12) Criminal Revision Case No. 1278 of 2015 Dated: 27.01.2016

Procedure under NDPS Act

CitationProcedure under NDPS Act Possession & Presumption of Culpable Mental State

State of Punjab (¶¶17-18,20-30)

State of Haryana (¶¶ 12, 17, 19) 2016 CriLJ 154. State of Rajasthan (¶¶16, 22, 29-31) (2015) 6 SCC 222

Punjab (¶¶ 5, 8) (2011) 11 SCC 653Punjab (¶¶ 44-48, 122, 130, 138, 151, 155, 157, (2008) 16 SCC 417

5

AIR 1988 SC 1011 1995 CriLJ 1623 2013 SCC Online HP 4080 2001 (3) ShimLC 54

(2018) 18 SCC 540 (2016) 3 SCC 379 (2013) 2 SCC 590 AIR 2012 SC 2653 AIR 2011 SC 1335 (2008) 16 SCC 417 (2002) 10 SCC 283 2011 SCC Online Del 1047 214 (2014) DLT 646 2005 (2) Shim LC 431 Criminal Revision Case No. 1278 of 2015 Dated: 27.01.2016

Citation 2016 CriLJ 154 (2015) 6 SCC 222 (2011) 11 SCC 653 (2008) 16 SCC 417

158, 160, 162, 163) Delhi High Court

1. Narcotic Control Bureau

b) Section 41,42 and 43- Supreme Court

1.

Naresh Kumar @ Nitu v.

2. State of Rajasthan v. Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa3. Jagat Singh v. State of Uttarakhand4. State of Rajasthan v. Jagraj Singh 5. Sekhar Suman Verma v. The Superintendent of N.C.B.6. Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana 7. Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana 8. Gurjant Singh @ Janta v.9. Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana 10. State through Narcotics Control Bureau

22, 26, 30) 11. M Prabhulal v. Assistant Director 12. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 13. Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri

14. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh

Delhi High Court

1. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Virender Singh

2. Narcotics Control Bureau

3. Union of India v. Steaphen Andreas Hofman 4. Utpal Mishra v. Nicelai Christensen

5. Lachho Devi v. State (¶¶ 17, 18, 21

c) Section 50- Notice before Personal Search

Supreme Court 1. Arif Khan v. State of Uttarakhand

of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)2. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab 3. Makhan Singh v. State of Haryana

4. Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 5. Yasihey Yobin and Anr. v


Narcotic Control Bureau v. Allauddin (¶¶ 9-11, 13, 15) 2010 SCC Online Del 4457

- Search & Seizure

v. State of Himachal Pradesh (¶ 10) Crl. App. No. 1053/2016D.O.D:

Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa (¶¶ 13-15, 17-19, 25) (2016) 11 SCC 687. State of Uttarakhand (¶¶12-15) (2016) 13 SCC 119

. Jagraj Singh (¶¶9-30) (2016) 11 SCC 687. The Superintendent of N.C.B. (¶¶12-13) (2016) 11 SCC 368

State of Haryana (¶¶ 10-12) 2015 (12) SCALE 579State of Haryana (¶¶ 17, 19, 20, 27, 28) (2013) 2 SCC 502

v. State of Punjab (¶¶ 16-21, 23, 24, 26) (2014) 13 SCC 603State of Haryana (¶¶ 12, 15, 16) (2009) 8 SCC 539

State through Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kulwant Singh (¶¶ 13, 14, 20, (2003) 9 SCC 193

Assistant Director (¶¶7,14) AIR 2003 SC 4311State of Kerala (¶¶ 10-12) AIR 2001 SC 3190

Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 16, 17, 21-24) (2000) 2 SCC 513

Balbir Singh (¶¶ 17, 23, 25-28) (1994) 3 SCC 299

Virender Singh (¶¶ 9, 10) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6775

Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kulwant Singh (¶¶ 8-10, 12, 13) 2013 SCC Online Del 2140

Steaphen Andreas Hofman (¶ 8) 2007 (97) DRJ 410Nicelai Christensen (¶¶ 3, 8, 9) 1997 SCC Online Del

655(¶¶ 17, 18, 21-23) 1990 SCC Online Del

198

Notice before Personal Search

State of Uttarakhand (¶¶ 25, 26, 29, 30) (Where the person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)

2018 (6) SCALE 456

State of Punjab (¶9) (2018) 18 SCC 540State of Haryana (¶¶ 10-12, 16, 17) 2015 SCC Online SC

374State of Punjab (¶¶ 8, 13, 14, 22) (2015) 6 SCC 674

v. The Dept. of Customs, Shillong (¶¶9,11) (2014) 13 SCC 344

6

2010 SCC Online Del 4457 Crl. App. No. 1053/2016 D.O.D: 27/07/2017 (2016) 11 SCC 687 (2016) 13 SCC 119 (2016) 11 SCC 687 (2016) 11 SCC 368 2015 (12) SCALE 579 (2013) 2 SCC 502 (2014) 13 SCC 603 (2009) 8 SCC 539 (2003) 9 SCC 193

AIR 2003 SC 4311 AIR 2001 SC 3190 (2000) 2 SCC 513

(1994) 3 SCC 299

2018 SCC OnLine Del 6775 2013 SCC Online Del 2140 2007 (97) DRJ 410 1997 SCC Online Del 655 1990 SCC Online Del 198 2018 (6) SCALE 456

(2018) 18 SCC 540 2015 SCC Online SC 374 (2015) 6 SCC 674 (2014) 13 SCC 344

6. State of HP v. Sunil Kumar 7. State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand

person is searched without there being any search of his person, Section 50 of the NDPS Act will have no

8. Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana 9. Ram Swaroop v. State (Govt. NCT) of Delhi 10. State of Delhi v. Ram Avtar @ Rama 11. Nirmal Singh Pehalwan v.12. Narcotics Central Bureau 13. Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja

rejected the theory of “substantial 14. Dilip and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)

15. State of Punjab v. Balwant Rai 16. State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram 17. State of Himachal Pradesh

“person” under the Act means a human being with appropriate coverings and clothing and also footwear.)

18. Prabha Shankar Dubey (suspect) has to be told in a way that he becomes aware that the choice is his and not of the officer concerned, even though there is no specific form.)

19. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 20. Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana

from Search of Premises)21. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh 22. Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyed

officer conducting the search must specifically depose that he had informed the person to be searched about his right to demand that the search be carried out in the presence of a GazettedMagistrate.)

Delhi High Court

1. Sumit Rai v. State (¶¶20-21)

2. Irwin Bin Hassim v. Anil Kumar, Air Customs Officer, IGI Airport24)

3. Munnu Khan v. State (¶ 6)

4. Mansoor Ahamad Khan v.5. Sunday Emegha v. State (¶¶ 10, 14, 16, 17, 20, 24, 34)6. Amarjit Singh v. State of Delhi Administration

Other High Court

1. Mohammed Shabir Shaikh Bhikan


Sunil Kumar (¶¶15,17) (Chance Recovery) AIR 2014 SC 2564State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand (¶¶15-20) (If merely a bag carried by a person is searched without there being any search of his person, Section 50 of the NDPS Act will have no application.)

AIR 2014 SC 1384

State of Haryana (¶¶ 14, 15) (2013) 6 SCC 595. State (Govt. NCT) of Delhi (¶¶7,10,13,15-16) (2013) 14 SCC 235Ram Avtar @ Rama (¶¶ 12, 22-27) AIR 2011 SC 2699

v. Inspector Customs (¶¶ 8, 10, 11) (2011) 12 SCC 298 Narcotics Central Bureau v. Sukh Dev Raj Sodhi (¶¶ 5-7) (2011) 6 SCC 392Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 20-22) (The SC rejected the theory of “substantial compliance”.)

(2011) 1 SCC 609

. State of Madhya Pradesh (¶¶6,12,16,22) (Where the person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act

(2007) 1 SCC 450

Balwant Rai (¶¶ 5, 6, 8, 9) (2005) 3 SCCDaulat Ram (¶¶ 5-7) (2005) 7 SCC 36

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar (¶¶ 12, 13, 22, 23) (The term “person” under the Act means a human being with appropriate coverings and clothing and also footwear.)

(2004) 7 SCC

Prabha Shankar Dubey v. State of M.P (¶¶7-10,12,15) (The accused (suspect) has to be told in a way that he becomes aware that the choice is his and not of the officer concerned, even though there is no specific

2004(2) SC 56

State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 10, 11, 13) (2001) 6 SCC 692. State of Haryana (¶7) (Search of Person distinguished

from Search of Premises) (2001) 3 SCC 28

Baldev Singh (¶¶ 47, 52-54, 56) (1999) 6 SCC 172Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyed v. State of Gujarat (¶¶6-8,10) (The officer conducting the search must specifically depose that he had informed the person to be searched about his right to demand that the search be carried out in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a

(1995) 3 SCC 610

21) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9364

Anil Kumar, Air Customs Officer, IGI Airport (¶¶ 18, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10940

(¶ 6) 2013 SCC Online Del 1816

v. State (¶ 3) 121 (2005) DLT 84(¶¶ 10, 14, 16, 17, 20, 24, 34) 194 (2012) DLT 3

State of Delhi Administration (¶¶ 27, 29-33) 1994 SCC Online Del 739

Mohammed Shabir Shaikh Bhikan v. The State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 11, 2002 (104(1))

7

AIR 2014 SC 2564 AIR 2014 SC 1384

(2013) 6 SCC 595 (2013) 14 SCC 235 AIR 2011 SC 2699 (2011) 12 SCC 298 (2011) 6 SCC 392 (2011) 1 SCC 609

(2007) 1 SCC 450

(2005) 3 SCC 164 (2005) 7 SCC 36 (2004) 7 SCC 735

2004(2) SC 56

(2001) 6 SCC 692 (2001) 3 SCC 28

(1999) 6 SCC 172 (1995) 3 SCC 610

2019 SCC OnLine Del 9364 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10940 2013 SCC Online Del 1816 121 (2005) DLT 84 194 (2012) DLT 3 1994 SCC Online Del 739 2002 (104(1))

13, 14, 16-18)

d) Sections 52-A, 55 & 57Report of Arrest and Seizure

Supreme Court 1. Union of India v. Jarooparan2. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab

3. Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan 4. Ashok v. State of Madhya Pradesh5. Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana 6. Hardip Singh v. State of Punjab 7. Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union8. Babubhai Odhavji Patel v.9. Khet Singh v. Union of India

10. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 11. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh

e) Section 60- Liability of Illicit Drugs, to Confiscation

Supreme Court 1. Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd.

f) Section 64 & 64A- Immunity from Prosecution

Supreme Court 1. Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi High Court

2. Fardeen Feroz Khan v. Union

g)

Section 67- Power to Examine any Person/ Retraction from Confession

Supreme Court 1. Surinder Kumar Khanna

Intelligence (¶¶ 11, 13-15)2. Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu 3. Kanhaiyalal v. Union of India4. Ram Kumar v. Central Bureau of Narcotics 5. Narcotics Control Bureau Delhi High Court 1. Vishal Puri v. Union of India 2. Narcotics Control Bureau


BOMLR 820

A, 55 & 57- Disposal of Seized Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure

Jarooparan (¶¶ 8-11) (2018) 4 SCC 334

State of Punjab (¶¶ 11, 16, 17) 2018 SCC OnLine SC 973

. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 16, 22, 29, 30, 31) (2015) 6 SCC 222State of Madhya Pradesh (¶¶ 9, 15) (2011) 5 SCC

State of Haryana (¶ 2) (2011) 8 SCC 130. State of Punjab (¶ 13) (2008) 8 SCC 557

Union of India (¶¶ 10, 12, 20-22) (2008) 8 SCC 557v. State of Gujarat (¶ 5) (2005) 8 SCC 725

India (¶¶ 6, 16) (2002) 4 SCC 380State of Kerala (¶¶ 9-13) (2001) 6 SCC 692Baldev Singh (¶¶ 13, 17) (1999) 6 SCC 172

Liability of Illicit Drugs, Substances, Plants, etc.

Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab (¶¶ 2, 3) (1999) 5 SCC 670

Immunity from Prosecution

Vipin Kumar Jaggi (¶¶ 28-33, 36, 38, 39) AIR 2001 SC 2734

Union of India (¶¶ 26, 27, 29) 2007 SCC Online Bom 110

Power to Examine any Person/ Retraction from

v. Intell. Officer, Directorate of Revenue

15) 2018 SCC Online SC 757

State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶ 26, 40, 41) (2013) 16 SCC 31India (¶¶ 35-38, 40) AIR 2008 SC 1044

Central Bureau of Narcotics (¶ 7) (2008) 5 SCC 385Narcotics Control Bureau v. Murlidhar Soni (¶¶ 4, 5) (2004) 5 SCC 151

Union of India (¶¶ 25, 28, 29) 40 (2017) DLT 500 Narcotics Control Bureau v. Ramesh Kumar (¶¶ 21) 2013 SCC Online Del

2194

8

BOMLR 820

(2018) 4 SCC 334 2018 SCC OnLine SC 973 (2015) 6 SCC 222 (2011) 5 SCC 123 (2011) 8 SCC 130 (2008) 8 SCC 557 (2008) 8 SCC 557 (2005) 8 SCC 725 (2002) 4 SCC 380 (2001) 6 SCC 692 (1999) 6 SCC 172

(1999) 5 SCC 670 AIR 2001 SC 2734 2007 SCC Online Bom 110

2018 SCC Online SC 757 (2013) 16 SCC 31 AIR 2008 SC 1044 (2008) 5 SCC 385 (2004) 5 SCC 151 40 (2017) DLT 500 2013 SCC Online Del 2194

Other High Court 1. Gunjan Dudani v. Union of India

h) Section 68A- Application of Forfeiture or Illegally Acquired

Property High Court of Delhi

1. Shri Zahid Parwez v. Union of India

B. Irregularity in Investigation: Impact on Court Proceedings

a) Recording of Secret Information Supreme Court

1. Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana

2. Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana

b) Evidentiary Value of Confessional Statements under NDPS Act

Supreme Court 1. Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu

2. Ram Singh v. Centre Bureau of Narcotics

3. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab

4. Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar

c) Non-compliance of Sections 52, 55 & 57Seized Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure

Supreme Court 1. Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana

d) Illegal Search Supreme Court

1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh person of accused during provided in Section 50 cannot be itself used as admissible evidence of proof of unlawful possession of contraband on accused.)

2. State of H.P. v. Pirthi Chandof search and seizure in violation of mandatory requirement of the Section 50 does not become inadmissible.)

3. Ali Mustafa Abdul Rahman Moosa proof of unlawful possession of the same a person under the NDPS Act.)

e) IO and Complainant, if same person


Union of India (¶¶ 7, 12, 13) (2018) 185 AIC (Sum

28) 14

Application of Forfeiture or Illegally Acquired

Union of India (¶¶ 21) 191 (2012) DLT 235

Irregularity in Investigation: Impact on Court

Recording of Secret Information

Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana (¶¶13-15) (2016) 14 SCC 658

Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana (¶¶12-13,17,22-23,25-27,35-36) (2009) 8 SCC 539

Evidentiary Value of Confessional Statements under

Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶42-45) (2013) 16 SCC 31

Ram Singh v. Centre Bureau of Narcotics (¶¶9-14) (2011) 11 SCC 347

Noor Aga v. State of Punjab (¶¶72, 75-77) (2008) 16 SCC 417

Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar (¶1) (2001) 9 SCC 578

compliance of Sections 52, 55 & 57- Disposal of Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure

Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana (¶9) (2001) 3 SCC 28

. Baldev Singh (¶¶44,47) (Illicit article seized from person of accused during search conducted in violation of safeguards provided in Section 50 cannot be itself used as admissible evidence of proof of unlawful possession of contraband on accused.)

AIR 1999 SC 2378

. Pirthi Chand (¶¶5, 7, 14) (Evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure in violation of mandatory requirement of the Section 50 does not become inadmissible.)

1996 (2) SCC 37

Ali Mustafa Abdul Rahman Moosa v. State of Kerala (¶8) (In absence of proof of unlawful possession of the same a person cannot be held guilty

(1994) 6 SCC 569

IO and Complainant, if same person

9

(2018) 185 AIC (Sum 28) 14

191 (2012) DLT 235

(2016) 14 SCC 658 (2009) 8 SCC 539

(2013) 16 SCC 31

(2011) 11 SCC 347

(2008) 16 SCC 417

(2001) 9 SCC 578

(2001) 3 SCC 28

AIR 1999 SC 2378

1996 (2) SCC 37

(1994) 6 SCC 569

Supreme Court 1. Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab

High Court of Delhi

1. Gurtej Singh Batth v. State

2. Annabelle Analista Malibago

F. SUGGESTED READINGS

S. No. Title 1. A Century of International Drug

Control

2. Critical Analysis of Section 41, 42, 50 of NDPS Act : Procedural Safeguards

3. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Ignoring Health; Infringing Rights

4. History and Development of the Leading International Drug Conventions

5. India’s Anti-Narcotics Law is in Urgent Need of Rehab

6. International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic Solution

7. Parliament Passes the NDPS Bill, 2014: Many Gains; Some Losses

8. Appraisal of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2014

9. Guidelines for the Control of Narcotics


State of Punjab (¶¶ 3, 11, 14-15, 21-22, 24-25) AIR 2018 SC 3853

State (¶¶21-25) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12562

Annabelle Analista Malibago v. DRI (¶¶18-21) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12114

SUGGESTED READINGS

Author SourceA Century of International Drug United Nations

http://www.incb.org/incb/en/ainternationalcontrol.html

Critical Analysis of Section 41, 42, 50 of NDPS Act : Procedural Safeguards

Payal Batham, NLU, Odisha

http://www.nja.nic.in/NJA%20Report%20on%20NDPS%20Act%20(1).pdf

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ignoring Health;

Lawyer’s Collective http://www.lawyerscollective.org/files/Fact%20Sheet%20NDPS%20Act%201985.pdf

History and Development of the Leading International Drug

Parliament Research Branch, Canada

http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history

Narcotics Law is in Urgent Neha Singhal and Sakshi, The Wire

http://thewire.in/19907/indiaslawof

International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic

Matthew S. Jenner http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&context=ijgl

Parliament Passes the NDPS Bill, 2014: Many Gains; Some Losses

Lawyer’s Collective http://www.lawyerscollective.org/updates/parliamentamendmentgains

Appraisal of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment)

Satyakam Mohapatra, Asian Journal of Psychiatry

https://www.asianjournalofpsychiatry.com/article/S18762018(15)000416/fulltext

Guidelines for the Control of Narcotics Professor Bror Rexed, Dr K. http://apps.who.int/iri

10

AIR 2018 SC 3853 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12562 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12114

Source http://www.incb.org/incb/en/a-century-of -international-drug-control.html http://www.nja.nic.in/NJA%20Report%20on%20NDPS%20Act%20(1).pdf http://www.lawyerscollective.org/files/Fact%20Sheet%20NDPS%20Act%201985.pdf http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history-e.htm http://thewire.in/19907/indias-anti-narcotics-law-is-in-urgent-need-of-rehab/ http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&context=ijgls http://www.lawyerscollective.org/updates/parliament-passes-ndps-amendment-bill-2014-gains-losses.html https://www.asianjournalofpsychiatry.com/article/S1876-2018(15)00041-6/fulltext http://apps.who.int/iri

and Psychotropic Substances

10. How Alcoholics Anonymous & Narcotics Anonymous Work

11. Drug Laws in India

12. Narcontrol- A Journal on Control Bureau (2015 Issue)

13. National Policy on Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances

14. Substance Use and Abuse in India Comparative Study with Other Countries

15. The History and Development of the Leading International Drug Control Conventions

16. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act- Ignoring Health, Infringing Rights

17. Drug Policy in India


and Psychotropic Substances Edmondson and others, World Health Organisation

s/bitstream/handle/10665/39299/9241541725_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

How Alcoholics Anonymous & Narcotics Anonymous Work

Amy R. Krentzman, Elizabeth A. R. Robinson and others, US PubMed Centre

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140338/

Centre for Narcotics Training National Academy of Customs, Excise and Narcotics, Faridabad

http://www.antidrugs.gov.il/download/files/indian_drug

A Journal on Narcotics Control Bureau (2015 Issue)

Narcotics Control Bureau http://www.narcoticsindia.nic.in/upload/download/document_idd5cec1027063b70c834c16a86baca424.pdf

National Policy on Narcotic and

Department of Revenue, India https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/National%20Policy%20on%20NDPS%20published.pdf

Substance Use and Abuse in India – A Comparative Study with Other

Dr. Sangita Laha, Intl. Journal of Arts, Humanities, and Management Studies

http://www.ijahms.com/upcomingissue/01.07.2016.pdf

The History and Development of the Leading International Drug Control

Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, Canada

https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ignoring Health,

Lawyer’s Collective http://fileserver.idpc.net/library/Thenarcoticpsychotropic.pdf

Tripti Tandon, Deputy Director, Lawyers Collective

International Drug Policy Consortium, Briefing Paper, Feb 2015

11

s/bitstream/handle/10665/39299/9241541725_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140338/ http://www.antidrugs.gov.il/download/files/indian_drug-laws.pdf http://www.narcoticsindia.nic.in/upload/download/document_idd5cec1027063b70c834c16a86baca424.pdf https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/National%20Policy%20on%20NDPS%20published.pdf http://www.ijahms.com/upcomingissue/01.07.2016.pdf

https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history-e.htm http://fileserver.idpc.net/library/The-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic.pdf International Drug Policy Consortium, Briefing Paper, Feb 2015

3. MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED 2009

A. REPORTS

S. No. Name of the Report

1. 277th Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies, 2018

2. Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, 2018

3. Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019Common Cause, Lok Niti.

4. Chapter-4, “Socio Economic Profile”, Death Penalty I

B. SCHEMES S. No. Name of the Scheme

1. Witness Protection Scheme, 2019

C. INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS S. No. Name of the Scheme

1. International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment

D. CASE LAW

S. NO. Title A. Object of MCOCA, 1999

Supreme Court 1. Prasad Shrikant Purohit

(¶38) 2. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman

(¶¶40,54) 3. State of Maharashtra v.4. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma

Another (¶¶ 24)

B. Protection of Witness Supreme Court

1. Mahender Chawla v. UOI


MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT,

Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies, 2018

Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative,

Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019Common Cause, Lok Niti.

4, “Socio Economic Profile”, Death Penalty India Report, 2016 Pg. 90

Name of the Scheme

Witness Protection Scheme, 2019

INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS Name of the Scheme

International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment

CitationObject of MCOCA, 1999

Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. (2015) 7 SCC

Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 5 SCC 246

v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (¶7) (2008) 13 SCC 5Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294

Protection of Witness

Mahender Chawla v. UOI(¶25) (2018) SCCOnline

12

CRIME ACT,

Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice):

Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative,

Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019-

ndia Report, 2016 Pg. 90-124

International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading

Citation (2015) 7 SCC 440

(2010) 5 SCC 246 (2008) 13 SCC 5 (2005) 5 SCC 294

(2018) SCCOnline

C. Wrongful Prosecution and Compensation in Terror Cases

Supreme Court 1. Adambhai Suleman Bhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujrat 2. Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar

Delhi High Court 1. Prempal v. The Commissioner of Police

D. UAPA and MCOCA

Supreme Court 1. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman

(¶¶ 9,55-65)

E. Essential Commodities Act and MCOCA Supreme Court

1. State of Maharashtra v. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal

F. MCOCA and ITP Act Delhi High Court

1. Kamaljit v. State of NCT of Delhi

G. Constitutional Validity Supreme Court

1. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman (¶¶9, 40-47, 54)

2. State of Maharashtra v. Delhi High Court 1. Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava

Delhi (¶¶ 4, 21-36)

H. Retrospective application of MCOCA Delhi High Court

1. Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava Delhi (¶¶ 4, 21-36)

Other High Courts 1. Jai Singh v. State of Maharashtra

I. Bail under MCOCA

Supreme Court 1. Rambeer Shaukeen v. State of NCT Delhi 2. Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan v. State of Maharashtra

3. Prasad Srikant Purohit


3155

Wrongful Prosecution and Compensation in Terror Cases

Adambhai Suleman Bhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujrat (2014) 7 SCC 716Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar AIR 1983 SC 1086

Prempal v. The Commissioner of Police (¶¶18-22, 30-36) 2010 ILR 4 Del. 416


Essential Commodities Act and MCOCA

State of Maharashtra v. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal (¶¶35-41) (2007) 4 SCC 171

MCOCA and ITP Act

State of NCT of Delhi (¶¶ 41-43, 45,48-58) 148 (2008) DLT 170

Constitutional Validity


v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (¶¶ 21, 33-51) (2008) 13 SCC 5

Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava v. State of NCT of (2009) 164 DLT 218

Retrospective application of MCOCA

Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava v. State of NCT of (2009) 164 DLT 218

State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 6, 7, 8, 9) (2003) 3 MahLJ 866

Rambeer Shaukeen v. State of NCT Delhi (¶¶22-29) (2018) 4 SCC 405Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan v. State of Maharashtra (2016) 10 SCALE

306Prasad Srikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (¶¶ 19, (2015) 7 SCC 440

13

3155 (2014) 7 SCC 716 AIR 1983 SC 1086 2010 ILR 4 Del. 416 (2010) 5 SCC 246 (2007) 4 SCC 171 148 (2008) DLT 170 (2010) 5 SCC 246 (2008) 13 SCC 5 (2009) 164 DLT 218 (2009) 164 DLT 218 (2003) 3 MahLJ 866 (2018) 4 SCC 405 (2016) 10 SCALE 306 (2015) 7 SCC 440

23, 24, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 57, 58, 59)4. State of Maharashtra v.

(¶21) 5. Mustaq Ahmed Mohammad Isak

12, 15, 16) 6. Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav

15) 7. C.B.I. v. Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr.8. Dattatray Krishnaji Ghule

(¶¶ 9,11,13) 9. Gokul Bhagaji Patil v. 10. Babanrao Tukaram Ranjane 11. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma

Another (¶¶36,49-58) 12. Uday Mohan Lal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra 13. Sanjay Dutt v. State (¶¶45

High Court of Delhi 1. Zohra Sheikh v. State (Govt. of NCT of

Other High Court 1. Sadhwi Pragya Singh Thakur

J. “Organised Crime”

Supreme Court 1. Mahipal Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2. State of Maharashtra v.

28, 45, 47, 48) 3. C.B.I . v. Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr.4. Shridhar Sumant Vagal

10) 5. Ranjitsing Brahmajeet Sing

Another (¶¶31)

High Court of Delhi 1. Kamaljeet Singh v. State of Delhi (N.C.T) Other High Courts 1. Jai Singh S/o Ashrafilal Yadav and Ors

7, 8, 9, 18, 19) 2. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe

K. “Continuing Unlawful Activity”

Supreme Court


23, 24, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 57, 58, 59) v. Vishwanath Marana Shetty (2012) 2 SCC 634

Mustaq Ahmed Mohammad Isak v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 10, 11, (2009) 7 SCC 480

Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 9, 14, (2007) 1 SCC 242

Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr. (¶5) 2007 (10) SCALE 69Dattatray Krishnaji Ghule v. State of Maharashtra (2007) 4 SCC 113

State of Maharashtra (¶¶10,11,12,14) (2007) 2 SCC 475Babanrao Tukaram Ranjane v. State of Maharashtra (¶9) (2006) 9 SCC 422Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294

Uday Mohan Lal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶5-13) AIR 2001 SC 1910(¶¶45-54) (1994) 5 SCC 410

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2017 SCC OnLine

Del 7061

Sadhwi Pragya Singh Thakur v. NIA (¶¶16,17, 20, 23) 2012 BomCR (Cri) 752

Central Bureau of Investigation (¶¶ 12-15) (2014) 11 SCC 282v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah and ors. (¶¶ 10, 19, 2008 (12) SCALE

167Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr. (¶5) 2007 (10) SCALE 69

Shridhar Sumant Vagal v. State of Maharashtra and anr. (¶¶ 7, 9, 2007 (4) SCALE 556

Singh Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294

State of Delhi (N.C.T) (¶¶ 20, 38, 49, 53) 148 (2008) DLT 170

Jai Singh S/o Ashrafilal Yadav and Ors v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 2003 BomCr (Crl.) 1606

Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶32-38) 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903

“Continuing Unlawful Activity”

14

(2012) 2 SCC 634

(2009) 7 SCC 480

(2007) 1 SCC 242

2007 (10) SCALE 69 (2007) 4 SCC 113

(2007) 2 SCC 475 (2006) 9 SCC 422 (2005) 5 SCC 294

AIR 2001 SC 1910 (1994) 5 SCC 410 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7061 2012 BomCR (Cri) 752 (2014) 11 SCC 282 2008 (12) SCALE 167 2007 (10) SCALE 69 2007 (4) SCALE 556

(2005) 5 SCC 294

148 (2008) DLT 170 2003 BomCr (Crl.) 1606 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903

1. State v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar 2. State of Maharashtra v.

Other High Courts 1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal

2. State v. Satya Prakash (¶¶ 38, 39, 63, 64)3. State of Maharashtra v.

4. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe

5. Jai Singh v. State of Maharashtra

L. “Member” Other High Courts

1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal

M. “Competent Court”

Supreme Court State v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar

N. Abetment in MCOCA Cases

Supreme Court 1. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma

Another (¶¶30-34) 2. Madan Singh v. State of Bihar Other High Courts 1. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe

17,20)

O. Conspiracy Delhi High Court

1. State v. Sajjan Kumar

P. Private Complaint Under MCOCA

Supreme Court 1. Jamiruddin Ansari v. CBI

Q. Confession under Section 18

Supreme Court 1. State of Maharashtra v.

Ors. (¶¶ 40, 41) 2. Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra


Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar (¶¶ 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34) AIR 2017 SC 236v. Shiva and Ors. (¶¶ 1, 3, 8, 9) AIR 2015 SC 2947

Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶26-32) 2014 CriLJ 4217

(Bom.)(¶¶ 38, 39, 63, 64) (2011) 3 SCC 684

v. Rahul Ramchandra Darud (¶¶ 7, 15) 2011 (SCC) Online Bom 605

Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶32-38) 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903

State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 7-9,18, 19) 2003 (3) MahLJ 866

Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶34-39) 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.)

Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar (¶¶ 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34) AIR 2017 SC 236

Abetment in MCOCA Cases

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294

State of Bihar (¶¶10-15) (2004) 4 SCC 622

Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 6, 7, 8, 9, 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 12930

Private Complaint Under MCOCA

Jamiruddin Ansari v. CBI (¶¶26,35-43) (2009) 6 SCC 316

Confession under Section 18

v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & (2013) 12 SCC 17

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 14 SCC 641

15

AIR 2017 SC 236 AIR 2015 SC 2947 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) (2011) 3 SCC 684 2011 (SCC) Online Bom 605 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 2003 (3) MahLJ 866 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) AIR 2017 SC 236 (2005) 5 SCC 294

(2004) 4 SCC 622 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 12930 (2009) 6 SCC 316 (2013) 12 SCC 17 (2010) 14 SCC 641

3. Devender Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi4. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab

R. Cognizance under Section 23

Other High Courts 1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal

27, 31, 32, 40)

S. Section 24- Failure in Discharge of duty by Public Servant Supreme Court

1. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma Another (¶¶43-53)

T. Section 313, Cr.P.C. and MCOCA

Supreme Court 1. Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra

U. Mandatory Imposing of Fine in MCOCA

Delhi High Court 1. Mohd. Irfan v. State of NCT Of Delhi

V. Police Custody

Supreme Court 1. HDFC Securities Limited and Others

Another(¶16) 2. Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani and Another

3. Rohit Tandon v. ED 4. Kamal Khanna and Another

W. Use of Section 161 Statement

Supreme Court 1. Rameshwar Dayal v. State of UP

2. Tori Singh v. State of UP

X. Presence of IO in Court During Examination of Witness Supreme Court

1. Zahira Sheikh v. State of Gujarat Delhi High Court

2. Asif Balwa v. CBI(¶¶4-7)


. State of NCT of Delhi (2002) 5 SCC 234. State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569

Cognizance under Section 23

Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶19, 20, 21, 26, 2014 CriLJ 4217

(Bom.)

Failure in Discharge of duty by Public Servant

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294

Section 313, Cr.P.C. and MCOCA

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 14 SCC 641

Mandatory Imposing of Fine in MCOCA

Mohd. Irfan v. State of NCT Of Delhi (2018) SCCOnline

Del. 13223

HDFC Securities Limited and Others v. State of Maharashtra and (2017) 1 SCC 640

. P.L. Dani and Another(¶77) 1978

(2018) 11 SCC 46Kamal Khanna and Another v. State and Another 2010 (1)AD (Delhi)

606

Use of Section 161 Statement

. State of UP (1978) 2 SCC 518.

. State of UP AIR 1962

Presence of IO in Court During Examination of Witness

. State of Gujarat AIR 2004 SC 3114

7) 2012 SCC OnLine Del 903

16

(2002) 5 SCC 234 (1994) 3 SCC 569 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) (2005) 5 SCC 294

(2010) 14 SCC 641 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 13223 (2017) 1 SCC 640

1978 (2) SCC 424

(2018) 11 SCC 46 2010 (1)AD (Delhi) 606 (1978) 2 SCC 518. AIR 1962 SC 399 AIR 2004 SC 3114 2012 SCC OnLine Del 903

E. SUGGESTED READINGS

S.No. Title

1. Death in Custody : The Breach of Trust and Its Price

4. SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989

A. RULES S. No.

Title

1. SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Rules, 1995

B. CASE LAWS S. No. Title

A. Emerging Issues Supreme Court

1. Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors17)

2. Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.24,39-40)

3. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.4. Lata Singh v. State of U .P. and Anr.5. Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi)

B. Constitutional Validity

Supreme Court 1. State of M.P. and Another

3, 6, 8, 9, 11) Other High Courts

1. Jai Singh and Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

C. Offences of Atrocities (Section 3)

Mere Knowledge of Caste of Victim is Enough Supreme Court

1. Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh2. Gorige Pentaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh


SUGGESTED READINGS

Citation Death in Custody : The Breach of Trust and Its Price Zia Mody, 10

Judgments That Changed India (Penguin Books)

SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989

SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Rules, 1995

Citation

Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors(¶¶15-

Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (¶¶19-21, (2018)9SC C 501

. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.(¶53) Lata Singh v. State of U .P. and Anr. (¶¶14-18) ( 2006 ) 5 SCC 475Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi) (¶8) ( 2011 ) 6 SCC 396

Constitutional Validity

State of M.P. and Another v. Ram Kishna Balothia and Another (¶¶

. Union of India & Ors. (¶¶ 50, 51, 66, 81) AIR 1993 Raj 177

(Rajasthan HC)

Offences of Atrocities (Section 3) Mere Knowledge of Caste of Victim is Enough

Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶ 5-6) (2018) 1 SCC 742Gorige Pentaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh 2008 Cr.L.J. 350 SC

17

Citation Zia Mody, 10 Judgments That Changed India (Penguin Books)

SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989

Citation (2018)10SCC713

(2018)9SC C 501

(2018)7SCC192 ( 2006 ) 5 SCC 475 ( 2011 ) 6 SCC 396 (1995)3SCC221

AIR 1993 Raj 177 (Rajasthan HC) (2018) 1 SCC 742 2008 Cr.L.J. 350 SC

Delhi High Court 1. Rameez v. The State NCT of Delhi

Other High Court 1. Taranath V State of AP

D. Use of Objectionable Terms and Section 3

Supreme Court 1. Arumugam Servai v. State of Tamil Nadu2. Swaran Singh and Ors. v. State

3. Masumaha Hasanasha Musalman v State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court

1. Pappu Singh v. State of UP

E. “Public View” under Section 3 Delhi High Court

1. Daya Bhatnagar and Ors2. Kanhaiya Paswan v. State & Ors.

3. Karam Veer Singh & Ors

4. Mukesh Kumar Saini & Ors. Other High Court

1. Mahesh Saksham Patole v The State of Maharashtra

F. Common Intention under Section 3

1. Ratikant Ray v State of Odisha

G. Non Presentation of Caste Certificate: Cannot be Ground for

Acquittal Supreme Court

1. Kailas and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

H. Delay in FIR

Supreme Court 1. Vidyadharan v. State of Kerala

I. Section 3: Various Facets


. The State NCT of Delhi (¶¶21-22)

469

State of AP 1999 (1) Crimes 188(A.P.)

Use of Objectionable Terms and Section 3

State of Tamil Nadu(¶¶10,14) (2011)6SC C 405Swaran Singh and Ors. v. State (¶¶24,25) MANU/SC/7954/20

08Masumaha Hasanasha Musalman v State of Maharashtra(¶9) AIR 2000 SC 1876

Pappu Singh v. State of UP 2002CriLJ1251

“Public View” under Section 3

Daya Bhatnagar and Ors. v. State (¶¶ 10, 15, 21, 23, 25) 109 (2004) DLT 915

State & Ors. (¶¶ 5, 6) (2012) ILR 4 Delhi 509

Karam Veer Singh & Ors. v. State (¶¶ 5-10) 12

Mukesh Kumar Saini & Ors. v. State ( Delhi Adm.) (¶¶ 7, 8) 94 (2001) DLT 241

Mahesh Saksham Patole v The State of Maharashtra(¶5) 2010 (1) RCR 39 (Bom.)

ention under Section 3 State of Odisha 2015(1)ILR917

Non Presentation of Caste Certificate: Cannot be Ground for

State of Maharashtra(¶¶15-16) (2011)1SC C

(Cri)401

State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 12, 16, 23, 24) (2004) 1 SCC 215

Section 3: Various Facets

18

2018 I VAD(Delhi) 469 1999 (1) Crimes 188(A.P.) (2011)6SC C 405 MANU/SC/7954/2008 AIR 2000 SC 1876 2002CriLJ1251 109 (2004) DLT 915 (2012) ILR 4 Delhi 509 MANU/DE/1972/2012 94 (2001) DLT 241 2010 (1) RCR 39 (Bom.) 2015(1)ILR917

(2011)1SC C (Cri)401 (2004) 1 SCC 215

Delhi High Court 1. Kulwinder and Ors. v.

(¶¶50, 53,57,65, 66-70, 74,76, 79225, 267, 302, 305, 336, 349,350)

2. Sh. M.A. Rashid v. Sh. Gopal Chandra & Anr. 3. Shri Ghasi Ram v. NCT of Delhi and Anr.

4. Shri. D.P. Vats v. State and Ors. Other High Courts

1. State of Bihar v. Ajay Singh, Manoj Singh and Narendra Singh @ Nagendra Singh Sanjay Singh v. State of Bihar

2. Balkeshwar Maurya v. State of U.P.

3. Nabab v. State of U.P.

J. Investigation

a) Preliminary Inquiry Supreme Court

1. Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan

b) Power of National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Investigation SC/ST (POA) Act

Supreme Court 1. Ishwar Pratap Singh v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Other High Courts 1. Tutu v. State(¶5) (Orissa High Court)2. Shatrughna v. State (¶15) (Bombay High Court)

c) Investigation Only by Person of Rank of DSP

Other High Court 1. Manoj kumar Giri v State of Jharkhand

K. Cognizance

Supreme Court

1. Sri A.M.C.S. Swamy, ADE/DPE/Hyd (Central) v. Mehdi Agah Karbalai & Anr.

2. Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh


Kulwinder and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

70, 74,76, 79-80, 83, 102, 109-110, 133-134, 225, 267, 302, 305, 336, 349,350)

252(2018)DLT1

. Sh. Gopal Chandra & Anr. (¶¶ 13, 18, 24, 25) 189 (2012) DLT 180NCT of Delhi and Anr. (¶¶ 12-14) (2008) ILR 1 Delhi

426State and Ors. (¶¶ 10-13) 99 (2003) DLT 167

. Ajay Singh, Manoj Singh and Narendra Singh @

Sanjay Singh v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court)

2012 (2) PLJR 601

Balkeshwar Maurya v. State of U.P. (¶¶4-5) 2002 CriLJ 4565(Allahabad HC)

Nabab v. State of U.P. 2002 (Allahabad HC)

Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra CND.O.D2018

Power of National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Investigation SC/ST (POA) Act

Ishwar Pratap Singh v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶8-9) (2018)13SCC612

(¶5) (Orissa High Court) 2003CriLJ 722

(¶15) (Bombay High Court) 2003CriLJ

Investigation Only by Person of Rank of DSP

Manoj kumar Giri v State of Jharkhand(¶9) 2004 CrLJ 3434

Sri A.M.C.S. Swamy, ADE/DPE/Hyd (Central) v. Mehdi Agah Cr Appeal /2019 [S.L.P.(Cr) No.2073/ 2019]Dated 23/7/2019

Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶ 5-6) (2018) 1 SCC 742

19

252(2018)DLT1

189 (2012) DLT 180 (2008) ILR 1 Delhi 426 99 (2003) DLT 167 2012 (2) PLJR 601

2002 CriLJ 4565 (Allahabad HC) 2002 CriLJ 4580 (Allahabad HC) CRIMINAL APPEAL

NO. 416 OF 2018 D.O.D-20 MARCH

2018

(2018)13SCC612 2003CriLJ 722 2003CriLJ 790 2004 CrLJ 3434

Cr Appeal No.1102 /2019 [S.L.P.(Cr) No.2073/ 2019] Dated 23/7/2019 (2018) 1 SCC 742

3. Gangula Ashok and Ors.

4. Vidyadharan v. State of Kerala

Other High Courts

1. In Re: Provision of Section 14a of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015(¶¶103

2. Ujjagar Singh and Ors.

3. Ranjit Singh Motta v. Harmel Kaur

L. Sentencing

Supreme Court 1. State of Madhya Pradesh

Other High Courts 2. Moti Chand and Anr. v

M. Bail (Section 18)

Supreme Court 1. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan

(¶¶ 42, 53, 59, 67,68, 75, 81)2. Vilas Pandurang Pawar and Ors.

(¶¶8-9)

N. Anticipatory Bail Supreme Court

1. Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan

2. Vikas Pandurang Pawar v. State of Maharashtra 3. State of M.P. and Ors.

Delhi High Court 1. Rameez v. The State NCT of Delhi

2. Dr. R.K. Sangwan &Anr.

3. Sajjan Kumar v. The State &


Gangula Ashok and Ors. v. State of A.P. (¶16) AIR 2000 SC 740

State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 12, 16, 23, 24) (2004) 1 SCC

In Re: Provision of Section 14a of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) (¶¶103-109)

2018CriLJ5010(Allahabad HC)

Ujjagar Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr. (¶¶7) 2003 CriLJ2204(Punjab & Haryana HC)

. Harmel Kaur (¶¶6-7) 2002CriLJ449(Punjab & Haryana HC)

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vikram Das (¶¶8) (2019)4SCC125

v. State of Rajasthan(¶¶48) 2001CriLJ1916(Rajasthan HC)

Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 42, 53, 59, 67,68, 75, 81)

2018

Vilas Pandurang Pawar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra CND.O.D2018

Vikas Pandurang Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 8,9) (2012)State of M.P. and Ors. v. Ram Kishna Balothia and Ors. (¶¶5)

. The State NCT of Delhi (¶¶21-22)

69Dr. R.K. Sangwan &Anr. v. State (Delhi) (¶¶ 11, 13) Cr Ref. 01/2008

Dated 18/3/2009The State & Anr. (¶¶ 15-17) 132 (2006) DLT 18

20

AIR 2000 SC 740

(2004) 1 SCC 215

2018CriLJ5010 (Allahabad HC) 2003 CriLJ2204 (Punjab & Haryana HC) 2002CriLJ449 (Punjab & Haryana HC) (2019)4SCC125 2001CriLJ1916 (Rajasthan HC) 2018 (4) SCALE 661

CRIMINAL APPEAL

NO. 416 OF 2018 D.O.D-20 MARCH

2018 (2012) 8 SCC 795 (1995)3SCC221 2018IVAD(Delhi)469 Cr Ref. 01/2008 Dated 18/3/2009 132 (2006) DLT 18

C. SUGGESTED READINGS S.No. Title

1. Judicial Pronouncement and Caste

2. Rising Pendency, Falling Convictions: What Data on SC/ST Act Trials Show

D. MOVIE RECOMMENDATIONS

S.No. Details 1. Ardh Satya, Govind Nihlani, Manmohan Shetty, 1983

The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights manychallenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,custodial torture and in general working of highlighted in the movie.

2. Article 15, Anubhav Sinha, Zee Studios, 2019 The movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The movie maybe relevant for understanding the caste hurdles in access to justice for victims of atrocities.

3. Shahid, Hansal Mehta, Anurag Kashyap, 2013 Based on the life of human rights lawyer Shahid Azmi defending various accused in tCourt in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution and religion based prejudices.

4. Bandit Queen, Shekhar Kapoor, Bobby Bedi, 1994 The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account of deep seated struggles of caste and gender violence in India.


SUGGESTED READINGS Citation

Judicial Pronouncement and Caste Rakesh Shukla, Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 41, Issue No. 42, 21 Oct, 2006; Pp.4403

Rising Pendency, Falling What Data on SC/ST

Shalini Nair, http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/risingpendency-falling-convictions-whatact-trials-show-prevention-of-atrocities5113689/

MOVIE RECOMMENDATIONS

, Govind Nihlani, Manmohan Shetty, 1983

The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights manychallenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,custodial torture and in general working of police machinery of the country have beenhighlighted in the movie.

, Anubhav Sinha, Zee Studios, 2019

he movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The movie maybe relevant for understanding the caste and gender prejudices which work as hurdles in access to justice for victims of atrocities.

, Hansal Mehta, Anurag Kashyap, 2013

Based on the life of human rights lawyer Shahid Azmi who was assassinated in 2010 for defending various accused in terror cases. The movie is in spirit of judgment of Supreme Court in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution and religion based prejudices.

, Shekhar Kapoor, Bobby Bedi, 1994

The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account of deep seated struggles of caste and gender violence in India.

21

Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 41, Issue No. 42, 21 Oct, 2006; Pp.4403-4406

http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rising-what-data-on-sc-st-atrocities-act-

The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights many challenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,

police machinery of the country have been

he movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The and gender prejudices which work as

assassinated in 2010 for error cases. The movie is in spirit of judgment of Supreme

Court in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution

The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account

5. BANKING FRAUDS AND CHEATING

A. CASE LAWS

A. Quashing the Criminal Proceedings

Banking and Corporate Frauds Supreme Court

1. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh2. State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi 3. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit4. Nikhil Merchant v CBI (¶¶18,24)

B. Specimen writing- During Police Investigation

Indian Evidence Act, 1872) Supreme Court

1. State(Delhi Administartion)

C. Voice Samples, Bodily Fluids Supreme Court

1. Ritesh Sinha v. State of U.P.

2. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad

D. Handwriting Expert Supreme Court

1. Sonvir vs. The State of NCT of Delhi High Court of Delhi

1. Sapan Haldar v State

6. SAFEGUARD AND PRECAUTION

INVESTIGATION

A. REPORTS S.No. Reports

1. 198th Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness Protection Programme, 2006

2. Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with Witnesses, Centre for Civil and Criminal Justice Administration,2009

B. CASE LAWS

S.No. Title


BANKING FRAUDS AND CHEATING

Quashing the Criminal Proceedings-a Misplaced Sympathy?

Banking and Corporate Frauds

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh (¶¶10,12) (2016) 1 SCC 389State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi (¶23) 2014 (10) SCALE 690Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh (¶¶14-15) 2013 (10) SCC 686

(¶¶18,24) (2008 ) 9 SCC 677

During Police Investigation (Section 73 Indian Evidence Act, 1872)

State(Delhi Administartion) v. Pali Ram (¶¶25-26,28-30) (1979) 2 SCC 158

s, Bodily Fluids During Investigation

. State of U.P. 2019 SCC OnLine SC 956

Kathi Kalu Oghad A.I.R. 1961 SC 1808

Sonvir vs. The State of NCT of Delhi (¶¶27,39,51,52,54,60) AIR

(¶30) 191

SAFEGUARD AND PRECAUTIONS DURING THE

Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness Protection Programme, 2006 Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with Witnesses, Centre for Civil and Criminal Justice Administration, NLIU

Citation

22

(2016) 1 SCC 389 2014 (10) SCALE 690 2013 (10) SCC 686 (2008 ) 9 SCC 677

(1979) 2 SCC 158

2019 SCC OnLine SC 956 A.I.R. 1961 SC 1808

AIR 2018 SC 3131

191 (2012) DLT 225

Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness

Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with NLIU- Bhopal- BPRD,

Citation

A. Informant and IO Cannot be The Same Supreme Court

1. Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab

B. Right to Fair Investigation Supreme Court

1. Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab 2. Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State of NCT Delhi

C. Court Cannot Interfere with Investigative Process

Supreme Court 1. UOI v. Prakash P. Hinduja

D. Further Investigation

Supreme Court 1. Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (2. Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali

E. Defective Investigation

1. State of Gujrat v. Kishanbhai 2. Dinesh Borathakur v. State of Assam

F. Witnesses

1. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat2. PUCL v. Union of India

G. Protection of Witness

Supreme Court 1. Mahender Chawla v. UOI

H. Case Diary

Supreme Court 1. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement

2. Mukund Lal v. UOI (¶¶2

I. Content of Case Diary Supreme Court

1. Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police

J. Accused Does Not Have Unfettered Right to Case Diary Supreme Court

1. Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand


Informant and IO Cannot be The Same

Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab (¶¶13-14) AIR 2018 SC 3853

Right to Fair Investigation

Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab (¶¶26-27) (2009) 1 SCC 441Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State of NCT Delhi (2010) 6 SCC 1

Court Cannot Interfere with Investigative Process

UOI v. Prakash P. Hinduja (2003) 6 SCC 195

Further Investigation

Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (¶4) (1985)

Irshad Ali (2013) 5 SCC 762

Defective Investigation State of Gujrat v. Kishanbhai (2014) 5 SCC 108 Dinesh Borathakur v. State of Assam (2008) 5 SCC 697

Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat 2004 Cri LJ 205PUCL v. Union of India 2003(10) SCALE

Protection of Witness

Mahender Chawla v. UOI (¶25) (2018) SCCOnline

3155

Directorate of Enforcement (¶¶45-53) CA No. 1340 of 2019 Dated:05.09.2019

(¶¶2-4) AIR 1989 SC 144

Content of Case Diary

Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police(¶17) AIR 1983 SC 826

Accused Does Not Have Unfettered Right to Case Diary

Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand (¶¶8-19) AIR 2017 SC 2375

23

AIR 2018 SC 3853

(2009) 1 SCC 441 (2010) 6 SCC 1

(2003) 6 SCC 195

(1985) 2 SCC 537 (2013) 5 SCC 762

(2014) 5 SCC 108 (2008) 5 SCC 697

2004 Cri LJ 205 2003(10) SCALE 967

(2018) SCCOnline 3155

CA No. 1340 of 2019 Dated:05.09.2019 AIR 1989 SC 144

AIR 1983 SC 826

AIR 2017 SC 2375

K. Recording of Confessions and Statements

Supreme Court 1. Sonvir @ Somvir v. The State of NCT of Delhi 2. Somasundaram v. State 3. Nagaraj v. State (¶¶ 14, 16)4. R. Shaji v. State of Kerala 5. Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab

Maharashtra (¶¶ 426, 452, 454, 467, 485)6. Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan 7. Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh

(¶¶ 19, 22-29) 8. S. Arul Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu 9. Utpal Das v. State of West Bengal 10. State of Punjab v. Harjagdev Singh 11. Ram Singh v. Sonia and Others 12. Aloke Nath Dutta v. State of West Bengal

(¶¶ 31-33, 44-46, 48, 50, 5213. Babubhai Udesinh Parmar 14. Bishnu Prasad Sinha and Another

(¶¶ 18-23, 25, 26, 36, 37)15. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh 16. State of Tamil Nadu v.17. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde 18. Jogendra Nahak and Others v. State of Orissa and Others

(¶¶ 7, 10, 13, 15, 21-25)19. Shivappa v. State of Karnataka 20. Shankaria v. State of Rajasthan 21. State of UP v. Singhara Singh and Others

20) 22. Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab

High Court of Delhi1. State v. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and Kuljeet Singh @ Ranga

173)

L. Disposal of Unclaimed Case Property Supreme Court

1. Indian Timber and Plywood Corporation Limited and Others State of Kerala and Others

2. State of Bombay v. Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam High Court of Delhi

1. Manjit Siugh v. State Other High Courts

1. Abhay Shrenikbhai Gandhi


Recording of Confessions and Statements

The State of NCT of Delhi (¶ 6) 2018 Indlaw SC 431

. State (¶ 61) (2016) 16 SCC 355(¶¶ 14, 16) (2015) 4 SCC 739

R. Shaji v. State of Kerala (¶¶ 13-16) (2013) 14 SCC 266Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab v. State of

(¶¶ 426, 452, 454, 467, 485) AIR 2012 SC 3565

Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 5-7) (2012) 12 SCC 406Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh v. Republic of India (2011) 2 SCC 490

. State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶ 43-45, 47-54) (2010) 8 SCC 233. State of West Bengal (¶ 13) AIR 2010 SC 1894

. Harjagdev Singh (¶¶ 7, 9, 11) (2009) 8 SCALE 568Ram Singh v. Sonia and Others (¶¶ 16, 17, 21, 23-25, 28, 48) AIR 2007 SC 1218Aloke Nath Dutta v. State of West Bengal

46, 48, 50, 52-55, 64, 65, 70, 72) (2007) 12 SCC 2

Babubhai Udesinh Parmar v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 8-11) AIR 2007 SC 420Bishnu Prasad Sinha and Another v. State of Assam

23, 25, 26, 36, 37) AIR 2007 SC 848

Bhagwan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (¶ 28) (2003) 3 SCC 21v. Kutty @ Lakshmi Narsimhan (¶ 13) (2001) 6 SCC 550

State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (¶¶ 25, 26) (2000) 6 SCC 269Jogendra Nahak and Others v. State of Orissa and Others

25) AIR 1999 SC 2565

Shivappa v. State of Karnataka (¶¶ 6, 7) (1995) 2 SCC 76Shankaria v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 36, 40, 43) (1978) 4 SCC 453

Singhara Singh and Others (¶¶ 7-9, 11-13, 16- AIR 1964 SC 358

Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab (¶ 10) AIR 1957 SC 637High Court of Delhi

Jasbir Singh @ Billa and Kuljeet Singh @ Ranga (¶ 17 (1980) DLT 404

Disposal of Unclaimed Case Property

Indian Timber and Plywood Corporation Limited and Others v. State of Kerala and Others (¶ 7)

1994 (2) SCALE 385

. Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam (¶ 8) AIR 1967 SC 1885High Court of Delhi

(¶¶ 3, 8-10, 19, 28, 35, 57, 83, 84) 214 (2014) DLT 646

Abhay Shrenikbhai Gandhi v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 40, 62, 63, (2016) 3 GLR 2602

24

2018 Indlaw SC 431 (2016) 16 SCC 355 (2015) 4 SCC 739 (2013) 14 SCC 266 AIR 2012 SC 3565

(2012) 12 SCC 406 (2011) 2 SCC 490

(2010) 8 SCC 233 AIR 2010 SC 1894 (2009) 8 SCALE 568 AIR 2007 SC 1218 (2007) 12 SCC 230

AIR 2007 SC 420 AIR 2007 SC 848

(2003) 3 SCC 21 (2001) 6 SCC 550 (2000) 6 SCC 269 AIR 1999 SC 2565

(1995) 2 SCC 76 (1978) 4 SCC 453 AIR 1964 SC 358

AIR 1957 SC 637

17 (1980) DLT 404

1994 (2) SCALE 385

AIR 1967 SC 1885

214 (2014) DLT 646

(2016) 3 GLR 2602

66, 67) 2. Yousoof Marakair v. State of Mysore and Another

M. Release of Articles on Superdari

Supreme Court 1. Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujrat

21) 2. B. Saha v. M.S. Kochar

High Court of Delhi

1. Manjit Singh v. State 2. Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh

Other High Courts 1. Naottam Singh Dhillon and Another

16, 18)

N. Material/Documents filed by Police along with the Charge sheet

Supreme Court 1. Amanullah and Others 2. V.K. Sasikala v. State Represented by Superintendent of Police

(¶¶ 11-16) 3. Sidhartha Vashisht @Manu Sharma

(¶¶ 79, 84, 91) 4. Satya Narain Musadi and Others

High Court of Delhi

1. Yoginder Singh Verma

Other High Courts 1. Paras Jain and Others

O. Material/Documents collected by Police, but not filed along

with the Charge sheet Supreme Court

1. Manjeet Singh Khera 2. Fakhruddin Ahmad v.

10, 18) High Court of Delhi

1. Shri D.K. Gupta v. Punjab National Bank

2. Suresh Kumar Pathrella


Yousoof Marakair v. State of Mysore and Another (¶ 11) AIR 1969 Kant 203

Release of Articles on Superdari

Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujrat (¶¶7-9, 11-15, 17- AIR 2003 SC 638

M.S. Kochar (¶¶ 3-5) (1979) 4 SCC 177High Court of Delhi

(¶¶ 3, 22) 214 (2014) DLT 646Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh (¶¶8-11) ILR(2009)Supp.(1)Del

hi471

Naottam Singh Dhillon and Another v. State of Haryana (¶¶ 15, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 669

Material/Documents filed by Police along with the Charge

Amanullah and Others v. State of Bihar and Others (¶¶ 27, 28) (2016) 6 SCC 699

State Represented by Superintendent of Police AIR 2013 SC 613

Sidhartha Vashisht @Manu Sharma v. State (NCT Of Delhi) AIR 2010 S

Satya Narain Musadi and Others v. State of Bihar (¶¶ 9-12) (1980) 3 SCC 152

High Court of Delhi Yoginder Singh Verma v. CBI (¶ 8) 2016 (2) JCC 1214

Paras Jain and Others v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 18-23) 2016 (2)(Raj)

Material/Documents collected by Police, but not filed along with the Charge sheet

Manjeet Singh Khera v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 7, 8, 11) (2013) 9 SCC 276

v. State of Uttaranchal and Another (¶¶ 8- (2008) 17 SCC 157

High Court of Delhi . Punjab National Bank (¶¶ 7, 10) 2013 SCC Online Del

3020Suresh Kumar Pathrella v. State through CBI (¶¶ 7, 9, 10, 13) 2010 SCC Online Del

3120

25

AIR 1969 Kant 203

AIR 2003 SC 638

(1979) 4 SCC 177

214 (2014) DLT 646 ILR(2009)Supp.(1)Delhi471

2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 669

(2016) 6 SCC 699 AIR 2013 SC 613

AIR 2010 SC 2352

(1980) 3 SCC 152

2016 (2) JCC 1214

2016 (2) RLW 945 (Raj)

(2013) 9 SCC 276 (2008) 17 SCC 157

2013 SCC Online Del 3020 2010 SCC Online Del 3120

Other High Courts 3. Akhilesh Kumar v. State of Maharashtra

P. Stock Witness Supreme Court

1. Prem Chanda(Paniwala)

C. SUGGESTED READINGS

S.No. Title 1. What Witnesses Really Need

7. ELECTRONIC RECORD/EVIDENCE

A. CASE LAWS

A. Necessity Of Certificate Under Section 65B Of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Supreme Court 1. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

(¶Matter Referred to Larger Bench)

2. Shafhi Mohammad v State of Himachal Pradesh

3. Sonu v. Stae of Haryana 4. Anvar P. V. v P. K. Basheer

High Court of Delhi

1. Rakesh Kumar v State (¶¶196

Other High Court

1. Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B.

B. Stage of Submitting the Certificate


State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 16-18) 2017 SCC Online

Bom 3867

Prem Chanda(Paniwala) v. UOI (¶¶4-10) (1981) 1 SCC 639

SUGGESTED READINGS

Citation What Witnesses Really Need G.S. Bajpai, 12 February 2019, The Indian

Express https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/india-witness-protection-scheme5578921/

ELECTRONIC RECORD/EVIDENCE

Necessity Of Certificate Under Section 65B Of The Indian

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (¶Matter Referred to Larger Bench)

Civil Appeal No(s). 20825-20826 OF 2017 Order Dated 26.07.2019

Shafhi Mohammad v State of Himachal Pradesh (¶¶ 11-12) SLP(Crl.)No.2302 of 2017 Order Dated: 30.01.2

Sonu v. Stae of Haryana (¶¶27,32) AIR 2017 SC 3441

Anvar P. V. v P. K. Basheer (¶¶ 19,31,34,37,41) AIR 2015 SC 180

(¶¶196-207) 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2609

Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B. (¶¶64-70) 2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal HC)

Stage of Submitting the Certificate

26

2017 SCC Online Bom 3867

(1981) 1 SCC 639

G.S. Bajpai, 12 February 2019, The Indian

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columnsscheme-supreme-court-

Civil Appeal No(s). 20825-20826 OF 2017 Order Dated 26.07.2019 SLP(Crl.)No.2302 of 2017 Order Dated: 30.01.2018 AIR 2017 SC 3441 AIR 2015 SC 180

2009 SCC OnLine Del

2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal

Supreme Court 1. State of Karnataka v. M. R. Hiremath

High Court of Delhi 1. Kundan Singh v State (¶¶48

Other High Courts

1. Avadut Waman Kushe v. State of Maharashtra

2. K. Ramajayam v. Inspector of Police

3. Paras Jain and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

C. Admissibility of Call Records1. Tomas Bruno v State of UP2. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu and Ors

D. Admissibility of CD/DVDs

High Court of Delhi 1. Ankur Chawla v. Central Bureau of Investigation

2. M/s. P. R. Transport Agency v. Union of India

Other High Court 1. Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and Ors.

2. Paras Jain v. State of Rajasthan 3. State of Gujarat v. Shailendra Kamalkishor Pande and Ors.

(¶¶3,6,7)

E. Admissibility of e-Mails Other High Court

1. Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B

F. Admissibility of Interview Transcripts Supreme Court

1. Jagjit singh v. State of Haryana High Court of Delhi

1. Sharad Yadav and Ors. v


. M. R. Hiremath(¶¶13-17) AIR 2019 SC 2377

(¶¶48-51,62) 2015 SCC OnLine Del

13647

Avadut Waman Kushe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶1,10) 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 3236

K. Ramajayam v. Inspector of Police (¶¶33,35) 2016 SCC OnLine Mad 451

. State of Rajasthan (¶¶18-23) 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 8331

Admissibility of Call Records Tomas Bruno v State of UP(¶¶24,40) (2015) 7 SCC 178State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu and Ors(¶¶15-16) AIR 2005 SC 3820

Admissibility of CD/DVDs

Ankur Chawla v. Central Bureau of Investigation (¶¶18-19) 2014

6461 M/s. P. R. Transport Agency v. Union of India (¶8) AIR 2006 All 23

. State of Haryana and Ors. (¶¶8-11,13,15) 2015(2) RCR(Criminal)

289 P&HParas Jain v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶18-23) (2016) 2 RLW 945 (Raj)

. Shailendra Kamalkishor Pande and Ors. 2008 CriLJ 953 Guj

Mails

Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B (¶¶66,71) 2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal

HC) Admissibility of Interview Transcripts

. State of Haryana (¶¶39-41) (2006) 11 SCC 1

v. Union of India (UOI) (¶¶15-17) 82 (1999) DLT 13

27

AIR 2019 SC 2377

2015 SCC OnLine Del 13647

2016 SCC OnLine Bom

2016 SCC OnLine Mad

2015 SCC OnLine Raj

(2015) 7 SCC 178 AIR 2005 SC 3820

SCC OnLine Del

AIR 2006 All 23

2015(2) RCR(Criminal) 289 P&H (2016) 2 RLW 945 (Raj) 2008 CriLJ 953 Guj

2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal

(2006) 11 SCC 1

82 (1999) DLT 13

Other High Court 1. Sajidbeg Asifbeg Mirza v

G. Admissibility of Tape Recorded Conversations

Supreme Court

1. Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari and Ors (¶¶19)

2. R.M. Malkani v State of Maharashtra 3. N. Sri Rama Reddy and Ors. 4. Yusufalli Esmail Nagree

H. Electronic Evidence in Matrimonial Proceedings

High Court of Delhi 1. Archana v. Himanshu Bahl

2. A v. T

Other High Court

1. Pramod E. K. v. Louna V.C.

2. Karuppasamy v. State of T.N

3. Preeti Jain v. Kunal Jain

4. Vishal Kaushik v. Family Court &Anr.

5. Mrs. Havovi Kersi Sethna v. Mr. Kersi Gustad Sethna 25-28)

B. SUGGESTED READINGSA. Admissibility of electronic evidence1. Electronic Evidence- The Great Indian

Quagmire 2. Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

3. Rethinking Admissibility of Electronic Evidence


v State Of Gujarat (¶¶5-7,9) 2007 GLH (1) 400

(Gujarat)

Admissibility of Tape Recorded Conversations

Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra AIR 1975 SC 1788

R.M. Malkani v State of Maharashtra (¶¶23,27,29) AIR 1973 SC 157N. Sri Rama Reddy and Ors. v. V.V. Giri (¶¶23,27) AIR 1971 SC 1162Yusufalli Esmail Nagree v. The State of Maharashtra (¶6) AIR 1968 SC 147

Electronic Evidence in Matrimonial Proceedings

Archana v. Himanshu Bahl(¶¶22) I (2017) DMC 638 (DB)

(Del.)Del HC CM(M) 207/2018 Date of Decision: 28.05.2018

v. Louna V.C.(¶¶ 10, 11) 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 165

Karuppasamy v. State of T.N. (¶¶6,7) III (2017) DMC 525 (Mad.)

Kunal Jain (¶¶ 8, 9) 2016 SCC OnLine Raj 2838

Vishal Kaushik v. Family Court &Anr.(¶¶ 25) 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 7851

Mrs. Havovi Kersi Sethna v. Mr. Kersi Gustad Sethna (¶¶ 21, 2011 (3) Bom Cr 100

SUGGESTED READINGS Admissibility of electronic evidence

The Great Indian N. S. Nappinai

Electronic Evidence Justice Kurian Joseph

Rethinking Admissibility of Electronic Aradhya Sethia

28

2007 GLH (1) 400 (Gujarat)

AIR 1975 SC 1788

AIR 1973 SC 157 AIR 1971 SC 1162 AIR 1968 SC 147

I (2017) DMC 638 (DB) (Del.) Del HC CM(M) 207/2018 Date of Decision: 28.05.2018

2019 SCC OnLine Ker

III (2017) DMC 525 (Mad.) 2016 SCC OnLine Raj

2015 SCC OnLine Raj

2011 (3) Bom Cr 100

(2019) 3 SCC J-41 (2009) 3 SCC J-32 24 IJLIT 229-250 (2016)

Disclaimer- The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of

respective authors and producers. The views therein do not represent views of Delhi Judicial Academy.


The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of producers. The views therein do not represent views of

29

The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of producers. The views therein do not represent views of