Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Self-Reflection of the Intactivist Movement for Possible Self-Correction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/self-reflection-of-the-intactivist-movement-for-possible-self-correction 1/3
Commo
Call f
Self-Reflection of
The question is not if the Intacti
are involved in this Movement.
We know of about 35,000 peoplmajority of intactivists is in the
States and in the Middle and Far
“Operation Abraham” and “inte
the “dynamic of discussions ove
“research over research”; “petiti
the base of the misconception /
religion and tradition to mutilat
were not outlawed by current la
of a law to ban MGM” (these M
“petitioning” the government fo
The question about the Intactiv
What is the fundamental, princi
The answer is: SEE THE TEXT AB
How effective is this intactivist
The answer is:
A) Forced Circumcision of childr
B) All 18 MGM-Bill-“petitions” fo
C) 99% of the Movement is still
Vi
“The true value of
“NULLA
“The
Exposé
“
n Sense Protects Every Chil
r the rise of common sense
Jerusalem, April 12th
2012
the Intactivist Movement for possible Self-Corr
ist Movement is an International Movement an
e globally who speak against male-child genitalSA / Canada / UK / Australia area; a few are in o
East area. Some of these intactivists are also vo
sex – mutilations” and the predominant dynami
discussions”; the “exchange of information am
ons for legislation”; “street-protests and other g
the fallacy of MGM were a “legal right of choice
the child” / based on the misconception / the f
” / based on the misconception / the fallacy as
M-Bill Initiatives) / based on the misconception
r “legislation” of “restrictions” on this OBVIOUS
ist Movement is:
al and of course mutual position of the intactivi
VE.
ovement?
n and adults is RISING on the global scale!
r “legislation” for a “ban” or “restriction” have f
latant ignorant to the fact that MGM is outlawe
olence against a child is NOT a private matter.
… this truth is NOT discussable!
a society is easily seen in how it protects its chi
PRIMUM NON NOCERE
EST MAIOR PROBATIO QUAM EVIDENTIA REI”
ltimate evidence is that in the thing itself”
>Fiat justitia ruat caelum<
Let justice be done though the heavens fall”
ection
how many people
utilation. Thether European
cal against FGM and
c of interactivity is
ngst themselves”;
roup-activities on
of parents, doctors,
llacy “that MGM
king for “legislation
/ the fallacy
HILD ABUSE.
st movement?
ailed!
d!
ldren.”
7/29/2019 Self-Reflection of the Intactivist Movement for Possible Self-Correction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/self-reflection-of-the-intactivist-movement-for-possible-self-correction 2/3
D) To “petition” for a “ban” or “restriction” on this CHILD ABUSE remains to be absolutely estranged
from the empiric reality of current liberal democratic right state law, therefore absolutely law-reality
contradictive and in this nonsensical and counterproductive and is an additional slap in the face of
every CHILD and the Value of Justice for All.
E) The result of these “petitions” is that the Pro-Circ-Insanity has gained insane momentum insteadof having been cured!
F) These CHILD MUTILATING LUNATICS and their LUNATIC ACCOMPLICES have countered with the
INSANITY of an all in all >unconstitutional< and therefore ILLEGAL enactment of the LUNATIC-Law
“outlaw the outlawing of MGM”!
G) 99% of the intactivist movement acts / reacts as if this counteraction were “legitimate”!
H) 99% of the intactivist movement remains to “see” the FGM-Law as “legitimate”-law; being
ignorant of the undisputable fact that the FGM-Law is indeed a >discriminatory< and therefore
>unconstitutional< Law, due to the fact that the FGM-Law EXCLUDES the male-child population fromits state guaranteed constitutional right of equal protection, and that it was never required to be
enacted in the first place, simply because of the empiric fact of current law under which MGM and
FGM is already equally OUTLAWED!
I) 99% of the intactivist movement insists to refuse to acknowledge these empiric facts.
J) 99% of the intactivist movement insist to refuse to admit to having been blind to these
fundamental failures, and insist to refuse to cooperate with the only intactivist forum which provides
this undisputable information globally since many years, namely the Global Symposium for an Intact
Humanity; and refuses to endorse its Official Statement and Universal Declaration of Demand for Law
Enforcement on MGM!
Is this an attack on the global intactivist movement?
NO it is NOT!
Is this the factual TRUTH about the dynamic of the global intactivist movement?
YES it is!
Do I love and respect every intactivist for speaking out against this Global Collective Child Abuse
and am glad for every child saved by any of these efforts?
YES I DO! YES I AM!
Is it high time for the global intactivist movement to acknowledge empiric evidence and so to
distance itself from this global deceitful fallacy of “calling for legislation”; “calling for restriction”;
“asking to please make an informed choice to not mutilate the child”; “acting as if such a legal right
of choice were to exist”; “acting as if MGM were not already outlawed”?
YES: … simply because of the empiric fact of law that MGM IS ALREADY OUTLAWED; that we do NOT
face a “legislation-problem”; that “a legal right of choice to mutilate the child does NOT EXIST” and
that >we indeed face a law enforcement problem< and that the Key to End this Global Collective
Child Abuse of Forced Circumcision is to cooperate within the Global Symposium for an Intact
Humanity by way of ENDORSEMENT of our Official Position expressed in its Official Statement and
Universal Declaration of Demand from the Authority to Enforce the Law on MGM!
7/29/2019 Self-Reflection of the Intactivist Movement for Possible Self-Correction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/self-reflection-of-the-intactivist-movement-for-possible-self-correction 3/3
YES IT IS HIGH TIME that also Y
GLOBAL CHILDREN´s RIGHTS DE
I am certain and you too can be
RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION b
discussions and research” wherCircumcision is WAY BEYOND A
COMPROMISE!
Do I or the children “beg” you /
responsibility to act in accordan
No we do NOT.
I DEMAND OF YOU TO ACT COR
OF US!
LO
HEAR I
I am able to uYou should be able
Endorse the Universal declarati
pos
Prof. Amen Ronald Oberhollenz
Responsible Co-Scholar in the Sc
Global Symposium for an Intact
www.intacthumanity.org
“Let
U my dear Fellow Intactivist COOPERATE in thi
FENSE ADVOCACY!
certain that EVERY CHILD expects from US ADUL
y way of GLOBAL LEGAL ACTION and not by way
in view of what is being done to the children it iY DISCUSSION and RESEARCH and certainly WA
“ask” you / “petition” you to fulfill your uprigh
ce with the current law?
RECT, in the same clarity as every child DEMAN
K WHAT IS BEING DONE TO THE CHILD!
S SCREAMS, which are its clear DEMAND …
derstand and am ready to fulfill whatever the cto understand and be ready to fulfill whatever t
SO:
n of Demand for Law Enforcement and promot
ible, so to enable others to do the same.
r
hool of Humanity
umanity
Fiat justitia ruat caelum<ustice be done though the heavens fall”.
s sense of CORRECT
S to PROTECT ITS
of “mere
s clear that ForcedBEYOND ANY
human
DS THIS FROM ALL
st.he cost.
it as widespread as
