16
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University In collaboration with: ACS GTO team (PI Ford), PEARS Team (PI Malhotra)

Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

  • Upload
    halia

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra. Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University. In collaboration with: ACS GTO team (PI Ford), PEARS Team (PI Malhotra). Grism data. Finding Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) Example: HDFN GTO data G800L (3 orbits), F775W, F850LP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Selection and Characterization of

Interesting Grism Spectra

Selection and Characterization of

Interesting Grism Spectra

Gerhardt R. MeurerThe Johns Hopkins University

Gerhardt R. MeurerThe Johns Hopkins University

In collaboration with: ACS GTO team (PI Ford), PEARS Team (PI Malhotra)

Page 2: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Grism dataGrism data

Finding Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs)Example: HDFN GTO dataG800L (3 orbits), F775W, F850LP

Finding SupernovaeExample: PEARS dataG800L (5-6 orbits/ roll angle), F606W, F775W

Peculiarities of grism dataWide wavelength responseWavelength solution position dependentMultiple orders

Finding Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs)Example: HDFN GTO dataG800L (3 orbits), F775W, F850LP

Finding SupernovaeExample: PEARS dataG800L (5-6 orbits/ roll angle), F606W, F775W

Peculiarities of grism dataWide wavelength responseWavelength solution position dependentMultiple orders

Page 3: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Initial processingInitial processing

Flatfield with F814W flatFirst order removal of blemishesFlattens sky

Geometric correction, align and combineUse Apsis (GTO pipeline)Alignment across spectra to better than 0.5

pix for offsets < 6”Improved CR rejectionMakes spectra nearly horizontalDecreases variation in wavelength solution

Flatfield with F814W flatFirst order removal of blemishesFlattens sky

Geometric correction, align and combineUse Apsis (GTO pipeline)Alignment across spectra to better than 0.5

pix for offsets < 6”Improved CR rejectionMakes spectra nearly horizontalDecreases variation in wavelength solution

Page 4: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Removal of order 0Removal of order 0 Match direct image to

zeroth order sources in direct image

match code by MR RichLinear transformation

Determine flux scalingF775W/zero = 32F850LP/zero = 21

Identify pixels that will be above noise level in zeroth order

Grow by 3 pixels (convolve with circular top hat)

Mask

Match direct image to zeroth order sources in direct image

match code by MR RichLinear transformation

Determine flux scalingF775W/zero = 32F850LP/zero = 21

Identify pixels that will be above noise level in zeroth order

Grow by 3 pixels (convolve with circular top hat)

Mask

Page 5: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

A. Direct image selectionA. Direct image selection

(A for aXe) Extract all sources in

F775W down to mAB

= 26.5 using aXe Unsharp mask :

subtract 19 pixel median smoothed spec.

Flag spectra with residuals/error > 4.

Classify by eye

(A for aXe) Extract all sources in

F775W down to mAB

= 26.5 using aXe Unsharp mask :

subtract 19 pixel median smoothed spec.

Flag spectra with residuals/error > 4.

Classify by eye

Example object 2325:

Direct image

Grism image

1D spectrum & fit

Page 6: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

(B for Blind extraction) Unsharp mask entire grism &

detection images (subtract 13x3 median filtered image).

Find candidates in grism image with SExtractor.

Weed out obvious bad sources. Extract & collapse 1D cuts Cross correlate grism & direct to

get offset Use aXe solution to get

wavelength Use G800L Flux cal. curve to

derive F. Classify by eye

(B for Blind extraction) Unsharp mask entire grism &

detection images (subtract 13x3 median filtered image).

Find candidates in grism image with SExtractor.

Weed out obvious bad sources. Extract & collapse 1D cuts Cross correlate grism & direct to

get offset Use aXe solution to get

wavelength Use G800L Flux cal. curve to

derive F. Classify by eye

B. grism image selectionB. grism image selection

Example: object 135

Page 7: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) found

Emission Line Galaxies (ELGs) found

Method A: 30 ELGs (32 sources of line

emission) 7 ELGs unique to method A

Method B: 39 ELGs (49 sources of line

emission) Three **** multiple knot

galaxies 12 ELGS unique to method

B

Method A: 30 ELGs (32 sources of line

emission) 7 ELGs unique to method A

Method B: 39 ELGs (49 sources of line

emission) Three **** multiple knot

galaxies 12 ELGS unique to method

B

Page 8: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Line identificationLine identification

Multiple linesUse ratio of

wavelengthsMajority of sources

have just one lineNeed a first guess

redshiftSize not good for

first guessWe use photo-z

Multiple linesUse ratio of

wavelengthsMajority of sources

have just one lineNeed a first guess

redshiftSize not good for

first guessWe use photo-z

Page 9: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Line identification in detailLine identification in detail

Use prior redshift as first guess Spectroscopy:

Cohen et al (2004)Photo-z: Hawaii

group (Capak et al, 2004)

Guess line is one ofH,

[OIII]5007+4959, H, [OII] Ly

Use prior redshift as first guess Spectroscopy:

Cohen et al (2004)Photo-z: Hawaii

group (Capak et al, 2004)

Guess line is one ofH,

[OIII]5007+4959, H, [OII] Ly

Page 10: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

ResultsResults 46 ELGs (mergeded A &

B) in HDF-N Lines identified:

H (8) [OIII] (24) H (4) H (1) [OII] (13)

Includes rather faint targets

Redshift accuracy z ~ 0.01

46 ELGs (mergeded A & B) in HDF-N Lines identified:

H (8) [OIII] (24) H (4) H (1) [OII] (13)

Includes rather faint targets

Redshift accuracy z ~ 0.01

Page 11: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Colors useful for constraining ELG redshifts

Colors useful for constraining ELG redshifts

Best ACS/WFC bands F435W,F775W(,F850LP

) Best ground based

Four filters U,B,V,z Three filters U,V,z Two filters: U,V

In general Cover large

wavelength range At least one rest frame

UV filter

Best ACS/WFC bands F435W,F775W(,F850LP

) Best ground based

Four filters U,B,V,z Three filters U,V,z Two filters: U,V

In general Cover large

wavelength range At least one rest frame

UV filter

Page 12: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Finding supernovae In PEARS data

Finding supernovae In PEARS data

Deep spectroscopy of GOODS feildsTypically 7 orbits per roll angle with

G800LVery short direct exposures F606WUse these to align to GOODS images

Can not count on a direct image detection of Supernovae

Deep spectroscopy of GOODS feildsTypically 7 orbits per roll angle with

G800LVery short direct exposures F606WUse these to align to GOODS images

Can not count on a direct image detection of Supernovae

Page 13: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Finding supernovae without a direct image

Finding supernovae without a direct image

Need to find first order spectra of compact sources

Squash grism image Rebin 25x1

Run SExtractor Filter output catalog

Remove small sources (order 0)elongated sources (galaxies)

Left with stars and compact galaxies (mostly)

Need to find first order spectra of compact sources

Squash grism image Rebin 25x1

Run SExtractor Filter output catalog

Remove small sources (order 0)elongated sources (galaxies)

Left with stars and compact galaxies (mostly)

Page 14: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Supernova Hunt 2Supernova Hunt 2

Extract spectra Collapse 5 rows of

grism image No wavelength or flux

calibration

Classify by eye Typically ~500

sources Takes ~ 1/2 hour

Compare to GOODS images

Extract spectra Collapse 5 rows of

grism image No wavelength or flux

calibration

Classify by eye Typically ~500

sources Takes ~ 1/2 hour

Compare to GOODS images

Page 15: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

Finessing the processFinessing the process

Match squashed grism image catalog to direct catalog Make 2s error box ~

****

Filter grism image before squashing

Subtract aXe model and filter residual image

Match squashed grism image catalog to direct catalog Make 2s error box ~

****

Filter grism image before squashing

Subtract aXe model and filter residual image

Page 16: Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra

SummarySummary

ELGs and SNe relatively easily found in flat-fielded, geometrically corrected grism images

Dozens of ELGs per WFC field even in “short” exposures Can go fainter than 8+m telescopes with small HST

time allotment.

Main remaining challenge is line identification. Need multiband photometry for first guess redshift Deeper exposures needed to bring out both [OIII]

and H at modest z

ELGs and SNe relatively easily found in flat-fielded, geometrically corrected grism images

Dozens of ELGs per WFC field even in “short” exposures Can go fainter than 8+m telescopes with small HST

time allotment.

Main remaining challenge is line identification. Need multiband photometry for first guess redshift Deeper exposures needed to bring out both [OIII]

and H at modest z