84
Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 Research Report No. 21-09 Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College October 2009 (Updated May 2010)

Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Research Report No. 21-09

Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College

October 2009 (Updated May 2010)

Page 2: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND ASSESSMENT The purpose of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment is to conduct analytical studies and provide information in support of institutional planning, policy formulation and decision making. In addition, the office provides leadership and support in research related activities to members of the NOVA community engaged in planning and evaluating the institution’s success in accomplishing its mission.

4001 Wakefield Chapel Road Annandale, VA 22003-3796

(703) 323-3129 www.nvcc.edu/oir

When citing data from this report, the Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) Office of Institutional Research,

Planning, and Assessment must be cited as the source.

Page 3: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

i

Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Table of Contents Page Explanatory Notes for Tables 1 through 14 ................................................................................. 1

Table 1: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2009-10 Final Allocation with ME

Adjustment ......................................................................................................................... 4

Table 2: Size of the Campus Based on Fall FTES -- Fall 2008 .................................................... 5

Table 3: Growth by Campus -- Fall 2008 and Fall 2009 .............................................................. 5

Table 4: Part-Time Faculty Proportion by Campus -- Fall 2009 ................................................... 6

Table 5: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2009 .................................................................... 6

Table 6: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2009-10 .......................................................... 7

Table 7.AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ......................................................................................................................... 7

Table 7.AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ......................................................................................................................... 9

Table 7.LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 11

Table 7.MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 13

Table 7.ME: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 15

Table 7.WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 16

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 ............... 19

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .............. 21

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .............. 23

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .............. 25

Table 8.ME: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .............. 27

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 ............. 28

Table 9.AL: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 30

Table 9.AN: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 32

Table 9.LO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 34

Page 4: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

ii

Table 9.MA: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 36

Table 9.ME: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 38

Table 9.WO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus

and Discipline -- Fall 2009 ................................................................................................ 39

Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .......................... 41

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .......................... 43

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 .......................... 45

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 ......................... 47

Table 10.ME: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 ......................... 49

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009......................... 50

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 .......................................................... 52

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 .......................................................... 54

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 .......................................................... 56

Table 11.MA: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 ......................................................... 58

Table 11.ME: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 ......................................................... 59

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 ......................................................... 60

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 ......................................................... 62

Table 12: Comparison of Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee Student/Faculty Ratios ............ 64

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios ........... 65

Table 14: Course Prefixes and Descriptions ............................................................................. 67

APPENDIX: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline

-- Fall 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 69

Page 5: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

1

Explanatory Notes for Tables 1 through 14 Table 1 Table 1 demonstrates how faculty positions are allocated to all the campuses. The model takes into account campus size, campus growth, the proportion of part-time faculty at the campus, programmatic mix, and the current vacancy ratio. Based on these factors, full-time faculty positions are allocated to the campuses. Table footnotes provide information on the factors and computations used in the tables. Table 1 presents the 30 new positions available for distribution with 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) being reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1. Table 2 Table 2 shows the campus size in terms of FTES. It also shows the proportion of college FTES contributed by each campus for Fall 2008. Table 3 Table 3 gives FTES for Fall 2007, Fall 2008, and Fall 2009 by campus and for the college. In addition, it shows the percent change in FTES from Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 and Fall 2008 to Fall 2009. The average percent change over the two-year period is also shown in the table. Table 4 Table 4 shows full-time, part-time, and total teaching credit hours for each campus. In addition, the table gives the proportion (PT proportion) of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty at each campus. Table 5 Table 5 presents the campus multiple which is computed from the product of the discipline credits and discipline ratio and summed for the campus. In addition, the table gives the campus credit hours. The campus ratio (programmatic mix) is derived by dividing the campus multiple by the campus credit hours.

Page 6: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

2

Table 6 Table 6 summarizes the number of available positions and allocated 9-month teaching positions for 2009-10. It presents the distribution of 30 new positions available with 10% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) being reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. Tables 7.AL through 7.WO Tables 7.AL through 7.WO provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2009 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline

is calculated. (The FTEF Requirement in column 4, is calculated as ). The tables also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources department. If faculty teach multiple disciplines, the headcount is split equally between disciplines. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty headcount. Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester. Tables 8.AL through 8.WO Tables 8.AL through 8.WO give FTES information by campus for each discipline. The five-year trend in FTES, Fall 2005 to Fall 2009, is displayed for each discipline along with the percent change from Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 and the average FTES over the time period. For disciplines that do not have data available for all 5 years, percent change is not given, however average FTES are based on the available data. The FTES data given for Fall 2009 are for the middle of the Fall 2009 semester and are therefore not the final figures. Tables 9.AL through 9.WO Tables 9.AL through 9.WO give the teaching credit hours (TCH) by campus and discipline. The tables show full-time and part-time faculty teaching credit hours and total faculty teaching credit hours (the sum of full- and part-time TCH) and the proportion of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty. The tables are sorted from highest to lowest according to the part-time proportion. The data shown in this table was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester. Tables 10.AL through 10.WO Tables 10.AL through 10.WO provide discipline productivity information for each campus for five years. Discipline productivity is expressed as a percentage and is computed by dividing the actual discipline semester ratio of FTES to FTEF by the current funded ratio. Beginning in Fall 2005, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model was used to calculate this data. In Fall 2006, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) was revised. Due to this revision, the efficiency factor for NOVA was changed from 1.17 in Fall 2005 to 1.103 in Fall 2006. For Fall 2008 and Fall 2009, adjunct faculty FTEF was calculated according to load. In prior years, FTEF figures came from the “Discipline Performance Statistics Report” produced by the Information Technology department. The FTEF data from this report derived FTEF from faculty load.

Page 7: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

3

For Fall 2005, productivity data for the English and Math disciplines is unavailable. Human Resources was unable to provide data that accurately reflects how FTEF for faculty teaching in these disciplines is split between English/Developmental English and Math/Developmental Math. As the developmental components of these two disciplines have different funded ratios from the non-developmental components, information concerning how the FTEF is subdivided is paramount to the calculation of productivity. Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI show, by campus (including ELI) and discipline, student credit hours generated, the discipline ratio, and the discipline multiple. The discipline multiple is computed by multiplying the credit hours by the ratio. The credits and the multiples are summed for each campus. The programmatic mix for the campus is calculated by dividing the total of the discipline multiples by the total of the discipline credit hours. Table 12 Table 12 compares the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty ratios. Table 13 Table 13 shows, by discipline, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) and the new ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. The table also displays, by discipline and campus, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) and the old ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. Table 14 Table 14 displays discipline prefixes used in this report and gives a description. As five-year trend data are displayed in this report, this table includes disciplines that may have been phased out within the last five years.

Page 8: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

4

Table 1 demonstrates how faculty positions are allocated to all the campuses. The model takes into account campus size, campus growth, the proportion of part-time faculty at the campus, programmatic mix, and the current vacancy ratio. Based on these factors, full-time faculty positions are allocated to the campuses. Table footnotes provide information on the factors and computations used in the tables. Table 1 presents the 30 new positions available for distribution with 11% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) being reserved for distribution through presidential discretion. MEC is removed from the allocation model in Table 1.

Table 1: Allocation of Teaching Faculty Positions in 2009-10 Final Allocation with ME Adjustment Based on 30 New Positions, 26 Vacancies, and 11% Presidential Discretion

(50 Available Positions)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Size

Growth (Avg. of Fall 08 &

09)

(Growth x 20) +

100

Product (1 & 3)/

100 Percentage

PT

Product (4 & 5)/

100 Programmatic

Mix

Inverse of Programmatic

Mix Product (6 & 8)

Vacancy Adjustment

Product (9 & 10) % Allocation

Alexandria 22.1 5.1 202 44.8 52.4 23.4 23.0 4.3 100.6 134/126 107.0 20.4 (10) 10.40

Annandale 35.0 7.8 256 89.8 46.4 41.7 23.5 4.2 175.1 180/172 183.2 34.9 (18) 17.81

Loudoun 14.6 10.2 303 44.2 55.3 24.4 23.4 4.3 104.9 71/70 106.4 20.3 (10) 10.34

Manassas 10.0 6.3 225 22.5 52.3 11.8 23.3 4.3 50.7 55/51 54.7 10.4 (5) 5.32

Medical Ed. 3.8 3.3 166 6.3 28.7 1.8 11.5 8.7 15.7 67/62 --- --- --- ---

Woodbridge 14.5 4.9 198 28.7 54.0 15.5 23.0 4.4 68.2 70/65 73.4 14.0 (7) 7.13

Total 100.0 6.8

524.7 100.0 50 1 “Size” represents the percentage of the total number of FTES at each campus for Fall 2008 (Column 1). 2 “Growth” is measured in terms of the average percentage change in FTES between two periods: Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 and Fall 2008 to Fall 2009 (Column 2). 3 Column 3 shows the campus growth rate multiplied by 20 in the interest of emphasizing the growth factor. In order to remove the ‘minuses’ from the column, 100 was added to each resulting number. 4 “Percentage PT” represents the percentage of PT faculty (in Teaching Credit terms) for Fall 2009 (Column 5). Data Source: NOVA PeopleSoft Query 5 “Programmatic Mix” represents the weighted average of “funded ratios” of all disciplines of the campus, Fall 2008. (Column 7). 6 The Vacancy Adjustment is calculated by taking the Inverse of the ratio of the Number of Filled positions to the Number of Funded positions (Column 10). 7 Final allocation is made by apportioning the available positions on the basis of the percentages given in Column 12, which is based on the product in Column 11. In cases where the rounding up process produces a higher total than the actual number of positions to be allocated, one position is subtracted from the Campus with points closest to being rounded down (Column 13).

Page 9: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

5

Table 2 shows the campus size in terms of FTES. It also shows the proportion of college FTES contributed by each campus for Fall 2008.

Table 2: Size of the Campus Based on Fall FTES -- Fall 2008

Campus Fall 2008 FTES Percent

Alexandria 5,467 22.1 Annandale 8,661 35.0 Loudoun 3,601 14.6 Manassas 2,465 10.0 Medical Education 932 3.8 Woodbridge 3,584 14.5

College 24,710 100.0

Table 3 gives FTES for Fall 2007, Fall 2008, and Fall 2009 by campus and for the college. In addition, it shows the percent change in FTES from Fall 2007 to Fall 2008 and Fall 2008 to Fall 2009. The average percent change over the two-year period is also shown in the table.

Table 3: Growth by Campus -- Fall 2008 and Fall 2009

Campus Fall 2007 FTES

Fall 2008 FTES*

Fall 2009 FTES**

% Change FA07-FA08

% Change FA08-FA09

Average % Change

07-08 and 08-09

Alexandria 5,316 5,467 5,871 2.8 7.4 5.1

Annandale 8,521 8,661 9,873 1.6 14.0 7.8

Loudoun 3,392 3,601 4,110 6.2 14.1 10.2

Manassas 2,393 2,465 2,700 3.0 9.5 6.3

Medical Education 874 932 932 6.6 0.0 3.3

Woodbridge 3,608 3,584 3,958 -0.7 10.4 4.9

College 24,104 24,710 27,444 2.5 11.1 6.8

*Fall 2007 and Fall 2008 FTES were obtained from IRIS files. **Fall 2009 FTES were obtained from PeopleSoft in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester.

Page 10: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

6

Table 4 shows full-time, part-time, and total teaching credit hours for each campus. In addition, the table gives the proportion (PT proportion) of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty at each campus.

Table 4: Part-Time Faculty Proportion by Campus -- Fall 2009

Campus PT(adjunct)

Teaching Credit Hours

FT(9-mo) Teaching Credit

Hours

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion*

Alexandria 2,267 2,056 4,323 52.4 Annandale 2,806 3,241 6,047 46.4 Loudoun 1,532 1,237 2,769 55.3 Manassas 1,001 912 1,913 52.3 Medical Education 166 413 579 28.7 Woodbridge 1,626 1,384 3,010 54.0

College 9,398 9,243 18,641 50.4 Data Source: NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft Query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester *Refer to Table 9 for part-time faculty ratio by discipline.

Table 5 presents the campus multiple which is computed from the product of the discipline credits and discipline ratio and summed for the campus. In addition, the table gives the campus credit hours. The campus ratio (programmatic mix) is derived by dividing the campus multiple by the campus credit hours.

Table 5: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2009

Campus Credit Hours Multiple* Ratio

Alexandria 82,002 1,885,563 22.9 Annandale 129,908 3,057,389 23.5 Loudoun 54,020 1,266,381 23.4 Manassas 36,978 862,838 23.3 Medical Education 13,978 161,276 11.5 Woodbridge 53,765 1,234,111 22.9

College 370,651 8,467,558 22.8 *Refer to Explanatory Notes for Tables 11.AL through 11.WO (p.3) for details on Campus programmatic mix calculations.

Page 11: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

7

Table 6 summarizes the number of available positions and allocated 9-month teaching positions for 2009-10. It presents the distribution of 30 new positions available with 11% of all the positions (new positions and vacant positions) being reserved for distribution through presidential discretion.

Table 6: Current Vacant and Available Positions: 2009-10

Based on 30 New Positions and 10% Presidential Discretion

Available Positions Number

Allocated Positions Number Current Vacancies (5 Campuses) 26 Allocation by Model 50 Current MEC Vacancies 5 MEC Allocation 5 New Positions 30 Presidential Discretion 6 Total 61 Total 61

Tables 7.AL through 7.WO provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2009 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline

is calculated. (The FTEF Requirement in column 4, is calculated as ). The tables also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources department. If faculty teach multiple disciplines, the headcount is split equally between disciplines. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty headcount. Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester. NOTE: Refer to explanatory notes for FT Faculty Headcount at the end of the tables (p.18).

Table 7.AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

ACC 169.2 19.9 5.1 4 1.1 ADJ 25.0 19.9 0.8 --- --- ARA 29.5 19.9 0.9 1 -0.1 ARC 60.7 15.4 2.4 1 1.4 ART 216.8 19.9 6.5 7 -0.5 AST 3.8 19.9 0.1 1 -0.9 AUB 12.8 15.4 0.5 1 -0.5 AUT 81.7 15.4 3.2 7 -3.8 BIO 431.6 26.5 9.8 9 0.8 BLD 25.2 15.4 1.0 1 0.0 BUS 134.8 19.9 4.1 6 -1.9 CHD 89.8 19.9 2.7 2 0.7 CHI 13.9 19.9 0.4 --- --- CHM 153.1 26.5 3.5 4 -0.5 CIV 11.6 15.4 0.5 --- --- CON 32.0 19.9 1.0 1 0.0 CSC 43.3 26.5 1.0 --- --- CST* 172.6 26.5 3.9 4 -0.1

Page 12: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

8

Table 7.AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

DEVE** 268.7 19.9 8.1 3 5.1 DEVM*** 160.5 19.9 4.8 --- --- DRF 39.2 15.4 1.5 1 0.5 ECO 142.4 26.5 3.2 2 1.2 EDU 6.0 19.9 0.2 --- --- EGR 20.1 15.4 0.8 --- --- ENG 450.4 26.5 10.2 12 -1.8 ESL 584.9 23.2 15.1 15 0.1 FIN 4.2 19.9 0.1 --- --- FRE 49.7 19.9 1.5 2 -0.5 GEO 19.6 26.5 0.4 --- --- GER 5.7 19.9 0.2 --- --- GOL 59.9 26.5 1.4 1 0.4 GRE 3.8 19.9 0.1 --- --- HIN 1.7 19.9 0.1 --- --- HIS 335.5 26.5 7.6 5 2.6 HLT 5.4 11.0 0.3 --- --- HMS 28.4 19.9 0.9 --- --- HUM 31.5 26.5 0.7 0.5 0.2 IT --- --- --- 10 --- ITA 21.4 19.9 0.6 --- --- ITD 29.2 19.9 0.9 --- --- ITE 161.0 19.9 4.9 --- --- ITN 70.9 19.9 2.1 --- --- ITP 58.7 19.9 1.8 --- --- JPN 45.5 19.9 1.4 1 0.4 LAT 8.2 19.9 0.2 --- --- LGL 101.8 19.9 3.1 1 2.1 MKT 20.0 19.9 0.6 --- --- MTH 289.9 26.5 6.6 10 -3.4 MUS 76.1 19.9 2.3 2 0.3 NAS 96.8 15.4 3.8 --- --- PED 126.5 26.5 2.9 2 0.9 PHI 58.4 26.5 1.3 1 0.3 PHT 83.9 19.9 2.5 3 -0.5 PHY 65.3 26.5 1.5 2 -0.5 PLS 55.0 26.5 1.2 1 0.2 PSY 237.2 26.5 5.4 2 3.4 REA 12.6 19.9 0.4 --- --- REL 26.6 26.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 RUS 18.3 19.9 0.6 --- --- SDV 93.4 26.5 2.1 --- --- SOC 78.8 26.5 1.8 2 -0.2 SPA 103.3 19.9 3.1 2 1.1 VTN 7.1 19.9 0.2 --- ---

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 13: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

9

Table 7.AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

ACC 233.4 19.9 7.0 5 2.0 ADJ 166.1 19.9 5.0 3 2.0 ARA 38.3 19.9 1.2 --- --- ARC 53.5 15.4 2.1 2 0.1 ART 214.2 19.9 6.5 4.5 2.0 ASL 99.7 19.9 3.0 2 1.0 BIO 796.3 26.5 18.0 12 6.0 BUS 228.4 19.9 6.9 3 3.9 CHI 20.4 19.9 0.6 --- --- CHM 184.3 26.5 4.2 5 -0.8 CSC 104.6 26.5 2.4 3 -0.6 CST* 295.4 26.5 6.7 8 -1.3 DEVE** 577.4 19.9 17.4 5 12.4 DEVM*** 459.0 19.9 13.8 --- --- DIT 57.8 11.0 3.2 1 2.2 DRF 23.2 15.4 0.9 1.5 -0.6 ECO 257.6 26.5 5.83 5 0.83 EDU 8.8 19.9 0.3 --- --- EGR 119.3 15.4 4.6 3.5 1.1 ENG 943.7 26.5 21.4 23 -1.6 ENV 5.2 15.4 0.2 --- --- ESL 605.7 23.2 15.7 15 0.7 ETR 10.7 15.4 0.4 1 -0.6 FIN 18.4 19.9 0.6 --- --- FRE 45.3 19.9 1.4 --- --- FST 13.0 19.9 0.4 1 -0.6 GEO 7.8 26.5 0.2 --- --- GER 20.7 19.9 0.6 --- --- GOL 76.7 26.5 1.7 2 -0.3 HIS 668.4 26.5 15.1 7 8.1 HRI 106.1 19.9 3.2 2 1.2 HUM 36.8 26.5 0.8 0.5 0.3 INT 23.4 19.9 0.7 --- --- IT --- --- --- 10 --- ITD 28.2 19.9 0.9 --- --- ITE 331.4 19.9 10.0 --- --- ITN 66.6 19.9 2.0 --- --- ITP 47.3 19.9 1.4 --- --- KOR 12.7 19.9 0.4 --- --- MEC 2.0 15.4 0.1 --- --- MKT 60.6 19.9 1.8 1 0.8 MSC 3.0 26.5 0.1 --- --- MTH 870.5 26.5 19.7 21 -1.3 MUS 101.5 19.9 3.1 3 0.1 NAS 241.3 15.4 9.4 4 5.4

Page 14: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

10

Table 7.AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and

Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

PED 267.3 26.5 6.1 4 2.1 PHI 151.4 26.5 3.4 2 1.4 PHY 133.5 26.5 3.0 3 0.0 PLS 51.6 26.5 1.2 1 0.2 PSY 403.8 26.5 9.1 6 3.1 REA 2.9 19.9 0.1 1 -0.9 REL 14.0 26.5 0.3 --- --- RPK 19.8 19.9 0.6 1 -0.4 SDV 126.5 26.5 2.9 --- --- SOC 227.8 26.5 5.2 2 3.2 SPA 158.6 19.9 4.8 4 0.8 TRV 30.6 19.9 0.9 1 -0.1

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 15: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

11

Table 7.LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

ACC 122.6 19.9 3.7 2 1.7 ARA 14.1 19.9 0.4 --- --- ART 160.9 19.9 4.9 5 -0.1 AST 3.1 19.9 0.1 --- --- BIO 174.5 26.5 4.0 6 -2.0 BUS 103.8 19.9 3.1 2 1.1 CHD 39.8 19.9 1.2 1 0.2 CHM 81.8 26.5 1.9 2 -0.1 CSC 37.4 26.5 0.8 --- --- CST* 129.8 26.5 2.9 2 0.9 DEVE** 241.9 19.9 7.3 4 3.3 DEVM*** 239.1 19.9 7.2 --- --- ECO 127.6 26.5 2.9 2 0.9 EDU 4.4 19.9 0.1 --- --- ENG 381.1 26.5 8.6 8.5 0.1 ENV 2.8 15.4 0.1 --- --- ESL 204.3 23.2 5.3 4.5 0.8 FIN 6.8 19.9 0.2 --- --- FRE 8.3 19.9 0.3 --- --- GEO 57.6 26.5 1.3 1 0.3 GER 9.9 19.9 0.3 --- --- GIS 16.4 19.9 0.5 1 -0.5 GOL 90.1 26.5 2.0 2 0.0 HIS 386.0 26.5 8.7 3 5.7 HLT 6.2 11.0 0.3 --- --- HRT 37.3 15.4 1.5 2 -0.5 HUM 18.8 26.5 0.4 --- --- IDS 38.8 19.9 1.2 2 -0.8 IT --- --- --- 4 --- ITA 11.8 19.9 0.4 --- --- ITD 6.6 19.9 0.2 --- --- ITE 153.7 19.9 4.6 --- --- ITN 22.3 19.9 0.7 --- --- ITP 19.7 19.9 0.6 --- --- MKT 16.0 19.9 0.5 --- --- MTH 370.7 26.5 8.4 10 -1.6 MUS 57.6 19.9 1.7 1 0.7 NAS 68.3 15.4 2.7 --- --- PED 72.5 26.5 1.6 1 0.6 PHI 28.6 26.5 0.6 --- --- PLS 32.6 26.5 0.7 --- --- PSY 205.4 26.5 4.7 3 1.7 REL 40.6 26.5 0.9 --- --- RUS 5.7 19.9 0.2 --- --- SDV 31.5 26.5 0.7 --- ---

Page 16: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

12

Table 7.LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

SOC 81.6 26.5 1.8 1 0.8 SPA 68.9 19.9 2.1 1 1.1 VET 71.1 11.0 3.9 4 -0.1

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 17: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

13

Table 7.MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

ACC 51.2 19.9 1.5 2 -0.5 ADJ 70.4 19.9 2.1 1 1.1 ARA 9.5 19.9 0.3 --- --- ART 86.0 19.9 2.6 2 0.6 AUT 75.0 15.4 2.9 5 -2.1 BIO 199.2 26.5 4.5 3 1.5 BUS 47.6 19.9 1.4 1 0.4 CHD 75.0 19.9 2.3 3 -0.7 CHM 43.1 26.5 1.0 1 0.0 CSC 24.3 26.5 0.6 --- --- CST* 92.6 26.5 2.1 3 -0.9 DEVE** 192.1 19.9 5.8 1 4.8 DEVM*** 150.9 19.9 4.5 --- --- DSL 6.1 15.4 0.2 --- --- ECO 86.8 26.5 2.0 1 1.0 EDU 18.8 19.9 0.6 --- --- EGR 1.2 15.4 0.0 --- --- ENG 261.7 26.5 5.9 7 -1.1 ENV 4.8 15.4 0.2 --- --- ESL 136.0 23.2 3.5 4 -0.5 ETR 2.1 15.4 0.1 --- --- FIN 7.6 19.9 0.2 --- --- FRE 10.1 19.9 0.3 --- --- GEO 5.4 26.5 0.1 --- --- GOL 12.5 26.5 0.3 --- --- HIS 176.0 26.5 4.0 5 -1.0 HLT 9.8 11.0 0.5 --- --- IT --- --- --- 4 --- ITD 24.6 19.9 0.7 --- --- ITE 95.4 19.9 2.9 --- --- ITN 36.0 19.9 1.1 --- --- ITP 15.3 19.9 0.5 --- --- MEC 3.2 15.4 0.1 --- --- MKT 4.4 19.9 0.1 --- --- MTH 201.9 26.5 4.6 7 -2.4 MUS 11.4 19.9 0.3 --- --- NAS 21.9 15.4 0.9 --- --- PED 54.4 26.5 1.2 1 0.2 PHI 9.4 26.5 0.2 --- --- PHY 22.5 26.5 0.5 1 -0.5 PLS 16.4 26.5 0.4 --- --- PSY 154.8 26.5 3.5 3 0.5 REL 11.6 26.5 0.3 --- --- SDV 46.2 26.5 1.0 --- --- SOC 39.6 26.5 0.9 --- ---

Page 18: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

14

Table 7.MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

SPA 63.1 19.9 1.9 1 0.9 WEL 12.1 15.4 0.5 1 -0.5

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 19: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

15

Table 7.ME: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Medical Education

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

DMS 14.6 11.0 0.8 8 -7.2 DNH 71.2 11.0 3.9 5 -1.1 EMS 107.7 11.0 5.9 5 0.9 HIM* 68.7 11.0 3.7 2 1.7 HLT 121.2 11.0 6.6 1 5.6 MDL 23.9 11.0 1.3 3 -1.7 NUR 282.1 11.0 15.4 26 -10.6 PTH 55.2 11.0 3.0 3 0.0 RAD 99.4 11.0 5.4 --- --- ROC 3.7 11.0 0.2 1 -0.8 RTH 34.5 11.0 1.9 6 -4.1 SDV 49.9 26.5 1.1 --- ---

*Formerly HIT --- Data not available

Page 20: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

16

Table 7.WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

ACC 157.8 19.9 4.8 4 0.8 ADJ 110.6 19.9 3.3 2 1.3 AIR 93.3 15.4 3.6 4 -0.4 ART 113.5 19.9 3.4 2 1.4 AST 34.4 19.9 1.0 1 0.0 BIO 197.3 26.5 4.5 4 0.5 BUS 191.4 19.9 5.8 4 1.8 CHD 6.6 19.9 0.2 --- --- CHM 34.1 26.5 0.8 1 -0.2 CSC 23.5 26.5 0.5 1 -0.5 CST* 141.6 26.5 3.2 2 1.2 DEVE** 304.1 19.9 9.2 3 6.2 DEVM*** 152.3 19.9 4.6 --- --- ECO 80.6 26.5 1.8 1 0.8 EDU 4.8 19.9 0.1 --- --- ENG 406.4 26.5 9.2 9 0.2 ESL 148.0 23.2 3.8 4 -0.2 ETR 21.3 15.4 0.8 --- --- FIN 16.6 19.9 0.5 --- --- FRE 9.7 19.9 0.3 --- --- GEO 9.2 26.5 0.2 --- --- GER 20.1 19.9 0.6 --- --- GOL 18.9 26.5 0.4 1 -0.6 HIS 274.2 26.5 6.2 4 2.2 HLT 12.8 11.0 0.7 --- --- HUM 22.8 26.5 0.5 --- --- IT --- --- --- 7 --- ITD 34.6 19.9 1.0 --- --- ITE 236.5 19.9 7.1 --- --- ITN 58.8 19.9 1.8 --- --- ITP 54.3 19.9 1.6 --- --- LBR 0.3 19.9 0.0 --- --- MEC 9.7 15.4 0.4 --- --- MKT 13.4 19.9 0.4 --- --- MTH 207.6 26.5 4.7 7 -2.3 MUS 7.5 19.9 0.2 --- --- NAS 74.4 15.4 2.9 --- --- PBS 3.0 19.9 0.1 --- --- PED 53.9 26.5 1.2 1 0.2 PHI 14.0 26.5 0.3 --- --- PHT 37.6 19.9 1.1 1 0.1 PHY 28.8 26.5 0.7 --- --- PLS 3.0 26.5 0.1 --- --- PSY 187.4 26.5 4.2 3 1.2 REA 1.6 19.9 0.0 --- ---

Page 21: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

17

Table 7.WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and Faculty Headcount by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement

FT Faculty Headcount Difference

REL 24.0 26.5 0.5 --- --- SDV 60.2 26.5 1.4 --- --- SOC 120.8 26.5 2.7 1 1.7 SPA 121.0 19.9 3.6 4 -0.4

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 22: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

18

Data provided in the Full-Time Faculty Headcount column (FT Faculty Headcount) of Tables 7.AN – 7.WO is from the Human Resources department and is a snapshot of the current full-time faculty as of September 29, 2009. The data presented in this column reflect data as recorded in the Human Resources department. If any discrepancy is found between the data presented and the actual headcounts in the respective divisions, the divisions may contact the Human Resources department for clarifications. If there is a need, OIR will assist in this process. Some disciplines are classified by Human Resources differently from what is used at the divisions. For example, though faculty may be assigned to the ITE, ITD, ITN, and ITP disciplines, Human Resources maintains information as IT.

Page 23: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

19

Tables 8.AL through 8.WO give FTES information by campus for each discipline. The five-year trend in FTES, Fall 2005 to Fall 2009, is displayed for each discipline along with the percent change from Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 and the average FTES over the time period. For disciplines that do not have data available for all 5 years, percent change is not given, however average FTES are based on the available data. The FTES data given for Fall 2009 are for the middle of the Fall 2009 semester and are therefore not the final figures.

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

ACC 165.2 153.8 167.0 159.8 169.2 2.4 163.0 ACQ 14.0 9.4 4.0 --- --- --- 9.1 ADJ 16.2 21.0 13.0 23.0 25.0 54.3 19.6 ARA 25.4 31.4 32.4 35.7 29.5 16.1 30.9 ARC 50.7 50.7 57.8 44.7 60.7 19.7 52.9 ART 171.2 160.7 166.8 190.2 216.8 26.6 181.1 AST 16.6 14.8 39.6 39.2 3.8 -77.1 22.8 AUB 9.3 11.5 17.9 12.3 12.8 37.6 12.8 AUT 106.4 98.3 109.0 110.1 81.7 -23.2 101.1 BIO 257.9 242.7 278.7 318.1 431.6 67.4 305.8 BLD 26.9 32.7 35.3 34.3 25.2 -6.3 30.9 BUS 148.6 124.8 153.6 145.0 134.8 -9.3 141.4 CHD 103.2 97.0 83.0 87.4 89.8 -13.0 92.1 CHI 15.6 26.0 25.6 6.5 13.9 -10.9 17.5 CHM 117.7 101.2 105.3 131.5 153.1 30.1 121.8 CIV 7.2 8.0 10.2 12.0 11.6 61.1 9.8 CON --- 3.0 11.2 13.8 32.0 --- 15.0 CSC 42.9 32.9 37.7 40.4 43.3 0.9 39.4 CST* 143.1 142.2 157.6 155.2 172.6 20.6 154.1 DEVE** 222.9 225.9 251.8 258.4 268.7 20.5 245.5 DEVM*** 144.1 113.5 141.9 157.2 160.5 11.4 143.4 DRF 44.8 39.5 44.6 36.3 39.2 -12.5 40.9 ECO 125.9 116.1 107.4 110.8 142.4 13.1 120.5 EDU 14.0 17.0 18.7 6.5 6.0 -57.1 12.4 EGR 18.9 13.9 14.9 14.1 20.1 6.3 16.4 ENG 312.8 321.5 366.4 416.5 450.4 44.0 373.5 ESL 586.5 619.5 681.7 639.9 584.9 -0.3 622.5 ETR --- 0.3 --- --- --- --- 0.3 FIN 8.0 8.0 10.4 12.7 4.2 -47.5 8.7 FRE 34.1 39.3 35.5 34.7 49.7 45.7 38.7 GEO 17.8 15.2 21.0 21.6 19.6 10.1 19.0 GER 10.6 3.8 6.0 6.3 5.7 -46.2 6.5 GOL 49.5 44.0 41.6 57.1 59.9 21.0 50.4 GRE 3.2 4.2 2.8 2.8 3.8 18.8 3.4 HIN --- --- --- 3.3 1.7 --- 2.5 HIS 257.2 242.8 257.2 299.0 335.5 30.4 278.3

Page 24: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

20

Table 8.AL: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

HLT 4.8 4.6 7.7 4.7 5.4 12.5 5.4 HMS 16.8 12.8 21.0 21.6 28.4 69.0 20.1 HUM 4.4 7.4 8.0 6.2 31.5 615.9 11.5 ITA 24.9 25.6 20.0 11.5 21.4 -14.1 20.7 ITD 31.6 20.4 25.0 25.6 29.2 -7.6 26.4 ITE 105.0 111.0 137.7 155.0 161.0 53.3 133.9 ITN 50.4 46.6 52.5 73.5 70.9 40.7 58.8 ITP 43.3 46.5 57.5 54.1 58.7 35.6 52.0 JPN 40.4 42.7 40.8 47.2 45.5 12.6 43.3 LAT 7.8 6.6 9.6 7.2 8.2 5.1 7.9 LBR 0.9 0.9 --- 0.8 --- --- 0.9 LGL 78.2 74.2 71.4 80.8 101.8 30.2 81.3 MKT 21.2 20.4 21.6 24.4 20.0 -5.7 21.5 MTH 264.8 259.9 278.5 282.9 289.9 9.5 275.2 MUS 74.7 66.9 71.4 61.7 76.1 1.9 70.2 NAS 66.9 73.1 102.7 96.3 96.8 44.7 87.2 PED 75.9 88.2 87.3 103.2 126.5 66.7 96.2 PHI 39.8 42.5 40.3 43.9 58.4 46.7 45.0 PHT 80.6 74.8 78.7 77.9 83.9 4.1 79.2 PHY 70.7 72.5 74.3 65.5 65.3 -7.6 69.7 PLS 54.7 46.3 59.4 65.2 55.0 0.5 56.1 PSY 222.0 215.1 226.7 217.9 237.2 6.8 223.8 REA 30.5 16.7 10.3 4.7 12.6 -58.7 15.0 REL 35.6 23.3 22.1 17.3 26.6 -25.3 25.0 RUS 10.5 14.3 15.3 18.9 18.3 74.3 15.5 SDV 52.7 64.5 63.5 73.9 93.4 77.2 69.6 SOC 67.3 68.9 61.9 68.4 78.8 17.1 69.1 SPA 124.7 125.1 139.8 113.3 103.3 -17.2 121.2 SSC --- 0.4 0.3 --- --- --- 0.4 VTN 2.7 4.0 2.9 6.4 7.1 163.0 4.6 Campus 4,992.2 4,862.8 5,315.8 5,466.4 5,870.9

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available.

Page 25: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

21

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

ACC 214.0 202.4 248.4 225.2 233.4 9.1 224.7 ADJ 194.3 154.3 156.4 124.4 166.1 -14.5 159.1 ARA 41.5 37.9 34.1 28.9 38.3 -7.7 36.1 ARC 62.7 55.4 60.0 56.8 53.5 -14.7 57.7 ART 168.3 158.0 200.7 204.6 214.2 27.3 189.2 ASL 68.7 72.9 90.6 96.4 99.7 45.1 85.7 BIO 439.2 450.1 505.9 609.1 796.3 81.3 560.1 BUS 233.6 257.2 268.8 216.2 228.4 -2.2 240.8 CHI 19.7 14.8 23.1 14.3 20.4 3.6 18.5 CHM 110.1 133.7 128.3 162.6 184.3 67.4 143.8 CSC 82.1 85.2 89.7 88.0 104.6 27.4 89.9 CST* 261.4 268.8 315.4 338.2 295.4 13.0 295.8 DEVE** 419.3 467.0 530.6 540.2 577.4 37.7 506.9 DEVM*** 319.3 344.3 399.5 381.9 459.0 43.8 380.8 DIT 26.2 40.4 40.2 41.6 57.8 120.6 41.2 DRF 21.1 16.2 16.8 22.7 23.2 10.0 20.0 ECO 217.6 248.4 295.4 256.4 257.6 18.3 255.1 EDU --- --- --- 3.2 8.8 --- 6.0 EGR 54.8 64.7 68.2 88.3 119.3 117.7 79.1 ENG 702.3 717.5 797.4 820.1 943.7 34.4 796.2 ENV --- --- --- 2.2 5.2 --- 3.7 ESL 484.7 514.3 518.3 543.3 605.7 25.0 533.3 ETR 13.9 6.1 7.5 6.9 10.7 -23.0 9.0 FIN 18.4 16.6 15.8 14.8 18.4 0.0 16.8 FRE 40.3 36.5 37.5 33.4 45.3 12.4 38.6 FST 37.3 5.2 21.4 24.6 13.0 -65.1 20.3 GEO 11.0 11.0 8.6 6.8 7.8 -29.1 9.0 GER 19.7 19.9 23.5 17.2 20.7 5.1 20.2 GOL 49.7 62.9 60.5 58.1 76.7 54.3 61.6 HIM**** 0.2 --- --- --- --- --- 0.2 HIS 453.8 484.2 548.4 524.4 668.4 47.3 535.8 HRI 70.8 71.4 86.9 96.3 106.1 49.9 86.3 HUM 24.0 22.8 35.6 34.4 36.8 53.3 30.7 INT 7.2 15.4 14.6 20.6 23.4 225.0 16.2 ITD 22.4 19.6 23.4 25.6 28.2 25.9 23.8 ITE 225.4 281.4 302.4 317.3 331.4 47.0 291.6 ITN 94.5 68.7 47.0 63.6 66.6 -29.5 68.1 ITP 60.3 38.3 48.5 45.2 47.3 -21.6 47.9 KOR --- 11.7 17.0 14.7 12.7 --- 14.0 LBR 1.3 1.3 --- --- --- --- 1.3 MEC --- --- 4.8 --- 2.0 --- 3.4 MET 2.4 3.0 --- --- --- --- 2.7

Page 26: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

22

Table 8.AN: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

MKT 58.6 58.0 65.2 55.8 60.6 3.4 59.6 MSC --- --- 1.3 2.8 3.0 --- 2.4 MTH 621.5 665.3 695.0 765.8 870.5 40.1 723.6 MUS 79.1 81.7 88.5 87.6 101.5 28.3 87.7 NAS 240.3 259.7 255.7 229.6 241.3 0.4 245.3 PED 165.5 163.2 193.5 212.3 267.3 61.5 200.4 PHI 114.2 107.2 105.4 113.4 151.4 32.6 118.3 PHY 70.3 76.3 88.3 99.2 133.5 89.9 93.5 PLS 51.2 50.2 52.2 44.8 51.6 0.8 50.0 PSY 293.6 335.4 377.0 387.4 403.8 37.5 359.4 REA 73.1 41.6 20.8 7.2 2.9 -96.0 29.1 REL --- 14.8 16.8 12.6 14.0 --- 14.6 RPK 17.7 18.0 16.3 18.7 19.8 11.9 18.1 SDV 79.2 88.6 100.1 112.7 126.5 59.7 101.4 SOC 155.8 155.9 180.2 182.4 227.8 46.2 180.4 SPA 161.1 161.3 133.8 130.7 158.6 -1.6 149.1 TRV 39.1 30.9 39.7 29.3 30.6 -21.7 33.9 Campus 7,513.8 7,787.6 8,521.0 8,660.8 9,872.5

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math ****Formerly HIT --- Data not available.

Page 27: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

23

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

ACC 99.0 102.0 116.4 113.2 122.6 23.8 110.6 ARA 11.3 11.7 12.9 11.3 14.1 24.8 12.3 ART 161.6 153.3 155.7 153.5 160.9 -0.4 157.0 AST 2.2 3.1 3.4 --- 3.1 40.9 3.0 BIO 124.9 118.4 151.5 159.7 174.5 39.7 145.8 BUS 127.0 122.8 130.6 112.6 103.8 -18.3 119.4 CHD 28.0 36.2 30.8 45.2 39.8 42.1 36.0 CHM 53.2 64.5 74.9 79.7 81.8 53.8 70.8 CSC 35.9 39.4 38.5 39.7 37.4 4.2 38.2 CST* 95.2 107.2 89.8 120.8 129.8 36.3 108.6 DEVE** 170.5 173.7 188.6 218.5 241.9 41.9 198.6 DEVM*** 140.4 160.4 185.9 192.4 239.1 70.3 183.6 ECO 80.6 79.4 104.8 122.0 127.6 58.3 102.9 EDU --- --- 3.2 2.6 4.4 --- 3.4 ENG 269.3 263.0 303.9 339.8 381.1 41.5 311.4 ENV --- --- 5.4 5.6 2.8 --- 4.6 ESL 145.7 152.3 190.3 193.0 204.3 40.2 177.1 FIN 9.2 14.4 12.6 7.4 6.8 -26.1 10.1 FRE 11.1 4.3 10.2 8.9 8.3 -25.2 8.6 GEO 42.4 41.2 57.0 61.6 57.6 35.8 52.0 GER --- --- 6.0 6.0 9.9 --- 7.3 GIS 4.3 5.6 8.8 7.5 16.4 281.4 8.5 GOL 45.6 58.1 69.3 79.2 90.1 97.6 68.5 HIS 265.2 278.6 282.0 279.6 386.0 45.6 298.3 HLT --- 4.2 5.6 6.4 6.2 --- 5.6 HRT 40.8 34.9 39.7 33.9 37.3 -8.6 37.3 HUM 2.8 10.2 8.8 13.6 18.8 571.4 10.8 IDS 54.8 44.7 50.3 43.4 38.8 -29.2 46.4 ITA 9.7 10.2 8.0 9.7 11.8 21.6 9.9 ITD 8.2 2.6 6.4 6.8 6.6 -19.5 6.1 ITE 79.4 84.4 102.9 122.1 153.7 93.6 108.5 ITN 16.6 19.0 25.0 27.1 22.3 34.3 22.0 ITP 26.8 15.4 16.1 15.8 19.7 -26.5 18.8 MKT 14.4 14.8 18.6 15.4 16.0 11.1 15.8 MTH 227.4 247.8 277.6 302.5 370.7 63.0 285.2 MUS 58.9 52.1 48.8 48.5 57.6 -2.2 53.2 NAS 6.9 20.3 49.1 58.1 68.3 889.9 40.5 PED 48.8 52.9 49.0 62.9 72.5 48.6 57.2 PHI 17.6 11.4 14.6 16.0 28.6 62.5 17.6 PLS 24.4 24.6 28.6 30.0 32.6 33.6 28.0 PSY 150.6 148.0 162.0 184.4 205.4 36.4 170.1 REL 10.4 16.4 14.4 21.6 40.6 290.4 20.7

Page 28: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

24

Table 8.LO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

RUS --- --- --- --- 5.7 --- 5.7 SDV 21.3 26.0 31.2 34.6 31.5 47.9 28.9 SOC 53.8 51.8 63.6 57.6 81.6 51.7 61.7 SPA 60.6 63.1 69.5 61.9 68.9 13.7 64.8 VET 59.5 68.1 66.2 69.3 71.1 19.5 66.8 VTN --- --- 3.3 --- --- --- 3.3 Campus 2,916.3 3,012.5 3,391.8 3,601.4 4,110.4

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available.

Page 29: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

25

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

ACC 63.0 57.8 51.0 51.4 51.2 -18.7 54.9 ADJ 80.8 75.4 70.0 81.4 70.4 -12.9 75.6 ARA 7.3 5.3 6.7 4.7 9.5 30.1 6.7 ART 60.4 72.0 81.5 79.7 86.0 42.4 75.9 AUT 76.8 97.4 98.0 87.0 75.0 -2.3 86.8 BIO 117.3 124.9 133.6 171.7 199.2 69.8 149.3 BUS 74.2 66.0 64.4 66.6 47.6 -35.8 63.8 CHD 46.6 40.8 55.8 44.4 75.0 60.9 52.5 CHI --- --- --- 6.3 --- --- 6.3 CHM 38.9 30.1 38.1 43.8 43.1 10.8 38.8 CSC 22.6 19.3 21.1 26.2 24.3 7.5 22.7 CST* 96.0 91.8 110.4 96.2 92.6 -3.5 97.4 DEVE** 163.7 173.5 182.1 195.8 192.1 17.3 181.4 DEVM*** 114.9 125.9 152.5 140.8 150.9 31.3 137.0 DSL --- --- --- 5.7 6.1 --- 5.9 ECO 49.4 48.6 71.8 80.6 86.8 75.7 67.4 EDU 23.4 28.8 19.4 19.2 18.8 -19.7 21.9 EGR --- --- --- --- 1.2 --- 1.2 ENG 203.9 196.4 217.3 231.7 261.7 28.3 222.2 ENV 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.5 4.8 37.1 3.7 ESL 101.7 120.3 128.7 120.7 136.0 33.7 121.5 ETR --- --- --- --- 2.1 --- 2.1 FIN 5.4 2.8 7.6 6.2 7.6 40.7 5.9 FRE 8.9 9.3 9.1 7.7 10.1 13.5 9.0 GEO --- --- 5.8 6.0 5.4 --- 5.7 GOL 11.2 12.0 11.8 11.2 12.5 11.6 11.7 HIS 133.6 152.4 153.2 151.6 176.0 31.7 153.4 HLT 6.8 5.6 5.6 5.2 9.8 44.1 6.6 ITD 4.6 3.0 3.4 12.8 24.6 434.8 9.7 ITE 64.6 71.8 71.2 86.8 95.4 47.7 78.0 ITN 9.5 10.1 4.6 16.3 36.0 278.9 15.3 ITP 12.7 12.5 19.3 16.1 15.3 20.5 15.2 LBR --- 0.5 1.1 --- --- --- 0.8 MEC --- --- --- --- 3.2 --- 3.2 MKT --- --- 3.2 2.2 4.4 --- 3.3 MTH 169.5 158.9 184.9 170.1 201.9 19.1 177.1 MUS 0.7 0.9 6.4 6.7 11.4 1,528.6 5.2 NAS 14.1 6.7 12.3 18.1 21.9 55.3 14.6 PED 32.3 31.9 31.1 40.1 54.4 68.4 38.0 PHI 8.8 10.4 10.2 9.8 9.4 6.8 9.7 PHY 27.8 29.1 27.2 27.2 22.5 -19.1 26.8 PLS 16.2 14.4 15.4 20.0 16.4 1.2 16.5

Page 30: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

26

Table 8.MA: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

PSY 130.8 146.6 143.4 140.8 154.8 18.3 143.3 REL 10.4 10.8 7.8 6.4 11.6 11.5 9.4 SDV 29.3 36.8 39.5 48.0 46.2 57.7 40.0 SOC 27.6 30.8 37.2 31.0 39.6 43.5 33.2 SPA 42.0 56.7 64.5 59.6 63.1 50.2 57.2 WEL 22.7 23.9 11.1 7.8 12.1 -46.7 15.5 Campus 2,133.9 2,215.5 2,392.6 2,465.1 2,700.0

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available

Page 31: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

27

Table 8.ME: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Medical Education Campus

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

DMS --- --- --- 5.4 14.6 --- 10.0 DNH 69.9 73.7 86.7 80.1 71.2 1.9 76.3 EMS 92.8 85.3 99.7 103.7 107.7 16.1 97.8 HIM* 34.3 44.9 52.0 52.0 68.7 100.3 50.4 HLT 62.7 79.3 90.7 91.1 121.2 93.3 89.0 MDL 24.9 20.3 18.2 20.2 23.9 -4.0 21.5 NUR 213.2 225.6 309.2 353.3 282.1 32.3 276.7 PTH 50.7 48.5 50.9 54.1 55.2 8.9 51.9 RAD 75.8 88.1 96.1 101.1 99.4 31.1 92.1 ROC --- --- 2.1 7.1 3.7 --- 4.3 RTH 23.3 31.9 36.8 31.3 34.5 48.1 31.6 SDV 12.7 26.7 31.1 32.3 49.9 292.9 30.5 Campus 660.3 724.3 873.5 931.7 932.1

*Formerly HIT --- Data not available

Page 32: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

28

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

ACC 139.6 158.2 182.8 175.2 157.8 13.0 162.7 ADJ 83.0 95.5 100.2 88.4 110.6 33.3 95.5 AIR 74.5 71.5 78.1 86.9 93.3 25.2 80.9 ARA --- 5.0 6.3 5.3 --- --- 5.5 ART 84.5 73.5 94.1 95.8 113.5 34.3 92.3 AST 30.4 31.5 28.6 30.2 34.4 13.2 31.0 BIO 168.9 163.7 183.8 171.2 197.3 16.8 177.0 BUS 184.4 209.8 214.4 207.8 191.4 3.8 201.6 CHD --- --- --- --- 6.6 --- 6.6 CHM 25.1 26.1 26.7 32.0 34.1 35.9 28.8 CSC 24.2 22.2 23.7 18.8 23.5 -2.9 22.5 CST* 105.5 111.2 129.4 158.4 141.6 34.2 129.2 DEVE** 217.5 216.4 229.3 241.0 304.1 39.8 241.7 DEVM*** 123.7 137.5 152.1 150.0 152.3 23.1 143.1 ECO 47.0 66.0 74.6 73.6 80.6 71.5 68.4 EDU 0.5 --- --- --- 4.8 860.0 2.7 ENG 312.6 336.0 342.2 350.4 406.4 30.0 349.5 ESL 113.1 120.3 135.7 139.3 148.0 30.9 131.3 ETR 17.6 --- 13.2 7.3 21.3 21.0 14.9 FIN 13.0 10.8 15.0 15.4 16.6 27.7 14.2 FRE 8.1 7.1 9.7 6.0 9.7 19.8 8.1 GEO 10.8 7.8 6.8 6.6 9.2 -14.8 8.2 GER 17.5 16.5 19.2 23.3 20.1 14.9 19.3 GOL 12.3 20.3 21.9 20.4 18.9 53.7 18.8 HIS 204.6 229.4 266.4 259.2 274.2 34.0 246.8 HLT 13.5 11.1 12.9 14.1 12.8 -5.2 12.9 HUM 20.8 18.6 15.6 21.8 22.8 9.6 19.9 ITD 17.0 36.2 46.2 25.6 34.6 103.5 31.9 ITE 138.7 179.9 189.1 187.9 236.5 70.5 186.4 ITN 47.9 74.7 73.9 59.2 58.8 22.8 62.9 ITP 38.3 45.9 46.7 47.5 54.3 41.8 46.5 LBR --- --- --- 1.4 0.3 --- 0.9 MEC 10.0 4.4 7.3 4.0 9.7 -3.0 7.1 MKT 10.8 13.2 17.2 14.6 13.4 24.1 13.8 MTH 177.8 167.5 179.7 180.6 207.6 16.8 182.6 MUS 7.7 8.3 7.2 6.5 7.5 -2.6 7.4 NAS 66.1 69.1 71.7 58.1 74.4 12.6 67.9 PBS 5.2 6.0 7.6 5.0 3.0 -42.3 5.4 PED 39.9 36.9 43.5 43.8 53.9 35.1 43.6 PHI 9.8 5.4 11.4 9.2 14.0 42.9 10.0 PHT 28.2 26.0 24.8 28.4 37.6 33.3 29.0 PHY 27.7 19.2 21.9 18.4 28.8 4.0 23.2

Page 33: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

29

Table 8.WO: Fall Semester FTES by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Fall 2005

FTES Fall 2006

FTES Fall 2007

FTES Fall 2008

FTES Fall 2009

% Change (Fall 05 - Fall 09)

Average

PLS 9.8 8.8 15.6 17.2 3.0 -69.4 10.9 PSY 138.2 152.6 179.0 172.8 187.4 35.6 166.0 REA 22.7 12.3 6.9 5.1 1.6 -93.0 9.7 REL 18.6 21.4 20.0 15.4 24.0 29.0 19.9 SDV 35.7 40.4 43.9 50.0 60.2 68.6 46.0 SOC 56.4 61.4 82.2 94.6 120.8 114.2 83.1 SPA 126.2 125.6 129.6 140.4 121.0 -4.1 128.6 Campus 3,085.4 3,281.2 3,608.1 3,584.1 3,958.3

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Data not available.

Page 34: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

30

Tables 9.AL through 9.WO give the teaching credit hours (TCH) by campus and discipline. The tables show full-time and part-time faculty teaching credit hours and total faculty teaching credit hours (the sum of full- and part-time TCH) and the proportion of total teaching credit hours taught by part-time faculty. The tables are sorted from highest to lowest according to the part-time proportion. The data shown in this table was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester.

Table 9.AL: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours

PT Proportion

ADJ 0 24 24 100.0 CHI 0 25 25 100.0 CIV 0 9 9 100.0 EDU 0 6 6 100.0 EGR 0 16 16 100.0 GEO 0 18 18 100.0 GER 0 5 5 100.0 GRE 0 6 6 100.0 HIN 0 5 5 100.0 HMS 0 18 18 100.0 ITA 0 18 18 100.0 REA 0 11 11 100.0 RUS 0 18 18 100.0 SDV 0 57 57 100.0 VTN 0 8 8 100.0 CSC 3 28 31 90.3 ECO 15 66 81 81.5 PSY 30 117 147 79.6 DRF 8 31 39 79.5 LGL 16 54 70 77.1 MKT 3 9 12 75.0 GOL 12 25 37 67.6 PHI 12 24 36 66.7 PED 25 48 73 65.8 BIO 82 148 230 64.4 JPN 15 27 42 64.3 SPA 31 55 86 64.0 ARA 15 25 40 62.5 AST 9 15 24 62.5

Page 35: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

31

Table 9.AL: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours

PT Proportion

HIS 82 117 199 58.8 HLT 3 4 7 57.1 NAS 24 32 56 57.1 PLS 21 24 45 53.3 DEVE* 89 101 190 53.2 ENG 159 180 339 53.1 CHD 27 30 57 52.6 CST** 66 69 135 51.1 ESL 221 229 450 50.9 FIN 3 3 6 50.0 LAT 6 6 12 50.0 PHT 45 43 88 48.9 ITN 39 35 74 47.3 DEVM*** 49 43 92 46.7 ART 131 99 230 43.0 CHM 51 35 86 40.7 ARC 18 12 30 40.0 AUB 12 8 20 40.0 PHY 27 17 44 38.6 ITD 15 9 24 37.5 REL 15 9 24 37.5 BLD 14 8 22 36.4 MUS 61 34 95 35.8 SOC 33 18 51 35.3 MTH 103 56 159 35.2 ITP 44 18 62 29.0 BUS 78 30 108 27.8 ITE 87 27 114 23.7 FRE 49 13 62 21.0 ACC 90 21 111 18.9 AUT 72 16 88 18.2 HUM 25 5 30 16.7 CON 21 0 21 0.0

Campus 2,056 2,267 4,323 52.4 *Developmental English **Formerly SPD ***Developmental Math

Page 36: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

32

Table 9.AN: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Annandale

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ARA 0 31 31 100.0 FIN 0 18 18 100.0 FRE 0 34 34 100.0 GEO 0 6 6 100.0 GER 0 13 13 100.0 KOR 0 10 10 100.0 MSC 0 3 3 100.0 REL 0 9 9 100.0 SDV 0 50 50 100.0 ASL 19 62 81 76.5 DIT 6 18 24 75.0 MKT 12 27 39 69.2 DEVE* 150 243 393 61.8 BIO 145 232 377 61.5 PED 54 83 137 60.6 NAS 60 84 144 58.3 SOC 48 60 108 55.6 HIS 126 141 267 52.8 HRI 40 42 82 51.2 ENG 339 348 687 50.7 EDU 3 3 6 50.0 DEVM** 115 112 227 49.3 TRV 21 20 41 48.8 PHI 39 36 75 48.0 SPA 60 55 115 47.8 CHI 10 9 19 47.4 BUS 75 66 141 46.8 ECO 75 60 135 44.4 PHY 45 35 80 43.8 ART 133 101 234 43.2 ITD 12 9 21 42.9 ESL 260 185 445 41.6 ITE 129 87 216 40.3 CHM 77 49 126 38.9 PSY 93 54 147 36.7 MTH 308 154 462 33.3

Page 37: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

33

Table 9.AN: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Campus = Annandale

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ADJ 72 35 107 32.7 ACC 84 39 123 31.7 DRF 16 7 23 30.4 CST*** 132 57 189 30.2 PLS 21 9 30 30.0 ITN 36 15 51 29.4 ARC 39 16 55 29.1 ITP 30 11 41 26.8 HUM 9 3 12 25.0 INT 18 6 24 25.0 CSC 54 17 71 23.9 GOL 27 8 35 22.9 MUS 99 21 120 17.5 EGR 84 11 95 11.6 RPK 29 2 31 6.5 ENV 3 0 3 0.0 ETR 12 0 12 0.0 FST 15 0 15 0.0 MEC 3 0 3 0.0 REA 4 0 4 0.0

Campus 3,241 2,806 6,047 46.4 *Developmental English **Developmental Math ***Formerly SPD

Page 38: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

34

Table 9.LO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ARA 0 8 8 100.0 AST 0 4 4 100.0 FIN 0 9 9 100.0 FRE 0 5 5 100.0 GER 0 8 8 100.0 HUM 0 12 12 100.0 ITA 0 8 8 100.0 PHI 0 12 12 100.0 PLS 0 21 21 100.0 REL 0 24 24 100.0 RUS 0 5 5 100.0 SDV 1 20 21 95.2 CSC 5 21 26 80.8 MKT 3 9 12 75.0 CST* 30 69 99 69.7 SOC 15 27 42 64.3 ITE 35 61 96 63.5 ENG 93 162 255 63.5 ART 68 105 173 60.7 GEO 15 21 36 58.3 DEVM** 63 84 147 57.1 PSY 51 66 117 56.4 PED 19 24 43 55.8 HIS 81 102 183 55.7 BIO 35 44 79 55.7 ITP 9 11 20 55.0 ESL 70 85 155 54.8 BUS 30 36 66 54.6 ECO 30 36 66 54.6 DEVE*** 82 98 180 54.4 ACC 36 42 78 53.9 GOL 24 28 52 53.9 SPA 21 23 44 52.3 CHD 25 27 52 51.9 EDU 3 3 6 50.0

Page 39: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

35

Table 9.LO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ITD 3 3 6 50.0 NAS 20 20 40 50.0 GIS 9 8 17 47.1 MTH 127 102 229 44.5 ITN 9 7 16 43.8 MUS 67 41 108 38.0 CHM 37 14 51 27.5 IDS 27 9 36 25.0 HRT 34 5 39 12.8 VET 54 3 57 5.3 ENV 3 0 3 0.0 HLT 3 0 3 0.0

Campus 1,237 1,532 2,769 55.3 *Formerly SPD **Developmental Math *** Developmental English

Page 40: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

36

Table 9.MA: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Manassas

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ARA 0 8 8 100.0 EGR 0 2 2 100.0 ENV 0 8 8 100.0 ETR 0 8 8 100.0 FRE 0 8 8 100.0 GEO 0 3 3 100.0 GOL 0 8 8 100.0 ITD 0 18 18 100.0 MKT 0 3 3 100.0 MUS 0 8 8 100.0 PHI 0 3 3 100.0 REL 0 6 6 100.0 SDV 1 18 19 94.7 PED 6 26 32 81.3 ITN 11 36 47 76.6 ADJ 18 48 66 72.7 ECO 12 24 36 66.7 EDU 6 9 15 60.0 ITP 4 6 10 60.0 PSY 39 57 96 59.4 DEVE* 61 89 150 59.3 BUS 15 21 36 58.3 ESL 50 65 115 56.5 ENG 81 94 175 53.7 SPA 23 26 49 53.1 BIO 51 56 107 52.3 CHM 21 23 44 52.3 ACC 18 18 36 50.0 CST** 27 27 54 50.0 PLS 9 9 18 50.0 SOC 9 9 18 50.0 DEVM*** 56 54 110 49.1 AUT 46 43 89 48.3 MTH 73 65 138 47.1 ITE 36 29 65 44.6 NAS 8 4 12 33.3 HIS 60 27 87 31.0

Page 41: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

37

Table 9.MA: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Campus = Manassas

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

CHD 45 15 60 25.0 ART 55 17 72 23.6 PHY 16 3 19 15.8 CSC 18 0 18 0.0 DSL 8 0 8 0.0 FIN 6 0 6 0.0 HLT 6 0 6 0.0 MEC 4 0 4 0.0 WEL 13 0 13 0.0

Campus 912 1,001 1,913 52.3 *Developmental English **Formerly SPD ***Developmental Math

Page 42: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

38

Table 9.ME: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Medical Education

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

SDV 5 24 29 82.8 HLT 32 43 75 57.3 HIM* 30 22 52 42.3 PTH 14 10 24 41.7 MDL 16 9 25 36.0 RTH 25 12 37 32.4 EMS 71 34 105 32.4 ROC 9 2 11 18.2 DNH 28 5 33 15.2 NUR 98 5 103 4.9 DMS 23 0 23 0.0 RAD 62 0 62 0.0

Campus 413 166 579 28.7 *Formerly HIT

Page 43: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

39

Table 9.WO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

CHD 0 9 9 100.0 CSC 0 14 14 100.0 FRE 0 10 10 100.0 GEO 0 6 6 100.0 GER 0 53 53 100.0 LBR 0 1 1 100.0 MUS 0 23 23 100.0 PHI 0 6 6 100.0 PLS 0 3 3 100.0 REA 0 4 4 100.0 REL 0 21 21 100.0 SDV 0 36 36 100.0 BIO 24 64 88 72.7 BUS 48 117 165 70.9 ITP 23 53 76 69.7 ADJ 30 63 93 67.7 ART 27 56 83 67.5 ECO 15 30 45 66.7 ENG 96 192 288 66.7 ITD 12 24 36 66.7 PED 13 21 34 61.8 MKT 6 9 15 60.0 SOC 24 33 57 57.9 HLT 6 8 14 57.1 HUM 9 12 21 57.1 SPA 48 61 109 56.0 ITE 87 108 195 55.4 CST* 54 66 120 55.0 HIS 57 60 117 51.3 CHM 12 12 24 50.0 PHT 21 21 42 50.0 PHY 8 8 16 50.0 DEVE** 106 100 206 48.5 ITN 58 50 108 46.3 PSY 54 45 99 45.5 DEVM*** 65 54 119 45.4

Page 44: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

40

Table 9.WO: Part-Time Faculty Proportion of Total Teaching Credit Hours (TCH) by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FT TCH

PT TCH

Total Teaching

Credit Hours PT Proportion

ACC 81 66 147 44.9 AIR 46 33 79 41.8 NAS 20 12 32 37.5 ESL 115 35 150 23.3 FIN 12 3 15 20.0 MTH 101 24 125 19.2 AST 66 0 66 0.0 EDU 3 0 3 0.0 ETR 11 0 11 0.0 GOL 12 0 12 0.0 MEC 5 0 5 0.0 PBS 9 0 9 0.0

Campus 1,384 1,626 3,010 54.0 *Formerly SPD ** Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Page 45: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

41

Tables 10.AL through 10.WO provide discipline productivity information for each campus for five years. Discipline productivity is expressed as a percentage and is computed by dividing the actual discipline semester ratio of FTES to FTEF by the current funded ratio. Beginning in Fall 2005, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model was used to calculate this data. In Fall 2006, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) was revised. Due to this revision, the efficiency factor for NOVA was changed from 1.17 in Fall 2005 to 1.103 in Fall 2006. For Fall 2008 and Fall 2009, adjunct faculty FTEF was calculated according to load. In prior years, FTEF figures came from the “Discipline Performance Statistics Report” produced by the Information Technology department. The FTEF data from this report derived FTEF from faculty load. For Fall 2005, productivity data for the English and Math disciplines are unavailable. Human Resources was unable to provide data that accurately reflect how FTEF for faculty teaching in these disciplines is split between English/Developmental English and Math/Developmental Math. As the developmental components of these two disciplines have different funded ratios from the non-developmental components, information concerning how the FTEF is subdivided is paramount to the calculation of productivity.

Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ACC 157 121 108 115 115 0 ACQ 55 59 34 --- --- --- ADJ 64 53 55 83 79 -4 ARA 86 54 54 72 56 -16 ARC 176 161 161 170 197 27 ART 79 68 73 69 71 2 AST 72 37 45 66 12 -54 AUB 102 75 87 72 62 -10 AUT 108 90 90 89 90 1 BIO 112 143 99 100 106 6 BLD 177 104 123 148 111 -37 BUS 87 95 86 87 94 7 CHD 89 90 91 100 119 19 CHI 74 59 54 30 42 12 CHM 121 129 90 99 101 2 CIV 118 140 110 130 125 -5 CON --- 25 71 58 115 57 CSC 127 64 69 80 79 -1 CST† 83 75 71 77 72 -5 DEVE*** --- 114 122 117 107 -10 DEVM**** --- 126 137 128 132 4 DRF 113 96 101 112 98 -14 ECO 68 72 87 89 100 11 EDU --- 64 94 47 76 29 EGR 155 91 104 101 122 21 ENG --- 99 80 78 75 -3 ESL 97 97 90 94 84 -10

Page 46: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

42

Table 10.AL: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ETR --- 7 --- --- --- --- FIN --- 101 37 58 53 -5 FRE 73 45 37 37 61 24 GEO 63 41 57 82 62 -20 GER 56 36 45 63 86 23 GOL 138 118 91 90 92 2 GRE --- 53 24 35 48 13 HIN --- --- --- 55 26 -29 HIS 104 88 106 93 96 3 HLT --- 209 259 85 105 20 HMS 72 40 88 60 119 59 HUM --- 70 76 47 59 12 ITA 79 71 56 53 90 37 ITD 75 51 48 72 92 20 ITE 96 102 96 115 107 -8 ITN 82 54 39 61 72 11 ITP 71 58 52 58 72 14 JPN 106 95 81 85 82 -3 LAT 185 83 81 60 52 -8 LBR --- 62 --- 40 --- --- LGL 98 93 90 92 110 18 MKT 72 85 109 123 126 3 MTH --- 112 101 98 103 5 MUS 79 46 51 46 61 15 NAS --- 178 178 169 168 -1 PED 59 88 90 91 98 7 PHI 51 65 67 72 92 20 PHT 78 78 67 80 72 -8 PHY 116 111 86 82 84 2 PLS 122 71 69 67 69 2 PSY 107 77 72 76 91 15 REA 145 84 71 30 87 57 REL 90 53 40 34 63 29 RUS 100 136 145 190 77 -113 SDV --- 70 106 112 93 -19 SOC 86 69 95 83 88 5 SPA 80 72 76 88 91 3 SSC --- 6 16 --- --- --- VTN 43 61 28 64 67 3

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math † Formerly SPD --- Data not available

Page 47: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

43

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ACC 154 121 142 145 143 -2 ADJ 144 75 92 87 117 30 ARA 104 92 89 86 93 7 ARC 142 171 146 108 94 -14 ART 97 62 68 70 69 -1 ASL 96 82 83 90 93 3 BIO 111 161 119 125 120 -5 BUS 181 127 144 109 122 13 CHI 156 74 80 60 81 21 CHM 102 105 77 83 83 0 CSC 111 96 81 83 83 0 CST† 95 85 89 88 89 1 DEVE*** --- 110 116 107 111 4 DEVM**** --- 152 161 142 153 11 DIT 160 306 364 314 328 14 DRF --- 113 136 105 98 -7 ECO 194 146 147 135 131 -4 EDU --- --- --- 81 111 30 EGR 129 76 91 97 122 25 ENG --- 87 74 76 78 2 ENV --- --- --- 71 168 97 ESL 92 105 89 87 88 1 ETR 46 54 92 56 87 31 FIN --- 83 80 75 77 2 FRE 101 89 123 89 101 12 FST 136 65 77 103 65 -38 GEO 98 69 81 64 74 10 GER 78 83 85 79 120 41 GOL 107 132 80 84 124 40 HIS 165 134 140 130 130 0 HRI 93 98 103 99 98 -1 HUM --- 143 168 162 174 12 INT --- 77 74 65 74 9 ITD 88 62 74 81 101 20 ITE 110 108 110 119 116 -3 ITN 136 71 91 87 99 12 ITP 92 55 75 88 87 -1 KOR --- 88 128 106 96 -10 LBR --- 91 --- --- --- --- MEC --- --- 78 --- 65 --- MET 11 8 --- --- --- --- MKT 99 63 103 108 117 9 MSC --- --- 70 106 57 -49 MTH --- 104 94 98 107 9 MUS 85 51 65 63 64 1 NAS --- 218 194 175 163 -12 PED 74 107 113 111 111 0 PHI 116 69 66 82 114 32

Page 48: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

44

Table 10.AN: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

PHY 88 113 85 87 95 8 PLS 114 95 110 106 97 -9 PSY 157 185 166 159 156 -3 REA 192 105 54 73 55 -18 REL --- 93 79 59 88 29 RPK 84 44 39 47 48 1 SDV --- 143 142 147 143 -4 SOC 109 87 97 117 120 3 SPA 99 101 104 98 104 6 TRV 62 36 61 49 56 7

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math † Formerly SPD --- Data not available

Page 49: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

45

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ACC 112 142 127 124 119 -5 ARA 107 111 123 114 133 19 ART 81 71 62 68 70 2 AST 52 58 63 --- 59 --- BIO 110 171 126 140 125 -15 BUS 128 134 132 142 119 -23 CHD 95 83 86 76 58 -18 CHM 93 121 94 104 91 -13 CSC 106 114 73 75 82 7 CST† 94 84 77 104 74 -30 DEVE*** --- 105 109 107 102 -5 DEVM**** --- 138 130 126 123 -3 ECO 96 94 90 105 110 5 EDU --- --- 81 65 55 -10 ENG --- 79 75 86 85 -1 ENV --- --- 175 181 91 -90 ESL 95 100 88 99 85 -14 FIN --- 90 106 93 57 -36 FRE 105 66 97 --- 125 --- GEO 151 60 67 68 91 23 GER --- --- 92 101 93 -8 GIS --- 53 48 47 73 26 GOL 98 109 75 85 98 13 HIS 133 110 104 108 120 12 HLT --- 191 254 290 281 -9 HRT 104 100 99 84 93 9 HUM --- 27 33 64 89 25 IDS 90 78 95 75 81 6 ITA 153 97 122 98 111 13 ITD 97 65 81 86 83 -3 ITE 108 112 113 121 121 0 ITN 79 48 52 47 105 58 ITP 79 83 87 159 74 -85 MKT --- 124 156 129 101 -28 MTH --- 108 84 90 92 2 MUS 121 34 32 30 40 10 NAS 140 165 132 209 166 -43 PED 62 88 87 140 96 -44 PHI 89 108 92 101 135 34 PLS 54 155 108 94 88 -6 PSY 161 146 96 94 99 5 REL 62 103 54 68 96 28 RUS --- --- --- --- 86 --- SDV --- 113 110 119 85 -34 SOC 128 109 133 121 110 -11

Page 50: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

46

Table 10.LO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

SPA 131 122 119 108 118 10 VET 95 130 191 165 170 5 VTN --- --- 50 --- --- ---

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math † Formerly SPD --- Data not available

Page 51: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

47

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ACC 107 112 117 108 107 -1 ADJ 101 111 98 93 81 -12 ARA 115 81 102 79 90 11 ART 110 85 82 80 90 10 AUT 86 133 120 108 82 -26 BIO 90 107 95 98 105 7 BUS 126 118 135 129 100 -29 CHD 69 68 88 75 94 19 CHI --- --- --- 45 --- --- CHM 97 71 59 61 56 -5 CSC 119 104 86 71 76 5 CST† 78 82 74 76 97 21 DEVE*** --- 94 92 112 97 -15 DEVM**** --- 120 123 107 104 -3 DSL --- --- --- 74 74 0 ECO 103 115 136 127 137 10 EDU 69 90 98 81 95 14 EGR --- --- --- --- 58 --- ENG --- 98 89 92 85 -7 ENV --- 80 79 76 58 -18 ESL 91 91 88 71 77 6 ETR --- --- --- --- 25 --- FIN --- 70 96 52 96 44 FRE 84 88 86 78 95 17 GEO --- --- 110 113 102 -11 GOL 88 114 74 85 89 4 HIS 95 106 121 119 115 -4 HLT --- 255 254 236 222 -14 ITD 73 75 86 81 103 22 ITE 128 113 112 109 111 2 ITN 56 76 116 48 58 10 ITP 67 86 105 90 116 26 LBR --- 38 79 --- --- --- MEC --- --- --- --- 78 --- MKT --- --- 81 --- 111 --- MTH --- 102 86 87 83 -4 MUS 33 62 119 112 108 -4 NAS --- 160 148 195 177 -18 PED 77 106 104 101 96 -5 PHI 104 196 193 185 178 -7 PHY 110 95 77 73 67 -6 PLS --- 91 97 76 52 -24

Page 52: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

48

Table 10.MA: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

PSY 116 123 108 95 91 -4 REL 93 102 74 60 110 50 SDV --- 149 160 139 138 -1 SOC 123 194 141 98 125 27 SPA 105 115 102 97 97 0 WEL 149 139 84 101 90 -11

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math † Formerly SPD --- Data not available

Page 53: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

49

Table 10.ME: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Medical Education

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

DMS --- --- --- 82 87 5 DNH 58 233 203 234 293 59 EMS 120 134 146 142 139 -3 HIM*** 127 161 133 131 180 49 HLT --- 190 209 212 220 8 MDL 79 89 99 96 130 34 NUR 63 385 337 395 372 -23 PTH 108 275 288 307 313 6 RAD 162 215 184 229 218 -11 ROC --- --- 71 92 46 -46 RTH 37 124 93 114 127 13 SDV --- 101 110 111 98 -13

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Formerly HIT --- Data not available

Page 54: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

50

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

ACC 132 74 85 80 81 1 ADJ 94 81 82 78 90 12 AIR 80 106 95 108 115 7 ARA --- 47 47 89 --- --- ART 79 77 79 95 103 8 AST 103 28 25 29 39 10 BIO 96 162 130 150 127 -23 BUS 102 81 87 82 88 6 CHD --- --- --- --- 55 --- CHM 92 123 94 93 81 -12 CSC --- 99 79 71 95 24 CST† 85 68 66 77 67 -10 DEVE*** --- 89 105 111 112 1 DEVM**** --- 108 106 108 97 -11 ECO 93 84 108 107 101 -6 EDU --- --- --- --- 121 --- ENG --- 73 74 79 80 1 ESL 80 70 68 69 64 -5 ETR --- --- 117 68 188 120 FIN --- 39 76 78 84 6 FRE 77 26 35 101 73 -28 GEO 96 74 64 62 87 25 GER 92 59 27 34 29 -5 GOL 58 117 89 70 89 19 HIS 117 124 136 126 133 7 HLT --- 168 134 142 124 -18 HUM 185 58 49 69 62 -7 ITD 62 61 65 50 73 23 ITE 140 95 98 87 92 5 ITN 63 50 43 44 41 -3 ITP 96 43 46 45 54 9 LBR --- --- --- 71 23 -48 MEC --- 65 118 52 188 136 MKT 85 111 87 92 67 -25 MTH --- 85 72 78 94 16 MUS 91 25 22 19 25 6 NAS 149 169 174 235 226 -9 PBS 123 10 13 21 25 4 PED 68 95 91 92 90 -2 PHI 116 102 72 174 132 -42 PHT 67 50 52 55 68 13 PHY 82 85 78 70 102 32 PLS 87 83 98 65 57 -8 PSY 134 119 106 99 107 8

Page 55: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

51

Table 10.WO: Productivity by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline Productivity Fall 2005*

Productivity Fall 2006**

Productivity Fall 2007**

Productivity Fall 2008**

Productivity Fall 2009**

Change (Fall 08-09)

REA --- 84 43 43 30 -13 REL 110 50 47 36 65 29 SDV --- 79 78 94 95 1 SOC 112 97 119 128 120 -8 SPA 109 101 77 86 84 -2

*Productivity based on 117% efficiency **Productivity based on 110% efficiency ***Developmental English ****Developmental Math † Formerly SPD --- Data not available

Page 56: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

52

Tables 11.AL through 11.ELI show, by campus (including ELI) and discipline, student credit hours generated, the discipline ratio, and the discipline multiple. The discipline multiple is computed by multiplying the credit hours by the ratio. The credits and the multiples are summed for each campus. The programmatic mix for the campus is calculated by dividing the total of the discipline multiples by the total of the discipline credit hours.

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 2,397 19.9 47,700.3 --- ADJ 345 19.9 6865.5 --- ARA 535 19.9 10,646.5 --- ARC 671 15.4 10333.4 --- ART 2,853 19.9 56,774.7 --- AST 588 19.9 11,701.2 --- AUB 184 15.4 2,833.6 --- AUT 1,652 15.4 25,440.8 --- BIO 4,772 26.5 126,458.0 --- BLD 515 15.4 7,931.0 --- BUS 2,175 19.9 43,282.5 --- CHD 1,311 19.9 26,088.9 --- CHI 98 19.9 1,950.2 --- CHM 1,973 26.5 52,284.5 --- CIV 180 15.4 2,772.0 --- CON 207 19.9 4,119.3 --- CSC 606 26.5 16,059.0 --- CST* 2,328 26.5 61,692.0 --- DEVE** 3,876 19.9 77,132.4 --- DEVM*** 2,358 19.9 46,924.2 --- DRF 545 15.4 8,393.0 --- ECO 1,662 26.5 44,043.0 --- EDU 97 19.9 1,930.3 --- EGR 211 15.4 3,249.4 --- ENG 6,248 26.5 165,572.0 --- ESL 9,599 23.2 222,696.8 --- FIN 191 19.9 3,800.9 --- FRE 521 19.9 10,367.9 --- GEO 324 26.5 8,586.0 --- GER 95 19.9 1,890.5 --- GOL 857 26.5 22,710.5 --- GRE 42 19.9 835.8 --- HIN 50 19.9 995.0 --- HIS 4,485 26.5 118,852.5 --- HLT 70 11 770 --- HMS 324 19.9 6,447.6 --- HUM 93 26.5 2,464.5 --- ITA 173 19.9 3,442.7 --- ITD 384 19.9 7,641.6 --- ITE 2,325 19.9 46,267.5 --- ITN 1,103 19.9 21,949.7 --- ITP 811 19.9 16,138.9 ---

Page 57: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

53

Table 11.AL: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix JPN 708 19.9 14,089.2 --- LAT 108 19.9 2,149.2 --- LBR 12 19.9 238.8 --- LGL 1,212 19.9 24,118.8 --- MKT 366 19.9 7,283.4 --- MTH 4,244 26.5 112,466.0 --- MUS 926 19.9 18,427.4 --- NAS 1,444 15.4 22,237.6 --- PED 1,548 26.5 41,022.0 --- PHI 658 26.5 17,437.0 --- PHT 1,169 19.9 23,263.1 --- PHY 983 26.5 26,049.5 --- PLS 978 26.5 25,917.0 --- PSY 3,268 26.5 86,602.0 --- REA 70 19.9 1,393.0 --- REL 260 26.5 6,890.0 --- RUS 284 19.9 5,651.6 --- SDV 1,108 26.5 29,362.0 --- SOC 1,026 26.5 27,189.0 --- SPA 1,700 19.9 33,830.0 --- VTN 96 19.9 1,910.4 --- Campus 82,002 1,885,563.1 22.9

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Not applicable

Page 58: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

54

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Annandale Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 3,378 19.9 67,222.2 --- ADJ 1,866 19.9 37,133.4 --- ARA 433 19.9 8,616.7 --- ARC 852 15.4 13,120.8 --- ART 3,069 19.9 61,073.1 --- ASL 1,446 19.9 28,775.4 --- BIO 9,136 26.5 242,104.0 --- BUS 3,243 19.9 64,535.7 --- CHI 214 19.9 4,258.6 --- CHM 2,439 26.5 64,633.5 --- CSC 1,320 26.5 34,980.0 --- CST* 5,073 26.5 134,434.5 --- DEVE** 8,103 19.9 161,249.7 --- DEVM*** 5,728 19.9 113,987.2 --- DIT 624 11 6,864.0 --- DRF 340 15.4 5,236.0 --- ECO 3,846 26.5 101,919.0 --- EDU 48 19.9 955.2 --- EGR 1,324 15.4 20,389.6 --- ENG 12,302 26.5 326,003.0 --- ENV 33 15.4 508.2 --- ESL 8,150 23.2 189,080.0 --- ETR 104 15.4 1,601.6 --- FIN 222 19.9 4,417.8 --- FRE 501 19.9 9,969.9 --- FST 369 19.9 7,343.1 --- GEO 102 26.5 2,703.0 --- GER 258 19.9 5,134.2 --- GOL 871 26.5 23,081.5 --- HIS 7,866 26.5 208,449.0 --- HRI 1,444 19.9 28,735.6 --- HUM 516 26.5 13,674.0 --- INT 309 19.9 6,149.1 --- ITD 384 19.9 7,641.6 --- ITE 4,759 19.9 94,704.1 --- ITN 954 19.9 18,984.6 --- ITP 678 19.9 13,492.2 --- KOR 220 19.9 4,378.0 --- MKT 837 19.9 16,656.3 ---

Page 59: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

55

Table 11.AN: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix MSC 42 26.5 1,113.0 --- MTH 11,487 26.5 304,405.5 --- MUS 1,314 19.9 26,148.6 --- NAS 3,444 15.4 53,037.6 --- PED 3,184 26.5 84,376.0 --- PHI 1,701 26.5 45,076.5 --- PHY 1,488 26.5 39,432.0 --- PLS 672 26.5 17,808.0 --- PSY 5,811 26.5 153,991.5 --- REA 108 19.9 2,149.2 --- REL 189 26.5 5,008.5 --- RPK 281 19.9 5,591.9 --- SDV 1,691 26.5 44,811.5 --- SOC 2,736 26.5 72,504.0 --- SPA 1,960 19.9 39,004.0 --- TRV 439 19.9 8,736.1 --- Campus 129,908 3,057,389.3 23.5

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Not applicable

Page 60: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

56

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 1,698 19.9 33,790.2 --- ARA 169 19.9 3,363.1 --- ART 2,302 19.9 45,809.8 --- BIO 2,396 26.5 63,494.0 --- BUS 1,689 19.9 33,611.1 --- CHD 678 19.9 13,492.2 --- CHM 1,195 26.5 31,667.5 --- CSC 596 26.5 15,794.0 --- CST* 1,812 26.5 48,018.0 --- DEVE** 3,277 19.9 65,212.3 --- DEVM*** 2,886 19.9 57,431.4 --- ECO 1,830 26.5 48,495.0 --- EDU 39 19.9 776.1 --- ENG 5,097 26.5 135,070.5 --- ENV 84 15.4 1,293.6 --- ESL 2,895 23.2 67,164.0 --- FIN 111 19.9 2,208.9 --- FRE 134 19.9 2,666.6 --- GEO 924 26.5 24,486.0 --- GER 90 19.9 1,791.0 --- GIS 112 19.9 2,228.8 --- GOL 1,188 26.5 31,482.0 --- HIS 4,194 26.5 111,141.0 --- HLT 96 11 1,056.0 --- HRT 508 15.4 7,823.2 --- HUM 204 26.5 5,406.0 --- IDS 651 19.9 12,954.9 --- ITA 145 19.9 2,885.5 --- ITD 102 19.9 2,029.8 --- ITE 1,831 19.9 36,436.9 --- ITN 407 19.9 8,099.3 --- ITP 237 19.9 4,716.3 --- MKT 231 19.9 4,596.9 --- MTH 4,538 26.5 120,257.0 --- MUS 728 19.9 14,487.2 --- NAS 872 15.4 13,428.8 --- PED 943 26.5 24,989.5 --- PHI 240 26.5 6,360.0 --- PLS 450 26.5 11,925.0 --- PSY 2,766 26.5 73,299.0 --- REL 324 26.5 8,586.0 --- SDV 519 26.5 13,753.5 --- SOC 864 26.5 22,896.0 --- SPA 928 19.9 18,467.2 ---

Page 61: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

57

Table 11.LO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Loudoun Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix VET 1,040 11 11,440.0 --- Campus 54,020 1,266,381.1 23.4

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Not applicable

Page 62: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

58

Table 11.MA: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Manassas Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 771 19.9 15,342.9 --- ADJ 1,221 19.9 24,297.9 --- ARA 70 19.9 1,393.0 --- ART 1,195 19.9 23,780.5 --- AUT 1,305 15.4 20,097.0 --- BIO 2,576 26.5 68,264.0 --- BUS 999 19.9 19,880.1 --- CHD 666 19.9 13,253.4 --- CHI 95 19.9 1,890.5 --- CHM 657 26.5 17,410.5 --- CSC 393 26.5 10,414.5 --- CST* 1,443 26.5 38,239.5 --- DEVE** 2,937 19.9 58,446.3 --- DEVM*** 2,112 19.9 42,028.8 --- DSL 86 15.4 1,324.4 --- ECO 1,209 26.5 32,038.5 --- EDU 288 19.9 5,731.2 --- ENG 3,476 26.5 92,114.0 --- ENV 52 15.4 800.8 --- ESL 1,810 23.2 41,992.0 --- FIN 93 19.9 1,850.7 --- FRE 115 19.9 2,288.5 --- GEO 90 26.5 2,385.0 --- GOL 168 26.5 4,452.0 --- HIS 2,274 26.5 60,261.0 --- HLT 78 11 858.0 --- ITD 192 19.9 3,820.8 --- ITE 1,302 19.9 25,909.8 --- ITN 245 19.9 4,875.5 --- ITP 241 19.9 4,795.9 --- MKT 33 19.9 656.7 --- MTH 2,552 26.5 67,628.0 --- MUS 101 19.9 2,009.9 --- NAS 272 15.4 4,188.8 --- PED 602 26.5 15,953.0 --- PHI 147 26.5 3,895.5 --- PHY 408 26.5 10,812.0 --- PLS 300 26.5 7,950.0 --- PSY 2,112 26.5 55,968.0 --- REL 96 26.5 2,544.0 --- SDV 720 26.5 19,080.0 --- SOC 465 26.5 12,322.5 --- SPA 894 19.9 17,790.6 --- WEL 117 15.4 1,801.8 --- Campus 36,978 862,837.8 23.3

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Not applicable

Page 63: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

59

Table 11.ME: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Medical Education Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix DMS 81 11 891.0 --- DNH 1,202 11 13,222.0 --- EMS 1,556 11 17,116.0 --- HIM* 780 11 8,580.0 --- HLT 1,367 11 15,037.0 --- MDL 303 11 3,333.0 --- NUR 5,300 11 58,300.0 --- PTH 811 11 8,921.0 --- RAD 1,517 11 16,687.0 --- ROC 107 11 1,177.0 --- RTH 469 11 5,159.0 --- SDV 485 26.5 12,852.5 --- Campus 13,978 161,275.5 11.5

*Formerly HIT --- Not applicable

Page 64: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

60

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = Woodbridge Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 2,628 19.9 52,297.2 --- ADJ 1,326 19.9 26,387.4 --- AIR 1,304 15.4 20,081.6 --- ARA 80 19.9 1,592.0 --- ART 1,437 19.9 28,596.3 --- AST 453 19.9 9,014.7 --- BIO 2,568 26.5 68,052.0 --- BUS 3,117 19.9 62,028.3 --- CHM 480 26.5 12,720.0 --- CSC 282 26.5 7,473.0 --- CST* 2,376 26.5 62,964.0 --- DEVE** 3,615 19.9 71,938.5 --- DEVM*** 2,250 19.9 44,775.0 --- ECO 1,104 26.5 29,256.0 --- ENG 5,256 26.5 139,284.0 --- ESL 2,090 23.2 48,488.0 --- ETR 110 15.4 1,694.0 --- FIN 231 19.9 4,596.9 --- FRE 90 19.9 1,791.0 --- GEO 99 26.5 2,623.5 --- GER 350 19.9 6,965.0 --- GOL 306 26.5 8,109.0 --- HIS 3,888 26.5 103,032.0 --- HLT 211 11 2,321.0 --- HUM 327 26.5 8,665.5 --- ITD 384 19.9 7,641.6 --- ITE 2,819 19.9 56,098.1 --- ITN 888 19.9 17,671.2 --- ITP 713 19.9 14,188.7 --- LBR 21 19.9 417.9 --- MEC 60 15.4 924.0 --- MKT 219 19.9 4,358.1 --- MTH 2,709 26.5 71,788.5 --- MUS 98 19.9 1,950.2 --- NAS 872 15.4 13,428.8 --- PBS 75 19.9 1,492.5 --- PED 657 26.5 17,410.5 --- PHI 138 26.5 3,657.0 --- PHT 426 19.9 8,477.4 --- PHY 276 26.5 7,314.0 ---

Page 65: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

61

Table 11.WO: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix PLS 258 26.5 6,837.0 --- PSY 2,592 26.5 68,688.0 --- REA 76 19.9 1,512.4 --- REL 231 26.5 6,121.5 --- SDV 750 26.5 19,875.0 --- SOC 1,419 26.5 37,603.5 --- SPA 2,106 19.9 41,909.4 --- Campus 53,765 1,234,111.2 22.9

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math --- Not applicable

Page 66: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

62

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008

Course Campus = ELI Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix ACC 1,650 19.9 32,835.0 --- ADJ 582 19.9 11,581.8 --- ARA 90 19.9 1,791.0 --- ART 864 19.9 17,193.6 --- ASL 129 19.9 2,567.1 --- AST 306 19.9 6,089.4 --- BIO 2,400 26.5 63,600.0 --- BUS 1,689 19.9 33,611.1 --- CHD 273 19.9 5,432.7 --- CHI 25 19.9 497.5 --- CHM 152 26.5 4,028.0 --- CST* 828 26.5 21,942.0 --- DEVE** 424 19.9 8,437.6 --- DEVM*** 532 19.9 10,586.8 --- DNH 184 11 2,024.0 --- DRF 44 15.4 677.6 --- ECO 447 26.5 11,845.5 --- EDU 66 19.9 1,313.4 --- EGR 185 15.4 2,849.0 --- ENG 2,988 26.5 79,182.0 --- ESL 335 23.2 7,772.0 --- FIN 207 19.9 4,119.3 --- FRE 252 19.9 5,014.8 --- GEO 633 26.5 16,774.5 --- GER 255 19.9 5,074.5 --- GIS 44 19.9 875.6 --- HIM**** 304 11 3,344.0 --- HIS 2,199 26.5 58,273.5 --- HLT 391 11 4,301.0 --- HRI 1 19.9 19.9 --- HUM 315 26.5 8,347.5 --- INT 42 19.9 835.8 --- ITD 282 19.9 5,611.8 --- ITE 1,519 19.9 30,228.1 --- ITN 432 19.9 8,596.8 --- ITP 499 19.9 9,930.1 --- JPN 110 19.9 2,189.0 --- LBR 21 19.9 417.9 --- LGL 150 19.9 2,985.0 --- MDL 3 11 33.0 --- MKT 276 19.9 5,492.4 --- MTH 1,972 26.5 52,258.0 --- NAS 1,012 15.4 15,584.8 --- NUR 505 11 5,555.0 ---

Page 67: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

63

Table 11.ELI: Programmatic Mix by Campus -- Fall 2008 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = ELI

Discipline Credits Ratio Multiple Programmatic Mix PBS 75 19.9 1,492.5 --- PED 514 26.5 13,621.0 --- PHI 1,083 26.5 28,699.5 --- PHT 105 19.9 2,089.5 --- PHY 225 26.5 5,962.5 --- PLS 327 26.5 8,665.5 --- PSY 1,572 26.5 41,658.0 --- REL 255 26.5 6,757.5 --- SDV 424 26.5 11,236.0 --- SOC 510 26.5 13,515.0 --- SPA 903 19.9 17,969.7 --- TRV 162 19.9 3,223.8 --- Campus 31,772 726,609.9 22.9

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math ****Formerly HIT --- Not applicable

Page 68: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

64

Table 12 compares the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty ratios.

Table 12: Comparison of Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee Student/Faculty Ratios

Program Discipline/Division Course Level

Appendix M Ratio

JS Ratio

Biological Sciences 04 20 22 18 Business and Commerce Technologies 50 20 16 18 Computer and Info Sciences 07 20 22 18 Data Processing Technologies 51 20 16 18 Education 08 20 22 20 Fine and Applied Arts 10 20 16 18 Foreign Languages 11 20 16 18 Health Services and Paramedical Technologies 52 20 10 10 Interdisciplinary Studies 49 20 22 24 Letters 15 10 15 18 Letters 15 20 22 20 Mathematics 17 10 15 18 Mathematics 17 20 22 20 Mechanical and Engineering Technologies 53 20 12 13 Military Science 18 20 22 24 Natural Science Technologies 54 20 12 14 Physical Sciences 19 20 22 18 Psychology 20 20 22 20 Public Service Related Technologies 55 20 16 18 Social Sciences 22 20 22 24

• Beginning with Fall 2005, the student/faculty ratio for each discipline has changed.

• The new student/faculty ratios are determined under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding

Model rather than the Appendix M guidelines. The Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model was developed by the Joint Subcommittee on Higher Education Funding Policies.

• Table 12 provides a comparison of the Appendix M and Joint Subcommittee student/faculty

ratios. The ratios are presented by program area.

• Table 13 adapts the information from Table 11 and gives the student/faculty ratios by discipline. In Table 13, the report provides the student/faculty ratios developed under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model and compares them with the Appendix M guidelines for each campus and discipline.

• As can be seen in the Table 13, Column 2 gives the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model

Ratio. The Appendix M Ratio can be seen in Column 4.

• Under the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model, each VCCS institution has been provided with an efficiency factor with which they are expected to operate. Since NOVA is expected to operate at 110% efficiency, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model ratio is adjusted by 1.103 and the adjusted ratio is shown in Column 3 of Table 13.

• Under Appendix M guidelines each campus had a different efficiency factor based on their

size. Appendix M ratios adjusted for campus size are shown in Columns 5-10 of Table 13.

Page 69: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

65

Table 13 shows, by discipline, the Base Budget Adequacy Funding Model Ratio (new ratio) and the new ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor. The table also displays, by discipline and campus, the Appendix M ratio (old ratio) and the old ratio adjusted by the NOVA efficiency factor.

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios

Discipline

Base Budget Adequacy

Funding Model Ratio (New

Ratio)

New Ratio Adjusted for

NOVA Efficiency

Factor (110%)

Appendix M

Ratio (Old Ratio)

Old Ratio Adjusted for NOVA Efficiency Factor

AL AN LO MA ME WO

ACC 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ACQ 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ADJ 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AIR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ARA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ARC 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ART 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ASL 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AST 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 AUB 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 AUT 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 BIO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 BLD 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 BUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHD 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHI 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 CHM 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 CON 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- CIV 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 CSC 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 CST/SPD* 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 DEVE** 18 19.9 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 DEVM*** 18 19.9 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 DIT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- DMS 10 11.0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- DNH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- DRF 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 DSL 14 15.4 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ECO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 EDU 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 EGR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ELE 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 EMS/EMT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- ENG 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 ENV 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 18.2 13.2 --- 13.9 ESL 21 23.2 15 18.0 18.2 17.1 17.0 --- 17.4 ESR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 ETR 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 FIN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 FRE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 FST/FIR 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 GEO 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 GER 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 GIS 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- GOL 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 GRE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HIM/HIT**** 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- HIN 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HIS 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5

Page 70: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

66

Table 13: Student/Faculty Ratio by Discipline -- Comparison of “Old” and “New” Ratios (Cont’d)

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math ****Formerly HIT --- Data not available

Discipline

Base Budget Adequacy

Funding Model Ratio (New

Ratio)

New Ratio Adjusted for

NOVA Efficiency

Factor (110%)

Appendix M Ratio

(Old Ratio)

Old Ratio Adjusted for NOVA Efficiency Factor

AL AN LO MA ME WO

HLT 10 11.0 10 10.8 10.8 --- --- --- --- HMS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HRI 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 HRT 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 HUM 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 IDS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 INT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITD 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITE 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 ITP 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 JPN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 KOR 18 19.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- LAT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 LBR 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 LGL 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MDA 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- MDL 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- MEC 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 MET 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MKT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 MSC 24 26.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- MTH 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 MUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 NAS 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 NUR 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- OMP 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- OPT 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- PBS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 PED 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PHI 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PHT 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 PHY 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PLS 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PSY 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 PTH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- RAD 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- REA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 REL 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 ROC 10 11.0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- RPK 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 RTH 10 11.0 10 --- 10.8 --- --- --- --- RUS 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 SDV/STD 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 SOC 24 26.5 22 26.5 26.5 25.1 24.9 --- 25.5 SPA 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 SSC 24 26.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- TRV 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 VET 10 11.0 12 --- 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9 VTN 18 19.9 16 19.3 19.4 18.2 18.1 --- 18.6 WEL 14 15.4 12 14.4 14.6 13.5 13.2 --- 13.9

Page 71: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

67

Table 14 displays discipline prefixes used in this report and gives a description. As five-year trend data are displayed in this report, this table includes disciplines that may have been phased out within the last five years.

Table 14: Course Prefixes and Descriptions

Prefix Description Prefix Description ACC ACCOUNTING HRI HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT ACQ ACQUISITIONS HRT HORTICULTURE ADJ ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE HUM HUMANITIES AIR AIR CONDITIONING & REFRIGERATION INT INTERPRETER EDUCATION ARA ARABIC IST INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ARC ARCHITECTURE ITA ITALIAN ART ARTS ITD INFORMATION TECH DATABASE &DESIGN ASL AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE ITE INFORMATION TECH ESSENTIALS AST ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY ITN INFORMATION TECH NETWORKING AUB AUTO BODY ITP INFORMATION TECH PROGRAMMING AUT AUTOMOTIVE JPN JAPANESE BIO BIOLOGY KOR KOREAN BLD BUILDING LAT LATIN BUS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & ADMIN. LBR LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY CHD CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT LGL PARALEGAL STUDIES CHI CHINESE MDA MEDICAL ASSISTING CHM CHEMISTRY MDL MEDICAL LABORATORY CIV CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY MEC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CON CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MET MEDIA TECHNOLOGY CSC COMPUTER SCIENCE MKT MARKETING

CST/SPD COMMUNICATION STUDIES & THEATER (formerly SPD) MSC MILITARY SCIENCE

DEVE DEVELOPMENTAL ENGLIGH MTH MATHEMATICS DEVM DEVELOPMENTAL MATH MUS MUSIC DIT DIETETICS NAS NATURAL SCIENCE DMS DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY NUR NURSING DNH DENTAL HYGIENE OMP OPHTHALMIC MEDICAL PERSONNEL DRF DRAFTING OPT OPTICIANRY DSL DIESEL PBS PUBLIC SERVICE ECO ECONOMICS PED PHYSICAL EDUCATION & RECREATION EDU EDUCATION PHI PHILOSOPHY EGR ENGINEERING PHT PHOTOGRAPHY ELE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY PHY PHYSICS

EMS/EMT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (formerly EMT) PLS POLITICAL SCIENCE

ENG ENGLISH PSY PSYCHOLOGY ENV ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE PTH PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT ESL ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE RAD RADIOLOGY ESR ELECTRONIC SERVICING REA REAL ESTATE ETR ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY REL RELIGION FIN FINANCIAL SERVICES ROC RADIATION ONCOLOGY FRE FRENCH RPK RECREATION & PARKS FST/FIR FIRE SCIENCE (formerly FIR) RTH RESPIRATORY THERAPY GEO GEOGRAPHY RUS RUSSIAN GER GERMAN SDV/STD COLLEGE SUCCESS SKILLS (formerly STD) GIS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS SCM SIGN COMMUNICATIONS GOL GEOLOGY SOC SOCIOLOGY GRE GREEK SPA SPANISH

HIM/HIT HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (formerly HIT) SSC SOCIAL SCIENCE

HIN HINDI TEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT HIS HISTORY TRV TRAVEL & TOURISM HLT HEALTH VET VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY HMS HUMAN SERVICES VTN VIETNAMESE IDS INTERIOR DESIGN WEL WELDING

Page 72: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

APPENDIX

Page 73: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

69

APPENDIX: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and

Discipline -- Fall 2009 The following tables provide information by campus for each discipline. All tables show the number of FTES for Fall 2009 (preliminary) in column 2 and the Current Funded Ratio (CFR) in column 3. Based on the FTES and the CFR, the FTEF Requirement for each discipline is calculated. The FTEF Requirement is calculated by dividing the actual FTES by the CFR, as shown in column 4 of the table. The tables also give Fall 2009 full-time FTEF in column 5 and part-time FTEF in column 7. Column 6 shows the difference between the FTEF requirement and the full-time faculty utilized (FTEF). Data was extracted from the NVCC Faculty Ratios PeopleSoft query in the middle of the Fall 2009 semester.

AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 169.2 19.9 8.5 6.0 2.5 1.4 ADJ 25.0 19.9 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.6 ARA 29.5 19.9 1.5 1.0 0.5 1.7 ARC 60.7 15.4 3.9 1.2 2.7 0.8 ART 216.8 19.9 10.9 8.7 2.2 6.6 AST 3.8 19.9 0.2 0.6 -0.4 1.0 AUB 12.8 15.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.5 AUT 81.7 15.4 5.3 4.8 0.5 1.1 BIO 431.6 26.5 16.3 5.5 10.8 9.9 BLD 25.2 15.4 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.5 BUS 134.8 19.9 6.8 5.2 1.6 2.0 CHD 89.8 19.9 4.5 1.8 2.7 2.0 CHI 13.9 19.9 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.7 CHM 153.1 26.5 5.8 3.4 2.4 2.3 CIV 11.6 15.4 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.6 CON 32.0 19.9 1.6 1.4 0.2 0.0 CSC 43.3 26.5 1.6 0.2 1.4 1.9 CST* 172.6 26.5 6.5 4.4 2.1 4.6 DEVE** 268.7 19.9 13.5 5.9 7.6 6.7 DEVM*** 160.5 19.9 8.1 3.3 4.8 2.9 DRF 39.2 15.4 2.5 0.5 2.0 2.1 ECO 142.4 26.5 5.4 1.0 4.4 4.4 EDU 6.0 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 EGR 20.1 15.4 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.1 ENG 450.4 26.5 17.0 10.6 6.4 12.0 ESL 584.9 23.2 25.2 14.7 10.5 15.3 FIN 4.2 19.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 FRE 49.7 19.9 2.5 3.3 -0.8 0.9

Page 74: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

70

AL: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by

Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Course Campus = Alexandria

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

GEO 19.6 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.2 GER 5.7 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 GOL 59.9 26.5 2.3 0.8 1.5 1.7 GRE 3.8 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 HIN 1.7 19.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 HIS 335.5 26.5 12.7 5.5 7.2 7.8 HLT 5.4 11.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 HMS 28.4 19.9 1.4 0.0 1.4 1.2 HUM 31.5 26.5 1.2 1.7 -0.5 0.3 ITA 21.4 19.9 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.2 ITD 29.2 19.9 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.6 ITE 161.0 19.9 8.1 5.8 2.3 1.8 ITN 70.9 19.9 3.6 2.6 1.0 2.3 ITP 58.7 19.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 1.2 JPN 45.5 19.9 2.3 1.0 1.3 1.8 LAT 8.2 19.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.4 LGL 101.8 19.9 5.1 1.1 4.0 3.6 MKT 20.0 19.9 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.6 MTH 289.9 26.5 10.9 6.9 4.0 3.7 MUS 76.1 19.9 3.8 4.1 -0.3 2.3 NAS 96.8 15.4 6.3 1.6 4.7 2.1 PED 126.5 26.5 4.8 1.7 3.1 3.2 PHI 58.4 26.5 2.2 0.8 1.4 1.6 PHT 83.9 19.9 4.2 3.0 1.2 2.9 PHY 65.3 26.5 2.5 1.8 0.7 1.1 PLS 55.0 26.5 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.6 PSY 237.2 26.5 9.0 2.0 7.0 7.8 REA 12.6 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.7 REL 26.6 26.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 RUS 18.3 19.9 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.2 SDV 93.4 26.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 3.8 SOC 78.8 26.5 3.0 2.2 0.8 1.2 SPA 103.3 19.9 5.2 2.1 3.1 3.7 VTN 7.1 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.5

Page 75: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

71

AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Current Funded

Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 233.4 19.9 11.7 5.6 6.1 2.6 ADJ 166.1 19.9 8.3 4.8 3.5 2.3 ARA 38.3 19.9 1.9 0.0 1.9 2.1 ARC 53.5 15.4 3.5 2.6 0.9 1.1 ART 214.2 19.9 10.8 8.9 1.9 6.7 ASL 99.7 19.9 5.0 1.3 3.7 4.1 BIO 796.3 26.5 30.0 9.7 20.3 15.5 BUS 228.4 19.9 11.5 5.0 6.5 4.4 CHI 20.4 19.9 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.6 CHM 184.3 26.5 7.0 5.1 1.9 3.3 CSC 104.6 26.5 3.9 3.6 0.3 1.1 CST* 295.4 26.5 11.1 8.8 2.3 3.8 DEVE** 577.4 19.9 29.0 10.0 19.0 16.2 DEVM*** 459.0 19.9 23.1 7.7 15.4 7.5 DIT 57.8 11.0 5.3 0.4 4.9 1.2 DRF 23.2 15.4 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.5 ECO 311.4 26.5 11.8 5.0 6.8 4.0 EDU 8.8 19.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 EGR 119.3 15.4 7.7 5.6 2.1 0.7 ENG 943.7 26.5 35.6 22.6 13.0 23.2 ENV 5.2 15.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 ESL 605.7 23.2 26.1 17.3 8.8 12.3 ETR 10.7 15.4 0.7 0.8 -0.1 0.0 FIN 18.4 19.9 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.2 FRE 45.3 19.9 2.3 0.0 2.3 2.3 FST 13.0 19.9 0.7 1.0 -0.3 0.0 GEO 7.8 26.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 GER 20.7 19.9 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 GOL 76.7 26.5 2.9 1.8 1.1 0.5 HIS 614.6 26.5 23.2 8.4 14.8 9.4 HRI 106.1 19.9 5.3 2.7 2.6 2.8 HUM 36.8 26.5 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 INT 23.4 19.9 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.4 ITD 28.2 19.9 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.6 ITE 331.4 19.9 16.7 8.6 8.1 5.8 ITN 66.6 19.9 3.3 2.4 0.9 1.0 ITP 47.3 19.9 2.4 2.0 0.4 0.7 KOR 12.7 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.7 MEC 2.0 15.4 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.0 MKT 60.6 19.9 3.0 0.8 2.2 1.8

Page 76: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

72

AN: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Annandale

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

MSC 3.0 26.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 MTH 870.5 26.5 32.8 20.5 12.3 10.3 MUS 101.5 19.9 5.1 6.6 -1.5 1.4 NAS 241.3 15.4 15.7 4.0 11.7 5.6 PED 267.3 26.5 10.1 3.6 6.5 5.5 PHI 151.4 26.5 5.7 2.6 3.1 2.4 PHY 133.5 26.5 5.0 3.0 2.0 2.3 PLS 51.6 26.5 1.9 1.4 0.5 0.6 PSY 403.8 26.5 15.2 6.2 9.0 3.6 REA 2.9 19.9 0.1 0.3 -0.2 0.0 REL 14.0 26.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.6 RPK 19.8 19.9 1.0 1.9 -0.9 0.1 SDV 126.5 26.5 4.8 0.0 4.8 3.3 SOC 227.8 26.5 8.6 3.2 5.4 4.0 SPA 158.6 19.9 8.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 TRV 30.6 19.9 1.5 1.4 0.1 1.3

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Page 77: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

73

LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 122.6 19.9 6.2 2.4 3.8 2.8 ARA 14.1 19.9 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.5 ART 160.9 19.9 8.1 4.5 3.6 7.0 AST 3.1 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 BIO 174.5 26.5 6.6 2.3 4.3 2.9 BUS 103.8 19.9 5.2 2.0 3.2 2.4 CHD 39.8 19.9 2.0 1.7 0.3 1.8 CHM 81.8 26.5 3.1 2.5 0.6 0.9 CSC 37.4 26.5 1.4 0.3 1.1 1.4 CST* 129.8 26.5 4.9 2.0 2.9 4.6 DEVE** 241.9 19.9 12.2 5.5 6.7 6.5 DEVM*** 239.1 19.9 12.0 4.2 7.8 5.6 ECO 127.6 26.5 4.8 2.0 2.8 2.4 EDU 4.4 19.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 ENG 381.1 26.5 14.4 6.2 8.2 10.8 ENV 2.8 15.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 ESL 204.3 23.2 8.8 4.7 4.1 5.7 FIN 6.8 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 FRE 8.3 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.3 GEO 57.6 26.5 2.2 1.0 1.2 1.4 GER 9.9 19.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 GIS 16.4 19.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.5 GOL 90.1 26.5 3.4 1.6 1.8 1.9 HIS 386.0 26.5 14.6 5.4 9.2 6.8 HLT 6.2 11.0 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 HRT 37.3 15.4 2.4 2.3 0.1 0.3 HUM 18.8 26.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.8 IDS 38.8 19.9 1.9 1.8 0.1 0.6 ITA 11.8 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.5 ITD 6.6 19.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 ITE 153.7 19.9 7.7 2.3 5.4 4.1 ITN 22.3 19.9 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 ITP 19.7 19.9 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.7 MKT 16.0 19.9 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.6 MTH 370.7 26.5 14.0 8.5 5.5 6.8 MUS 57.6 19.9 2.9 4.5 -1.6 2.7 NAS 68.3 15.4 4.4 1.3 3.1 1.3 PED 72.5 26.5 2.7 1.3 1.4 1.6 PHI 28.6 26.5 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.8

Page 78: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

74

LO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Loudoun

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

PLS 32.6 26.5 1.2 0.0 1.2 1.4 PSY 205.4 26.5 7.8 3.4 4.4 4.4 REL 40.6 26.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.6 RUS 5.7 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 SDV 31.5 26.5 1.2 0.1 1.1 1.3 SOC 81.6 26.5 3.1 1.0 2.1 1.8 SPA 68.9 19.9 3.5 1.4 2.1 1.5 VET 71.1 11.0 6.5 3.6 2.9 0.2

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Page 79: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

75

MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 51.2 19.9 2.6 1.2 1.4 1.2 ADJ 70.4 19.9 3.5 1.2 2.3 3.2 ARA 9.5 19.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 ART 86.0 19.9 4.3 3.7 0.6 1.1 AUT 75.0 15.4 4.9 3.1 1.8 2.9 BIO 199.2 26.5 7.5 3.4 4.1 3.7 BUS 47.6 19.9 2.4 1.0 1.4 1.4 CHD 75.0 19.9 3.8 3.0 0.8 1.0 CHM 43.1 26.5 1.6 1.4 0.2 1.5 CSC 24.3 26.5 0.9 1.2 -0.3 0.0 CST* 92.6 26.5 3.5 1.8 1.7 1.8 DEVE** 192.1 19.9 9.7 4.1 5.6 5.9 DEVM*** 150.9 19.9 7.6 3.7 3.9 3.6 DSL 6.1 15.4 0.4 0.5 -0.1 0.0 ECO 86.8 26.5 3.3 0.8 2.5 1.6 EDU 18.8 19.9 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.6 EGR 1.2 15.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 ENG 261.7 26.5 9.9 5.4 4.5 6.3 ENV 4.8 15.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5 ESL 136.0 23.2 5.9 3.3 2.6 4.3 ETR 2.1 15.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 FIN 7.6 19.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 FRE 10.1 19.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 GEO 5.4 26.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 GOL 12.5 26.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 HIS 176.0 26.5 6.6 4.0 2.6 1.8 HLT 9.8 11.0 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.0 ITD 24.6 19.9 1.2 0.0 1.2 1.2 ITE 95.4 19.9 4.8 2.4 2.4 1.9 ITN 36.0 19.9 1.8 0.7 1.1 2.4 ITP 15.3 19.9 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.4 MEC 3.2 15.4 0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.0 MKT 4.4 19.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 MTH 201.9 26.5 7.6 4.9 2.7 4.3 MUS 11.4 19.9 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.5 NAS 21.9 15.4 1.4 0.5 0.9 0.3 PED 54.4 26.5 2.1 0.4 1.7 1.7 PHI 9.4 26.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 PHY 22.5 26.5 0.8 1.1 -0.3 0.2

Page 80: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

76

MA: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Manassas

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

PLS 16.4 26.5 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 PSY 154.8 26.5 5.8 2.6 3.2 3.8 REL 11.6 26.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 SDV 46.2 26.5 1.7 0.1 1.6 1.2 SOC 39.6 26.5 1.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 SPA 63.1 19.9 3.2 1.5 1.7 1.7 WEL 12.1 15.4 0.8 0.9 -0.1 0.0

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Page 81: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

77

ME: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Medical Education

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

DMS 14.6 11.0 1.3 1.5 -0.2 0.0 DNH 71.2 11.0 6.5 1.9 4.6 0.3 EMS 107.7 11.0 9.8 4.7 5.1 2.3 HIM* 68.7 11.0 6.2 2.0 4.2 1.5 HLT 121.2 11.0 11.0 2.1 8.9 2.9 MDL 23.9 11.0 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.6 NUR 282.1 11.0 25.6 6.5 19.1 0.3 PTH 55.2 11.0 5.0 0.9 4.1 0.7 RAD 99.4 11.0 9.0 4.1 4.9 0.0 ROC 3.7 11.0 0.3 0.6 -0.3 0.1 RTH 34.5 11.0 3.1 1.7 1.4 0.8 SDV 49.9 26.5 1.9 0.3 1.6 1.6

*Formerly HIT

Page 82: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

78

WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

ACC 157.8 19.9 7.9 5.4 2.5 4.4 ADJ 110.6 19.9 5.6 2.0 3.6 4.2 AIR 93.3 15.4 6.1 3.1 3.0 2.2 ART 113.5 19.9 5.7 1.8 3.9 3.7 AST 34.4 19.9 1.7 4.4 -2.7 0.0 BIO 197.3 26.5 7.4 1.6 5.8 4.3 BUS 191.4 19.9 9.6 3.2 6.4 7.8 CHD 6.6 19.9 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 CHM 34.1 26.5 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.8 CSC 23.5 26.5 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.9 CST* 141.6 26.5 5.3 3.6 1.7 4.4 DEVE** 304.1 19.9 15.3 7.1 8.2 6.7 DEVM*** 152.3 19.9 7.7 4.3 3.4 3.6 ECO 80.6 26.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 EDU 4.8 19.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 ENG 406.4 26.5 15.3 6.4 8.9 12.8 ESL 148.0 23.2 6.4 7.7 -1.3 2.3 ETR 21.3 15.4 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.0 FIN 16.6 19.9 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.2 FRE 9.7 19.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.7 GEO 9.2 26.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 GER 20.1 19.9 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.5 GOL 18.9 26.5 0.7 0.8 -0.1 0.0 HIS 274.2 26.5 10.3 3.8 6.5 4.0 HLT 12.8 11.0 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.5 HUM 22.8 26.5 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.8 ITD 34.6 19.9 1.7 0.8 0.9 1.6 ITE 236.5 19.9 11.9 5.8 6.1 7.2 ITN 58.8 19.9 3.0 3.9 -0.9 3.3 ITP 54.3 19.9 2.7 1.5 1.2 3.5 LBR 0.3 19.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 MEC 9.7 15.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 MKT 13.4 19.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.6 MTH 207.6 26.5 7.8 6.7 1.1 1.6 MUS 7.5 19.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.5 NAS 74.4 15.4 4.8 1.3 3.5 0.8 PBS 3.0 19.9 0.2 0.6 -0.4 0.0 PED 53.9 26.5 2.0 0.9 1.1 1.4 PHI 14.0 26.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.4

Page 83: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

79

WO: FTES, Current Funded Ratio, and FTEF Requirement by Campus and Discipline -- Fall 2009 (Cont’d)

Course Campus = Woodbridge

Discipline FTES Current Funded Ratio

FTEF Requirement FT FTEF Difference PT FTEF

PHT 37.6 19.9 1.9 1.4 0.5 1.4 PHY 28.8 26.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.5 PLS 3.0 26.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 PSY 187.4 26.5 7.1 3.6 3.5 3.0 REA 1.6 19.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 REL 24.0 26.5 0.9 0.0 0.9 1.4 SDV 60.2 26.5 2.3 0.0 2.3 2.4 SOC 120.8 26.5 4.6 1.6 3.0 2.2 SPA 121.0 19.9 6.1 3.2 2.9 4.1

*Formerly SPD **Developmental English ***Developmental Math

Page 84: Selected Trend Data on Disciplines: Fall 2005 to Fall 2009 · 2020. 4. 29. · also give Fall 2009 full-time faculty headcount in column 5 that was provided by the Human Resources

NOVA Mission and Strategic Goals: 2005 – 2015

Mission The mission of Northern Virginia Community College is to respond to the educational needs of its dynamic and diverse constituencies through an array of comprehensive programs and services that facilitate learning and workforce development in an environment of open access and lifelong educational opportunities.

Strategic Goals

I. STUDENT SUCCESS - Northern Virginia Community College will move into the top tier of community colleges with respect to the retention, graduation, transfer, and career placement of its students.

II. ACCESS – Northern Virginia Community College will increase the number and diversity

of students being served to mirror the population growth of the region.

III. TEACHING AND LEARNING – Northern Virginia Community College will focus on student success by creating an environment of world-class teaching and learning.

IV. EXCELLENCE — Northern Virginia Community College will develop ten focal points of

excellence in its educational programs and services that will be benchmarked to being the best in the nation and strategic to building the college's overall reputation for quality.

V. LEADERSHIP – Northern Virginia Community College will serve as a catalyst and a

leader in developing educational and economic opportunities for all Northern Virginians and in maintaining the quality of life and economic competitiveness of the region.

VI. PARTNERSHIPS – Northern Virginia Community College will develop strategic

partnerships to create gateways of opportunity and an integrated educational system for Northern Virginians who are pursuing the American Dream.

VII. RESOURCES – Northern Virginia Community College will increase its annual funding

by $100 million and expand its physical facilities by one million square feet in new construction. This includes the establishment of two additional campuses in Western Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, as well as additional education and training facilities in or near established population centers.