21
C H A P T E R Types of Seed Dormancy I. PURPOSE Nikolaeva was the first seed biologist to develop a comprehensive classification scheme for the various types of seed dormancy, and it was published in Russian in 1967 and in English 2 years later (Nikolaeva, 1969). In 1977, Nikolaeva expanded and revised the system; this version is still the best general classification scheme for seed dormancy types available today. In this chapter, seed dormancy will be defined and an overview of each of Nikolaeva's six broad categories of dormancy will be presented. Also, types of dormancy will be considered in relation to types of seeds. II. DEFINITION OF DORMANCY To many people, seed dormancy simply means that a seed has not germinated, but we will soon see that this definition is inadequate. Unfavorable environmen- tal conditions are one reason for lack of seed germina- tion. That is, seeds could be in a paper bag on the laboratory shelf (i.e., lack of water), buried in mud at the bottom of a lake (i.e., insufficient oxygen and/or light), or exposed to temperatures that are above or below those suitable for plant growth. These obviously unfavorable conditions for germination are examples of how the environment rather than some factor associated with the seed per se prevents germination. A second reason why seeds may not germinate is that some property of the seed (or dispersal unit) prevents it. Thus, the lack of germination is a seed rather than an environmental problem. Dormancy that results from some characteristic of the seed is called organic dor- mancy, and this type of dormancy usually is of most interest to seed biologists and ecologists. In fact. throughout the remainder of this book, we will be con- cerned with organic seed dormancy. According to Nikolaeva (1969, 1977) there are two general types of organic seed dormancy: endogenous and exogenous (Table 3.1). In endogenous dormancy, some characteristic of the embryo prevents germination, whereas in exogenous dormancy, some characteristic of structures, including endosperm (sometimes per- isperm), seed coats, or fruit walls, covering the embryo prevents germination. For example, seeds may not ger- minate because the seed (or fruit) coats are imperme- able to water. Before seeds with either endogenous or exogenous dormancy can germinate, changes must oc- cur in seeds that remove the block(s) to germination. The challenge of germination ecologists is to define the environmental conditions required to bring about changes in seeds that result in a release from dormancy and to correlate these with factors that promote dor- mancy break in nature. III. TYPES OF SEEDS Before discussing the types of dormancy, we will take a look at the various types of seeds because frequently there is a relationship between the two. Martin (1946) distinguished 12 types of seeds based on embryo morphology, relative amount of endosperm, and position of the embryo in relation to the endosperm (Table 3.2). Linear and spatulate are the only types of seeds found in extant gymnosperms (Table 3.2). The Gnetaceae is the only gymnosperm family whose seeds have spatulate embryos, although some of the more advanced members of the Pinaceae have slightly expanded cotyledons (Mar- tin, 1946). 27

Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

  • Upload
    carol-c

  • View
    219

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

C H A P T E R

Types of Seed Dormancy

I. PURPOSE

Nikolaeva was the first seed biologist to develop a comprehensive classification scheme for the various types of seed dormancy, and it was published in Russian in 1967 and in English 2 years later (Nikolaeva, 1969). In 1977, Nikolaeva expanded and revised the system; this version is still the best general classification scheme for seed dormancy types available today. In this chapter, seed dormancy will be defined and an overview of each of Nikolaeva's six broad categories of dormancy will be presented. Also, types of dormancy will be considered in relation to types of seeds.

II. DEFINITION OF DORMANCY

To many people, seed dormancy simply means that a seed has not germinated, but we will soon see that this definition is inadequate. Unfavorable environmen­tal conditions are one reason for lack of seed germina­tion. That is, seeds could be in a paper bag on the laboratory shelf (i.e., lack of water), buried in mud at the bottom of a lake (i.e., insufficient oxygen and/or light), or exposed to temperatures that are above or below those suitable for plant growth. These obviously unfavorable conditions for germination are examples of how the environment rather than some factor associated with the seed per se prevents germination.

A second reason why seeds may not germinate is that some property of the seed (or dispersal unit) prevents it. Thus, the lack of germination is a seed rather than an environmental problem. Dormancy that results from some characteristic of the seed is called organic dor­mancy, and this type of dormancy usually is of most interest to seed biologists and ecologists. In fact.

throughout the remainder of this book, we will be con­cerned with organic seed dormancy.

According to Nikolaeva (1969, 1977) there are two general types of organic seed dormancy: endogenous and exogenous (Table 3.1). In endogenous dormancy, some characteristic of the embryo prevents germination, whereas in exogenous dormancy, some characteristic of structures, including endosperm (sometimes per-isperm), seed coats, or fruit walls, covering the embryo prevents germination. For example, seeds may not ger­minate because the seed (or fruit) coats are imperme­able to water. Before seeds with either endogenous or exogenous dormancy can germinate, changes must oc­cur in seeds that remove the block(s) to germination. The challenge of germination ecologists is to define the environmental conditions required to bring about changes in seeds that result in a release from dormancy and to correlate these with factors that promote dor­mancy break in nature.

III. TYPES OF SEEDS

Before discussing the types of dormancy, we will take a look at the various types of seeds because frequently there is a relationship between the two. Martin (1946) distinguished 12 types of seeds based on embryo morphology, relative amount of endosperm, and position of the embryo in relation to the endosperm (Table 3.2).

Linear and spatulate are the only types of seeds found in extant gymnosperms (Table 3.2). The Gnetaceae is the only gymnosperm family whose seeds have spatulate embryos, although some of the more advanced members of the Pinaceae have slightly expanded cotyledons (Mar­tin, 1946).

27

Page 2: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

28 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

TABLE 3.1 Simplified Version of NIkolaeva's (1977) Classification Scheme of Organic Seed DormanQ^ Types

Type Cause Broken by

Endogenous dormancy Physiological Physiological inhibiting mechanism (PIM) of germination Warm and/or cold stratification Morphological Underdeveloped embryo Appropriate conditions for embryo growth/germination Morphophysiological PIM of germination and underdeveloped embryo Warm and/or cold stratification

Exogenous dormancy Physical Seed (fruit) coats impermeable to water Opening of specialized structure Chemical Germination inhibitors Leaching Mechanical Woody structures restrict growth Warm and/or cold stratification

Six types of seeds are found among the monocots (Table 3.2). With respect to seeds with linear embryos, some interesting differences are found between mono­cots and dicots. Linear embryos in most dicots are sur­rounded completely by endosperm (Fig. 3.1a), but in some species the radicular end of the embryo touches the base of the seed (Fig. 3.1b). The radicular end of the embryo also touches the base of the seed in a large number of monocots (Fig. 3.1c). The linear embryo ex­tends to both ends of the seed in the monocot family Pontederiaceae (Fig. 3.Id), and in the Cannaceae (Fig.

3.1e), Zingiberaceae, Sparganiaceae, Pontederiaceae, and in some Arecaceae and Commelinaceae the radicu­lar end of the embryo extends into a depression at the base of the seed (Martin, 1946). No endosperm is pres­ent in seeds of various monocot families, including the Cymodoceaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Najadaceae, Posi-doniaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Zannichelliaceae, Zost-eraceae, and some Araceae, and food reserves are stored in the greatly enlarged hypocotyl (Goebel, 1905; Dahlgren and Clifford, 1982); these are called macropo-dous embryos (Fig. 3.1f). Because macropodous em-

TABLE 3.2 Characteristics of the 12 Seed Types'

Relative size

Type of seed

Broad

Capitate

Lateral

Peripheral

Rudimentary

Dwarf

Micro

Linear

Spatulate

Investing

Bent

Folded

Embryo position, size/sliape

Q Q C O Q &

e Q D •

O

Representative family Seed Embryo Phylogenetic occurrence^

Juncaceae

Cyperaceae

Poaceae

Caryophyllaceae

Ranunculaceae

Ericaceae

Orchidaceae

Liliaceae

Lamiaceae

Rhamnaceae

Fabaceae

Malvaceae

Large

Large

Large

Large

Large

Small

Minute

Large

Large

Large

Large

Large

Small

Small

Small

Large

Small

Small

Minute

Small

Large

Large

Large

Large

G

G

M

M

M

M

M

M

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

' From Martin (1946). Black, embryo; white, endosperm. ' G, gymnosperm; M, monocot; and D, dicot.

Page 3: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 29

Q 0 (^ •endosperm

embryo

d) (D plumule

hypocotyl

FIGURE 3.1 Linear embryos in seeds, (a) Dicot with linear embryo surrounded by endosperm (Apiaceae). (b) Dicot with linear embryo touching base of seed (Lardizabalaceae). (c) Monocot with linear embryo touching base of seed (Amaryllidaceae). (d) Monocot with linear embryo touching both poles of seed (Pontederiaceae). (e) Monocot with embryo extending into a depression at base of seed (Cannaceae). (f) Monocot with macropodous (linear) embryo (Hy-drocharitaceae). a—e modified from Martin (1946), f modified from Dahlgren and Clifford (1982).

bryos are longer than broad, Martin (1946) placed seeds with this type into the linear category.

Ten types of seeds occur among dicots, but five of them are not found in monocots (Table 3.2). However, two types, capitate and lateral, occur in monocots but not in dicots. In the dicot families Cactaceae, Clusiaceae, and Lecythidaceae, food reserves may be stored in the hypocotyl rather than in the cotyledons or endosperm (Goebel, 1905). A hypocotyl with stored food is en­larged, and the cotyledons are minute, resulting in some­thing that looks like macropodous embryos of mono­cots. Martin (1946) placed Cactaceae seeds into the peripheral category. Although the hypocotyl of Cacta­ceae embryos is enlarged (and the cotyledons tiny), a small amount of endosperm is present in seeds of some genera, and the embryo is external to it.

IV. OVERVIEW OF TYPES OF SEED DORMANCY

A. Physiological Dormancy

Physiological dormancy (PD) occurs in representa­tives of all 12 types of seeds, so the type of seed is not the cause of PD. Most seeds with PD are permeable to water, but there are a few exceptions (see Section IV,E). PD is caused by a physiological inhibiting mechanism of the embryo that prevents radicle emergence. However, structures that cover the embryo, including endosperm, seed coats, and indehiscent fruit walls, may play a role in

preventing germination. Nikolaeva (1977) distinguished three levels of PD: nondeep, intermediate, and deep.

1. Nondeep Physiological Dormancy: Description

Nondeep PD is common in seeds of most weeds, vegetables, many garden flowers, and some woody plants. Freshly matured seeds with nondeep PD either cannot germinate at any temperature or they germinate only over a very narrow range of temperatures. Embryos excised from seeds usually grow, and the resulting seed­lings are normal. Nondeep PD in some species is broken by relatively short periods of cold stratification ranging from 5 days in Triticum sp. (Nikolaeva, 1969) to 60-90 days in Impatiens hiflora (Crocker, 1948). Seeds stored dry at room temperatures come out of dormancy (afterripen). However, the time required for seeds to afterripen usually is much longer than that required for dormancy loss during cold stratification. Seeds of Digitaria ischaemum required 8 weeks of cold stratifica­tion at 3°C or 1 year of dry storage at room temperature to become nondormant (Toole and Toole, 1941). Seeds of Ambrosia trifida came out of dormancy during 3 months of cold stratification at 5°C, whereas some seeds stored dry in the laboratory remained dormant after 1 or more years (Davis, 1930).

In other species, nondeep PD is broken by exposure to high (^15°C) temperatures, and the dormancy break is incomplete, or does not occur at all, if seeds are cold stratified (Baskin and Baskin, 1986a). The time required for dormancy break at high temperatures ranges from several weeks to many months, depending on the spe­cies. At 35/20°C (simulated summer field temperatures), imbibed seeds of Lamiiim purpureum (Baskin and Baskin, 1984a) became nondormant after 8 weeks, whereas those of L. amplexicaule (Baskin and Baskin, 1984b) required 12 weeks to come out of dormancy. Seeds of Echinochloa turnerana required 28 weeks of dry storage at room temperatures (28°C) for loss of dormancy (Conover and Geiger, 1984). Dormancy loss may occur at high temperatures regardless of whether seeds are imbibed. Rates of dormancy loss in seeds of the winter annuals Draba verna and Holosteum umbella-tum stored dry at room temperatures were about the same as those of seeds imbibed at 35/20°C (Baskin and Baskin, unpublished results).

Nondeep PD can be broken by chemicals, including potassium nitrate (Toole, 1941), thiourea (Garman and Barton, 1946; Baskin and Baskin, 1971a), kinetin (Reyn­olds and Thompson, 1973), ethylene (Egley, 1982), and gibberellins (Khan et al, 1957; Dunwell, 1981; Watkins and Cantliffe, 1983a). The amount of exogenous gibber-ellic acid (GA) required for the germination of Avena fatua seeds decreased with an increase in the afterripen-

Page 4: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

30 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

ing period (Hsiao and Quick, 1985). Embryos excised from dormant seeds of A. fatua line M73 did not grow unless treated with GA and/or fructose, whereas those excised from fully afterripened (nondormant) seeds grew without any treatments. Although embryos excised from dormant A, fatua seeds germinated when treated with GA and/or fructose, rates of germination and seed­ling growth were less than those for embryos from non-dormant seeds (Myers et ai, 1997).

A light requirement for germination is another mani­festation of nondeep PD (Nikolaeva, 1977). Seeds of some species lose their light requirement for germina­tion as they come out of dormancy in response to cold stratification (Baskin and Baskin, 1994) or high summer temperatures (Baskin and Baskin, 1982), but those of other species have a light requirement for germination after they have received dormancy-breaking treatments (Baskin and Baskin, 1976).

2. Nondeep Physiological Dormancy: Causes

Many questions remain to be answered about non-deep PD. If removal or disruption of structures that cover the embryo, such as the endosperm, seed coats, fruits coats, and bracts, including palea and lemma (or "hulls") of grasses, results in germination, is dormancy caused by covering structures? If intact seeds germinate after they have been given dormancy-breaking treat­ments, such as warm or cold stratification, is dormancy caused by the embryo or by an interaction between the embryo and its covering structures?

a. Covering Structures: Oxygen Concentration

Nikolaeva (1969) attributed nondeep PD to the low permeability of embryo covers to oxygen. In fact, good evidence suggests that these structures can restrict the movement of oxygen to the embryo (Come and Tis-saoui, 1972; Brown and van Staden, 1973; Dungey and Pinfield, 1980). Also, in some seeds, phenolic com­pounds in embryo covers fix oxygen by oxidation (Come and Tissaoui, 1972; Coumans et ai, 1976), thus making it unavailable for the embryo. Further support for the inhibition of germination due to low rates of oxygen diffusion to the embryo comes from experiments in which a portion of the embryo cover is removed or the covers are pricked with a pin. In these cases, germination percentages have been increased (Atwood, 1914; Black and Wareing, 1959; Brown and van Staden, 1973; Prob-ert etal., 1985; Hatterman-Valenti etaL, 1996), suppos­edly because oxygen supply to the embryo was in­creased. Also, increasing the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere surrounding seeds may increase germi­nation percentages (Atwood, 1914; Edwards, 1968a; Gay et al, 1991).

However, several pieces of evidence suggest that lack of germination in some species with nondeep PD is not due to low rates of oxygen diffusion into seeds. (1) Seed coat permeability to oxygen did not increase as seeds of Xanthium pensylvanicum came out of dormancy (Porter and Wareing, 1974). (2) Oxygen diffuses to both the upper and the lower seed in the dispersal unit (bur) of X, pensylvanicum at a greater rate than it is used by the embryo. Thus, oxygen could not be the limiting factor for germination (Porter and Wareing, 1974). (3) Rates of oxygen consumption were the same in dor­mant and nondormant seeds of Phacelia tanacetifolia (Chen, 1970). (4) Although G A stimulated high percent­ages of dormant Sinapis arvensis seeds to germinate, embryo covers remained highly resistant to the diffusion of oxygen (Edwards, 1968a). (5) If the hole cut in seed coats of imbibed caryopsis of Avena fatua was covered with wet paper (to minimize oxygen uptake), germina­tion rates increased (Hsiao et ai, 1983). (6) The removal of husks (palea and lemma) from freshly matured seeds of Japonica cultivars of Oryza sativa decreased germina­tion. Further, germination of freshly matured dehusked seeds of these cultivars decreased with an increase in oxygen from 0 to 50%. However, after seeds had lost dormancy in dry storage, dehusking did not inhibit ger­mination (Takahashi, 1985).

ft. Covering Structures: Inhibitors

Embryo covers may (1) prevent leaching of inhibitors from embryos; (2) retard the entrance of oxygen, which can oxidize (inactivate) (Wareing and Foda, 1957; Black and Wareing, 1959) or prevent production of inhibitors (Edwards, 1968b, 1969); and (3) contain growth inhibi­tors (Witcombe et al., 1969). Unfortunately, these hypotheses are difficult to address experimentally be­cause the tolerance of embryos to inhibitors may change as physiological dormancy is broken. For example, seed coats from both dormant and nondormant seeds of 5/-napis arvensis soaked in water yielded an inhibitor that prevented the growth of embryos excised from dormant seeds of this species, but embryos from dormant seeds grew less than those from nondormant seeds in test solutions derived from either dormant or nondormant seeds (Witcombe et al, 1969). That is, after seed dor­mancy is broken, the inhibitor is present in the seed coats, but the embryo is insensitive to it.

c. Physical Restriction and Embryo Growth Potential

Another possible explanation for inhibitory effects of embryo covers on germination of seeds is that they mechanically restrict embryo growth. The force re­quired to break seed coats ranges from 9.9 MPa in Pan­cratium maritimum to 133.2 MPa in Iris lorteti (Blumen-thal et ai, 1986). Thus, germination may be inhibited

Page 5: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy

because embryos lack a sufficient growth potential to break open seed coats or other structures (Khan and Saminy, 1982). Germination of embryos excised from Setaria faberi seeds depended on the stage of embryo development and tissues left in association with them (Dekker et al, 1996). For example, the presence of cary-opsis tissue inhibited germination (relative to excised embryos) in 85% of seeds 8 days after anthesis, but it inhibited germination in only 35% of seeds 12 days after anthesis (Dekker et al, 1996).

If seeds are placed under appropriate dormancy-breaking and/or germination conditions, the growth po­tential of the embryo increases and germination occurs. Esashi and Leopold (1968) measured the physical thrust generated by dormant and nondormant seeds of Xan-thiiim pensylvanicum and found that nondormant ones developed twice the thrust of dormant ones. Depending on the species, cold stratification (Carpita et al.y 1983), GA (Baskin and Baskin, 1971b), incubation tempera­tures (Junttila, 1973), light (Scheibe and Lang, 1965), or darkness (Chen, 1968) may increase the growth po­tential of the embryo enough for the radicle to push through the seed coat and thus for seeds to germinate.

One way to study the growth potential of embryos is to place excised embryos in osmotica. If the osmotic potential of the solution is greater than the growth po­tential of the embryo, germination does not occur. How­ever, if the osmotic potential is equal to or less than the growth potential of the embryo, germination occurs. In negatively photoblastic seeds of Phacelia tanacetifolia (Chen and Thimann, 1966) and Nemophila insignis (Chen, 1968), the inhibitory effect of light on the germi­nation of nondormant seeds was overcome if the endo­sperm was removed from the tip of the radicle. How­ever, if seeds were placed in a solution with a high osmotic potential after a piece of the endosperm was removed, the dark requirement for germination was reinstated. Scarification of positively photoblastic seeds of cucumber and sunflower resulted in about a 50% increase in germination in light at 2 2 ^ in 0.45 M (1.13 MPa) and 0.3 M (0.75 MPa) mannitol solutions, respectively, indicating that removal of the mechanical constraint allowed seeds to germinate at an increased osmotic potential (McDonough, 1967).

Exposure of half seeds, i.e., embryonic axis and part of the cotyledons (Scheibe and Lang, 1965), and excised embryos (Carpita et ai, 1979) of Lactiica sativa to red light increased growth potential, whereas far-red light decreased it in both half seeds and embryos. Embryos in Lycopersicon esculentiim seeds did not show a de­crease in growth potential after exposure to far-red light if endosperm over the tip of the radicle was removed (Nomaguchi et al, 1995). To obtain 50% germination in seeds of L. sativa incubated in NaCl solutions, the

duration of exposure to red irradiation had to be in­creased with each increase in NaCl concentration (Scorer et al, 1985). Thus, additional red light had to be given to increase the growth potential of the embryo enough to overcome the osmotic potential of the NaCl solution.

Nabors and Lang (1971) used gravimetric techniques to determine the water potential of embryos germinat­ing in osmotica. Lactuca sativa embryos exposed to red light developed lower water potentials and thus imbibed more water (equals an increase in growth potential) than those kept in darkness. The difference between the water potential of embryos treated with red light and that of embryos kept in darkness was equal to the osmotic potential of a 0.3 M (0.75 MPa) mannitol solu­tion. Further, the force (in terms of osmotic potential) required for a radicle to break through the seed coats was equal to that of a 0.16 M (0.4 MPa) to 0.38 M (0.95 N4Pa) mannitol solution. Thus, seeds germinated in red light but not in darkness. The reason for this is that the growth potential of embryos in seeds exposed to red light increased enough to overcome the inhibiting force of the seed coats, whereas those in darkness did not (Nabors and Lang, 1971). In another study, the restraining force of seed coats in lettuce seeds was esti­mated to be equal to that of a 0.4 M (1.0 MPa) mannitol solution (Takeba and Matsubara, 1979).

d. Changes in Embryo-Covering Structures

As seeds come out of dormancy and/or when environ­mental conditions become favorable for germination, do embryo covers become less resistent to penetration by the radicle? Not much is known about the effects of dormancy-breaking treatments on changes in the resis­tance of endosperm, seed coats, or other structures to penetration by the radicle.

The force required to punch a hole in the megagamet-ophyte/nucellus isolated from dormant and nondormant seeds of Picea glauca was not significantly different. However, when dormant and nondormant seeds were given 21 days of cold stratification, the force required to puncture the megagametophyte/nucellus decreased significantly in both types of seeds (Downie and Bewley, 1996). Resistance of the endosperm remained the same when Syringa reflexa seeds were exposed to low (dor­mancy breaking) or high (dormancy inducing) tempera­tures. However, if nondormant seeds were placed at favorable germination temperatures, resistance of the endosperm declined just before the radicle emerged (Junttila, 1973).

Endosperm rather than seed coats is the main force restricting embryo growth and thus germination in some species (e.g.. Brown and Bridglall, 1987). In Olea euro-paea, removal of the woody endocarp of the fruit did

Page 6: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

32 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

not promote germination, and embryos did not grow until they were excised from the endosperm (Mitrakos and Diamantoglou, 1984). Studies on several species discussed later indicate that endosperm (and sometimes seed coat) resistance declines just before germination occurs. However, seeds of these species did not require either warm or cold stratification or afterripening before they would germinate; thus, we must conclude that these studies on changes in resistance were done on nondor-mant seeds. That is, germination occurred as soon as seeds were placed under appropriate environmental conditions, depending on the species.

Resistance has been shown to vary depending on the temperature and light: dark conditions under which seeds were imbibed. Endosperm resistance to radicle emergence decreased faster if Capsicum annuum seeds were imbibed at 25°C than if they were imbibed at IS' C (Watkins and Cantliffe, 1983b). Also, the force needed to fracture the seed coat of Onopordum nervosum de­creased as the imbibition period increased, and resis­tance decreased faster at 25 than at 15°C; germination percentages were higher at 25 than at 15°C (Perez-Garcia and Pita, 1989). Light and GA caused decreases in the puncture resistance of endosperm in Lactuca sal­iva seeds (Tao and Khan, 1979). Mobilization of storage materials and vacuolation of the cytoplasm occurred in cells of L. sativa endosperm adjacent to the radicular end of the embryo under appropriate light-dark, tem­perature, and osmotic conditions for germination. These changes did not occur in endosperm cells when condi­tions were unsuitable for germination (Georghiou et al, 1983).

Much research has been done in attempting to under­stand how the endosperm becomes less restrictive to radicle growth during germination (Black, 1996). Endo­sperm breakdown did not occur in Capsicum annuum seeds until 1 day before germination occurred. This ac­tivity was concentrated in the area of the endosperm covering the radicle and was promoted by GA (Watkins et ai, 1985). Breakdown of endosperm at the tip of the radicle also preceded germination in Lycopersicon esculentum seeds, and GA was required. Further, seeds of a GA-deficient dwarf-mutant line gal of L. esculen­tum did not germinate unless GA was supplied or if endosperm at the radicle tip was removed (Groot and Karssen, 1987). When endosperm from seeds of the GA-deficient gib\ mutant of L. esculentum was treated with GA, the production of endo-)8-mannanase was induced and activities of mannohydrolase and a-galactosidase increased (Groot et al., 1988). Galactomannan-hydrolyzing enzymes were active in endosperm at the radicle tip of L. esculentum seeds 1 day prior to germina­tion and in the remainder of the endosperm after germi­nation had occurred (Nomaguchi etai, 1995). The abil­

ity of seeds of this species to germinate at 12°C was correlated with the presence of endomannanase activity in endosperm at the radicle tip (Leviatov et ai, 1995). Subsequent studies showed that endo-jS-mannanase is present only in endosperm cells adjacent to the radicular end of the embryo (Nonogaki and Morohashi, 1996). In developing seeds, however, various isoforms of this enzyme are present in the embryo and also in the endo­sperm adjacent to the cotyledons (Voigt and Bewley, 1996).

Exposure to red light promoted the germination of Datura ferox seeds by increasing the growth potential of the embryo and softening the endosperm. However, increases in growth potential of the embryo were not enough to promote germination unless endosperm soft­ening also occurred (de Miguel and Sanchez, 1992). Cellulase activity increased in D. ferox seeds prior to germination, and this was correlated with softening of the endosperm over the radicle. The peak of cellulase activity occurred 36 hr after the red-light treatment, and far-red light given 15 and 24 hr after the red light decreased cellulase activity to near that of dark controls (Sanchez et ai, 1986). In addition, walls of endosperm cells in the region over the radicle were softened in D, ferox and D. stramonium seeds due to a decrease in 4-linked mannose, which is one of the primary cell wall constituents; the enzyme was not specified (Sanchez et ai, 1990).

Rupture of the seed coat in Nicotiana tabacum seeds began after 30 hr of imbibition in light, which was fol­lowed by an increase in the activity of )8-l,3-glucanase, especially in the micropylar region where the radicle emerges. An increase in j3-l,3-glucanase activity was correlated with emergence of the radicle from the endo­sperm, suggesting that this enzyme was involved in soft­ening the endosperm (Leubner-Metzger et ai, 1995).

One of the conclusions from studies on endosperm softening is that this process is very sensitive to environ­mental factors, i.e., seeds must be imbibed and subjected to appropriate temperature and light:dark conditions for germination before enzymes in the portion of the endosperm over the radicle are synthesized and/or acti­vated. Thus, studies on endosperm softening have con­tributed greatly to understanding the process of germi­nation per se in nondormant seeds.

e. Interaction between Embryo and Covering Structures

The next challenge is to understand why freshly ma­tured seeds of many species will not germinate under a certain set of environmental conditions, but germinate to high percentages at the same set of test conditions after they have received a dormancy-breaking treat­ment. What has changed? Do dormancy-breaking treat-

Page 7: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 33

ments cause changes in the endosperm? In seeds that lack endosperm, do dormancy-breaking treatments cause changes in the seed coats and/or other structures? Do dormancy-breaking treatments cause changes in the embryo? What effect does the embryo in dormant vs nondormant seeds have on its covering structures?

Is it possible that one of the results of dormancy-breaking treatments in some seeds, especially those with endosperm, is the production of some kind of signal (chemical?) by the embryo? Jacobsen et al. (1976) sug­gested that GA was released by the growing embryo in Apium graveolens seeds and that it stimulated the production of hydrolases in the endosperm. Subse­quently, hydrolases broke down much of the endosperm before germination occurred. Application of GA to en­dosperm from A. graveolens seeds caused cell separation (Jacobsen et al, 1976). However, if the softening of covering layers is ultimately controlled by the embryo, it is doubtful that GA is the only signal. In fact, endo-/3-mannanase activity in endosperm at the radicle tip in Lycopersicon esculentiim seeds is not induced by GA (Toorop et al, 1996).

Other possible roles of the embryo might be to (1) remove or absorb products of enzyme hydrolysis that inhibit enzyme activity if present in high concentrations (Spyropoulos and Reid, 1985; Zambou and Spyro-poulos, 1990) and/or (2) regulate inhibitors in the endo­sperm, e.g., saponin-like substances that affect the pro­duction of a-galactosidase (Zambou et al, 1993). Also, after endosperm softening has occurred in Lycopersicon esculentum seeds, germination does not occur unless the embryo generates enough growth potential to overcome resistance of the seed coats (Hilhorst and Downie, 1995).

Some hydrolytic reactions occur in endosperm tissue after it is separated from the embryo, e.g., endo-)8-mannanase was active in isolated imbibed endosperm from the legumes Trigonella foenumgraecum (Reid and Davies, 1977; Kontos et al, 1996) and Ceratonia siliqua (Kontos et al, 1996). This observation suggests another reason why the embryo may be involved in controlling germination. If hydrolytic enzymes in the endosperm were not controlled by the embryo, what would prevent all seeds with endosperm from germinating as soon as they are imbibed under temperature and light: dark con­ditions suitable for germination? It generally is recog­nized that dormancy-breaking treatments are needed to promote the germination of many seeds with endo­sperm.

It seems reasonable that although embryos excised from seeds with nondeep PD grow normally, they prob­ably are involved in controlling germination of intact seeds. Some possible roles of the embryo have been mentioned earlier. The assumption that embryos help

control germination is based on the facts that (1) many seeds with nondeep PD require dormancy-breaking treatments before they will germinate (Chapter 4) and (2) dormancy-breaking treatments per se do not seem to have much effect on covering structures. That is, the force required to break covering structures is about the same in dormant and nondormant seeds, especially if nondormant seeds are under unfavorable conditions for germination (Junttila, 1973). The resistance of endo­sperm changes when nondormant seeds are under favor­able germination conditions (Watkins and Cantliffe, 1983; Georghiou et al, 1983). The exact cause of non-deep PD probably varies, depending on the species and the type of structures covering the embryo. In seeds of many species, however, an interaction between the embryo and its covering structures may be the best ex­planation for the cause of nondeep PD. Future studies on the role of the endosperm in controlling germination will need to take into account the fact that Cranston et al (1996) concluded that wound-induced ethylene synthesis may promote the growth of embryos excised from dormancy caryopses of Avena fatua,

3. Intermediate Physiological Dormancy

Examples of species whose seeds have intermediate PD include Acer negundo (Nikolaeva, 1969), A. pseudo-platanus (Pinfield and Stobart, 1972), A, saccharum (Webb and Dumbroff, 1969), Corylus avellana (Frankland and Wareing, 1966), Fagus sylvatica (Frankland and Wareing, 1966), Ferula karatavica (Ni­kolaeva, 1969), Fraxinus americana, F. pensylvanica (Steinbauer, 1937), Melampyrum lineare (Curtis and Cantlon, 1963), and Polygonum spp. (Ransom, 1935).

Embryos isolated from seeds with intermediate PD will grow and the resulting seedlings are normal (Niko­laeva, 1977). The dormancy of intact seeds or dispersal units is broken by cold stratification (Nikolaeva, 1969), but up to 6 months of this dormancy-breaking treatment may be required (Choate, 1940), depending on the spe­cies. Dry storage at room temperatures reduces the length of the cold stratification treatment needed to break dormancy in various species, including Amelan-chier canadensis (Crocker and Barton, 1931), Echino-cystis lobata (Choate, 1940), Polygonum spp. (Ransom, 1935), Talinum calcaricum (Ware and Quarterman, 1969), and Vitis bicolor (Flemion, 1937).

GA substituted for the cold stratification require­ment for dormancy break in seeds of various species, including Polygonum convolvulus (Timson, 1966) and Stachys alpina (Pinfield et al, 1972). Although GA did not promote the germination of intact nuts of Corylus avellana or Fagus sylvatica, it caused dormant seeds of these species to germinate after the pericarp was

Page 8: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

34 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

removed. Thiourea and kinetin also stimulated excised seeds of C avellana and F. sylvatica to germinate, but they inhibited root growth (Frankland and Wareing, 1966). GA had no effect on the germination of intact samaras of Acer pseudoplatanus, but kinetin induced 45% of the seeds to germinate (Pinfield and Stobart, 1972). Intact samaras of A. saccharum did not respond to GA or kinetin. However, both GA and kinetin de­creased the cold stratification requirement for germina­tion when samara walls were removed and the seed coat was pricked with a pin (Webb and Dumbroff, 1969). In Melampyrum lineare, GA substituted for the period of dry storage at room temperatures that must precede cold stratification (Curtis and Cantlon, 1963).

4. Deep Physiological Dormancy

Examples of species whose seeds have deep PD in­clude Impatiens parviflora (Nikolaeva, 1969), Malus do-mestica (Harrington and Hite, 1923), Sorbus aucuparia (Flemion, 1931), Rhodotypos kerrioides (Flemion, \933di,h),Prunuspersica, Crataegus sp. (Flemion, 1934), Acer tartaricurriy Euonymous europaea, and Acer plat-anoides (Pinfield et al, 1974).

Embryos isolated from seeds with deep PD either do not grow or they produce abnormal seedlings (Niko­laeva, 1977). The only treatment that overcomes the dormancy of intact seeds (or dispersal units) is a rela­tively long period of cold stratification. The length of the cold stratification period required to break dormancy varies from 7 weeks in Acer platanoides (Pinfield et al, 1974) to 14 weeks in Prunus persica (Crocker and Barton, 1931) to 18 weeks in Impatiens parviflora (Niko­laeva, 1969). Dry storage at room temperature prior to cold stratification increased germination percentages of Euonymous europaea seeds, but it did not decrease the length of the cold stratification period required to break dormancy (Nikolaeva, 1969).

Although GA stimulates the germination of seeds with nondeep and intermediate PD, it does not break deep PD in intact dispersal units (Nikolaeva et ai, 1973; Nikolaeva, 1977). In some species, GA stimulated the growth of embryos excised from seeds with deep PD, e.g., Malus arnoldiana (Barton, 1956), Prunus persica (Gray, 1958), and Euonymous europaea (Singh, 1985), but in others such as Acer platanoides (Pinfield et ai, 1974) it did not. Although GA stimulated the growth of excised embryos of Euonymous europaea, it did not cause intact seeds to germinate. Germination of E. euro­paea occurs in two phases. The first phase requires rela­tively high (9-10°C) temperatures, and the embryo en­larges and splits the seed coat. The second phase requires cold stratification at 0~3°C for several weeks, and then the radicle emerges at 0~3''C. GA substitutes

for the first but not the second phase of germination (Nikolaeva et a/., 1973).

Kinetin also has been used in attempts to break deep PD, but usually it is ineffective unless used with GA or cold stratification. Neither kinetin nor GA broke the dormancy of Acer tartaricum seeds at 20°C; however, kinetin or GA plus kinetin enhanced the dormancy break during cold stratification. In Euonymous euro­paea, neither kinetin nor GA stimulated germination, but when used together 50% of the seeds at 9-10**C germinated after a 2-month period (Nikolaeva et al., 1973).

In a number of species, especially certain members of the Rosaceae, the removal of embryos from seeds that have not been cold stratified results in abnormal, slow-growing plants (Flemion, 1933a, 1934; Nikolaeva, 1969). These plants are dwarfs with very short in-temodes and small, malformed leaves, and sometimes they have a whorl or rosette of leaves at the tip of the shoot (called a "perched rosette") (Tukey and Carlson, 1945). Production of dwarf plants from seeds that have not been cold stratified is called nanism. The dwarf condition of these plants is long persisting; a dwarfed peach seedling kept in a warm greenhouse for 10 years (and maybe longer) never grew normally (Flemion, 1959).

Under high temperatures and continuous light, lat­eral buds of dwarf plants may initiate growth and pro­duce normal branches (Lammerts, 1943); however, growth produced by the terminal bud is not normal (Flemion, 1959). One way to stimulate dwarf plants to grow normally is to give them a cold treatment at about 5''C for 4-8 weeks (Tukey and Carlson, 1945; Flemion, 1959). GA was effective in overcoming the dwarf condi­tion in Malus arnoldiana (Barton, 1956), Prunus persica, apricot (P. armeniaca), plum (P. domestica ?) (Blom-maert and Hurter, 1959), and Rhodotypos kerrioides (Flemion, 1959), but it had no stimulatory effects on dwarfs of Euonymous europaea (Nikolaeva, 1969). However, plants of Rhodotypos kerrioides started pro­ducing short intemodes again when GA treatments were discontinued (Flemion, 1959).

With grafting studies, Flemion and Waterbury (1945) showed that the shoot and not the root of a dwarf plant is dormant. Because cold stratification is required for the germination of seeds with deep PD, this raises a question that has not been answered: Is it necessary to cold stratify the whole seed or only the plumule (shoot) to break deep PD?

B. Morphological Dormancy

At the time of dispersal, seeds of some species have embryos in which a radicle and cotyledon(s) can be

Page 9: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 35

distinguished, i.e., the embryo is differentiated, but it is not fully grown (underdeveloped). Thus, embryo growth is required before germination occurs. In seeds of other species, the embryo is just a mass of cells at the time of dispersal, i.e., the embryo is not differenti­ated, and germination does not take place until both differentiation and growth occur. In both types of seeds, germination is prevented at the time of maturity due to morphological characteristics of the embryo, hence the term morphological dormancy.

!• Differentiated Embryos

Morphological dormancy occurs in seeds with rudi­mentary and Hnear embryos (see Table 3.2). Most of the interior of these relatively large seeds is occupied

by endosperm, and the embryo may be only 1.0% of the size (volume) of the seed, or less (Nikolaeva, 1969). Although rudimentary and linear embryos are differen­tiated, they frequently are referred to collectively as underdeveloped embryos (Grushvitzky, 1967). These embryos are underdeveloped in the sense that they are small and consequently have to grow before the seeds can germinate. Underdeveloped embryos occur in a number of plant families (Table 3.3), and Martin (1946) placed seeds with rudimentary embryos at the base of a family tree of seed phylogeny; those with linear em­bryos are higher on the tree than those with rudimen­tary embryos.

Growth of underdeveloped embryos takes place after seeds have been dispersed from the mother plant. Re­quirements for growth are a moist substrate and suitable

TABLE 3.3 Plant Families in Which One to Many Species Has (Have) Seeds with Rudimentaiy or Linear Embryo{s)''

Family Primary region of geographical distribution^ Family Primary region of geographical distribution^

Amaryllidaceae

Amborellaceae

Annonaceae

Apiaceae

Aquifoliaceae

Araceae

Araliaceae

Arecaceae

Aristolochiaceae

Berberidaceae

Buxaceae

Canetlaceae

Cannaceae

Caprifoliaceae

Chloranthaceae

Convallariaceae

Cycadaceae

Daphniphyllaceae

Degeneriaceae

Dilleniaceae

Escalloniaceae

Eupomatiaceae

Fumariaceae

Garrayaceae

Ginkgoaceae

Grossulariaceae

Haemodoraceae

Hydrophyllaceae

Tropical or subtropical

Tropical

Tropical (especially Old World)

Northern temperate

Tropical and temperate

Tropical and temperate

Tropical

Tropical and subtropical

Tropical and warm temperate

Northern temperature and tropical mountains

Tropical and temperate

Tropical

Tropical

Northern temperate and tropical mountains

Tropical and subtropical

Temperate

Tropical

Tropical

Tropical

Tropical and subtropical

Southern temperate

Tropical

Northern temperate

Warm temperate

Temperate

Temperate

Temperate and tropical

Cosmopolitan, except Austraha

Illiciaceae

Iridaceae

Lactoridaceae

Lardizabalaceae

Loranthaceae

Liliaceae

Magnoliaceae

Melanthaceae

Menyanthaceae

Monimiaceae

Myristicaceae

Nandinaceae

Oleaceae

Paeoniaceae

Papaveraceae

Piperaceae

Pittosporaceae

Podocarpaceae

Ranunculaceae

Santalaceae

Sarraceniaceae

Schisandraceae

Smilacaceae

Stylidiaceae

Taxaceae

Trochodendraceae

Winteraceae

Tropical

Tropical and temperate

Tropical

Temperate

Tropical and temperate

Warm temperate and tropical

Temperate and tropical

Warm temperate and tropical

Temperate and boreal

Southern tropical

Tropical

Northern temperate

Temperate and tropical

Northern temperate

Northern temperate

Tropical

Tropical

Southern temperate

Northern temperate

Tropical and temperate

Temperate and tropical

Temperate and tropical

Tropical and temperate

Southern temperate

Temperate and tropical

Northern temperate

Tropical

"" From Martin (1946), Grushvitzky (1961, 1967), Corner (1976), and Zomlefer (1994). ^ Information from Willis (1966).

Page 10: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

36 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

temperatures, and some species have specific light: dark requirements. For many species with morphological dormancy, optimum temperatures for embryo growth and germination are from 15 to 30°C (Grushvitzky, 1967; Lush et al, 1984; Lohotska and Moravcova, 1989; Baskin and Baskin, 1986b), but those of the oil palm, Elaeis guineensis, germinate best at temperatures of 35-40°C, depending on the variety (Hussey, 1958). Seeds of Apium graveolens require light for germination (Press­man et aly 1977; Jacobsen and Pressman, 1979), those of Conium maculatum germinate to higher percentages in light than in darkness (Baskin and Baskin, 1990a), those of the cultivated de Caen type of Anemone cow-naria germinate faster and to higher percentages in darkness than in light (Bullowa et al, 1975), and those of Pulsatilla slavica germinate equally well in light and darkness (Lhotska and Moravcova, 1989). When mor­phologically dormant seeds are placed under favorable conditions, the time required for 50% of them to germi­nate varies from 6 days in Apium graveolens (Jacobsen and Pressman, 1979) to 3.5 to 5.5 months in E. guin-eensiSy depending on the variety (Hussey, 1958).

GA increased germination percentages of Anemone coronaria (de Caen type) seeds at supraoptimum (25°C) but not at optimum (10-20°C) temperatures (Bullowa et al., 1975). Also, GA increased the rate but not the final percentage of germination of Clematis microphylla seeds (Lush et al, 1984).

Underdeveloped embryos occur in seeds of a number of families that primarily are tropical in distribution, including the Annonaceae, Arecaceae, Degeneriaceae, Lactoridaceae, Monimiaceae, Myristicaceae, and Win-teraceae (Grushvitzky, 1967). Under tropical condi­tions, underdeveloped embryos grow slowly after seeds are dispersed, and the seeds eventually germinate (Grushvitzky, 1967). If any physiological dormancy is associated with the morphological dormancy in these seeds, it has not been reported. However, physiological dormancy in association with morphological dormancy may help explain the germination of Elaeis guineensis. Seeds of the oil palm varieties dura and tenera held at 39.5°C for 100 days germinated to a maximum of 42 and 53%, respectively, whereas those given 50 or more days at 39.5*'C and then moved to room temperatures (28°C) germinated to 64-90 and 60-88%, respectively. A room temperature control was not used, but dura and tenera seeds receiving 10 days at 39.5°C prior to being placed at 28°C germinated to only 1 and 0%, respectively (Rees, 1959). An increase in germination percentages of seeds of both varieties at 28°C following warm stratification at 39.5°C suggests that some seeds have physiological dormancy (which was broken at 39.5°C) in addition to morphological dormancy (which was broken at 28°C).

Seeds of some tropical species with morphological dormancy placed under appropriate conditions for em­bryo growth and germination require 1-3 months to germinate, e.g., Annona squamosa (Hayat, 1963) and A. crassiflora (Rizzini, 1973). More studies are needed to determine if these seeds require warm stratification to break physiological dormancy before morphological dormancy is broken (i.e., embryo growth). However, physiological dormancy may be lacking, in which case embryo growth is very slow in seeds of these species. Studies to monitor the rates of embryo growth during the 1- to 3-month period required for germination would be very informative.

Underdeveloped embryos occur in many plant fami­lies in temperate regions; however, in most cases mor­phological dormancy is associated with physiological dormancy. Morphological dormancy per se has been documented in only two temperate families: Apiaceae and Ranunculaceae. In the Apiaceae, studies on mor­phological dormancy have been done on seeds of Apium graveolens (Jacobsen and Pressman, 1979), Conium maculatum (Baskin and Baskin, 1990a), and Pastinaca sativa (Baskin and Baskin, 1979) and in the Ranuncula­ceae on seeds of the de Caen type of Anemone coronaria (Bullowa etal, 1975), Isopyrum biternatum (Baskin and Baskin, 1986b), and Pulsatilla slavica (Lhotska and Mor­avcova, 1989). It should be noted that seeds of the culti­vated de Caen type of Anemone coronaria have mor­phological dormancy, but those of the wild type have both morphological and physiological dormancy (Horo-vitz et al, 1975).

Some seeds that have morphological dormancy when they are freshly matured can develop physiological dor­mancy if they are exposed to changes in environmental conditions. For example, morphologically dormant seeds of Conium maculatum develop physiological dor­mancy during cold stratification (Baskin and Baskin, 1990a).

2. Undifferentiated Embryos

One or more (sometimes all) genera in a number of plant families have undifferentiated embryos (Table 3.4); however, this type of embryo is found only in micro and dwarf seeds. Micro seeds are usually less than 0.2 mm in length, and dwarf seeds generally are from 0.3 to 2.0 mm in length (Martin, 1946). Embryos of micro seeds can have from 25 to 100 cells (Martin, 1946), but they may have as few as 2 (Olson, 1980). In the germination of seeds with undifferentiated embryos, a cotyledon(s) and radicle per se are not formed. Instead, either the radicular or the plumular pole of the embryo elongates and eventually emerges from the seed. The tissue that emerges from the seed enlarges to form a

Page 11: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 37

TABLE 3.4 Examples of Plant Families with Genera Whose Seeds Have Undifferentiated Embryos"

Family

Balanophoraceae Burmanniaceae Ericaceae Gentianaceae Hydnoraceae Lennoaceae Monotropaceae Orchidaceae

Orobanchaceae Pyrolaceae Rafflesiaceae

Source of nutrition

Parasitic Mycolieterotrophs Mycoheterotrophs Mycolieterotrophs Parasitic Parasitic Mycoheterotrophs Autotrophs,

Mycoheterotrophs Parasitic Mycoheterotrophs Parasitic

Type of seed

Micro? Micro Dwarf Dwarf Dwarf? Dwarf? Micro Micro

Dwarf Micro Dwarf?

Embryo size (No. of cells)

4-12 4-10 2-3 5-24

18 or more 12 or more No data 2 or more

9 9

4-10

"^ From Martin (1946), Rangaswamy (1967), Kuijt (1969), Kumar (1977), Olson (1980), and Natesh and Rau (1984).

haustorium or protocorm, depending on the species (see Chapter 11, Sections II,A and IV,A).

C. Morphophysiological Dormancy

Morphophysiological dormancy (MPD) occurs in seeds with rudimentary or linear embryos, and as the name indicates it is a combination of morphological and physiological dormancy, i.e., the underdeveloped embryos have physiological dormancy. MPD is found in a number of plant families, including the Apiaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araceae, Arahaceae, Aristolochiaceae, Berberidaceae, Fumariaceae, Illiciaceae, Lardizaba-lanceae, Liliaceae, Magnoliaceae, Papaveraceae, Ra-nunculaceae, and Schisandraceae (Grushvitzky, 1967). However, there are many families whose seeds have underdeveloped embryos (Table 3.3), but their germina­tion has not been studied. Thus, it is not known if the seeds have morphological or morphophysiological dor­mancy.

Two general kinds of things must happen before seeds with MPD can germinate: (1) the embryo must grow to a species-specific critical size and (2) physiologi­cal dormancy of the embryo must be broken. The secret to germinating seeds with MPD is to figure out what environmental conditions promote each event. In some species, embryo growth and dormancy break are pro­moted by the same environmental conditions, whereas in others they require different conditions. Depending on the species, embryo growth and dormancy break may require (1) warm (^15°C) stratification only (Baskin and Baskin, 1990b), (2) cold (0-10°C) stratifi­cation only (Baskin and Baskin, 1984d), (3) warm fol­lowed by cold stratification (Baskin and Baskin, 1984c),

or (4) cold followed by warm followed by cold stratifica­tion (Nikolaeva, 1977). In some species, embryo dor­mancy is broken and then growth occurs (Baskin and Baskin, 1984c, 1985), whereas in others dormancy break and embryo growth occur at the same time (Baskin and Baskin, 1984d). The various types of morphophysiologi­cal dormancy and how they are broken in nature will be discussed in Chapter 5.

D. Physical Dornnancy

In this type of dormancy, the primary reason for the lack of germination is the impermeability of seed (or fruit) coats to water. Physical dormancy is present in at least 15 families of angiosperms (Table 3.5); however, it would not be surprising if some members of the families Bixaceae, Melastomataceae, and Winteraceae had phys­ical dormancy. These families have a palisade layer of lignified cells in the seed coat (Vazquez-Yanes and Perez-Garcia, 1976; Corner, 1976), a characteristic fre­quently found in seeds with physical dormancy. It should be noted, however, that just because a family has seeds with physical dormancy does not mean that all of its members have this type. For example, although many genera of Fabaceae have physical dormancy, seeds in some members of several others, including Andira, Ar-achis, Bauhinia, Brownea, Castanospermumy Dialium, Inocarpus, Mora, Pentaclethra, Pithecellobium, and Sar-aca, have permeable seed coats (Corner, 1951).

Based on embryo morphology, seven types of seeds are found among the 15 families known to have mem­bers with physical dormancy (Table 3.5). With the ex­ception of the Cannaceae, Musaceae, and Nelumbona-ceae, seeds of all families that contain taxa with physical dormancy have large embryos (bent, folded, investing, or spatulate), and most of the food reserves are stored in the embryo rather than in endosperm. Seeds of the Cannaceae, Musaceae, and Nelumbonaceae have linear, capitate, and broad embryos, respectively, and much endosperm (Martin, 1946).

Seed coat impermeability usually is associated with the presence of one or more layers of impermeable palisade cells. For example, impermeable seed coats in the Fabaceae have one palisade layer (Rolston, 1978), whereas those of Cuscuta pedicellata and C. campestris (Convolvulaceae) have two palisade layers; only the inner one is impermeable (Lyshede, 1992). Imperme­able palisade layers are composed of sclereid cells that have thick lignified secondary walls. The most common type of sclereid cell in palisade layers of seeds is the macrosclereid or Malpighian cell (Esau, 1964).

In the Anacardiaceae, the seed coat is not well differ­entiated, and the embryo is protected by the fruit wall (Corner, 1976). Fruits of some members of this family

Page 12: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

38 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

TABLE 3.5 Plant Families In Which at Least Some Members Have Seeds with Physical Domnancy*

Family Seed type^ Specialized structure Reference

Anacardiaceae Bombacaceae Cannaceae

Cistaceae

Convolvulaceae Curcurbitaceae

Fabaceae Caesalpinoideae Mimosoideae Papilionoideae

Geraniaceae Malvaceae Musaceae

Nelumbonaceae Rhamnaceae Sapindaceae Sterculiaceae

Tiliaceae

Bent Spatulate Linear Bent

Folded

Spatulate

Investing Investing Bent Folded Folded Capitate

Broad Investing

Folded

Spatulate

Folded

Operculum; endocarp slit Micropyle?*

Lid on raphe Chalazal plug

Plug near micropyle Micropyle?^

Hilum Strophiole Strophiole

Hilum? Chalazal plug

Micropylar lid-like structure

Protuberance d

d

d

d

von Teichman and Robbertse (1986a,b)

Grootjen and Bouman (1988) Thanos and Georghiou (1988), Corral et al (1989)

KoUer and Cohn (1959)

Jones and Geneve (1995) Cavanagh (1980), Dell (1980), Hanna (1984), Serrato-Valenti et al. (1995) Hagon and Ballard (1970), Rolston (1978), Manning and van Staden (1987)

Christiansen and Moore (1959), Winter (1960), Egley et al (1986)

Boesewinkel and Bouman (1984), Graven et al. (1996)

Ohga (1926)

^ Seed type and specialized structure on seed (or fruit) coat where water enters is given for each family, if known. ^ Seed type information from Martin (1946). ^ The opening is our speculation based on examination of drawings or photographs of longitudinal sections of seeds. ^ No data available.

have physical dormancy because the endocarp layer of the pericarp is impermeable to water. The endocarp of Rhus lancea fruits consists of four layers: macrosclereids, osteosclereids, brachysclereids, and crystal cells (von Teichman and Robbertse, 1986a; von Teichman, 1989). The pericarp wall of Nelumbo nucifera (Nelumbona­ceae) has a middle sclerenchymatous layer composed of macrosclereids (Ohga, 1926).

When macrosclereids are viewed under a microscope, a line appears to be running across them; this is called the light line (Rolston, 1978; Kumar and Singh, 1991). According to Rolston (1978), a line is seen at the same place in each macrosclereid, giving the impression of a continuous line. The Ught line is due to differences in refraction of light by the top and bottom portions of each cell, which differ somewhat in chemical composition.

Macrosclereids are impermeable to water because they are impregnated with water-repellent substances, including cutin, lignin, quinones, pectic-insoluble mate­rials, suberin, and wax (Rolston, 1978; Werker, 1980-1981). High concentrations of a water-repellent sub­stance called callose in the light line also may contribute to seed coat impermeability (Serrato-Valenti etal., 1993, 1994). For example, seed coat impermeabihty in the legume Stylosanthes scabra was attributed to the pres­

ence of phenolics, callose, and hydrophobic lipid sub­stances in the palisade layer and to a high concentration of callose in the light-line region (Serrato-Valenti et al, 1993).

Seed impermeability in Cercis siliquastrum is attrib­uted to total imperviousness of the hilum, a cuticle layer composed of lipids and pectins, a lipid layer between the integument and the endosperm, and water-repellent palisade and hypodermal cells (Riggio-Bevilacqua etal, 1985). The water barrier in seeds of Prosopis tamarugo is hydrophobic materials (lipids) located in the superficial portion of palisade cells (Valenti et al, 1986).

Impermeable seed coats develop in Pisum elatius dur­ing seed dehydration. As the dehydration process be­gins, catechol oxidase increases eightfold in the seed coats, but it decreases as seeds reach their final dry weight (Marbach and Mayer, 1975). These authors sug­gest that catechol oxidase plays a role in melanin forma­tion and tanning reactions, which are correlated with the development of seed coat impermeability.

In addition to the development of impermeable lay­ers in the seed (or fruit) coats, all the natural seed openings, including the micropyle, hilum, and chalazal area, also become impermeable to water. For example, the hilum region in legume seeds has an additional layer

Page 13: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 39

of macrosclereids, called the counter palisade (Sanchez-Yelamo et ai, 1992). Before seeds can germinate, how­ever, an opening or passage through the palisade or other impermeable layer(s) must be formed, whereby water enters the seed. The type of opening through the impermeable layers varies with the plant family. In the Cistaceae and Malvaceae families, water enters after the chalazal plug is disrupted (Fig. 3.2a), and in the Convolvulaceae family there is a plug-like structure near the micropyle (Table 3.5). In seeds of the Papilionoideae and Mimosoideae, the site of water entry is the strophi-ole (Fig. 3.2b), which is a swelling on the raphe of the seed coat between the hilum and chalaza (Table 3.5). Seeds of the Cannaceae have an "imbibition lid" on the raphe, and the micropyle of Musaceae seeds develops into a lid-like structure called the operculum (Fig. 3.2c) that "pops out" prior to germination. Ohga (1926) sug­gested that the most likely site of water entry into fruits of Nelumbonaceae was the protuberance on the stylar end. The specialized structures listed in Table 3.5 for Bombacaceae, Curcubitaceae, and Geraniaceae are only speculations, and thus much work is needed to

explain how physical dormancy is broken in these fami­lies. For four families, insufficient information is avail­able to be able to speculate on the type of opening that permits water entry. Chapter 6 will consider the environmental factors that cause removal or displace­ment of the plugs or coverings of these natural openings.

E. Physical plus Physiological Dormancy

In the majority of species with impermeable seed coats, the embryo is nondormant, but there are some species whose seeds have impermeable coats and dor­mant embryos (see Table 6.10). The presence of physical and physiological dormancy in a single seed sometimes is referred to as combined dormancy (Nikolaeva, 1969), and germination does not occur until both types have been broken. In some species, physical dormancy is broken before physiological dormancy (e.g.. Barton, 1934), but in others physiological dormancy is broken before physical dormancy (e.g., McKeon and Mott, 1984). For a discussion of germination of seeds with physical and physiological dormancy, see Chapter 6, Section VII.

Impermeable layer

chalazal cap

strophiole

/ endosperm /#—impermeable

A embryo JM layer

operculum

impermeable layer

FIGURE 3.2 Water-impermeable layer of the seed coat, embryo, endosperm, and specialized structure on seed coat (chalazal cap, strophiole, or operculum) that moves or becomes dislodged, allowing entry of water: (a) Malvaceae, chalazal cap; (b) Fabaceae (Mimo­soideae and Papilionoideae), strophiole; and (c) Musaceae, opercu­lum. Musaceae drawing is with permission of Graven et al. (1996).

F. Chemical Dormancy

1. Description

According to Nikolaeva (1969,1977), chemically dor­mant seeds do not germinate due to the presence of inhibitors in the pericarp. Further, chemical dormancy is broken by removal of the pericarp or leaching of the fruits. This definition of chemical dormancy has been broadened to include compounds that are either pro­duced in or translocated to the seed, where they block embryo growth. Numerous studies have demonstrated that germination in petri dishes is inhibited by a variety of compounds found in many plant families (Evenari, 1949; Ketring, 1973). However, it is quite a different task to show that these compounds are translocated to seeds prior to dispersal and that they prevent embryo growth and germination.

Much attention has been devoted to trying to find germination inhibitors in mature seeds. In the early days of studies on chemical dormancy, extracts of whole seeds frequently were made. These extracts were chromato-graphed, and the resulting fractions were tested on seeds of Lactuca sativay Triticurriy Lepidiurriy and other species to determine if they inhibited germination (see review by Wareing, 1965). From these studies there was no way to know if the inhibitor (1) came from the embryo and/ or other seed parts or (2) would prevent embryo growth of nondormant seeds of the species from which it was ex­tracted.

Page 14: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

40 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

Germination inhibitors have been found in the em­bryo, endosperm, and seed coats of seeds and in struc­tures that sometimes are dispersed along with the seeds of some species. Lists of inhibitory compounds and the seed parts in which they occur are given by Bewley and Black (1982,1994) and Bradbeer (1988). Unfortunately, in many of the studies in which the location of the inhibitor was determined, the investigator used seeds of Lactuca, Triticum, or other cultivated species in the bioassay rather than nondormant seeds of the species from which the compound was extracted. However, in­hibitors isolated from embryos of dormant Acerpseudo-platanus seeds inhibited the germination of nondormant seeds of this species (Webb and Wareing, 1972), and extracts of dormant Fraxinus excelsior embryos inhib­ited the growth of nondormant embryos (Nikolaeva and Vorob'eva, 1979). Leachate from seeds of Lactuca sativa induced into dormancy by high temperatures reduced the germination of nondormant seeds of this species (Small and Gutterman, 1991).

Using Bewley and Black's (1982, 1994) and Brad-beer's (1988) lists of species whose seeds have germina­tion inhibitors, it appears that inhibitors are found in species with all types of seeds, except broad, capitate, dwarf, and micro. However, the absence of reports of inhibitors in these types of seeds could be due to lack of studies rather than to lack of inhibitors per se.

A complication in the study of chemical dormancy is that most seeds from which germination inhibitors have been isolated also exhibit physiological dormancy (e.g., Steinbauer, 1937; Webb and Dumbroff, 1969). Fur­ther, when physiological dormancy is broken, there is no evidence that chemicals in the seed prevent germination. For example, leachates from dormant achenes of Rosa rugosa inhibited the germination of embryos excised from dormant seeds of this species, but they did not inhibit the germination of embryos from cold-stratified (nondormant) seeds (Jackson and Blundell, 1963). Seeds of Hyoscyamus muticus contain at least one water-soluble compound that inhibits germination; how­ever, afterripening resulted in an increase in germina­tion percentages (El Hajzein et aiy 1995). What hap­pened to the inhibitors in R. rugosa and H. muticus seeds? There are three possibilities: (1) Inhibitors were removed by leaching or inactivation. With the exception of abscisic acid (ABA), however, effects of dormancy-breaking treatments on the concentration of inhibi­tors in most seeds have not been studied intensively. (2) Embryos became less sensitive to inhibitors as they came out of physiological dormancy. For example, the concentration of ABA required to inhibit the germina­tion of Pyrus malus seeds increased with an increase in cold stratification (Rudnecki, 1969). Also, the inhibitor content of the embryo in Fraxinus excelsior seeds

changed little during 6 months of cold stratification, although the seeds became nondormant (Villiers and Wareing (1960). (3) Germination-promoting chemicals (e.g., GA) were produced and counteracted the effects of the inhibitor. Although endogenous GA has been found in seeds of only a few species, Karssen et al (1989) have shown, using GA-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana and Lycopersicon sp., that GA absolutely is required for germination. However, there was little di­rect evidence that GA blocked germination inhibitors. In Corylus avellana, ABA declined during cold stratifi­cation at S 'C, but most of the GA was not produced until after seeds were transferred from 5 to 20'*C (Ross and Bradbeer, 1971). Also, when ABA and GA were applied exogenously to C avellana seeds, ABA antago­nized GA (Bradbeer, 1968), i.e., GA did not override ABA! GA overcame the inhibitory effects of ABA in intact caryopses of Hordeum vulgare but not in isolated embryos (Dunwell, 1981). Obviously, much research re­mains to be done on the relationship between GA and ABA (and other germination inhibitors) and their role in the induction, maintenance, and breaking of physio­logical dormancy.

In conclusion, it is hard to be sure if there are any cases of true chemical dormancy because the effects of inhibitors in many studies have been tested on seeds after PD was broken. Thus, it is unclear whether inhibi­tors would have prevented germination of nondormant seeds (e.g., Went, 1955). We suggest that chemical dor­mancy be used to describe only those species whose seeds lack physiological dormancy, and thus the factor preventing germination is a chemical that can be leached out of the seed or somehow deactivated.

2. Abscisic Acid

Abscisic acid is found in various plant parts, including the seeds of numerous species, and it inhibits the ger­mination of nondormant seeds of many species when applied exogenously (Milborrow, 1974; Zigas and Coombe, 1977). Levels of ABA in seeds generally in­crease during the first half of seed development, when dry weight is increasing, and they decrease in the second half, when water content is declining (Hilhorst, 1995). Because the embryo is dormant at maturity in Phaseolus vulgaris (legume) seeds, it is interesting to follow the levels of ABA during seed development. Peak ABA levels in P. vulgaris embryos occurred from the 18th to 29th day following anthesis, which corresponds to the period of maximum increase in embryo weight but little decrease in water content. From days 29 to 42, there was very little increase in embryo weight, but water content decreased greatly. The delay (lag time) in the germination of embryos excised from developing seeds

Page 15: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

IV. Overview of Types of Seed Dormancy 41

increased with an increase in their ABA content (Pre-vost and Le Page-Degivry, 1985). Thus, ABA may play a role in preventing germination until seed drying occurs (Finkelstein et ai, 1985).

The direct role, if any, of ABA in dormancy induction is not clear. In freshly matured seeds, ABA levels may be higher in dormant than in nondormant seeds (e.g., Sondheimer et al, 1968; Walker-Simmons, 1987), but some nondormant seeds have high levels of ABA (Braun and Khan, 1975; Nikolaeva etaly 1978). In some cases, e.g.. Mains domestica, embryo dormancy is in­duced before ABA levels rise (Balboa-Zavala and Dennis, 1977). Further, the level of ABA in some seeds may decline before development is completed (Walton, 1980). ABA prevented germination in achenes of Lactuca sativa incubated at 25°C and thus facilitated development of secondary dormancy. However, ABA was not required to maintain secondary dormancy, and when ABA levels decreased, dormancy was not broken (Karssen, 1982). Thus, a high concentration of ABA in seeds does not necessarily mean that ABA induces dormancy. Further, the effects of ABA may be influ­enced by incubation temperatures (Walker-Simmons, 1988) and/or a variation in sensitivity of embryos to ABA at different stages of development (Welbaum et al, 1990).

In a number of species, dormancy develops as seeds dry on the mother plant (Chapter 2). This phenomenon suggests that the role of ABA in dormancy induction may not be induction of dormancy per se but prevention of germination until dormancy is induced. That is, ABA is important in preventing precocious germination of the developing embryo (Zeevaart and Creelman, 1988; Benech Arnold et al, 1991). In some species, ABA applied to excised embryos prevents precocious germi­nation (Kermode et al, 1989). Embryos from mutant Zea mays seeds that germinate prior to dispersal from the mother plant (vivipary) are less sensitive to ABA than those from seeds of nonviviparous strains (Robi-chaud and Sussex, 1986).

One way in which ABA may prevent germination is to inhibit radicle growth, as, for example, in seeds of Chenopodium album (Karssen, 1976) and Sinapis alba (Schopfer et al, 1979). Radicle growth of 5. alba stops because ABA inhibits the uptake of water (Schopfer et ai, 1979). Further, ABA lowers the ability of the embryo to take up water when it is subjected to osmotic stress (Schopfer and Flacky, 1984). Water uptake is controlled by cell wall loosening rather than by changes in osmotic potential or water conductance (Schopfer and Flacky, 1985). Thus, a peak in ABA may signal the initiation of embryo/seed drying. Sussex (1975) suggested that RNA and protein synthesis and embryo growth cease after ABA accumulates.

If the primary role of ABA in dormancy induction is to prevent embryo growth until dormancy is induced during drying, then it is easy to understand why (1) nondormant seeds could have high levels of ABA in them and (2) some dormant seeds have low levels of it. In the former case, the seeds dried before ABA was broken down, whereas in the latter case it was broken down by the time seed drying was completed. It would be interesting to determine the amount of ABA in recal­citrant seeds of both temperate and tropical species during the time of seed maturation and dispersal.

Galau et ai (1991) concluded that an understanding of the role of ABA in the regulation of embryogenesis and germination may not be possible until more is known about seed development at the molecular level. Certainly, research on Arabidopsis thaliana is moving in that direction (see McCarty, 1995). Crossing experi­ments between an ABA-deficient mutant line oiA. thal­iana and a wild type of this species have shown that both maternal tissues and the embryo/endosperm produce ABA, but only an increase in ABA of the embryo/ endosperm was correlated with the development of seed dormancy. After dormancy developed in seeds, how­ever, ABA was not required for its maintenance (Kars­sen et al, 1983). Seeds of the A. thaliana ABA-deficient and ABA-insensitive double mutant were viable, and they germinated if placed on a wet substrate and died if allowed to dry rapidly (Ooms et al, 1993). However, desiccation tolerance was induced by (1) slow drying, (2) osmotic stress, or (3) incubation in 100 ixM ABA. Desiccation tolerance occurred because either the ABA-responsive- or the dehydration-responsive genes were activated (Ooms et al., 1994).

Because cold stratification breaks dormancy in seeds of many species, a number of studies have been done attempting to correlate a decrease in ABA with loss of dormancy during chilling. ABA could not be found in seeds of Pyrus mains that had been cold stratified at 2-4°C for 21 days; however, seeds required 84 days of cold stratification for a complete loss of dormancy (Rudnicki, 1969). ABA levels decreased in Fraxinus americana seeds during cold stratification, but they did not decline in nonchilled ones (Sondheimer etal, 1968). ABA decreased 98 and 37% for seeds of Acer sacchamm incubated at 5 and 20°C, respectively, but seeds became nondormant only at 5°C (Webb et al, 1973). However, ABA levels in Corylus avellana seeds decreased 61% at both 5 and 20°C (WiUiams et al, 1973), but only seeds at 5°C became nondormant. Likewise, ABA levels in seeds of Mains domestica decreased greatly at both 5 and 20°C, but only those at 5°C became nondormant (Balboa-Zavala and Dennis, 1977). The story is the same in achenes of Rosa rugosa (Tillberg, 1983) and in intact seeds of Acer platanoides (Pinfield et al, 1989) and A.

Page 16: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

42 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

velutinum (Pinfield and Stutchbury, 1990). Thus, dormancy-breaking conditions are not required for a decrease in the concentration of ABA in some seeds. However, a decrease in ABA does not mean that seeds will become nondormant.

G. Mechanical Dormancy

According to Nikolaeva (1969), mechanical dor­mancy is due to the presence of a hard, woody fruit wall. The woody structure usually is endocarp, but some­times the mesocarp also is woody (Hill, 1933). Stony endocarps are found in (some or all members of) many families, including Anacardiaceae, Apocynaceae, Are-caceae, Burseraceae, Cornaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Elaeo-carpaceae, Juglandaceae, Lecythidaceae, Meliaceae, Nyssaceae, Oleaceae, Pandaceae, Rhamnaceae, Ros-aceae, Sapotaceae, TiUaceae, and Zygophyllaceae (Ni­kolaeva, 1969; Hill, 1933,1937). In the Anacardiaceae, Rhamnaceae, and Tiliaceae, the endocarp can be imper­meable to water, resulting in the fruits (seeds) having physical dormancy (Table 3.5). In other families, the endocarp is permeable to water, but germination does not occur until fruits receive a dormancy-breaking treat­ment. Some fruits with stony endocarps [e.g., some Ro-saceae in the subfamily Prunoideae (sensu Mabberley, 1987)] have embryos with deep physiological dormancy; consequently, long periods of cold stratification are re­quired for loss of dormancy (Nikolaeva, 1969). In tropi­cal famiHes such as the Burseraceae, Lecythidaceae, and Sapotaceae, it is conceivable that fruits would require warm stratification before they could germinate, but this has not been documented.

Nikolaeva (1969,1977) worked only with stony fruits that had a cold stratification requirement for germina­tion. She noted that there was no evidence that the endocarp **. . . acts as a mechanical obstacle to a germi­nating embryo." In other words, once dormancy of the embryo is broken, it has enough growth potential to push through the endocarp. Thus, it appears that mechanical dormancy in these species should be viewed as an aspect or manifestation of physiological dormancy.

Hill (1933, 1937) investigated the manner in which endocarps open at the time of germination. In Rosaceae, Oleaceae, and Juglandaceae, the endocarp splits into two halves, but in many families only a portion of the endocarp is pushed aside by the emerging radicle, some­thing like the opening of a shutter or lid. In some cases, the stony seed-bearing structure represents the fusion of two or more fruits, each with a single seed. Thus, the stony structure may have more than one opening after all the seeds have germinated: two in Cornus (Corn­aceae), three in Canarium (Burseraceae), four in Tec-tona (Verbenaceae), and five in Davidia (Davidiaceae).

In Parinari (Rosaceae), Dracontomelon (Anacardi­aceae), and Berthollettia (Lecythidaceae), the opening is more Uke a cork or stopper than a lid (Hill, 1937).

References

Atwood, W. M. (1914). A physiological study of the germination of Avena fatua. Bot. Gaz. 57, 386-414.

Balboa-Zavala, O., and Dennis, F. G., Jr. (1977). Abscisic acid and apple seed dormancy. /. Am. Soc. Hort ScL 102, 633-637.

Barton, L. V. (1934). Dormancy in Tilia seeds. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 6, 69-89.

Barton, L. V. (1956). Growth response of physiologic dwarfs of Malm arnoldiana Sarg. to gibberellic acid. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 18, 311-317.

Baskin, C. C, and Baskin, J. M. (1994). Germination requirements of Oenothera biennis seeds during burial under natural seasonal temperature cycles. Can. J. Bot. 72, 779-782.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1971a). Germination of Cyperus inflexus Muhl. Bot. Gaz. 132, 3-9.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1971b). Effect of chilling and gibbe­rellic acid on growth potential of excised embryos of Ruellia hum-His. Planta 100, 365-369.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1976). Effect of photoperiod on germination of Cyperus inflexus seeds. Bot. Gaz. 137, 269-273.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1979). Studies on the autecology and population biology of the weedy monocarpic perennial, Pastinaca sativa. J. Ecol. 67, 601-610.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1982). Ecological life cycle and temperature relations of seed germination and bud growth of Scutellaria parvula. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 109,1-6.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C C. (1984a). Role of temperature in regulating timing of germination in soil seed reserves of Lamium purpureum L. Weed Res. 24, 341-349.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1984b). Effect of temperature during burial on dormant and non-dormant seeds of Lamium amplexi-caule L. and ecological implications. Weed Res. lA^ 333-339.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C C. (1984c). Germination ecophysiology of the woodland herb Osmorhiza longistylis (Umbelliferae). Am. J. Bot. 71, 687-692.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1984d). Germination ecophysiology of an eastern deciduous forest herb Stylophorum diphyllum. Am. Midi. Nat. I l l , 390-399.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1985). Seed germination ecophysiol­ogy of the woodland spring geophyte Erythronium albidum. Bot. Gaz. 146,130-136.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1986a). Temperature requirements for after-ripening in seeds of nine winter annuals. Weed Res. 26, 375-380.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1986b). Germination ecophysiology of the mesic deciduous forest herb Isopyrum bitematum. Bot. Gaz. 147,152-155.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1990a). Seed germination ecology of poison hemlock, Conium maculatum. Can. J. Bot. 68,2018-2024.

Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. (1990b). Germination ecophysiology of seeds of the winter annual Chaerophyllum tainturieri: A new type of morphophysiological dormancy. J. Ecol. 78, 993-1004.

Benech Arnold, R. L., Fenner, M., and Edwards, P. J. (1991). Changes in germinability, ABA content and ABA embryonic sensitivity in developing seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. induced by water stress during grain filling. New Phytol. 118, 339-347.

Bewley, J. D., and Black, M. (1982). "Physiology and Biochemistry

Page 17: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

References 43

of Seeds in Relation to Germination," Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Bewley, J. D., and Black, M. (1994). "Seeds: Physiology of Develop­ment and Germination," 2nd Ed. Plenum Press, New York/ London.

Black, M. (1996). Liberating the radicle: A case for softening-up. Seed Sci. Res. 6, 39-42.

Black, M., and Wareing, P. F. (1959). The role of germination inhibi­tors and oxygen in the dormancy of the light-sensitive seed of Betiila spp. J. Exp. Bot. 10, 134-145.

Blommaert, K. L. J., and Hurter, N. (1959). Growth response of physiologic dwarf seedlings of peach, apricot and plum to gibbe-rellic acid. S. Afr. J. Agric. ScL 2, 409-411.

Blumenthal, A., Lerner, H. R., Werker, E., and Poljakoff-Mayber, A. (1986). Germination preventing mechanisms in iris seeds. Ann. Bot. 58, 551-561.

Boesewinkel, F. D., and Bouman, F. (1984). The seed: structure. In "Embryology of Angiosperms" (B. M. Johri, ed.), pp. 567-610. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo.

Bradbeer, J. W. (1968). Studies in seed dormancy. IV. The role of endogenous inhibitors and gibberellin in the dormancy and germi­nation of Corylus avellana L. seeds. Planta 78, 266-276.

Bradbeer, J. W. (1988). "Seed Dormancy and Germination." Chap­man and Hall, New York.

Braun, J. W., and Khan, A. A. (1975). Endogenous abscisic acid levels in germinating and nongerminating lettuce seed. Plant Physiol. 56, 731-733.

Brown, N. A. C , and Bridglall, S. S. (1987). Preliminary studies of seed dormancy in Datura stramonium. S. Afr. J. Bot. 53,107-109.

Brown, N. A. C , and van Staden, J. (1973). Studies on the regulation of seed germination in the South African Proteaceae. Agroplantae 5, 111-116.

Bullowa, S., Negbi, M., and Ozeri, Y. (1975). Role of temperature, light and growth regulators in germination in Anemone coronaria L. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2, 91-100.

Carpita, N. C , Nabors, M. W., Ross, C. W., and Petretic, N. L. (1979). The growth physics and water relations of red-light-induced germi­nation in lettuce seeds. Planta 144, 217-224.

Carpita, N. C , Sharia, A., Barnett, J. P., and Dunlap, J. R. (1983). Cold stratification and growth of radicles of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) embryos. Physiol. Plant. 59, 601-606.

Cavanagh, A. K. (1980). A review of some aspects of the germination of Acacias. Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. 91, 161-180.

Chen, S. S. C. (1968). Germination of light-inhibited seed of Nemophi-lia insignis. Am. J. Bot. 55, 1177-1183.

Chen, S. S. C. (1970). Influence of factors affecting germination on respiration of Phacelia tanacetifolia seeds. Planta 95, 330-335.

Chen, S. S. C , and Thimann, K. V. (1966). Nature of seed dormancy in Phacelia tanacetifolia. Science 153, 1537-1539.

Christiansen, M. N., and Moore, R. P. (1959). Seed coat structural differences that influence water uptake and seed quality in hard seed cotton. Agron. J. 51, 582-584.

Choate, H. A. (1940). Dormancy and germination in seeds of Echino-cystis lohata. Am. J. Bot. 27, 156-160.

Come, D., and Tissaoui, T. (1972). Interrelated effects of imbibition, temperature and oxygen on seed germination. In "Seed Ecology" (W. Heydecker, ed.), pp. 157-167. Proceedings of the 19th Easter School in Agriculture, Univ. of Nottingham. Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, University Park, PA.

Conover, D. G., and Geiger, D. R. (1984). Germination of AustraHan channel millet [Echinochloa turnerana (Domin) J. M. Black] seeds. I. Dormancy in relation to light and water. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. I I , 395-408.

Corner, E. J. H. (1951). The leguminous seed. Phytomorphology 1, 117-150.

Corner, E. J. H. (1976). "The Seeds of Dicotyledons," Vols. I and II. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge/London/New York/Mel­bourne.

Corral, R., Perez-Garcia, F., and Pita, J. M, (1989). Seed morphology and histology in four species of Cistus L. (Cistaceae). Phytomor­phology 39, 75-80.

Coumans, M., Come, D., and T. Caspar, T. (1976). Stabilized dor­mancy in sugar beet fruits. I. Seed coats as a physicochemical barrier to oxygen. Bot. Gaz. 137, 274-278.

Cranston, H. J., Kern, A. J., Gerhardt, S. A., and Dyer, W. E. (1996). Wound-induced ethylene and germination of embryos excised from dormant Avena fatua L. caryopses. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 153-158.

Crocker, Wm. (1948). "Growth of Plants," Chap. 3. Reinhold, New York.

Crocker, Wm., and Barton, L. V. (1931). After-ripening, germination, and storage of certain Rosaceous seeds. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 3, 385-404.

Curtis, E. J. C , and Cantlon, J. E. (1963). Germination of Melampyrum lineare: Interrelated effects of afterripening and gibberellic acid. Science 140, 406-408.

Dahlgren, R. M. T., and Clifford, H. T. (1982). "The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study." Academic Press, New York.

Davis, W. E. (1930). Primary dormancy, after-ripening and the devel­opment of secondary dormancy in embryos of Ambrosia trifida. Am. J. Bot 17, 58-76.

Dekker, J., Dekker, B., Hilhorst, H., and Karssen, C. (1996). Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. IV. Changes in the germinative capacity of S. faherii (Poaceae) embryos with development from anthesis to after abscission. Am. J. Bot. 83, 979-991.

Dell, B. (1980). Structure and function of the strophiolar plug in seeds of Albizia lophantha. Am. J. Bot. 67, 556-563.

de Miguel, L., and Sanchez, R. A. (1992). Phytochrome-induced ger­mination, endosperm softening and embryo growth potential in Datura ferox seeds: Sensitivity to low water potential and time to escape to FR reversal. / . Exp. Bot. 43, 969-974.

Downie, B., and Bewley, J. D. (1996). Dormancy in white spruce {Picea glauca [Moench.] Voss.) seeds is imposed by tissues sur­rounding the embryo. Seed Sci. Res. 6, 9-15.

Dungey, N. O., and Pinfield, N. J. (1980). The effect of temperature on the supply of oxygen to embryos of intact Acer pseudoplatanus seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 983-992.

Dunwell, J. M. (1981). Dormancy and germination in embryos of Hordeum vulgare L.: Effect of dissection, incubation temperature and hormone application. Ann. Bot. 48, 203-213.

Edwards, M. M. (1968a). Dormancy in seeds of charlock. II. The influence of the seed coat. J. Exp. Bot. 19, 583-600.

Edwards, M. M. (1968b). Dormancy in seeds of charlock. III. Occur­rence and mode of action of an inhibitor associated with dormancy. / Exp. Bot. 19, 601-610.

Edwards, M. M. (1969). Dormancy in seeds of charlock. IV. Interrela­tionships of growth, oxygen supply and concentration of inhibitor. /. Exp. Bot. 20, 876-894.

Egley, G. H. (1982). Ethylene stimulation of weed seed germination. Agric. For. Bull, Univ. Alberta 5(2), 13-18.

Egley, G. H., Paul, R. N., Jr., and Lax, A. R. (1986). Seed coat imposed dormancy: Histochemistry of the region controlHng onset of water entry into Sida spinosa seeds. Physiol. Plant. 67, 320-327.

El Hajzein, B., Geslot, A., and Mairone, Y. (1995). La germination des graines de Hyoscyamus muticus (L.) Schrad. I. Influence des enveloppes seminales et dormance embryonnaire relative. Rev. Cytol. Biol. Veget. Bot. 18, 21-37.

Page 18: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

44 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

Esashi, Y., and Leopold, A. C. (1968). Physical forces in dormancy and germination of Xanthium seeds. Plant Physiol. 43, 871-876.

Esau, K. (1964). "Anatomy of Seed Plants." Wiley, New York. Evenari, M. (1949). Germination inhibitors. Bot. Rev. 15,153-194. Finkelstein, R. R., Tenbarge, K. M., Shumway, J. E., and Crouch,

M. L. (1985). Role of ABA in maturation of rapeseed embryos. Plant Physiol 78, 630-636.

Flemion, F. (1931). After-ripening, germination, and vitality of seeds of Sorbus aucuparia L. Contrih. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 3, 413-439.

Flemion, F. (1933a). Physiological and chemical studies of after-ripening of Rhodotypos kerrioides seeds. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 5,143-159.

Flemion, F. (1933b). Dwarf seedlings from non-after-ripened embryos of Rhodotypos kerrioides. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 5,161-165.

Flemion, F. (1934). Dwarf seedlings from non-after-ripened embryos of peach, apple, and hawthorne. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 6, 205-209.

Flemion, F. (1937). After-ripening at 5°C favors germination of grape seeds. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 9, 7-15.

Flemion, F. (1959). Effect of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on stem elongation and leaf development in physiologically dwarfed seedlings of peach and Rhodotypos. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 20, 57-70.

Flemion, F., and Waterbury, E. (1945). Further studies with dwarf seedlings of non-after-ripened peach seeds. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 13, 415-422.

Frankland, B., and Wareing, P. F. (1966). Hormonal regulation of seed dormancy in hazel (Corylus avellana L.) and beech {Fagus sylvatica L.). / Exp. Bot. 17, 596-611.

Galau, G. A, Jakobsen, K. S., and Hughes, D. W. (1991). The controls of late dicot embryogenesis and early germination. Physiol. Plant. 81, 280-288.

Garman, H. R., and Barton, L. V. (1946). Response of lettuce seeds to thiourea treatments as affected by variety and age. Contrib. Boyce Thomp. Inst. 14, 229-241.

Gay, C, Corbineau, F., and Come, D. (1991). Effects of temperature and oxygen on seed germination and seedling growth in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 31, 193-200.

Georghiou, K., Psaras, G., and Mitrakos, K. (1983). Lettuce endo­sperm structural changes during germination under different light, temperature, and hydration conditions. Bot. Gaz. 144, 207-211.

Goebel, K. (1905). "Organography of plants," Part IL Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Graven, P., de Koster, C. G., Boon, J. J., and Bouman, F. (1996). Structure and macromolecular composition of the seed coat of the Musaceae. Ann. Bot. 77,105-122.

Gray, R. A. (1958). Breaking the dormancy of peach seeds and crab grass seeds with gibberellins. Plant Physiol. 33, Suppl. xl-xli. [Ab­stract]

Groot, S. P. C, and Karssen, C. M. (1987). Gibberellins regulate seed germination in tomato by endosperm weakening: A study with gibberellin-deficient mutants. Planta 171, 525-531.

Groot, S. P. C, Kieliszewska-Rokicka, B., Vermeer, E., and Karssen, C. M. (1988). Gibberellin-induced hydrolysis of endosperm cell walls in gibberellin-deficient tomato seeds prior to radicle protru­sion. Planta 174, 500-504.

Grootjen, C. J., and Bouman, F. (1988). Seed structure in Cannaceae: Taxonomic and ecological implications. Ann. Bot. 61, 363-371.

Grushvitzky, I. V. (1961). Role of embryo underdevelopment in the evolution of flowering plants. Komarovskie Chteniya 4,1-46.

Grushvitzky, L V. (1967). After-ripening of seeds of primitive tribes of Angiosperms, conditions and peculiarities. In "Physiologie, Okologie und Biochemie der Keimung" (H. Borriss, ed.), pp. 329-336. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat, Greifswald.

Hagon, M. W., and Ballard, L. A. T. (1970). Reversibility of strophiolar permeability to water in seeds of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23, 519-528.

Hanna, P. J. (1984). Anatomical features of the seed coat of Acacia kempeana (Mueller) which relate to increased germination rate induced by heat treatment. New Phytol. 96, 23-29.

Harrington, G. T., and Hite, B. C. (1923). After-ripening and germina­tion of apple seeds. / Agric. Res. 23,153-161.

Hatterman-Valenti, H., Bello, I. A., and Owen, M. D. K. (1996). Physiological basis of seed dormancy in woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa [Thunb.] Kunth.). Weed Sci. 44, 87-90.

Hayat, M. A. (1963). Morphology of seed germination and seedling in Annona squamosa. Bot. Gaz. 124, 360-362.

Hill, A. W. (1933). The method of germination of seeds enclosed in a stony endocarp. Ann. Bot. 47, 873-887.

Hill, A. W. (1937). The method of germination of seeds enclosed in a stony endocarp. IL Ann. Bot. 51, 239-256.

Hilhorst, H. W. M. (1995). A critical update on seed dormancy. I. Primary dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 5, 61-73.

Hilhorst, H. W. M., and Downie, B. (1995). Primary dormancy in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum c.v. moneymaker): Studies with the sitiens mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 89-97.

Horovitz, A., Bullowa, S., and Negbi, M. (1975). Germination charac­ters in wild and cultivated Anemone coronaria L. Euphytica 24, 213-220.

Hsiao, A. L, Mclntyre, G. L, and Hanes, J. A. (1983). Seed dormancy in Avenafatua. L Induction of germination by mechanical injury. Bot. Gaz. 144, 217-222.

Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. (1985). Wild oats (Avenafatua L.) seed dormancy as influenced by sodium hypochlorite, moist storage and gibberellin A3. Weed Res. 25, 281-288.

Hussey, G. (1958). An analysis of the factors controlling the germina­tion of the seed of the oil palm, Elaeis guineensis (Jacq.). Ann. Bot. 22, 259-284 4- 2 plates.

Jackson, G. A. D., and Blundell, J. B. (1963). Germination in Rosa. J. Hon Sci. 38, 310-320.

Jacobsen, J. V., and Pressman, E. (1979). A structural study of germi­nation in celery (Apium graveolens L.) seed with emphasis on endosperm breakdown. Planta 144, 241-248.

Jacobsen, J. V., Pressman, E., and Pyliotis, N. A. (1976). Gibberellin-induced separation of cells in isolated endosperm of celery seed. Planta 129,113-122.

Jones, R. O., and Geneve, R. L. (1995). Seedcoat structure related to germination in eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis L.). J. Am. Soc. Hon Sci. 120, 123-127.

Junttila, O. (1973). The mechanism of low temperature dormancy in mature seeds of Syringa species. Physiol. Plant. 29, 256-263.

Karssen, C. M. (1976). Two sites of hormonal action during germina­tion of Chenopodium album seeds. Physiol. Plant. 36, 264-270.

Karssen, C. M. (1982). Indirect effect of abscisic acid on the induction of secondary dormancy in lettuce seeds. Physiol. Plant. 54, 258-266.

Karssen, C. M., Brinkhorst-van der Swan, D. L. C, Breekland, A. E., and Koomneef, M. (1983). Induction of dormancy during seed development by endogenous abscisic acid: Studies on abscisic acid deficient genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 157,158-165.

Karssen, C. M., Zagorski, S., Kepcynski, J., and Groot, S. P. C. (1989). Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germi­nation. Ann. Bot. 63, 71-80.

Kermode, A. R., Oishi, M. Y., and Bewley, J. D. (1989). Regulatory roles for desiccation and abscisic acid in seed development: A comparison of the evidence from whole seeds and isolated em­bryos. Crop Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. No. 14, 23-50.

Page 19: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

References 45

Ketring, D. L. (1973). Germination inhibitors. Seed Sci. Technoi 1, 305-324.

Khan, A., Goss, J. A., and Smith, D. E. (1957). Effect of gibberellin on germination of lettuce seed. Science 125, 645-646.

Khan, A. A., and Samimy, C (1982). Hormones in relation to primary and secondary seed dormancy. In "The Physiology and Biochemis­try of Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination" (A. A. Khan, ed.), pp. 203-241. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam/ New York/Oxford.

Koller, D., and Cohen, D. (1959). Germination-regulating mechanisms in some desert seeds. VI. Convolvulus lanatus Vahl, Convolvulus negevensis Zoh. and Convolvulus secundus Desr. Bull, Res. Counc. Israel 7D, 175-180.

Kontos, F., Spyropoulos, C. G., Griffen, A., and Bewley, J. D. (1996). Factors affecting endo-/3-mannanase activity in the endosperms of fenugreek and carob seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 6, 23-29.

Kuijt, J. (1969). "The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants." Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Kumar, U. (1977). Morphogenetic regulation of seed germination in Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers. Can. J. Bot. 55, 2613-2621.

Kumar, P., and Singh, D. (1991). Development and structure of seed coat in Malva L. Phytomorphology 41, 147-153.

Lammerts, W. E. (1943). Effect of photoperiod and temperature on growth of embryo-cultured peach seedlings. Am. J. Bot. 30, 707-711.

Leubner-Metzger, G., Frundt, C , Vogeli-Lange, R., and Meins, F., Jr. (1995). Class 1 /3-1,3-glucanases in the endosperm of tobacco during germination. Plant Physiol. 109, 751-759.

Leviatov, S., Shoseyov, O., and Wolf, S. (1995). Involvement of endo-mannanase in the control of tomato seed germination under low temperature conditions. Ann. Bot. 76, 1-6.

Lhotska, M., and Moravcova, L. (1989). The ecology of germination and reproduction of less frequent and vanishing species of the Czechoslovak flora. II. Pulsatilla slavica Reuss. Folia Geobot. Phy-totax. 24,211-214.

Lush, W. M., Kaye, P. E., and Groves, R. H. (1984). Germination of Clematis microphylla seeds following weathering and other treat­ments. Aust. J. Bot. 32, 121-129.

Lyshede, O. B. (1992). Studies on mature seeds of Cuscutapedicellata and C. campestris by electron microscopy. Ann. Bot. 69, 365-371.

Mabberley, D. J. (1987). "The Plant-Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants." Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

Manning, J. C , and van Staden, J. (1987). The functional differentia­tion of the testa in seed of Indigofera parviflora (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Bot. Gaz. 148, 23-34.

Marbach, I., and Meyer, A. M. (1975). Changes in catechol oxidase and permeability to water in seed coats of Pisum elatius during seed development and maturation. Plant Physiol. 56, 93-96.

Martin, A. C. (1946). The comparative internal morphology of seeds. Am. Midi. Nat. 36, 513-660.

McCarty, D. R. (1995). Genetic control and integration of maturation and germination pathways in seed development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 71-93.

McDonough, W. T. (1967). Dormant and non-dormant seeds: Similar germination responses when osmotically inhibited. Nature 214, 1147-1148.

McKeon, G. M., and Mott, J. J. (1984). Seed biology of Stylosanthes. In "The Biology and Agronomy of Stylosanthes'' (H. M. Stace and L. A. Edye, eds.), pp. 311-332. Academic Press, Sydney.

Milborrow, B. V. (1974). The chemistry and physiology of abscisic acid. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 25, 259-307.

Mitrakos, K., and Diamantoglou, S. (1984). Endosperm dormancy breakage in olive seeds. Physiol. Plant. 62, 8-10.

Myers, S. P., Foley, M. E., and Nichols, M. B. (1997). Developmental

differences between germinating after-ripened and dormant ex­cised Avena fatua L. embryos. Ann. Bot. 79,19-23.

Nabors, M. W., and Lang, A. (1971). The growth physics and water relations of red-light-induced germination in lettuce seeds. I. Em­bryos germinating in osmoticum. Planta 101, 1-25.

Natesh, S., and Rau, M. A. (1984). The embryo. In "Embryology of Angiosperms" (B. M. Johri, ed.), pp. 377-443. Springer-Verlag, Berhn.

Nikolaeva, M. G. (1969). Physiology of deep dormancy in seeds. Izda-tel'stvo "Nauka," Leningrad [Translated from Russian by Z. Sha­piro, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC]

Nikolaeva, M. G. (1977). Factors controlling the seed dormancy pat­tern. In "The Physiology and Biochemistry of Seed Dormancy and Germination" (A. A. Khan, ed.), pp. 51-74. North-Holland, Amsterdam/New York.

Nikolaeva, M. G., Daletskaya, T. V., Razumova, M. V., and Kofanova, N, N. (1973). Effects of gibberellin and kinetin on embryo growth and seed germination in spindle tree and tatar maple. Sov. Plant Physiol. 20, 600-605.

Nikolaeva, M. G., Polyakova, E. N., Razumova M. V., and Askochen-skaya, N. A. (1978). Mechanism governing inhibition of germina­tion in seeds of Siberian pea tree. Sov. Plant Physiol. 25,991-999.

Nikolaeva, M. G., and Vorob'eva, N. S. (1979). The role of abscisic acid and indolic compounds in dormancy of the seeds of ash spe­cies. Sov. Plant Physiol. 26, 105-113.

Nomaguchi, M., Nonogaki, H., and Morohashi, Y. (1995). Develop­ment of galactomannan-hydrolyzing activity in the micropylar en­dosperm tip of tomato seed prior to germination, Physiol. Plant. 94, 105-109.

Nonogaki, H., and Morohashi, Y. (1996). An endo-/8-mannanase de­velops exclusively in the micropylar endosperm of tomato seeds prior to radicle emergence. Plant Physiol. 110, 555-559.

Ohga, I. (1926). On the structure of some ancient, but still viable fruits of Indian lotus, with special reference to their prolonged dormancy. Jpn. J. Bot. 3,1-19.

Olson, A. R. (1980). Seed morphology of Monotropa uniflora L. (Eri­caceae). Am. J. Bot. 67, 968-974.

Ooms, J. J. J., Leon-Kloosterziel, K. M., Bartels, D., Koorneei M., and Karssen, C. M. (1993). Acquisition of desiccation tolerance and longevity in seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 102, 1185-1191.

Ooms, J. J. J., van der Veen, R., and Karssen, C. M. (1994). Abscisic acid and osmotic stress or slow drying independently induce desic­cation tolerance in mutant seeds oi Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 92, 506-510.

Perez-Garcia, F. and Pita, J. M. (1989). Mechanical resistance of the seed coat during germination of Onopordum nervosum Boiss. Seed Set Technoi 17, 277-282.

Pinfield, N. J., Davies, H. V., and Stobart, A. K. (1974). Embryo dormancy in seeds of Acer platanoides. Physiol Plant 32,268-272.

Pinfield, N. J., Martin, M. H., and Stobart, A. K. (1972). The control of germination in Stachys alpina (L.). New Phytol 71, 99-104.

Pinfield, N. J., and Stobart, A. K. (1972). Hormonal regulation of germination and early seedling development in Acer pseudoplat-anus (L.). Planta 104, 134-145.

Pinfield, N. J., and Stutchbury, P. A. (1990). Seed dormancy in Acer: The role of testa-imposed and embryo dormancy in Acer veluti-num. Ann. Bot. 66, 133-137.

Pinfield, N. J., Stutchbury, P. A., Bazaid, S. A., and Gwarazimba, V. E. E. (1989). Seed dormancy in Acer: The relationship between seed dormancy, embryo dormancy and abscisic acid in Acer plat­anoides L. / . Plant Physiol 135, 313-318.

Porter, N. G., and Wareing, P. F. (1974). The role of oxygen permeabil-

Page 20: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

46 3. Types of Seed Dormancy

ity of the seed coat in the dormancy of seed oiXanthiumpensylvan-icum Wallr. J. Exp. Bot. 25, 583-594.

Pressman, E., Negbi, M., Sachs, M., and Jacobsen, J. V. (1977). Varietal differences in light requirements for germination of celery {Apium graveolens L.) seeds and the effects of thermal and solute stress. Aust J. Plant Physiol. 4, 821-831.

Prevost, I., and Le Page-Degivry, M. Th. (1985). Inverse correlation between ABA content and germinability through the maturation and the in vitro culture of the embryo of Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Exp. Bot. 36, 1457-1464.

Probert, R. J., Smith, R. D., and Birch, P. (1985). Germination re­sponses to light and alternating temperatures in European popula­tions of Dactylis glomerata L. New Phytol. 100, 447-455.

Rangaswamy, N. S. (1967). Morphogenesis of seed germination in Angiosperms. Phytomorphology 17, 477-487.

Ransom, E. R. (1935). The inter-relations of catalase, respiration, after-ripening, and germination in some dormant seeds of the Polygonaceae. Am. J. Bot. 22, 815-825.

Rees, A. R. (1959). The germination of oil palm seed: The cooling effect. /. W. Afr. Inst. Oil Palm Res. 3, 76-82.

Reid, J. S. G., and Davies, C. (1977). Endo-/3-mannanase, the legumi­nous aleurone layer and the storage galactomannan in germinating seeds of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Planta 133, 219-222.

Reynolds, T., and Thompson, P. A. (1973). Effects of kinetin, gibberel-lins and (±) abscisic acid on the germination of lettuce {Lactuca sativa). Physiol. Plant. 28, 516-522.

Riggio-Bevilacqua, L., Roti-Michelozzi, G., and Serrato-Valenti, G. (1985). Barriers to water penetration in Cercis siliquastrum. Seed Sci. Technol. 13, 175-182.

Rizzini, C. T. (1973). Dormancy in seeds of Annona crassiflora Mart. J. Exp. Bot. 24, 117-123.

Robichaud, C, and Sussex, I. M. (1986). The response of viviparous-1 and wild type embryos of Zea mays to culture in the presence of abscisic acid. /. Plant Physiol. 126, 235-242.

Rolston, M. P. (1978). Water impermeable seed dormancy. Bot. Rev. 44, 365-396.

Ross, J. D., and Bradbeer, J. W. (1971). Studies in seed dormancy. V. The content of endogenous gibberellins in seeds of Corylus avellana L. Planta 100, 288-302.

Rudnicki, R. (1969). Studies on abscisic acid in apple seeds. Planta 86, 63-68.

Sanchez, R. A., de Miguel, L., and Mercuri, O. (1986). Phytochrome control of cellulase activity in Datura ferox L. seeds and its relation­ship with germination. J. Exp. Bot. 37,1574-1580.

Sanchez, R. A., Sunell, L., Labavitch, J. M., and Bonner, B. A. (1990). Changes in the endosperm cell walls of two Datura species before radicle protrusion. Plant Physiol. 93, 89-97.

Sanchez-Yelamo, M. D., Tortosa, M. E., Perez-Garcia, F., and Cuquer-ella, A. (1992). Variability among seed coats in some species of the genus Onohrychis Miller (Leguminosae-Fabaceae). Phytomor­phology 42, 257-265.

Scheibe, J., and Lang, A. (1965). Lettuce seed germination: Evidence for a reversible light-induced increase in growth potential and for phytochrome mediation of the low temperature effect. Plant Physiol. 40, 485-492.

Schopfer, P., and Plachy, C. (1984). Control of seed germination by abscisic acid. IL Effect on embryo water uptake in Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol. 76,155-160.

Schopfer, P., and Plachy, C. (1985). Control of seed germination by abscisic acid. IIL Effect on embryo growth potential (minimum turgor pressure) and growth coefficient (cell wall extensibility) in Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol. T7, 676-686.

Schopfer, P., Bajracharya, D., and Plachy, C. (1979). Control of seed

germination by abscisic acid. L Time course of action in Sinapis alba L. Plant Physiol 64, 822-827.

Scorer, K. N., Epel, B. L., and Waisel, Y. (1985). Interactions between mild NaCl stress and red light during lettuce {Lactuca sativa L. cv Grand Rapids) seed germination. Plant Physiol 79,149-152.

Serrato-Valenti, G., Comara, L., Ferrando, M., and Modenesi, P. (1993). Structural and histochemical features of Stylosanthesscabra (Leguminosae; Papilionoideae) seed coat as related to water entry. Can. J. Bot. 71, 834-840.

Serrato-Valenti, G., Comara, L., Ghisellini, P., and Ferrando, M. (1994). Testa structure and histochemistry related to water uptake in Leucaena leucocephala Lam. (De Wit). Ann. Bot. 73, 531-537.

Serrato-Valenti, G., de Vries, M., and Cornara, L. (1995). The hilar region in Leucaena leucocephala Lam. (De Wit) seed: Structure, histochemistry and the role of the lens in germination. Ann. Bot. IS, 569-574.

Singh, C. P. (1985). A comparison between low temperature and gibberellic acid removed dormancy of Euonymous europaeus L. embryos with respect to seedling growth and development. Phyton (Buenos Aires) 45,143-148.

Small, J. G. C, and Gutterman, Y. (1991). Evidence for inhibitor involvement in thermodormancy of grand rapids lettuce seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 1, 263-267.

Sondheimer, E., Tzou, D. S., and Galson, E. C. (1968). Abscisic acid levels and seed dormancy. Plant Physiol 43,1443-1447.

Spyropoulos, C. G., and Reid, J. S. G. (1985). Regulation of a-galactosidase activity and the hydrolysis of galactomannan in the endosperm of the fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed. Planta 166, 271-275.

Steinbauer, G. P. (1937). Dormancy and germination of Fraxinus seeds. Plant Physiol 12, 813-824.

Sussex, I. (1975). Growth and metabolism of the embryo and attached seedling of the viviparous mangrove, Rhizophora mangle. Am. J. Bot. 62, 948-953.

Takahashi, N. (1985). Inhibitory effects of oxygen on the germination of Oryza sativa L. seeds. Ann. Bot. 55, 597-600.

Takeba, G., and Matsubara, S. (1979). Measurement of growth poten­tial of the embryo in New York lettuce seed under various combi­nations of temperature, red light and hormones. Plant Cell Physiol 20, 51-61.

Tao, K.-L., and Khan, A. A. (1979). Changes in the strength of lettuce endosperm during germination. Plant Physiol 63,126-128.

Thanos, C. A., and Georghiou, K. (1988). Ecophysiology of fire-stimulated seed germination in Cistus incanus ssp. creticus (L.) Heywood and C. salvifolius L. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 841-849.

Tillberg, E. (1983). Levels of endogenous abscisic acid in achenes of Rosa rugosa during dormancy release and germination. Physiol Plant. 58, 243-248.

Timson, J. (1966). The germination of Polygonum convolvulus L. New Phytol 65, 423-428.

Toole, E. H., and Toole, V. K. (1941). Progress of germination of seed of Digitaria as influenced by germination temperature and other factors. J. Agric. Res. 63, 65-90.

Toole, V. K. (1941). Factors affecting the germination of various dropseed (Sporobolus spp.)- J- Agric. Res. 62, 691-715.

Toorop, P. E., Bewley, J. D., and Hilhorst, H. W. M. (1996). Endo-/3-mannanase isoforms are present in the endosperm and embryo of tomato seeds, but are not essentially linked to the completion of germination. Planta 200,153-158.

Tukey, H. B., and Carlson, R. F. (1945). Morphological changes in peach seedlings following after-ripening treatments of the seeds. Bot. Gaz. 106, 431-440.

Valenti, G. S., Modenesi, P., Roti-Michelozzi, G., and Bevilacqua, L. (1986). Structural and histochemical characters of the Prosopis

Page 21: Seeds || Types of Seed Dormancy

References 47

tamanigo Phil, seed coat, in relation to its hardness. Acta Bot. Neerl. 35, 475-487.

Vazquez-Yanes, C , and Perez-Garcia, B. (1976). Notas sobre la mor-fologia y la anatomia de la testa de las semillas de Ochroma lagopus Sw. Turriolha 26y 310-311.

Villiers, T. A., and Wareing, P. F. (1960). Interaction of growth inhibi­tor and a natural germination stimulator in the dormancy of Fraxi-niis excelsior L. Nature 185, 112-114.

Voigt, B., and Bewley, J. D. (1996). Developing tomato seeds when removed from the fruit produce multiple forms of germinative and post-germinative endo-B-mannanase: Responses to desiccation, abscisic acid and osmoticum. Planta 200,11-11.

von Teichman, I. (1989). Reinterpretation of the pericarp of Rhus lancea (Anacardiaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 55, 383-384.

von Teichman, I., and Robbertse, P. J. (1986a). Development and structure of the pericarp and seed of Rhus lancea L. fil. (Anacardia­ceae), with taxonomic notes. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 93, 291-306.

von Teichman, I., and Robbertse, P. J. (1986b). Development and structure of the drupe in Sclerocarya birrea (Richard) Hochst. subsp caffra Kokwaro (Anacardiaceae), with special reference to the pericarp and the operculum. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 92, 303-322.

Walker-Simmons, M. (1987). ABA levels and sensitivity in developing wheat embryos of sprouting resistant and susceptible cultivars. Plant Physiol. 84, 61-66.

Walker-Simmons, M. (1988). Enhancement of ABA responsiveness in wheat embryos by high temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 11, 769-775.

Walton, D. C. (1980). Biochemistry and physiology of abscisic acid. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 453-489.

Ware, S. A., and Quarterman, E. (1969). Seed germination in cedar glade Talinum. Ecology 50, 137-140.

Wareing, P. F. (1965). Endogenous inhibitors in seed germination and dormancy. In "Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology" (W. Ruhland, ed.), vol. 15/2, pp. 909-924. Springer-Verlag, BerHn/Heidelberg/ New York.

Wareing. P. F., and Foda, H. A. (1957). Growth inhibitors and dor­mancy in Xanthium seed. Physiol. Plant. 10, 266-280,

Watkins, J. T., and Cantliffe, D. J. (1983a). Hormonal control of pepper seed germination. HortScience 18, 342-343.

Watkins, J. T., and Cantliffe, D. J. (1983b). Mechanical resistance of the seed coat and endosperm during germination of Capsicum annuum at low temperature. Plant Physiol. 12, 146-150.

Watkins, J. T., Cantliffe, D. J., Huber, D. J., and Nell, T. A. (1985). Gibberellic acid stimulated degradation of endosperm in pepper. / Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110, 61-65.

Webb, D. P., and Dumbroff, E. B. (1969). Factors influencing the stratification process in seeds of Acer saccharum. Can. J. Bot. 47, 1555-1563.

Webb, D. O., and Wareing, P. F. (1972). Seed dormancy in Acer. Endogenous germination inhibitors and dormancy in Acerpseudo-platanus L. Planta 104, 115-125.

Webb, D. O., van Staden, J., and Wareing, P. F. (1973). Seed dormancy in Acer: Changes in endogenous cytokinins, gibberellins and germi­nation inhibitors during the breaking of dormancy in Acer sac­charum Marsh. J. Exp. Bot. 24, 105-116.

Welbaum, G. E., Tissaoui, T., and Bradford, K. J. (1990). Water relations of seed development and germination in muskmelon {Cucumis melo L.). Plant Physiol 92, 1029-1037.

Went, F. W. (1955). The ecology of desert plants. Sci. Am. 192(4), 68-75.

Werker, E. (1980-1981). Seed dormancy as explained by the anatomy of embryo envelopes. Israel J. Bot. 29, 22-44.

Williams, P. M., Ross, J. D., and Bradbeer, J. W. (1973). Studies in seed dormancy. VII. The abscisic acid content of the seeds and fruits of Corylus avellana L. Planta 110, 303-310.

Willis, J. C. (revised by H. K. A. Shaw) (1966). "A Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns," 7th Ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

Winter, D. M. (1960). The development of the seed of Abutilon theophrasti. II. Seed coat. Am. J. Bot. 47, 157-162.

Witcombe, J. R., Hillman, J. R., and Whittington, W. J. (1969). Growth inhibitor in the seed coat of charlock. Nature 222, 1200-1201.

Zambou, K., and Spyropoulos, C. G. (1990). D-galactose uptake by fenugreek cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 93, 1417-1421.

Zambou, K., Spyropoulos, C. G., Chinou, I., and Kontos, F. (1993). Saponin-like substances inhibit a-galactosidase production in the endosperm of fenugreek seeds. Planta 189, 207-212.

Zeevaart, J. A. D., and Creelman, R. A. (1988). Metabohsm and physiology of abscisic acid. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 39,439-473.

Zigas, R. P., and Coombe, B. G. (1977). SeedHng development in peach, Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. II. Effects of plant growth regulators and their possible role. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 4,359-369.

Zomlefer, W. B. (1994). "Guide to Flowering Plant Families." Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.