50
Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

Security Matters

V.T. Raja, Ph.D.,

Oregon State University

Page 2: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

2Security Matters

Security Matters

• Outline

– Summary

– Example to illustrate RSA Algorithm– A framework to help managers

understand their role in security

Page 3: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

3Security Matters

Summary from first lecture on Security

• Characteristics of Secure Communication

• Perfect security – a myth or a reality? • Ciphers and Cryptography

• Authentication (ap 1.0 - ap 5.0)

Page 4: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

4Security Matters

Characteristics of Secure Communication

Page 5: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

5Security Matters

Cryptography

• Ciphers– Caesar, Monoalphabetic, Polyalphabetic

• Symmetric Key Cryptography (SKC)– Basic idea of SKC– Notation for symmetric key– Some popular SKC algorithms– Sharing of symmetric key

Page 6: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

6Security Matters

Public Key Cryptography (PKC)

• Basic idea of PKC

• Notation for private/public key pair and plain text message

• RSA Algorithm

• Sharing public key– Sender/Receive Authentication– Man (Woman) in the middle attack

Page 7: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

7Security Matters

RSA Algorithm

• How does RSA work? • Class Participation Exercise on RSA

application• Why does RSA work?

(See additional handouts for answers)

Page 8: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

8Security Matters

Example to illustrate RSA Algorithm Participation Exercise

• Background:– Bob has selected the prime numbers p and q as 5 and 7

respectively.

– Bob has selected e to be the number 5.

– Alice and Bob interpret each letter in the English alphabet as a number between 1 and 26. That is, a = 1, b = 2, …, n = 14,…, z = 26.

– Alice wishes to send the plaintext “love” to Bob, after encrypting using RSA.

• Questions:– Compute Bob’s public key using RSA. – Determine Alice’s cipher text using RSA algorithm.

Page 9: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

9Security Matters

RSA Algorithm

• Even for small p and q, as seen in the participation exercise, we had to deal with extremely large numbers.

• If we follow the suggestion of RSA labs and select p and q to be several hundred bits long, then the following practical issues come to mind:– How to choose large prime numbers p and q?– How to choose e and d?– How to perform exponentiation with large numbers?

(For those who are interested in this area, refer to Kaufman 1995 for answers to the above mentioned questions).

Page 10: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

10Security Matters

RSA and DES/AES

• DES is at least 100 times faster than RSA.

• In practice, RSA is often used in combination with DES or AES. How?

(Alice encrypts DES key with Bob’s public key. Bob decrypts and obtains DES key with his private key. The data is encrypted using DES key, which now both Alice and Bob have access to in order to encrypt/decrypt data).

Page 11: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

11Security Matters

Security of RSA

• The security of RSA relies on the fact that there are no known algorithms for quickly factoring a number (n), into the primes p and q. If one knew p and q, then given e, one could then easily compute the secret key d. It is not known whether or not there exist fast algorithms for factoring a number, and in this sense the security of RSA is not guaranteed.

Page 12: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

12Security Matters

Authentication

• ap 1.0

• ap 2.0

• ap 3.0

• ap 3.1

• ap 4.0

• ap 5.0

Page 13: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

13Security Matters

Authentication

• ap 1.0– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice.”

• Trudy could have sent this message.

• ap 2.0– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice”, and

asks Bob to authenticate her by matching source IP (in IP header) with Alice’s IP.

• Trudy could have sent this message if she had done IP spoofing.

Page 14: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

14Security Matters

Authentication

• ap 3.0– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice”, and asks Bob to

authenticate her by verifying her plaintext password. • Trudy may have already eavesdropped earlier, and have

stolen Alice’s plaintext password during an earlier conversation between Alice and Bob. Now, Trudy could send the message, “I am Alice” by using Alice’s plaintext password.

• ap 3.1– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice”, and asks Bob to

authenticate her by verifying her encrypted password, which is kept the same for different communication sessions between Bob and Alice.

• Same disadvantage mentioned in ap 3.0 still exists. Note that Trudy need not decrypt the password. She could still eavesdrop, steal encrypted password, and then perform a “playback attack” on Bob.

Page 15: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

15Security Matters

Authentication

• ap 4.0– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice.” – Bob sends a plaintext nonce (= r) to Alice.

• Note that nonce is a one time value that is specific to that communication session. It is not repeated again in another session. So “playback attack” is not possible.

– Alice resends same nonce back to Bob but this time nonce is encrypted with symmetric key used by Alice and Bob.

– Bob decrypts nonce using symmetric key. If decrypted nonce equals the nonce he sent Alice earlier (i.e. decrypted nonce = r) , then Alice is authenticated.

– However, this implies that Alice and Bob must have decided upon and exchanged their symmetric key.

Page 16: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

16Security Matters

Authentication

• ap 5.0– Alice announces to Bob, “I am Alice.” – Bob sends a plaintext nonce (= r) to Alice.

• Since nonce is a one-time value, “playback attack” is not possible.

– Alice resends same nonce back to Bob but this time nonce is encrypted with Alice’s private key.

– Bob decrypts nonce using Alice’s public key. If decrypted nonce equals the nonce he sent Alice earlier (i.e. decrypted nonce = r) , then Alice is authenticated.

Page 17: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

17Security Matters

Exchanging Public Keys

• Why should public key be publicly available?

• Wouldn’t it be better for Alice and Bob to exchange their respective public keys via e-mail, after authenticating each other?– Due to possibility of “man (woman) in the

middle attack.”

Page 18: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

18Security Matters

Man (Woman) in the Middle Attack

• Alice transmits, “I am Alice.”• Trudy (alias Eve) eavesdrops. • Bob sends a nonce = r. • Trudy intercepts nonce, and

sends Bob encrypted nonce (encrypted using her private key).

• Bob sends a message to Alice asking her for a public key.

• Trudy intercepts message, and sends Bob Trudy’s public key.

• Bob decrypts nonce with Trudy’s public key (thinking that he is using Alice’s public key), and inadvertently authenticates Trudy.

• While Bob is encrypting new data using Trudy’s public key, Trudy is busy posing as Bob to Alice. In particular, – Trudy transmits Bob’s

nonce to Alice– Alice transmits encrypted

nonce (encrypted using Alice’s private key).

– Trudy intercepts encrypted nonce, and asks Alice for her public key.

– Alice sends her public key

Page 19: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

19Security Matters

Man (Woman) in the Middle Attack

• Bob sends encrypted data (encrypted using Trudy’s public key)

• Trudy decrypts using her private key, and finds out Bob’s plain text.

• Trudy encrypts Bob’s plain text using Alice’s public key.

• Trudy transmits encrypted text to Alice. • Alice decrypts using her private key, and finds out

Bob’s plain text. • Alice and Bob are happy that they have had a

secure communication. They are ignorant of the fact that Trudy has intercepted and decrypted Bob’s message to Alice.

Page 20: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

20Security Matters

Public Key Certification

• PK cryptography – possible for two entities to exchange secret messages without having to exchange secret keys.

• Communicating entities have to exchange public keys (without being subject to “man in the middle attack”).

• Binding a public key to a particular entity is typically done by a Certification Authority (CA).

Page 21: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

21Security Matters

Certification Authority

• A CA verifies that an entity is who it claims to be.

• After verification, CA creates a certificate that binds the public key to appropriate entity.

• Certificate – includes a public key– includes globally unique identifying information

about owner of the public key– Is digitally signed by CA

Page 22: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

22Security Matters

Digital Signatures and Message Digests

• Assume Bob wants to digitally sign a “document,” m.

• Bob’s digital signature could be KB- (m)

• Due to complexity of RSA, digital signatures are applied to “fingerprints” instead of being applied to message m.

• Fingerprint – H(m) – where H denotes a “hash algorithm”

• Bob’s digital signature is KB- (H(m))

Page 23: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

23Security Matters

Message Digests

• Message Digest (Hash) algorithms:– MD5; SHA-1; SHA-224;-256;-384;-512

• Secure Hash Algorithm is a U.S. federal standard

• Required for use whenever a secure message digest algorithm is required for federal applications

• Produces a 160-bit message digest.

• Longer the output length, the more secure SHA-1

• SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512, (which despite the similarity of names), are actually fairly different algorithms to SHA-1 and have much wider safety margins.

Page 24: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

Management’s Role in Security

A framework to help managers understand that security rests on three cornerstones

Page 25: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

25Security Matters

Three Cornerstones

• Technology

• Organization

• Critical Infrastructure– Management should provide strong

leadership in all three areas.

Page 26: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

26Security Matters

Cornerstone: Technology

• Have an understanding/appreciation of technology– Firewalls– IDS/IPS systems– Antivirus/Security Patches– Physical security– Client/Server/Perimeter Security; Secure VPNs– Evaluation of potential technology acquisitions

based on their impact on security– Symmetric and Public Key Cryptography

Page 27: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

27Security Matters

Example: DDoS attack on iPremier Company

• IPremier– Sells luxury and rare high priced items on

Internet– Survived dot com implosion– Customers have good credit history with high

spending limits – Experienced a DDoS on Web Server– Ha Ha Ha! e-mails received by Help Desk

• Problems at Colocation facility: Qdata • iPremier employees could not get access to

Qdata’s Network Operations Center (NOC)

Page 28: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

28Security Matters

Questions

• About Qdata:• Although an early entrant in the industry, Qdata lost

any prospect of market leadership• Had not been quick to invest in advance technology• Had experienced difficulty in retaining qualified staff

• Questions:– If you were the CIO, how would you react to this

situation? – What implications does this situation have for the

iPremier company?

Page 29: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

29Security Matters

iPremier Example (Continued)

• Unable to determine extent of damage (firewall penetrated? How deep is the penetration?)

• Unable to determine if customer data was stolen (CIO’s main immediate concern)

• Unable to track (in a reasonable time frame) where ‘Ha, ha, ha’ e-mails received by “support” folks are originating

– Even if e-mail is tracked eventually – leads to another “Zombie

Page 30: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

30Security Matters

iPremier’s Response to Attack: Very Poor

• Try to shut down traffic from “Zombies” – didn’t work – for every zombie that was shut down – two new zombies joined the “party” automatically

• Shut down Web Server?

• Cost of downtime?

Page 31: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

31Security Matters

Imperative Need for Secure CommunicationCost of downtime

Page 32: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

32Security Matters

• Unable to determine if they should “disconnect the communication lines”

• initially CIO and CTO had discussion - may lose logging data that could help them figure out what happened (preserving evidence to find root cause of problem; and what to disclose publicly);

• later concluded that detailed logs have not been enabled

• Unable to determine if they should call “Seattle Police” or “FBI”?

iPremier’s Response to Attack: Very Poor

Page 33: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

33Security Matters

• How to handle PR (before info about security breach leaks out)?

• Unable to decide if all systems need to be rebuilt • Worst is over? Damage has been done?• Attack stopped after about 75 minutes – without any

intervention from iPremier or from Qdata!• FBI Calls iPremier?• Would system rebuild imply wiping out any remaining

proof of iPremier’s innocence?

iPremier’s Response to Attack: Very Poor

Page 34: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

34Security Matters

Some Business Implications for IPremier

• Web server unavailable to legitimate customers

• Cost of downtime?• Bad reputation for the business

• Lost customers• Loss of customer goodwill• Legal issues if customer data was

compromised

Page 35: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

35Security Matters

Some Business Implications for IPremier

• Impact on stock price• Unknown damages to the

network/business?• What if there was another attack?

Page 36: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

36Security Matters

Cornerstone: Organization

• Organizational characteristics – typically under the control of organization– Structure– Business environment– Culture– Policies and Responses– Standard Operating Procedures– Education, Training, and Awareness

Page 37: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

37Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Realize that total/perfect security is a myth

• Act appropriately, recognizing that security rests on three cornerstones

• Critical Asset Identification

• Initial Risk Assessment

• Risk Assessment as a continuous process

Page 38: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

38Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Creating a security team

• Initiate and actively participate in planning/design/documentation/ testing of security policy

• Actively involved in establishing standard operating procedures

Page 39: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

39Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Developing and maintaining an appropriate organizational culture

• Ensure employees are educated and trained regarding importance of following security policy

• Have an understanding of what each security tool proposed by IT team can do or cannot do

Page 40: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

40Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Have a good control environment– Physical controls– Data/Content control– Implementation control (outsourcing)– Operations/Administrative Control– Application Controls specific to individual

system components/applications

(e.g., Limiting e-mail attachments)

Page 41: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

41Security Matters

Cornerstone: Critical Infrastructure

• Infrastructure that are so vital that their damage or destruction would have a debilitating impact on the physical or economic security of the country– Telecommunications– Banking – Energy

Page 42: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

42Security Matters

Why should government/academic institutions/industry collaborate?

• In each other’s interestCI in large part is owned by the private sector, used by both private and public sectors, and protected in large part by public sector.

• Need to discuss problems and exchange ideas and solutions to cyber attacks/misuse

• Resource/cost/information sharing• Opportunity to play a role in the evolution of “best

practices”• Help shape legal and government policies in areas

of mutual concerns; Appropriate guidance for rapid additional protection measures

Page 43: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

43Security Matters

CERT Source: http://www.us-cert.gov/

Page 44: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

44Security Matters

What does CERT do?

Page 45: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

45Security Matters

Imperative Need for Secure CommunicationReported Security Incidents up to 1995

Source: CERT.ORG

Page 46: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

46Security Matters

Reported Security Incidents 1995 – 2003 Source: http://www.cert.org/present/cert-overview-trends/module-1.pdf

Page 47: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

47Security Matters

Why have cyber attacks been on the rise?Some reasons

Page 48: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

48Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Recognize that security requires an end-to-end view of business processes

• Achieve a balanced approach to security – one that does not solely focus on technological solutions

• Recognize that security is a socio-technical issue, and requires strong leadership from management

Page 49: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

49Security Matters

Management’s Role in Security

• Management ties everything together

• Responsibility

• Ownership

TechnologyInfrastructure

Organization

Management

Security is a Mindset, not a service. It must be a part of all decisions and implementations.

Page 50: Security Matters V.T. Raja, Ph.D., Oregon State University

50Security Matters

• Apply the Dutta/McCrohan framework and help iPremier’s management react appropriately to the security incident.