Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting July 13, 2016 · Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting July 13, 2016 Virginia Governor’s Office ... March 2016, April 2016 (TTAC) June 2016, and July

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY & HOMELAND SECURITY

Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting July 13, 2016

Virginia Governor’s Office Patrick Henry Building 1111 East Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 1



Welcome and Opening Remarks The Honorable Brian J. Moran, Chair

Secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security




New Member Introductions

Secure Commonwealth Panel Members




Adoption of Minutes

Secure Commonwealth Panel Members




Cyber Security Commission Report and

Discussion The Honorable Karen Jackson

Secretary of Technology




Unmanned Systems Commission Report

The Honorable Karen Jackson Secretary of Technology




Virginia Fusion Center Situation Report

Cpt. Steve Lambert Virginia State Police – Virginia Fusion Center


Traditional Roles

• Criminal Case Support • Information and Intelligence Sharing • All Crimes/All Hazards Mission(s)

– Criminal Activity Investigative Unit – Terrorism Investigative Unit – Gang Unit – Critical Infrastructure Protection Unit – Cyber Unit

OPEN SOURCE

Threat Landscape in the Information Revolution

OPEN SOURCE

Rapidly-Evolving Trends

Evolution of Threat • ISIS/HVEs • Immigration/Resettlement • DOC • VIMS • Dominion Power • Heroin • Social Media Research • Threat Mgmt • Field Analysts/Agents • JTTF

Impact to Capability • Training Issues • SINS • SAR • RFI • Command and Control • Geospatial Support • Predictive Policing

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Trends in Threat Communication: Social Media

• Classic Methods of Communication and News • Phone books, newspaper, etc • Traditional: News informed the public • Current: Everyone is a reporter – a symbiotic relationship

• Impact of Social Media on Threats • People communicating via text and/or social media

– Possibly reduces inhibitors – Impacts to public perception – Appears to be lack of consideration for validity of

information or credibility of sources


Social Media Threats • A Possible Reduction of Inhibitions

– Can be difficult to assess

• Opportunity to Share Message with Broad Audience – Can immediately access like minded individuals who may

encourage violent behavior

• Significant Challenge for Mass Gatherings/Protests – Internet cannot be “monitored”; thousands of social media sites

for which law enforcement accesses a small portion


Resource Challenges in Current Threat Environment

• Significant proliferation of threats and activity on social media “Virtual surveillance” requires personnel and tools to monitor – Resources are pulled from other taskings to manage threats and

public safety concerns – Massive number of incidents exhausts field, operational, and

analytical resources – Real time information creates challenge to manage concerns:

• More personnel are required to respond to incidents as a continual influx of information keeps public apprised of incidents almost as soon as they occur

• Technologically connected society means events in other locations outside of state create a possible impact to Virginia




VDOT and Hurricane Planning

Scott Smizik Virginia Department of Transportation


Secure Commonwealth Panel | July 2016

Hampton Roads Crossing Study Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Purpose of Today’s Briefing • Provide an update on

the status of the study

• Discuss analysis included in SEIS

• Review next steps and major milestones



Study Status



Agency/Locality Coordination – To Date Cooperating Agency Meetings

• Monthly since August 2015 • Reviewed methodologies • Concurred on the Purpose and

Need • Concurred on alternatives

retained for analysis • Reviewed and commented on

technical reports

Agency Meetings • July 2015 • December 2015 • February 2016 • May 2016

Board/Council Briefings • Hampton Roads Transportation

Planning Organization (HRTPO): July 2015, December 2015, March 2016, April 2016 (TTAC) June 2016, and July 2016 (CTAC)

• Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission (HRTAC): July and December 2015

• Hampton City Council: December 2015

• James City County Board of Supervisors: May 2016

• Newport News City Council: April



Public Outreach – To Date Citizen Information Meetings/Comment Periods

• Solicited comments during study kickoff (June 2015)

• CIMs were held in July and December 2015

• Comment forms/court reporters available at CIMs

• Surveys/comment periods during/after each CIM

Property Access and Other Letters • Property access letters - September and

December 2015 • Suffolk/Portsmouth boating survey –

February 2016 • Responding to related requests for

additional information

Web Site and Email Updates • Monthly updates and opportunity to

submit comments and sign up for email updates



Study Progress

• All technical documents and pre-Draft SEIS completed and distributed to Cooperating Agencies

• Technical documents and pre-Draft SEIS continue to be reviewed and refined

• Anticipate publishing the Draft SEIS in early August



Analysis: Process and Results



Three Tiers of Analysis Engineering Sections

Operationally Independent Sections

Alternatives



Sections that comprise the alternatives retained for analysis



Operationally Independent Sections (OIS) • OIS can be implemented as individual projects with separate

Records of Decision (RODs)

• OIS presented in SEIS show conservative implementation

• Final number and size of OIS would be determined by RODs

OIS included in Draft SEIS: • I-664 from I-264 to US 58 • I-664 from US 58 to VA 164 • I-664 from VA 164 to Terminal

Avenue Exit • I-664 from MMMBT/Terminal Avenue

Exit to I-64 • VA 164

• I-64 from I-664 to Mallory Street Exit • I-64 from Mallory Street Exit to I-564 • I-564, I-564 Connector, and I-664

Connector • I-564, I-564 Connector, and VA 164

Connector



Alternative A • Includes improvements to I-64

between I-664 and I-564

• Would result in a consistent six-lane facility

• Improvements to

HRBT would be



Alternative B Includes: • I-64/HRBT

• I-564

• I-564 Connector

• Route 164 Connector

• Route 164



Alternative C Includes: • I-664

• I-664/I-564 Connectors

• I-564

• Route 164 Connector



Alternative D • Includes all components of Alternatives B and C

• Applies a more narrow footprint than Alternative C

• The different footprint allows for more information and options to be available to the study



Used INRIX data to identify typical weekday bottleneck locations for travel demand analysis:

1. HRBT 2. I-564 3. MMBT 4. I-664 Bowers Hill

Impact of alternatives were analyzed at each location

3 1

2

4



0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Travel Time (EB) Travel Time (WB)

No Build (2034)A (2034)B (2034)C (2034)D (2034)

31%

Dec

reas

e 31

% D

ecre

ase

27%

Dec

reas

e 42

% D

ecre

ase

1. I-64 PM Peak Travel Time Comparison as % Change from

the No Build

Min

utes

29%

Dec

reas

e

33%

Dec

reas

e 31

% D

ecre

ase

49%

Dec

reas

e



0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


No BuildABCD

2. I-564 AM Peak Travel Time Comparison as % Change from the No

Build

Min

utes

No

Chan

ge

No

Chan

ge

33%

incr

ease

100%

incr

ease

67%

incr

ease

67%

incr

ease

67%

incr

ease

33%

incr

ease



0

5

10

15

20

25


No BuildABCD

3. I-664 PM Peak Travel Time Comparison as % Change from the

No Build M

inut

es

19%

dec

reas

e

43%

dec

reas

e 43

% d

ecre

ase

23%

dec

reas

e 23

% d

ecre

ase

41%

dec

reas

e 46

% d

ecre

ase

14%

dec

reas

e



0

2

4

6

8

10

12


No BuildABCD

4. I-664 PM Peak Travel Time Comparison as % Change from the No

Build

Min

utes

13%

dec

reas

e

No

Chan

ge

No

Chan

ge

30%

dec

reas

e

10%

dec

reas

e 10

% d

ecre

ase

13%

dec

reas

e

30%

dec

reas

e



Moving Forward



Milestone Schedule • August 2016: Draft SEIS published for public review

• Notice of Availability published in Federal Register coupled with local announcements

• 45-day public comment period • September 2016: Location Public Hearings

• Held towards the end of the 45-day comment period • Located on Peninsula and Southside

• October & November 2016: Commonwealth Transportation Board

• Board will be briefed on recommended preferred alternative in October • Anticipate formal action during November meeting

• Spring/Summer 2017: Final SEIS published • Similar publication as Draft SEIS

• Summer 2017: First Record of Decision (ROD)



For more information and/or future updates

Visit: www.HamptonRoadsCrossingSt

udy.org or

Email: [email protected]

http://www.hamptonroadscrossingstudy.org/http://www.hamptonroadscrossingstudy.org/mailto:[email protected]



Health Working Group: Strategy and Zika

Dr. Marissa Levine State Health Commissioner, Department of Health


37

Zika Virus Disease – Basics

• Spread to people primarily through bite of infected Aedes mosquitoes

• Other modes of transmission: sexual, maternal-fetal • Common symptoms: Fever, rash, joint pain and

conjunctivitis • Usually a mild illness, lasting several days to 1 week • Most infected persons do not get sick • Infection during pregnancy can cause a serious birth

defect called microcephaly, and other severe fetal brain defects which have life-long impact.

38

Estimated range of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the US, 2016

39

Virginia’s Preparedness Efforts

• Virginia Zika Task Force established

• Human disease surveillance initiated

• Laboratory testing available

• Mosquito surveillance initiated

• Ongoing education and guidance to Virginians

• Guidance to clinicians regularly updated

Zika Task Force Commissioner VDH

Mosquito Control

Task Group

Blood/Tissue Safety Task

Group

Human Surveillance Task Group

Maternity Health Task

Group

Communications Task Group

Clinician Outreach Task

Group

Virginia Zika Task Force

Lead: American Red Cross

Virginia Blood Services

Lead: Virginia Mosquito Control

Association

Lead: VDH OEPI

Lead: VDH OEPI

DGS DCLS VDH Office of Family Health

Services

Others

DVS

DBHDS

VACO

DOE

SCHEV

VHHA

MSV

VML

Lead: VDH ORCE

Office of the Governor

VDH OEP VDEM Lt. Governor’s Office Representative

DGS

Governor’s Office Representative

VDACS

DCR

VDH OEPI

VDOF

VDGIF

LEGEND: BHDS: Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and

Developmental Services DCLS: Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services DCR: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation DGS: Virginia Department of General Services DOE: Virginia Department of Education DVS: Virginia Department of Veterans Services OEP: Office of Emergency Preparedness OEPI: Office of Epidemiology ORCE: Office of Risk Communications and Education SCHEV: State Council of Higher Education for Virginia VACO: Virginia Association of Counties VCU Health: Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center VDEM: Virginia Department of Emergency Management VDH: Virginia Department of Health VDOF: Virginia Department of Forestry VDGIF: Virginia Department of Games and Inland Fisheries VHHA: Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association VML: Virginia Municipal League

State agency Private Sector

Non-governmental organization

Input from all Task Groups

41

Testing Virginia Residents for Zika Virus Virginia Residents Approved for Zika Testing between 1/29/2016 and 7/06/2016

59%16%

11%

4% 10%

NorthernCentralEasternSouthwestNorthwest

Virginia Residents Approved for Testing by Region

Case Status Num %

Confirmed/Probable case 33 4

Not a case 670 77

Test results pending 146 17

Test declined 19 2

Chart1

Northern

Central

Eastern

Southwest

Northwest

59%

514

142

99

30

83

Sheet1

Total

RegionPregnantNon-pregnant

Central582

Eastern245

Northwest235

Northern21113

Southwest71

Total32326

Total

RegionPregnantNon-pregnant

Central58260

Eastern24529

Northwest23528

Northern21113224

Southwest718

Total32326349

Central60Northern514

Eastern29Central142

Northwest28Eastern99

Northern224Southwest30

Southwest8Northwest83

868

Sheet1

Sheet2

Sheet3

42

Mosquito control guided by mosquito surveillance & arboviral testing

Mosquito control guided by mosquito surveillance only

Military installations having mosquito surveillance & control capability

Fort Myers & the Pentagon, Arlington County

Fort Belvoir, Fairfax County

Langley AFB, Hampton

Fort Eustis, Newport News

Virginia Jurisdictions and Military Installations having Mosquito Control

Capabilities

Mosquito control programs are mostly found in some of Virginia’s most heavily populated jurisdictions.

43

Public Messaging/Communication

http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/

www.ZikaVA.org

http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/http://www.zikava.org/

44

Zika Messaging Multimedia Approach

• Leave-Behind Printed Material • Clinician Outreach • 3 Animated Videos • (English & Spanish) • TV, Radio and Movie Theaters • Airport Signage • Social Media Campaign • Zika Prevention Kits

45

Zika Table top Exercise

• June 17, 2016: Mosquito (Vector) Control • Zika task force • VDH LeadershipTeam • 5 local health districts

• Tabletop Exercise Template • Available for other jurisdictions to use • http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/emergen

cy-preparedness/training-education/

http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/emergency-preparedness/training-education/http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/emergency-preparedness/training-education/

46 Data Source: Virginia Department of Health Plan for Wellbeing, January 2016

http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/Administration/VPfWB/

http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/Administration/VPfWB/

47

Thank you! Summary/Questions?



Public Comment/Panel Discussion




Closing Remarks

The Honorable Brian J. Moran, Chair


Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting�July 13, 2016Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Traditional RolesThreat Landscape in the Information RevolutionRapidly-Evolving TrendsTrends in Threat Communication: Social MediaSocial Media ThreatsResource Challenges in Current Threat EnvironmentSlide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Zika Virus Disease – BasicsEstimated range of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the US, 2016Virginia’s Preparedness EffortsSlide Number 40Testing Virginia Residents for Zika VirusSlide Number 42Public Messaging/CommunicationZika Messaging Multimedia ApproachZika Table top ExerciseSlide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49

Documents

Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting July 13, 2016 · Secure Commonwealth Panel Meeting July 13, 2016 Virginia Governor’s Office ... March 2016, April 2016 (TTAC) June 2016, and July