Upload
taima
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Secrecy Capacity Scaling of Large-Scale Cognitive Networks. Yitao Chen 1 , Jinbei Zhang 1 , Xinbing Wang 1 , Xiaohua Tian 1 , Weijie Wu 1 , Fan Fu 2 , Chee Wei Tan 3 1 Dept. of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Secrecy Capacity Scaling of Large-Scale Cognitive Networks
Yitao Chen1, Jinbei Zhang1, Xinbing Wang1,
Xiaohua Tian1, Weijie Wu1, Fan Fu2, Chee Wei Tan3
1 Dept. of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
2 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
3 Dept. of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong
2
Outline Introduction
Network Model and Definition
Independent Eavesdroppers
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Conclusion
Motivations Security is a major concern in wireless networks
3
Mobile Payment Virtual Property
Privacy Military Communication
4
Motivations
Physical Layer Security Assume eavesdroppers
have infinite computation power
Require the intended receiver should have a stronger channel than eavesdroppers
Provable security capacity
Cryptographic methods Key distribution
Rapid growth of computation power
Improvement on
decoding technology
log(1 ) log(1 )eC SNR SNR
5
Related works
Secrecy capacity in large-scale networks Guard zone [9] Artificial noise + Fading gain (CSI needed) [8] Using artificial noise generated by receivers to suppress
eavesdroppers’ channel quality [11]
[9] O. Koyluoglu, E. Koksal, E. Gammel, “On Secrecy Capacity Scaling in Wireless Networks”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, May 2012.
[8] S. Vasudevan, D. Goeckel and D. Towsley, “Security-capacity Trade-off in Large Wireless Networks using Keyless Secrecy,” in Proc. ACM MobiHoc, Chicago, Illinois, USA, Sept. 2010.
[11] J. Zhang, L. Fu, X. Wang, “Asymptotic analysis on secrecy capacity in large-scale wireless networks,” in IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., Feb. 2014.
Cited from [8]
6
Motivations
Limited spectrum resources and CR networks
Key questions:
What is the impact of security in cognitive networks?
What is the performance we can achieve?
7
Outline Introduction
Network Model and Definition
Independent Eavesdroppers
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Conclusion
8
Network Model and Definition – I/III
Network Area: a square Legitimate Nodes
primary users , secondary users I.I.D
Self-interference cancelation [17] adopted CSI unknown
Eavesdroppers eavesdroppers Location positions unknown CSI unknown
Cited from [17]
[17] J. I. Choiy, M. Jainy, K. Srinivasany, P. Levis and S. Katti, “Achieving Single Channel, Full Duplex Wireless Communication”, in ACM Mobicom’10, Chicago, USA, Sept. 2010.
9
Network Model and Definition – II/III
Random permutation traffic, no cross network traffic Communication Model
Physical Model: Primary user i transmits to primary user j
Define the physical model for secondary users and eavesdroppers similarly.
Interference from other primary TXs Interference from other primary RXs
Interference from secondary TXs Interference from secondary TXs
10
Network Model and Definition – III/III
Definition of Per Hop Secrecy Throughput: Independent eavesdropper
Colluding eavesdroppers
Definition of Asymptotic Capacity
Similarly, we can define the asymptotic per-node capacity for the secondary network
, if
11
Outline Introduction
Network Model and Definition
Independent Eavesdroppers
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Conclusion
12
Independent Eavesdroppers
Physical Feasibility of Security Primary Networks and Secondary Networks and Operation Rules:
• Primary users disregard secondary users;• Secondary users should affect primary users little.
Successful transmission No eavesdropper can decode the message
13
Independent Eavesdroppers
Intuitive Primary Networks
Concurrent Transmission Range
Secrecy Capacity
Secondary Networks Unknown ? Good or bad for primary nodes
? Good or bad for eavesdroppers Depend on SUs’ locations
14
Independent Eavesdroppers
Primary T-R pair (node i to node j)• For other primary transmitter k and receiver l
• For other secondary transmitter k and receiver l
15
Independent Eavesdroppers
Scheduling scheme Cell Partition Round-Robin Scheduling:
• Tessellate the network into cells.• Different cells take turn to transmit.• Secondary users can transmit in non-occupied cells with the
guarantee of affecting primary transmissions little.
Figure: Simple 9-TDMA
Routing schemeHighway System
– Draining Phase– Highway Phase– Delivery Phase
Bottleneck: Highway Phase (nodes need to relay packets for others) Distance of primary T-R pairs is 1.
Secrecy Capacity is for primary network. Secrecy Capacity is for secondary network.
16
Independent Eavesdroppers
No order cost comparing to the scenario without security concern!
17
Outline Introduction
Network Model and Definition
Independent Eavesdroppers
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Difference with previous case
Conclusion
SINR of Colluding Eavesdroppers– maximum ratio combining of SINR
Bound the SINR of eavesdroppers:Disjoint rings with same size.Eavesdroppers in the same ring has a
similar SINR.Artificial noise + Path loss gain +
Cooperation
18
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Choice of Concurrent Transmission Range kk , artificial noise , throughputk , SINR of eavesdroppers , security
19
when choosing and is a constant.
20
Colluding Eavesdroppers
Result comparison
Cooperation in cognitive networks helps to increase secrecy capacity, compared to stand-alone networks [11].
[11] J. Zhang, L. Fu, X. Wang, “Asymptotic analysis on secrecy capacity in large-scale wireless networks,” to appear in IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 2013.
21
Outline Introduction
Network Model and Definition
Independent Eavesdroppers’ Case
Colluding Eavesdroppers’ Case
Conclusion
22
Conclusion
In this paper, we study physical layer security in cognitive networks.
Our scheme adopting self-interference cancellation is very efficient.
Cooperation between secondary network and primary network in CR networks can help to strengthen physical layer security.
Thank you !