SECOND Letter to T Hansen Prior to Inform of Intent to Seek Proponents

8/2/2019 SECOND Letter to T Hansen Prior to Inform of Intent to Seek Proponents

1/3

Edward C. NoonanPresident 2012

American Independent Party1713 11th Ave

Olivehurst, CA 95961(530) 845-5186 [email protected]

http://noonan4president.blogspot.com

March 30, 2012Yuba County Voter RegistrarAttn: Terry Hansen, Registrar of Voters915 8th St. Suite 107,Marysville, CA 95901

Dear Ms. Hansen:

Thank you for your quick response to my letter dated March 28, 2012. I appreciate your attemptat being of service to me in this matter. However, your response was unsatisfactory to me andthese are my reasons.

You stated in your last letter, As I have indicated to you in previous correspondence the localregistrar of voters is not the individual that certifies candidates for the office of President ofthe United States. Again, the proper process to challenge the qualifications of a specificindividual for the office of President of the United States is through a writ of mandate and thevenue for such a proceeding shall be exclusively in Sacramento County with the Secretary of

State as a Respondent.

It is my opinion that you are only partially correct and we dont need no stinkin court! OurCalifornia State Constitution states it well.

It guarantees the following:

Article II

SECTION 1. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for

their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when

the public good may require.

SECTION 13. Recall is the power of the electors to remove an elective officer.

I am displeased with the present corrupt Court system. Not a single court has allowed cases likemine to be heard on their merits. Instead, every one of the cases against Mr. Bari Shabazz; a/k/a

Mr. Barry Soetoro; a/k/a Mr. Barack Hussein Obama has been dismissed without a fair hearingand discovery. Yes, I am litigating a case in Sacramento as per Elections Code 13314 but I havenothing but contempt for the courts handling of the serious Constitutional issues that we are

bringing before the bench.

You claim that you have no duty to vet ineligible candidates. Federal law directs you to complywith the following:

Section 73.1940 [47 CFR 73.1940] Legally qualified candidates for public office.(a) A legally qualified candidate for public office is any person who:
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://noonan4president.blogspot.com/http://noonan4president.blogspot.com/http://noonan4president.blogspot.com/mailto:[email protected]


2/3

(1) Has publicly announced his or her intention to run for nomination or office;

(2) Is qualified under theapplicable local, State or Federal law to hold the office for which he or

she is a candidate; and

(3) Has met the qualifications set forth in either paragraph (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section.

(b) A person seeking election to any public office including that of President or Vice President of

the United States, or nomination for any public office except that of President or Vice President,

by means of a primary, general or special election, shall be considered a legally qualifiedcandidate if, in addition to meeting the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, that

person:

(1) Has qualified for a place on the ballot; or

(2) Has publicly committed himself or herself to seeking election by the write-in method and is

eligible under applicable law to be voted for by sticker, by writing in his or her name on the

ballot or by other method, and makes a substantial showing that he or she is a bona fide

candidate for nomination or office.

(c) A person seeking election to the office of President or Vice President of the United States

shall , for the purposes of the Communications Act and the rules in 47 CFR chapter I, be considered legally qualified candidates only in those States or territories (or the District of

Columbia) in which they have met the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this

section: Except, that any such person who has met the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a)

and (b) of this section in at least 10 States (or 9 and the District of Columbia) shall be considered

a legally qualified candidate for election in all States, territories, and the District of Columbia for

the purposes of this Act.

(d) A person seeking nomination to any public office, except that of President or Vice President of

the United States, by means of a convention, caucus or similar procedure, shall be considered a

legally qualified candidate if, in addition to meeting the requirements set forth in paragraph (a)

of this section, that person makes a substantial showing that he or she is a bona fide candidate

for such nomination: Except, that no person shall be considered a legally qualified candidate fornomination by the means set forth in this paragraph prior to 90 days before the beginning of the

convention, caucus or similar procedure in which he or she seeks nomination.

(e) A person seeking nomination for the office of President or Vice President of the United States

shall, for the purposes of the Communications Act and the rules thereunder, be considered a

legally qualified candidate only in those States or territories (or the District of Columbia) in

which, in addition to meeting the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section:

(1) He or she, or proposed delegates on his or her behalf, have qualified for the primary or

Presidential preference ballot in that State, territory or the District of Columbia; or

(2) He or she has made a substantial showing of a bona fide candidacy for such nomination inthat State, territory or the District of Columbia; except, that any such person meeting the

requirements set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section in at least 10 States (or 9 and

the District of Columbia) shall be considered a legally qualified candidate for nomination in all

States, territories and the District of Columbia for purposes of this Act.

(f) The term "substantial showing" of a bona fide candidacy as used in paragraphs (b), (d) and

(e) of this section means evidence that the person claiming to be a candidate has engaged to a

substantial degree in activities commonly associated with political campaigning. Such activities

normally would include making campaign speeches, distributing campaign literature, issuing

press releases, maintaining a campaign committee, and establishing campaign headquarters


3/3

(even though the headquarters in some instances might be the residence of the candidate or his or

her campaign manager). Not all of the listed activities are necessarily required in each case to

demonstrate a substantial showing, and there may be activities not listed herein which would

contribute to such a showing.

[43 FR 32795, July 28, 1978, as amended at 43 FR 45856, Oct. 4, 1978; 43 FR 55769, Nov. 29,

1978; 45 FR 26066, Apr. 17, 1980; 45 FR 28141, Apr. 28, 1980; 57 FR 208, Jan. 3, 1992; 57 FR

27708, June 22, 1992]

As you see from the above FEDERAL LAW a president must comply with LOCALQUALIFICATIONS and prove his qualifications. There in deed local duties that you mustperform for Presidential Write-In Candidates.

For instance, for local write-in candidates for the Office of President are you not required to:

CA Election Code 8600. Every person who desires to be a write-in candidate and have his or her

name as written on the ballot of an election counted for a particular office shall file:

(a) A statement of write-in candidacy that contains the following information:

(1) Candidate's name.

(2) Residence address.

(3) A declaration stating that he or she is a write-in candidate.

(4) The title of the office for which he or she is running.

(5) The party nomination which he or she seeks, if running in a partisan primary election.

(6) The date of the election.

(7) A certification of the candidate's complete voter registration

and party affiliation/preference history for the preceding 10 years,

or for as long as he or she has been eligible to vote in the state

if less than 10 years, if running for a voter-nominated office.

(8) For any of the offices described in Section 13.5, a statement that the candidate meets the

statutory and constitutional requirements for that office as described in that section.

So as you can see, this is what you will need to defend yourself against when your recall has begun. I would

prefer, however, that we can work together and see if there is some way that you can insure that every singlecandidate you certify to go on the 2012 California ballot and that Yuba County voters will be voting on, willindeed be QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.

I appreciate you forwarding my last letter to the District Attorney. I am hoping he will do his job andinvestigate the criminal activities of forged birth certificates, forged Social Security numbers and forgedSelective Service registration cards of Mr. Soetoro. If the DA has been asleep for the last 3 years and doesnot know what is happening regarding the questions of the bogus qualifications of Mr. Shabazz, aka, Soetoro,Obama then he needs to GOOGLE the subjectElse sent him a copy of this press release that I have enclosed. Iam planning part of the RECALL campaign to include the RECALL every District Attorney and Sheriffs inCalifornia as well. My demand to you, the district attorney, and the sheriff of Yuba County is this: prove or haveMr. Soetoro prove he is who he says he isand PROVE he is a citizen of the United States! No more photo-

shopped garbage on the whitehouse.gov webpage! Do your friggin job! Vet him OR GET RECALLED!

Respectfully,

Edward C. NoonanPresident 2012Enclosure: March 28, 2012 Press ReleaseECN/ecn

Documents

SECOND Letter to T Hansen Prior to Inform of Intent to Seek Proponents