Upload
ngodien
View
226
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical Imperative
Second Formulation of The CategoricalImperative
the Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Dr. Clea F. Rees
Centre for Lifelong LearningCardiff University
Spring 2011
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeOutline
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Outline
Organisational
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
AutonomyToby, Peter & AppendicitisAutonomous Beings & RationalityAutonomous Beings, Rationality & PersonhoodRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Notes
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeOrganisational
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Organisational
I please hand in as applicable:I one copy of response to prompt 5
I available to collect:I responses to prompt 4
I questions, comments & concerns
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:
i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.
I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:
i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:
i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:
i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeFormula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)
Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself (FHEI)Always act so as to treat rational beings as ends in themselves, andnever merely as means.
I Respect people.I Don’t “use” people.
I This is Kant’s second statement of The CategoricalImperative:i.e. of the single, comprehensive ethical principle;
i.e. of the “Only Guide You Need!”
I Kant claims the FHEI and FUL are equivalent.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
I FHEI is a test one uses to determine one’s duty.
I One uses it to decide whether a maxim is morally acceptableor not.
I Hence, one can decide whether an action is morally acceptableor not.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
I FHEI is a test one uses to determine one’s duty.I One uses it to decide whether a maxim is morally acceptable
or not.
I Hence, one can decide whether an action is morally acceptableor not.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
I FHEI is a test one uses to determine one’s duty.I One uses it to decide whether a maxim is morally acceptable
or not.I Hence, one can decide whether an action is morally acceptable
or not.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?
1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.
2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?
1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.
2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.
2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as means
I WRONG3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more
— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herself
I O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeApplying FHEI: Determining One’s Duty
Friends, Ends & the Cinema
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Applying FHEI: Determining One’s DutyFriends, Ends & the Cinema
Is it permissible to ask your friend to go to the cinema with you?
Applying FHEI:Why would you be asking?1. you’d really rather go alone, but think SHE’d enjoy the film.
I O.K.2. know she’ll hate but, but YOU don’t want to go alone
I treating her merely as meansI WRONG
3. know SHE’ll enjoy it — one reason; also YOU’ll enjoy it more— second reason
I treating her as means, but not merely — also as end in herselfI O.K.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Toby, Peter & Appendicitis
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyToby, Peter & Appendicitis
What, if anything, justifies the different responses?
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
AutonomyOne has the capacity for autonomy if one is capable of makingdecisions about one’s own life.
To be able to do this, one must be capable of reasoning and ofunderstanding, within reasonable limits, information and options— that is, one must be rational.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
AutonomyOne has the capacity for autonomy if one is capable of makingdecisions about one’s own life.
To be able to do this, one must be capable of reasoning and ofunderstanding, within reasonable limits, information and options— that is, one must be rational.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
I Who has it?
I you, me, all healthy adult human beings, maybe some othersI Who doesn’t?
I goldfish, oak trees, cats, dogs, small children, some adulthumans & hedgehogs
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
I Who has it?I you, me, all healthy adult human beings, maybe some others
I Who doesn’t?
I goldfish, oak trees, cats, dogs, small children, some adulthumans & hedgehogs
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
I Who has it?I you, me, all healthy adult human beings, maybe some others
I Who doesn’t?
I goldfish, oak trees, cats, dogs, small children, some adulthumans & hedgehogs
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
I Who has it?I you, me, all healthy adult human beings, maybe some others
I Who doesn’t?I goldfish, oak trees, cats, dogs, small children, some adult
humans & hedgehogs
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings & Rationality
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings & Rationality
Autonomous BeingsAll rational beings have autonomy; no non-rational beings have it.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
I Who counts as a ‘person’?
I Who doesn’t?
PersonA being is a person if, and only if, the being is rational.
Autonomous BeingsAll, and only, persons, have autonomy.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
I Who counts as a ‘person’?I Who doesn’t?
PersonA being is a person if, and only if, the being is rational.
Autonomous BeingsAll, and only, persons, have autonomy.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
I Who counts as a ‘person’?I Who doesn’t?
PersonA being is a person if, and only if, the being is rational.
Autonomous BeingsAll, and only, persons, have autonomy.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Autonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyAutonomous Beings, Rationality & Personhood
I Who counts as a ‘person’?I Who doesn’t?
PersonA being is a person if, and only if, the being is rational.
Autonomous BeingsAll, and only, persons, have autonomy.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.
I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.
I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.
I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.
I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.
I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.
I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.
I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeAutonomy
Respecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
AutonomyRespecting Persons as Ends in Themselves
Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves
I Treating persons as ends in themselves, and never merely asmeans, requires
I respecting them as persons.I Respecting persons involves
I respecting their autonomy.I Respecting persons’ autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their autonomy.I Allowing persons to exercise their autonomy involves
I allowing them to exercise their capacity to make their owndecisions.
b
Second Formulation of The Categorical ImperativeNotes
Virtue
Vice
Moral
Imm
oral
Ethical
Unethica
lPe
rmissi
bleImpermissible
Notes