16631.001/9999/3000

OUT OF THE QUAGMIRE: SEC ADOPTS

CROWDFUNDING RULES, AND OTHER

DEVELOPMENTS UNDER THE JOBS ACT

November 2015

2 16631.001/9999/3000

Prepared By:

Thomas More Griffin (tgriffin@bryantrabbino.com)

Denver Edwards (denveredwards@bryantrabbino.com)

B. Seth Bryant (seth@bryantrabbino.com)

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act’) was signed into law

by President Obama on April 5, 2012. The JOBS Act has key, substantial provisions that

govern exempt and registered offerings, initial public offerings (“IPOs”) and issuer

reporting requirements. The main purpose of the legislation is to enhance the capital

raising of small and medium sized businesses and thereby to enable and assist startups

and venture capital companies in raising funds from stakeholders, which in turn will

create and increase jobs. The JOBS Act also assists those companies that traditionally

have had difficulty raising money from banks and other traditional financial lenders. The

JOBS Act has positively effected capital raising by small and medium sized companies.

And after small companies and investors waited over two years for the Securities and

Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) to finalize crowdfunding rules, the

SEC issued final rules on October 30, 2015. These rules will be effective by the end of

May 2016, except that certain regulations relating to forming funding portals will be

effective January 29, 2016. SEC Chair Mary Jo White stated in the crowdfunding

adoption release that “There is a great deal of enthusiasm in the marketplace for

crowdfunding, and I believe these rules and proposed amendments provide smaller

companies with innovative ways to raise capital and give investors the protections they

need…” It should also be noted that on October 30, 2015, the SEC proposed

3 16631.001/9999/3000

amendments to Securities Act Rule 147 and Rule 504 of Regulation D to facilitate

intrastate and regional securities offerings.

The JOBS Act consists of six principal parts or Titles. This article focuses mainly on

developments in the first four Titles. Title I creates a new class of registrants – Emerging

Growth Companies (“EGCs”) – that may file their draft IPO registration statement with the SEC

on a confidential basis for staff review. EGCs have reduced disclosure requirements, no

restrictions on test-the-market communications with qualified institutional buyers (“QIBs”) and

institutional accredited investors (“AIs”) before and after the filing of their IPO registration

statement, and relaxed requirements regarding compensation disclosure and analyst research

relating to the offering.

Title II of the JOBS Act eliminates the prohibition on general solicitation and general

advertising in Rule 506(c) private placement offerings (under Regulation D of the Securities Act

of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act” or the “Securities Act”)) when securities sales are only

made to AIs and Rule 144A investors.

Title III of the JOBS Act is the crowdfunding provision that creates an exemption from

the registration requirements of the federal securities laws for small offerings of securities.

Crowdfunding is a novel, seed stage capital raising provision at the heart of the JOBS Act,

designed to facilitate small securities offerings by small companies whose investors are not

likely to be AIs.

Title IV creates the Regulation A+ offering exemption for interstate offerings up to $50

million with enhanced disclosure requirements. Regulation A+ offerings may be viewed as quasi

public offerings.

4 16631.001/9999/3000

Titles V and VI amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange

Act”), principally to raise, from 500 to 2,000 beneficial owners, the threshold for the number of

beneficial owners of a company’s equity securities triggering registration obligations under the

Exchange Act.

Below is a chart comparing the JOBS Act provisions and regulations relating to

Regulation A+, Rule 506(c), and crowdfunding offerings. It should be noted that SEC

regulations relating to EGCs, Regulation A+ offerings and Rule 506(c) offerings to AIs and

QIBs using general advertising and general solicitation have been adopted. SEC regulations

regarding crowdfunding were adopted October 30, 2015.

Provision Reg A+ Reg D/ Rule 506(c)* Crowdfunding*

Maximum Offering Amount Tier 1 -- $20 million

Tier 2 -- $50 million

Unlimited $1,000,000

Offeree Types All, including non-accredited

investors

Accredited Investors Only All – Special rules for

Unaccredited Investors

Individual Investment Limits

on Investors

Per Offering: greater of 10%

of income or 10% of net

worth

None All offerings (over 12 mos.):

greater of $2,000 or 5% of lesser

of annual income or net worth (if

either annual income or net worth

below $100,000); and 10% of

lesser of annual income or net

worth, not to exceed maximum

sales of $100,000 (if both annual

income and net worth is equal to

or more than $100,000)

Investor Verification Self-Certification Heightened Accredited

Investor Verification;

Financial Information

Required; No “Bad Actors”

in offering

Self-certification

Advertising/General

Solicitation

Unrestricted Unrestricted Limited to notices; all must occur

on internet

Pre-filing/test the waters Testing the waters allowed

with no pre-filing; must file

solicitation materials with

first offering statement;

offering circular must be filed

48 hours prior to first sale

No filing requirements (yet) Pre-filing with SEC required

before any offer (no testing the

waters)

Closing Speed Slow – SEC Approval Fast – No SEC Involvement Medium – SEC Pre-Filing

5 16631.001/9999/3000

Required Required

Offering Documents Strong – SEC Approval

Required

No Specific Requirements Medium – SEC Pre-Filing

Required

Financial Disclosure Audited Financials No Specific Requirements Limited financial disclosure for

offerings under $100,000;

Reviewed $100,000 - $500,000;

Audited above $500,000

Ongoing Disclosure/Filing Annual, Semi-Annual,

Current Reports including

audited financials

None. Companies have to

file a Form D with the SEC.

Annual Disclosure & Financials

Termination of Ongoing

Reporting

Less than 300 holders of Reg

A+ stock

N/A Retirement of all Crowdfunded

Securities

Transfer Restrictions None Restricted Securities. 1 Year;

none for Rule 144A sales to

QIBs

1 Year or to Issuer or Accredited

Investor

Shareholder Limit 2,000 persons or 500

unaccredited investors

2,000 accredited investors Unlimited

Intermediary None Required None Required Funding Portal or Broker-Dealer

Required; Internet Portal Required

State Preemption Tier 1 – comply with state

blue sky laws

Tier 2 – no need to comply

with state blue sky laws for

sales to “qualified

purchasers”

Yes. Exempt as “covered

security” under Section 18 of

1933 Act. Section 18 (c) (2)

(A) of the 1933 Act permits

states to require notice filings.

Yes, but must make filing in home

state and any state with greater

than 50% of crowdfunders

Liability Section 12(a)(2) of 1933 Act

and Rule 10b-5 of 1934 Act

liability

Rule 10b-5 of 1934 Act

liability

Portal Liability; Burden of Proof

for “Diligence Defense” is on

Issuer. Rule 10b-5 liability for

Issuer

Investor Tests/Requirements None Accredited Investor testing

verification requirements

higher than prior reasonable

belief

Test Required

* Note that the proposed SEC crowdfunding and Regulation D rules (both of which are discussed herein) have not yet been adopted.

The above chart was adapted from the chart set forth in the Crowd Fund Insider article, “The Reg A+ Bombshell:

$50M Unaccredited Equity Crowdfunding Title IV takes Center Stage”, published on March 25, 2015. http://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2015/03/65007-the-reg-a-bombshell-50m-unaccredited-equity-crowdfunding-

title-iv-takes-center-stage/.

Investment bankers are warming up to the JOBS Act, according to a survey released by

BDO USA LLP in July 2015.1 The BDO report highlights that 51% of the 100 bankers surveyed

believe that the JOBS Act has had a positive effect for IPOs, up from 14% two years ago. They

are viewing the JOBS Act’s positive impact on IPOs and private placements, and are taking

advantage of the Act to grow these businesses.

Recently, at a PLI conference on securities regulation held in New York City at the end

of October 2015, members of the SEC commented that:

1 https://www.bdo.com/news/2015-july/investment-bankers-warming-to-jobs-act.

6 16631.001/9999/3000

approximately 1,000 EGC IPO filings have been made to date;

regarding Regulation A+ offerings, 34 companies have filed offering statements,

16 of which have made confidential non-public filings; the SEC qualified three

offerings;

for the year ended December 31, 2014, $1.3 trillion dollars was raised for Rule

506(b) and Rule 506(c) offerings; only a very small percentage of these offerings

were Rule 506(c) offerings; and

few issuers have taken advantage of Title I’s research reports provisions.

Title I - Emerging Growth Companies

Title I of the JOBS Act is viewed as the “IPO on ramp” or “IPO runway” for EGCs. An

EGC is an issuer with total annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion dollars during its most

recently completed fiscal year. An issuer’s EGC status terminates on the earliest of (i) the last

day of the first fiscal year during which the issuer had annual gross revenues of $1 billion or

more; (ii) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of

the issuer’s IPO; (iii) the date on which the issuer has issued more than $1 billion in convertible

debt during the prior three-year period determined on a rolling basis; or (iv) the date on which

the issuer is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act.

EGCs have the following advantages:

They may submit to the SEC a draft IPO registration for

confidential review; filings must be submitted to the SEC no

later than 21 days before the EGC conducts its road show;

They may submit only two (2) years of audited financial

statements instead of three (3) years for most registrants;

7 16631.001/9999/3000

EGCs may test the waters by having oral and/or written

communications with QIBs and institutional AIs to determine

interest in the offering;

Auditor attestation and internal controls compliance

requirements are phased in over five (5) years instead of present

compliance;

EGCs may choose to comply with non-EGC accounting

standards but may not selectively comply with these standards;

EGCs may comply with executive compensation disclosure

requirements for smaller reporting companies; and

EGCs are exempt from the requirement to hold non-binding

advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation (“say on

pay”) for one to three (3) years after the issuer is no longer an

EGC.

Title I has been very successful in promoting the growth of the IPO market and

many filers are taking advantage of the confidential filing provision. Recently, The Wall

Street Journal reported (“Secret IPO Filings Feed Deal Frenzy”, July 28, 2015) that one

of the unintended effects of EGCs filing their IPO registration statements confidentially is

sparking interest in the filers from prospective acquirers. Under Title I the EGC is able to

announce publicly that it has filed its registration statement (the SEC is forbidden from

disclosing that a confidential EGC filing has been made). Recent “stealth” EGC filers,

such as Planet Fitness Inc. and Houlihan Lokey Inc., have publicly disclosed the fact that

they made confidential SEC filings. Some companies may make an EGC confidential

filing to invite bids from prospective acquirers.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the SEC received EGC confidential filings

from around 850 companies in the past three years through June 30, 2015. But according

to Dealogic, a prominent research firm, only 479 of those filings lead to a consummated

8 16631.001/9999/3000

IPO.2 According to this article, confidentiality around IPOs “will make it more

challenging for the IPO market to recover from its slow start this year. Information is the

grease of the capital markets…You would think that we would want more transparency,

not less.” Nonetheless, these companies have taken advantage of the ability to “test the

waters” with AIs and QIBs for the offering and have a behind the scenes dialogue with

the SEC.

Title II - Rule 506(c) Regulation D Upgrade - General Solicitations and General

Advertising Permitted In Certain Private Placement Offerings

Section 4(b) of the Securities Act provides that offers and sales of securities

exempt under Rule 506 of Regulation D (as revised by Title II of the JOBS Act) shall not

be deemed public offerings under the Federal securities laws as a result of general

advertising and general solicitation. Rule 506(c) is excluded from Rule 502(c) of

Regulation D, which bans general solicitations and general advertising as a general

condition to a Regulation D offering. Rule 506(c) exempts from the registration

requirements sales of securities to an unlimited number of AIs provided certain

requirements are met (discussed below). Also, the removal of the prohibition against

general solicitation and advertising applies to funds that rely on Sections 3(c)(1) and

3(c)(7) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) for

sales to U. S. persons. Also, funds with concurrent U.S. and non-U.S. offerings (under

Regulation S) would not be integrated (general advertising and general solicitations are

not deemed to be direct selling efforts under Regulation S).

The conditions to offerings that are generally advertised and solicited in reliance

on Rule 506(c) are:

2 “Secret IPO Filings Feed Deal Frenzy,” The Wall Street Journal (July 28, 2015), at B4.

9 16631.001/9999/3000

Issuer takes reasonable steps to verify that purchasers are AIs and/or

QIBs;

All purchasers are AIs/QIBs at the time of the sale of the securities; and

Conditions of Rules 501, 502(a), and 502(d) of Regulation D are satisfied.

The issuer may satisfy the AI “reasonable steps” to verification process in several

suggested, but not mandatory, ways, including the following:

Fact based determination (for example, public company documentation);

IRS tax returns;

Bank or brokerage statements; and

Written confirmation from registered broker-dealer, investment adviser,

attorney, or CPA.

The SEC has stressed that exclusive reliance on potential investor responses in a fund

application or subscription document would not be adequate verification.

The issuer must also determine that no “bad actors” are involved in the private

placement’s base of covered persons (e.g., issuer, affiliated issuer, officer, director,

beneficial owners of 20% or more of issuer’s voting equity securities, promoters, etc.). If

any of these covered persons is subject to a “disqualifying event” (e.g., criminal

convictions, court injunctions and restraining orders, final orders of state and federal

regulators, SEC/FINRA disciplinary orders, etc.), an offering is disqualified from relying

on Rule 506(c). Note that if the issuer did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable

care, it could not have known that a covered person with a disqualifying event

participated in the offering, an issuer may rely on Rule 506(c).

10 16631.001/9999/3000

The Rule 506 amendments also impact broker-dealers, investment advisers, and

investment companies and their associated persons. SEC disciplinary orders relating to

these entities or persons are “disqualifying events” under the bad actor rule. In addition,

FINRA rules governing Rule 506(c) offering-related communications are complex.

FINRA Rule 5123 (FINRA member selling private placement securities to non-members

must file private placement documents with FINRA within 15 days of their first sale of

securities in Private Placement Filing Systems in FINRA Firm Gateway) and FINRA

Rule 2210 (pre-approved, filing, record keeping and communications with customers and

advertising) do not synch well with Rule 506(c) offerings deploying general solicitation

and general advertising. Broker-dealers participating in private placements under Rule

506(c) must comply with FINRA rules requiring all member communications to be based

upon principles of good faith and fair dealing and prohibiting broker-dealers from making

false, exaggerated and unwarranted or misleading statements or claims in any

communications. In a world where general solicitation rules are relaxed and Internet

offerings can be quickly constructed, broker dealers and their counsel will have to be

extra vigilant about ensuring adequate disclosure.

Commodity Pool Operators (“CPOs”) and Commodity Trading Advisors

(“CTAs”) have been reluctant to use Rule 506(c) in connection with private

placements/commodities fund offerings. Certain CFTC rules don’t gel well with Rule

506(c). CFTC Regulation 4.7 provides that CPOs and CTAs whose participants and

advisees are limited to qualified eligible persons (“QEPs”) may claim relief from

providing participants with a disclosure document; general solicitation is not permitted.

Under CFTC Regulation 4.7, offerings must qualify for registration exemptions pursuant

11 16631.001/9999/3000

to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Rule 506(c) is not an exemption pursuant to

Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

The CFTC addressed in its words this “discrepancy between marketing

restrictions in current Commission regulations and Regulation D and Rule 144A, as

amended pursuant to the JOBS Act” by granting exemptive relief. This relief was

granted by the CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealers and Intermediary Oversight. For Rule

506(c) offerings in which the CPO needs reporting relief from Regulation 4.7, relief was

granted from the provision that the offering must be exempt pursuant to Section 4(a)(2)

of the Securities Act and that interests be granted solely to QEPs. For Rule 506(c)

offerings in which the offering entity seeks to claim the de minimus registration

exemption of Regulation 4.13(a)(3), relief was granted from the requirement that offers

and sales be conducted without marketing to the public. Note that this area is very

complex and requires close scrutiny of the conditions for exemptive relief.

Since the SEC issued its final rule eliminating the ban against general solicitation

and general advertising in private placements to AIs and QIBs in July 2013, the

marketplace reaction for deploying this private offering feature has been mixed. Many

private equity, hedge, venture capital and other investment funds cherish their

confidentiality and have not deployed general solicitation and general advertising

strategies. Most of the Regulation D offerings are done pursuant to Rule 506(b).

On the other hand, relatively new matchmaking websites such as Circle Up and

Go Fund Me, which link AIs with private placement issuers, have increased and

flourished under Rule 506(c). As a result of the relaxation of the general advertising and

solicitation prohibition in Rule 506(c) private placements, these sites are able to introduce

12 16631.001/9999/3000

prospective AIs to companies seeking private placement investors/capital. Such sites

must limit their activities in order that they are not broker-dealers requiring registration.

Also, these sites will presumably set up portals for crowdfunding offerings to non-AIs.

Under the JOBS Act, a matchmaking site is exempt from registering as a broker-

dealer in Rule 506 offerings if it does not receive compensation such as a brokerage

commissions for the purchase or sale of private placement securities; it does not handle

customer funds or securities; and it is not a “bad actor.” Some matchmaking sites have

affiliated broker-dealers that receive a commission upon the sale of private placement

securities to AIs pursuant to the matchmaking site. According to SEC no action letters

and FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions), a matchmaking site may have a platform

permitting the offer, sale, purchase or negotiation of securities, or permit general

solicitation and advertising by issuers of securities, whether online, in person, or through

any other means. A matchmaking site may also provide ancillary services, such as due

diligence services and provision of standardized documents to issuers and investors.

These provisions apply only to the activities of matchmaking sites in Rule 506(c) private

placement offerings to AIs.

Title II - Regulation D Amendments

On September 27, 2013, the SEC proposed, and subsequently re-opened, a

comment period for discussion of the proposed rules and amendments relating to

Regulation D and Rule 156. These proposed rules would:

Require a Form D filing before the issuer engages in general solicitation

and to amend its Form D regarding inclusion of additional information in

a Form D regarding the offering;

13 16631.001/9999/3000

Require a Form D closing amendment to be filed with the SEC after the

termination of any Rule 506 offering;

Require written general solicitation materials in Rule 506(c) offerings to

have legends and other disclosures;

Extend Rule 156’s anti-fraud provisions to sales literature of private

funds;

Require filing with the SEC of written general solicitation materials in

Rule 506(c) offerings; and

Disqualify issuers for one year for future offerings if the issuer did not

comply within the last five years with Form D requirements.

These regulations have not been enacted and it is possible that some might be adopted

and others will not.

Title III - Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the JOBS Act largely because

a significant number of people are unaware that crowdfunding includes equity and debt offerings

in addition to donor and reward-based crowdfunding. This is due to the fact that the SEC’s

crowdfunding rules took over two years to finalize and the success during that time of non-equity

crowdfunding as a means to raise money for artistic projects, a charity or other causes capturing

the interest or sympathy of the multitude of “crowd funders.” In these instances, the “crowd” has

no expectation of receiving anything of value for the investment. However, crowdfunding, as

used in Title III the JOBS Act, concerns securities funding for commercial ventures through

small investors.

14 16631.001/9999/3000

The SEC issued final crowdfunding regulations on October 30, 2015. They are effective

at the end of May 2016. The market exhaled for a brief moment replaced by wonder as to

whether equity and debt raises by crowdfunding will be successful after this capital raising starts

in June 2016. By way of background, Title III of the JOBS Act was designed to exempt

crowdfunding securities offerings from registration under the Securities Act. The JOBS Act

added Section 4(a)(6) to the Securities Act, which section provides an exemption from the

registration requirement in Section 5 of the Securities Act for certain crowdfunding transactions.

In order to qualify for the exemption under Section 4(a)(6), an issuer and investors in a

crowdfunding transaction must meet specified requirements, including the following:

The amount raised must not exceed $1 million in a 12-month period (amount to be

adjusted every five years); this amount is the gross, not net, amount that may be

raised;

Individual investments in a 12-month period are limited to:

o The greater of $2,000 or 5 percent of the lesser of annual income or net

worth, if either the annual income or net worth of the investor is less than

$100,000;

o 10 percent of the lesser of annual income or net worth (not to exceed

$100,000 in all crowdfunding transactions in a 12-month period), if both

annual income and net worth of the investor are $100,000 or more; and

o Issuers must conduct transactions through an intermediary that is either a

registered broker/dealer or a funding portal. Issuers cannot use multiple

intermediaries for an offering or concurrent offerings in reliance on the

exemption. The Commission is of the view that policing compliance of

15 16631.001/9999/3000

the offering would be more effective if one intermediary oversees the

offering.

Issuers and “funding portals”, intermediaries that facilitate transactions between

issuers and investors in reliance on Section 4(a)(6), must provide certain information

to investors and potential investors, take certain other actions and provide notices and

other information to the SEC. The issuer must not have a disqualifying event

pursuant to the bad actor provisions of the Jobs Act.

Requirements as to Issuers

Below are detailed requirements to utilize the Section 4(a)(6) exemption:

A. Statutory Disclosures. Issuers must file certain statutory disclosures with the

Commission, provide these disclosures to investors and the relevant broker or funding portal, and

make these disclosures available to potential investors. The disclosures include: (1) the name,

legal status, physical address and website of the issuer; (2) names of the directors and officers

(and any person occupying similar status or performing a similar function), and each person

holding more than 20 percent of the shares of the issuer; (3) a description of the business of the

issuer and the anticipated business plan of the issuer; (4) a description of the financial condition

of the issuer; (5) a description of the stated purpose and intended use of proceeds of the offering

sought by the issuer with respect to the target offering amount; (6) the target offering amount and

regular updates regarding the progress of the issuer in meeting the target offering amount; (7)

the price of the securities or the method to determine the price; and (8) a description of the

ownership and capital structure of the issuer.

The crowdfunding rules establish a framework of tiered financial disclosure based on the

aggregate target offering amounts of the offering and all other offerings made in reliance on

16 16631.001/9999/3000

Section 4(a)(6) within the preceding 12-months. Issuers must file with the Commission, provide

to investors and the relevant intermediary, and make available to potential investors, the

following materials:

For issuers offering $100,000 or less, total income, taxable income and total tax as

reflected in the issuer’s federal income tax returns certified by its principal

executive officer (no requirement that issuer provide copies of entire tax return);

or if issuer has financial statements reviewed or audited by an independent public

accountant, these financial statements should be provided to investors;

For issuers offering more than $100,000, but not more than $500,000, financial

statements reviewed by a public accountant independent of the issuer; if audited

financial statements are available, issuer must provide these to investors;

For issuers offering more than $500,000 but not more than $1,000,000 for the first

time, financial statements reviewed by an independent accountant; if audited

financial statements are available, issuer must provide these to investors;

Issuers that have previously sold securities under the crowdfunding rules must

provide audited financial statements; and

Financial statements must be prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

These requirements could be burdensome, but the Commission takes the position that the

rule pertains to the type of information that an issuer would be generally required to disclose, and

to alleviate some of the burden, the issuer and the intermediary have discretion to determine the

format that best conveys the required information and any other information the issuer

determines is material to investors.

17 16631.001/9999/3000

B. Additional Disclosures Proposed by the SEC. In addition to the statutory disclosures,

the proposed rules require disclosure of (1) the name, Commission file number and Central

Registration Depository number (“CRD Number”) of the funding portal or intermediary through

which the offering is being conducted; (2) the amount of compensation paid to the intermediary

for conducting the offering, including the amount of any referral or other fees associated with the

offering; (3) certain legends to be included in the offering statement; (4) the number of current

employees of the issuer; (5) the material factors that make an investment in the issuer speculative

or risky; (6) the material indebtedness of the issuer, including the amount, interest rate, maturity

date, and any other material terms; (7) exempt offerings conducted within the past three years;

and (8) related party transactions. While seemingly burdensome for a small offering, these

detailed disclosures are intended to enable investors to make an informed investment decision

and help regulators to monitor compliance with the exemption. Crowdfunding takes a very

different approach for offerings of less than $1,000,000 as compared to Rule 504 of Regulation

D (which covers offerings up to $1,000,000 in a twelve month period in which issuers may

generally not use general advertising and solicitation), and is limited to private placement

offerings. Crowdfunding hopefully will create the infrastructure and data for an Internet enabled

micro-market for the securities of early stage companies.

C. Method for Disclosures. The crowdfunding rules set forth a disclosure regime as

follows: (1) issuers must use Form C for the initial required disclosures known as the offering

statement; (2) amendments to Form C must be filed on Form C-A to report material changes; (3)

progress reports/updates must be made on Form C-U; (4) annual reports must be done on Form

C-AR; and (5) termination of reporting obligations must be made on Form C-TR. Form C-AR

must be filed within 120 days of the end of the issuer’s fiscal year. The annual report should

18 16631.001/9999/3000

update information on Form C. An issuer also must update its information by reporting

amendments and progress updates to the offering statement on Form C. These reporting

obligations continue until the issuer becomes a reporting company, all securities are sold in

crowdfunded offerings are redeemed or repurchased by a third party, or the issuer liquidates or

dissolves.

D. Ineligible Issuers. The JOBS Act excludes certain issuers from participating in

crowdfunding, including the following: (1) foreign issuers; (2) issuers that are reporting

companies under the Exchange Act; (3) investment companies as defined under the Investment

Company Act or companies excluded from the definition of investment companies under Section

3(b) or 3(c) of that Act; (4) issuers that have taken advantage of Section 4(a)(6), but have failed

to file with the Commission or provide to investors on-going annual reports to the Commission

during the two years preceding a current offering; (5) issuers subject to disqualification under

crowdfunding disqualification rules; (6) issuers, typically known as blank check issuers, that are

early stage development stage companies without a business plan or corporate purpose, or

development companies that have indicated that they intend to merge or acquire an unaffiliated

company or companies; and (7) companies that have not complied with the crowdfunding rules

during the two years preceding the filing of an offering statement.

E. Integration with Other Exempt Offerings. Offerings made pursuant to the Section

4(a)(6) exemption will not be integrated with another exempt offering that precedes the

crowdfunding offering, or that takes place concurrently or subsequently with such offering. The

issuer must ensure that it has satisfied all of the conditions for the exemption that it is claiming

for each such offering. If the issuer is conducting a Rule 506(c) offering (using general

19 16631.001/9999/3000

solicitation), it must ensure that the crowdfunded offering it is making or made complied with all

crowdfunding rules (such as the restrictions on advertising).

F. Advertising and Promotion. Because crowdfunding occurs online, there is a sense

that the offerings are broadly advertised. However, the proposed rules would only allow limited

advertising consisting of specific notices advertising the terms of the offering to include only the

following: (1) a statement that the issuer is conducting an offering, the name of the intermediary

through which the offering is being conducted, and a link directing the potential investor to the

intermediary’s platform; (2) the terms of the offering; and (3) factual information about the legal

identity and business location of the issuer that is limited to the name of the issuer of the

security, the address, phone number and website of the issuer, the e-mail address of a

representative of the issuer and a brief description of the business of the issuer.

G. Restrictions on Resale. Securities purchased in a crowdfunded transaction cannot be

resold for a period of one year after the date of purchase, except when transferred (1) to the

issuer of the securities; (2) to an accredited investor in compliance with the federal securities

laws; (3) as part of a registered offering; or (4) to a family member of the purchaser or the

equivalent, or in connection with certain events, including death or divorce of the purchaser, or

other similar circumstances, subject to the discretion of the Commission. The one year

restriction applies to any purchaser, not just the initial purchaser. A person reselling securities to

an AI must have a reasonable belief that the prospective purchaser is an AI.

H. Exemption from Rule 12(g). The proposed rules exempt from the registration

requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, either conditionally or unconditionally,

securities acquired pursuant to an offering made in reliance on Section 4(a)(6). In other words,

Section 4(a)(6) securities would be exempt from and not count toward the “holder of record”

20 16631.001/9999/3000

count for purposes of determining if registration of a class of equity securities is required under

Section 12(g). Logistically, securities may be difficult to track by a new issuer and retaining a

transfer agent may be necessary.

Requirements on Funding Portals as Intermediaries

The crowdfunding rules impose significant gate keeping responsibilities on brokers

and/or funding portals. These responsibilities appear onerous and raise questions around how

crowdfunding intermediaries would be incentivized to serve in such capacity. Below is a brief

and summary discussion of the requirements.

A. Broker and Funding Portals. Section 4(a)(6) requires a crowdfunding offering to be

conducted through a broker or a funding portal that complies with the requirements of Section

4A(a) of the Securities Act. A “funding portal”, as defined by Section 304 of the JOBS Act, is

“any person acting as an intermediary in a transaction involving the offer or sale of securities for

the account of others, solely pursuant to Section 4(a)(6).” Funding portals will not be subject to

broker-dealer registration under Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1), but would be subject to an

alternative regulatory scheme largely managed by FINRA with oversight by the Commission.

But unlike matchmaking sites in Rule 506(c) offerings, funding portals may receive

compensation.

B. Impermissible Actions. Funding portals cannot: (1) offer investment advice or

recommendations; (2) solicit purchases, sales or offers to buy the securities offered or displayed

on its platform or portal; (3) compensate employees, agents or other persons for such solicitation

or based on the sale of securities displayed or referenced on its platform or portal; (4) hold,

manage, possess or otherwise handle investor funds or securities; or (5) engage in such other

prohibited activities that the Commission may determine by rulemaking.

21 16631.001/9999/3000

C. Required Disclosures by Intermediaries. Funding portals must provide specified

disclosures to investors and take the following steps:

Not later than 21 days prior to the first day on which securities are sold, make

available to the Commission and potential investors the information the issuer

is required to provide to investors;

Provide investor education materials and ensure that each investor reviews

such information and affirms his/her understanding of the risks associated

with the investment;

Take measures to reduce the risk of fraud, including background checks on

issuers’ officers, directors and holders of 20 percent of their outstanding

equity;

Only provide offering proceeds to the issuer when the aggregate capital raised

from all investors equals or exceeds the target offering amount, and allowing

for cancellation of the commitments to purchase in the offering;

Make efforts to ensure that no investor in a 12-month period exceeds the limit

allowed to be invested in all issuers that have conducted exempt

crowdfunding offerings;

Take steps to protect privacy of information;

Not compensate promoters, finders, or lead generators for providing personal

identifying information of personal investors;

Prohibit insiders from having any financial interest in an issuer using that

intermediary’s services; and

Meet any other requirements that the SEC may prescribe.

22 16631.001/9999/3000

D. FINRA Rules. On October 22, 2015, FINRA submitted to the SEC its proposed rules

regarding funding portals for crowdfunded securities offerings. FINRA’s approach is to

treat funding portals as a separate category of FINRA member distinct from broker-

dealers. FINRA eliminated the fidelity bond requirement and anti-money laundering

(“AML”) rule. In brief, FINRA proposed rules include:

Rule 100. Funding portals and their associated person would be subject to

FINRA’s bylaws.

Rule 110. The Rule outlines the membership application process and

establishes five standards for membership: (1) compliance with FINRA’s and

the Commission’s rules and regulations; (2) binding contractual arrangements

sufficient to initiate operations; (3) strong supervisory systems; (4) evidence

of direct and indirect funding sources (it is not clear if FINRA would place

specific financial requirements on the portal); and (5) record keeping systems.

Rule 200. Portal must observe high standards of commercial honor and just

and equitable principles of trade. Rule 200 also implicates the Commission’s

anti-fraud provisions related to effecting transactions in, or inducing the

purchase of sale of, any security by means of, or by aiding or abetting, any

manipulative or fraudulent device.

Rule 300. Portals must establish written policies and procedures and

supervisory systems designed to achieve compliance with all applicable rules

and report misconduct to FINRA as appropriate.

23 16631.001/9999/3000

Rule 800. Provide information to FINRA regarding the outcome of

investigation and sanctions related to the funding portal and associated

persons.

Rule 900. This rule establishes a code of procedure for funding portals.

Rule 1200. This rule contains arbitration and mediation procedures for

disputes.

Liability Scheme

Under the proposed crowdfunding rules, like other aspects of the JOBS Act, traditional

liability theories remain applicable, including that issuers, including their directors and officers,

are liable to purchasers of securities for untrue or materially misleading statements in offering

documents. Because an issuer is a person that offers or sells securities in crowdfunding

offerings, the SEC stated that “it appears likely that the intermediaries…would be considered

issuers for purposes of [the] liability provisions.”3 With respect to funding portals,

intermediaries must use reasonable care in reviewing offering documents, including establishing

a reasonable policy to avoid misstatements and untruths. Personal liability could attach to

directors, officers and employees of funding portals for such actions as fraud.

Assessing the crowdfunding rules and Title III of the Jobs Act, one thing that sets the

crowdfunding rules apart is the ability of small companies to create a community of small

investors and to give them marketplaces where they can support start-ups. The goals are novel in

that the SEC is attempting to facilitate investments in opportunities that have long been viewed

as the most speculative and difficult. Given the SEC’s overall mandate to protect investors,

getting crowdfunding “right” requires balancing complex and sometimes contradictory

3 SEC Release No. 33-9470 (October 23, 2013), at 280.

24 16631.001/9999/3000

objectives, including balancing the small size of the investment versus the significant

administrative framework to facilitate such investments.

Title IV - Regulation A+ Offerings

On March 25, 2015, the SEC adopted rules known as Regulation A+ that would increase

a smaller company’s ability to raise capital. The new rules revise Regulation A of the Securities

Act. Regulation A is an exemption from the full registration requirements of the Securities Act.

The old Regulation A permitted registered public offerings of up to $5 million of securities in

any twelve month period, including no more than $1.5 million in sales by security holders.

Under Regulation A+ rules companies meeting certain size requirements may offer and

sell up to $50 million of securities in a twelve month period, subject to disclosure and reporting

requirements. The rules provide for two tiers of securities offerings: (a) Tier 1 for offerings of

up to $20 million in a twelve month period, in which selling security holders that are affiliates of

the issuer cannot sell more than $6 million of securities, and (b) Tier 2 for offerings of up to $50

million in a twelve month period, in which selling security holders that are affiliates of the issuer

cannot sell more than $15 million of securities.

Tier 1 offerings are subject to federal and state registration and qualification

requirements; issuers may use the coordinated review program developed by the North American

Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”). The rules pre-empt state securities law

registration and qualification for securities offered or sold to “qualified purchasers” in Tier 2

offerings. The rules also limit sales by all security holders to no more than 30% of the issuer’s

initial Regulation A+ offering and subsequent Regulation A+ offerings for the twelve months

after the initial offering.

25 16631.001/9999/3000

Both offering Tiers are subject to company eligibility, disclosure and other matters, and

allow issuers to submit their draft offering statements for non-public (confidential) review by the

SEC staff before filing (similar to rules applicable to EGCs selling their securities in an initial

public offering or IPO), permit the use of solicitation materials after the issuer files the offering

statement, and require the electronic filing of offering materials. Also, issuers in both Tiers may

test the waters of the offering with all investors. In such cases, solicitation materials must be filed

with the SEC.

Tier 2 offerings also include the following requirements: (a) providing audited financial

statements to investors; (b) requiring issuers to file annual, semi-annual and current event

reports; and (c) restricting the amount of securities non-accredited investors may purchase to not

more than 10% of the greater of the investor’s net worth or annual income.

Regulation A+ is limited to companies organized in and with their principal place of

business in the United States or Canada. Also, Regulation A+ cannot be used by: (a) SEC

reporting companies and certain investment companies; (b) companies with no specific business

plan or companies that will engage in a mergers and acquisition transaction with an unidentified

entity; (c) companies offering asset-backed securities or oil, gas or other mineral rights; (d)

companies which have been subject to an SEC order under Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act,

(e) companies which have not filed required reports with the SEC for two years; and (f)

companies disqualified by the SEC’s “bad actor” rules.

If the issuer in a Tier 2 offering meets the following requirements, it will be exempt from

the mandatory registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: (a) the issuer uses

a transfer agent registered with the SEC; (b) the issuer is subject to Tier 2 reporting; (c) the issuer

26 16631.001/9999/3000

is current in its annual and semi-annual reporting at fiscal year end; and (d) the issuer has a

public float of less than $75 million at the end of its most recent semi-annual period, or in the

absence of such float, had annual revenues of less than $50 million as of its last fiscal year. If

the company exceeds the dollar amount and Section 12(g) registration thresholds, it would have

a two year period before it would have to register its securities.

It should be noted that in May 2015 Massachusetts and Montana sued the SEC alleging

that Regulation A+ improperly preempted state regulation of Tier 2 offerings, and that the SEC’s

authority to preempt state securities laws under the JOBS Act is limited to securities offered and

sold to “qualified purchasers.” The dispute stems in part over how the SEC defines “qualified

purchaser.” NASAA and certain present and former members of Congress filed briefs in support

of the States.

Titles V and VI. Exchange Act Registration Thresholds

Titles V and VI of the JOBS Act amended Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Section

12(g) as amended requires registration of a class of equity securities if, at the end of its fiscal

year, a company has at least $10 million in assets and a class of equity securities held of record

by either 2,000 persons, or 500 persons who are not AIs. Banks and bank holding companies do

not have to register unless they have, at the end of the fiscal year, at least $10 million in assets

and a class of equity securities held of record by 2,000 persons. A non-bank company may

deregister its securities if it has 300 holders of record or less. Banks and bank holding

companies may deregister if they have 1,200 or fewer holders of record. Exchange Act Section

12(g)(5) was amended to provide that “held of record” does not include securities held by

27 16631.001/9999/3000

persons who received the securities pursuant to an employee compensation plan in transactions

exempted under Section 5 of the Securities Act.

Closing Commentary

In the three plus years since it became law, the JOBS Act has in fact “jump started”

capital raising in meaningful ways. It has offered a real alternative to traditional registration and

private placements for “small businesses”, including EGCs, which seek to raise funds from

investors whether through the IPO on-ramp provisions of Title I, the limited public offerings of

Regulation D through Rule 506(c) of Title II, crowdfunding under Title III, and the Regulation

A+ provisions of Title IV. Although the success of equity and debt crowdfunding is too early to

call, hopefully this will significantly help small companies raise capital.

This article has been prepared by Bryant Rabbino LLP as an informational guide for clients and friends..

The information contained in this article should not be construed as legal advice. Should further analysis

or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact one of the attorneys below. The invitation

to contact is not a solicitation for legal work under the laws of any jurisdiction in which Bryant Rabbino

attorneys are not authorized to practice.

© Copyright 2015. Bryant Rabbino LLP. All Rights Reserved.

B. Seth Bryant Denver Edwards Thomas More Griffin

212-967-1800, x102 212-967-1800, x129 212-967-1800, x136

seth@bryantrabbino.com denveredwards@bryantrabbino.com tgriffin@bryantrabbino.com