SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT

MIDTERM CONFERENCE

Sept 12 Session 2

• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary

Sept 12 Session 2

• Management words

• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary

Sept 12 Session 2

• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future

• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary

Sept 12 Session 2

• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety

• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary

ENHANCED EFFICIENCY AND REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

EMPOWERED BY PORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (PORTCDM)

Mikael LindRISE Viktoria

PortCDM activities – At a glance

Example of integrated service- RTA from PortCDM to ECDIS

SHIPS AND PORTS NEED TO BE CONNECTED!

Connected ships Connected ports(destination)

Port call synch-

ronization

Voyage optimization Port call optimization

Enabling connectivity to hinterland for

sustainable transport systems

Connected ports(origin)

Port call optimization

Port call synch-

ronization

Enabling connectivity to hinterland for

sustainable transport systems

Port-to-port collaboration (optimization and synchronization)

Business incentives for PortCDMSavings for a large shipping line

(40 000 port calls per year) is between 65 MUSD and 130 MUSD for just-in-time

arrival

Assumption: The largest container vessel consumes 240 tons of fuel at full speed (23

knots) and 40 tons of fuel at 10 knots.

A reduction of 17 % of TTT can take away one vessel (if not fully loaded) in a route of 5 legs, 5 ships, using 4

ports

STRONG INCENTIVES FOR ENHANCED INTERACTION BETWEEN SHIPS AND

PORTS

Very many times ships do not leave in time giving rise to additional port call costs, chasing of time window to next

port, and delay for arriving vessels

OBJECTIVES OF PortCDM

Ports of destination

Port operator

Port operator

Port operator

Just-in-time operations

Optimal resource utilization

Green Steaming

Fast turn-around

Minimal waiting times

High degree of predictability

Ports of origin

Port operator

Port operator

Port operator

High degree of predictability

Precision in time of departure

Minimal chasing

Optimal resource utilization

No unexpected

waiting times

STM supports dynamic acting• Dynamic voyage optimization supported by services of

– Port call synchronization– Weather routing– Area management– Traffic Synchronization

• Dynamic port call optimization supported by services of– Port call synchronization– Traffic synchronization– Port flow optimization– Weather forecasting

PortCDM information service systemShipping ERP

TOS

Port Community Systems (PCS)

PMS

VTMIS

NSW

Service provider’s

systemFOC

Ship ECDIS

Hinterland operator’s

systemAISPrevious /

next port

Inter-operable platform for sharingtime stamps

International PortCDM councilThe Internationalition of PortCDM

BIMCOBMVI GermanyBSA Bahamas

CIRMCyprus Shipping Chamber

IALAICS

IHMAIHOIMOIMPA

IMSOIntertanko

Marshall Island RegistryMember state AustraliaMember state Canada

Member state SingaporeMOF Korea

Port of FreemantlePort of Singapore

SMAValencia port foundation

Confirmed / TBC members

… and more to come

• Port call message format (PCMF)

• PortCDM concept definition

• Generic guidelines for the PortCDMconcept

• Port call structure ontology

• Criteria for accreditation of PortCDMapplication and data services

• Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

International governing body for generic PortCDM matters maintaining:

Ensuring STM and PortCDM implementation meetsthe needs of the international maritime community

Analysis of reasons for being delayedfrom berth

* Arrival OK (Not presented in this sheet)

Departure: * Definite Pilotage changed from 00:30 to 02:00 at 23:48 Thislate change resulted in a penalty fee of 2490SEK.

* Cause of delay: Bunker Operations and Sludge Operations were delayed. (SludgeOp requested (00:05) for 00:30 and wasfinished 01:10).

* Bunker and Sludge took place after Cargo Operations Completed.

* DepartureOK (Not presented in this sheet)

Arrival: * Vessel was at anchor waiting for available berth (511).

* No ETA from MSW-SMA after 2017-05-02 10:47 because RAMONA was scheduled for berth 511 after SMERALDO (see sheet 8), and the agent told the pilotage administration to coordinate (to keep the preliminary pilotage order updated in line with SMERALDOsdeparture).

* Pilotage (definite) ordered for 22:30 (SMERALDO 23:00) thenchanged to 23:30 (SMERALDO 00:00) and then changed to 23:59 (SMERALDO 00:30). These changes resulted in a penalty fee of1490SEK for RAMONA.

* SMERALDO was then further delayed (late change) to 02:00 butthe pilot was already on its way to RAMONA and started the pilotageat 23:59 as ordered. Because of the delay pilotage was billed for 3,5 hours instead of 2 hours which is an extra fee of: 7046SEK

* Cause of delay = berth availability . (SMERALDO was delayed, seesheet 8).

* Arrival OK (Not presented in this sheet)

Departure:* Definite Pilotage changed from 10:00 to 13:00 at 09:24 This late change resulted in a penalty fee of 2490SEK.

* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed + ready to sailoperations (paperwork) delayed.

* Interesting is that MSW-SMA got updated 07:06 to ETD 12:00, this did not change the Pilotage order. (Pilotage Definite was at 07:06 ordered for 10:00).

* With a front-end this would have been visible for all the actorsand action could have been taken already at 07:06 when therewas an indication that there could be a delay.

* Arrival OK. (Not presented in this sheet)

Departue:* Pilotage Commenced = 14:35 (35 minutes delayed). Pilotage usually takeapproximately 1 hour for this type of vessel for departure. But because of the delaypilotage was billed for 1,5 hours instead of 1 hour which is an extra fee of: 3049SEK.

* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed.

* No digital information between 10:07 and 14:00 were found. Somewhere in between the delay occurred.

* Arrival OK. No delays (actually the other way around, the vessel arrived earlier than estimated. )

Departure: * Definite Pilotage changed from 16:00 to 17.30 at 13:52. This late change resulted in a penalty fee of1490SEK. (Not a significant amount, but another vessel suffered from this delay, please see the SONGA RUBY sheet)

* Cargo Operations was completed and the delay was due to that the paper work and testing of the cargo was delayed. (Ready-to-sail operations were delayed).

* Interesting is that PortitSEGOT had at the time of the definite pilotage order ETD estimated to 17:00 and not to 16:00. Why? (Could not find an answer to that.) Ideally ETD and Pilotage Confirmed shouldbe the same.

* Departure OK. No delays (interesting is that PortitSEGOT had latest ETD 13:00 but ATD was 14:38, Pilotage was ordered for 14:30). Why?

Arrival:* Vessel was at anchor waiting for available berth (511).

* Pilotage ordered for 15:30. The departing vessel Bonito was scheduledto depart 16:00 but was delayed (see Bonito sheet) to 17:30. Pilotagewas accordingly changed to 17:00 for Songa Ruby which resulted in a penalty fee of 1990SEK.

* Cause of delay = berth availability . (BONITO was delayed, see separatesheet).

* The pilot was idle for 1,5 hours in vain, waiting at pilot station to board at 17:00 instead of 15:30.

* Arrival OK no delays. But interesting is that ETA wasreported 05:00 but ATA berth was ~06:00. (Pilotage wasordered for 05:00 and was not delayed). ETA? What does thatmean in MSW-SMA/PortitSEGOT?

Departure:* ETD 07:00 and Pilotage ordered for 07:00. ATA was 07:37.

* Pilotage usually take approximately 1 hour for this type ofvessel for departure. But because of the delay pilotage wasbilled for 1,5 hours instead of 1 hour which is an extra fee of: 2610SEK.

* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed. When the pilotage arrived to the vessel approximatly 5-10 lifts remained.

Latest ETD = 05:00 from MSW-SMA & 05:30 from PortitSEGOT. Reported ATD 06:25. Concequences of thisdelay:* Pilotage fee based on time, payed for 1 hr extra pilotage time (Extra Pilotage cost approximately 4697 SEK)* Another vessel with 2 pilots and 2 tugboats inbound for that berth. Pilotage time 04:00-07:20 = 1hr extra pilotage and tugboat-time. (Extra Pilotage cost approximately 8701SEK, this excludes the extra hour oftugboat assistance)* Safety - in this example the inbound vessel had to execute a "turn-around manouver" (See picture) closeto Trubaduren Lighthouse (at the same time: TTAM (Trubaduren Traffic Area Management) is an initiative toincrease the safety in those highly trafficked waters.)* Environment - 1 hour of extra emissions in the archipelago of Gothenburg

* At 02:11 PortitSEGOT changed ETD to 05:30 = indication that there was information that suggested that it could be delays? Why did not the Pilotage Request change accordingly? If so information could be sent toinbound vessel to be at Pilot Boarding Station later. (Pilotage Requested 04:00 which is normal when ETD is 05:00 for the departing vessel).

* Cause of delay :When the pilot came onboard the vessel was not ready to sail, approximately 30 "lifts" remained = 1-1,5h delay. Due to lack of information terminal<--->agent/GotApp.==> Cargo Operations Delayed.

Dependencies betweentime stamps

Cost drivers

THINK DIFFERENT

MAKE THINGS HAPPEN

MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Mikael LindRISE Viktoria

Mikael.Lind@ri.se

For questions do not hesitate to contact:

EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENTGAINS FROM BETTER INFORMATION SHARING AND

STANDARDIZED INFORMATION SERVICES

BJÖRN ANDREASSON, SMA

Service provider

Ports

Fleet operations

Ice breaking services

Shore Centre/VTS

SAR

Shoresideservices

MSW

STMRoute catalogue

services

What is itSTM is an integration project

What kind of benefits

• More effective work onboardand ashore better services

• Generalisability new services

• More information, accurate and up do date, available better services

AchievementsThe cogwheel metaphor

How to describe and specify it?

Is the specification enough?

Achieved!

SeaSWIM

Information services

Applicationservices, e.g. route optimization

STM shipsystem e.g. ECDIS

Goals in this project

From goals to validated effects!

Next steps in project

STM next steps

• Maintenance and refinementof arcitecture

• Services that provides costsavings

• Regional pilot implementations

STM FOR EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENT

José Andrés Giménez

STM for Efficiency & Environment

Source: The Guardian

STM for Efficiency & Environment

• Maritime transport emits around 1,000 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions (3rdIMO GHG study).

• Shipping emissions are predicted to increase between 50% and 250% by 2050 – depending on future economic and energy developments.

STM for Efficiency & Environment

STM Goals

STM DRIVER FOR TRANSFORMATION

SHIP – TO – PORT

- Enabling just-in-time operations

- Improving portefficiency

- Reducing turn-around times

SHIP – TO –SHIP/SHORE

- Optimising routenavigation

- Reducing navigationtimes

- Reducing fuel consumption

Efficiency (€)

Emissions (CO2)

STM for Efficiency & Environment

6

13

125

128

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

No. of Vessels per type of service

OTHER SERVICES

CRUISE SERVICES

REGULAR SERVICES

TRAMP

STM for Efficiency & Environment

STM Test Bed Selected Ships

No. Of ships per type of Service (Total 275 ships)

STM for Efficiency & Environment

STM Monitoring Routes

CONTAINERSHIP06California Express service

Frequency: Weekly10 ships operating the service

Deep-sea serviceVALENCIA – CRISTOBAL – MANZANILLO – LONG BEACH – OAKLAND – VANCOUVER – SEATTLE –OAKLAND – LONG BEACH – MANZANILLO – BALBOA – CRISTOBAL - - BARCELONA – GIOIA TAURO –CIVITAVECCHIA – LA SPEZIA – FOS - VALENCIA

STM for Efficiency & Environment

PortCDMTest Beds

VoyageManagement

Test Beds

ValidatedResults

Macro Analysis

13 EU Ports

300 Ships5 Shore Centers

Use cases:Regular ServicesTramp ServicesCruise ServicesBerth-to-berth VESSL© DataBase

+1,000 Maritime Services+200 EU Ports+2,500 Ships

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION

STM Expected Benefits

Benefits for Shipping Companies (M€)Nautical Miles SavedFuel Consumption SavedOptmised NavigationWaiting Time SavedSafety Increase

Benefits for EU Ports (M€)Just-in-Time OperationsImproved Predictabilityand PlanningResource OptimisationSafety Increase

Benefits for allReduced GHG EmissionsImproved Air QualityImproved Social PerceptionEfficient and SustainableMaritime Transport

PORT OPTIMIZATION, LOGISTICS, CRUISE

TROND ANDERSEN, PORT OF STAVANGER

What is PortCDM - cruise

Goals in PortCDM cruise

• Punctuality

• Predictability

• Berth productivity

Achievements

Better understanding of situations.Time-related informationreaches actors.Better cooperation and understanding of roles.

Next steps in project

• Port-to-port/Ship-to-port collaboration

• All ships, not just cruise• More connectors

Vision

Sept 12 Session 2

• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment

• Day 1 summary

Demos

• Italian STM solutions• PortCDM applications• Transas STM ship & shore centre solutions• Carmenta SAR solution for Rescue Centres• Analysis tools