Upload
gabriella-fletcher
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SCYCLE
OPERATING UNIT
POM, WEEE Generated & Flows in various EU Countries
Tallinn, October 1, 2015
Jaco Huisman – Huisman [at] unu.edu
Key projects/ activities: Best-of-2-Worlds (CN, 2004-2012) Policy review on EU WEEE Directive (EU, 2007) E-waste Academies (Global) Global E-waste Monitor (2014) CWIT (Countering WEEE Illegal Trade, EU 2013-2015) Common methodology new EU collection targets (EU, 2015) ProSUM (Prospecting Secondary Raw Materials, 2015-2017) Hosting StEP Secretariat: Solving the e-waste problem, see:
www.step-initiative.org
United Nations UniversitySCYCLE Team
The world of electronics
> 650 product type
6 waste streams
Different products, unique approach 4
To calculate WEEE Generated:Note:
Life span distribution = the probability of a product batch becoming waste over time Lifespan models when the consumer
decide to dispose the product, even in the case of preparation for reuse
Lifespan created trough Consumer surveys in some MS (can be refined in the future)
WEEE Generated = the amount of discarded products (waste) due to national consumption from a national territory (POM) in a given reporting year prior any activity (collection, preparation for reuse, treatment or export).
Lifespan examples (year of sale is 2012)
2012 2013 2015 2016 2018 2019 2021 2022 2024 2025 2027 2028 2030 2031 2033 2034 2036 20370%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%102 Dish-Washers
104 Washers
108&110 Fridges
111 Air Cond.
114 Microwaves
201 SHA
205 SHA Body Care
303 Laptop
307 LCD Monitor
401 Small CE
DIFFERENT ProductsDIFFERENT Markets
DIFFERENT Generation
Global E-waste Monitor 2014
See http://step-initiative. org/index.php/WorldMap.html for
the Global E-waste Monitor Data Summary Report
9E-waste generation worldwide
E-waste generated in 2014 (pro-capita)
>21 kg/inh
7 to 14 kg/inh
< 7 kg/inh
14 to 21 kg/inh
Europe: 15.6 kg/inh
Oceania: 15.2 kg/inh
Africa: 1.7 kg/inh+11% annually!
Asia: 3.7 kg/inh+10% annually!
Americas: 12.2 kg/inh
Domestic E-waste Generated 2014 (total)
The Socio-economic impact 12
EU country studies Identified Critical Factors for target setting and monitoring progress Methodology Consolidated in 5+ years of country studies: Basis for DG-ENV Art.7 Study Basis for 1st Global E-waste Monitor 2014
13
POM, Stock, WG and all Compl. Flows 2nd consumer + business surveyincl. collection% per UNU key (B2B+B2C)
POM, Stock, WGBusiness surveyall B2B+B2C UNU-keys
POM, Stock, WG, Compl. Flows Recyclers market surveyall B2C + selected B2B UNU-keys
POM, Stock and WEEEConsumer surveyall B2C UNU-keys
POM, WG Evaluating national POM + WG model selected B2C UNU-keys
@work
@work
@work
This is the Urban Mine (Data Belgium 2011)How much do you have at home?
Total: > 79 EEE products + 47 Lamps/Luminaires per HH (B2C) // + 36 EEE per HH outside home (B2B) Total Stock = 263 kg/inh.
Attic:1.0 Central Heating/ boiler0.03 Sunbeds2 Other Lamps1 Energy saving lamp2 TL lamps3 Luminaires
Work/ hobby room6.0 Mice, keyboards, external drives, etc.0.8 Desktops 0.8 Laptops/tablets 1.1 Printers 1.4 Phone sets3.5 Mobile phones 0.4 CRT Monitors0.7 LCD Monitors 1.1 Cameras2 Other lamps 1 Energy saving lamps3 Luminaires 0.2 Exercise equipment
`Bed room Kids room0.9 CRT TVs 2 Other lamps2 Other lamps 1 Energy saving lamp1 Energy saving lamps 3 Luminaires3 Luminaires 5.2 Electr. Toys1 Smoke alarm 0.5 Game Consoles
0.7 Smoke alarms
Bath room5.9 Shavers, elec. toothbrushes hairfohns, etc.2 Other lamps1 Energy saving lamps3 Luminaires1.3 Thermometers/ bloodpressure meters
Living room 0.07 Aircons 5 Small households appliances: Clocks, adapters, chargers, etc.2.2 Remote Controls, headphones, etc.2.2 Radio’s/Mp3 4.0 Audio/HiFi compon. 1.9 DVD/ VCRs 2.3 Speaker sets 0.9 LCD TV’s 4 Other lamps2 Energy saving lamps 6 Luminaires
Kitchen0.6 Dishwashers 0.8 Ovens/furnaces1.1 Ventilators/ hoods 1.0 Magnetrons1.4 Fridges 0.1 Icemakers, etc. 6.8 Small kitchen appliances: Blenders, mixers, frying pans, cooking plates, grills, toasters, etc2.0 Coffee/ water cookers 2 Other lamps1 Energy saving lamp 3 Luminaires
Scullery Garden/garage1.0 Washing mach. 2.2 Other lamps0.6 Dryers 3.7 Energy sav. lamps0.6 Freezers 3.2 Luminaires3.9 Irons, scales, 6.6 Drills, lawn adapters, etc. mowers, saws, 1.6 Vac. cleaners hedges, high pressure2.8 TL lamps cleaners, etc.
http://isp.unu.edu/publications/scycle/files/Dutch_WEEE_Flows.pdf
2012 ‘The Future Flows’ Study2010 WEEE mass balance over The Netherlands
11%
32%
28%
19%
10%
http://isp.unu.edu/publications/scycle/files/Dutch_WEEE_Flows.pdf
E-scrap generation
23.7 kg/inh.
2012 ‘The Future Flows’ Study2010 WEEE mass balance over The Netherlands
17Country Studies: ITA, NLD, BEL, FRA
Data(all in kg/inh)
BEL2013
NLD2012/2014*
ITA2012
FRA2013
PRT2013
Note
EEE PoM 26,2 25,5* 21,6 (B2C) 23 (B2C) 15.3** ** PRT: year on year large fluctuations
Stock EEE 260 275* 220 (B2C) 245 (B2C) 225
WG 22,4 23,3* 16,3*** (B2C)
+/- 20 (B2C) 17.3 ***ITA: excl. lamps
Reported Formal 10,5 7,5 4,3 6,9 3.8**** ****2012
Complementary 2,7 6,6 > 6,9 > 3,1 unknown
Export EEE > 0,6 2,7 > 0,7 unknown unknown
Export WEEE > 0,3 < 0,8 > 0,7 > 1,8 unknown
MSW 1,5 2,3 1,6 – 2,3 2 1.5**** ****2012
Unidentified +/- 6,8 1,9 – 5,1 +/- 6,0 3 to 9 unknown ITA, PRT no downstream investigation
Formal(s) alone currently does not suffice
Complementary streams play a crucial role
Joint efforts (stakeholders) are needed to:• Investigate and track downstream • Identify missing flows
Challenges under WEEE Recast 18
2012-2015
4 kg/ab or
Average 3 preceeding years
2016-2018
45% PoM (3 preceeding years)
From 2019
65% PoM (3 preceeding years) Or 85% WG
Including B2B
1. From 4 kg/ inh. % based target2. Primary responsibility to the Member States
Development Methodology & Tool
Task AMethodology
WEEE generated by weight
Task BMethodology
EEE POM by weight
Impact analysis & target implementation
Task CAssess collection target for
individual collection categories
Task DAnalyze implementing
difficulties, deadlines and collection rate basis
Data, information and model outcome
“How to meet the upcoming collection target?” 2011-2014: WEEE Directive Art. 7, Common Methodology
20EU context & Member States role
Directive 2012/19/EU
National Transpositions
…..
WEEE Art. 7WEEE Art. 11
Exporting ConditionsWEEE Art. 16.3
EC S
tudi
es Life-span
TARGET Implementation
Com
plia
nce
Sche
mes
Oth
er
Econ
omic
O
pera
tors
Was
te B
in
Re-U
se L
oops
Expo
rt fo
r Re
Use
, Tr
eatm
ent
Waste Generated (Tool + current estim.)
A
Data Quality
TARGET SettingC
D
Reporting Framework
ACH
IEVE
MEN
T
Put on Market B Data Quality
Data Quality
Member State Responsibility
Study Context
EC Activities
EU WEEE flows, 2012
85%
22Tools and experiences from country studiesUNU can assist in:
Set-up national research consortia
‘Harmonized’ E-waste classification
Templates for (consumer) surveys
Provide national WEEE Generated Model + training and visualisation aid
POM data from national stat./ Eurostat
Ad-hoc tools also for share individual compliance schemes in national totals
International benchmark POM, WEEE, Collected & Treated
Evaluating WEEE complementary flows
Advice on collection interventions
Conclusions Irrespective the target mechanism (POM or WG), it’s crucial to understand
where flows are ending up Proper tracking and accountability of flows is key for target achievement On-the-ground research is needed to map flows Better informed decision making :
Country support: UNU Country studies:
http://isp.unu.edu/publications/scycle/index.html
Global e-scrap data:
http://step-initiative.org/index.php/WorldMap.html
http://ias.unu.edu/en/research/e-waste-quantification.html#outputs
Capacity Building: StEP E-waste Academies:For academia:
http://step-initiative.org/index.php/ewas.htmlFor policy makers, managers:
http://step-initiative.org/index.php/ewam.html
Policy advice: Countering WEEE Illegal Trade:
www.cwit-project.eu
What UNU can offer:
Individual data requests: [email protected]
Ecolum Proposal
25
Extra slides
26
Ecolum Proposal
Starting Point: Official Reported Performances (2012, Eurostat data)
26
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cypru
s*
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
France*
German
y
Greece*
Hungary
Irelan
dIta
lyLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Luxe
mbourg
Netherl
ands*
Poland
Portuga
l
Romania*
Slova
kia
Slove
nia
Spain
*
Swed
en
United Kingd
om0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Waste Collected * 2010 Data
4kg
27
Ecolum Proposal
WEEE Ending up in Waste Bin (from CWIT preliminary results)
27
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cypru
s*
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
France*
German
y
Greece*
Hungary
Irelan
dIta
lyLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Luxe
mbourg
Netherl
ands*
Poland
Portuga
l
Romania*
Slova
kia
Slove
nia
Spain
*
Swed
en
United Kingd
om0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Waste Collected Waste Bin_Estimates
More investigation needed to identify flows and “divert” them
from waste bin
4kg
28
Ecolum Proposal
WEEE Collected by other operators(Estimates)
28
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cypru
s*
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
France*
German
y
Greece*
Hungary
Irelan
dIta
lyLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Luxe
mbourg
Netherl
ands*
Poland
Portuga
l
Romania*
Slova
kia
Slove
nia
Spain
*
Swed
en
United Kingd
om0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Waste Collected Waste Bin_Estimates Other Operators
Are those players reporting?How are those flows labeled (EWC)
?
4kg
29
Ecolum Proposal
Gap to Future Targets (?): POM or WG based
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cypru
s*
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
France*
German
y
Greece*
Hungary
Irelan
dIta
lyLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Luxe
mbourg
Netherl
ands*
Poland
Portuga
l
Romania*
Slova
kia
Slove
nia
Spain
*
Swed
en
United Kingd
om0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Waste Collected Waste Bin_Estimates Other Operators GAP to POM or WG Future Target
WEEE Generated in MS is certainly “more” than the amount actually officially collected and reported
Certain gaps are easier to fill, other are not..!!Targets will have to be defined (WG or POM based)Actions are needed to comply with future targets
4kg