Scottrade, Inc. v. Modern Energy Corporation Et Al Doc 63 Filed 25 Jan 10

4626693

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

EASTERN DIVISION

Scottrade, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 4:07-cv-01982 HEA

)

Modern Energy Corporation; )

First Public Securities Transfer )

Corporation; )

)

Defendants; )

)

Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & )

Smith, Inc.; Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing )

Solutions, Inc.; Penson Financial Services, Inc., )

E*Trade Financial Corporation; TD Ameritrade, )

Clearing Services, Inc.; )

)

Relief Defendants. )

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF

I. Introduction

In 2007, Defendant, Modern Energy Corporation (“Modern Energy”) purported to effect

a “mandatory exchange” – actually a reverse stock split -- to reduce its issued and outstanding

common shares from 1.2 billion to 1.2 million. The transaction was part of a fraudulent scheme

designed to confuse holders of Modern Energy’s stock and induce them to take actions which

would, in turn, create an artificial market for Modern Energy’s otherwise valueless common

shares. On paper, the “mandatory exchange” was completed in October, 2007, before this action

was commenced.

When the Court reviewed the transaction and the means by which it had been announced

and effected, the Court concluded that the “mandatory exchange” had been effected without

Case: 4:07-cv-01982-HEA Doc. #: 63 Filed: 01/25/10 Page: 1 of 27 PageID #: 475

4626693 - 2 -

compliance with applicable provisions of Wyoming law (where Modern Energy is incorporated)

and in violation of certain anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, specifically

Section 10(b) of that statute, 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and Rule 10b-17 promulgated pursuant thereto,

17 C.F.R. §240.10b-17. This Court declared the reverse stock split null and void (Docket Entry

# 43, December 20, 2007) and subsequently permanently enjoined Modern Energy, its transfer

agent First Public Securities Transfer Corp. (“First Public”), and all persons acting in concert

with them from effecting transactions predicated upon the effectiveness of the reverse stock split

(Docket Entry # 55, February 7, 2008).

These final, unappealed Judgments of this Court should have put an end to the matter.

Unfortunately, Modern Energy and First Public refused to conduct themselves consistently with

the Court’s Judgments. While publicly proclaiming they were taking actions to implement the

Court’s Judgments, Modern Energy, First Public and persons acting in concert with them have

engaged in a series of actions calculated both to flout those Judgments and to further the

fraudulent scheme the Court’s Judgments were intended to halt. Modern Energy, First Public

and persons acting in concert with them are persisting in their attempt to manipulate the market

for Modern Energy common stock to the detriment of Plaintiff Scottrade, Inc.(“Scottrade”), and

thereby force Scottrade to pay extortionate and artificial prices for Modern Energy shares that

have no intrinsic value. While doing so, Modern Energy, First Public, and those acting in

concert with it have persisted in their refusal to comply with the reporting requirements imposed

by the Securities Exchange Act in a continuing effort to conceal the fact that Modern Energy is

and at all relevant times was a an empty corporate shell having no intrinsic value and no

legitimate business purpose.


4626693 - 3 -

Scottrade is filing this First Amended Complaint to secure additional declaratory and

injunctive relief calculated to finally put a halt to Defendants’ fraudulent scheme.

For its First Amended Complaint for permanent injunctive relief, along with a

declaratory judgment, Scottrade states:

II. Jurisdiction and Venue

1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this case pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, in

that the claims asserted herein arise under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, particularly

Sections 10 and 29 of that statute, 15 U.S.C. §§78j, 78cc. The Court also has jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1392, in that Scottrade is a citizen of Arizona and Missouri, and none of

the Defendants or the Relief Defendants are citizens of either of those states, and the amount in

controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds $75,000.

2. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa in that all Defendants may

be found, inhabit, or otherwise transact business in the Eastern District of Missouri. Venue is

also proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), in that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the

claim occurred in this District.

III. Parties

3. Scottrade is a corporation organized under the laws of Arizona and having its principal

place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Scottrade is a securities broker-dealer. It operates in

the discount retail brokerage market.

4. Defendant Modern Energy is a corporation organized under the laws of Wyoming. At

the outset of this action, Modern Energy claimed to have offices and its principal place of

business in California. Today, while Modern Energy remains incorporated in Wyoming,

persons purporting to act for Modern Energy have made filings with the Wyoming Secretary of


4626693 - 4 -

State indicating that Modern Energy’s office and place of business is now located on Mindanao

in the Philippine Islands. Modern Energy remains subject to the jurisdiction of this Court

because at the inception of this case it was causing its common shares to be traded in national

securities markets in the United States and it appeared and defended this matter in this Court.

5. Defendant First Public Securities Transfer Corporation (“First Public”) was, at the

inception of this action, a corporation organized under the laws of Oregon with its principal place

of business in a state other than Missouri or Arizona. Since this Court’s earlier judgments were

rendered against it, First Public has forfeited its corporate charter from the State of Oregon by

failing to file requisite reports with the Oregon Secretary of State. The filings made on behalf of

First Public with the Oregon Secretary of State’s office prior to the time when its corporate

charter was forfeited listed Sandy Winick as First Public’s president, and identified addresses in

Toronto, Canada (where Sandy Winick resides) and in Los Altos, California (where an

individual using the name David Korman is believed to reside).

6. Relief Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) is a

corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in

New York. Merrill Lynch is a registered broker-dealer in the State of Missouri and maintains

offices in this District. Merrill Lynch was a party to this case at its inception and is bound by the

Court’s prior judgments in this matter. No new claim for relief against Merrill Lynch is intended

to be asserted in this First Amended Complaint, and no relief beyond that already granted by the

Court in its prior judgments is requested as to Merrill Lynch.

7. Relief Defendant Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as

ADP Clearing & Outsourcing Services, Inc.) (“Ridge Clearing”) is a corporation organized under

the laws of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in a state other than Missouri or


4626693 - 5 -

Arizona. Ridge Clearing is a registered broker-dealer in the State of Missouri. Ridge Clearing

was a party to this case at its inception and is bound by the Court’s prior judgments in this

matter. No new claim for relief against Ridge Clearing is intended to be asserted in this First

Amended Complaint, and no relief beyond that already granted by the Court in its prior

judgments is requested as to Ridge Clearing.

8. Relief Defendant Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“Penson”) is a corporation organized

under the laws of North Carolina, and having its principal place of business in a state other than

Missouri or Arizona. Penson is a registered broker-dealer in the State of Missouri. Penson was a

party to this action at its outset and is bound by the Court’s prior judgments in this matter. No

new claim for relief against Penson is intended to be asserted in this First Amended Complaint,

and no relief beyond that already granted by the Court in its prior judgments is requested as to

Ridge Clearing.

9. Relief Defendant E*Trade Financial Corporation (“E*Trade”) is a corporation organized

under the laws of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in a state other than

Missouri or Arizona. E*Trade was a party to this action at its inception and is bound by the prior

Judgments of this Court in this action. No new claim for relief against E*Trade is intended to be

asserted in this First Amended Complaint, and no relief beyond that already granted by the Court

in its prior judgments is requested as to E*Trade.

10. Relief Defendant T. D. Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.(“Ameritrade”), is a corporation

organized under the laws of Nebraska, and having its principal place of business in Nebraska.

Ameritrade is now joined as a Relief Defendant in this matter because, subsequent to the entry of

this Court’s prior judgments, demand has been made upon Ameritrade that it “buy-in” against

Scottrade shares of Modern Energy common stock to settle transactions effected in 2007


4626693 - 6 -

subsequent to Modern Energy’s attempt to effect a reverse stock split and has advised Scottrade

that, absent an injunction binding upon it to refrain from doing so, it will “buy-in” shares of

Modern Energy for Scottrade’s account to settle trades in Modern Energy common which this

Court has determined to be null and void.

IV. Persons Acting In Concert With Modern Energy and First Public

11. Sandy Winick, as indicated above, is an individual whom the SEC has concluded

organized and spun off a series of corporate shells having no legitimate business purpose with

the intention of utilizing such corporate shells to perpetrate securities frauds. Modern Energy’s

predecessor, Riverbank is apparently one such company, and Modern Energy’s transfer agent,

First Public, is such a company. Sandy Winick has been named by the SEC as a defendant in a

civil action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and accused of

perpetrating securities frauds through such spun off entities.

12. David Korman (“Korman”), also known as: Mark Pedley, Branch Vinedresser, Dr.

David Korem, and perhaps other aliases, is an individual who has claimed at times to reside in

Los Altos, California and purported to hold proxies making him effectively the controlling

shareholder of Riverbank and Modern Energy. Korman was convicted of mail fraud in 1983 and

served three years in a federal penitentiary for such offense; subsequently, in 1986, he was

convicted of racketeering and sentenced to an eight year prison term. Korman was released from

parole in 1994, shortly before Riverbank was formed. In addition to claiming to hold proxies

for a controlling position in Modern Energy common shares, Korman has regularly and routinely

purported to act for, and direct the affairs of, First Public.

13. Michael S. Ioane (“Ioane”) is an individual residing in California. Ioane is associated

with a business operating under the name of Acacia Business Solutions (“Acacia”), which


4626693 - 7 -

describes Ioane as its “Legal Tutor”. Ioane’s has frequently filed unfounded pleadings and

lawsuits, prompting at least one U.S. District Court to enter an order prohibiting Ioane from

filing any additional papers in that Court without prior permission of the Court. Presently, Ioane

is under indictment in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for tax fraud.

Ioane purports to own 5 million Modern Energy shares, either personally or through an Oregon

corporation he purports to control called Western Investment Properties, Inc. (“Western”).

These shares are traceable to 500,000 shares of Riverbank stock Ioane purportedly received from

Korman for rendering business consulting services of an undisclosed nature to Riverbank and

Korman. Beginning not later than December 21, 2007, Ioane began directing the actions

purportedly taken by Modern Energy.

14. Teri Norgrove is an individual residing in Nevada. She is an employee of Acacia, and

one of Ioane’s subordinates at Acacia. In or after December, 2007, Norgrove, at Ioane’s

instance, publicly portrayed herself as Modern Energy’s president.

15. John Winnick, also known as John Frederick Winnick, Jack Chao, Chao Winnick and

Jack Winnick, and perhaps other aliases, is an individual formerly residing in California and

doing business there as a stock broker. John Winnick’s registration as an associated person of

any FINRA member firm has been indefinitely suspended as of June 29, 2009. Commencing in

or about 2009, and continuing until approximately December 21, 2009, John Winnick was

publicly identified as Modern Energy’s president and director.

16. Sultan M.U. Saud (“Saud”) is purportedly an individual residing on the island of

Mindanao in the Philippine Islands. Since December 21, 2009, Saud has been identified as the

President and Director of Modern Energy.


4626693 - 8 -

V. Facts Common To All Counts

17. Modern Energy is the corporate successor to a Delaware corporation called Riverbank

Investments, Inc. (“Riverbank”). Riverbank was apparently one of numerous corporate entities

created by or at the behest of an individual named Sandy Winick, which corporations, according

to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), had and have no

legitimate business purpose but were created as a means of perpetrating securities frauds on

unsuspecting members of the investing public.

18. First Public, like Riverbank, is one of numerous corporate entities the SEC has concluded

were created by or at the behest of Sandy Winick, which corporations had and have no

legitimate business purpose but were created as a means of perpetrating securities frauds on

unsuspecting members of the investing public.

19. The reverse stock split, described by Modern Energy as a “mandatory exchange” and

declared null and void by this Court in its Judgments previously entered in this case, was part of

one such securities fraud. As this Court recognized, that scheme was intended to operate by

concealing from holders of Modern Energy common shares that their holdings of such shares had

been reduced in volume by a factor of 1,000. The perpetrators of the scheme intended their fraud

to induce some such holders to enter orders to sell many times more Modern Energy common

shares than they (would have) held (had the purported reverse stock split been valid). The

perpetrators planned that sellers so induced would be forced to buy Modern Energy common

shares in the open market to “cover” the resultant “short” positions, or that the counterparties to

those transactions would “buy-in” the shares in the open market to “cover” the shares the sellers

failed to deliver in settlement of such transactions. When those “covering” purchases occurred,


4626693 - 9 -

the perpetrators planned to be the sellers of Modern Energy shares and to demand artificially

high prices for their shares, thus reaping profits from their fraud.

20. When Modern Energy, First Public and those persons acting in concert with them

launched the fraudulent scheme enjoined by this Court, 1.2 billion shares of Modern Energy

common stock were authorized, issued and outstanding. At that time, the “public float” of

Modern Energy’s common shares consisted of approximately 500 million shares evidenced by

stock certificates issued to CEDE & Company, a nominee of the Depository Trust Company

(“DTC”). Approximately 700 million Modern Energy shares were held or controlled by Modern

Energy insiders and were not part of the public float of Modern Energy shares. No sale or

distribution of Modern Energy shares had ever been registered with the SEC pursuant to the

Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §77a et seq.

21. DTC held those (approximately) 500 million Modern Energy common shares for the

accounts of its customers – principally, brokerage firms which, like Scottrade, held the shares for

the accounts of its their customers.

22. Of the approximately 500 million Modern Energy common shares evidenced by

certificates issued to CEDE & Company and held by DTC, 30,797,165 shares were held by DTC

for Scottrade’s account. Scottrade, in turn, held such shares for the accounts of its customers.

23. To effect the reverse stock split declared null and void in this Court’s Judgement entered

December 20, 2007, Modern Energy’s transfer agent, First Public, delivered certificates to CEDE

for approximately 500,000 Modern Energy common shares and received in exchange for those

certificates the certificates evidencing approximately 500 million Modern Energy common

shares referenced in paragraph 14, above.


4626693 - 10 -

24. Korman actively directed the actions of both Modern Energy and First Public in effecting

the purported “mandatory exchange”.

25. Essentially concurrently with this exchange, DTC made entries in its books and records

reducing the quantity of Modern Energy common shares shown by DTC’s records to be held by

DTC for Scottrade’s account from 30,797,165 to 30,797.

26. As previously alleged and found by this Court, Scottrade, not knowing of the purported

reverse stock split because Modern Energy had failed to give proper notice thereof, thereafter

entered an order to sell 1 million shares of Modern Energy common stock for the account of one

of Scottrade’s customers. The order was executed between October 23 and October 25, 2007

(the “Trades”).

27. When DTC and its sister corporation, National Securities Settlement Corporation

(“NSCC”) processed the Trades for clearing and settlement, they did so after DTC had made the

exchange with First Public described above and after DTC had made entries in its books and

records reducing Scottrade’s holdings of Modern Energy common shares from 30,797,165 to

30,797 shares.

28. The process of clearing and beginning the settlement of the Trades resulted in DTC

debiting Scottrade’s account for all 30,797 Modern Energy common shares reflected in DTC’s

books and records as being held for Scottrade’s account, and crediting those shares to the

accounts of Scottrade’s counterparties to the sales transactions in partial settlement of the Trades.

29. After this Court declared the reverse stock split to be null and void, held that Scottrade

has no liability with respect to the Trades, and permanently enjoined Modern Energy and its

transfer agent, First Public, as well as the Relief Defendants from taking the actions described in

the Permanent Injunction, Modern Energy and First Public should have cancelled the certificates


4626693 - 11 -

issued to CEDE & Company for approximately 500,000 Modern Energy shares in exchange for

the certificates representing approximately 500 million Modern Energy shares CEDE &

Company held prior to the purported reverse stock split and re-issued and delivered to CEDE &

Company certificates evidencing the approximately 500 million Modern Energy shares Modern

Energy intended to cancel in connection with the purported reverse stock split.

30. Upon receipt of those certificates, DTC, in turn, should have restored its customers’

accounts to the status quo ante, insofar as their holdings of Modern Energy common shares were

concerned. At a minimum, Scottrade’s DTC account should have then held approximately

29,797.165 Modern Energy common shares, (after accounting for the sale of 1 million Modern

Energy common shares pursuant to the Trades).

31. Modern Energy and First Public, however, took no such action.

32. Because Modern Energy and First Public did not cancel the certificates issued to CEDE

& Company and delivered to DTC to effect the purported reverse stock split, and did not re-issue

to CEDE & Company or deliver to DTC certificates evidencing the approximately 500 million

Modern Energy common shares purportedly exchanged (and cancelled) as part of the reverse

stock split, DTC did not restore to Scottrade’s account to the status quo ante respecting its

holdings of Modern Energy common shares.

33. Subsequent to this Court’s declaration that the reverse stock split was null and void,

Modern Energy, First Public and persons acting in concert with them have engaged in a series of

actions calculated to perpetrate a fraud on Scottrade and other holders of Modern Energy shares

by means dependent upon the initial reverse stock split but different from the means previously

enjoined by the Court..


4626693 - 12 -

34. On or before December 21, 2007, after being confronted during his December 14, 2007

deposition taken in this case with evidence of the fraud being perpetrated by individuals who had

been directing his actions as Modern Energy’s President and director, James R. Stewart, who

was then Modern Energy’s sole officer, director, and employee, resigned all of his positions with

Modern Energy.

35. Prior to resigning those offices and positions, Mr. Stewart did not appoint any successor

to himself (and any effort he might have made to appoint his own successor as a director of

Modern Energy would have been invalid in any event).

36. The only legitimate means by which a new board of directors for Modern Energy could

be established was to convene, upon proper notice, a meeting of Modern Energy’s shareholders

for the purpose of electing one or more directors.

37. At all relevant times, Modern Energy’s common shares have been held by in excess of

five hundred persons, and Modern Energy has claimed (albeit falsely) to have assets in excess of

$1 million. Consequently, pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

15 U.S.C. §78l, Modern Energy was and is obliged to register its shares with the SEC and file

with the SEC periodic reports on Forms 10-Q, 10-K and 8-K pursuant to Section 13 of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m.

38. Modern Energy has never registered its shares with the SEC, and has never filed any

reports or proxy statements with the SEC.

39. Modern Energy has not even issued any notices of shareholder meetings since at least

June 1, 2007.

40. Consequently, no person or persons could have been properly elected as directors of

Modern Energy following Mr. Stewart’s resignation as Modern Energy’s sole director on


4626693 - 13 -

December 21, 2007, and, without any legitimately elected directors, Modern Energy could not

have any properly appointed officers following Mr. Stewart’s resignation as Modern Energy’s

sole officer on December 21, 2007.

41. Without properly elected directors, and without properly appointed officers, there was no

person in a position to take any action on behalf of Modern Energy from and after December 21,

2007.

42. Nevertheless, subsequent to December 21, 2007, one or more persons acting in concert

with Modern Energy and First Public, including Korman and Ioane, assumed control of Modern

Energy’s website and such corporate records as Modern Energy had, and proceeded to

orchestrate a series of actions designed to create the false impression that Modern Energy is in

fact an active, operating corporation having assets and an actual business purpose.

43. Korman, upon receipt of notice from Stewart of his resignation, informed Stewart that

Ioane would be assuming control of Modern Energy, and that an employee of Ioane’s, Norgrove,

would be appointed President of Modern Energy.

44. After Ioane received Stewart’s resignation, Ioane communicated to Stewart

acknowledging receipt of the resignation and requesting Norgrove’s appointment as Modern

Energy’s President.

45. Sometime on or after December 21, 2007, a document was created purporting to show

that Mr. Stewart both resigned his positions as an officer and director of Modern Energy and

appointed an individual named Terri Norgrove as Modern Energy’s President.

46. Mr. Stewart was requested to transmit those records pertaining to Modern Energy that

were in his custody to Michael Ioane. Mr. Stewart was similarly requested to transfer control of

the telephone number maintained for Modern Energy to Michael Ioane, and he did so.


4626693 - 14 -

47. Thereafter, persons acting in concert with Modern Energy and First Public published on

Modern Energy’s website an announcement that Terri Norgrove was the new President of

Modern Energy.

48. Following the public announcement that Terri Norgrove was the new President of

Modern Energy, persons acting in concert with Modern Energy and First Public (a) announced

that it had completed a 1,000:1 forward stock split on April 30, 2008, and (b) caused certificates

purportedly representing approximately 499.5 million Modern Energy shares to be issued to

CEDE & Company and delivered to DTC.

49. Subsequent to these events, an announcement was posted on Modern Energy’s website to

the effect that Terri Norgrove had been succeeded as President of Modern Energy by an

individual named John Winnick.

50. No proxy statement was issued to Modern Energy’s shareholders to convene a meeting of

shareholders to vote on the election of directors of Modern Energy, and no such meeting was

held. Consequently, it was impossible for John Winnick to have been validly appointed as

Modern Energy’s president, there being no validly elected board of directors of Modern Energy

to appoint John Winnick or any other person to hold any office with Modern Energy.

51. Most recently, persons acting in concert with Modern Energy and First Public have filed

what purports to be an annual report for Modern Energy with the Wyoming Secretary of State,

reporting that as of December 21, 2009, Sultan M.U. Saud, residing on Mindanao in the

Philippine Islands is the Director and President of Modern Energy, and that the principal address

of Modern Energy is now located in Cagayan De Oro City, Mindanao in the Philippine Islands.

52. As with the purported appointments of Terri Norgrove and John Winnick, no

shareholders meeting was announced or convened to elect Sultan M.U. Saud as a director of


4626693 - 15 -

Modern Energy, no proxy statement was issued or filed with the SEC concerning such meeting,

and no properly constituted board of directors of Modern Energy exists or existed to appoint

Sultan M.U. Saud as President of Modern Energy.

53. At the time of the purported April 30, 2008 forward stock split, Modern Energy had no

properly elected directors who could authorize or approve such corporate action, no properly

appointed officers or hired employees who could implement such action, and had not held any

properly noticed shareholders meeting to authorize or take the actions necessary for Modern

Energy to engage in a forward split of Modern Energy’s shares.

54. Consequently, the purported forward split announced April 30, 2008 was null, void and

of no force and effect.

55. Moreover, at the time the forward split was purportedly authorized, Modern Energy

already had issued and outstanding 1.2 billion shares of common stock (because the purported

reverse stock split that Modern Energy was treating as reducing its issued and outstanding shares

to 1.2 million shares as of October 19, 2007 [and continuing until the date of the forward split]

was null and void, as declared by this Court in a judgment that, by April 30, 2008, had become

final and non-appealable).

56. Modern Energy’s articles of incorporation, as amended, only authorize Modern Energy to

issue 10 billion common shares.

57. Consequently, even if the 1,000:1 forward split Modern Energy announced on April 30,

2008 had been authorized by a duly elected board of directors of Modern Energy or by Modern

Energy’s shareholders acting at a duly noticed meeting, the reported forward split would have

violated Modern Energy’s corporate charter by causing Modern Energy to have 1.2 trillion

common shares issued and outstanding at a time when Modern Energy’s corporate charter only


4626693 - 16 -

authorized the issuance of 10 billion common shares. The purported forward split announce

April 30, 2008 was null and void for that reason, as well as the other reasons stated above.

58. According to the announcement of the forward split, the objective of the forward split

transaction was to comply with the Court’s earlier orders. That announcement was a false and

misleading statement made in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, and therefore

violative of 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated pursuant thereto.

59. Such a forward split was unnecessary to implement the Court’s declaration that the

reverse stock split was null and void, and it could not do so.

60. In reality, the forward split transaction was designed and intended by those persons acting

in concert with Modern Energy and First Public, including but not limited to Korman and Ioane,

and who drafted the press release announcing the purported forward split to further the

fraudulent scheme Modern Energy, First Public and those acting in concert with them devised

and launched when the (void) reverse stock split was announced in 2007.

61. Because Modern Energy and First Public did not act to re-establish the status quo ante

after this Court declared the reverse stock split null and void and enjoined actions designed to

capitalize on the intended effects of that (void) reverse stock split, DTC did not reverse the

accounting entries it had made to reflect that reverse stock split, including the entries which

reduced Scottrade’s holdings of Modern Energy common shares on DTC’s books from

30,797,165 shares to 30,797 shares.

62. Because DTC had further debited Scottrade’s DTC account for the 30,797 shares in that

account in partial settlement of the Trades, when Modern Energy purported to effect a forward

split of its shares on April 30, 2008 and delivered certificates to DTC purportedly evidencing


4626693 - 17 -

shares distributable to DTC pursuant to the forward stock split, DTC’s records indicated that it

held no Modern Energy common shares for Scottrade’s benefit.

63. Consequently, when allocating the Modern Energy shares purportedly distributed to DTC

in connection with the forward split announced April 30, 2008, DTC did not allocate any such

shares to Scottrade’s DTC account.

64. DTC’s handling of the Modern Energy shares purportedly represented by the certificates

issued to DTC’s nominee, CEDE & Company in connection with the forward split announce

April 30, 2008 was predictable and fully anticipated and expected by Modern Energy, First

Public, and those persons acting in concert with them to perpetrate a fraud upon Scottrade and

other participants in the securities markets, including DTC. Indeed, the persons acting in concert

with Modern Energy and First Public to orchestrate the purported forward split of Modern

Energy shares counted on DTC to handle the distribution of the (new) Modern Energy shares

purportedly evidenced by the certificates delivered to DTC in connection with the purported

forward split in the manner in which DTC handled such distribution.

65. Shortly after the forward split was announced, the persons acting in concert with Modern

Energy and First Public to perpetrate the fraudulent scheme launched with the announcement of

the purported reverse stock split engaged in a campaign to force Scottrade to deliver to the

customers for whose accounts Scottrade held the 29,797.165 Modern Energy common shares not

sold in the Trades certificates representing those shares or to pay damages to such customers for

not doing so.

66. An unknown number of the persons acting in concert with Modern Energy and First

Public to perpetrate the fraud on Scottrade are Scottrade customers who held Modern Energy

shares in their Scottrade accounts immediately before the reverse stock split was announced.


4626693 - 18 -

Among those persons are Michael Ioane and a corporation controlled by Michael Ioane, Western

Investment Properties, Inc. (“Western”).

67. In the cases of Ioane and the entity Ioane controls, Western, the efforts to force Scottrade

to enter the market to purchase otherwise valueless Modern Energy shares at extortionate and

artificial prices or pay damages measured by such extortionate and artificial prices include filing

arbitration proceedings seeking orders of specific performance and damages for past failures to

deliver certificates representing Modern Energy shares.

68. Additionally, despite this Court’s earlier permanent injunction against attempts to buy-in

at Scottrade’s expense Modern Energy shares to settle the Trades, persons acting in concert with

Modern Energy and First Public have taken actions designed to cause Relief Defendant TD

Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. to attempt to buy in 40,000 shares of Modern Energy at Scottrade’s

expense to settle portions of the Trades.

69. Because Modern Energy and First Public did not act to restore the status quo ante

following this Court’s declaration that the reverse stock split was null and void, and because

Modern Energy, First Public and persons acting in concert with them are continuing to attempt to

perpetrate the fraud set in motion by the purported, but void, reverse stock split, Scottrade is now

at risk of having to obtain Modern Energy common shares at extortionate or artificial prices in

order to satisfy its customers’ and other persons’ demands for delivery of otherwise valueless

Modern Energy shares, or pay damages to such customers for its failures to do so.

70. Modern Energy is an empty corporate shell, having no legitimate business and no

legitimate business purpose. It has no substantial assets or revenues. It has no properly elected

board of directors, properly appointed officers or properly hired employees. It continues to

violate the provisions of the federal securities laws which require corporations having in excess


4626693 - 19 -

of 500 shareholders and claiming to have in excess of $1 million in assets to register their shares

with the SEC and to file periodic financial reports with the SEC and to file (and furnish to

shareholders) proxy statements in connection with the election of directors and other matters.

71. Consequently, Scottrade cannot obtain effective monetary relief in the form of damages

from Modern Energy for the fraud perpetrated against Scottrade and which continues to be

perpetrated against Scottrade.

72. First Public is now a defunct corporate entity, having forfeited its corporate charter for

failing to file annual reports with the Oregon Secretary of State. It has and had no discernible

assets of any value.

73. Consequently, Scottrade cannot obtain effective monetary relief in the form of damages

from First Public for the fraud perpetrated against Scottrade and which continues to be

perpetrated against Scottrade.

COUNT I Request for Declaratory Relief

74. Scottrade incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 – 73 as though the

same were fully set forth herein.

75. There is a genuine controversy between Scottrade, Modern Energy, First Public and the

persons acting in concert with Modern Energy and First Public over:

(a) whether Modern Energy and First Public have complied with or violated the spirit and

the letter of this Court’s prior judgments in this matter, and in particular whether Modern Energy

and First Public have violated the letter and spirit of the Court’s judgments by (a) not cancelling

the certificates for Modern Energy shares issued in connection with the reverse stock split

declared void by this Court, and (b) not reissuing to Modern Energy’s shareholders who


4626693 - 20 -

exchanged certificates for Modern Energy shares outstanding immediately before the purported,

but void, reverse stock split certificates representing the exchanged shares;

(b) whether Scottrade should now hold, through its account with DTC, 29,797,165

shares of Modern Energy common stock from the shares held by Scottrade through its account

with DTC immediately preceding the supposed effective date of the purported, but void, reverse

stock split;

(c) whether Modern Energy has violated and continues to violate the reporting

requirements imposed on it by the federal securities laws, specifically 15 U.S.C. §§78l and 78m;

(d) whether Modern Energy now has or at any time since December 21, 2007 has had a

properly constituted board of directors, properly appointed officers or employees, and has taken

any action since December 21, 2007 which was a properly authorized action;

(e) whether Modern Energy has any assets or legitimate business purpose and,

consequently, whether its shares have any value, or if its purported existence as a corporate

entity is being continued solely to further the fraud launched with the announcement of the

purported, but void, reverse stock split.

76. In fact:

(a) Modern Energy and First Public have not complied with and have violated the spirit

and the letter of this Court’s prior judgments in this matter;

(b) Based on this Court’s prior judgments rendered in this matter, Scottrade’s DTC

account should now reflect that it continues to own 29,797,165 of the 30,797,165 Modern

Energy common shares Scottrade held through its DTC account for the accounts of

Scottrade customers on October 19, 2007;


4626693 - 21 -

(c) Modern Energy has violated and continues to violate the reporting requirements

imposed on it by the federal securities laws, specifically 15 U.S.C. §§78l and 78m;

(d) Modern Energy does not now have, and since December 21, 2007 has not had a

properly constituted board of directors, properly appointed officers or employees, and no

action purportedly taken by Modern Energy at any time since December 21, 2007 was a

properly authorized action by Modern Energy, every such action having been taken by

persons acting in Modern Energy’s name but without any authority to so act;

(e) Modern Energy has no assets or legitimate business purpose, its shares are valueless,

and its purported existence as a corporate entity is being continued solely to further the

fraud launched with the announcement of the purported, but void, reverse stock split.

WHEREFORE, Scottrade prays that this Court enter its declaratory judgment that:

(a) Modern Energy and First Public have not complied with and have violated the spirit

and the letter of this Court’s prior judgments in this matter;

(b) Based on this Court’s prior judgments rendered in this matter, Scottrade’s DTC

account should now reflect that it continues to own 29,797,165 of the 30,797,165 Modern

Energy common shares Scottrade held through its DTC account for the accounts of

Scottrade customers on October 19, 2007;

(c) Modern Energy has violated and continues to violate the reporting requirements

imposed on it by the federal securities laws, specifically 15 U.S.C. §§78l and 78m;

(d) Modern Energy does not now have, and since December 21, 2007 has not had a

properly constituted board of directors, properly appointed officers or employees, and no

action purportedly taken by Modern Energy at any time since December 21, 2007 was a

properly authorized action by Modern Energy, every such action having been taken by


4626693 - 22 -

persons (including Korman and Ioane) acting in Modern Energy’s name but without any

authority to so act;

(e) Modern Energy has no substantial assets or legitimate business purpose, its shares are

valueless, and its purported existence as a corporate entity is being continued solely to

further the fraud launched with the announcement of the purported, but void, reverse

stock split.

And affording Scottrade such other and further relief to which it may be entitled under the

circumstances.

COUNT II Request for Permanent Injunctive Relief

77. Scottrade hereby incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 – 76 as if fully set forth herein.

78. Unless Defendants Modern Energy, First Public and all persons acting in concert with

them, and Relief Defendant TD Ameritrade Clearing Corporation are permanently enjoined as

described below, Scottrade will be irreparably harmed.

79. Scottrade has no adequate remedy at law.

80. The harm resulting from the imposition of the requested injunctive relief is minimal

compared to the irreparable harm suffered by Scottrade if Defendants are permitted to perpetuate

their fraudulent scheme and/or the buy-ins are executed.

81. The public interest is served by the imposition of the requested injunctive relief.

WHEREFORE, Scottrade respectfully requests that in accordance with Rule 65(d), Fed.

R. Civ. P., the Court enter judgment in the form of a Permanent Injunction against Defendants

Modern Energy, First Public, and all persons in active concert or participation with them,

including but not limited to Ioane and Korman, and against Relief Defendant T.D. Ameritrade

Clearing, Inc., awarding the following relief:


4626693 - 23 -

a. As to Relief Defendant T.D. Ameritrade Clearing, Inc., a permanent injunction

enjoining Relief Defendant T.D. Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. in substantially the manner and from

substantially the same types of activities as this Court enjoined the other Relief Defendants in the

Permanent Injunction previously entered by this Court on February 7, 2007;

b. As to Defendants Modern Energy and First Public, and all persons acting or

purporting to act as a transfer agent for Modern Energy shares, and all persons who are in active

concert or participation with any of them, including Korman and Ioane, a permanent injunction:

1. Prohibiting Modern Energy, its transfer agents including, but not limited to First Public, and

all persons who are in active concert or participation with them, including, but not limited to

Korman and Ioane, from issuing any additional securities purporting to be issued by Modern

Energy without the express, prior approval of this Court;



Korman and Ioane, from transferring or purporting to transfer, of record, ownership of any

securities heretofore issued or purportedly issued by Modern Energy without the express, prior

approval of this Court;



Korman and Ioane, from issuing any further announcements, press releases, or other form of

communication with actual or purported shareholders of Modern Energy or the investing public

and purporting to be from or concerning Modern Energy without the prior express approval of

this Court;


4626693 - 24 -

4. Requiring that Modern Energy, its transfer agents including, but not limited to First Public,

and all persons who are in active concert or participation with them, including, but not limited to

Korman and Ioane, shut down the website currently operated at

www.modernenergycorporation.com, and prohibiting such persons from creating, operating, or

maintaining any website or posting any content to any website purporting to be a website of

Modern Energy Corporation;



Korman and Ioane, from making any further filings with the Wyoming Secretary of State’s

office in the name of Modern Energy Corporation without the prior express approval of this

Court;



Korman and Ioane, from taking any actions directly or indirectly intended to perpetuate the

manipulative scheme described above, including, but not limited to, taking any actions which

would directly or indirectly cause, force, or result in Scottrade having to purchase or pay for any

shares of Modern Energy;

And affording Scottrade such other and further relief as to which it may be entitled under the

circumstances.


4626693 - 25 -

Respectfully submitted,

THOMPSON COBURN LLP

By: /s/ Thomas E. Douglass

Thomas E. Douglass, #3008

Kenton E. Knickmeyer, #3577

One US Bank Plaza

St. Louis, Missouri 63101

314-552-6000

FAX 314-552-7000

Attorneys for Plaintiff Scottrade, Inc.


4626693 - 26 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing has been filed with the court via electronic court filing

and served on the parties accordingly. Service via first class mail postage prepaid, on January

25, 2010, to Modern Energy and First Public Securities.

Joseph F. Devereux, Jr.

Vicki Little

Devereux and Murphy

190 Carondelet Plaza, 11th

Floor

St. Louis, MO 63105

(314) 721-1516

(314) 721-4434 (fax)

[email protected]

Attorneys for E*Trade Financial Corporation

Adam Behar

Mark Digidio

(212) 747-7184

(516) 472-5008

[email protected]

[email protected]

Attorneys for Defendant Ridge Clearing

Tim Davis

Penson Financial Services, Inc

1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 1400

Dallas, TX 75201

(214) 765-1568

(214) 217-1682 (fax)

[email protected]

Attorneys for Defendant Penson

Edwin L. Noel

F. Scott Galt

Armstrong Teasdale LLP

One Metropolitan Square, Suite 2600

St. Louis, MO 63102-2740

(314) 621-5070

(314) 621-5065 (fax)

[email protected]

[email protected]

Attorneys for Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.


mailto:[email protected]



4626693 - 27 -

Modern Energy Corporation

Registered Agent

Corporation Service Company

1821 Logan Avenue

Cheyenne, WY 82001

R. Burns, Registered Agent

First Public Securities Transfer Corporation

6 Coronado Shores

Lincoln City, OR 97367

/s/Thomas Douglass


Documents

Scottrade, Inc. v. Modern Energy Corporation Et Al Doc 63 Filed 25 Jan 10