8/10/2019 "Scientific" Germany: cheating DFG and the
Ombudsmans-charlatans
2/4
ct. 1, 2014
Re: I-PRO-29.05.07 [complaint]
Dear Dr. Httemann,
he procedure for the treatment of scientific misconduct by DFG
appears
completely subjective, without any relation to the highest
standards of
integrity, accuracy and fairness.
First of all, the said "publicly presented concepts" were known
to the DFG auditorium
only, which is confirmed by absence of any citation in further
publications. That is why I
can not be sure in the degree of similarity between the
mentioned old presentation and
the plagiarized paper. oreo!er, if e!en this is true, my method
was presented in ept.
#$$$, as a submission titled 'An SFET Based Transducer of Nerve
Impulses (The Living
Being-Machine Inerface Scheme as an Inelligen S!sem's Term"' to
Shaping the
Futue! po"ect o# $%PO 2000 &'((O)$R%enclosed please find an
evident PDF&.
Secondly, it does not clear, how my arguments could "ha!en't
been specific enough" if I
have answered your question completely and any your further
enquiries were not
submitted during more than a year?(e!ertheless, I am still agree
to satisfy your
re)uirements in the necessary details.
A key transducing element which was defined in the poster as !F"
had
been presented in #$$$ $%"&' (orld )ongress and described in
the
relevant publication*
'A cryogenic induction magnetometer', Proceedings of XIII IMEKO
World Congress
(International Measurement Confederation), e!tem"er #$%,
&%%, orino, Italy, !!
*+$*+-*
*ours sincerely,
+ostyslav !&-A+, Dr. "ng/
Mr. Rostyslav SKLYAR, Verchratskogo st. 15-1, Lviv 79010
krai!e
+38 032 2762432
E [email protected] www.tsp.lviv.ua/~sklyar/sklyar
8/10/2019 "Scientific" Germany: cheating DFG and the
Ombudsmans-charlatans
4/4
Prof. em. Dr. Hanns Georg Kilian
Abteilung Experimentelle Physik
Ombudsmann
An Professor Dr. Karl Joachim Ebeling
(Prsident der Universitt Ulm)
D-89069 Ulm,
12
Jul.
201
3
Albert-Einstein Allee
Tel. 0731 502 6072
Fax. 0731 502 3036
ma
il
: [email protected]
Betreff: Von R Sklyar eine ungerechtfertigt scharf formulierte
Beschuldigung einer
Urheber-Verletzung.von Herrn Jun. Prof. Dr. Steffen Strehle.
Sehr geehrter Prsident,
lieber Herr Ebeling,
Da Herr
R
Sklyar unstatthaft universitts-ffentlich Herrn Jun. Prof.
Dr.-lng. Steffen
Strehle (Institut fr Elektronische Bauelemente und Schaltungen)
schriftlich schwerwiegendes
wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten vorwirft, finden wir es
m
besten, jeden der Empfnger ber
das Ergebnis unserer grndlichen Untersuchung zu
unterrichten.
Die pflichtgeme berprfung durch mich als Ombudsmann in Absprache
mit Herrn Strehle
liefert den sicheren Nachweis, dass die Anschuldigung von
Herrn
R
Sklyar nicht haltbar ist
(siehe Einzelheiten im Anhang). Herrn Jun. Prof. Dr.-lng.
Steffen Strehle wird daher von mir
als Ombudsmann der Universitt Ulm unwiderruflich bescheinigt,
dass der Vorwurf des
schwerwiegenden wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens nicht
zutrifft.
Mit besten Gren.
Ihr
