Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dear Reader,
the SCI Do it! -project „Support of the Refugees at Lorch“ has triggered diverse reactions and reflections by the participating students. For a better overview I sampled a few of them and grouped into different issues such as:
Freedom / War-Experiences / Friends/Women / Populism
Freedom _ Charlotte describes a moment while playing a language game, where she got a glimpse of what it must mean for a person to grow up in a war or under an authoritarian regime and leave everything behind to start a new life.
War-Experiences_ students reflect upon the war in Syria and the Middle East and what it has done to the people. Inan shares the experience of his friend fighting the IS in Kobane. Aymeric discusses how the refugees perceive the engagement of Europeans who fight against the IS. Henri and Marius describe their feelings while listening to stories of people who had lost their beloved ones in the war.
Friends_Frederic tells about his friendship with Mohammed and Hani. Pierre shares his memories of ”Picasso”, who has become a friend of the whole group and Mehran writes about the progress of his friend who has been here since a year.
Women_Some essays reflect the situation of female refugees. Cecile is concerned with the situation of the women in Lorch and Victorien and also Larrissa propose to become more engaged in that area. Thomas and Maksim are concerned with the discrimination of muslim girls in sportsclubs.
Politics_Matin has delivered an excellent essay on the legal situation of refugees from Afghanistan
Populism_Francois counters every single argument against migration with sound economic arguments! This is a must read for everyone to become equipped with rational arguments against xenophobia and racism! Victorien and Charlotte also propose ideas of how to work against populistic ideas and mindsets.
I wish you a pleasant reading and I am looking forward to continue this project. If you are interested in participating please send me a note.
Oestrich Winkel, Jan 20th 2017
With kind regards Marcus Kreikebaum
During the fall term semester, some friends and I decided to participate to
the SCI Do it! Project that come in help to refugees. The reasons we decided to
choose this action rather than any other is because they need help, they need
support and they need to be protected from the havoc of war. Moreover,
European people need to be educated about what is really going on in Syria and
other Middle-East country, they need to be enlightened and aware of the
condition in which refugees are living. That is the reason why we choose to be
part of this project, even if at our level we provide a small help, I truly believed it
made a difference to the people we have met at the camp. Our occupation was
to bring our help to the refugees at Lorch within the search of house, work and to
provide languages course so they can improve their German. We had in mind to
provide them concrete and useful solution to aid them to leave the old hospital,
renovated into an asylum for them. What we did not take in consideration was
their need of interaction and socialisation with people. We spend mainly our visit
in playing games with them, talking, sometime debating on specific subject. They
were truly in demand of comprehension and integration. They were curious about
us, about our culture, but they were more than willing to share their own culture
and knowledge. They needed more listening and attention than anything.
Therefore, we decided to bring them all the happiness we could, to cheer them
up. The topic I would like to elaborate on in this essay is related to social
consequences of my actions. Indeed, I notice a change in behaviour toward other
people between before the project and after.
At first the reason I decided to be involved in the refugee project was
because last year during my internship in Berlin I saw coming the wave of
refugees seeking shelter in park of the city and waiting for a better solution. It was
middle of winter and the weather was really awful and I asked myself why nothing
was done for them. It was really pitiful to see them wandering in the city center,
looking for some help, some food, anything that could help them get through the
winter. However, even if I did felt pity for them, I did nothing to bring them more
comfort. I saw them as potential threat as I was struggling to find a flat. Indeed,
the government implemented a law which forced landlord to rent their empty flat
at a low price to refugee if they did not found anybody before the end of the year.
It was really stressful and I did had the feeling that refugee were stealing my
chance to have an acceptable flat. However, I managed to find a flat with not so
much difficulties and the government decided to open unused building, such as
an old airport, to shelter the refugees. When the fear of not finding a flat
disappeared, I asked myself why I put all the blame on refugees. They did nothing
to deserve that, they were just flying a conflict and try to start again their life in a
new country. They do not speak the language, they do not understand the
administrative step in order to find a flat or find a job, they have to learn all again.
I thought that if I were in the same situation as them, I would be totally lost and I
would hope for some help. The second reason I wanted to participate to this
project is because in France as in U.S., populism start to gain more and more
power. As we saw, President Elected Donald Trump is willing to build a wall
between U.S. and Mexico. I wanted to understand what was about stranger that
could be so terrifying that it absolutely needs to separate population. I have
always been thought that we can learn from anybody at any time. What could
refugee teach me, what could I learn from them?
During the project we spent several hour at Lorch with refugees. At first
our goal was to help them improve their language skills and to find a job and a
flat. However, as we saw, they were more in demand of contact and distraction.
Therefore we decided to play games with them. First because it was a way to
practice German, but while having fun, and second we were building bound with
all of them. During one game, the rule was to draw something on a black board
and to make it guess to the others. We had in mind that the drawing would be
something like a dog, or a cat, or a house etc. But most of the drawing from the
refugees were really powerful and full of feelings. One of them draw himself
behind prison bar. Another draw a beach with a large sun and he call it “freedom”.
That was really an intense moment and all us were touched by those powerful
drawing. It is during this game that I really understand what it means to be
refugee. They all had dreams about their life that had been destroy by the war.
However, they still keep to fight for it. They still are willing to be part of Germany,
to be part of a community, to build again their life. Their strength is really
impressive and their willingness to succeed should be an example to follow for
all of us. They taught me not to give up on what I want. They also taught me to
be able to listen to other and to learn from them. A human being is not made to
live alone, we need to interact and to be confronted to other in order to be able to
grow and be strong.
In conclusion, after this experience I indeed changed my behaviour toward
others. I am now more able to accept and understand thinking and behaviour
different from mine. What is unusual is not anymore a threat, it is an opportunity
to learn and to grow. What I learn during this project is also an awareness about
the political change that are operating in the world but more precisely in France.
Indeed, with the gain in power of the Front National, France is now at risk to close
itself to immigration, which would be dramatic to the country. In a close future,
what I would like to do is to continue coming at Lorch to meet refugees that are
now friends, but also to raise awareness about the danger of the extreme right
party. Education system in France is not turned to the international aspect.
Children are confront to diversity only in the downside of it, they should be able
to make their own judgment knowing that diversity is a chance and not a threat.
In order to transfer what I have learned during this project, I plan to teach the
same thing I learn to every person I would be brought to meet but especially to
children and teenager. With them, we are the younger generation that will have
to change the balance in order to erase the fear of the unknown and the different,
and to accept and work with diversity.
EBS Business School Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht
Projekt Refugee Relief in Lorch
Fall Term 2016
Essay für Projekt Refugee Relief in Lorch
Student: Inan Tosun
Student-ID: 24032675
Submission date: 31.12.2016
Das zweite Refugee Project an der EBS wurde auf Basis des ersten Refugee Projects
weitergeführt. Unser erstes Projekt lief sehr erfolgreich, womit wir viele Erfahrungen und neue
Menschen und Kulturen kennenlernen konnten. Der Vorteil des ersten Projekts war, dass wir
ein Grundverständnis für die Situation der Flüchtlinge aufbauen konnten. Uns wurde somit
bewusst, woher und warum Menschen aus Krisenländern Unterschlupf in anderen sicheren
Ländern suchen. Gelernt haben wir, dass die Gründe unterschiedlich sind: Diktatorische
Verhältnisse, politische Verfolgungen und Bürgerkriege, die Menschen zu der Flucht zwingen,
z. B. in Äthiopien. Syrien, Jemen, Libyen und weiteren instabilen Ländern. Jeder einzelne
Fliehende verfügt über eine einzigartige und faszinierende Geschichte, die zugleich auch
immer eine traurige Facette hat. Der eine mit einem Lachen im Gesicht und der andere mit
einer starren Mimik. Während dem ersten Projekt hatte ich Ahmad kennengelernt, der mit
seiner Familie aus Syrien nach Deutschland geflohen ist. Ahmad vereinigte in sich alle Aspekte
des Krieges in Syrien und war dadurch für mich eine extreme Erfahrung. Unsere Familien
lernten sich immer näher kennen und Ahmad war bereit, sich zu öffnen und seine Gefühle und
Erfahrungen zu offenbaren. Er erzählte immer mehr Details über den Krieg in Syrien. Seine
Worte verfolgte ich besonders aufmerksam, denn Ahmad ist jemand, der aktiv im Krieg gegen
den IS mitgewirkt hat. Seine Geschichte ist mitreißend und sie aus dem Mund eines
mittlerweile guten Freundes zu hören, verleiht mir zunehmend das Gefühl, dass es eben nicht
nur ein Krieg der Syrer ist, sondern einer, der uns alle gleichermaßen betreffen sollte. So
beginne ich, mich näher damit auseinanderzusetzen.
Ich habe Ahmad als einen zuvorkommenden und offenen Menschen kennengelernt, der oft
lächelte. Man hat ihm seine Erfahrung im Krieg nie angesehen. Als ich ihn näher kennen lernte,
spürte ich über persönliche Gespräche, dass sich hinter dieser Fassade ein anderer Mensch
verbarg. Er war aktiv im Krieg beteiligt, um seine Familie und Freunde zu beschützen.
Nachdem er sich eine Verletzung zuzog, konnte er jedoch nicht mehr an der Front kämpfen.
So war Ahmad und seine Familie gezwungen, sein Heimatland zu verlassen.
Während viele solche Erlebnisse lieber verdrängen wollen, half es Ahmad mir alles über den
Krieg in Syrien aus seiner Perspektive zu erzählen.
Angefangen hat es mit einem Aufstand gegen den Diktator Assad, der zu gewaltigen
Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Regimegegner und dem Regime führte. Der Grund für die
Demonstrationen waren unter anderem die soziale Ungerechtigkeit unter Assad, Armut in den
ländlich besiedelten Gebieten und auch Vetternwirtschaft. Die Auseinandersetzungen gingen
so weit, dass Menschen willkürlich verhaftet, getötet und manche auch zu Tode gefoltert
wurden. Eskaliert ist der Aufstand nach dem Ereignis in Daraa.
Ahmad erzählte mir, dass in Daraa die größten Demonstrationen stattfanden und es das Regime
daher auf Daraa abgezielt hätte. Es folgten willkürliche Verhaftungen und Folter. Darauf folgte
der bewaffnete Protest in Homs und Hama und regelmäßige Massendemonstrationen.
Friedensvermittler der UNO haben sich für die Stabilisierung der Lage eingesetzt, doch das
syrische Regime hielt sich nicht an die Abmachungen. Laut Ahmad wussten alle, dass dieser
Zug einen Krieg einläuten wird. Im Sommer 2012 fielen dann die ersten Fassbomben. Das
syrische Regime versuchte mit immer brutaleren Mitteln die Aufstände niederzuschlagen.
Verzweifelt wurden Bodentruppen und auch Luftangriffe eingesetzt. Assad verlor die
Kontrolle über sein Land. Ahmad sagte, zu dem Zeitpunkt hatte ganz Syrien noch die Hoffnung
auf eine neue, bessere Zukunft. Aber was danach geschehen ist, hätte niemand erahnen können.
Internationale Dschihadisten kamen über die Grenze von der Türkei nach Syrien. Die Lage
verschlimmerte sich, bis schließlich der Krieg in allen Teilen des Landes war. Ahmad war zu
dem Zeitpunkt in Kobane, einer Stadt, die kurdisch besiedelt ist und vom Krieg noch weit
entfernt war.
Erst als die Dschihadisten immer weitere Gebiete Syriens kontrollierten, hat man angefangen
sich zu bewaffnen. Denn der Krieg hatte die Kurden bisher nicht beeinflusst.
Ahmad erzählte, dass der IS gefährlich sei und keine Minderheiten akzeptiere, was ihnen keine
andere Wahl ließ, als mit der Bewaffnung zu beginnen. Gegen Ende 2014 griffen die
Dschihadisten dann wie befürchtet Kobane an. Ahmad sagte, es sei ein ungleicher Kampf
gewesen. Während die Kurden nur alte Waffen hatten, besaßen die Dschihadisten
hochmoderne Waffen und sogar Panzer, mit denen sie Kobane angriffen. Kobane grenzt an der
Türkei und ist somit für die Dschihadisten von entscheidender Bedeutung, um neue Kämpfer
über die Grenzen nach Syrien zu rekrutieren. Ahmad sagte: „der Krieg ist auch zu uns
gekommen“. Der Westen der Stadt wurde mit Granaten beschossen, der Osten mit Artillerie.
Viele Zivilisten verließen die umliegenden Dörfer und flüchteten in die Innenstadt, wo sie
Zuflucht bekamen. Nachdem der IS immer mehr Dörfer einnahm, standen sie zwei Kilometer
vor der Stadtgrenze. Ahmad erzählte überzeugt, wie selbstgebaute Panzerfahrzeuge, die aus
zivilen Fahrzeugen mit Stahlplatten gebaut wurden, Schutz gegen leichte Waffen boten. Er
selbst habe diese „Panzer“ mitgebaut. Doch der IS rückte immer näher und die von den
Vereinigten Staaten geführte Koalition begann IS-Stelllungen in der Nähe von Kobane aus der
Luft zu bombardieren. Dieser Angriff war sehr effektiv, weil sie den Vormarsch der Milizen
verzögerte. Ahmad erzählte, dass sie im Kampf gegen die IS-Milizen optimistisch waren und
sicher waren, dass sie gewinnen werden. Nichtsdestotrotz kam der IS immer näher zur
Stadtgrenze. Ahmad war unterdessen an der Front und kämpfe mit seinen Kollegen. Die IS-
Milizen beschossen seine Stellung immer heftiger. Seine Mitkämpferin, Arin Mirkan verließ
ihre Stellung, um den Panzer zu zerstören, die die Stellung beschoss. Ahmad und seine
Kollegen baten Arin ihre Stellung nicht zu verlassen, doch sie hielt es nicht aus, nichts gegen
den Panzer unternehmen zu können. Sie begab sich in akute Lebensgefahr, obwohl sie
verheiratet und Mutter von zwei Kindern war.
Arin zerstörte den Panzer mit einer Granate, die sie in unter dem Panzer explodieren ließ. Dabei
starb auch sie. Durch ihre selbstaufopfernde Tat konnten Ahmad und seine Kollegen die
Stellung verlassen und dem Tod entkommen. Ahmad sagte: „ihre Tat hat einen Panzer und 16
Gegner getötet. Sie hat dadurch unser Leben gerettet, mein Leben. Ihretwegen sitze ich noch
hier. In solch einem Krieg kämpft man nicht nur um sein eigenes Überleben, man kämpft für
seine Freunde, Familie und die Zukunft. Arin verkörpert für mich die Zukunft. Sie ließ einen
Mann und zwei Kinder zurück für deren Zukunft, für unsere Zukunft. Ich werde immer an sie
denken“. Trotz massiver Luftangriffe der US-Koalition rückten die US-Milizen immer näher.
Ahmad sagte: „Ich sah die IS-Fahne wehen, niemand von uns war jetzt in der Stadt sicher“.
Ahmad schickte seine Kinder und Frau zu einem Bekannten, der über die Grenze zur Türkei
flüchten will. Er selbst wollte immer noch kämpfen. „Ich kämpfe nicht für mich, ich kämpfe
für unsere Familien, für mein Volk und Arin“. Die IS-Kämpfer drangen in das Stadtgebiet
hinein. An diesem Tag verließen bis zu 2.000 weitere Zivilisten die Stadt, doch es waren immer
noch 12.000 Zivilisten in der Stadt. Die IS-Milizen setzten immer wieder Panzer und
Autobomben ein, um weiter vorzurücken. Die kurdischen Kämpfer konnten die Angriffe der
IS-Kämpfer abwehren, aber das Vorrücken der IS-Kämpfer nicht aufhalten. Sie besetzten nun
40 Prozent des Stadtgebietes. Nach tagelangen Kämpfen wendete sich das Blatt langsam und
die kurdischen Kämpfer konnten die IS-Kämpfer aus der Stadt zurückdrängen. „Das war der
Beginn des Rückzuges der IS-Kämpfer, sie haben den Kampf gegen uns verloren“. Die
humanitäre Lage für die verbliebenen Zivilisten war allerdings katastrophal. Die Stadt war
zerstört und es fehlte an Medizin und Nahrung. Ahmad sagte: „auf den Straßen lagen viele tote
IS-Kämpfer, die Infrastruktur war zerstört, es war kalt und wir hatten kaum was zu essen“.
Durch die US-Koalition durchgeführten Luftangriffe gegen den IS konnten die kurdischen
Kämpfer eine Gegenoffensive gegen den IS starten und sie aus der Stadt verdrängen. Ahmad
wurde dabei verletzt. „Ich wurde leicht verletzt, aber war nicht mehr kampffähig. Die
medizinische Versorgung in Kobane war schlecht, daher wurde ich in ein Krankenhaus in der
Türkei eingeliefert, wo ich wieder meine Familie gesehen habe. Ich war glücklich, dass meine
Familie wohlauf war. In den Nachrichten habe ich erfahren, dass der IS endgültig aus Kobane
zurückgedrängt wurde“. Ahmad und seine Familie kamen nach einer langen Reise in
Deutschland an. Ich hatte Ahmad im Rahmen meines außercurricularen Engagements
kennengelernt. Unsere Familie treffen sich gelegentlich.
Seine Geschichte inspirierte mich für unser zweites Projekt. Ich kann mir heute vorstellen, was
Krieg bedeutet. Das ist etwas, was man nicht im Geschichtsunterricht oder aus der Zeitung
lernt. Krieg ist einerseits verheerend und prägt dich für dein Leben, andererseits zeigt es was
für ein Typ Mensch du bist. Krieg hat viele Seiten. Man hat die Helden, die gefeiert werden,
die Unschuldigen, die nichts damit zu tun haben, die Verräter, die Lügner und die, die vom
Herzen Menschen sind, mit all ihren Stärken und Schwächen. Dass Ahmad seine Erfahrung
mit mir teilte, lehrte mir aber noch etwas anderes Essenzielles: Teamwork. Der Sieg der
kurdischen Kämpfer wäre durch Teamwork nicht passiert. Ahmad hatte mit Menschen im
Krieg zusammengekämpft, die er nie zuvor gesehen hatte. Er kannte diese Personen gar nicht
und würde ihnen normalerweise nie sein Leben anvertrauten. Doch im Krieg bzw. in diesen
schwierigen Situationen hat sich das geändert. Sie haben zusammengearbeitet, um ein
kollektives Ziel zu erreichen. Wie bereits erwähnt, hat der Krieg viele Gesichter und hält daher
eine Überraschung für einen offen, welche Person neben einem kämpft. Ist diese Person ein
Verräter, ein Lügner oder doch ein Freund? Man weiß es nicht. In der schwierigen Situation
dieser Menschen gab es jedoch keine Alternative als zusammenzuarbeiten mit Menschen, die
man nie in seinem Leben gesehen hat. Teamwork schweißt Menschen zusammen und macht
es deutlicher einfacher ein kollektives Ziel zu erreichen. Die Kräfte, die dadurch entstehen,
stellen das restliche Risiko in den Schatten.
Diese Erkenntnis ist auch für uns in Deutschland wichtig. Wir haben den großen Ansturm der
Menschen - nicht der "Flüchtlinge" -, die in Not sind, nur deshalb überstanden, weil das Land
Deutschland durch individuelle Helfer und großem Teamwork zwischen den Helfern und dem
Staat zusammengearbeitet haben. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben wir das zweite Projekt an der
EBS Universität gestartet. Man kann es auch so nennen: Studenten helfen Menschen in Not.
Wir sind nur Studenten aus unterschiedlichen Ländern und Kulturen, und trotzdem sind wir
ein Team. Keiner von uns hat das erlebt bzw. wir haben es nicht mitbekommen als es uns traf,
wir waren noch klein. Wir sind die Studenten der EBS Universität, die Malteser Beihilfe
geleistet haben, um ein Stück ihrer Verantwortung zu übernehmen und sie zu entlasten. Wir
können und dürfen die Verantwortung nicht auf andere schieben. Jeder ist von dieser Krise
betroffen, obwohl der Ursprung dieser Krise über 3.000 Kilometer weit entfernt liegt. Jeder
einzelne kann seinen Beitrag dafür leisten, auch wenn es nur eine Stunde in der Woche ist.
Wir sind in dem Projekt mit Offenheit gegenüber ihnen gestartet. Denn wir haben vom ersten
Projekt mitgenommen, dass gerade einige von ihnen, obwohl sie Schlimmes hinter sich hatten,
sich öffnen, wenn man es auch tut. Deshalb war uns wichtig, besonders darauf zu achten, dass
wir das Projekt von Beginn an mit großer Offenheit und Freundlichkeit angehen. Angesichts
der Tatsache, dass diese Menschen ihre Existenz verloren und weder Hoffnung noch
Orientierung für die Zukunft haben, ist es vonnöten, dass wir die Initiative ergreifen. Wir, ob
Student, Erzieher, Hausfrau, Arbeitnehmer oder Arbeitgeber müssen diese Personen die
Grundlagen einer neuen Zukunft ermöglichen. Durch Teamwork aller Beteiligten. In diesem
Semester haben wir schmerzlich sehen müssen, wie es immer noch diejenigen gibt, die
„Flüchtlingen“ keine Wohnungen vermieten oder keinen Job geben wollen. Gerade diese
Personen müssen wir mit unserem Teamwork und der Gastfreundlichkeit als Teil einer neuen
deutschen Tugend überzeugen. Keine von denen, die gegen die Flüchtlinge sind, haben jetzt
weniger zu essen oder weniger Geld. Sie sind nur wütend über den Umstand, dass sie nicht
mehr Geld oder zu essen bekommen und nehmen fälschlicherweise an, dass die Anwesenheit
der „Flüchtlinge“ damit etwas zu tun hätten. Ihre Wut ist vielmehr Frustration, nicht das neuste
Auto zu fahren oder das größte Haus zu haben. Deshalb sind sie gegen unser Helfen. Aber
braucht man Reichtum um glücklich zu werden? Würden diese Menschen dieselbe Haltung zu
Reichtum haben, wenn sie wie ich jemanden wie Ahmad kennenlernen würden? Das wäre
unvorstellbar. Keiner von den „Flüchtlingen“ ist reich, und doch sind viele von ihnen glücklich,
wie Ahmad. Sie wissen nun umso mehr, dass es nicht Reichtum ist, dass sie glücklich macht,
sondern ihre Familien und ihre Mitmenschen. Unsere Bemühungen, um ihnen zu helfen,
werden diese Menschen noch glücklicher machen, obwohl sie kein Reichtum haben.
Das Projekt zeigte mir, dass Reichtum mich nie glücklich machen wird und dass Teamwork in
unserem Leben essenziell ist, um Fortschritt zu schaffen. Wir leben in einer Welt, die ohne
Teamwork nicht wiederzuerkennen wäre. Das Haus in dem wir leben, haben wir durch
Teamwork gebaut. Einzeln wäre es viel zu schwer gewesen. Unser Auto wurde durch die
Zusammenarbeit verschiedener Menschen gebaut und die Flüchtlingskrise wird durch
Zusammenarbeit mit Menschen aus verschiedenen Ländern und Kulturen bewältigt werden.
BSCSocioCulturalImpact«DoIt!»
FallTerm2016
EssayRefugeesatLorch
AymericBOURDON24132881SubmissionDate:31stDecember2016Submittedto:Dr.MarcusKreikebaum
SCIEssay
This semester EBS offered us the opportunity to take part in several socio-
culturalprojects,IdecidedtointegratetheRefugeesProgramtakingplaceinLorch.This
projectaimedatprovidinghelpandsupporttorefugeescomingfromdifferentcountries
suchasSyriaorAfghanistan…IdecidedtochoosethisprojectbecauseIhavealways
beenwillingtohelpotherpeopleandbecauserefugeescrisisisaveryactualtopic,which
hasbeendiscussednumeroustimesinmedias.Then,thisprojectwastheopportunity
formetomeetsomeofthembymyselftogettheirthoughtswithoutanyintermediary
and make my own opinion. In the end, forced me to question myself about some
certitudeIhad.
Idecidedtostructurethisessayaroundthepolitical,ethicalandphilosophicalaspects.
Indeed, as a fighter pilot for the French Air Force my father went several times in
Afghanistan,LybiaandmorerecentlySyriatofightjihadisminthesecountries.Mostthe
time,Iconsideredtheoccidentalforcesoperatinginthesecountriesas“thegoodguys”,
however facingrefugeescoming fromthesecountries forcedmetoquestionmyself.
Whatdotheythinkofus?Howdotheyseeourinterventionintheircountries?What
aretheylookingforhereinoccident?
During this project, I met and bounded strongly with two young men,
Mohammed and Ahmed coming respectively from Afghanistan and Syria. The
experienceofmeetingthesetwopeopleisprobablywhatshookmethemost.Before
startingtheprogram,IwasawareIwillhavetofacepeoplefromthesecountriesand
Imightfacesomeuncomfortablesituation.However,Iheavilyunderestimatehow
muchIwouldfeelsometimes.
AsIpreviouslysaidinmyjournal,thePictionarygameweplayedseveraltimesat
Lorch,isaverypowerfultooltoexpressfeelingsorperspective.WhenIdecidedto
drawa jetplane, Ididn’tanticipateatallAhmed’sanswerwhichwas“war”.This
answertriggeredsomethinginmeandIdecidedtotalkwithhimafterwards.Arewe
theincarnationofwar?Ismyfatherdoingtherightthing?Ishethepersonification
ofwar?Isawhimmanytimescomingbackhomedisturbedandaskinghimselfthe
samequestion.Atthistime,andforthefirsttimeinmylife,Iwasfeelingashamed
ofwhatmyfatheris.
Asmostofusknow,whatishappeningnowismiddle-eastandspeciallyinSyriaisa
verycomplexconflictopposing4mainsforces:thepro-Assad,therebelswhowant
to create a new and more democratic government, IS (Islamic State) using the
conflicttoincreaseitsinfluence,andtheKurdsfightingfortheindependenceofthe
Kurdistan. Inthisconflict,theoccidentalcoalition(USA,France,UK…)supportthe
rebels, however, during war nobody’s completely white, and collateral damages
happen.
My first thoughtswere that refugees running away fromwar, are running away
becausetheydon’tbelieveinthiswarandwantabetterlifethatoccidentcanoffer.
However,Ahmedexplainedmethatmostoftherefugeesbelieveinthisfight,they
aremostlyrunningawayfromAssad’sregimeandISbutsupporttherebelcauseas
the occidental coalition. Despite assimilating jet planes to war, occidental
interventionwasseenpositively.Hedoesn’tseeustheoccidentalcountryinterfering
withhishomepoliticbutasanallyimpersonatingfreedom,offeringapotentialbut
temporarysolution. Indeed,on thecontraryofwhatsomemediasorpeoplesay,
refugeesarenotlookingforabetterlifeinoccidenttotakeadvantageofthesystem,
mostofthemdreamofgoingbacktotheirhomecountry.However,occidentoffers
afreedomtheyaredeniedintheircountry,thisisthereasonoftheirescape.
Freedomisaveryabstractconceptthatweusedtoconsiderasacquiredinoccident,
however this conflicts shows us that it’s not, and this probably one of themost
important lessonI learnedduringmyexchangeswithAhmedorMohammed.You
mustfightforiteveryday,andwhenyouhavethechancetoenjoyit,youneedto
beawareofit.
Toconclude,despitebeingsometimesverydisturbingfromanemotional
perspective,thisexperiencewiththerefugeesinLorchwasveryinstructiveand
satisfying.Iwouldn’thavechangedforanyotherproject.IamgratefulforwhatI
learnedthankstotheseseveralexchanges,Ihavetoadmitthatintheend,I
probablylearntmorefromthemthanwhatIexpected.
Thisexperiencehelpedmetounderstandbetteroneofthemostimportantcurrent
geopolitical problem, the refugee crisis and its environment. Furthermore,
concerningtheroleoccidentalcountriesplayintheseconflictsandbyextensionthe
rolemyfatherplayed,thereisprobablyno“goodguys”butyouneedtofightfor
whatyoubelievein.
Thisexperiencewasalsoalessonoflife,aboutfreedomandhappiness.Indeed,from
theirperspective,happinesscomesfromoneofthemostimmaterialthingbutmost
importantthingintheworld:freedom.Thisissomethingwetendtoforgetinour
countryandthatIwouldliketopromoteafterthisexperience:happinessisatour
fingertipswhenyouarefree.
Essay
Fall term 2016
Refugee Project – Experiences at LorchName: Marius Diedrich (24032716) Address: Am Erntebringer 2, 65366 Geisenheim Submitted to: Dr. Marcus Kreikebaum Submission Date: 31.12.2016
The refugee crisis was one of last year’s central topics and will change our demographic and cultural situation significantly. Although the immigration offers opportunities for Germany, many people are scared and have prejudices against the refugees. Therefore, I decided to join the EBS refugee project, in order to get a deeper understanding of the people and their background as well as support them in their new situation. During the project we worked in a refugee camp located in Lorch. The people live in old military barracks and the first time we met together with the whole team I felt quiet uncomfortable as it is a depressing place and you don’t feel welcomed. Furthermore, the place is quiet isolated and its very dark in the evening due to a limited number of lanterns. However, I was quiet impressed by the refugees that I met on the first day at Lorch. They were very open minded and interested in our project. It stood out that most of them spoke good German although they haven’t been here for a quiet long time which I found remarkable. Another person that we got to know the first day is Nuran Özdemir. She is a refugee coordinator working for the Malteser and acts as a contact person for any kind of inquiries or problems regarding the refugee camp. Coming from turkey herself and having worked in the local bakery she also connects the refugees and the community of Lorch. She is a very charismatic person and a real power woman who supported us during our whole project. During a first discussion round with Mr. Kreikebaum and Mrs. Özdemir, we figured out the main problems which the refugees are facing and thought about ways on how we can support them. We formed different teams, each of which had a different area of responsibility. I took the lead of the housing team which consisted of 5 other students and myself. Our goal was it to support the refugees in finding an appropriate accommodation outside the refugee camp which is an important task as some refugees need to leave the camp after a certain amount of time in order to be able to stay in Germany. During the project we hang-up lists at Lorch in which the refugees could sign-in if they are looking for an accommodation. However, even though we collected many requests, our task turned out to be quite a challenge for multiple reasons. First of all, most of the landlords are not willing to rent out their apartments to refugees because they are scared or don’t feel comfortable doing it. An impression that I kept in mind was when a landlord told me that he is not willing to rent out his apartment to “terrorists”. I believe that more awareness needs to be raised to overcome those prejudices. Secondly it was hard for us to find accommodations due to political issues. A refugee needs a certain status in order to rent a flat on his own, otherwise the Job Center will decline the request to pay for the accommodation. As most of the refugees don’t even know if they have this status, it was difficult for us to figure out if we can already start with the search or not. Finally, I was very shocked how uncooperative the Job Center is when they receive requests about refugees. It took us dozens of calls to ask for the budget that refugees have available for their rent in certain areas as they always claimed not to be responsible or even hang up the phone. This was a really frustrating experience but didn’t kept us from continue trying. In the next semester, the housing team and myself will continue our work and I hope that we will be able to find suitable accommodations for as many refugees as possible. During the project time we went to Lorch on a weekly basis. At the beginning I still felt a bit uncomfortable as it was a completely new situation for me and I wasn’t sure whether the refugees are really interested in our support. However, it became clear that my doubts were unjustified and that the refugees were really happy to meet us. During my time in Lorch I got into contact with many different persons and it was very interesting to listen to their stories and backgrounds. One very remarkable conversation that really bothered me was with Ali, a Syrian refugee who lives in Lorch for around a year now. He told me that he fled from Syria after his wife and two children were killed during a bomb attack. Traveling the route over the Mediterranean See, he described how hard and dangerous his trip to Germany was and that he often had doubt if he would ever arrive. Afterwards, I asked him where he took the power to flee across multiple countries after having lost the most important persons in his life. It was a
quiet emotional conversation and he told me that it has been the toughest time of his life but that he believes that one should never give up and that life is worth living. I was really impressed by his attitude and learned from this conversation that one should try to look forward and not give up. Another refugee that I got to know and to who I had quiet close contact to is Mohammad, a 47-year-old Syrian. He is a painter and fled from Syria together with his family. What I found quiet remarkable is that he told me that even though he isn’t together with his wife anymore, they fled together in order to bring themselves and especially their daughter safely to Germany. His experience and emotions are reflected in his paintings which he loved to show us during our time in Lorch (see appendix – picture 3). Mohammad is a really warm-hearted person and I was really impressed by his paintings which often focused on the topic of war and pain. Furthermore, we discussed the situation about the refugee crisis in Germany and he told me that he is really sad that so many people are scared and believe that the refugees are responsible for bringing the terror of the Islamic State to Germany. His point of view made me think about how the refugees are accepted by large parts of the German population and I believe that a problem is that many of them are stereotyped. When talking about these people most Germans refer to them by “the refugees” which is a mistake in my opinion as all refugees that I got to know are completely different persons with own believes and opinions. It is therefore important to be open-minded and to form an own opinion. A third refugee who really impressed me during the project was a twelve years old boy who I got to know when my team and me participated in the child care at Lorch. He told me that his mother was shot in front of his eyes in Syria, which really shocked me in the first place because this must be the worst experience that a child can encounter. I was impressed but also confused at the same time because he was able to talk about such an event quiet unemotional. This made me think about if he was maybe suffering from a posttraumatic stress disorder. I believe that it is necessary to offer more psychological assistance to the refugees, as many of them have encountered potential traumatic experiences. This is a topic which I would like to bring up during the next semester as I believe that such an assistance is from vital importance. In conclusion the refugee project was a great success and I believe that our whole team really made a change. It showed me how privileged we live in Germany and how lucky most of us are to never have encountered such a terrible war. All refugees that I met during my time in Lorch were extremely thankful for our support and I believe that it is important to help those people to build up a new life. I look forward to continue the project next semester and hope that we are able to help the refugees to make the next step into their new life.
FinalEssay/MalikFredericBriki/studentnumber:24032708/31.12.2016
My final essay is about the trip to Wiesbaden, which was held on the 04th of November 2016.
Based on this trip, I would like to talk about my learning with the people from Lorch.
Furthermore, I would like to mention my learnings from the Malteser and about what I learned
about myself. Using this trip as an example, I would like to interpret and transfer my
experiences.
First, I would like to give a short overview about this trip with agenda provided. Our original
idea was to take our two Syrian friends from Lorch to a football match of the German
Bundesliga. However, we could not compromise an available date for all of us to attend the
match. Therefore, we decided to do a half day trip to Wiesbaden with them. Me and two friends
from EBS invited our two Syrian friends for a lunch in a typical oriental (Arabic) store.
Afterwards, we went grocery shopping. Finally, we did a short city tour before heading back to
Lorch. The feedback from our two Syrian friends was very impressive. They enjoyed a lot
during the trip and were very thankful and happy obviously.
This thankfulness and hospitality from them lead to my first learning effect from the people. I
think it is very important sometimes to just keep silent and be happy with my current situation
and living standard. This trip showed me how happy people can be if they have the chance to
experience for our living standard apparently small gifts, like this trip.
Furthermore, I learned from them how to deal with difficult situation and hide to emotional
feeling in front of others. My two friends experienced both individually very hard fates. Hani
who is 29 years old is originally from Daraa in the south west of Syria. A city that is extremely
destroyed from the war and currently occupied mostly by the ISIS fighters. He came to
Germany nearly 2 years ago. He started his long way alone, leaving his family in a dangerous
situation, to help them in the future. His brother is currently working in factory in Turkey under
horrible conditions and the rest of his family escaped just some weeks ago from Syria, in a very
dangerous night escape. They needed to stitch some Turkish soldiers in order to escape.
Achmed who is just 18 years old is originally from Damaskus, one of the most well known
cities when hearing about the Syria war. He came to Germany nearly 2 years ago as well. He
has some cousins and uncles in Germany as well but doesn’t have a lot contact with them. He
is already married in Syria and wishes to bring his 17 year old wife to Germany as soon as
possible. Taking those two very hard fates in comparison with the long escape way by feet in
consideration I would not be sure if I can keep up a positive mindset and mood. I admire them
for their optimistic and brave acting. This is definitely one key learning effect.
FinalEssay/MalikFredericBriki/studentnumber:24032708/31.12.2016
Moreover, I certainly learnt some interpersonal communication skills from them. For instance,
to interact in a very understandable and practical way to communicate with people who I have
never met or talked. The lunch with two Syrian friends in Wiesbaden can related to this. During
the lunch, Hani and Achmed have already made friends with the waiters from the restaurant
after a very short time. I was very impressed by their interaction skills and from this I can
improve my future actions.
Apart from that, I have learnt more and improved my Arabic from them. I have basic Arabic
knowledge due to my family’s background. While checking after their German exercises, they
taught me more about the Arabic language and culture in return. This experience was very
unique and effective in terms of my learning efforts.
In addition, I learnt a high degree of comradeship from them. The two Syrian did not know
each other before they came to Germany. However, since they are here, they got along so well
and became best friends, they always share same experiences and thoughts. This has shown to
me that how those negatives and painful experiences have made them stick together and literally
share their last piece of bread.
To sum up, I learnt from them to always keep a positive thought about the future. They are
confronted with negative influences and rejections, for example from job applications everyday.
However, they are still very positive and thankful for they are having now. I wish as well to
think more in an optimistic way like they do.
Second, I learnt a lot from the Malteser staffs as well. They were very friendly and helpful and
gave so many advices and assistants for me as a student coming there. Hereby, I would like to
specifically mentioned Mrs. Özdemir, one of the officers, she did not mind to spend longer time
on explaining to me clearly about the refugee laws and policies. She made me have a better
understanding on the procedures and requirements for the refugees in Germany. Besides, she
shared to me some of the boundaries and difficulties of refugees, both living inside and outside
of the refugee camp. Lastly, from the way the Malteser staffs work has made me to appreciate
more about these kind of organizations. Without their efforts on helping the refugees, the
situation of the refugee camp would not be the same as what I saw today, could have been a lot
more chaotic.
Third, I learned a lot about myself. I was able to apply some of my core strengths for the refugee
project. First, I used my strength to listen because every refugee has their own background and
problems. Therefore, it is essential to listen every single of them carefully. In the next steps, I
FinalEssay/MalikFredericBriki/studentnumber:24032708/31.12.2016
used my strengths to focus on each individual and analyze their current situation to further
achieve a substantial result. Afterwards, I organized the unclear situation and create a roadmap
how to further continue. Finally, I got into the position, after clarifying each strengths, values
and interests to negotiate which job is best for them in order to start their own life out of the
camp.
Moreover, the refugee project gave me the real opportunity to have insights in a practical way
about the refugee crisis in Germany. This is very useful for myself in order to built a well
elaborated opinion about the whole situation. As soon as many right-oriented parties gain votes
in Germany I believe it is essential to have good arguments in order to cope with them.
Besides, I learned about myself how much fun and joy the work with the two Syrian friends
made for me. I enjoyed every meeting in Lorch and it was a very nice contrast for the daily life
at EBS for me.
As a final reflection I can say that I kept three essential. I learned to be more patient with
different people and I think I think I developed a good feeling when to listen more to the people
and when to be more active. Furthermore, I further improved my communication skills. The
continuous language exchange gave me the opportunity to learn a language in a very practical
way with a lot of happiness. Lastly, I learned to appreciate more my current life standard. For
my generation who grew up in a safe environment in Germany it is very difficult to understand
the feelings and thoughts from people escaping from a war region to a completely new
environment. I believe after this project I am able to understand better the stress and fears of
my Syrian friends. I hope the war comes to an end soon and more people have the opportunity
to life in a safe environment.
EBS Business School
EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht
SCI Individual Projects Fall Term 2016
SCI Essay: Refugees
Name (Matriculation-No.): Pierre-Louis Zumbihl (n°24132926)
Submitted to: Prof. Dr. Marcus Kreikebaum
Submission Date: 31.12.2016
Introduction
Thanks to the SCI course and Mr. Kreikebaum because during this semester I
had the opportunity to invest some of my time in a humanitarian aid. I am convinced
that it is necessary to ask students from the European Business School to have an
experience for this kind of actions. It is not something common to do such activities in
business school and I am sure that it is essential in all type of schools and universities to
open the mind of students. Understand humanitarian aid as helping old people, disable
and refugees is necessary to develop cultural values and also analyzing social
consequences. Concerning my choice I wanted to help the refugees because it was
something that was important in my but also to realize exactly what was going on. Since
5 years, they suffer from a horrible situation in their country and do not have the choice
to leave it. I wanted to ask myself, how would I react if it were my case? How do they
find all these strengths to battle this situation? How can we help them to be more
adapted to Germany and help them to give some happiness? In this paper I am going to
explain a discussion and a friendship that I had during my experience at Lorch.
Furthermore, I will also describe what I gained from this experience and what I am
going to do after this involvement.
The 24th November we had a great party at Lorch with many refugees and many
students. It was incredible all the efforts made by both of them to enjoy this night. We
played all together around a dinner made by the students, the professor and the refugees.
It was a magical moment to see all of these smiles in the face of everyone. I really learn
something that night.
Every week it was a pleasure to come to Lorch to visit the refugees. It was a
time to disconnect to the typical courses that I have at EBS and give some of my time to
the refugees. At the beginning I was a bit anxious to go there because I never had
contact with refugees before and I did not know how I would react. I was scared to be
sad and touched because of what the media is showing us through Internet and the
television. However I was really surprised about my thoughts before coming to Lorch
and what I actually discovered there. They were so welcoming and happy to meet some
students. Once, I met Mohammad, he is a Syrian. He was really passionate by the
painting. He shows me all of his work and I was surprised by his inspiration. We
discussed many times together. Every week he showed me his works. All of his painting
expressed a truth emotion. My friend and I decided to call him “Picasso” as a nickname.
Mohammad is a really sensitive person. After several weeks we developed a nice
relationship and we had some deep conversations together. I always wanted to know
what really happened in Syria and not my thoughts through the media. However, I never
asked one of the refugees during the semester to explain me something. I always wanted
to know it if they wanted to discuss about the situation in their countries and their life
stories. By the time he was more willing to express his feelings and discuss about his
life story. I was really impressed about his strengths because he explained me some
parts of his story before coming to Europe with an absolute calm. However, I saw that
there were still some nostalgia and some pain which is normal after what they lived.
After this discussion it was important for me to think about how and what can I do to
for him. Following few weeks I started to know them well and I developed a better
relationship with everyone but even more with Mohammad. We discussed further about
our life in Germany and how it was going for us. We saw that our presence helped them
to be more integrated. I also saw Mohammed more and more integrated into the group
of refugees and with the student. One of the last weeks I received a present from
Mohammad, it was drawings’ graffiti with my nickname (Appendix). I was really
touched about his gift. It was for me an emotional moment. The week after I also
wanted to offer him something typical from my region as a present to thank him for the
beautiful present that he offered me. He was also touched by this gesture. I hope I will
still have contact with him and with the other, as they are all a good persons.
What I learn is that we do not need a lot to make people happy. I also saw that
even with if we have a different culture we have a lot of respect each other. It was
important for me to show my cultural values and to see and understand their cultural
values. During all my experience I was happy to speak German, communication is a
very important aspect and I wanted to help them to improve this language. It is
necessary for us to communicate in German and it was a good opportunity for me to
learn and to practice. It was also a good opportunity for them in order to be more
adapted to the country. Using an inquiry method was appropriate to understand them by
asking questions. My leadership style is more relations oriented and that was a benefit
because I like supporting people and project, and also developing people. It was
interesting to use this behavior to help the refugees to get more integrated. It was
interesting for my point of view to see how to improve it. This experience in term of
leadership was positive for career ambitions. I would like to work as a strategic
manager.
Conclusion
I am an open-minded person and when I had the opportunity to be in contact and
help the refugees I did not hesitate one second. However this experience shows me
different things that I did not know. I already know that it is important to give a lot from
you and it is also important to take a lot from the other. Nevertheless, taking from the
other was a benefit for me to learn, improve and understand. I learnt that cultural values
are here to be shared. As I said before I improved my communications skills and my
leadership skills. I understand that it is not because they are refugees that they are
different than us. They just wanted to leave the horror that they are suffering in their
countries. Our mission is to help and integrate them but also to give them a better life as
they had before this atrocity. This experience changed my life and I will never forget it.
I will keep continuing to help as much as possible people who need it because I never
know when I will really need it and I will be more than happy to receive help from
someone else.
Feelingsaboutthissemester'sproject:
During a few months, I had the opportunity to visit a camp for refugees every
week in Lorch, Germany (Hessen). One of the reasons why I chose this project
amongst others is that I was expecting an important cultural shock; I was expecting to
learn a lot about a new culture with different habits. Also, I have always been
"fascinated" by the travel and the braveness of those people crossing borders and
traveling the world, hoping for a better future.
Then, I was happy to be able to help them and I couldn't wait meeting them.
Our team composed with M. Kreikebaum and other EBS students had a lot of projects
such as housing, job search, CV writing, teaching-learning German, using the
"computer room" from the Malteser center, etc. At first, I was a bit disappointed that
the projects took long time to get implemented and that we couldn't meet refugees for
a while.
After meeting refugees several time, I realized they don't only need to find
jobs and houses. This is one of my biggest finding and learning about this experience!
Parallel with getting out of the camp, they need to be entertained. The camp is not
closed but still they can't really move around and travel the region. Therefore, most of
the refugees study German in the morning and have a whole free afternoon and
evening. Some of them are in the camp for several months, which makes a lot of
afternoons and evenings. I realized that after all the difficulties they had to travel
Europe and now feeling lonely here in Germany, our presence is already a lot for their
"mental health" and morale. Just by being there, laughing, playing games together, we
could entertain them, make them laugh and forget about everything during two hours.
I noticed a very heterogeneous group of people coming to our weekly
meetings: almost all of the attendees are men but they have various education level,
family situations, language skills, etc. One of my biggest fears was communication:
both the refugees and us, French people studying in EBS have medium or low level of
German. I was afraid that I couldn't communicate with them. It was sometimes the
case, but it was never a problem. I had many things to tell them, but I couldn't express
it in German or they couldn't understand what I mean. Therefore, I learned to "speak
simple" in German; to use body language, and I even discovered that speaking is not
necessary. Through simple signs, simple eyes-looks, smiles, we were able to makes
jokes, and understand each other enough to have a lot of fun. Being happy with very
simple things! To my surprise, this "vocabulary" is almost not different between our
cultures. This should be an argument against populism: first of all refugees are no
mean people of course, but also they react to the same things, which proves it is not
complicate to understand each other. I was for instance impressed by Abdelaziz’s (a
young kid attending our meetings) level of German after only a few months in the
country.
Of course taking care of refugees is not easy for the government; especially
adults, but those children are the future of Germany; probably Europe: they integrate
themselves very easily, learn languages quickly, they are ready to give their best at
work and their diverse origins are a strength in every domain.
Thanks to the past few months, I learned that the "refugees crisis" is simpler to
solve than I expected. Also, everyone can contribute to their integration: tasks go
from basic fun to complicate job-search or housing. Also, I learned that everyone can
friend anyone, and that friendship does not require long dialogs.
Recommendationsfornextsemester'sproject
Situationofwomeninthecamp
I noticed that almost no woman came to our meetings during this semester.
Most of them are shy and afraid to come to such meetings. We could remark this
problem even more during the party, where they have been very shy. To me, it's an
important problem that needs to be solved as soon as possible. Women deserve to
have their daily distraction as much as men who attend our meetings. By the way,
there are a lot of female students coming with us! No reason not to mix up.
After thinking about their culture, and using the few things I know about their
habits; I suggest women-only sessions at Lorch (in a first phase). Female students
could meet up with female refugees and behave the same as during regular meetings
(men will be refused at the entrance of the room). It could be held regularly (e.g.
every Tuesday, women-only session at Lorch!). Some simple projects could be done
with female, to create team spirit, and especially mutual trust! (Between refugees and
students: they have to feel that we're here to help them and entertain them, that it
could be nice for them to come to the meeting again, etc.). After building this
relationship, we could mix females and males progressively (for example at a party,
as we did last semester). In the long term, the objective is to have men and women
discussing with students in the room at the same time, with no ambiguity.
AdayoutinWiesbaden
Coming back to the problem I announced in the first part, I think it would be
nice that our friends go on a small tour of Rüdesheim (Or even Wiesbaden, if
possible). Indeed, they feel quite lonely and isolated in the camp and in Lorch. Some
of them are living there for months and never had the opportunity to visit those cities.
I'm pretty sure they would be interested in visiting the region where they live. It
would also be a bridge between them and German culture and German history.
Furthermore, Rüdesheim and Wiesbaden are beautiful cities that everyone would
love. This trip could be arranged after managing to mix up male and female refugees,
so that no one feels rejected, and everyone may enjoy the outing.
German Austauschpartner?
As I was still in middle-school/high-school, I had a German correspondent
twice. It helped me improving my German skills a lot! And it was also my first step to
discover the culture in depth. This inspired me for our project with the refugees. I
suggest we create a platform to link refugees with German students (from high school
to University) enabling them to communicate through emails, Facebook or Whatsapp.
For example, I could contact local schools/universities and ask them if they would
like to participate in this project. I could create an email address specifically dedicated
to this. The schools would then provide the email address to the students, who will
send emails to introduce themselves. I will find a refugee who could be interested by
this profile, and give him the German's address. Our friend could then make the first
step and email the German student.
It would be a fantastic way for them to discover German culture (facilitating their
integration), improving their language skills, and finally, raise their interest in the
country and overall happiness. I'm sure it would be useful for German students as
well.
We should still discuss whether we choose students from Hessen or whole Germany
(e.g. if we want them to meet after a certain number of emails - which could be nice-;
they have to be in Hessen).
SCI Essay
Do it !
Essay – Do it at Lorch
Submitted by: Cecile Hemery
Matriculation Number: 24132945
Submitted to: Dr. Markus Kreikebaum
Submission Date: 31st of December 2016
SCI Essay – Do it at Lorch 1
Thanks to the SCI project in EBS I have been able to get in touch and actually
contribute to make the life of some refugees in Lorch a bit better. I have always
been into social projects, I started getting engaged in social associations when I
was 15 years old. My first experience ever even though I'm French, was actually
in Germany in a hospice. I was sincerely looking forward this experience with the
refugees. However on my first day I felt pretty shy and quite afraid to ask any
question regarding their past life. I was afraid to hurt them but asking the wrong
question, to make them remember painful memories, or to perturb their moral by
wearing or saying something they would judge inappropriate.
For some obvious reason I was expecting to meet rather some sad persons,
feeling guilty and sad for leaving their home and families, or some angry persons,
full of hate and despair because no one is being able to stop this massacre, angry
against themselves because they can't do anything except running away and
extremely frustrated because of racism they probably have to face every day.
However the people I have met there didn't give me this impression at all. They
were full of life, free spirits playing the brightest smiles to whoever was able to
see it, playful and joyful persons simply enjoying the present. I am not saying that
they weren't sad or angry, that would be insulting them. What I'm saying is that
those people have more courage than anyone. No matter the situation they have
to face in Germany regarding racism and discrimination they would just keep
smiling. They would smile so bright that their tears would barely be visible. In the
same way, they hear about violence and death in their countries every day. Every
single day their home and people are being massacred but they keep laughing,
laughing so hard and loud that we can barely hear them crying. They teach peace,
love and patience to whoever will be willing to listen to them. It was really inspiring
and empowering for me to meet such amazing people.
I loved spending some time with them, playing with them and listening to them.
When I thought that they wouldn't be willing to share any of their stories or past
memories I have been happily surprised. Even though our first meetings were a
bit shy they get used to us quite quickly and after a few meetings they started
sharing their stories and telling us more and more memories and habits they had
back to their country. For some of them it was even a duty.
The most touching stories are the ones of their travel to get to Germany. Many
people say that the refugees in Lorch are the richest of their countries and that
SCI Essay – Do it at Lorch 2
they haven't faced or seen much before coming to Germany. Which is false for
most of them. Even though some families got the opportunity to come all together
to Germany it's sadly not the case for most of them. Many have been separated
during the selection process to get into Germany, some have been left behind,
and some other only managed to get themselves out, hoping for a new life and
the possibility to send money to their families. Refugees in Lorch are indeed lucky
in comparison to most refugees in Europe and to the people who just couldn't
escape. But God only knows what they had to face on the way to here. Most of
them couldn't bring much and had to do all the way to Germany by boat.
Sometimes words were too painful so people with the best drawing skills were
painting the pictures that were stuck in their head. Among all of them, the one
with the best drawing skills is Muhammeid Kheir that many of us named Picasso.
One of his painting got me strongly. On the drawing we could see a small boat
with many men, women and children in it. On one side the boat was chased by
the police forces and on the other one it was attacked by the rebels. This last boat
was very scary, red and full of people with machine guns. The other boat was a
bit less scary and apparently ended up helping them. The boat in the middle was
full of refugees and we could see a few children in their Moms arms. Sadly the
weather was so terrific that they froze to death and when everybody thought the
children were sleeping peacefully, they were actually dead. While telling me the
story of his painting I could clearly see some tears coming up in his eyes but he
was smiling. He really was and at this point I couldn't understand why even
though the reason was pretty obvious. That was their way of fighting, and even
more than that. I felt like if they were not smiling they would just break apart. Even
though their smiles and laughs were so bright, the sadness and pain behind was
just as real as their joy. I think those people know better than anyone how to enjoy
the present, which is probably why they looked so happy and joyful whenever we
came to spend some time with them.
I was honestly enjoying my time with the people coming to us on Wednesday, I
think we managed to build a pretty strong group together. However something
stroke me at a point. It had been almost two months since we started coming to
Lorch every week but we still haven't seen any women. We had a teen joining the
meetings from time to time but as soon as too many men were entering the place
she would just vanish in a second. Literally. Her name was Somayeh and when
SCI Essay – Do it at Lorch 3
our French activities started bringing more people on Wednesdays she would just
stop coming. A few weeks later I met the mother of the four children family. She
came because her husband called her so she could understand what I would say
to her in English and then be able to translate to him. She left the room as soon
as our discussion ended. Then I realized that women seemed to be afraid of
coming in. I met the wife again in the corridor during the party. She was with a
friend of her and stopped to have a cute talk with me. I jumped on the occasion
to invite her to join us at the party saying that we had great food, drinks and music.
They both declined politely saying they already had dinner and that they were
tired. I didn't want to make them feel uncomfortable so I didn't insist much. I met
them a second time in the corridor and let them know that they were still very
welcome to the party, they laugh to see me so happy to invite them and after
declining again finally showed up at the door a few minutes later. I didn't want to
insist more than I already did and stayed a bit further to observe them. They
stayed at the door a few minutes, grabbing each other quite strongly. They were
definitely afraid to go in. I discreetly went to the other French girls around and ask
them to get closer to the entrance so they wouldn't feel so afraid to come in.
Finally one of the husband noticed them and went to them.
After a quick discussion still at the entrance they finally get into the room, the wife
following closely her husband while her friend was literally sticked to her, grabbing
her arm strongly. The two women both served themselves a full plate, they
obviously didn't have diner yet. I tried to be stay and joke won't them as much as
possible to make them feel comfortable and the husband stayed close to them
almost all along. The only time he left was when the women were surrounded by
the children.
As a child of Arabic myself I know more than a bit about the Arabic culture. In
Arabic countries it is cultural to separate men and women. The actual political
and pseudo religious condition in Arabic countries is playing a great part in this
cultural habit but not only. It's a well-known fact that Oriental countries have a
very different vision of women and how their place in society. In addition to this
they have to be apart from men, there are some places they can't go to and most
of the time they have to ask for their husband's permission before going
anywhere. So consequently a women has no place in room full of men no matter
where it is. Whether it's in Germany or in Syria the household's rules are the
SCI Essay – Do it at Lorch 4
same. This is something I want to improve next semester. We won’t be able to
change their mores and beliefs and I think that this is not something we should
do since their cultural heritage is probably all they have left. But we can instore
some special days and time especially for women so they won’t feel neglected or
anything. Maybe later on we could organize an activity mixing both gender but it
would probably take some time.
I have learned a lot this semester and I am certain it will continue this way. I want
all of them to feel welcome and happy in Germany, so I will do my best to help
them and make their life as good and peaceful as I can. I am sincerely looking
forward the next semester, I hope that together we will be able to make greater
things for them.
Essay of service experiences
Thomas Pogoretschnik
Fall Term 2016 SCI Project “Support of refugees in sports clubs” Instructor: Dr. Marcus Kreikebaum
Refugees and integration. Two words, which are very strongly linked with the time we are
living in. Everyday papers write stories about politicians, who are changing the law and
therefore trying to improve the integration of refugees within Germany. But we also hear
stories about terrible terroristic or criminal actions, committed by refugees or the Islamic
state, which is trying to “destroy the western world” by using the willingness of Europe to
receive asylum-seekers. Therefore, people are scared. People are scared because they connect
the headlines in the media with the refugees and generalize them. In Europe, populist parties
like the AFD in Germany receive strong encouragement from scared people, because these
parties promote the fear of the people even more by also generalizing foreigners and refugees
and put them unjustified in bad light.
The SCI project “Support of refugees in sports clubs” as part of our BSc General
Management program dealt with the issue of integration of refugees and what sports clubs can
do to improve this integration. Due to the location of our university, we concentrated on clubs
in the Rheingau area. Our task was to interview several sports clubs via questionnaires to find
out whether and how they recognize the issue of integration of refugees in their clubs.
Furthermore, we were asked to interview refugees directly and personally.
According the political situation in Germany, this topic is very up-to-date and it was very
interesting to see how integration is done. Sport clubs are a very good starting point for
refugees who are willing to integrate into Germany. Within these clubs they can get in touch
with people and get to know the country better. The people of sports clubs are very open-
minded concerning refugees because they know about the discussion on the political stage
and they are proud when they can do their part when it comes to integration.
I got in touch with a refugee from Syria in a sport club and he told me how this sport activity
helps him to organize his life here in Germany. He doesn’t join the club just because of the
sport, he did it because he wants to know more about the country he is living right now and
therefore he had to get in touch with people. He saw no other possibility then sport to do so,
because people are very aware of refugees and not very sociable regarding refugees. Because
he also has no chance to get a job to meet people, he joins the sports club. At the beginning, it
was very hard, because he didn’t spoke the language and was kind of a stranger, but the
passion for sports of him and the people within the club wash all these obstacles away. Due to
his sport activities and the entry into the sports club, he now has the feeling of belonging to
Germany. He is in Germany now for half a year and his language skills concerning his time in
Germany is impressive.
The case of this Syrian refugee is a perfect example of integration. He is willing to know the
country better and do something for it. Nevertheless, there are some refugees who are not
willing or even able to integrate that good because of, for example their religion. I
interviewed another refugee from Afghanistan, who had major problems in his sports club
because of his religion and ethic. His wife, for example was not even able to participate in a
sports club because she must wear a full-body-dress because of her religion but this was not
accepted by the sports club. So, for female it is very hard to integrate just because of their
religion.
This project showed me how controversial und complex these discussions are and how far
from reality they are. During my research, I tried to hold back my prejudice regarding
refugees everybody has or are generated by the media and it was beautiful. It was great to see
people from different cultures doing sports together. They don’t even speak the same
language and nevertheless they understand each other by a nonverbal language. They had fun,
they laugh, they get in touch with each other and it was pure joy. No one cared about the
religion of somebody or where they are coming from. They were just humans doing sport and
having fun.
It was interesting to see, how thankful most of the refugees were to be able to live in Germany
and furthermore be in a sports club. To talk with some refugees and hear their story and what
they made through just to come to Germany and to live a normal life without war and
suppression was very impressive. And even more impressive and interesting was to hear that
the refugees, who are willing to integrate are very angry about those who just come here and
receive money from the state or are trying to do criminal activities. They understand that
Germans are cautious regarding refugees because of what is written in the newspaper but they
hope that they can state an example for good integration and they hope, that they can live
along Germans without fear and prejudices against each other.
EBS Business School
EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht
Aktuelle Flüchtlingspolitik
L-PDV1-005 BSC SCI Do It! I
Name: Matin Sofizada
Semester: Fall Term 2016
Matrikelnummer: 24032255
Betreuer: Dr. Marcus Kreikebaum
Datum: 31.12.2016
Wortanzahl: 2.800
Einleitung
Seit ungefähr zwei Jahren habe ich das Privileg, in verschiedenen lehrreichen Rollen als
Flüchtlingshelfer aktiv zu sein. Zu Beginn beschränkte sich mein Engagement auf die Übersetzung
vom Deutschen ins Persische und umgekehrt, mit der Zeit wandelte es sich jedoch zum Betreuer
und Konfliktmanager. Die letzten beiden „Do it! Projekte“ erlaubten es mir als Teamleiter zusätzlich
im Verbund mit anderen interkulturell kompetenten und engagierten Kollegen Prozesse mit einem
Nachhaltigkeitsanspruch zu gestalten. Mein letztjähriges Essay behandelte die Erweiterung und
Veränderung meiner persönlichen Sichtweise in Bezug auf Flüchtlinge. Nachdem ich die
Flüchtlingskrise aus der Perspektive eines neugierigen Beobachters, ehrenamtlichen
Dolmetschers, Projektleiters und Mitglied der bundesweiten Initiative „Unsere Zukunft. Mit Dir!“
erforschen und die Arbeit von in der gegenwärtigen „Flüchtlingskrise“ involvierten Individuen und
Organisationen aufmerksam auf nahezu allen Ebenen verfolgen konnte, bietet es sich geradezu
an, dass mein diesjähriges Essay eine politische Dimension beinhaltet. Vereinfacht formuliert
begegnen Asylsuchende drei große Herausforderungen. Die erste ist die Fluchtursache, meistens
in Form von Kriegen oder Verfolgungen. Anschließend erfolgt die gefährliche Flucht und
schlussendlich die Integration in einem fremden Land. Nachdem ich mir bereits ein umfassendes
Wissen und Verständnis zum Thema Integration angeeignet habe, beschäftigten mich die übrigen
Phasen zunehmend. Eine gelungene Integration rettet ohne Frage die Zukunft talentierter
Flüchtlinge. Vom ersten Tag an muss durch das Angebot von kurz- und langfristigen Perspektiven,
Deutschkursen und menschlicher Wärme verhindern werden, dass sich ihre Psyche in eine für
alle Beteiligten nicht wünschenswerte Richtung entwickelt. Nun wollte ich ein differenzierteres und
zutreffendes Meinungsbild über die beiden anderen Herausforderungen - Flucht und
Fluchtursachen - entwickeln, die die Asylbewerber betreffen und gar über Leben und Tod
entscheiden, ich jedoch nicht unmittelbar beeinflussen kann. Die politische Führung der
Bundesrepublik Deutschland hingegen schon. In meiner Arbeit werde ich demzufolge meinen
Fokus auf diese beiden Problemfelder und legen und dabei so weit es geht analysieren, wie die
Stellung und tatsächliche Rolle der Bundesregierung hierzu ist. Zum Schluss schildere ich eine
neu gewonnene Erkenntnis, welche politische Maßnahme im Bereich der Integration meiner
Meinung nach notwendig ist.
Hauptteil
Auch dieses Jahr führte ich unzählige Gespräche mit afghanischen Asylbewerbern, die vor
dem Bürgerkrieg geflohen sind. Nahezu alle zeichneten ein düsteres Bild und fielen auf durch die
Hoffnungslosigkeit in Bezug auf die Zukunft ihres Landes. Anlässlich eines Todesfalls in meiner
Familie konnte ich mir im letzten Sommer ein eigenes Bild von der heutigen Situation in
Afghanistan machen. Über ein Land medial informiert und belesen zu sein, gibt eine äußerst grobe
Vorstellung. Die Möglichkeit, sich mit Erstquellen auszutauschen, verleiht eine deutlich genauere
Vorstellung über das jeweilige Land. Die angespannte Situation, die die Asylbewerber täglich und
über Jahre ausgesetzt sind, hautnah mitzuerleben, trägt allerdings zu einem unvergleichlich
besseren Verständnis bei. In einer modernen Gesellschaft ist es unverzichtbar und mittlerweile
eine alte Weisheit, dass wir Menschen erst kennenlernen müssen, bevor wir uns eine feste
Meinung über sie bilden. Selbstverständlich ist es unzumutbar, jedem zu diesem Zweck einen
Besuch in ein Kriegsgebiet nahezulegen. Der Besuch eines Flüchtlingsheims um die Ecke muss
aber zur Selbstverständlichkeit werden, denn sonst fehlt das Wissen über die neuen
Mitmenschen, was wiederum Parteien wie die Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) oder
vergleichbare Gruppen für sich zu nutzen wissen. Meine Erfahrungen in Afghanistan bestätigten
nicht nur die Schilderungen meiner afghanischen Freunde. Sie waren noch extremer als ich es
mir ohnehin vorstellte und dies trotz der Tatsache, dass ich selbst afghanischer Staatsbürger bin
und unzählige Gespräche mit Betroffenen führte. Mein Blick auf Kriege hat sich hierbei nochmals
verändert, sodass meine Gefühle und Gedanken in Gesprächen mit Syrern, Afghanen oder
anderen Kriegsflüchtlingen nicht mehr dieselben sind wie vor meinem Afghanistan-Aufenthalt.
Nichtsdestotrotz habe ich die Folgen des Krieges nicht am eigenen Leib miterlebt und kann nur
spekulieren, welche seelischen Narben es mit sich bringt, im Krieg zu leben.
Afghanistan ist mit circa 120.000 Asylbewerbern in Deutschland im Jahr 2016 nach Syrien
an der Spitze der Herkunftsländer steht (BMI, 2016). Nach einer Vereinbarung zwischen der EU
und Afghanistan sollen in naher Zukunft mindestens 80.000 Afghanen abgeschoben werden
(Agence France-Presse, 2016). Im Dezember 2016 hat es hierzulande bereits die erste
öffentlichkeitswirksame Sammel-Abschiebung nach Kabul gegeben. „Sichere Zonen“ werden von
der Bundesregierung wie folgt definiert: „Wenn in einer Region das Verhältnis von zivilen Opfern
zur Gesamtbevölkerung geringer als 1:800 ist, gilt das Risiko für Leib und Leben als zu niedrig,
um allein deshalb Schutz in Deutschland zu erhalten.“ (Hammerstein, Hoffmann, Koelbl &
Wiedmann-Schmidt, 2016). Die Daten, die dafür herangezogen werden, sind intransparent und
umfassen teilweise anonyme Quellen. Des Weiteren erfolgt eine Betrachtung auf Provinzebene,
während es starke Abweichungen zwischen einzelnen Distrikten gibt. Damit eignen sich die
Informationen nicht, um in irgendeiner Form eine Differenzierung zwischen „sicheren“ und
„unsicheren Gebieten“ vorzunehmen, dennoch stellt die Bundesregierung auf dieser Grundlage
fest, „dass die Sicherheitslage in Afghanistan in einigen Regionen eine Rückkehr
ausreisepflichtiger afghanischer Staatsangehöriger grundsätzlich erlaubt.“ (IMK, 2016)
In Vergleich zu den ersten Einsatzjahren der ISAF-Truppen und meinem Besuch im Jahr
2003, in der immerhin die Präsenz von 40 Nationen für den „Krieg gegen den Terror“ vonnöten
waren, ist die Anzahl von Terroranschlägen erheblich gestiegen. So entwickelte sich ein
Selbstmordattentat in der Hauptstadt Kabul von einem dramatischen Ereignis zur einer täglichen
Normalität. Der Rückzug der ISAF trägt zusätzlich zu einer Zuspitzung der Sicherheitslage bei, da
dadurch die afghanischen Sicherheitskräfte größtenteils auf sich alleine gestellt sind. Zwar haben
im Zeitraum von 2001 bis 2014 durchaus auch Verbesserungen stattgefunden, wie im Bereich der
weiblichen Emanzipation, jedoch ist die NATO-Mission gemessen an den proklamierten Zielen,
insbesondere auch an den immensen menschlichen und materiellen Kosten, zweifellos
gescheitert. Angesichts der weiteren Destabilisierung im Laufe des Einsatzes wurde das primäre
Vorhaben, eine Stabilisierung der Gesamtlage zu erwirken, weit verfehlt. Gerade in dieser
Tiefphase die Gefahrenlage für die Zivilbevölkerung in Frage zu stellen, ist in hohem Maße
widersprüchlich. Das Verhalten der Bundesregierung zeigt auf, dass es ihr hauptsächlich um eine
Reduktion der Asylbewerber und Geduldeten geht und es sich nicht lediglich um eine
gerechtfertigte Korrektur handelt. Die Bezeichnung „sichere Zonen“ ist irreführend, da sie nicht
dem westlichen Verständnis vom Sicherheitsbegriff entsprechen kann, auch dann, wenn die von
der Bundesregierung ausformulierten Kriterien zweifellos erfüllt wären. Wie sehr dies speziell auf
Deutschland zutrifft, zeigt sich unter anderem daran, dass in Deutschland bereits ein tragisches
Vorkommnis für die landesweite Verbreitung eines Unsicherheitsgefühls ausreicht und das
Erreichen von Rekordwerten für Selbstverteidigungskurse und Pfefferspray (Kock, 2016). Dies
ungeachtet der Tatsache, dass Zuwanderer statistisch gesehen nicht krimineller sind als
Deutsche, wie es das Bundeskriminalamt in Vergangenheit mehrmals betont hat (Pinkert &
Strozyk, 2016; DPA, 2016) In meinem diesjährigen Aufenthalt befand ich mich die meiste Zeit in
Kabul, einer als „sichere Zone“ deklarierten Provinz. Dort finden ein bis drei organisierte
Terroranschläge pro Tag statt. Mit dem Begriff „sicher“ suggeriert die Bundesregierung der
Öffentlichkeit bewusst ein realitätsverzerrtes Bild. Das Wort „Sicherheit“ beschreibt laut dem
Duden den Zustand des Sicherseins, Geschütztseins vor Gefahr oder Schaden und das
höchstmögliche Freisein von Gefährdungen. Genauso oder so ähnlich wird dieser Begriff
normalerweise interpretiert. Die zutreffendere Bezeichnung „unsichere Zone, die den
Schutzanforderungen nicht entspricht“ könnte jedoch nicht zum Zwecke der eindämmenden
Asylpolitik instrumentalisiert werden. Die Simplifizierung des Problems und das Nichteingehen auf
Details seitens der Großen Koalition ist nur deswegen durchsetzbar, weil die Wahlbevölkerung
schwerlich in der Lage ist, die Zustände eines solch fernliegenden Landes im Gegensatz zu den
des eigenen Landes akkurat einzuschätzen. Genau für solche komplexen Fragen, die das
einfache Volk nicht durchleuchten kann, werden machtvolle Parlamente und Regierungen
eingesetzt und auf die permanente Durchführung von Volksentscheiden verzichtet. Damit diese
abgeschwächte Form der Demokratie ihre Legitimität beibehält, müssen die Regierenden immer
wieder aufs Neue beweisen, dass sie ihre Aufgaben verantwortungsvoll und mit höchsten
moralischen Maßstäben ausführen. Insbesondere da es sich hier weder um gewöhnliche
alltagspolitische Fragestellungen noch um drohende Firmenbankrotts oder steigende Strompreise
dreht, sondern um die Sicherheit von zehntausenden hilfesuchenden Menschen, erreichen
politische Handlungen eine lange Zeit nicht dagewesene Brisanz und eine neue Dimension der
Verantwortung. Menschen in Regionen abzuschieben, in denen sie nachweislich einer großen
Gefahr für Leib und Leben ausgesetzt sind und zugleich zu behaupten, diese Regionen seien
„sicher“, wird dieser sowohl politischen als auch moralischen Verantwortung nicht gerecht. In
dieser Zeit und in dieser Frage dürfen Debatten darüber, unter welchen exakten Umständen
Menschen eine Abschiebung zugemutet werden dürfen, angesichts der schwachen Opposition
auch von Repräsentanten der Großen Koalition nicht gescheut werden. Während in den
vergangenen Monaten über das Schicksal der Afghanen entschieden und entsprechende
Maßnahmen eingeleitet wurden, stritt man innerhalb der Union, der Großen Koalition und in der
gesamten Bundesrepublik darüber, ob eine Vollverschleierung erlaubt oder verboten sein soll.
Dabei ist selbst der Bundesregierung nicht bekannt, wie viele Burka-Trägerinnen in Deutschland
leben. Es ist jedoch davon auszugehen, dass es sich um eine extrem geringe Zahl handelt. Von
allen Seiten muss erkannt werden, dass Symboldebatten wesentliche Debatten, welche über
Leben und Tod entscheiden, verdrängen. In Anbetracht dieser negativen Entwicklung, die einen
Tiefpunkt erreicht hat, ist es von Bedeutung, dass die junge Generation dies zum entscheidenden
Anlass nimmt sich politisch zu engagieren, um eine Wende herbeizuführen, und sich nicht im
Gegenteil von der Politik abzuwenden.
Im Jahr 2016 sind 5.000 Menschen auf dem Weg nach Europa im Mittelmeer ertrunken
(DPA, 2016). Unabhängig davon, ob sie vor Krieg, einem autoritären Regime oder Armut fliehen,
vereint die Menschen die Absicht einen Antrag auf Asyl im Zielland einzureichen. Die illegale
Flucht ist für den Großteil der Flüchtlinge die einzige Alternative, da es nicht im Interesse der
Europäischen Union ist, legale Wege zu schaffen, sondern diese möglichst zu begrenzen.
Vereinbarungen mit der Türkei und Erklärungen von extrem unsicheren Ländern wie Afghanistan
zu de facto sicheren Herkunftsländern, sind menschenunwürdige Handlungen, die eine möglichst
vollkommene Regulierung des Andrangs der Flüchtlinge bezwecken. Weder würde die deutsche
Wahlbevölkerung einen massiven Zustrom dulden, der entstünde, wenn in der deutschen
Botschaft des jeweiligen Herkunftslandes Asyl beantragen werden könnte, noch wäre es für sie
akzeptabel, die Türen für Immigranten grundsätzlich zu schließen. Um einem politischen
Selbstmord zu entkommen, ist es daher unumgänglich für die Bundesregierung, bis zu einem
gewissen Grad Kontrolle über die Situation zu erlangen.
Die „Flüchtlingskrise“ führte bisher weder zu Steuererhöhungen noch zu anderen
materiellen Benachteiligungen deutscher Bürger. Doch selbst wenn eine von vielen gefürchtete
großzügigere und offenere Flüchtlingspolitik eine Verschiebung der Budgetverteilung unserer
Bundesregierung zur Folge hätte, so hilft folgender Vergleich, um die Skepsis über ein solches
Szenario zu entkräften: Verzichtet man nur auf den Bau von einem der unzähligen öffentlichen
Luxusgüter, wie bspw. eine teure und umstrittene Fußgängerbrücke, ermöglicht das die Sicherung
der Existenz und Integration von über hundert Flüchtlingen über einen längeren Zeitraum. Die
Debatte ist jedoch so emotionalisiert und entrationalisiert, dass beim Otto-Normal-Bürger der
gegenteilige Eindruck erweckt wird, man tausche die Zukunft eines Deutschen gegen die eines
Einwanderers aus. Vielmehr: Deutschlands Kultur, Sicherheit und gar Fortbestand stehe auf dem
Spiel. Die entscheidende, wenn auch selten gestellte Frage entspringt keiner symbolpolitischen
Debatte und heißt nicht „Braucht Deutschland eine Obergrenze?“. Sie lautet auch nicht, wie ich
es anfangs formuliert hätte, „Wie viel ist uns Deutschen der Wohlstand wert?“. Deutschlands
Wohlstand steht nicht auf dem Spiel, selbst wenn Medien, Politiker und das von Gefühl geleitete
Wesen in uns diesen Eindruck vermitteln mag. Die Frage ist eher: „Wie viel ist uns zu viel
Wohlstand wert?“ Deutschland ist eines der reichsten Länder der Welt und hat sich durch ihre
Geschichte zu einem empathischen und moralbewussten Volk entwickelt. Dem Bürger muss klar
sein, dass das Massensterben im Mittelmeer von Volksvertretern und Regierung zwar nicht
gewollt, jedoch bewusst in Kauf genommen wird und ein verheerende Ergebnis ihrer Politik ist.
Aufgabe der Politik und Medien muss es nun sein, den Mut aufzubringen, um anstelle von
Scheindebatten die richtigen, das heißt konstruktiven und wirkungsvollen Debatten zu führen.
Sollte es den Gewalten einschließlich der Medien gelingen, den Deutschen die wahren und
entscheidenden Fragen zu vergegenwärtigen, brächten diese daraufhin mit Sicherheit genügend
Sensibilität auf, um die Annahme moralisch hochwertiger Positionen im Kampf gegen die
humanitären Katastrophen für die Politiker lohnenswert erscheinen zu lassen. Da der Mensch das
egoistische Wesen in sich selbstverständlich nicht gänzlich überwinden kann, kann es auch keine
moralisch bedenkenlosen und unumstrittenen Lösungsansätze geben, die zugleich ohne
unüberwindbaren Widerstand umsetzbar wären. Im Idealfall führe jedoch ein gesteigertes
Vertrauen zum Gerechtigkeitssinn der deutschen Bürger, eine Wiederkehr des Mutes der Politiker
und eine Rückbesinnung der Meinungsträger auf Fakten dazu, dass die Stimmung nicht gegen
die wahren Opfer gerichtet ist, sondern allemal gegen unsere Tatenlosigkeit in der Vergangenheit.
Flüchtlingen Hilfe zu leisten, sich mit ihnen auszutauschen, von ihnen und über sie zu
lernen - auf diese Erfahrung möchte ich nicht verzichten. Es haben sich bei mir einige
Projektmitglieder gemeldet, die anfangs ihre Skepsis gegenüber Flüchtlingen geäußert haben und
mir heute bestätigen können, dass sie ein komplett anderes Bild von Flüchtlingen haben als zuvor
und das wahrscheinlich niemals möglich geworden wäre, wenn sie nicht am Projekt teilgenommen
hätten. Erst durch das Begegnen und die Arbeit mit Flüchtlingen hat sich das gewendet. Ohne
diesen Kontakt kann jeder, ganz gleich ob es sich um einen hochgebildeten Akadamiker oder ein
ungebildetes Kind handelt, einem Irrtum unterliegen. Diese Erkenntnis lässt sich auf das Ansehen
von Behinderten oder alten Menschen übertragen. Jeder sollte intensiven Kontakt mit mindestens
einem dieser Bevölkerungsschichten, besser jedoch mit allen drei, aufgenommen haben, der über
das oberflächliche Kennenlernen hinausgeht. Bestenfalls sollte dies vor dem Studium erfolgen.
Service Learning, wie es vollzogen haben, sollte meiner Meinung nach verpflichten in Schulen
werden, um ein neues und realitätsnahes Bewusstsein zu schaffen und zu fördern. Vorurteile und
Pauschalisierung würden in Zukunft abnehmen und nicht mehr Grundlage von politischen
Haltungen werden können. Das gleiche gälte für Flüchtlinge, die dadurch ausnahmslos mit einer
Vielzahl von Einheimischen in Kontakt kämen. Eine starke Beschleunigung der Integration wäre
die Folge. Zu guter Letzt wäre das eine enorme Entlastung für Flüchtlingsheime, Altersheime und
viele mehr. In 9 bis 12 Jahren Schulzeit sollte hierfür Platz sein. Da die Schulpolitik
bedauerlicherweise Ländersache, richtet sich mein Appell nicht an die Bundesregierung, sondern
an die jeweiligen Landesregierungen und die Kultusministerkonferenz.
Schluss
Die Politik begegnet ohne Frage eine anspruchsvolle Ausnahmesituation. Welche
Handlungen Deutschland für sich ableitet, sollte davon abhängen, in welcher Position sie sich
befindet. Wie mächtig ist das Land? Wie reich ist das Land? Und vor allem: Wie lässt sich eine
Politik vermitteln, die sowohl im Sinne der Hilfesuchenden als auch im Sinne der Bevölkerung ist?
Was auf den ersten Blick unmöglich erscheinen mag, ist nicht so abwegig. Sind die deutschen
Bürger ausreichend informiert und aufgeklärt, so gäbe es keinen Widerspruch zwischen einer
Politik für Flüchtlinge und einer Politik der Bürger. Die Politik muss das als ihre Aufgabe verstehen
und größere Anstrengungen in diese Richtung unternehmen. Welche Menschen in unser Land
Obhut finden dürfen, sollte eine juristische und moralische, keine rein politische Frage sein. Die
Forderung der CSU nach der Einführung einer Obergrenze ist ein Schachzug, der Horst Seehofer
auch bei einer Nichtberücksichtigung auf bayerischer Landesebene nützt. Sie ist offensichtlich
verfassungswidrig und stellt für die Bundesregierung keine Option dar. Wohl nicht
verfassungswidrig, wobei auch dem Bundesverfassungsgericht diesbezüglich
Verfassungsbeschwerden vorliegen, ist die Politik der Bundesregierung, die durch geschickte
Schachzüge über andere Wege die Zahl der Flüchtlinge eindämmen will. Statt die Bemühungen
auf die Bekämpfung der Flüchtlingsursachen, eine Neuorientierung der Rüstungspolitik und das
Allgemeinwohl der Flüchtlinge zu konzentrieren, ist sie bereit, fragwürdige Maßnahmen zu
ergreifen, die kurzfristig wirken und Flüchtlinge gefährden.
Es kann beobachtet werden, dass es eine Vielzahl von Journalisten immer weniger um Wahrheit
und Fakten geht, dass Politiker zunehmend mit Kalkül handeln und dass Menschen von Tag zu
Tag ihr Interesse für Politik und Gesellschaft verlieren. All diese Faktoren erklären eine Politik
gegen Menschen, die nach Hilfe rufen und normalerweise auch gegen eine bestens informierte
Wahlbevölkerung, die aufgrund der Komplexität in der Praxis nicht zu finden ist. Was wir
außerhalb der Politik unternehmen können, ist das Bewusstsein der Menschen zu verändern, sie
mit der Wahrheit zu konfrontieren und so auch politische Positionen der großen Parteien insofern
zu beeinflussen, als diese sich näher an die Fakten und die Nöte von Bedürftigen richten.
Innerhalb der Politik ist mehr talentierter Nachwuchs gefordert. Diese sollten multikulturelle
Erfahrungen gesammelt haben und sich gesellschaftlich, nicht nur parteipolitisch, engagiert
haben. Merken die Medien, dass große Gefühle keine Verkaufsschlager mehr sind, werden diese
sich automatisch wieder mehr der kompromisslosen Suche nach der Wahrheit widmen.
Referenzliste Bundesministerium des Innern (15. Dezember 2016). Rückführung nach Afghanistan. Abgerufen am 17. Dezember 2016, von http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2016/12/erste- rueckfuehrung-nach-afghanistan.html Agence France-Presse (3. Oktober 2016). EU: Zehntausend Flüchtlinge sollen abgeschoben werden. Tagesspiegel. Abgerufen am 26. Dezember, von http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/fluechtlinge-eu-zehntausende-afghanen-sollen- abgeschoben-werden/14637442.html Von Hammerstein, K., Hoffmann, C., Koelbl, S. & Wiedmann-Schmidt, W. (September 2016). Berlin will verstärkt afghanische Migranten abschieben. Spiegel Online. Abgerufen am 26. Dezember 2016, von https://magazin.spiegel.de/SP/2016/9/143351309/index.html
Ständige Konferenz der Innenminister und -senatoren der Länder (7. Dezember 2015). Sammlung der zur Veröffentlichung freigegebenen Beschlüsse der 203. Sitzung der Ständigen Konferenz der Innenminister und -senatoren der Länder. Website der Innenministerkonferenz. Abgerufen am 27. Dezember 2016, von http://www.innenministerkonferenz.de/IMK/DE/termine/to-beschluesse/2015-12- 03_04/beschluesse.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
Kock, F. (30. Dezember 2016). Die Angst hat sich verändert. Sueddeutsche Zeitung. Abgerufen am 30. Dezember 2016, von http://www.sueddeutsche.de/leben/sicherheitsgefuehl-in- deutschland-die-angst-hat-sich-veraendert-1.3307484 Pinkert, R. & Strozyk, S. (30. Dezember 2016). BKA-Bericht: Flüchtlinge begehen weniger Straftaten. Abgerufen am 30. Dezember 2016. von http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/fluechtlinge-bka-bericht-fluechtlinge-begehen- weniger-straftaten-1.3315641 Deutsche Presse-Agentur (8. Juni 2016). Zuwanderer sind nicht krimineller als Deutsche. Abgerufen am 26. Dezember 2016, von http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2016- 06/bundeskriminalamt-statistik- straftaten-asylbewerber Deutsche Presse-Agentur (23. Dezember 2016). Zahl der Ertrunkenen auf Rekordstand. Spiegel Online. Abgerufen am 25. Dezember 2016, von http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/fluechtlinge-im-mittelmeer-zahl-der-ertrunkenen-migranten-auf-rekordstand-a-1127373.html
SCIDoIt!–DoItatLorch
IndividualEssayandLearningJournal
Underthesupervisionof:Mr.Kreikebaum
Françoisd’Adhémar(24132912)Submittedon:27thDecember2016
Refugeesindividualessay
3
I–IndividualEssay
1)Introduction
Thissemester,whileattendingtoanothersemesterasadualdegree
studentatEBS,wehadtheopportunitytodosomeworkandgivetimesto
differentcausesandwork.Amongthevariousprojects,Idecidedtojointheone
involvingtherefugeesafterhearingandreadingabouttherefugeessituationon
thenewsforagoodpartof2015and2016.Aseveryoneknows,refugeesare
moreandmoreseekingasyluminEurope:Fortheyear2015,Europehasgiven
asylumto333350refugees,whichisahugeincreasecompareto2014(+72%)1.
Francenewspapersoftenusetheterm“crisis”ontheirheadlinesregardingthis
situation.ThisiswhyIjoinedthisprojectasIwantedtobeincontactwiththem,
tobeabletogettoknowthemalittlemore,makemyownopinion,understand
theirpositionandhelpifIcould.Becauseofallthearticleswecouldseefora
whilenow,themainconcernsthatwerepinpointedwerethefactthatEurope
neverhostedthatmuchrefugeesatonce,thattheywouldcomealoneandendup
withtheirallfamily,whilestealingourjobs.Theseexaggeratedstereotypesseem
tohavespreadandbethebaseofmanyconversationsandbeliefspeopleshareto
oneanother.Also,asIhavebeentravelingquitealot:havinglivedfor10months
inEnglandlastyearandbeingFrenchaswell,Ifeltlikethoseideasarecommonly
sharedataEuropeanlevelandnotonlyinFrance.
However,whileparticipatingtothishumanexperience,Iwaspositivelysurprise
bethebehaviourandtalkswecouldhavewithoneanother.Forallofthose
reasonsandbasedonmyownexperience,Iwantedtoworkonthemain
stereotypesthatwetendtohaveontherefugeeswhileexpressingmyapproach
regardingthem.
1http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7233417/3-20042016-AP-EN.pdf/34c4f5af-eb93-4ecd-984c-577a5271c8c5:EU Member States granted protection to more than 330 000 asylum seekers in 2015
Refugeesindividualessay
4
2)Refugeesasylum:acomplexandoftenmiscomprehendedsituationAspreviouslymentioned,themedia,oftencalledthefourthpower,gaveus
plentydocumentaries,articles,specialeditionsontherefugeessituationformorethana
yearnow,andwhileexposingthefactthat333350asylumseekersreceivedprotection
statusfromtheEuropeanUnion,andthatover1millionmigrantsarrivedinEuropein
2015aswell,somestereotypesandcommonbelievesrapidlyspreadamongussuchas:
- Franceneverhadasmuchmigrantsandforeignersasnow.->Thisisnotentirely
true,in1982Francehad4millionimmigrantsand3,5foreignersinitsterritory,
foratotalpopulationof55millionoftotalpopulation.Almost30yearslaterin
2011,itwas5,4millionimmigrantsand3,7millionofforeignerslivinginFrance
foratotalpopulationof65million.Lookingatpercentage,itgivesus+1,2%of
immigrantsbutadecreaseof-0,5%offoreigners2.
2http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2014/08/06/sept-idees-recues-sur-l-immigration-et-les-immigres_4467506_4355770.html
Refugeesindividualessay
5
- Anotherstrongclichéisthattherefugeesaretakingourjobs.->False,usually,
refugeesfirstneedtolearnthelanguageofthecountrythatishostingthem,
sometimesaswelltheyaretakingthejobthatpeoplefromthehostcountrydo
notwantanymoreandfinally,before“stealing”jobstheyalsocreatemoreof
thembybeingatfirstnewconsumersinthemarketthatcanincreasesales,
marketsizeandpotentiallygenerategrowthofbusinesswithnewopportunities
andnewjobs.Furthermore,applyingforajobisalsocomplicatedinsomecases.
Forinstance,inGermany,asweweretalkingwiththepeopleatLorch,andby
helpingthemfindingemployment,welearnedthatpriorapplyingtoanyjobs,
theyneededtogothroughthe“jobcentre”andthenthejobcentrewouldhavejob
offersbutwillalsobetheorganizationinchargeofthecontractbetweenthe
companyandtherefugee.Thejobcentreisalsotheonecollectingthesalarybut
theyarealsocoveringthecostsofhousingfortherefugees.
- RefugeesthatarriveinEuropearenotwelleducated->False,fromexperience
andbygoingtoLorchonceaweekforthepastsemester,Ihavemetgreatpeople
that,bytheirdifferentbackground,culture,religion,hadalottoofferandwe
couldenjoytheircompanyandsomeplayedusguitarwhilesinging,otherswould
makeusniceartdrawingsandbakingusgoodfood,evenifhewaspreviously
workinginabank;otherswoulddousmagictricks,andwealsoencountered
students,Englishteacher,thingsEuropeanstudentslikeuscouldnoteven
replicateifwetriedoverandover,etc….Thoseexamplearejustamongthe
refugeeswewereseeingandtheyhadalottoofferandtheirvariousskillsareI
believearealbenefitstous;assomepeopleseethemonlytakingthingsfromus,
theydonotrealizethattheyactuallyhavealottoofferinreturn,newlanguage
forexampleandalltheotherthingsImentionedabove.
- EuropeishostingthemiseryofEarth->False,inordertoarriveintoEurope,the
refugeeshastogothroughalong,dangerousandhazardoustravelwherethey
actuallyneedalotofmoneytobeabletoarrivesafelyintoEuropeandtobeable
topaytheexpensiveboatsandothertransportationmeanstoescapeandleave
Refugeesindividualessay
6
theirhomecountry.Thepeoplewithoutanymoneyareunfortunatelynotableto
paythetraveltoothercountryandstaywheretheyare.Thispartiallyexplains
whymostoftherefugeesandmigrantsinEuropeareeducatedand
knowledgeable.
- Refugeesareexpensiveforthepublicfinances->False,andtheycaneven
contributetowelfare.Indeed,bycomingtoacountry,andtakingtheexampleof
Belgium,refugeesactuallycangiveabenefitof3500€perpersonduetotaxes,
consumptionetc…Itisevenexpectedthatrefugeeswillcontributetoagrowthof
0,1%oftheeconomicgrowthinBelgium3.Onceagainthiscouldbeexplainbythe
presenceandconsumptionoftherefugeesbutitisalsoaboutallthejobcreated
aroundhostingthemsuchasdirectjobtohostthem,borderscontrolandsafety,
andalsotheEUactuallyprovidesfundstoitsmemberstodealwiththerefugees
crisis,theyallocated€10billionforthismatterforboth2015and20164.So
regardingthestereotypesofrefugeescostingusagreatdealofmoney,them
stealingourjobs,wecanactuallyseethatitisnotthecaseastheyalsogenerate
creationofjobinothersectorandastheyarenowlivingintheirhostcountry,
theyconsumeandactastherestofus.
3)ConclusionWiththeconflictshappeningintheMiddle-Eastandtheexponentialgrowth
ofmigrantsarrivinginEuropelastyear,therefugeescrisistookanotherlevelandled
theEuropeansconfusedregardingthistopic.Fearoftheunknown,fearofsecurity,job-
securityalsohelpedthestereotypesregardingtherefugeesthatareusuallynot
favourabletothem.BasedonmyexperienceatLorchandthefactsIcouldfindandeven
hear,Icangladlysaythatmostofthepessimiststereotypesagainstrefugeesarewrong.
Indeed,someofusmusthaveheardandassumethattheybringnothingand,even
worse,theyjustcametotakefromus.Asdemonstratedinthisessay,Iwasabletofind
3https://www.amnesty.be/decouvrir-nos-campagnes/migrants-et-refugies/10-prejuges-sur-les-migrants/prejuges#nb33-94http://publications.europa.eu/webpub/com/factsheets/refugee-crisis/en/
Refugeesindividualessay
7
thatmostofthesestereotypeswerewrongintermsofeconomicreasons:hostingthem
actuallycreatejobsbutmainly,Ithinkweshouldalwayskeepinmindthattheyare
humanbeingsandassuch,theyhavelotofthingstooffer:thediversityofourculturesis
beneficialaswecanteacheachothernewthings(languages,knowledge),wecanspend
greattimetogetherasIhadtheopportunitytodoitwiththeotherstudentofEBS.Last
yearinEngland,Iwasdoinganinternshipforanautomotivesupplierand,whileoff
loadingoneofourtrucksarrivingfromFrance,sevenrefugeesjumpedofthetruckand
ranonthestreet,andtheyhaddamagedtheproductbyopeningtheboxes,potentially
lookingforfood.Thisfirstencounter,frommycorporateperspectivewasnotverygood
Ihavetosay,butaseveryoneisdifferentandafterlearningtoknowthembetterand
actuallyspendingsomequalitytimewiththem,Icanconcludethisworkbysayingthat
frommyperspective,refugeesareasourceofwealthbothhumanandforthe
pessimistic,financialaswell.
Refugeesindividualessay
8
4)Bibliography(2016)10préjugéssurlesmigrants,AmnestyInternational[online]
https://www.amnesty.be/decouvrir-nos-campagnes/migrants-et-refugies/10-prejuges-
sur-les-migrants/prejuges#nb33-9(accessed22/12/2016)
Eurostat(2016),EUMemberStatesgrantedprotectiontomorethan330000asylumseekersin2015,Eurostatpressrelease[online]http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7233417/3-20042016-AP-EN.pdf/34c4f5af-eb93-4ecd-984c-577a5271c8c5(accessed21/12/2016)EuropeanCommission(2016),TheEUandtherefugeecrisis,Europeancommission[online]http://publications.europa.eu/webpub/com/factsheets/refugee-crisis/en/(accessed22/12/2016)Laurent,S.(2014),7idéesrecuessurl’immigrationetlesimmigrésenFrance,LeMonde[online] http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2014/08/06/sept-idees-recues-sur-l-immigration-et-les-immigres_4467506_4355770.html(accessed21/12/2016)
EBS Business School
EBS Universität fur Wirtschaft und Recht
SCI Educare essay
Individual Assignment
What is the situation of migrants in France?
How to fight populism?
Names: Victorien Chantreau, Charlotte Cornu
Matriculation numbers: 23132002, 23131985
2
Table of Content
Introduction: ............................................................................................................................ 3
I. The situation of migrants in France ............................................................................. 3 1. Migrant's origins: ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. France compared to Europe .................................................................................................... 4 3. 2017 campaign ............................................................................................................................ 5 4. Putting migrants & homeless persons face to face ......................................................... 6 5. Calais ............................................................................................................................................... 7
II. The rise of Nationalism in Europe: ............................................................................. 8 1. Example of France: ..................................................................................................................... 8 2. What can be done against Nationalism?.................................................................................. 9
Conclusion: ............................................................................................................................ 10
Bibliography: ........................................................................................................................ 11
3
Introduction:
The trip from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq or else to France will not be studied here.
The emphasis will be placed on the situation of migrants after their arrival and their living
conditions. In a second part, the rise of populism will be discussed.
It is very difficult to remain neutral and objective while talking about such an
important and controversial topic. Thus, every time it is possible, the political orientation
of every source will be added in the footnotes. Then, one can create his/her own opinion
about the information given.
Let's make it clear that it is very difficult to count the number of migrants in
France, as a lot of them are (still) in irregular situation. Moreover, any kind of ethnical
statistics is forbidden in the country, which avoids "side-counting" or "side-analysis".
I. The situation of migrants in France
1. Migrant's origins:
The "country of human rights" always provided asylum to a certain number of
migrants from every part of the world. (2014: Iraq, Afghanistan not in the top 10)
Country 2014 Country 2015
Democratic rep. Congo 3782 Soudan 5091
China 2497 Syria 3403
Bangladesh 2425 Kosovo 3139
Russia 2138 Bangladesh 3071
Syria 2072 Haiti 3049
Pakistan 2047 Democratic rep. Congo 2937
Albania 1944 China 2814
Soudan 1793 Albania 2245
Haiti 1730 Iraq 2145
Guinea 1612 Afghanistan 2122
4
This table from the ministry of interior shows an important change in the origin
of migrants, indicator of major socio-politic changes in the world. The change is
particularly visible for Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, the three main nationalities for Europe
according to Eurostat (more than 50% of the total). Also, the number of Syrians doubled,
the number of Afghans increased fourth fold and the number or Iraqi has been multiplied
by seven! They follow -respectively- the persecution of the Kurdish minority by ISIS, the
non-ending civilian war in Afghanistan (worse since the withdrawal of UN forces in
2013-2014), and Sunni-Shiite wars in Iraq, added with ISIS exactions.
2. France compared to Europe
Despite some wrong information passed by far-right politicians and newspapers1,
France has a rather low rate of asylum enquirer compared to its European neighbors
(1.063 per each million inhabitants). In absolute value, this number comes to 70.500
(5,6% of the total number of refugees in Europe, whereas its population is 13% of
Europe's!). The country also has one of the lowest evolution between 2014 and 2015:
only 20% compared to an average 123% in whole Europe.
Number of Asylum enquirers/one million inhabitants (2015)2
1 See part 2 of this paper 2 Source: EUROSTAT; absolutely neutral source: the institution only focuses on figures
without giving any interpretation.
5
By the way, the figures are not tremendously high compared to French history3
(There were already a few peaks related to other historical events). The point here is not
to say that there is no migration crisis, and that no particular action should be taken by
governments to help migrants. The point here is to prove that there is no "invasion", as
we sometimes see in medias. Despite this optimistic statement, the record has been broken
last year and will probably keep increasing.
Demands (blue) and acceptations (yellow) of asylum in France since 1973
3. 2017 campaign
2017 happens to be an important year for politics, as instance for France and
Germany. Consequently, the "migrants" question is at the center of the debate. Politicians,
medias and citizens tend to mix terrorist attacks (ISIS), migrants and even Islam all
together, on purpose or unconsciously.
In September 2015, Robert Ménard, the mayor of a mid-size French city changed
an AFP4 picture to scare the inhabitants of Béziers, his town. By adding posters on the
3 Source: OPFRA Ministry of the interior's own statistics; online 4 French Press Agency
6
picture, he was suggesting that lots of migrants are about to come (yellow title: "They are
coming!"). The second poster on the train says "Free school, free housing and income for
all of them!"). He was definitely not afraid of changing the truth to play on people's fear.
4. Putting migrants & homeless persons face to face
One political strategy is to compare the advantages refugees have to the homeless
person's or even to French citizens in general. The important question here is whether it
is morally possible to hierarchize misery? Are French homeless more important than
foreign migrants? Or maybe the opposite? There shouldn't be an answer because this
question shouldn't be.
This strategy5 from far-right politicians points out the fact that some migrants are hosted
in hotels or abandoned castles whereas there are still homeless people living in the streets.
The truth is, a French citizen may have access to a specific housing program, plus social
housing. Finally: emergency housing, to which migrants also have access. In general,
migrants are accommodated with very delicate "housing" such as tents and camps (e.g.
Calais).
5 Le Monde, rather at the left of the political spectrum,
Bezier's magazine
after photoshopping
Original picture from AFP
taken in Macedonia
7
5. Calais
Calais is a city in the North of France, the closest point to Great Britain and also
the starting point of the Eurotunnel. Between 6.000 and 8.000 migrants were living there
when the camp has been demolished (October 2016). Their objective was to reach Dover
(England) hiding in trucks or via the port. A security problem for which 1.900 policemen
were involved6. The concerned migrants are now being dispatched to various regions of
France in CAO (Orientation and Welcoming Center).
The living conditions in this camp are "[disgraceful and not respectful of human
rights]"7 according to Jacques Toubon, a human right's defender. People live in very small
houses made of found materials, and public health risk is high. The demolishment of some
part of the camp earlier made the living conditions in the remaining areas even worse. To
aggravate the situation, some police violence has been revealed several times through
videos. Some are still being judged at the moment.
6 L'Express, rather at the right of the political spectrum 7 La Voix du Nord (local newspaper)
Calais
8
II. The rise of Nationalism in Europe:
1. Example of France:
For several years, the political party FN (Front National) has gained more and
more power in the French population. The reasons to that are multiple. First, the
representative of the party has changed. Jean-Marie Le Pen left his place to his daughter,
Marine Le Pen, younger and closer to the population. Moreover, she learned from the
misbehaviour of his father and she developed a softer speech that conveys the same idea
as before, but in a more socially correct way. It is been many years that FN win slowly
part in the political game in France, but since the Arab Spring, more and more citizen
start to see in Marine Le Pen a possibility to bring change and to exit from the endless
fight between the republicans (ex-UMP party) and the democrats (PS party). Indeed, a
large part of the population does not believe anymore in the action of the two main
political parties8 . When the republicans are in control, they conduct action that the
democrats would do. And when the democrats are in power, they conduct action that
republicans would do. Therefore there is no difference anymore between those two parties
and population is tired of this competition that brings no concrete solution to their daily
problems. Even if citizens do not truly rely on the idea of the Populist Party, they are
willing to vote for it in order to make some changes, even if it means having a government
that is willing to close frontier and expulse immigrants and refugees out of the country.
To understand why people are ready to accept this kind of politics, it is important to
highlight that due to the economic crisis, more and more middle class families have to
move and live in suburban region, because of the rise of property price in large city, such
as Paris or Marseille. Their delocalization into what is called “sensitive district” raised
some issue. Indeed, the families of immigrants that were already living there saw those
middle class family as a threat as there were not from the same community and culture9.
And on the other side, the middle class families were afraid of living in those districts and
start to develop anger against immigrants as they saw them as the root of all the problems
(stealing jobs, security issue etc.). That is how people get sick of being forced to live in
mixed community. Therefore, as more families had to move in those districts, as more
children had been raised in this unhealthy atmosphere of fear of each other, naturally
8 Cl. H, Justice et paix Europe lance une action contre le nationalisme et l'exclusion, La Croix, Février 18,
2015. Catholic center-right newspaper. 9 Bel, C., On vote Front National, Le Monde, Décembre 16, 2015.
9
more people are willing to listen to the argument of the Populist Party and are willing to
vote for what they offer. Even if it is not the right choice, even if it will only increase this
feeling of fear.
2. What can be done against Nationalism?
How to change people's mind? How to make a population understand - which is
so angry about the passive action of their past governments - that closing frontiers and
protecting themselves behind a wall is not the good choice. Because when the wall will
fall, and it will someday, it will only be too difficult for them to catch up with the rest of
the world that would have continue without them. It is truly crucial to understand that
closing the door to each other is a considerable mistake. Because it would mean that we
are closed to the rest of the world, we are closed to the chance to be reunited and therefore
being stronger against common enemies, such as ISIS. But also it is very important to
stand together in order to achieve common goals, such as saving our planet from its
ecological destruction. Populations, not only in France, but also all over the globe, need
to understand that there are larger issues than the threat of their personal interest. In order
to change minds, we need more people to raise consciousness and awareness about those
issues. We need the young generation to travel and discover other cultures to start the
process. Participating to the SCI Do it Project for refugees have done that for us. We have
realized how important it is to stay close to each other, especially if our neighbour is not
from the same origin as ours. We can learn so many things from one another, and even
more when we are not from the same culture, because we have different points of view
and understandings of situations and therefore it is rewarding for both to be able to listen
and understand each other. That is how we can fight fear of different and unknown,
misunderstanding, prejudice and narrow-minded people. It is not by staying alone and
keeping away a problem that we can solve it, it is by becoming allies with various people,
with diversity, and facing it. A way to fight against populism would be to implement
some volunteer work in refugee asylum or make mandatory that every French student
have to spend a semester abroad to meet people from other culture. There is a huge lack
in the French educational system. Children do not get an education that allows them to
open their mind to others, to understand and to listen to different points of view. With a
government that want to close the frontier in order to limit even more non-French people
to come in the country, how will those children be confronted to difference? How will
they learn to be tolerant and to reward diversity?
10
Conclusion:
In conclusion, having a nationalist government would do much more damage than
it would provide benefit. As we saw in the first part of this paper, refugees and immigrant
are not so many accepted in France, it is not like the country is invaded and that there is
a real need of protection. We should not be afraid of opening to each other. Especially if
it could totally change the way we were seeing the world before. It would also bring
awareness about the danger of political ideas such as FN in France or Donald Trump in
the USA. We are in a time where things are going faster and change really quickly. We
will have struggle to adapt ourselves, as it is going so fast. We just have to look to new
technology to be convinced that we will soon be obsolete toward what we are creating10.
The only way to survive and to adapt ourselves is to embrace all those changes, to accept
them and to work all together to face not only enemies, but also the way we are evolving.
Closing frontier, and keeping population separated from others, is a protection in reaction
of the fear we are feeling toward all those changes. Changes that older generation do not
understand. But it is like staying in a house and feeling safe while a hurricane is coming
to it. This feeling of protection is fake and will be destroyed by the strength of those
upcoming changes. Thanks to international studies, younger generation have been able to
go abroad and meet different kinds of people that helped them construct their opinion. It
is the moment for younger generations to have an impact on the decision that will be
made and that can make either serious damage nor save population, like did Germany.
We all need to transfer this awareness and to bring light to other people that can struggle
to understand the real consequences of a populist politic.
10 T.L. Friedman, Dancing in a Hurricane, The New York Times, Opinion Pages, November 19, 2016.
Democrat newspaper.
11
Bibliography:
- Ministry of interior, [Online]:
http://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Statistiques/Tableaux-
statistiques/Les-demandes-d-asile-statistiques
- EUROSTAT, March 4th, 2016
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7203842/3-04032016-AP-
FR.pdf/078f4e14-8bb7-45d2-bdbf-8bb3881270b2
- Damgé, M., (October 13th, 2016) À quoi les migrants ont-ils vraiment le droit en
France?, Le Monde [Online]
http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2016/10/13/a-quoi-les-migrants-ont-ils-
vraiment-droit-en-france_5012683_4355770.html
- Goudeseune, M., (October 30th, 2016), Migrants de Calais: "conditions de vie indignes"
, La Voix du Nord [Online]
http://www.lavoixdunord.fr/region/migrants-de-calais-conditions-de-vie-indignes-selon-
ia33b48581n3605450#
- RT en Français (March 18th, 2016), Calais: un CRS poursuivi pour acte de violence à
l'encontre de migrants [Online]
https://francais.rt.com/france/17389-crs-violence-migrants-proces
- Cl. H, (February 18th, 2015) Justice et paix Europe lance une action contre le
nationalisme et l'exclusion, La Croix
- Bel, C., (December 16th, 2015) On vote Front National, Le Monde
- Friedman, T.L. (November 19, 2016) Dancing in a Hurricane, The New York Times,
Opinion Pages