18
School Facilities Construction Commission Project Overview Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS) Student Achievement through High Performance Schools October 2011

School Facilities Construction Commission Project Overview Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS) Student Achievement through High Performance

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

School Facilities Construction CommissionProject Overview

Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS)

Student Achievement through High Performance SchoolsOctober 2011

KFICS Classification Tools – By Cost or Investment

2

Condition + Suitability + Technology Needs Budget ($)

= Kentucky Facility Index (KFI)

Kentucky Facility Index: Current Replacement Value ($)

SUMMARY of Cost or Investment Budget Classification Tools

FCI (Condition Index) KSI (Suitability Index) KTI (Technology Index) KFI (Kentucky Facility Index)

KFICS Benchmark Metrics – Condition FCI

Industry “standards”:

FCI Condition< .05 Good.05 thru .10 Fair.10 > Poor

Needs Budget of 10K

CRV of 100K

10,000100,000

= .10 FCIEXAMPLE:

Condition Needs Budget ($)= Facility Condition

Index (FCI)Condition Index:

Current Replacement Value ($)

Average existing:~.25 to .35

~.65 -.70 is a flag to consider

major renovation or demolition

3

KFICS School Condition Data and Criteria

4

Replacement Cost Model

KFICS Building / School Condition Score

5

Knowing What You Have: Condition Concepts

6

1960 1980 2000 2020

Deferred Maintenance Example: 20 year rooftop HVAC unit

2011

Capital Renewal

Installed

Installed

Unit “expired” in 1980 and was unfunded for replacement

Unit is 50% used; predict renewal budget for 2020

KFICS: Managing Facility Failures

Three types of failuresA. Early (warranty

period)

B. Intrinsic

C. Wear-out (run to failure)

Actionable investments to extend life during the Intrinsic Period (A&B)

Investments to manage failure risk in the Wear-Out period (C)

7

Early Failure Period

Intrinsic Failure Period

“Useful Life”

Wear -Out Period

“Run to Failure”

0 Time

Fa

ilu

re R

ate

h(t

)

Component Failure Curve

A B C

Source: Engineering Statistics Handbook

FCI vs. Facility Age

8

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 81-85 86-90 91-95

FCI

Age

FCI to Age of Building

65%

60% (Total Renovation)

30% (roof, HVAC)

KDE Renovation Points

SUMMARY of Criteria Classification Tools Condition Score (1- FCI) Suitability Score (Scored Points / Possible Points) Technology Score (Scored Points / Possible Points) Kentucky School Score (KSS)

9

KFICS Classification Tools – By Criteria

(Condition Score * .75) + (Suitability Score * .20) + (Technology Score * .05)

= Kentucky School Score

(0 – 100)

Kentucky School Score:

KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Scoring

10

11

KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Scoring

KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Models

12

KFICS Scoring Weights

Condition = 75% of School Score Suitability = 20% of School Score Technology = 5% of School Score

13

Required Investment Benchmarks

The First Set of Benchmark Metrics is based on Cost or Required Investment:

14

Index Formula or Calculation

Max/ Minimum Values

Kentucky Facility Index (KFI)

(Repair$ + Suitability$ + TechRead$) / Replace$

Worst 143.49% | Best 0%

Kentucky Suitability Index (KSI)

Ratio of Suitability cost / Replacement value Worst 35% | Best 0%

Kentucky Technology Index (KTI) Ratio of Technology cost / Replacement value Worst 1.77% | Best 0%

Facility Condition Index (FCI)

Ratio of Repair cost / Replacement value Worst 106.72% | Best 0%

Criteria Scoring Benchmarks

The Second Set of Benchmark Metrics is built on Criteria Scoring:

15

Index Formula or Calculation

Max/ Minimum Values

Condition Score (1-FCI %) times 100 Worst 0 | Best 100

Suitability Score Criteria Based Scored Points / Possible Points

Worst 0 | Best 100

Technology Score Sum of Points for Technology Criteria Scored

Worst 0 | Best 100

School Score (Condition Score *.75) + Suitability Score * .20) + (Technology Score * .05)

Worst 0 | Best 100

Scores for Recently Renovated Building

Investment Requirements Condition Index Criteria Scoring

Repair: $0 KFI: 2.24% Condition Score: 100.00

Suitability: $269,574 KSI: 2.24% Suitability Score: 93.60

Tech Readiness: $0 KTI: 0.00% Technology

Score: 100.00

Replace-ment Value: $12,034,410 FCI: 0.00% School Score: 98.72

16

Scores for Older Non-Renovated Building

Investment Requirements Condition Index Criteria Scoring

Repair: $7,329,689 KFI: 93.58% Condition Score: 22.72

Suitability: $1,470,080 KSI: 15.50% Suitability Score: 62.46

Tech Readiness: $76,220 KTI: 0.80% Technology

Score: 51.40

Replace-ment Value: $9,485,000 FCI: 77.28% School Score: 32.10

17

District FeedBack System

18

Archived report versions

Web-based report review comments from district

KDE response on actions taken

PDF School Report